Section 6 Traffic Analysis

Similar documents
9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. April 24, 2015

Comment #1: Provide an interchange at Route 7 and Farm Market Road/White Gate Road. This was studied in the late 1990 s.

Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Highway Division Ten Park Plaza, Boston, MA A Guide on Traffic Analysis Tools

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

Appendix E Traffic Impact Analysis

Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project

8+ %!0"% 8+1!%"'$%,$"$

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

PROGRAM FOR ARTERIAL SYSTEM SYNCHRONIZATION (PASS) STANDARD SCOPE OF WORK, SCHEDULE AND BUDGET

Improving Access in Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus Executive Summary

SR-18 Corridor Improvements in Wood County

MEMORANDUM. Robert Nichols, Acting Corridor Design Manager Northgate Link Extension

Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High

ENGINEERING REPORT. College Street: Interstate 85 to Donahue Drive Traffic Signal System Feasibility Study Auburn, Alabama

INDOT Long Range Plan

Definitions. For the purposes of this rule chapter the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly shows otherwise:

Transportation Impact Assessment Guidelines

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS HANDBOOK VOLUME I METHODOLOGIES & REQUIREMENTS

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

Traffic. Analysis. Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook Version 1.1. Traffic Engineering Division

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

Highway 138 Corridor Solutions Study Roseburg, Oregon. Technical Memorandum #4: Concept Development and Screening DRAFT

Mercer County Multi-Modal Transportation Plan Year 2025 Travel Demand Model

CHAPTERTWO. Alternatives 2.1 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Simulating Traffic for Incident Management and ITS Investment Decisions

General Obligation Bond Projects FYE

Corridor Goals and Objectives

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) Guidelines

Mobility Management Plan Study of the Busch Boulevard Corridor

TRANSPORTATION MODELLING IN CALGARY

City of Kamloops Notre Dame Corridor Access Plan

TH 23 Access Management Study Richmond to Paynesville

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

Downtown Louisville Two-Way Street Study

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

Major and Minor Schemes

Lawson Outline Plan External Traffic Analysis Working Paper

FHWA Colorado Division Control of Access to the Interstate and its Right-of-Way February 2005

Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan

Accident Analysis of Sheridan Road between Isabella Street and South Boulevard

Executive Summary. Literature/Community Review. Traffic Flows and Projections. Final Report Truck Route System for Miami-Dade County CORRADINO

The Fresno COG Travel Demand Forecasting Model How the Pieces Fit Together

Transportation Impact Analysis and Mitigation Plan Procedures Manual

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD & NORTHLAKE BLVD. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Transportation Management Plan Template

2013 QUALITY/ LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK

Treasure Valley Electrical Plan

3.1 Historical Considerations

Texas Case Studies in Access Management. Ed Hard, TTI

Route Development Plan

Strategic Regional Transit Plan

The Northwest Arkansas Travel Demand Model

Truck Diversion Forecasts. DRAFT Executive Summary

APPENDIX J TRAFFIC STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Intersection Cost Comparison Spreadsheet User Manual ROUNDABOUT GUIDANCE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

DRAFT Freight Performance Measures

analysis needs be met at the push of a button?

Access Management Manual

Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before and After Study. N 34th Street to N 50th Street

Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Studies 8 th Revision

AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

A23 CHEQUERS ROUNDABOUT, HORLEY: PREDESTRIAN AND CYCLING CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

1500 Hamilton Avenue Primrose Daycare Center Project

Nearly 38,000 vehicles cross the Shinnecock Canal on Sunrise Highway (NYS Route 27) daily, during peak summer months.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Maryland Invests $845 Million in New Highway and Bridge Projects

Transport Construction Authority Report for Auburn Stabling Project. Traffic Impact Assessment

DISTRICT 3 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN CHECKLIST

Adaptive controlled traffic lights - a progress report from Uppsala. Sampo Hinnemo

Addendum to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Traffic Analysis Handbook

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PANEL ON PLANNING, LANDS AND WORKS

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 218 Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 208A

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

Belmont Street Bridge Rehabilitation Project

City of Rockville Regional Development Impacts: Transportation Capacity Analysis. June, 2013

Presentation to Knox County Commission Monday, February 23, 2015

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

Railway Crossing Information System

CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

A Short Course on Techniques for Determining Construction Related Road User Costs

Transcription:

Section 6 Traffic Analysis

Traffic Operations of the Preferred Network Alternative After the Preferred Network was identified and confirmed by local policy makers and area residents, detailed traffic analysis was conducted. The purpose of analyzing the traffic operations of the preferred network was to gain an understanding of the regional needs. The traffic evaluation also provided an opportunity to conduct a comparative analysis of travel demand models and system improvement scenarios that could occur under the build-out condition in 2030. Several transportation system improvement scenarios were analyzed in this study. When considering the future condition, it is uncertain if all anticipated improvements to the transportation system will occur by the build out date of 2030. Aside from ACHD roads in the project area, substantial improvements will be needed on Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) facilities. The majority of the roads in the project area are constructed and maintained by ACHD. In order to accommodate anticipated future traffic volumes, improvements to the existing transportation system will be required. Expanding large transportation facilities and providing additional crossings of the Boise River are costly improvements. Thus, funding scenarios that consider different future improvement conditions are analyzed in this study to illustrate the need for comprehensive system improvements. Elected officials unanimously agreed that funding and construction of additional State infrastructure in the study area is essential. Refer to Section 7 for further discussion. State Highway 55 Under Current Conditions 37

Study Intersections The Northwest Foothills study focuses on existing and future intersections between State Highway 16 to the west, State Highway 55 to the east, Chinden Boulevard to the south and the Ada County line to the north. The 2008 existing conditions analysis included seventeen intersections. The 2030 future conditions analysis included five additional intersections within the Northwest Foothills development area. The intersections of SH 16 & SH 44, SH 16 & Beacon Light Road and SH 55 & West Brookside Lane are proposed grade separated intersections and were not included in the 2030 future conditions analysis. Grade-separated intersections and High Capacity Intersections (HCI) were not analyzed as part of this study, but are considered in concurrent studies. Weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes were collected between 2005 and 2007 and were used to develop a base model in Synchro 7 (accepted traffic microsimulation modeling software) for existing intersection analysis. The Northwest Foothills Traffic Analysis Memorandum included in the appendix discusses the process for analyzing intersections as part of the study. SimTraffic Output for a Study Intersection Study Roadways The Northwest Foothills study area focuses on existing and future roadways between State Highway 16 to the west, State Highway 55 to the east, Chinden Boulevard to the south and the Ada County line to the north. The roadways that were assessed as part of this study were identified based on existing and future traffic volumes and needs described in previous studies. The primary study roadways for the Northwest Foothills Transportation Study were: SH 55 SH 16 Chinden Boulevard (US 20/26) State Street (SH 44) Eagle Road Linder Road Palmer/Hartley Road Beacon Light Road Floating Feather Road Future Roadways identified by the Study Eagle Corridor VISSIM VISSIM Simulation Conducted for Eagle Rd & Floating Feather Rd A microsimulation model was developed for visualization purposes for the Eagle Road corridor from SH 44 to Beacon Light Road. This model was developed to reinforce the results from the Synchro Analysis. VISSIM gives the ability to show 3-D animation and show the intersections working as a system. This corridor was critical to the project, so a visual representation of the results was an important element. The 3-D visualizations were used for presentation purposes and can be used in the future for analysis purposes if a calibration effort is conducted for existing conditions. 38

Existing Intersection and Lane Configurations 39

Analysis of the Preferred Network Traffic Volumes Once a Preferred Network was chosen through the process identified in Section 5, Roadway Network Evaluation, an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) threshold analysis was performed to determine the need for future roadway improvements beyond those improvements assumed in the preliminary preferred alternative. Suggested ADT Thresholds used for Analysis The ADT threshold analysis assumed an LOS D for SH 16 and SH 55 and an LOS E for the remainder of the roads analyzed (FDOT procedures are explained in the appendix). A comparison of the ADT link volumes provided in the travel demand model to the ADT thresholds resulted in the need for additional roadway improvements on portions of Chinden Boulevard (US 20/26), SH 44 and SH 55. Future Intersection Configurations Intersection configurations for the build out year of 2030 were determined using the total number of lanes identified in the travel demand models, the number of lanes per leg for the study intersections listed in the ACHD Capitol Improvements Plan (CIP), as well as additional lane configuration needs based on turn volume thresholds and overall intersection operations. All intersections were assumed to be signalized in 2030 with the exception of the two study intersections on Aerie Lane, as well as the intersection of Floating Feather and Ballantyne Road and the intersection of Eagle Road and Willow Creek Road. The proposed grade separated intersections on State Highway 16 and State Highway 55 were not analyzed as part of the 2030 full build scenario. There are three intersections within the study area that were analyzed as traditional signalized intersections as well as high capacity intersections. State Highway 44 and Linder Road, State Highway 44 and State Highway 55, and State Highway 55 and Beacon Light Road are all locations where the use of a traditional signalized intersection indicates substantial delays and queuing. The operations at these intersections warrant the use of non-traditional configurations that provide for more efficient intersection operations and increased capacity. Continuous Flow Intersections (CFI) have been proposed at all three of these locations and have been analyzed in depth in the COMPASS High Volume Intersection Report, adopted June, 2008. The intersection of Hill Road and SH 55 requires further study to accommodate the City of Eagle s desire for a gateway into the downtown area. Future Lane Configurations Preliminary roadway capacity needs for the study roadways of the Preferred Network were identified based on the ADT threshold analysis. This approach provided the preliminary needs of the transportation system without constraints. In some locations, needs were identified beyond future planned improvements accepted by regional policy makers. This required input by policy makers to identify necessary constraints or anticipated roadway needs for the future condition. Final lane configurations for the Preferred Network were approved by regional policy makers in order to achieve regional agreement for right-of-way (ROW) preservation. 40

Traffic Analysis Findings An analysis of the existing study intersections shows that the majority of the intersections operate at an acceptable level of service with average delays of less than 40 seconds per vehicle. The two unsignalized intersections of Palmer Lane and State Highway 44 and Beacon Light Road and State Highway 16 operate at a Level of Service F with delays exceeding 90 seconds, but these delays represent the worst movement at the intersection and not the intersection as a whole. Once a Preferred Network Alternative was chosen, an analysis of the traffic operations for the final Preferred Network Alternative was conducted. This analysis shows that the future intersections north of Beacon Light Road operate at an acceptable level of service with average delays of less than 30 seconds. The two study intersections along Aerie Lane, as well as the intersection of Eagle Road and Willow Creek will operate efficiently as unsignalized intersections. System traffic operations for the Preferred Network are shown on page 42. A map of the traffic operations is shown on page 43. A map showing the final intersection configurations is shown on page 44. It was determined that additional capacity was needed on portions of Chinden Boulevard, State Highway 44 and State Highway 55. The final preferred roadway network alternative includes six lanes on Chinden Boulevard between SH 16 and Cloverdale Road. State Highway 44 includes six lanes east of SH 16. The final Preferred Network Alternative also includes six lanes on SH 55 between SH 44 and Cloverdale Road. These recommendations are consistent with the current findings of the ongoing US 20/26 and SH 44 corridor studies being conducted by COMPASS and ITD. Lane Configurations of the Preferred Network are shown in the map on page 45. 41

The total number of lanes represents the total cross section of lanes needed for each leg of the intersection based on model data and operational analysis. This includes the number of through lanes and turn lanes required for directional traffic as well as the number of receiving lanes. For example, at the intersection of Beacon Light Road and Eagle Road the total number of lanes required for the East leg of the intersection is four, which includes a westbound through, left and right turn lane and an eastbound receiving lane. The total number of lanes for the existing scenario is the total number of lanes that currently exists in the field. The proposed scenario includes existing and future study intersections and represents the 2030 full build scenario for the preferred network alternative. Intersection operations for each intersection is shown in the LOS column. Level of service is based on the amount of time spent waiting at an intersection, which is shown in the delay column. 42

Preferred Network Alternative Intersection Operations 43

Preferred Network Alternative Intersection Configurations 44

Preferred Network Alternative Lane Configurations 45

Downstream Impacts With 24,000 housing units planned in the Northwest Foothills area, there are roadway segments outside the study area where traffic from the Northwest Foothills area increases volumes by 20% or more during the peak hour. This impact occurs primarily along corridors already identified and planned for the purpose of carrying regional traffic (Purple Sage/Beacon Light, SH 16, SH 55, Linder Road, Eagle Road and State Street (SH 44)). Although a 20% or greater impact is projected on a roadway segment, this does not mean that this traffic is detrimental and will cause failure to the road or transportation system. The roadways may have the ability to absorb this impact and still not require additional widening beyond the CIP. The development of the potential Extraordinary Impact Fee boundary requires a review of this information so ACHD can establish the boundary area that includes future projects. A preliminary list of future projects, which is included in the appendix, will help ACHD staff to establish the Extraordinary Impact Fee program and boundary as well as determine fee calculations for this area. State Highway 55 (SH 55) from Beacon Light Road and State Highway 44 (SH 44) Through development of the final Preferred Network in the study area, two main alternatives have been identified for this section of SH 55 by the Northwest Foothills Transportation Study and by the independent study being conducted by the SH 55 Consortium: 6 lane arterial with at-grade intersections (Northwest Foothills Study and Eagle Comprehensive Plan Assumption) 4 lane expressway with grade-separated intersections (SH 55 Consortium) Conclusions from both studies show, from a traffic analysis perspective, either alternative would perform adequately. The alternative presented in this study includes a 6 lane SH 55 arterial with a grade-separated intersection at Beacon Light Road, a continuous flow intersection at SH 55 and SH 44, and at-grade intersections at SH 55 and Floating Feather Road and SH 55 and Hill Road. The Northwest Foothills alternative is based on the following: ITD s preference for intersection configurations City of Eagle s desire for Hill Road to become a gateway into Eagle Downtown This alternative provides a solution to help address future development and transportation needs by utilizing the best information and recommendations available. As land use planning and other planning efforts including those along SH 55 are confirmed and additional details emerge, some specifics may change or be modified over time. 46

Dry Creek Road and Cartwright Road Impacts During the first Joint Coordination Meeting for this project, there was an inquiry about the impacts to Dry Creek Road and Cartwright Road and what would be done to ensure that this impact was addressed. Large volumes of traffic are not planned or intended for this area. Traffic coming from SH 55 and Dry Creek Ranch are expected to divert down Seaman s Gulch Road. If larger than expected volumes occur, ACHD will have to address this with traffic control measures to make the route onto Cartwright Road less desirable and less appealing for this traffic. Specific measures have not been established at this time but will be investigated further if conditions warrant. Roundabout Feasibility in the Study Area The DRAFT Roundabout Application Guidelines for Ada County (ACHD, 2007) were used as a screening process to evaluate existing and future intersections as potential locations for roundabouts in the Northwest Foothills. The siting guidelines identify locations where roundabouts are generally inappropriate, may be particularly advantageous, and where additional analysis will likely be required to assess the suitability of a particular site. Potential Roundabout Locations in the Study Area (Available at a larger scale in the appendix) The majority of existing and future intersections within the study area were eliminated as potential sites for roundabouts due to the guidelines for locations where installing a roundabout is generally not acceptable in Ada County. The following six study intersections were selected as potential locations for roundabouts: Eagle Road & Willow Creek Willow Creek & Aerie Lane/M3 Arterial West Brookside Lane & Collector 2 (west of SH 55 interchange) Floating Feather Road & Ballantyne Road Aerie Lane & the Western North-South Collector Aerie Lane & the Eastern North-South Collector Detailed explanation of the feasibility of these locations for future roundabouts is covered in the Traffic Analysis Memorandum in the appendix. All potential roundabout locations in the study area should be examined in greater detail. 47