Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada. Title - Sujet JAVA APPLICATIONS PROF SERVICES. Solicitation No. - N de l'invitation 01B /A

Transcription

1 Public Wks and Government Services Canada Travaux publics et Services gouvernementaux Canada 1 1 RETURN BIDS TO: RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions - TPSGC 11 Laurier St., / 11, rue Laurier Place du Ptage, Phase III Ce 0A1/Noyau 0A1 Gatineau Québec K1A 0S5 Bid Fax: (819) SOLICITATION AMENDMENT MODIFICATION DE L'INVITATION The referenced document is hereby revised; unless otherwise indicated, all other terms and conditions of the Solicitation remain the same. Ce document est par la présente révisé; sauf indication contraire, les modalités de l'invitation demeurent les mêmes. Title - Sujet JAVA APPLICATIONS PROF SERVICES Solicitation No. - N de l'invitation 01B /A Client Reference No. - N de référence du client 01B GETS Reference No. - N de référence de SEAG PW-$$EL File No. - N de dossier 609el.01B CCC No./N CCC - FMS No./N VME Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin at - à 02:00 PM on - le F.O.B. - F.A.B. Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Josée Bastien Telephone No. - N de téléphone (819) ( ) Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: Amendment No. - N modif. 007 Date Time Zone Fuseau haire Eastern Standard Time EST Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur 609el FAX No. - N de FAX ( ) - Comments - Commentaires Vend/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Instructions: See Herein Instructions: Voir aux présentes Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Delivery Offered - Livraison proposée Vend/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Issuing Office - Bureau de distribution Infmatics Professional Services - EL Division/Services professionnels en infmatique - division EL 4C2, Place du Ptage Gatineau Québec K1A 0S5 Telephone No. - N de téléphone Facsimile No. - N de télécopieur Name and title of person authized to sign on behalf of Vend/Firm (type print) Nom et titre de la personne autisée à signer au nom du fournisseur/ de l'entrepreneur (taper ou écrire en caractères d'imprimerie) Signature Date Canada Page 1 of - de 9

2 01B /A el 01B el01B This Amendment number 007 is raised to responds to the following vend's quetions: QUESTION 1 Amendment 5, Question/Answer 2 - The revision noted in the amendment modified the scing f rated requirements R.2, R.3, R.4 and R.5, thus it appears that the "Tools and Technologies" element has been removed from rated requirements R.2, R.3, R.4 and R.5; however, the amendment does not indicate what changes are to be made to the RFP that crespond to this revised scing. Please confirm that in addition to the revised scing, the "Tools and Technologies" section in rated requirements R.2, R.3, R.4 and R.5 is to be removed. ANSWER 1 At ATTACHMENT 1 BID EVALUATION CRITERIA, 2. POINT RATED REQUIREMENT, of the RFP, amend as follows: DELETE in it's interity: R-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY; R-3 APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY AND TOOL SET; R.4 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; R.5 DOCUMENTATION OF DELIVERABLES; INSERT: R-2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY R.2.1 The Bidder should provide one reference project where the project management methodology proposed in response to Cpate Evaluation Criteria M-3 was used to manage the delivery of the wk. To be considered, the reference project provided must: Have been completed in the last Address Phone Demonstrated utilization of proposed project management methodology set: points - The Bidder demonstrated how each element of the project management methodology (described in response to M-3) was utilized to manage the referenced project. Project Scope Page 2 of - de 9

3 01B /A el 01B el01B PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY seven (7) years. If the reference project is not complete, the contract must have been in place f a minimum of twelve months. Address Phone points - Project was f the development of a web application on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent); 5 points - Project was f the development of a web application. Project Size points - The cost of end-to-end of $5,000,000 (Canadian); 5 points - The cost of end-to-end of $2,000,0000 (Canadian). Project Complexity MAX. AVAILABLE POINTS POINTS ACHIEVED 40 points - Project was f the end-to-end development project with a service iented architecture framewk based on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent). R-3 APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY AND TOOL SET Page 3 of - de 9

4 01B /A el 01B el01B APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY AND TOOL SET R.3.1 The Bidder should provide one reference project where the application development methodology and tool set proposed in response to Cpate Evaluation Criteria M-4 was used to plan, design and develop an application. To be considered, the reference project provided must: Address Phone Demonstrated utilization of proposed application development methodology and tool set. points - The Bidder demonstrated that the proposed application development methodology and tool set (described in response to M-4) was applied f the referenced project. Project Scope i. Have been a Java-based application development project; and ii. Have been completed in the last seven years. If the reference project is not complete, the contract must have been in place f a minimum of twelve months. points - Project was f the development of a web application on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent); 5 points - Project was f the development of a web application. Project Size points - The cost of end-to-end of $5,000,000 (Canadian); 5 points - The cost of end-to-end of $2,000,000 (Canadian). Project Complexity MAX. AVAILABLE POINTS 40 points - Project was f the end-to-end development project with a service iented architecture framewk based on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent). Page 4 of - de 9

5 01B /A el 01B el01B POINTS ACHIEVED R.4 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM R.4.1 The Bidder should provide one reference project where the same quality management plan proposed in response to Cpate Evaluation Criteria M-5 was used to manage the quality and functionality of the application. To be considered, the reference project provided must: i. Have been a Java-based application development project; Address Phone Demonstrated utilization of proposed quality management plan. points - The Bidder demonstrated that the proposed quality management plan (described in response to M-5) was applied f the referenced project. Project Scope points - Project was f the development of a web application on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent); ii. Have been completed in the last seven (7) years. If the reference project is not complete, the contract must have been in place f a minimum of twelve (12) months. 5 points - Project was f the development of a web application. Project Size points - The cost of end-to-end of $5,000,000 (Canadian); 5 points - The cost of end-to-end of $2,000,000 (Canadian). Project Complexity points - Project was f the end-to-end development project with a service iented architecture framewk Page 5 of - de 9

6 01B /A el 01B el01B QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MAX. AVAILABLE POINTS POINTS ACHIEVED 40 Address Phone based on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent). R.5 DOCUMENTATION OF DELIVERABLES DOCUMENTATION OF DELIVERABLES R.5.1 The Bidder should provide one reference project where the same deliverable documentation plan proposed in response to Cpate Evaluation Criteria M-6 was used to ensure that the client was able to understand and maintain the software code developed under the contract. Address Phone Demonstrated utilization of proposed deliverable documentation plan: points - The Bidder demonstrated that the proposed deliverable documentation plan (described in response to M-6) was applied f the referenced project. Project Scope To be considered, the reference project provided must: i. Have been a Java-based application development project; points - Project was f the development of a web application on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent); ii. Have been completed in the last Page 6 of - de 9

7 01B /A el 01B el01B DOCUMENTATION OF DELIVERABLES seven years. If the reference project is not complete, the contract must have been in place f a minimum of twelve months. Address Phone 5 points - Project was f the development of a web application. Project Size : points - The cost of end-to-end of $5,000,000 (Canadian); 5 points - The cost of end-to-end of $2,000,000 (Canadian). Project Complexity: MAX. AVAILABLE POINTS POINTS ACHIEVED 40 points - Project was f the end-to-end development project with a service iented architecture framewk based on the J2EE platfm (version 1.3 me recent). QUESTION 2 Amendment 5, Question/Answer 5 - The insertion noted f rated requirement R.1.2 does not appear to include the revision made to R.1.2 b) and R.1.2 k) in Amendment 2, Question/Answer 20. Please confirm the changes made to both R.1.2 b) and R.1.2 k) in Amendment 2, Question/Answer 20 remain valid and that the revision in Amendment 5, Question/Answer 5 should be updated accdingly. ANSWER 2 At ATTACHMENT 1, BID EVALUATION CRITERIA, 2. POINT RATED REQUIREMENT, R-1 CORPORATE EXPERIENCE (REFERENCE PROJECTS), of the RFP, amend as follows: Delete R.1.2, in its entirety. Page 7 of - de 9

8 01B /A el 01B el01B INSERT: R.1.2 Tools & Technologies The Bidder should demonstrate that it utilized any of the following tools, technologies methods to develop the referenced Java enterprise application: a) Wkflow business process management capabilities using a COTS open source wkflow/bpm solution incpating open standards (e.g., BPMN, WS-BPEL); 30 The Bidder will receive up to 30 points as follows: 3.75 points f each criterion (a to k) demonstrated to a maximum of 30 points. b) Implementation of web services using open source framewks that use open standards (e.g. JAX-WS, JAX-RS). c) Oracle (version g higher) f persistent data stage; d) Industry-dominant visual modeling tools that suppt Unified Modeling Language (UML) diagramming and code generation round-trip engineering (e.g. Rational Software Architect, Sparx Enterprise Architect, Eclipse-based UML tools such as Eclipse UML2, MyEclipse UML Apollo f Eclipse, No Magic MagicDraw, Gentleware Poseidon f UML); e) Use of an automated testing tool, such as Rational Selenium, to suppt the testing of the application; f) Java application build automation tools such as Apache Ant Apache Maven; g) Eclipse an Eclipse-based tool (i.e. Rational Software Architect, CodeGear JBuilder, MyEclipse) as an Integrated Development Environment; Page 8 of - de 9

9 01B /A el 01B el01B h) Integration technologies that utilize SOAP REST as an open standard; i) Iterative and incremental application development methodology based on the Unified Software Development Process; j) Subversion (SVN) as a source code version control system; and k) Bug and issue tracking systems (e.g. Atlassian JIRA). ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED. Page 9 of - de 9