Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project
|
|
|
- Melvin Owens
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Project WV Department of Transportation Division of Highways in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration State Project S Federal Project BR-0013(028) E Falls View WVDOH Substation Fayette County Tuesday, January 31, 2012
2 The existing Kanawha Falls (Fayette County Route 13) is on the list of historic bridges and connects US 60 to the communities of Boonesborough and Kanawha Falls in Fayette County, West Virginia. The bridge was originally operated as a toll facility and was purchased by the WVDOH in 1977, renovated in 1979, and then again in The bridge carries 2 lanes of traffic, but presently has a thirty ton weight limit posting that permits one truck to cross at a time. The bridge spans a Norfolk Southern Railroad track from the west, the Kanawha River, a CSX Corporation track, and Fayette County Route 13/2 (CR 13/2) from the east. The average daily traffic (ADT) for the year 2005 is 450 vehicles per day and is projected to increase to 550 vehicles per day in This project study consists of looking at several alternatives for the replacement or rehabilitation of Kanawha Falls. There are two upstream and one downstream from the existing Kanawha Falls location. The other alternatives studied replace the bridge on the existing alignment or rehabilitating the existing structure.
3 Alternative 1 will provide a new bridge approximately 50 upstream from the existing bridge location. This location spans the Norfolk Southern Railroad, Kanawha River, CSX Railroad, and CR 13/2. Access to the Kanawha Falls/Boonesborough area is similar to the existing access at CR 13. The new bridge is approximately 980 in length. A left turn lane on US 60 will be added to provide access for the new bridge. Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge while the new bridge is constructed. Alternative 1A is in the same location as Alternative 1 except the new Kanawha Falls would be a single span truss over the Kanawha River. All other details are the same as Alternative 1. Alternative 2 provides a new Kanawha Falls approximately 2000 upstream from the existing Kanawha Falls. This location spans the Kanawha River while neither spanning nor crossing either of the two railroad systems. This alternative provides at-grade connections at both US 60 and CR 13/2. The new bridge is approximately 1290 in length. A left turn lane on US 60 will be added to provide access for the new bridge. Traffic is maintained on the existing bridge while the new bridge is constructed. Alternative 2A is the same as Alternative 2 with the addition of a US 60 bridge spanning the Norfolk Southern Railroad and additional roadway north and south of the proposed Kanawha Falls. This new bridge spans approximately 750 over the railroad and the additional roadway is approximately 3000 in length. Alternative 2A is no longer being considered due to the extensive costs involved in constructing a second bridge and increased length of roadway. Alternative 2B is the same as Alternative 2 with the addition of a new US 60 bridge spanning the Norfolk Southern Railroad and additional roadway south of the proposed Kanawha Falls. This new US 60 bridge is 131 in length, 40 clear width, and replaces the current existing US 60 at-grade railroad crossing. The US 60 design speed used for alternative 2B is 25 mph, similar to the existing roadway. The WVDOH Maintenance Depot #2 facility will need to be relocated to facilitate the construction of alternative 2B. The WVDOH Maintenance Depot is a potential hazardous waste impact. Lane closures of US 60 are necessary in order to construct the new US 60 bridge. CR 13 traffic would be maintained on the existing Kanawha Falls while the new Kanawha Falls is constructed. Alternative 2C is the same as Alternative 2 with the addition of a bridge spanning the Norfolk Southern Railroad and US 60 with additional roadway north and south of the proposed Kanawha Falls. This new bridge spans approximately 900 over the railroad and the additional roadway length is approximately 2000 in length. Alternative 2C encroaches on an existing park and additional properties. This alternative is no longer being considered due to the extensive costs involved in constructing a second bridge and increased length of roadway.
4 Alternative 3 provides a new Kanawha Falls approximately 3400 downstream from the existing Kanawha Falls. This location provides an at-grade tie-in for US 60 and an at-grade crossing for the Norfolk Southern Railroad. Alternative 3 spans the Kanawha River and CSX Railroad and connect to CR 61/29 at-grade. The new Kanawha Falls is approximately 830 in length. A left turn lane on US 60 will be added to provide access for the new bridge. Lane closures of US 60 are necessary in order to excavate and lower the road surface nearly 2 feet in the area of the turning lane to achieve the at-grade railroad crossing. CR 13 traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge while the new bridge is constructed. Alternative 3A provides a new Kanawha Falls approximately 3400 downstream from the existing bridge at the same location as Alternative 3. This location spans US 60, Norfolk Southern Railroad, Kanawha River and CSX Railroad and connects to CR 61/29 at-grade. This provides an at-grade intersection at US 60. The design speed for the circular bridge approach from US 60 is 25-mph. Lane closures of US 60 are necessary in order to construct tie-in and spanning of US 60. CR 13 traffic will be maintained on the existing Kanawha Falls while the new Kanawha Falls is constructed. Alternative 3B is the same as Alternative 3 with the addition of a new US 60 bridge spanning the Norfolk Southern Railroad. This new bridge is 131 in length, 40 clear width, and replaces the current US 60 at-grade railroad crossing, similar to the bridge proposed in Alternative 2B. Lane closures of US 60 are necessary in order to construct the new US 60 bridge. CR 13 traffic will be maintained on the existing Kanawha Falls while the new Kanawha Falls is constructed. Alternative 3C provides a new Kanawha Falls approximately 3400 downstream from the existing bridge at the same location as Alternative 3. This location spans US 60 Eastbound, Norfolk Southern Railroad, Kanawha River and CSX Railroad and connects to CR 61/29 at-grade. The new Kanawha Falls is approximately 940' in length. Two lane traffic will be maintained on US 60, however short term lane closures of US 60 is necessary in order to construct tie-in and spanning of US 60. CR 13 traffic will be maintained on the existing Kanawha Falls while the new Kanawha Falls is constructed. *Preferred Alternative 4 will rehabilitate the existing Kanawha Falls in the current location. The intersections at each end of the new bridge will be designed for a Single Unit vehicle with 50 foot turning radius. A left turn lane on US 60 will be added to provide access for the rehabilitated bridge. Rehabilitation of the bridge requires closing the structure to traffic. A temporary bridge is not anticipated for Preferred alternate; therefore traffic is rerouted approximately 18 miles for the duration of the scheduled repairs. The detour routes traffic over CR 61/29, WV 61, WV 6, and US 60. The 3.1 miles of CR 61/29 requires some improvements. This detour was used in 1999 when the partial rehabilitation of the existing structure was completed. There are two closure options. Option I is closure only during summer months, for two summers. Option II is a six to eight month closure time April through December during one year.
5 Alternative 4A is the total replacement of the existing Kanawha Falls superstructure, using the existing substructure in the current location. The intersections at each end of the new bridge will be designed for a Single Unit vehicle with 50 foot turning radius. The new Kanawha Falls is approximately 994' in length, utilizing the existing river piers and new abutments. The bridge is comprised of three continuous spans of 266.5', 403' and 324.5'. This option was initially considered to minimize impacts to the Kanawha River caused by construction of new substructure units. However, there are several issues with this option. The existing bridge main span of approximately 403' is reaching the limit for steel plate girders. In addition, the relatively short approach span gives a poor span balance which could result in uplift at Abutment 1. The major concern with this option is a conflict with the railroad clearance envelope for the Norfolk Southern Railroad. With an estimated superstructure depth of 12', the available clearance is approximately 17' over the tracks. Like other options, it was considered to place a simple span over the tracks; however, this reduces the span length from 266.5' to approximately 191.5'. This reduction in span length makes the span ratios worse, resulting in significant uplift at the pier adjacent the tracks. A left turn lane on US 60 will be added to provide access for the rehabilitated Kanawha Falls. Replacement of the bridge requires closing it to traffic. A temporary bridge is not anticipated for alternative 4A; therefore traffic is rerouted approximately 18 miles for the duration of the scheduled works. The detour routes traffic over CR 61/29, WV 61, WV 6, and US 60. The 3.1 miles of CR 61/29 requires some improvements. This detour was used in 1999 when the partial rehabilitation of the existing structure was completed. Alternative 4B is the complete replacement of the existing Kanawha Falls in the current location. The intersections at each end of the new bridge will be designed for a Single Unit vehicle with 50 foot turning radius. The new Kanawha Falls is approximately 980' in length. A left turn lane on US 60 will be added to provide access for the rehabilitated bridge. Replacement of the bridge requires closing it to traffic. A temporary bridge is not anticipated for alternative 4B; therefore traffic will be rerouted approximately 18 miles for the duration of the scheduled repairs. The detour routes traffic over CR 61/29, WV 61, WV 6, and US 60. The 3.1 miles of CR 61/29 requires some improvements. This detour was used in 1999 when the partial rehabilitation of the existing structure was completed. The NO BUILD Option is not feasible with the superstructure and substructure both receiving a poor rating, this No Build option would soon result in the bridge being closed to traffic. With the closing of the bridge, traffic, including emergency services, will be permanently detoured onto CR 61/29, WV 61, WV 6, and US 60. This detour is approximately 18 miles in length. Considering the length and low running speed of the permanent detour, the no build option is not feasible.
6 The purpose of this informational workshop public meeting is to afford participants an opportunity to ask questions and state their views and opinions on the Kanawha Falls Project. Highway personnel will be available to answer any questions. There will be no formal presentation. Those wishing to file written comments may send them to Gregory Bailey, P.E., Director, Engineering Division, West Virginia Division of Highways, Capitol Complex Building Five-Room 317, 1900 Kanawha Boulevard East, Charleston, WV or on or before Wednesday, February 29, 2012.
7 HIGHWAY MAP Kanawha Falls
8 Alternatives Map Kanawha Falls
9 Alternative 1 Alternative 1A Alternative 2 Alternative 2B Alternative 3 Alternative 3A Alternative 3B Alternative 3C Alternative 4* Alternative 4A Alternative 4B No Build Option 50 ft Upstream 50 ft Upstream 2000 ft Upstream 2000 ft Upstream 3400 ft Downstream 3400 ft Downstream 3400 ft Downstream 3400 ft Downstream PREFERRED Rehab Existing Replace Superstructure on Existing Alignement Total Replacement on Existing Alignment No Build CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 CR 13 US 60 Railroad Tracks Spanned Railroad Crossing At Grade Residences Displaced Probability for Pre- Historic Sites NO NO YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Potential Impact to YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES for Scour Protection YES YES YES When is Demolished Potential Hazardous Waste Impacts NO NO NO YES NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO Utilities Impacted CR 13 Length 980 ft 980 ft 1290 ft 1290 ft 830 ft 960 ft 830 ft 940 ft 994 ft 980 ft - US 60 Length ft ft Engineering and Construction Cost $10,100,000 $15,600,000 $12,100,000 $14,700,000 $10,700,000 $12,400,000 $12,900,000 $28,500,000 $14,800,000 $11,100,000 $11,500,000 $750,000 for DEMO Environmental Cost $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 R/W Cost $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $800,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Utility Cost $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,300,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Total Cost $14,200,000 $19,700,000 $18,800,000 $21,700,000 $14,400,000 $16,200,000 $16,700,000 $32,900,000 $17,100,000 $13,900,000 $14,300,000 $3,550,000 Maintenance of Traffic during Construction On Existing On Existing On Existing On Existing On Existing On Existing On Existing On Existing Detour Using Existing Routes Approximately 18 miles Detour Using Existing Routes Approximately 18 miles Detour Using Existing Routes Approximately 18 miles Permanent Closure Detour on Existing Routes Approximately 18 miles Reason for Not Carrying Forward with Alternative ͽ Impacts to ͽ Impacts to Historic ͽ Impacts to ͽ Impacts to Historic ͽ Large Impact to Historic Site ͽ Large Impacts to ͽ At Grade Crossings on Both Sides of the River ͽ Impacts to Historic ͽ Large Impact to Historic Site ͽ Large Impacts to ͽ Impacts to Historic ͽ Large Impacts to ͽ Historic ͽ Requires New at Grade Crossings with Rail Road ͽ Large Impacts to ͽ Impacts Historic ͽ Large Impacts to ͽ Impacts Historic ͽ Requires New at Grade Crossings with Rail Road ͽ Large Impacts to ͽ Impacts Historic PREFERRED ͽ Impacts to Alternative Rehab Existing ͽ ͽ Impacts to Historic Minor Impacts to ͽ Preserves the Historic ͽ Impacts to ͽ Impacts to Historic Considering the length and low running speed of the permanent detour, the no build option would not be feasible *Alternatives 2A and 2C are no longer being considered due to the extensive costs involved in constructing a second bridge and increased length of roadway.
10 Kanawha Falls Rehabilitation Detour Map for Maintenance of Traffic During Construction Approximate Detour Length is 18 miles Kanawha Falls Preferred Alternative Closure Options I. Closure only during summer months, for two summers. II. Six to Eight Month closure time April through December. January 26, 2012
11
Open House Public Meeting for the Thurmond Bridge Rehabilitation Project State Project: State Project S310-25/2-0.10 Federal Project: BR-0252(001)D
Open House Public Meeting for the State Project: State Project S310-25/2-0.10 Federal Project: BR-0252(001)D May 7, 2015 Old Glen Jean Bank Glean Jean, WV 4:00-7:00 PM www.transportation.wv.gov PROJECT
REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a
1-a WINONA BRIDGE (BRIDGE 5900) REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a Rehab option 1-a is a rehabilitation package whereby all spans of the existing structure would be rehabilitated to the degree feasible and strengthened
2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, 2014. DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.
2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, 2014 DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement Mary Ann Triska 2015 HDR, all rights reserved. Presentation Outline Project
Public Information & Public Scoping Meeting
Public Information & Public Scoping Meeting William F. Cribari Memorial Bridge Route 136 over the Saugatuck River Review of Rehabilitation Study Report Public Scoping for the gathering and analysis of
3.1 Historical Considerations
3. Recommended Scope of Bridge improvements 3.1 Historical Considerations In the fall of 2000, an outside consultant, Fraser Design, suggested that the existing 4 th St. Bridge is potentially eligible
3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options
3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options 3.1 Introduction This chapter describes possible options that rehabilitate and enhance the existing Tappan Zee Bridge. Four Rehabilitation Options have been developed:
Red Wing Bridge Project. PAC #5/TAC #8 Meeting July 18, 2013
Red Wing Bridge Project PAC #5/TAC #8 Meeting July 18, 2013 Alternatives Analysis Agenda Overview of Past Progress Progress Since April PAC Bridge 9103 Rehabilitation Study Bridge 9040 Rehab vs. Replacement
5 ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND EVALUATION
Page 23 5 ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND EVALUATION The process used for the assessment and evaluation of the alternatives follows the procedures of the Municipal Class EA, as described below: Identify a reasonable
Alternatives Evaluation Overview
Alternatives Evaluation Overview 124 Alternatives were analyzed against the evaluation criteria Criteria and criteria weighting were set by the Community Task Force Ratings were quantitative and qualitative
Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.
Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E. Project Organization Owner Delaware County Engineers Office Design Consultant CH2M HILL Contractor Double
IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2
IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2 Location: Dallas, Texas Owner: Texas Department of Transportation Client: Ferrovial Agroman Construction Cost: $1 Billion Construction Completion Date: December,
Project R-4467 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT SCHEDULE PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING WHAT WILL BE DONE WITH THE COMMENTS? FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Workshop #3 Aug ust 2012 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to maintain a direct highway connection between Hertford and Winfall along or close to US 17
KOSCIUSZKO BRIDGE PROJECT BRIDGE PRIMER
KOSCIUSZKO BRIDGE PROJECT BRIDGE PRIMER The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate alternatives for the rehabilitation or
Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives
Section 3 ALTERNATIVES 3. Alternatives 3.0 Alternatives The Springfield Rail Improvements Project Build Alternatives would utilize different routes. The No Build Alternative includes the continuation of
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology Abutment A retaining wall supporting the ends of a bridge, and, in general, retaining or supporting the approach embankment. Approach The part of the bridge that carries
Project Information. New Hope - Lambertville Toll Bridge - Pavement Rehabilitation & Approach Bridges Repairs -
Project Information Existing Conditions Cracked and settled pavement. Structural failure within the asphalt pavement section. Anticipated Project Elements Reconstruction of all asphalt pavement on US Route
SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD & NORTHLAKE BLVD. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
UPDATED: 01/31/14 SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD & NORTHLAKE BLVD. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Q. 1. What are the County s plans for Seminole Pratt Whitney Road between SR 80 (Southern Blvd) and the Bee Line
Draft Transportation Management Plan for Via Verdi Repair Project
for Via Verdi Repair Project prepared for City of Richmond This report was prepared by: This report was reviewed by: Ryan McClain, P.E. Fehr & Peers TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROJECT DESCRIPTION...
CITY OF TRAIL MEMORANDUM
0 C CITY OF TRAIL MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 24, 2011 FILE NO. 5400-02 DAVID PEREHJJDOFF, CHIEF ADM1NTSTRATIVE OFFICER WARREN PROULX, ENGINEERING TECHMCIAN OLD TRAIL BRIDGE With the interest
PENNDOT 3D MODELING FOR STRUCTURES WORKSHOP. Presented by: Steven Pletcher and Chris Daniels, P.E. October 21, 2014
PENNDOT 3D MODELING FOR STRUCTURES WORKSHOP Presented by: Steven Pletcher and Chris Daniels, P.E. October 21, 2014 Agenda Introduction G.A. & F.C. Wagman History Process used to prepare 3D models Estimating
Section 6 Traffic Analysis
Section 6 Traffic Analysis Traffic Operations of the Preferred Network Alternative After the Preferred Network was identified and confirmed by local policy makers and area residents, detailed traffic analysis
The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study. Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc.
The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc. March 22, 2010 Replacement vs. Rehabilitation Project Background Introduction
Historic Bridge Alternatives Analysis Layout
Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966 (Title 49, USC, Section 303) requires special considerations be made regarding the use of any publicly owned park, recreation area, wildlife/waterfowl refuge or historic
CONCEPTUAL REHABILITATION ALTERNATIVE
Appendix D While federal law requires preservation/rehabilitation of historic bridges be considered, there is no standard procedure to determine when rehabilitation is appropriate and when replacement
US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study
US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study ITEM NOS. 1-100.00 & 1-1140.00 Prepared by: Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 9750 Ormsby Station Rd Louisville, KY 40223 August 16, 2013 Table of Contents
Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation
Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation Jeff R. Hill, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. 111 W. Port Plaza Drive Suite 600 St. Louis, MO 63146 314-542-3040 [email protected]
Truss Bridges of Kentucky
ACEC Partnering Conference 2012 Truss Bridges of Kentucky 1899 Amanda Abner Rebecca Turner 1893 Truss Bridges of Kentucky Truss Bridges of Kentucky Vincennes Bridge Company Champion Bridge Company Empire
I-676 (Vine Expressway) Bridge Reconstruction Project 22 nd - 18 th Streets Philadelphia, PA. PSPE Presentation, December 3, 2015
I-676 (Vine Expressway) Bridge Reconstruction Project 22 nd - 18 th Streets Philadelphia, PA PSPE Presentation, December 3, 2015 Location Map N PROJECT LOCATION 22 nd 18 th Streets PHILADELPHIA, PA General
SR-18 Corridor Improvements in Wood County
Public Meeting Information Package SR- Corridor Improvements in Wood County Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Meeting Location: Hancock-Wood Electric Cooperative Building 1399 Business Park
2.1 Prior Richmond to South Hampton Roads Rail Service
2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Prior Richmond to South Hampton Roads Rail Service The Norfolk and Western (N&W), now NS, the Seaboard Air Line (SAL) and the Atlantic Coast Line (ACL), both now CSXT, previously operated
How To Check For Scour At A Bridge
Case Studies Bridge Scour Inspection and Repair Edward P. Foltyn, P.E. Senior Hydraulic Engineer ODOT Bridge Unit 2013 PNW Bridge Inspectors Conference April 2013 REFERENCES Stream Stability at Highway
SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.
Page 1 Revised 3/2/10 See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway. For New/Reconstruction projects: The cross slope of the driving lanes range from 1.5% to
FHWA Colorado Division Control of Access to the Interstate and its Right-of-Way February 2005
FHWA Colorado Division Control of Access to the Interstate and its Right-of-Way February 2005 Background: It is in the national interest to maintain the Interstate System to provide the highest level of
Methodology to Identify Preservation Priority Bridges
Methodology to Identify Preservation Priority Bridges Louisiana Historic Bridge Inventory Task 8 Prepared for Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Prepared by www.meadhunt.com November
Analysis of the Interstate 10 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina
Analysis of the Interstate 0 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina By Genda Chen, Emitt C. Witt III, David Hoffman, Ronaldo Luna, and Adam Sevi The Interstate 0 Twin Span Bridge over Lake Pontchartrain
11 p.m. to. Tuesday, June. will remain open. 14. closed
June 3, 2011 CONTACT: Marcia McAllister T: 703 572 0506 C: 571 730 9117 [email protected] Important Lane Closures June 5 11 Include Northbound Beltway Lanes, Eastbound Dulles Airport Access
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
Project Name: Project Sponsor: FEDERAL FUNDS PROJECT APPLICATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2008-2013 SALT LAKE and OGDEN/ LAYTON URBAN AREAS Surface Transportation Program (STP) Urban Surface
Analysis of Accident Statistics
Analysis of Accident Statistics I. BACKGROUND To ensure that safety objectives are met, a distinction must be made between: (1) locations which are hazardous as identified based on accident experiences,
Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC 2015 - October 27, 2015 Session 26
2014 HDR Architecture, 2014 2014 HDR, HDR, Inc., all all rights reserved. Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC 2015 - October 27, 2015 Session 26 Brandon Chavel, PhD, P.E.,
REQUEST TO QUALIFY (RTQ) INFORMATION FOR
I. INTRODUCTION: REQUEST TO QUALIFY (RTQ) INFORMATION FOR GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF THE PIP HELIX RAMP AND REHABILITATION OF UPPER LEVEL SPANS OVER NJ ANCHORAGE AND HUDSON TERRACE CONTRACT
PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING THURSDAY APRIL 30, 2015
PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING THURSDAY APRIL 30, 2015 AT ACTON TOWN HALL FAULKNER ROOM 472 MAIN STREET ACTON, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED ASSABET RIVER RAIL TRAIL (ARRT) IN THE TOWNS OF ACTON
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HENRICO P.O. BOX 27032 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23273 PERMIT NO. One (1) copy of application and four (4) copies of plans are hereby made to the Director of Public Works
Bruce Highway (Cooroy to Curra) Section A (Cooroy southern interchange to Sankeys Road)
Bruce Highway (Cooroy to Curra) Section A (Cooroy southern interchange to Sankeys Road) Industry Briefing - 13 February 2013 Bruce Highway Upgrade (Cooroy to Curra) The Bruce Highway Upgrade (Cooroy to
CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR
CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR Tinker Creek Pedestrian Bridge: Tinker Creek and Glade Creek Greenways Connection Date: September 15, 2014 RSTP Project Profile
FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1
FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1 4. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION The analysis of bridges and structures is a mixture of science and engineering judgment. In most cases, use simple models with
Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects
Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Economic Stimulus Program) Application Packet for: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects APPLICATIONS DUE
Veterans Memorial Bridge (Orange Avenue) PD&E Study
Veterans Memorial Bridge (Orange Avenue) PD&E Study From City Island Parkway to South Peninsula Drive FDOT FPID# 242172-128-01 Volusia County Project# P-5351-1 Project Limits End Project City Island Veterans
EXHIBIT A Accessible Truck Routes Map
EXHIBIT A Accessible Truck Routes Map ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ROUTE: A ROUTE: B ROUTE: C ROUTE: D ROUTE: E EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B Craven Street Improvements Map ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT
INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE.
INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE. M.Sc. Gediminas Viršilas Head of Bridge Division, Lithuanian Road Administration Working group 2 of PIARC Technical Committee
Comment #1: Provide an interchange at Route 7 and Farm Market Road/White Gate Road. This was studied in the late 1990 s.
Proposed Truck Climbing Lane Route 7 Westbound Between West Market Street and Route 9 UPC# 58599, Project # 6007-053-133, P101 Date of Meeting: August 24, 2010 Time: 6:00PM to 8:00PM Location: Rust Library
Chaudière Crossing Bridge Rehabilitation
Chaudière Crossing Bridge Rehabilitation Douglas K. Lowry P. Eng., Armtec Infrastructure Incorporated David Delicate, P.Eng. Public Works and Government Services Canada (Retired) Prepared for presentation
9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. April 24, 2015
9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS April 24, 2015 Kunzman Associates, Inc. 9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS April 24, 2015 Prepared by: Bryan Crawford Carl Ballard,
Effect on structures. Uniform settlement - no concerns. Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain
Effect on structures Uniform settlement - no concerns Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain 1/500 - safe limit for no cracking of buildings 1/150 - potential structural damage 36 37
Mercer County Multi-Modal Transportation Plan Year 2025 Travel Demand Model
Mercer County Multi-Modal Transportation Plan Year 2025 Travel Demand Model Prepared For West Virginia Department of Transportation Transportation Planning Division Building 5, Room 824 1900 Kanawha Blvd.
BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are
Chapter 10 Bridges Chapter 10 Bridges Bridg Bridges -- usually the best, but most expensive drainage crossing structure. Protect bridges against scour. BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are the
Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July 2012. Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam
Design of Bridges Introduction 3 rd to 4 th July 2012 1 FUNCTION OF A BRIDGE To connect two communities which are separated by streams, river, valley, or gorge, etc. 2 EVOLUTION OF BRIDGES 1. Log Bridge
Bridge Office Policies and Procedures BOPP 2014
Bridge Office Policies and Procedures BOPP 2014 Nebraska Department of Roads Bridge Division Last updated: October 2014 Introduction Page I Purpose The BRIDGE OFFICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES manual (BOPP)
REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS AGENDA ITEM #III-3 CORTEZ BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY
NOTES REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS AGENDA ITEM #III-3 CORTEZ BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY Presenter: Summary: Tony Sherrad, FDOT Project Manager The Cortez Bridge in Manatee County,
Project Status Update Open House West End Corridor
Project Status Update Open House West End Corridor The Exposition Construction Authority cordially invites you to a Project Status Update Open House for the Exposition Light Rail Line At this meeting we
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTH BAY SUBSTATION RELOCATION PROJECT TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2014
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTH BAY SUBSTATION RELOCATION PROJECT TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN SEPTEMBER 2014 Traffic Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 OBJECTIVES... 1 3 APPLICABLE
Paving Capitalization Work Categories and Treatments
Statement of ODOT Infrastructure Capitalization Policy Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) 34 requires public agencies to capitalize infrastructure assets on their financial statements for periods
14-97. 14-97.002 Definitions. For the purposes of this rule chapter the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly shows otherwise:
14-97 14-97.001 Purpose. This rule chapter sets forth an access control classification system and access management standards to implement the State Highway System Access Management Act of 1988. The implementation
Source: Port Mann Bridge Plans Unveiled Today, CBC News, February 4, 2009.
Total project cost $2.5 billion (Canadian) Financed by tolls about $3 each direction. Total project length 37 km (McGill St in Vancouver to 216 th in Langley) The new Port Mann bridge 10 lanes (existing
APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION 1.0 Application Procedures 2.0
DISTRICT 3 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN CHECKLIST
State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency DISTRICT 3 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN CHECKLIST District / EA: District 3/ EA 03-3E380 Date Prepared: 1/10/2013 Prepared By: Robert Himes Stage
Table of Contents. Traffic Control Devices (Signs, Channelizing Devices, Lighting Devices, Pavement Markings) 2-7
1 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Traffic Control Devices (Signs, Channelizing Devices, Lighting Devices, Pavement Markings) 2-7 Five Parts of a Traffic Control Zone 8 Buffer Space Guidance 9 Taper Length
Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011
Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011 CCRPC staff has developed a draft methodology described below and detailed in the attached pages for
1What purpose do guard
g u a r d F c a b A l e Q f re q u e n t l y a s k e d q u e s t i o n s 1What purpose do guard cables serve? Cross-Median Fatalities The purpose of high-tension guard cable is to prevent vehicles that,
Transportation Management Plan Template
DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Date Name Position Transportation Service Center Name Position Transportation Service Center Transportation Management Plan Job Number(s) Control Section(s) Route Details County
SUMMARY OF CATEGORIES 2007 STATEWIDE PRESERVATION PROGRAM (SPP) _MAINTAIN IT_
2007 STATEWIDE PRESERVATION (SPP) _MAINTAIN IT_ 1 Preventive Maintenance and Rehabilitation MING AUTHORITY allocation by fmula. Projects selected by districts. State % 0% State Districts RANKING INDEX
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 17, 2013 Contact:
NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 17, 2013 Contact: Diana L. Klink 757.514.4104 757.359.1845 Tim Kelley 757.514.4103 757.871.3039 UPDATE (Bridge Road/Mills Godwin Bridge) The work scheduled
APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 2009 Transportation Improvement Program Call for Projects APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Alternatives Presentation Meeting Middlebury WCRS(23)
Alternatives Presentation Meeting Middlebury WCRS(23) Main Street (VT 30/TH 2 Bridge 102) and Merchants Row (TH 8 Bridge 2) over Vermont Railway June 4, 2013 Twilight Hall Auditorium, Middlebury College
0.0 Curb Radii Guidelines Version 1.0.2
Background In early 2014, Transportation Services initiated a review of the Division's design guidelines and standards to move our organization in a direction consistent with the transportation departments
TH 23 Access Management Study Richmond to Paynesville
TH 23 Access Management Study Richmond to Paynesville Prepared For: Minnesota Department of Transportation District 8 Prepared By: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. July 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction...
How to Design and Build a Fence/G traverse Bridge or Graffiti Project
Outline Project Location Project Description Project History Site Constraints Geotechnical Investigation & Soil Profile Foundation Design Process Photos Project Location Project Limits: The Grand River
How To Improve Road Quality
A Customer Service Level Approach for Maine DOT s Asset Management System Jeffrey L. Zavitski, B.A. Senior Implementation Specialist Deighton Associates Limited Chip Getchell, P.E. Director, Work Plan
Memorandum. PROJECT: Postmark Emergency Storm Repair Alternative Analysis
Memorandum CRW Engineering Group, LLC 3940 Arctic Blvd. Suite 300 Anchorage, AK 99503 (907) 562-3252 FAX 561-2273 TO: Mike Lee, P.E., Chief Engineer, ADOT/ANC FROM: Shane Blanchard, P.E. THRU: Mike Rabe,
GEOMETRIC DESIGN CIVL 3161
GEOMETRIC DESIGN CIVL 3161 Reading Assignment: p. 45-72 (4 th ed.) p.45-75 (previous ed.) in Mannering textbook. Geometric design of highway facilities deals with the proportion of physical elements of
Soapstone Connector Feasibility Study
Technical Report Soapstone Connector Feasibility Study Prepared by ATCS, plc., 2553 Dulles View Drive, Herndon, VA 20171, (703) 430-7500 www.atcsplc.com In association with: Michael Baker Corporation,
I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation
I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation Fall Asphalt Conference Richmond, VA David Shiells, P.E. Virginia Department of Transportation David White Superior Paving Corporation October 2, 2012 Project Location 2 Goal
Earth Retaining Structures
Earth Retaining Structures and Asset Management Earth Retaining Structures and Asset Management A Critical Component Tool in Maintaining Public Safety Earth Retaining Structures (ERS) are often an overlooked
