EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL
|
|
- Maryann Hall
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EXAMPLE DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL A sheet pile wall is required to support a 2 excavation. The soil is uniform as shown in the figure. To take into account the friction between the wall and the soil, we use friction angle δ = φ/2. Please note this value is applied only for passive pressure. Use factor of safety =.5 for passive pressure. Question: What is the embedment and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active pressure above cut: φ = 35, Ka = 2, P = Kaγ(2 ) = (0.27)(25)(2) = Ksf Active pressure below cut: Below the cut, use pressure slope input. The pressure slope Pa = Kaγ = (0.027)(25) = Kcf Passive pressure below cut: Soil friction φ = 35, wall friction δ = φ/2, Kp = 6.74 (NAVFAC or Epres program) The pressure slope Pp = Kpγ/F.S. = (6.74)(25)/.50 = 0.56 Kcf A short result for input and output is presented. NOTE: spacing for the sheet pile The program shows that the minimum embedment is 9.3 and the pile length is 2.3. The maximum moment in the pile is 7 Kip-ft /ft. The maximum moment is at 5.9 from the ground surface. EXAMPLE X γ = 25 pcf φ = 35 o δ = φ/2 (only for passive) H = 2 Dredge Line P = ksf kcf Y 0.56 kcf CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES
2 EXAMPLE 2 Alternative Input for Example The conditions are the same as example. In example 2, we use an alternative input to check the versatility of the program. Instead of inputting both active and passive pressures below the cut, we input the net passive pressure below the cut. The net passive pressure is equal to Pp- Pa. Question: What is the embedment and maximum bending moment in pile? Active pressure above cut: Same as Example. Net pressure below cut: Active pressure slope is Pa = Kaγ = (0.27)(25) = Kcf Passive pressure slope is Pp = Kpγ/F.S. = (6.74)(25) /.5 = 0.56 Kcf Net passive pressure slope is Pn = Pp - Pa = = Kcf The point of zero pressure is e = P/ Pn = 0.405/0.526 = 0.77 Input two active pressures in driving pressure input: One is from x = 0 to x = 2. Another is from x = 2 to x = There is no active pressure input below dredge line. The passive pressure starts Y = 0.77, with a net slope = Kcf The same as example. Alternative: Another alternative input is also presented in attached file, example 2A. In this input, the net passive pressure slope, Kcf is directly inputted from Y = 0 with starting pressure of Ksf. In this way, the calculation of zero pressure point, e, can be omitted. CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 2
3 EXAMPLE 2 X γ = 25 pcf φ = 35 o δ = φ/2 (only for passive) H = 2 e Y = 0.77 P = ksf Y kcf EXAMPLE 3 SURCHARGE, Ps = H = 2 P = P4 =.2 P2 = P5 =.752 P3 = SOIL γ = 25 pcf φ = 30 o δ = φ/2 SOIL 2 γ2 = 30 pcf φ2 = 35 o δ = φ/2 CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 3
4 EXAMPLE 3 DESIGN OF SHEET PILE WALL WITH TWO SOIL AND SURCHARGE LOAD A sheet pile wall is required to support 2 excavation. F.S. =.5 is required for passive pressure. Soil conditions are shown in the figure. The surcharge load will be in a separate diagram. Question: What is the embedment and maximum bending moment in pile? Active pressure above cut: <soil > φ=30, Ka =0.33, P = Kaγ(2 ) = (0.33)(25)(2) = Ksf Active pressure below cut: <soil > pressure slope, Pa = Kaγ = (0.33)(25) = 0.04 Kcf P2 = Kaγ(5 ) = (0.33)(25)(5) = 0.68 Ksf <soil 2> φ2= 35, Ka = 0.27, pressure slope Pa = Kaγ = (0.27)(30) = Kcf P3 = Kaγ (5 ) = (0.27)(30)(5) = Ksf Passive pressure below cut: <soil > φ = 30, δ= φ/2, Kp = 4.8 (NAVFAC or Epres program) pressure slope, Pp = Kpγ/F.S. = (4.8)(25) /.5 = 0.4 Kcf P4 = Pp(3 ) = 0.4(3) =.2 Ksf <soil 2> φ2 = 35, δ= φ2/2, Kp = 6.74 (NAVFAC or Epres program) pressure slope, Pp = Kpγ/F.S.= (6.74)(30) /.5 = (6.74)(30) /.5 = Kcf P5 = Pp(3 ) = 0.584(3 ) =.752 Ksf Use spacing for the sheet pile and 0.24 Ksf for surcharge load. The program shows that the minimum embedment is 3.3 and the pile length is 25. The maximum moment in the pile is 53.3 K-ft/ft at 7.7 from the ground surface. CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 4
5 EXAMPLE 4 DESIGN OF SHEET PILE WALL WITH COHESIVE SOIL AND SURCHARGE LOAD Introduction : In this example, the surcharge load is merged with the active pressure. It also can be separated as example 3. Soil 2 below cut line is a cohesive material with cohesion = 500 pcf (F.S. included). Question: What is the embedment and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active pressure above cut: <soil > φ=30, Ka = 0, P = Ka q = (0.33)(300) = 0. Ksf. P2 = Ka (q + γh) = 0.33 ( x 2) = Ksf Passive pressure below cut: <soil 2> φ2 = 0, Ka = 2, P3 = 4c - σv = 4(500) - (q + γh) = [ (2)] = 0.23 Ksf For passive pressure input, use Top Pres.= 0.23 and Pres. Slope = 0 The program shows that the minimum embedment is 4.58 and the pile length is The maximum moment in the pile is 43.2 Kip-ft/ft at 27.3 from the ground surface. EXAMPLE 4 q = 300psf P = 0. H = 2 P3 = 0.23 P2 = SOIL (LOOSE SAND) γ = 22.5 pcf φ = 30 o δ = 0 Cu = 0 SOIL 2 (MED. CLAY) γ2 = 0 pcf φ2 = 0 Cu = 500 psf CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 5
6 EXAMPLE 5 DESIGN OF SHEET PILE WALL WITH DIFFERENTIAL WATER LEVELS The water level is higher outside of the excavation base. Seepage is allowed to flow through the bottom of the pile. The water pressures of both sides are equal, therefore, the net pressure is zero at the bottom of the pile. Question: What is the embedment and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active pressure above cut: φ = 35, Ka = 5, P = Kaγ(5 ) = (0.27)(25)(5 ) = 0.7 2, P2 = (0.27)( )(2-5 ) + P = Ksf Active pressure below cut: Pa = Kaγ = (0.27)( ) = 0.07 Ksf Passive pressure below cut: φ= 35, Kp = δ = φ /2, P =0 Pp = Kpγ /F.S. = (6.74)(62.6) /.5 = 0.28 Ksf Due to seepage, the net water pressure = 0 at the embedment bottom. Because the embedment depth is unknown, the value can be set 999 to let the program find embedment. (See Chapter 5). The program shows that the minimum embedment is 6.8 and the pile length is The maximum moment in the pile is 38.9 Kip-ft/ft at 20 from the ground surface. EXAMPLE 5 5 H = 2 5 bottom F. S. =.5 P = 0.7 γ = 25 pcf φ = 35 o δ = φ/2 (Only for passive) 2 H = 2 P2 = Pw = The depth is unknown, input 999 in program CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 6
7 EXAMPLE 6 DESIGN OF ANCHORED SHEET PILE WALL WITH THE SAME WATER LEVEL This example has a 36 deep excavation to which tieback anchors are applied. The water levels are the same inside and outside of the excavation. Two layers of soil are presented in the example. Question: What is the embedment, anchor force, and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active pressure above cut: <soil > φ = 34, Ka = 0, P = Kaγ (0 ) = , P2 = P + Kaγ (36-0) = P + (0.28)(60)(26) = Ksf Active pressure below cut: <soil 2> φ2 = 34.5, Ka = 36, P3 = Ka[γ(0) + γ (26)] =.26 [0(0) + 60(26)] = Ksf Passive pressure below cut: φ2= 34.5, Kp = 6.63, Pp = Kpγ Pn = Pp - Pa = ( )(65) = 0.44 Ksf Try input anchor level at 9 from the ground surface. The program shows that the minimum embedment is 7.5 and the pile length is The maximum moment in the pile is 68.7 Kip-ft/ft at 26 from the ground surface. The brace force = 8.8 K/ft. EXAMPLE T P=0.308 H = 36 P2=0.745 SAND BACK FILL γ = 0 γ = 60 pcf φ = 34 o δ = 0 Ka = 0.28 P3= MEDIUM SAND γ = 65 pcf Kp = 6.63 φ = 34.5 o δ/φ = 0.4 Ka = 0.26 Kp - Ka = 6.37 CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 7
8 EXAMPLE 7 DESIGN OF ANCHORED SOLDIER PILE WALL WITH LAGGING A soldier pile wall is used in this example with one tieback anchor applied for each pile. Question: What is the embedment, anchor force, and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active pressure above cut: φ = 30, Ka = 2, P = Kaγ(2 ) = Ksf Passive pressure below cut: C = 700 psf, φ = 0, Ka = 2, P2 = 4c - σv = 4(700) - (22.5)(2 ) =.33 Ksf Try an anchor level = 5 from the pile top. The program shows that the minimum embedment is.3 and the pile length is 3.3. The maximum moment in the pile is 3.2 Kip-ft/ft at 9.3 from the ground surface. Horizontal tieback force is 0.6 Kips per pile. EXAMPLE 7 T 5 Lagging spacing = 6 H = 2 P2 =.33 P = LOOSE SAND γ = 22.5 pcf φ = 30 o δ=0 Cu = 0 Ka = 0.33 MED. CLAY γ2 = 0 pcf φ2 = 0 Cu = 700 psf Pile Dia. = 2 CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 8
9 EXAMPLE 8 DESIGN OF SHEET PILE WALL WITH TIEBACK ANCHOR This example has a limited surcharge load. The surcharge pressure from the Lpres program is 0.42 Ksf as shown in the figure. The water pressure is similar to the condition in example 5. Question: What is the embedment, anchor force, and maximum bending moment in the pile? Surcharge: Ps = 0.42 Ksf Water pressure: Pw = γw (6-8 ) = (62.4)(8) = Ksf Active pressure: P = Kaγ(8 ) = (0.27)(25)(8) = 0.27 Ksf P2 = P +Kaγ= P + (0.27)( )(7) = Ksf Pa = Kpγ = (0.27)( ) = 0.07 Kcf Passive pressure: starting 2 below dredge line P3 = Kp[γ() + γ w ()] = 8.95 [ ] =.26 Ksf Pp = Kpγ = (8.95)( ) = 0.56 Kcf Use 999 for the unknown depth. (See Example 5) The program shows that the minimum embedment is 5 and the pile length is 20. The maximum moment in the pile is 7.3 Kip-ft/ft at 2.5 from the ground surface. T = 8.2 Kips. EXAMPLE 8 q Ps = T P = H = 5 P2 = P3 = γ = 62.6 pcf γ = 25 pcf φ = 35 o δ = φ/2 6 Pw = The depth is unknown, input 999 in program CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 9
10 EXAMPLE 9 DESIGN OF COFFERDAM WITH TWO BRACES Introduction : A cofferdam is designed for a bridge pier excavation. Two braces are used herein. Question: What is the embedment, brace force, and maximum bending moment in the pile? Surcharge: Ps = 0.42 Ksf Water pressure: Pw = γw (6-8 ) = (62.4)(8) = Ksf Active pressure: P = Kaγ(8 ) = (0.27)(25)(8) = 0.27 Ksf P2 = P +Kaγ = P + (0.27)( )(7) = Ksf Pa= Kpγ = (0.27)( ) = 0.07 Kcf Passive pressure: starting 2 below dredge line P3 = Kp[γ() + γ w ()] =8.95 [ ] =.26 Ksf Pp = Kpγ = (8.95)( ) = 0.56 Kcf The condition is the same as in example 8. The maximum movement is significantly reduced due to two levels of bracing. The program shows that the minimum embedment is 4.2 and the pile length is 9.2. The maximum moment in the pile is 7.8 Kip-ft/ft at 4. from the ground surface. T = 5.3 Kips/ ft and T2=2.9 Kips/ ft. EXAMPLE 9 q Ps = T T2 P = γ = 62.6 pcf γ = 25 pcf φ = 35 o δ = φ/2 H = P3 =.26 P2 = Pw = 0 6 Pw = The depth is unknown, input 999 in program CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 0
11 EXAMPLE 0 DESIGN OF COFFERDAM WITH THREE BRACES A cofferdam is designed to support an excavation for a bridge pier. Due to a railroad 6 from the wall, surcharge pressure of 0.42 Ksf is applied. No seepage is allowed below the pile bottom. The water pressures at both sides are not equal. The outside pressure is higher than inside. After subtraction of the inside pressure, the net hydraulic pressure is constant below 36. Question: What is the embedment, brace force, and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active pressure above cut: φ = 35, Ka = 8, P = Kaγ(8 ) = (0.27)(25)(8) = , P2 = Kaγ (35-8) + P = (0.27)(62.6)(27) = Ksf Water 36, Pw = (36-8)(62.4) =.747 Ksf Surcharge load: (from Lpres program) from 0 to 0, Ps = 0.42 Ksf at 36, Ps = 0 Active pressure below cut: active pressure slope: Pa = Kaγ = (0.27)(62.6) = 0.07 Kcf Net water pressure: Pw =.747 Ksf constant Passive pressure below cut: φ = 35, δ = φ/2, Kp = 37, P3 = Kpγ (2 ) = 8.95(62.6)(2) = Ksf passive pressure slope: Pp = Kpγ = 8.95(62.6) = 0.56 Kcf The soil below the excavation base is disturbed. Therefore the passive pressure of the top 2 soil below the dredge line is ignored. The input pressure diagram is shown as follows. The program shows that the minimum embedment is 8.5 and the pile length is The maximum moment in the pile is 32.4 Kip-ft/ft at 25.2 from the ground surface. T = 3.6 Kips/ ft, T2 = 2.6 Kips/ ft, and T3 = 6. Kips/ ft. CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES
12 EXAMPLE 0 Surcharge q H = T T2 T3 37 P3 =.26 P = 0.27 P2 = Ps = γ = 62.6 pcf γ = 25 pcf φ = 35 o δ = φ/2 36 Pw =.747 Cancel out CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 2
13 EXAMPLE DESIGN OF TIEBACK WALL The tieback wall has an 8 spacing of soldier pile supported by timber lagging (3 x 2 ). The active pressure diagram is a trapezoid. The surcharge load of 2 of soil is added to the active diagram. The soldier pile has a 2 diameter shaft. Below the dredge line, the active pressure is acting on one diameter. The passive pressure is acting on two diameters of pile due to the arching effect. Question: What is the embedment, tieback force, and maximum bending moment in the pile? The soil report of this project requires 20(H + 2 ) for active pressure and ignoring the top 2 of passive pressure. The passive resistance is 400 pcf including F.S. Above base 8 spacing Active pressure P2 = P3 = 20(H + 2) = 20(30 + 2) = 0.64 Ksf Below base Active pressure P4 = 30(Z + 2) = 30(30 + 2) = 0.96 Ksf Active pressure slope Pa = 0.03 Kcf Acting diameter of pile. Diameter of pile = 2. Passive pressure slope Pp = 0.4 Kcf Acting 2 diameter of pile. Diameter of pile = 2. Use 3 pressure programs to input the active pressure The program shows that the minimum embedment is 6.7 and the pile length is The maximum moment in the pile is 49.7 Kip-ft at 27. from the ground surface. T = 44.7Kips, T2 = 45.Kips, T3 = 42.9Kips. EXAMPLE Surcharge = 2 (Height of Soil) 5.5 P = 0.04 P2 = H = 6 Lagging Spacing = 8 4 T H = T2 P3 = 0.64 T3 0.2 H = 6 32 P4 = Y 0.03 ( X + 2 ) Acting 2 Dia. of Pile = 4 Acting Dia. Of Pile = 2 CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 3
14 EXAMPLE 2 DESIGN OF ANCHORED AND RACKING BRACED WALL The original design using one level of tieback is not adequate to support the wall. An additional raking brace is added to help the stability of the wall. Question: What is the embedment, brace force, and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active pressure above exc. 20(H) = 20(30 ) = 0.6 Ksf Acting 8 Active below exc. 30(Y) = 30(30 ) = 0.6 Ksf Acting 2 (diameter of pile) Passive below exc. 400Y Acting 4 (2 diameter of pile) Diameter of pile = 2 Lagging spacing = 8 Surcharge as shown Ps = 0.36 The program only calculates the horizontal bracing force. The user has to calculate the vertical force and the total force based on the horizontal force calculations. The program shows that the minimum embedment is 5.8 and the pile length is The maximum moment in the pile is 28.6 Kip-ft at 24 from the ground surface. T = 6.3 Kips, T2 = 7. Kips. The force is in brace = 50 /Sin 45 = 70.7 Kips. EXAMPLE 2 Surcharge 6 T P = H = 6 Ps = Lagging Spacing = 8 7 H = 30 T2 P2 = o P3 = H = CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 4
15 EXAMPLE 3 DESIGN OF BRACED CUT WITHOUT EMBEDMENT Introduction : For trench excavation, sometimes the supporting system only uses steel plates, swale, and braces. The steel plates do not penetrate into the ground. The program also can solve these types of problems. The program also can be applied for trench box excavation for pipelines. This example uses three level of braces for a 20 cut. To check the stability problem, the heave program can be used. Question: What is the bracing force? Active pressure: φ = 30 Ka = 0.33 P = 0.65 KaγH = (0.65)(0.33)(20) 20 = 0.5 Ksf In the program output on page 2, check the bottom which will indicate the shoring wall without bracing. 3.7 T = 2.64k/ ft 0 T2 = 2.87k/ ft 6.3 T3 = 2.64k/ ft Maximum moment in plate: 2 Kip-ft/ft EXAMPLE 3 γ = 20pcf φ = 30 o P= H = 4 H = H = 4 CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 5
16 EXAMPLE 4 DESIGN OF SHEET PILE WALL, POUR SEAL AT BOTTOM Sometimes the bottom of the excavation is sealed to prevent water and heave. In this case, two ways can be used for inputting the concrete seal. ) Use a brace at the level of the seal. Note: the depth of the brace cannot be equal to the depth of the excavation. 0.5 to.0 is required above the excavation level as the input of this example. 2) In the passive pressure input, use a large value of Pres. Top and Pres. Slope. However, if the value is too large, the program cannot function. Trial and error is required. Question: What is the embedment and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active: P = 650 psf Water: P w = γ w (25-0 ) = 62.4 (5) = 936psf Passive: Pp = 300 pcf Concrete seal was poured at bottom of excavation, then dewater to excavation base. Sheet pile spacing (width) = The program shows that the minimum embedment is 3.7 and the pile length is The maximum moment in pile is.7 Kip-ft/ft at 8 from the ground surface. T=5.8 Kips/ ft, T2=5.8 Kips/ ft, and T3=4.2 Kips/ ft. T3 is the concrete seal. If the seal is 2 thick, the compression stress is 75 psi. EXAMPLE 4 P= T T2 0 CONCRETE SEAL, 2 THICK T3 Pw = Cancel out CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 6
17 EXAMPLE 5 DESIGN OF DEEP EXCAVATION USING MULTI-TIEBACK WALL This is a real project in Seattle area. The excavation is 60 below ground. The lagging spacing is 6. 7 levels of tiebacks are used. Vertical spacings of tiebacks need to be adjusted for a minimum moment in piles and smaller reaction force in tieback. The program proves easy input interface, so the user can change the depth of each tieback and run the program several times to get an optimum result. Question: What is the embedment, tieback force and maximum bending moment in the pile? Active: Above Base P = 0.65 KaγH = (0.65)(0.28)(25)(60) =.365 ksf Below Base Passive: Below Base P 2 = KaγH = (0.28)(25)(60) = 2. ksf Pa = Kaγ = (0.28)(25) = kcf Pp = Kpγ = 6.74 (30) = kcf Surcharge 0-0, Ps = 0.64 ksf; >0, Ps 2 = 0.24 ksf The output results are shown in the following: EXAMPLE P= Surcharge γ = 25 pcf φ = 34 o ka = Ps= 0.64 Lagging Spacing = H = P2 = Acting 2 Dia. of pile = 4. Acting Dia. of pile = 2 Ps2 = γ = 30 pcf φ = 35 o δ = φ/2 kp = 6.74 CivilTech Software SHORING EXAMPLES 7
Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers
PDHonline Course C155 (2 PDH) Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers Instructor: Richard P. Weber, P.E. 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA
More informationPDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling. Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE. PDH Online PDH Center
PDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.pdhonline.org
More informationDIRT DWELLING. and your. www.pinfoundations.com. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008
DIRT and your DWELLING 2008 Pin Foundations Inc., 2008 If we accept that preserving soil in its native condition is necessary, then how do we build? Utilities? Roads? Foundations? Typical Strip, Transfer,
More informationFOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples
FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 14-1 Load Path and Transfer to
More information5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction
PIN Foundations Topics Applications Design and Construction Flow Control Credits www.pinfoundations.com Copyright 2008, Pin Foundations, Inc. Curtis Hinman WSU Extension Faculty, Watershed Ecologist chinman@wsu.edu
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SOIL CLASSIFICATION...3 1.1 USCS: Unified Soil Classification System...3 1.1.1
More informationSTRUCTURES. 1.1. Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.
STRUCTURES 1. General. Critical structures may impact the integrity of a flood control project in several manners such as the excavation for construction of the structure, the type of foundation, backfill
More information1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona
for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures SECTION 70 - GENERAL "APPENDIX CHAPTER 7 - EARTHEN MATERIAL STRUCTURES 70. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum standards of safety
More informationvulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works
More informationDesigned and Engineered to Perform
History EARTH CONTACT PRODUCTS, L.L.C., is a family owned company, based in Olathe, Kansas. This company was built upon Don May s U.S. Patented fourth-generation Steel Piering System that has led to the
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:
HANDOUT REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition RETAINING WALLS Fifth Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationGeotechnical Building Works (GBW) Submission Requirements
Building Control (Amendment) Act 2012 and Regulations 2012: Geotechnical Building Works (GBW) Submission Requirements Building Engineering Group Building and Construction Authority May 2015 Content : 1.
More informationEN 1997-1 Eurocode 7. Section 10 Hydraulic Failure Section 11 Overall Stability Section 12 Embankments. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland
EN 1997 1: Sections 10, 11 and 12 Your logo Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 Section 10 Hydraulic Failure Section 11 Overall Stability Section
More informationModule 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS
Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS Topics 17.1 INTRODUCTION Rectangular Combined Footing: Trapezoidal Combined Footings: Cantilever Footing: Mat foundation: 17.2 COMMON TYPES OF MAT FOUNDATIONS
More informationCEEN 162 - Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests
PURPOSE: The parameters of the shear strength relationship provide a means of evaluating the load carrying capacity of soils, stability of slopes, and pile capacity. The direct shear test is one of the
More informationPILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134
C H A P T E R 6 PILE FOUNDATIONS Section I. GROUP BEHAVIOR 6-1. Group action. Piles are most effective when combined in groups or clusters. Combining piles in a group complicates analysis since the characteristics
More informationK x ' Retaining. Walls ENCE 461. Foundation Analysis and Design. Mohr s Circle. and Lateral Earth. Pressures. Lateral Earth Pressure.
Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient K x ' z ' K = lateral earth pressure coefficient x = horizontal effective stress Mohr s Circle and Lateral Earth Pressures x ' = = z ' ENCE 461 Foundation Analysis and
More informationOutline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.
MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E. Micropile Design and Construction Seminar Las Vegas, NV April 3-4, 2008 Outline When are micropiles subject to lateral load? How do we analyze
More informationUnderpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles
Helical Piles Howard A. Perko Copyright 0 2009 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. C h a p t e r 14 Underpinning Systems There has been tremendous growth in the use of helical piles for underpinning
More informationWang, L., Gong, C. "Abutments and Retaining Structures." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000
Wang, L., Gong, C. "Abutments and Retaining Structures." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 000 9 Abutments and Retaining Structures Linan Wang California
More informationATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems
ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems Foundation Repair Systems for Civil Construction Applications: Residential, Commercial, Industrial Atlas Resistance Piers have been used to restore and/or stabilize
More informationModule 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS Topics 24.1 INTRODUCTION 24.2 GRAVITY AND CANTILEVER WALLS 24.3 PROPORTIONING RETAINING WALLS 24.4 APPLICATION OF LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE THEORIES TO DESIGN 24.5
More informationA N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1
A N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1 Worked examples of retaining wall design to BS8002 The following worked examples have been prepared to illustrate the application of BS8002 to retaining
More informationFigure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate
Addendum HELICAL PULLDOWN Micropile (HPM) Introduction The HPM is a system for constructing a grout column around the shaft of a standard Helical Screw Foundation (see Figure A1). To begin the process,
More informationSECTION 02200 SUPPORT OF EXCAVATION
SECTION 02200 PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. Section including specifications for design and installation of excavation support. B. Section also includes specifications for excavation support systems
More informationSystem. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor
Model 150 HELICAL ANCHOR System PN #MBHAT Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor System About Foundation Supportworks is a network of the most experienced and knowledgeable foundation repair
More informationStability. Security. Integrity.
Stability. Security. Integrity. PN #MBHPT Foundation Supportworks provides quality helical pile systems for both new construction and retrofit applications. 288 Helical Pile System About Foundation Supportworks
More informationPro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair
Pro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair Pro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair System Pro-lift steel piles are designed for the stresses of Texas soils. They can have multiple steel walls, depending on the
More informationBRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM
BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM Swaminathan Srinivasan, P.E., M.ASCE H.C. Nutting/Terracon David Tomley, P.E., M.ASCE KZF Design Delivering Success for
More informationSECTION 02401 SHEETING, SHORING AND BRACING
SECTION 02401 SHEETING, SHORING AND BRACING This section should be edited to reflect soil conditions specific to the project site and the recommendations of a Geotechnical Engineer licensed in the State
More informationTremie Concrete CM 420 CM 420 CM 420 CM 420. Temporary Structures. Tremie Concrete
Tremie Concrete Underwater concrete plays an important role in the construction of offshore structures. It may be used to tie together various elements in composite action (i.e., to tie piling to the footing).
More informationFormwork for Concrete
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CM 420 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES Winter Quarter 2007 Professor Kamran M. Nemati Formwork for Concrete Horizontal Formwork Design and Formwork Design
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column
Design of reinforced concrete columns Type of columns Failure of reinforced concrete columns Short column Column fails in concrete crushed and bursting. Outward pressure break horizontal ties and bend
More informationCONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST
CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST 1 Permeability is a measure of the ease in which water can flow through a soil volume. It is one of the most important geotechnical parameters. However,
More informationType of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)
Cause: external force P Force vs. Stress Effect: internal stress f 05 Force vs. Stress Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-05 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Type of Force 1 Axial (tension /
More informationThe unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity.
Page 1 of 8 COST ESTIMATE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS The unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity. Apply the Unit Costs to ordinary structures. Unit Costs should generally
More informationVERTICAL MICROPILE LATERAL LOADING. Andy Baxter, P.G.
EFFICIENT DESIGN OF VERTICAL MICROPILE SYSTEMS TO LATERAL LOADING Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E. PE Andy Baxter, P.G. Outline When are micropiles subject to lateral load? How do we analyze them? Shear Friction
More informationCHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION
391 CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION 9.1 OVERVIEW OF FE SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION Clough and Denby (1969) introduced Finite Element analysis into the soil-structure interaction
More informationDimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes. PD 26 rev D 21/09/05
Dimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes 21/09/05 Page 1 of 15 1. Foreword This document details a method for the structural design of Stanton Bonna Elliptical pipes for the common conditions
More informationComprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility
Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility Problem The project consists of building several dry product storage silos near an existing rail siding in an open field presently
More informationA transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.
Design Step 4 Design Step 4.1 DECK SLAB DESIGN In addition to designing the deck for dead and live loads at the strength limit state, the AASHTO-LRFD specifications require checking the deck for vehicular
More informationMicropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation
Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation Jeff R. Hill, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. 111 W. Port Plaza Drive Suite 600 St. Louis, MO 63146 314-542-3040 JRHill@HaywardBaker.com
More informationReport on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars
Report on Wind Resistance of Signs supported by Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars Prepared for US Sign and Fabrication Corporation January, 2006 SUMMARY This study found the attachment of
More informationHigh Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects
High Capacity Helical Piles Limited Access Projects Tel 403 228-1767 Canada, USA, Russia Brendan ODonoghue 519 830-6113 Presentation Summary 1. Helical piles Background on large diameter shafts and helices
More informationEurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing Dr.-Ing. Bernd Schuppener, Federal Waterways Engineering
More informationABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM
Ninth LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference (LACCEI 11), Engineering for a Smart Planet, Innovation, Information Technology and Computational Tools for Sustainable Development, August 3-, 11,
More informationWisconsin Building Products Evaluation
Safety & Buildings Division 201 West Washington Avenue P.O. Box 2658 Madison, WI 53701-2658 Evaluation # 200813-O Wisconsin Building Products Evaluation Material Best Management Standards for Foundation
More informationALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE
C H A P T E R 5 ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE Section I. BASICS 5-1. Considerations. For safe, economical pile foundations in military construction, it is necessary to determine the allowable load capacity
More informationThe Manitoba Water Services Board SECTION 022180 Standard Construction Specifications PIPE EXCAVATION, BEDDING AND BACKFILL Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of 11 Part 1 General 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF WORK.1 The work described herein shall consist of the excavation of trenches (or excavation of tunnels); the supply and placing of bedding and backfill materials;
More informationAppendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file
Appendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file Notation B1 = lowest level of basement slab c = cohesion E = drained Young s Modulus Eu = undrained Young s Modulus
More informationSHAFT CONSTRUCTION IN TORONTO USING SLURRY WALLS
SHAFT CONSTRUCTION IN TORONTO USING SLURRY WALLS Vince Luongo Petrifond Foundation Co., Ltd. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The York Durham Sanitary System (YDSS) Interceptor in the Town of Richmond Hill located
More informationEmbedded Retaining Wall Design Engineering or Paradox?
Embedded Retaining Wall Design Engineering or Paradox? A personal viewpoint by A.Y. Chmoulian, associate at Royal Haskoning Introduction Retaining wall design theory is a complicated subject with a long
More informationSECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 6 SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. SCOPE OF WORK: The work to be performed under the provisions of these documents and the contract based thereon includes furnishing all labor, equipment, materials,
More informationRetaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations
Retaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations The implementation of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
More informationGLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY
GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY AUTHORIZED PILE LENGTHS - (a.k.a. Authorized Pile Lengths letter) Official letter stating Engineer's recommended length of concrete piles to be cast for construction of foundation.
More informationUp-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations
Up-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations Nathan A. Ingraffea, P.E., S.E. Associate, KPFF Consulting Engineers, Portland, Oregon, USA Abstract The use of steel sheet
More informationsymptoms of a faulty foundation
symptoms of a faulty foundation How does drought impact your home's foundation? For many Texas families, their home becomes the single largest investment and also the family fortune. The home's foundation
More informationWorked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites
Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites Worked example to accompany MBIE Guidance on the seismic design of retaining
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S-000900-0109-3 HOUSTON, TEXAS
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S-000900-0109-3 HOUSTON, TEXAS Reported To: LAN, Inc. Houston, Texas by Aviles Engineering
More informationSECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED
SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design, it is preferable to draw moment diagrams
More informationStatic analysis of restrained sheet-pile walls
Static analysis of restrained sheet-pile walls Bogdan Rymsza Warsaw University of Technology, Civil Engineering Faculty, Poland Krzysztof Sahajda Aarsleff Sp. z o.o., Poland ABSTRACT: The results of displacement
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM SUMMARY REPORT:
Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 3135 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-3135 979-845-6375 Fax: 979-845-6107 http://tti.tamu.edu TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Contract No.: T4541-AO Test
More informationHow To Retaining Wall Guide
How To Retaining Wall Guide Before you start: Consents and Engineering Building Consent Retaining walls over 1.5m high will require a building consent from the Local Body Council. Walls that carry extra
More informationTable of Contents. July 2015 12-1
Table of Contents 12.1 General... 3 12.2 Abutment Types... 5 12.2.1 Full-Retaining... 5 12.2.2 Semi-Retaining... 6 12.2.3 Sill... 7 12.2.4 Spill-Through or Open... 7 12.2.5 Pile-Encased... 8 12.2.6 Special
More informationMETHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST
Compression Test, METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST Tension Test and Lateral Test According to the American Standards ASTM D1143 07, ASTM D3689 07, ASTM D3966 07 and Euro Codes EC7 Table of Contents
More informationResidential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair
Juneau Permit Center, 4 th Floor Marine View Center, (907)586-0770 This handout is designed to help you build your deck to comply with the 2006 International Residential Building code as modified by the
More informationLong-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations
Design Step 7.1 INTEGRAL ABUTMENT DESIGN General considerations and common practices Integral abutments are used to eliminate expansion joints at the end of a bridge. They often result in Jointless Bridges
More informationFOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE
County: Any Design: BRG Date: 10/007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 10/007 FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE Design: Based on AASHTO LRFD 007 Specifications, TxDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual, and TxDOT Project 0-4371
More informationGUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST
GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST NZ GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY INC August 2001 CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Background 2 3.0 Recommended Practice 3 4.0 Undrained Shear Strength 3 5.0 Particular
More informationSample Project with SlurryTBM according to Anagnostou and Kovári
1 General Sample Project with SlurryTBM according to Anagnostou and Kovári The aim of the document is to provide information about the required input parameters and the necessary steps for the calculation
More informationState of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS
State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS While its use is not required, this checklist has been prepared to provide the field inspector a summary
More informationHow to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code
ABSTRACT How to Design Helical Piles per the 2009 International Building Code by Darin Willis, P.E. 1 Helical piles and anchors have been used in construction applications for more than 150 years. The
More informationGeotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture No. # 13 (Refer Slide Time: 00:18) So last class, it was
More informationLighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.
Registered Engineering Firm (F: 9334) Phone: 214-577-1077 Fax: 214-224-0549 Website: www.lighthouseeng.com Email: Office@LighthouseEng.com Thursday, September 04, 2014 TO: Our Client RE: Initial Engineering
More informationDynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles
Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles ANNUAL KANSAS CITY SPECIALTY SEMINAR 2014 JANUARY 10, 2014 Jorge Beim JWB Consulting LLC Pile Dynamics, Inc. Main Topics Brief description of the Dynamic Load Test
More informationDESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY
DESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY A GUIDE FOR A RCHITECTS AND E NGINEERS Table of Contents 1. Introduction Page 1 2. Common Foundation Systems Page 2 3. Drilled Piers Page 3 a. Skin Friction Piers
More informationJune 2007 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.0 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.1 GENERAL
7.0 7.1 GENERAL For the purpose of this manual, culverts are defined as structures that are completely surrounded by soil and located below the surface of the roadway parallel to the general direction
More informationTransmission Foundations. helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures. www.hubbellpowersystems.com
Transmission Foundations helical piles and guy anchors for transmission structures www.hubbellpowersystems.com Grid locked on your transmission job? Instant Foundation helical piles go places concrete
More informationOverhang Bracket Loading. Deck Issues: Design Perspective
Deck Issues: Design Perspective Overhang Bracket Loading Deck overhangs and screed rails are generally supported on cantilever brackets during the deck pour These brackets produce an overturning couple
More informationRAM JACK INTRODUCTION
RAM JACK INTRODUCTION PROVEN BUSINESS MODEL Billions of dollars in damages are caused by inferior soils each year. How much of this business are you profiting from? Our business systems have proven to
More informationChallenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC 2015 - October 27, 2015 Session 26
2014 HDR Architecture, 2014 2014 HDR, HDR, Inc., all all rights reserved. Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC 2015 - October 27, 2015 Session 26 Brandon Chavel, PhD, P.E.,
More informationSECTION 25. Excavation and Trenching
SECTION 25 Excavation and Trenching 25.A General. The requirements of this Section are applicable to all Government and contractor work forces when their employees are performing excavation or trenching
More informationSPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)
Page 1 of 7 STONE STRONG SYSTEMS SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised ) PART 1: GENERAL 1.01 Description A. Work includes furnishing and installing precast modular blocks
More informationStatics of Structural Supports
Statics of Structural Supports TYPES OF FORCES External Forces actions of other bodies on the structure under consideration. Internal Forces forces and couples exerted on a member or portion of the structure
More informationHow to Design and Build a Fence/G traverse Bridge or Graffiti Project
Outline Project Location Project Description Project History Site Constraints Geotechnical Investigation & Soil Profile Foundation Design Process Photos Project Location Project Limits: The Grand River
More informationH 300 DESIGN LOADS AND DISTRIBUTION OF LOADS
6-86 H 300 TABLE OF CONTENTS H 300 DESIGN LOADS AND DISTRIBUTION OF LOADS SECTION NO. SUBJECT DATE H 310 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Feb. 1984 H 320 DEAD LOAD " H 330 LIVE LOAD " H 331 HIGHWAY LIVE LOAD " H 332
More informationTECHNICAL NOTE Lining of Casings with SaniTite HP Pipe
TECHNICAL NOTE Lining of Casings with SaniTite HP Pipe TN 5.18 October 2015 In sanitary sewer, it is often necessary to use trenchless technology methods to install a casing pipe under high volume roads,
More informationLaterally Loaded Piles
Laterally Loaded Piles 1 Soil Response Modelled by p-y Curves In order to properly analyze a laterally loaded pile foundation in soil/rock, a nonlinear relationship needs to be applied that provides soil
More informationENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design
This image cannot currently be displayed. ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations Total and Differential Settlement Schmertmann s Method This image cannot currently be displayed. Strength
More informationStep 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations
Step 6 Buckling/Slenderness Considerations Introduction Buckling of slender foundation elements is a common concern among designers and structural engineers. The literature shows that several researchers
More informationSpecification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems
Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems The following specifications provide Allan Block Corporation's typical requirements and recommendations. At the engineer of record's
More informationTHE OBJECTIVES OF ROUTINE ROAD CUTS AND FILLS
Chapter 11 Slope Stabiliza bilization and Stability of Cuts and Fills THE OBJECTIVES OF ROUTINE ROAD CUTS AND FILLS are 1) to create space for the road template and driving surface; 2) to balance material
More informationSoil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters
Soil Mechanics Shear Strength of Soils Chih-Ping Lin National Chiao Tung Univ. cplin@mail.nctu.edu.tw 1 Outline Shear Failure Soil Strength Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion Laboratory Shear Strength Test
More informationTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL SCOPE This section of the specifications includes requirements for the Slurry Trench Cutoff Wall and related work as indicated on the
More informationTYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR
TYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR If you listen to the hype, it sounds like there must be 20 or 30 different types of piers out there. Company A says they have an
More informationStrengthening of Large Storage Tank Foundation Walls in an Aggressive Environment by External Post-tensioning. May 7th 2013: Dominique Deschamps
Strengthening of Large Storage Tank Foundation Walls in an Aggressive Environment by External Post-tensioning May 7th 2013: Dominique Deschamps Scope of the paper Presentation of the project Cause of cracks
More informationHow To Model A Shallow Foundation
Finite Element Analysis of Elastic Settlement of Spreadfootings Founded in Soil Jae H. Chung, Ph.D. Bid Bridge Software Institute t University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Content 1. Background 2.
More informationEXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD
EXPERIMENT 10 PERMEABILITY (HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY) TEST CONSTANT HEAD METHOD 106 Purpose: The purpose of this test is to determine the permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of a sandy soil by the constant
More informationThere is no water, surface tension cracks, nor other environmental conditions present that reduce the stability of the excavation.
Part 1926 Subpart P Introduction The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued its first Excavation and Trenching Standard in 1971 to protect workers from excavation hazards. Since then,
More informationCHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE
CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE 9.1 INTRODUCTION An important reason that composite piles have not gained wide acceptance in the civil engineering practice is the lack of a long
More information