S-11: Tacoma Link Extension to Tacoma Community College



Similar documents
R-06: Innovation and Technology Fund

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

5.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2015)

Introduction to Station Area Planning The Charlotte Story

Southwest Light Rail Transit Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

When is BRT the Best Option? 1:30 2:40 p.m.

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis

Public Hearing. City Council Study Session. February 11, 2013

LRT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

Eagle Commuter Rail Denver, Colorado Final Design (Based upon information received by FTA in November 2010)

Tier II FEIS Appendix G DEIS Comments and Responses Page G-158 SR 167 Puyallup to SR 509


Integrating GO RER and SmartTrack. Leslie Woo, Chief Planning Officer February 10, 2016

FTA OVERSIGHT PROGRAMS

Draft Non Transportation Performance Measures Including Related Qualitative Assessment of Example Sections

System Access Issue Paper (Draft)

Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

ATTACHMENT TO NOTICE TO FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEM VEHICLE SUPPLIERS REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI 001)

Railyard Alternatives and I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study. Planning Commission February 6, 2014

SR-18 Corridor Improvements in Wood County

Figure L3: Level 2 SR 99 Elevated Light Rail Alternative Detail - 1 of 4

Questions and Answers about the Orange Bus/Rail Investment Plan

Alternatives Presentation Meeting Middlebury WCRS(23)

Tier 1 Strategies. WV Route 14 Corridor Management Plan

Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT

NORTH RED AND PURPLE MODERNIZATION PROJECT

Multi Modal Roadway Transportation Impact Fees and Asset Value

Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives

MEMORANDUM. Robert Nichols, Acting Corridor Design Manager Northgate Link Extension

Improving Access in Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus Executive Summary

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

Appendix J Santa Monica Travel Demand Forecasting Model Trip Generation Rates

GUIDANCE FOR TRANSIT FINANCIAL PLANS

Effect on structures. Uniform settlement - no concerns. Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain

Proposed Service Design Guidelines

Addendum to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

South Florida East Coast Corridor (SFECC) Projects. February 7, 2012

Los Angeles Metro Rapid

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

DRAFT Freight Performance Measures

3.1 Historical Considerations

SAFETEA-LU TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS BILL SUMMARY

L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T S O F F I C E

BRT BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

3.11 Utilities Affected Environment Environmental Consequences

Strategic Regional Transit Plan

PART II SCHEDULE. Scope of Services. Special Terms and Conditions. Virginia Railway Express

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project

Claret Consulting 18 December 2015

INDOT Long Range Plan

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B13-01

Mount Royal College Transit Service Plan

INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN NOTIFICATION FORM / PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

FLC 4th Annual Summer Research Symposium: Planes, Trains, Ports & Highways What Keeps Florida Moving?

Stouffville Corridor Rail Service Expansion

APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

Route Development Plan

July 2010 Met Council contributes $1 million to small business loan fund More Downtown Downtown Minneapolis St. Paul

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Scope of Work. April 18, 2012

Planning Level Cost Estimation Tool. User s Manual

Background and Goals for the Project

Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before and After Study. N 34th Street to N 50th Street

Jess Linn Principal Planner, Development Services Division Miami-Dade Regulatory and Economic Resources

Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 Madison, WI (608) Fax: (608)

The LYNX Transit Master Plan. METROPLAN Orlando Presentation

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

Case Study REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT (RTD) DENVER, COLORADO

Chapter 3: Third Street Light Rail

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

3.09 Public Safety and Security

Welcome! Purpose of Tonight s Meeting. Informational Open House to discuss two City projects: Goal is to LISTEN TO YOU

Surface Transportation Program (STP)

Alternatives Design Report. Draft

Calgary Transit Environmental Stewardship

North Avenue Corridor Study. Advisory Committee Meeting #5 June 11, 2014

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

Brookdale Site. CB6 Update April 1, 2015

Section 6 Traffic Analysis

Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

Growth Targets and Mode Split Goals for Regional Centers

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

Mayors Welcome Strong Surrey Votes Yes Coalition Support. Yes Vote Would Vastly Improve Transit and Transportation in Fast Growing City

Implementation Strategy

Transportation Alternatives

SALT LAKE AND OGDEN/ LAYTON URBAN AREA. Federal Transit Administration (FTA)

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Budget Forecast estimates that housing

Transcription:

Project Number S-11 Subarea Pierce Primary Mode Light Rail Facility Type Corridor Length 3.65 miles Version ST Board Workshop Date Last Modified 11-25-2015 PROJECT AREA AND REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project would extend Tacoma Link from Downtown Tacoma to Tacoma Community College and include modifications to existing and planned Tacoma Link infrastructure. Note: The elements included in this representative project will be refined during future phases of project development and are subject to change. REGIONAL LIGHT RAIL SPINE Does this project help complete the light rail spine? CAPITAL COST Cost in Millions of 2014 $ RIDERSHIP 2040 daily boardings KEY ATTRIBUTES No $642 $687 6,000 8,000 PROJECT ELEMENTS Approximately 3.65 miles of mostly at-grade light rail, with a portion of elevated track over SR-16 Four center platform stations: S Union Avenue, S. State Street, S Proctor Street, S Stevens Street Three side platform stations: S Ainsworth Ave, S Pearl St, Tacoma Community College Stations accommodate 1-car trains (train cars will be longer than existing cars) Widening of existing right-of-way to provide for exclusive, center-running track along S 19 th Street from MLK Jr Way to SR 16; from SR 16 to TCC, the track will run parallel to S 19 th Street, to the north, within exclusive ROW; the crossing of SR 16 will be on an independent bridge Reconstruction of S 19 th Street from S Wilkeson Street to SR 16 Grind and overlay existing roadway from MLK Jr Way to S Wilkeson Street New vehicle storage and washing facility at the project terminus Purchase of 16 new one-car trains (98.5 in length) to provide service for the extension and replace the existing fleet Expansion of and modifications to the existing maintenance facility to appropriately serve new vehicles Added a northbound track from Union Station to the Tacoma Dome Station via Puyallup Avenue Extension of 5 existing/planned station platforms (counting both center and side platforms individually); these include stations that are currently under design as part of the Tacoma Link Extension Peak headways: 6 minutes 1 percent for art per ST policy Non-motorized access facilities (bicycle/pedestrian), transit-oriented development (TOD)/planning due diligence, and sustainability measures (see separate document titled Common Project Elements ) Page 1 of 6

KEY ATTRIBUTES NOT INCLUDED See separate document titled Common Project Elements ISSUES & RISKS This project will require replacement of the entire Tacoma Link fleet Light rail currently operates in Tacoma and specific station area standards are codified; light rail mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan Integration of service with ST2 planned extension Page 2 of 6

Sound Transit has developed a conceptual scope of work for this candidate project for the purpose of generating a representative range of costs, both capital and operating; and benefits, including ridership forecasts, TOD potential, multi-modal access and others. This information is being developed to assist the Sound Transit Board as it develops an ST3 system plan, including phasing of investments and financial plan, for voter consideration. Final decisions on project elements (e.g., alignment, profile, number of stations, station locations, and number of parking stalls) will be determined after completion of system planning, project level environmental review, and preliminary engineering during which additional opportunities for public participation will be provided. Therefore, this scope definition should not be construed as a commitment that all representative features will be included in the final developed project. Long Description: This project would construct an extension of Tacoma Link from Downtown Tacoma to Tacoma Community College. Leaving the St. Joseph Medical Center Station, the alignment would follow MLK Jr Way to S 19 th Street. It would then travel along S 19 th Street to the existing transit center at Tacoma Community College (S 19 th Street and S Mildred Street). Modifications to existing Tacoma Link infrastructure would be performed to accommodate one-car trains that are longer than the existing trains. Assumptions: Projected ridership along Tacoma Link from the Tacoma Dome to Tacoma Community College cannot be accommodated with single car trains at 10 minute headways; all trains (existing and new) must be one-car trains; service would operate at 6 minute headways during the peak periods and 10 minute headways during the off peak periods Existing single track alignment is not sufficient for operations; installation of a second track from Union Station to the Tacoma Dome Station via Puyallup Avenue Some existing platforms are not long enough to accommodate longer (98.5 in length) one-car trains Existing maintenance facility will need to be retrofitted to appropriately serve new vehicles Stations include: shelters, signage, lighting, seating, ticket vending machines, CCTVs Center platform stations were used where possible Side platforms were used when alignment is side running and in-lane Active signal control is used to minimize delay at signalized intersections For non-motorized station access allowances, all stations are categorized as Urban LRT stations Environmental: Sound Transit will complete project-level state and federal environmental reviews as necessary; provide mitigation for significant impacts; obtain and meet the conditions of all required permits and approvals; and strive to exceed compliance and continually improve its environmental performance. Utilities: Utility relocation as needed to complete the project, including fiber optics, sewer, water, overhead electric/communications, etc. Right-of-Way and Property Acquisition: Property acquisitions anticipated at stations and for the vehicle storage and washing facility and traction power substations Potential Permits/Approvals Needed: Building permits: Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing Utility connection permits Construction-related permits (clearing and grading, stormwater management, street use, haul routes, use of city right-of-way) Master use Land use approvals (Conditional use, design review, site plans, Comprehensive Plan or development code consistency, Special Use Permits) All required local, state, and federal environmental permits NEPA/SEPA and related regulations Project Dependencies: Completion of Tacoma Link to St. Joseph Medical Center Ability to extend all existing station platforms to accommodate one-car trains Page 3 of 6

Potential Project Partners: City of Tacoma Transit partners serving project: Pierce Transit Tacoma Community College FTA WSDOT Page 4 of 6

Cost: Sound Transit has developed a conceptual scope of work for this candidate project for the purpose of generating a representative range of costs, both capital and operating; and benefits, including ridership forecasts, TOD potential, multi-modal access and others. This information is being developed to assist the Sound Transit Board as it develops an ST3 system plan, including phasing of investments and financial plan, for voter consideration. Final decisions on project elements (e.g., alignment, profile, number of stations, station locations, and number of parking stalls) will be determined after completion of system planning, project level environmental review, and preliminary engineering during which additional opportunities for public participation will be provided. Therefore, this scope definition should not be construed as a commitment that all representative features will be included in the final developed project. In Millions of 2014$ ITEM COST COST WITH RESERVE Agency Administration $34.55 $36.97 Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Review $16.31 $17.46 Final Design & Specifications $31.35 $33.55 Property Acquisition & Permits $62.44 $66.81 Construction $319.78 $342.16 Construction Management $28.22 $30.19 Third Parties $6.47 $6.92 Vehicles $111.26 $119.05 Contingency $31.35 $33.55 Total $641.73 $686.65 Design Basis: Conceptual The costs expressed above include allowances for TOD planning and due diligence, Sustainability, Bus/rail integration facilities, and Non-Motorized Access. These allowances, as well as the costs for Parking Access included above, are reflected in the following table. Property acquisition costs are not included in the table below, but are included within the total project cost above. ITEM COST COST WITH RESERVE TOD planning and due diligence $0.84 $0.90 Sustainability $13.93 $14.91 Parking access N/A N/A Non-motorized (bicycle/pedestrian) access $30.76 $32.91 Bus/rail integration facilities N/A N/A Page 5 of 6

Evaluation Measures: MEASURE MEASUREMENT/RATING NOTES Regional Light Rail Spine Does project help complete regional light rail spine? No Ridership 2040 daily station boardings Capital Cost Cost in Millions of 2014 $ Annual O&M Cost Cost in Millions of 2014 $ Travel Time In-vehicle travel time along the project (segment) Reliability Quantitative/qualitative assessment of alignment/route in exclusive right-of-way System Integration Qualitative assessment of issues and effects related to connections to existing local bus service and potential future integration opportunities Ease of Non-motorized Access Qualitative assessment of issues and effects related to non-motorized modes Percent of Non-motorized Mode of Access Percent of daily boardings 6,000 8,000 $642 $687 $11.16 16 min Medium-High Medium-Low Medium-Low 70-80% At-grade crossings Low to medium-low number of existing daily transit connections Tacoma Community College to S Cushman Avenue Medium to low intersection density providing nonmotorized access, with large parcels as barriers Connections to PSRC-designated Regional Centers Number of PSRC-designated regional growth and manufacturing/industrial centers served 2 centers Regional growth centers: Tacoma Downtown, University Place Land Use and Development/TOD Potential Quantitative/qualitative assessment of adopted Plans & Policies and zoning compatible with transit-supportive development within 0.5 mile of potential stations Medium Moderate support in local and regional plans; approx. 25% land is compatibly zoned Qualitative assessment of real estate market support for development within 1 mile of potential corridor Density of activity units (population and employment for 2014 and 2040) within 0.5 mile of potential station areas Socioeconomic Benefits Existing minority / low-income populations within 0.5 mile of potential station areas 2014 and 2040 population within 0.5 mile of potential station areas 2014 and 2040 employment within 0.5 mile of potential station areas Medium Pop/acre = 2014: 7; 2040: 11 Emp/acre = 2014: 6; 2040: 10 Pop + Emp/acre = 2014: 13; 2040: 21 38% Minority; 17% Low-Income Pop: 2014: 17,000; 2040: 25,400 Emp: 2014: 13,000; 2040: 23,200 For additional information on evaluation measures, see http://soundtransit3.org/document-library Moderate market support Page 6 of 6