arxiv: v1 [math.st] 21 Aug 2009

Transcription

1 The Aals of Statistics 2009, Vol. 37, No. 5A, DOI: /08-AOS640 c Istitute of Mathematical Statistics, 2009 arxiv: v1 [math.st] 21 Aug 2009 ESTIMATING THE DEGREE OF ACTIVITY OF JUMPS IN HIGH FREQUENCY DATA By Yacie Aït-Sahalia 1 ad Jea Jacod Priceto Uiversity ad UPMC (Uiversité Paris-6) We defie a geeralized idex of jump activity, propose estimators of that idex for a discretely sampled process ad derive the estimators properties. These estimators are applicable despite the presece of Browia volatility i the process, which makes it more challegig to ifer the characteristics of the small, ifiite activity jumps. Whe the method is applied to high frequecy stock returs, we fid evidece of ifiitely active jumps i the data ad estimate their idex of activity. 1. Itroductio. Usig high frequecy fiacial data, which are ow widely available, we ca hope to aswer a umber of questios regardig the characteristics of the process that drives asset returs. Let us model the log-price X of some asset as a 1-dimesioal process, which we will observe over a fixed time iterval [0,T] at discrete times 0,,2,... with a time iterval betwee successive observatios that is small. This is the essece of high frequecy data. Let us further assume that this process is a Itô semimartigale, meaig that its characteristics are absolutely cotiuous with respect to Lebesgue measure. So, it has a drift, a cotiuous martigale part that is the itegral of a possibly stochastic process with respect to a Browia motio, ad we will also let it have jumps with a possibly stochastic Lévy measure. For modelig purposes, oe would like to ifer the characteristics of X from the observatios; that is, its drift, volatility ad Lévy measure. Whe the time iterval goes to 0, it is well kow that oe ca cosistetly ifer the volatility uder very weak assumptios. However, such cosistet iferece is impossible for the drift or the Lévy measure, if the overall time iterval [0,T] is kept fixed. Received March 2008; revised July Supported i part by NSF Grat DMS AMS 2000 subject classificatios. Primary 62F12, 62M05; secodary 60H10, 60J60. Key words ad phrases. Jumps, idex of activity, ifiite activity, discrete samplig, high frequecy. This is a electroic reprit of the origial article published by the Istitute of Mathematical Statistics i The Aals of Statistics, 2009, Vol. 37, No. 5A, This reprit differs from the origial i pagiatio ad typographic detail. 1

2 2 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD I fact, eve i the urealistic case where the whole path of X is observed over [0,T], oe ca ifer either the drift or the Lévy measure. Oe ca, however, hope to be able to characterize the behavior of the Lévy measure ear 0: first, whether it does ot explode ear 0, meaig that the umber of jumps is fiite; ad secod, whe this umber is ifiite, we would like to be able to say somethig about the cocetratio of small jumps. Our objective i doig so is to provide specificatio tools for fiacial models, where the presece or at least possibility of large jumps is geerally accepted. There is much less cosesus i the literature regardig the ature or eve the eed for small jumps. For this purpose, let us defie, for a geeric semimartigale X, (1) B(r) t = X s r, I t = {r 0:B(r) t < }, β t = if(i t ), s t where X s = X s X s is the size of the jump at time s, ad r 0, with the covetio 0 0 = 0. Necessarily, the (radom) set I t cotais the iterval (β t, ), whereas it may cotai β t itself or ot. Moreover, 2 I t always, ad, of course, t β t is odecreasig. Hece, if we observe the whole path of X over [0,T], we kow the sets I t (ω) ad the umbers β t (ω) for all t T. We call β T (ω) the jump activity idex for the path t X t (ω) at time T (or, more precisely, up to time T). We defie this idex i aalogy with the special case where X is a Lévy process. I this case, I t ad β t are o loger radom. Further, they do ot deped o the time t, ad I t is also the set of all r 0 such that { x 1} x r F(dx) <, where F is the Lévy measure. This property shows that, for a Lévy process, the jump activity idex coicides with the Blumethal Getoor idex of the process [see Blumethal ad Getoor (1961)]. I the further special case where X is a stable process, β is also the stable idex of the process. Whe X is a Lévy process, the iterval I ad the idex β are, of course, oly tiy elemets of the whole Lévy measure F, which covey approximately the same iformatio (I gives slightly more iformatio tha β). However, the value of β is probably the most iformative kowledge oe ca draw about F from the observatio of the path t X t for all t T whe T is fiite. Thigs are very differet whe T, though, sice observig X over [0, ) completely specifies F. But, whe the time horizo T is kept fixed, ad with the whole path observed over [0,T], we ca ifer oly the behavior of the Lévy measure F ear 0 (because we eed a potetially ifiite umber of observatios for cosistet estimatio). The, β captures a essetial qualitative feature of F, which is its level of activity, which is that whe β icreases, the (small) jumps ted to become more ad more frequet. β is related to the degree of activity of jumps. All Lévy measures put fiite mass o the set (, ε] [ε,+ ) for ay arbitrary ε > 0; therefore,

3 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 3 if the process has ifiite jump activity, the it must be because of the small jumps, which are defied as those smaller tha ε. If F([ ε,ε]) <, the the process has fiite activity ad 0 I, or, equivaletly, β = 0. But, if F([ ε,ε]) =, the the process has ifiite activity, ad, i additio, β > 0 as log as the Lévy measure F([ ε,ε]) diverges ear 0 at a rate larger tha a power ε a for some a > 0. The higher β gets (up to 2), the more active the small jumps become. The same remarks also apply for geeral semimartigales. These properties are what motivate our callig β a jump activity idex ad our iterest i estimatig it. I the more realistic situatio where the semimartigale X is oly observed at times i over [0,T], the estimatio problem is made more challegig by the presece i X of a cotiuous martigale part. By its very ature, β T characterizes the behavior of F ear 0. Hece, it is atural to expect that the small icremets of the process are goig to be the oes that are most iformative about β T. But, those small icremets are precisely the oes where the cotributio from the cotiuous martigale part of the process is iexorably mixed with the cotributio from the small jumps. Beig able to see through the cotiuous part of the semimartigale i order to say somethig about the umber ad cocetratio of small jumps is goig to be the challege we face as we attempt to estimate β T. Related to this paper are Woerer (2006), who proposes a estimator of the jump activity idex ad of the Hurst expoet, but i the absece of a cotiuous Browia part to the semimartigale, ad Cot ad Macii (2007), who propose a test for the fiiteess of the variatio of the jump part. Also, Belomesty (2008) estimates the same idex whe there is o Browia part ad whe, together with the prices, some optio prices also are recorded. Aother related problem is the estimatio of the idex β of a stable process [see, e.g., DuMouchel (1983)]. However, our situatio here is fudametally differet from those, i that we also have a cotiuous part i the semimartigale. The situatio is also differet from that i Aït- Sahalia ad Jacod (2008), where we studied Fisher s iformatio for the parameters of a Browia plus stable pure jump process, but the jump process was the domiat compoet i that paper. Here, the cotiuous part of the semimartigale domiates the small icremets, ad we estimate the activity idex of a pure jump process where the domiat compoet is a Browia motio. The aim of this paper is to costruct estimators ˆβ (T) for β T, which are cosistet whe 0, ad to provide rates of covergece ad asymptotic distributios. Ideally, we would also like to have estimators that are, as much as possible, model-free, i the sese that they behave well without too strog assumptios o the form of the drift, the volatility or the Lévy measure. As it turs out, a fully model-free behavior of the estimators may be too much to ask. The assumptios we make below o the drift ad the

4 4 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD volatility process are quite urestrictive, but obtaiig rates of covergece will require more specific assumptios o the Lévy measure. I particular, we will assume that the mai part of the Lévy measure ear 0 behaves locally like the Lévy measure of a stable process, ad we will provide estimators ad their properties whe the idex is β > 0. This assumptio seems to be uavoidable, sice, as we shall also see, eve whe X is a Lévy process, strog assumptios o the Lévy measure are ecessary. At this jucture, it may be worth otig that cosiderig semimartigales rather tha simply Lévy processes, or expoetials of such, does ot chage or weake the results. The paper is orgaized as follows. I Sectio 2, we formally defie the idex of jump activity, costruct estimators for it ad preset the mai properties of the estimators i the geeral case where the process is a semimartigale. Sectio 3 is devoted to the special ad simpler case of a symmetric stable process, ad Sectio 4 is about more geeral Lévy processes. We propose a small sample bias correctio i Sectio 5. We preset the results of Mote Carlo simulatios i Sectio 6, ad we compute our estimators over all 2006 trasactios of the Dow Joes stocks i Sectio 7, focusig i particular o Itel ad Microsoft. Sectio 8 is devoted to techical results ad to the proof of the mai theorems, which apply to Itô semimartigales, uder suitable assumptios o the Lévy measure. 2. The model ad mai results Defiig a idex of jump activity. Our structural assumptio is that X is a 1-dimesioal Itô semimartigale o some filtered space (Ω, F,(F t ) t 0,P), which meas that its characteristics (B,C,ν) are absolutely cotiuous with respect to Lebesgue measure [see Jacod ad Shiryaev (2003) for all otios ot explaied here]. I other words, the characteristics of X have the form (2) B t = t 0 b s ds, C t = t 0 σ 2 s ds, ν(dt,dx) = dtf t(dx). Here, b = (b t ) ad σ = (σ t ) are real-valued optioal processes, ad F t = F t (ω,dx) is a predictable radom measure, meaig that for all Borel sets A i R the process (F t (A)) is predictable (possibly takig the value + ). This model is quite geeral. For istace, the drift, volatility ad jump measures ca be stochastic ad jump themselves. There are other ways of expressig this assumptio, for example through a Wieer process W ad a Poisso radom measure µ with compesator ν(dt,dx) = dt dx (up to a possible elargemet of the space), as X t = X 0 + t 0 b s ds + t 0 σ s dw s

5 (3) + + ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 5 t 0 R t 0 R δ(s,x)1 { δ(s,x) 1} (µ ν)(ds,dx) δ(s,x)1 { δ(s,x) >1} µ(ds,dx). I this formulatio, b ad σ are the same as i (2), δ = δ(ω,t,x) is a predictable fuctio ad the coectio with F t is that F t (ω,dx) is the restrictio to R \ {0} of the image of the Lebesgue measure by the map x δ(ω,t,x). However, it is easier for the problem at had to express the assumptios o F t rather tha o δ, which, moreover, is ot uique (whereas F t is uiquely defied, up to ull sets). Below, for ay measure H o R we deote by H its (symmetrical) tail fuctio (4) x > 0 H(x) = H([ x,x] c ). Observe that B(r) t < if ad oly if B (r) t <, where B (r) t = s t X s r 1, ad the process B (r) is fiite-valued if ad oly if it is locally itegrable. I other words, divergece, whe it occurs, is caused by the small jumps. Moreover, for ay stoppig time T, we have ( T ) E(B (r) T ) = E ds ( x r 1)F s (dx). 0 R We call istataeous jump activity idex at time t the (radom) umber { } (5) βt i = if r > 0: ( x r 1)F s (dx) <. R I light of (5), this is a atural geeralizatio of the otio of Blumethal Getoor idex for Lévy processes [see Blumethal ad Getoor (1961)]. β i is a predictable process takig its values i [0, 2]. This process is also characterized by the property that, for ay ε > 0, we have (6) lim x 0 xβi t +ε F t (x) = 0, limsupx βi t ε F t (x) =. x 0 The lim sup above is usually ot a limit. Note, fially, that βt i = 0 does ot ecessarily imply that the process has fiite jump activity, sice it is possible for the Lévy measure to diverge slowly ear 0, at a subgeometric speed. A example of this would be the Gamma process, which has F(dx) = (η exp( κx)1 {x>0} /x)dx, so that the Lévy measure F t (ε) diverges at a logarithmic rate i ε. Fiite activity processes (compoud Poisso) will have βt i = 0 a.s., however.

6 6 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD 2.2. Assumptios. We make two assumptios. The first oe, o the drift b ad volatility σ, is quite mild. Assumptio 1. The processes b ad σ are locally bouded. The secod assumptio, o the Lévy measures F t, is more specific. Essetially, we split F t as F t = F t + F t, where: F t is very close to the Lévy measure of a β-stable process, restricted to a radom iterval ( z ( ) t,z (+) t ) aroud 0 with some β that is ot radom; the radom iterval may be empty for some (ω,t), but ot for all; F t is aother Lévy measure with jump activity idex less tha some β < β. The precise statemet of the assumptio is as follows. Assumptio 2. There are three (oradom) umbers β (0,2), β [0,β) ad γ > 0, ad a locally bouded process L t 1, such that we have, for all (ω, t), (7) where: (8) (a) F t has the form F t (dx) = 1 + x γ f(t,x) x 1+β (a (+) F t = F t + F t, t 1 (+) + {0<x z t } a( ) t 1 ( ) )dx { z t x<0} for some predictable oegative processes a (+) t,a ( ) t,z (+) t ad z ( ) t ad some predictable fuctio f(ω,t,x) satisfyig (9) 1 z (+) 1 t 1, z ( ) t 1, a (+) t L t L t 1 + x f(t,x) 0, f(t,x) L t ; + a ( ) t L t, (b) F t is a measure that is sigular with respect to F t ad satisfies (10) ( x β 1)F t (dx) L t. R We will also eed the icreasig ad locally bouded process (11) t Ā t = A s ds, 0 where A t = a(+) t + a ( ) t. β

7 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 7 Remark 1. I view of (6), the istataeous idex at time t due to part F t of the Lévy measure is β o the set {A t > 0}, ad 0, otherwise; whereas, the oe due to F t is everywhere smaller tha β. Hece, outside a ull set, we have β t = β o the set {Āt > 0} ad β t β, otherwise. Remark 2. Oe could formulate Assumptio 2 slightly differetly by writig F t = Ft 1 + Ft 2, where Ft 1 is give by (8) with f(t,x) = 0 ad Ft 2 satisfyig (10) with some β, ad, further, the restrictio of Ft 2 to [ z ( ),z (+) ] has a absolutely cotiuous part with a desity of the form f(t,x) x γ 1 β with (9). The two formulatios are equivalet, provided that we take β = β (β γ). (12) Remark 3. Take ay process of the form dx t = b t dt + σ t dw t + δ t dy t + δ t dy t, where δ ad δ are càdlàg adapted processes, Y is β-stable or tempered β-stable ad Y is ay other Lévy process whose Lévy measure itegrates x β ear the origi ad has a absolutely cotiuous part whose desity is smaller tha K x γ 1 β o [ 1,1] for some γ > 0 (e.g., a stable process with idex strictly smaller tha β ). The, X will satisfy Assumptio 2. For istace, whe further Y is symmetrical with Lévy desity D/ x 1+β, it is satisfied with the two umbers β ad β, γ (as above), f(t,x) = 0, z ( ) t = z (+) t = 1 ad a ( ) t = a (+) t = Dδ β t. Remark 4. Whe X is a Lévy process, so that F t (ω,dx) = F(dx) does ot deped o t ad ω, Assumptio 2 is related with the property that X is a regular Lévy process of expoetial type, as itroduced i Boyarcheko ad Levedorskiĭ (2002), with β = ν ad β (β γ) = ν i the otatio of that paper. These two assumptios are ot exactly comparable. The oe i Boyarcheko ad Levedorskiĭ (2002) is more striget about the behavior of big jumps, whereas ours is slightly more demadig for small jumps The estimators. Recall that we observe X i for i = 0,1,...,[T/ ]. While the processes B(r) are defied from the jumps X s = X s X s of X, we do ot observe these jumps directly. Rather, all that we observe are the discrete icremets (13) i X = X i X (i 1). From these icremets, we could try to evaluate B(r) T ad the ifer β. Fidig cosistet estimators for B(r) T is easy, but deducig from them a estimator for β is almost impossible, because we eed to decide whether B(r) T is ifiite or ot based o a fiite sample.

8 8 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD (14) So, we propose the followig idea. For fixed > 0 ad α > 0, we write [t/ ] U(,α) t = i=1 1 { i X >α } for the umber of icremets whose magitude is greater tha α. I all cases below, we will set < 1/2. To better uderstad our ratioale for doig this, cosider the special case X = σw + Y, where Y is a β-stable process, so β t (ω) = β. Ay icremet i X = X i X (i 1) satisfies i X = σ 1/2 W 1 + 1/β Y 1 (equality i law). The, recallig that β < 2 ad 0, with a large probability i X is close to σ 1/2 W 1 i law. Those icremets give essetially o iformatio o Y ad are of order of magitude 1/2. However if Y has a big jump at time s, the correspodig icremet is close to Y s. Hece, oe has to throw away all the small icremets. However, β is related to the behavior of F ear 0 ad, hece, to the very small jumps of Y. This is why we will use oly icremets bigger tha a cutoff level α for some (0,1/2). Asymptotically, those icremets are big, because, sice 1/2, the mai cotributio is due to Y. Those icremets mostly cotai a sigle big jump of size of order at least, ad we still get some iformatio o small jumps, because 0. So, by usig the statistic U, which simply couts the umber of large icremets, defied as those greater tha α, we are retaiig oly those icremets of X that are ot predomiatly made of cotributios from its cotiuous semimartigale part, which are O p ( 1/2 ), ad istead are predomiatly made of cotributios due to a jump. The same heuristics work for more geeral Itô semimartigales. As we will see later, the key property of the fuctioals U(,α, ) is their covergece i probability (15) β U(,α) t P Āt α β, which we will show holds uder Assumptio 2. This property leads us to propose a estimator of β at each stage. Fix 0 < α < α ad defie (16) ˆβ (t,,α,α ) = log(u(,α) t /U(,α ) t ) log(α, /α) which is at least cosistet for estimatig β o the set {Āt > 0}. If either value of U i (16) (17) is 0, the, by covetio, we set the estimator to be 0. ˆβ is costructed from a suitably scaled ratio of two U s evaluated o the same time scale at two differet fixed levels of trucatio of the

9 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 9 icremets α ad α. I a way, this costructio is i the same spirit as the classical estimator of Hill (1975), who coducts iferece about the tails of a distributio based o ratios of various extremes. We ca also propose a secod estimator defied as (17) ˆβ (t,,α) = log(u(,α) t /U 2 (,α) t ), log 2 where U 2 (,α) t is defied aalogously to U(,α) t i (14), except that samplig at is replaced by samplig at 2. That is, ˆβ is costructed from a suitably scaled ratio of two U s evaluated at the same level of trucatio α o two separate time scales ad 2. Oe could also look at a third estimator ˆβ obtaied from two U s evaluated at two differet rates of trucatio ad. Oe could further cosider estimators based ot just o coutig the icremets that exceed a certai cutoff but also o the magitude of these icremets, as i the case of power variatios trucated to use oly the large icremets. I the rest of the paper, we will focus maily o the properties of the estimator ˆβ, otig that a similar type of aalysis yields the cosistecy ad asymptotic distributio of the other two estimators. I geeral, the asymptotic variace of ˆβ is smaller tha that of ˆβ ad ˆβ. Before studyig the properties of the estimator ˆβ, let us make a few remarks. Remark 5. Asymptotically, as, the above estimators behave well. However, for ay give, it may happe that they are ot iformative, because too few icremets are retaied, up to the extreme case where U(,α) t = U(,α ) t = 0. If this is the case, oe should take smaller values of α ad α. Remark 6. Eve whe the estimators are well defied, they may take a value bigger tha or equal to 2. I this case, the estimatio is ot reliable, ad it may be a idicatio that Assumptio 2 is simply ot satisfied, which would be the case for example if there is o jump at all i the observed path. So it would make sese to covice oeself that jumps are preset [see, e.g., Aït-Sahalia ad Jacod (2009)] before attemptig to estimate β. Remark 7. As we will see below, asymptotic cosideratios lead to the selectio of = 1/5 as a uiversal choice valid for all possible values of β. The cutoff for large icremets is α. Whe implemetig the estimator i practice, i ay give sample the value of is fixed, so ad α are ot idepedet parameters. The level of trucatio α may be set i relatio to the volatility of the cotiuous part of the semimartigale [i.e.,

10 10 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD (t 1 t 0 σ2 s ds)1/2 ] sice the objective is to elimiate the icremets that are maily due to the cotiuous part. The trucatio level ca be selected i a data-drive maer. Despite the presece of jumps, that volatility ca be estimated usig the small icremets of the process, sice (18) [t/ ] i=1 t i X 2 P 1 { i X α } σs 2 ds 0 for ay α > 0 ad (0,1/2). We ca the set the cutoff level α to yield a umber of (estimated) stadard deviatios of the cotiuous part of the semimartigale. For the estimator ˆβ, α ca the be set as a multiple of α. These data-drive choices determie a rage of reasoable values for (α,α ). Oe possibility is the to simply average the estimators ˆβ obtaied for the values of (α,α ) over that rage. The parameters (α,α ) effectively play a role similar to that of badwidth parameters i a oparametric aalysis. Remark 8. The costructio of the estimators relies o the property (15), which holds uder (slightly) weaker assumptios tha Assumptio 2, provided that the defiitio of Ā t ad the rate of covergece are suitably ameded. As a result, the estimators give i (16) remai cosistet uder weaker assumptios. For example, whe X has oly fiitely may jumps, the idex is β = 0, ad U(,α) t coverges to the umber of jumps betwee 0 ad t, irrespective of the value of α, so ˆβ is equal to 0 for all large eough (obviously, this rules out the possibility of a cetral limit theorem). Remark 9. Our estimator is based o the cout of big icremets, although we are iterested i the properties of the small jumps of X, which are those goverig the idex β. This is because the behavior of sums of the squares of the small icremets behave as described i (18), ad other powers smaller tha 2 are also drive by the Wieer part of X ad do ot provide isight o the small jumps. Perhaps cosiderig sums of powers bigger tha 2 for small icremets would provide a alterative meas of costructig estimators of β, but we did ot cosider this possibility here Properties of the estimators. Our first result states that our estimators estimate β o the (radom) set {Āt > 0}, where the jump activity idex is β, ad we ca state the followig rate of covergece. Theorem 1. Let 0 < α < α, 0 < < 1/2 ad t > 0. Uder Assumptios 1 ad 2, we have ˆβ (t,,α,α ) β o the set {Āt > 0}. Moreover, if χ = χ(β,γ,β, ) P

11 (19) ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 11 = ( γ) 1 β 3 (β β ) 1 + β 1 2 β 2 2, the the estimators ˆβ (t,,α,α ) are χ ε -rate cosistet for ay ε > 0 o 1 the set {Āt > 0}, i the sese that the sequece of variables ( (ˆβ (t,,α,α ) χ ε β)) 1 is bouded i probability (or, tight ) i restrictio to this set. The umber χ is positive, but it may also be very small. If we wat a associated distributioal result, we eed stroger assumptios, which essetially implies that χ = β/2 above, ad this requires that the activity idices β ad β γ of the ostable-like part of the Lévy measure be sufficietly apart from the leadig activity idex β, as follows. Theorem 2. Let 0 < α < α ad t > 0. Assume Assumptios 1 ad 2 with β [0,β/(2 + β)) ad γ > β/2. The, if < 1/(2 + β) 2/(5β), ad i restrictio to the set {Āt > 0}, we have the followig stable covergece i law to a cetered ormal variable idepedet of X: (20) 1 β/2 (ˆβ (t,,α,α ) β) L (s) N ( 0, α β α β Ā t (log(α /α)) 2 The qualifier i restrictio to the set {Āt > 0} is essetial i this statemet. Recall that, ulike the usual covergece i law, stable covergece i law makes it possible to restrict the covergece to a subset of Ω exactly as covergece i probability does. O the complemet set {Āt = 0}, aythig ca happe. O that set, the umber β has o meaig as a jump activity idex for X o [0,t]. Moreover, the stable covergece i law allows for the covergece of stadardized statistics. (21) Theorem 3. Uder the assumptios of Theorem 2, the variables log(α /α) 1/U(,α, ) t 1/U(,α, ) t (ˆβ (t,,α,α ) β) coverge stably i law, i restrictio to the set {Ā t > 0}, to a stadard ormal variable N(0, 1) idepedet of X. These results are model-free i a sese, because the drift ad the volatility processes are totally uspecified apart from Assumptio 1, ad the Lévy measures F t are uspecified, other tha the requiremets specified i Assumptio 2. These three theorems will be proved i Sectio 8 below. ).

12 12 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD The restrictio o give i the statemet of Theorem 2 restricts admissible values of i a maer that depeds o β. Sice β is ukow at this poit, we must select a uiversal value of that is admissible for all values of β. Not surprisigly, the most striget value of is obtaied i the limit where β < 2, yieldig = 1/5, ad this is the value we suggest for empirical applicatios. We ote (without proof) that a similar set of properties hold for the secod estimator ˆβ based o the ratio of U s estimated at two differet frequecies ad 2, with (21) replaced by the stadardized statistic (22) log2 (ˆβ (t,,α) β). 1/U(,α,2 ) t 1/U(,α, ) t 3. Stable processes. Here, we specialize the geeral results i a importat special case discussig, i particular, the efficiecy of the estimators of β we propose. I the special case of stable processes, the model is fully specified parametrically, ad we ca compare the properties of efficiet parametric estimators of β to those of the geeral estimators ˆβ. Deote, by Y, a symmetric stable process with idex β (0,1/2). We study the two situatios where X t = Y t (the simplest of all sice there is o cotiuous part) ad X t = bt + σw t + Y t, where σ > 0, b R ad W is a Browia motio. The Lévy measure depeds o a scale parameter A > 0 ad the idex β. It has the form F(dx) = Aβ dx, 2 x 1+β hece (23) F(x) := F([ x,x] c ) = A x β for x > 0. The law of Y 1 has a eve desity g ad a tail fuctio G(x) = P( Y 1 > x) satisfyig, as x [see Zolotarev (1986), Theorems ad Corollary 2 of Theorem 2.5.1], (24) g(x) = Aβ 2 x 1+β + O ( 1 x 1+2β ), G(x) = A ( ) 1 x β + O x 2β. I both cases X = Y ad X t = bt + σw t + Y t, we obviously have Assumptios 1 ad 2, with F t = F t = F ot depedig o (ω,t), ad with F t = F t = 0, Ξ = Ω (0, ), β = 0, ad f t (x) = 0 ad, fially, A t (ω) = A, which is the costat i (23). The, we ca apply the previous results, which further hold o the whole set Ω [because here Āt = ta > 0 for all (t,ω)]. The results are much easier to prove i this special case, ad also the requiremets o are sigificatly weaker, thus allowig for faster rates of covergece (the larger, the faster the covergece i Theorem 1). But these improved results are o loger model-free, sice the structure of jumps is completely specified i this stable model up to the ukow parameters A ad β.

13 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY The case X = Y. Cosider first the case where X has o cotiuous part. The, the geeral results o ˆβ ca be improved to yield the followig. Theorem 4. Assume that X = Y. Let 0 < α < α ad > 0 ad t > 0. The: (a) If < 1/β, the estimators ˆβ (t,,α,α ) coverge i probability to β; (b) If further < 2/(3β), we have stable covergece i law, over the whole set Ω, as described i Theorems 1 (with Āt = ta) ad 3. Note that i part (a) of the theorem, the closer β is to 2, the stroger the costrait o the trucatio rate. These estimators are ot, however, rate-efficiet. To see this, oe ca recall from Aït-Sahalia ad Jacod (2008) that the parametric model i which oe observes the values X i for i t is regular, ad its Fisher iformatio for estimatig β is asymptotically of the form (25) I log(1/ ) C β t for some costat C β. We ca thus hope for estimators that, after ceterig by β ad ormalizatio by log(1/ )/ are N(0,1/C β ), ad, i fact, the MLE does this. Where is the loss of efficiecy comig from? I order to compute our geeral estimators ˆβ, we are forced by the presece of a cotiuous part i X to discard a very sizeable portio of the data, which is the effect of trucatig away the small icremets of X. However, i this case, if somehow we kew from the start that there is o cotiuous part i X, the there would o loger be a eed to do that. It is clear that better estimators of β could the be costructed. Ad if, further, the law of Y has a fully-specified parametric form, as is the case here, the it would be possible to improve the estimators eve more. I this example, we would simultaeously estimate β ad A, but the rates would be uchaged ad it would be eve more model-depedet. So this is the kid of estimator that we do ot wat to use, sice we have o hope of extedig such a estimator to the geeral semimartigale situatio (or, i fact, eve to more geeral Lévy processes tha the stable oes) The case X t = bt + σw t + Y t. We ow study the situatio where Y is a stable process, but X ow also cotais a cotiuous part. The distributioal properties of the estimators follow directly i this special case. Ideed, for this model, U(,α) t is essetially the same as, or close to, the umber V (,α) t of jumps of Y that are bigger tha α i the iterval

14 14 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD [0,t]. But V (,α) t is a Poisso radom variable with parameter Ct/α β β where C is a costat. Hece, (26) (27) 1 β /2 β V (,α) t P C/α β, ( β V (,α) t C/αβ ) L N(0,C/α β ). These properties carry over to U(,α) t, ad this leads to the followig improvemet to Theorem 1. Theorem 5. Assume that X t = bt+σw t +Y t. Let 0 < α < α ad > 0 ad t > 0. The: (a) If < 1/2, the estimators ˆβ (t,,α,α ) coverge i probability to β; (b) If < 1/(2 + β), we have the stable covergeces i law, over the whole set Ω, as described i Theorems 1 (with Āt = ta) ad 3. The estimators ˆβ are agai ot rate-efficiet, although they do come close. I fact, usig the methods of Aït-Sahalia ad Jacod (2008), we ca show that Fisher s iformatio for estimatig β at stage satisfies (28) I A(log(1/ )) 2 β/2 σ β β/2 C β t for aother costat C β. Furthermore, i the (partial) statistical model where we observe the icremets provided, they are bigger tha α ad discard all others (here α > 0 ad 0 < < 1/2), Fisher s iformatio ow satisfies (29) I A(1 )2 (log(1/ )) 2 α β β C βt. So, our geeral estimators are almost [up to a log(1/ ) factor] rate-efficiet for the partial parametric statistical model. As for the complete model, the rate approaches the true rate by takig close to 1/2, but we caot take bigger tha 1/(2 + β), ad sice, i practice, β is ukow other tha beig less tha 2, a uiversal choice may be = 1/4, which is less striget tha the choice = 1/5 required i the geeral case. 4. Geeral Lévy processes. Let us ow cosider the case where X is a geeral Lévy process. Its characteristics are of the form (2) with b t = b, σ t = σ ad F t = F determiistic ad ot depedig o t. The, Assumptio 1 holds. As to Assumptio 2, it may or may ot hold, but if it does it takes a slightly simpler form because the everythig is idepedet of (ω, t). I

15 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 15 particular, Ā t = At for some costat A > 0. The two Theorems 1 ad 3 hold without modificatio, except that either {Āt > 0} = Ω for all t > 0, or {Āt > 0} = for all t, i which case those theorems are void of cotet. What is importat here, though, is that those results fail whe the assumptios we made are ot satisfied, eve with such a simple probabilistic structure for X. I order to see why Assumptio 2 is eeded, let us cosider a simpler but closely related statistical model. More precisely, suppose that we observe all big jumps of X up to time t; that is, X s with X s > α for all s t. A priori, this should give us more iformatio o the Lévy measure tha the origial observatio scheme where oly icremets (as opposed to jumps) are observed ad oly those bigger tha α are take ito cosideratio. I this statistical settig, the estimators (16) have o meaig, but we ca replace ˆβ with (30) where we have set (31) β (t,,α,α ) = log(u(,α) t /U(,α ) t ) log(α, /α) U(,α) t = s t 1 { Xs >α }. The estimators β are of course oly virtual sice there is o hope of actually observig the exact jumps of the process. But, i the rest of this sectio, we study the behavior of the estimators β i order to gai some isight o the ecessity of makig a restrictive assumptio o the Lévy measure F t if oe is to estimate β. We will see that such a assumptio is eeded eve uder these idealized circumstaces. Set (32) γ (,α) = F(α ). (33) Lemma 1. Let The: M(,α) t = 1 γ (,α) (U(,α) t γ (,α)t). (a) Each sequece of processes M(,α) coverges stably i law to a stadard Wieer process, idepedet of X; (b) If α < α, all limit poits of the sequece γ (,α )/γ (,α) are i [0,1]. Further, if this sequece coverges to γ, the the pair (M(,α), M(,α ) ) of processes coverges stably i law to a process (W,W ), which is idepedet of X ad a 2-dimesioal Wieer process with uit variaces 1 ad uit covariace γ.

16 16 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD Proof. The processes M = M(,α) ad M = M(,α ) are Lévy processes ad martigales, with jumps goig uiformly to 0, ad with predictable brackets M,M t = M,M t = t, M,M γ (,α t = ) γ (,α) t. Observe, also, that α α ; hece, γ (,α ) γ (,α). The remaiig results the follow [see Jacod ad Shiryaev (2003), Chapter VII]. (34) Theorem 6. If α > α ad γ(,α ) γ (,α) ( γ (,α ) coverges stably i law to a N(0, γ [0,1], the the sequece β (t,,α,α ) log(γ (,α)/γ (,α )) log(α /α) 1 γ t(log(α /α)) 2 ) variable, idepedet of X. This result is a simple cosequece of the previous lemma, ad its proof is the same as the proof of Theorem 1 oce the CLT for the processes U(,α) is established, which we will do later. So, the situatio seems geerally hopeless. These estimators are ot eve cosistet for estimatig the activity idex β of F because of bias, ad to remove the bias we have to kow the ratio γ (,α )/γ (,α) (or at least its asymptotic behavior i a precise way), ad, further, there is o CLT if this ratio does ot coverge (a fact which we do ot kow a priori, of course). The major difficulty comes from the possible erratic behavior of F ear 0. Ideed, we have (6) with β istead of β i t, but there are Lévy measures F satisfyig this, ad such that for ay r (0,β) we have x r F(x ) 0 for a sequece x 0 (depedig o r, of course). If F is such, the sequece γ (,α )/γ (,α) may have the whole of [0,1] as limit poits, depedig o the parameter values,α,α, ad i a completely ucotrolled way for the observer. So, we eed some additioal assumptio o F. Let us cosider two assumptios (the secod oe is stroger tha the first oe). Assumptio 3. F is regularly varyig at 0, with idex β (0,2). Assumptio 4. We have F(x) = A ( ) 1 (35) x β + o x β/2 as x 0, for some A > 0. Theorem 7. (a) Uder Assumptio 3, we have β (t,,α,α ) β. ) P

17 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 17 (b) Uder Assumptio 4, the variables β (β (t,,α,α ) β) coverge stably i law to a N(0, β α β α ta 2 (log(α /α)) ) variable, idepedet of X. 2 Proof. Assumptio 3 implies that γ (,α) ad γ (,α)/γ (,α ) (α /α) β, so the previous theorem yields (a). Assumptio 4 clearly implies γ (,α) log(γ (,α)/γ (,α )) log(α β, /α) ad also γ (,α) A/α β β, so (b) follows agai from the previous theorem. It may of course happe that Assumptio 3 or 4 fail ad evertheless the coclusios of the previous theorem hold for a particular choice of the parameters (,α,α ) or for a particular choice of the sequece. But, i view of Theorem 6 ad of the previous proof, these assumptios are ecessary if we wat those coclusios to hold for all choices of (,α,α ). Now, comig back to the origial realistic problem, for which oly icremets of X are observed. Assumptio 2, whe F t (ω,dx) = F(dx) for all (ω,t), is obviously stroger tha Assumptio 4, but ot much more. The eed of stroger assumptios for the origial problem comes from the fact that although whe we observe a large icremet i X it is with a high probability almost equal to a large jump. Nevertheless, the observatio of this jump is blurred by the Browia compoet ad also by a sum of very small jumps. This fact is also the reaso why we eed some restrictio o for the origial problem, whereas, here, ca be arbitrarily large. 5. Small sample bias correctio. By costructio, we are forced by the presece of a cotiuous semimartigale to rely o a small fractio of the sample (i.e., those icremets larger tha α ) for the purpose of estimatig β. As a result, the effective sample size utilized by the estimator ˆβ is small, eve if we sample at a relatively high frequecy. This situatio calls for a aalysis of the small sample behavior of the estimator. Such a small sample aalysis is out of reach i geeral but it ca be carried out explicitly for the model X t = σw t +θy t studied i Sectio 3, where Y is a symmetric β-stable process ad W is a Wieer process. Let g deote the desity of Y 1. Here, the process Y is stadardized by E(e iuyt ) = e t u β /2, so the limit β 2 correspods to the stadard ormal desity φ. Oe additioal step i the expasio (24) yields, as x +, g(x) = c β x β+1 + d ( ) β 1 (36) x 2β+1 + O x 3β+1

18 18 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD ad, for the tail of the distributio, (37) G(x) = P( Y 1 > x) = 2 + x g(v)dv = 2c β βx β + d β βx 2β + O ( 1 x 3β where the coefficiets of the expasio are ( ) Γ(β + 1) πβ Γ(2β + 1) (38) c β = si ad d β = si(πβ). 2π 2 8π This parametrizatio correspods i terms of the geeral otatio of the paper to (39) A t = A = 2θ β c β /β. Now, cosider the tail probability P at the cutoff level α. The probability P determies the limitig behavior of the Us, sice U(,α) t (t/ )P. We have So, with ( (40) P = 2 = α = G 1 σ α 1/2 1 θ 1/β (α/θ) 1/β ( α θ 1/β ) β u uβσ 1/2 = 1 + α ( ) x y g θ 1/β dx 1 σ 1/2 (1 (σ/α) 1/2 u) ( )) 1 σ α 1/2 u + u2 β(β + 1)σ α 2 ( ) y φ σ 1/2 dy g(v)dv φ(u)du φ(u) du. ), + O( 3/2 3 ) ad + uφ(u)du = 0 ad + u2 φ(u)du = 1, we see, from (37), that ) (1 + (41) P = 2c βθ β 1 β βα β + smaller terms. β(β + 1)σ2 2α d βθ β 1 β 2c β α β The behavior of P suggested by the leadig term i the expressio (2c β θ β /(βα β )) 1 β is the oe we have used to defie the estimator ˆβ i (16) by exploitig the depedece of that leadig term o α. The first correctio term (β(β +1)σ 2 /(2α 2 )) 1 2 i (41) is due to the iteractio betwee the Wieer ad the stable processes, while the secod (d β θ β /(2c β α β )) 1 β is due to the more accurate approximatio of the tail of the stable process i (36) compared to the leadig order term i (24).

19 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 19 To uderstad ituitively the eed for the first term, suppose that the cutoff level correspods to seve stadard deviatios of the cotiuous part of the semimartigale. There is very little probability that the Wieer process aloe will geerate a icremet that large. O the other had, whe we cout the icremets due to the jump process aloe, we are missig icremets of the sum of the cotiuous ad discotiuous parts where, say, the Wieer process is resposible for a oe stadard deviatio move, ad the jump process for a six stadard deviatio move, of the same sig. We are also missig icremets where the jump process gives a eight stadard deviatio move ad the Wieer process a oe stadard deviatio move, of the opposite sig. The two effects partly compesate each other ad ideed the term i u i (40) leads to a itegral whose value is zero. But the ext effect, i u 2, leads to a et icrease i the total umber of icremets that are larger tha the cutoff whe the iteractio betwee the Wieer ad jump processes is accouted for. Asymptotically, the first of the two correctig terms i (41) is the largest,, but i small samples a large value of the scalig parameter θ relative to σ ca make their magitudes comparable. Usig (41) at two differet values α ad α, we obtai sice (42) ˆβ β + 1 β 1 log(α /α) { β(β + 1)σ 2 2 ( 1 α 2 1 ) α d βθ β ( 1 2c β α β 1 ) α β 1 β This suggests a small sample bias correctio for the estimator ˆβ obtaied by subtractig a estimator of the two correctio terms o the right had side of (42) from ˆβ. As we will see i simulatios below, the two correctio terms are quite effective i practice. Further, we ote that the two correctio terms i (42), of respective orders 1 2 ad 1 β, are asymptotically egligible at the rate β/2 at which the cetral limit occurs. This is due to the restrictios o the choice of imposed by Theorem 2. Cosequetly, the bias-corrected estimator has the same asymptotic distributio as the origial estimator. More geerally, we have (43) ˆβ β + { 1 t 0 A sσs 2 ds log(α /α) β(β + 1) Ā t 2 t 0 + A2 s ds Ā t }. ( 1 α 2 1 ) α ( βd β 1 4c 2 β α β 1 ) α β 1 β }.

20 20 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD To implemet the bias correctio i practice, we eed to estimate the terms (1/Āt) t 0 A sσs 2 ds ad (1/Āt) t 0 A2 s ds. I the case of a stable symmetric process, A s = A ad so (1/Āt) t 0 A2 s ds = A = 2θβ c β /β. We ca the replace (1/Āt) t 0 A sσs 2 ds by (1/t) t 0 σ2 s ds ad use ay stadard estimator of the itegrated volatility. I geeral, we have U(,α) t 1 ( β α β Ā + 1 α 2Aσ2 G 1 (β) 1 2 (44) + 1 ) α β A2 G 2 (β) 1 β, (45) U(,α) t a 1 0 α β + a 1 1 α 2+β + a 1 2 α 2β, β where Ā = t 0 A sσs 2 ds, Aσ 2 = t 0 A sσs 2 ds ad A 2 = t 0 A2 s ds. We ca estimate the ukow coefficiets a 0, a 1 ad a 2 i expressio (45) by a straightforward liear regressio of β U(,α) t o 1/α β, 1/α 2+β ad 1/α 2β. For the purpose of ruig that regressio, we use differet cutoff levels α ad compute the correspodig umber of icremets exceedig that level, U(,α) t ad the first-stage estimate of β. Give estimates of the regressio coefficiets, we have a geeralized bias correctio procedure based o subtractig, from ˆβ, the terms o the right-had side of { ( 1 a1 1 ˆβ β log(α /α) a 0 α 2 1 ) α 2 + a ( 2 1 a 0 α β 1 )} (46) α β evaluated at the regressio estimates of a 0, a 1 ad a Mote Carlo simulatios. We ow report simulatio results documetig the fiite sample performace of the estimator ˆβ i fiite samples. We calibrate the values to be realistic for a very liquid stock. We use a observatio legth of T = 1 day, cosistig of 6.5 hours of tradig (i.e., = 23,400 secods). The averages ad stadard deviatios of the estimator ˆβ, which is based o two differet levels of trucatio α ad α, are reported i Table 1 for various values of β up to 1.5 ad iclude a cotiuous (Browia) part. The table reports the results of 5000 simulatios. The data geeratig process is the stochastic volatility model dx t = σ t dw t + θ dy t, with σ t = v 1/2 t, dv t = κ(η v t )dt + γv 1/2 t db t + dj t, E[dW t db t ] = ρdt, η 1/2 = 0.25, γ = 0.5, κ = 5, ρ = 0.5. J is a compoud Poisso jump process with jumps that are uiformly distributed o [ 30%,30%] ad X 0 = 1. The jump process Y is either a β-stable process with β = 1.5, 1.25, 1.0, 0.75, 0.5 ad 0.25, or a compoud Poisso process (which has fiite activity ad is marked β = 0 i the table) with fixed jump size The estimator is implemeted with

21 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 21 Table 1 Mote Carlo simulatios of the estimator ˆβ based o two levels of trucatio for β-stable processes ad a compoud Poisso process (β = 0) Samplig 1 sec 1 sec 1 sec 1 sec 5 sec tail probability 0.25% 0.5% 1.0% 2.5% 1.0% β = 1.5 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.26) (0.18) (0.13) (0.08) (0.25) Asymp stdev (0.26) (0.18) (0.13) (0.08) (0.24) β = 1.25 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.23) (0.16) (0.11) (0.07) (0.19) Asymp stdev (0.23) (0.16) (0.11) (0.07) (0.19) β = 1.0 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.19) (0.14) (0.10) (0.06) (0.14) Asymp stdev (0.19) (0.14) (0.10) (0.06) (0.14) β = 0.75 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.16) (0.11) (0.08) (0.05) (0.11) Asymp stdev (0.16) (0.11) (0.08) (0.05) (0.11) β = 0.5 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.13) (0.09) (0.06) (0.04) (0.08) Asymp stdev (0.13) (0.09) (0.06) (0.04) (0.08) β = 0.25 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.09) (0.06) (0.04) (0.04) (0.05) Asymp stdev (0.09) (0.06) (0.04) (0.04) (0.05) β = 0 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.02) (0.01) (0.007) (0.005) (0.01) α = 5η, α = 10η ad = Give η ad α, the scale parameter θ (or equivaletly A) of the stable process i simulatios is calibrated to deliver the various values of the tail probability P( Y t α ) reported i the colums of the table; for the Poisso process, it is the value of the arrival rate parameter λ that is set to geerate the desired level of jump tail probability. I each row, the top umber is the average value of the estimator ˆβ across the simulatios, after iclusio of the bias correctio discussed i Sectio 5, while the umber below, i paretheses, is the stadard deviatio of the estimator across the same simulatios. The third umber i paretheses is the estimated asymptotic stadard error based o the limitig distributio give i the sectios above. A higher tail probability i the colums has the effect of geeratig more icremets from the jump process that exceed the cutoff level, which makes more observatios available ad correspodigly reduces the stadard deviatio of the estimates. As the results show, ˆβ picks up o average fairly accurately the true value of β. As β gets too close to 2, the β-stable jump process starts to approximate

22 22 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD Fig. 1. Mote Carlo distributios of the estimator ˆβ based o two levels of trucatio for β-stable processes (0 < β < 2). too closely the behavior of the Browia motio ad the performace of the estimator deteriorates. Further simulatios (ot reported to save space) suggest that the estimator is ot overly sesitive to the selectio of the trucatio levels (α,α ) withi a reasoable rage. Histograms of the distributio of the estimator ˆβ are show i Figure 1 for the same values of β; the figures are based o the 1% level of jump tail probability. The histogram reports the raw, ustadardized, values of ˆβ, which are ot expected to be asymptotically ormal ulike the stadardized versios.

23 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 23 Fig. 2. Mote Carlo distributio of the estimator ˆβ based o two levels of trucatio for a compoud Poisso process (β = 0). A special metio should be made about the compoud Poisso case, which correspods to β = 0 ad does ot satisfy Assumptio 2. As discussed i Remark 8, there is o cetral limit theorem i this case, ad ˆβ should be equal to 0 for large eough. Ituitively, whe there is a small umber or large jumps, the same large icremets remai i the sample at the two trucatio levels α ad α, ad the ratio of U evaluated at α to U evaluated at α i (16) is equal to 1. This is what happes i simulatios i the vast majority of cases, as show by the histogram for β = 0 reported i Figure 2. The asymptotic distributio is a accurate guide for the small samples as show i the stadardized distributios i Figure 3. The estimator i the histograms is stadardized accordig to the asymptotic distributio give i Theorem 3, ad the solid curve i the figures is the limitig N(0,1) desity. As the figures show, the asymptotic distributio is a fairly accurate guide for the small samples. This is i spite of the relatively small umber of (large) icremets that are effectively used by the estimator, combied with the facts that some large icremets are kept, eve though they may ot have cotaied a large jump, or, coversely, smaller icremets may have cotaied two or more large, cacellig, jumps, or the Wieer process may have combied with the pure jump process to produce a larger icremet. Asymptotically, these effects do ot show up at the leadig order i but are preset i small samples ad appear to be effectively captured by the bias correctig term. Fially, we compare i simulatios the performace of the two estimators ˆβ (based o two trucatio levels) ad ˆβ (based o two samplig frequecies) with the same experimet desig as above. The samplig frequecy is = 1 secod, the legth of observatio T = 1 day or 23,400 secods. The

24 24 Y. AÏT-SAHALIA AND J. JACOD Fig. 3. Stadardized Mote Carlo ad asymptotic distributios of the estimator ˆβ based o two levels of trucatio for β-stable processes (0 < β < 2). tail probability is 1.0%, the middle value i Table 1. The results are show i Table 2. The estimator ˆβ teds to have a larger stadard deviatio tha ˆβ ad is slightly biased. For these reasos, we have focused o the estimator ˆβ ad emphasize its use i the empirical applicatio that follows. 7. Empirical applicatio. We ow implemet the estimator ˆβ for the two most actively traded stocks i the Dow Joes Idustrial Average idex, Itel (INTC) ad Microsoft (MSFT), ad each tradig day i The data source is the TAQ database. Each day, we collect all trasactios o the NYSE or NASDAQ, from 9:30 am util 4:00 pm, for each oe of these

25 ESTIMATING JUMP ACTIVITY 25 Table 2 Compariso of the two estimators of β i Mote Carlo simulatios for β-stable processes ad a compoud Poisso process (β = 0) Two trucatio levels ˆβ Two samplig frequecies ˆβ β = 1.0 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.10) (0.13) β = 0.5 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.06) (0.09) β = 0 Sample mea Sample stdev (0.007) (0.02) stocks. We sample i caledar time every 5 ad 15 secods. We use filters to elimiate clear data errors (price set to zero, etc.) ad all trasactios i the origial record that are later corrected, cacelled or otherwise ivalidated, as is stadard i the empirical high frequecy literature. The two time series are plotted i Figure 4. Figure 5 cotais a histogram of the tails of the ucoditioal desities of the log-returs from the two stocks. Comparig the two figures, we see that it is quite possible to have a stadard time series plot display little evidece of large moves (Figure 5), while the tails of the distributio look substatially fatter tha ormal (Figure 5) as cofirmed by the descriptive statistics i Table 3 for the two log-returs series. All together, this evidece poits i the directio of may small, active jumps of the type that we seek to ucover usig our estimator of β. More formally, we compute the statistic Ŝ of Aït-Sahalia ad Jacod (2009) to test for the presece of jumps i the data. Over the differet samplig frequecies cosidered (ragig from 2 secods to 1 miute), the largest value of the statistic Ŝ we obtai for the differet quarters ad the two stocks is Sice the asymptotic value of Ŝ is 1 (resp. 2) whe jumps Fig. 4. Time series of INTC ad MSFT stock prices, all tradig days i 2006.