Light Rail Transit in Phoenix



Similar documents
Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High

Introduction to Station Area Planning The Charlotte Story

30 Years of Smart Growth

Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study. June 19, 2013

Los Angeles Metro Rapid


Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

When is BRT the Best Option? 1:30 2:40 p.m.

Addendum to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

5.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

Tier 1 Strategies. WV Route 14 Corridor Management Plan

North Avenue Corridor Study. Advisory Committee Meeting #5 June 11, 2014

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

Appendix J Santa Monica Travel Demand Forecasting Model Trip Generation Rates

Mayors Welcome Strong Surrey Votes Yes Coalition Support. Yes Vote Would Vastly Improve Transit and Transportation in Fast Growing City

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

Strategic Economic Development Assets: Infrastructure in the East Valley

Chapter 9: Transportation

Measuring the Street:

Surface Transportation Program (STP)

Strategic Regional Transit Plan

MEMORANDUM. Robert Nichols, Acting Corridor Design Manager Northgate Link Extension

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

Review Public Input Report Jenn Toothaker. Approval of Meeting Summaries: May 21, May 23, May 30, & June 20, 2013 Meetings

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

Protected Bicycle Lanes in NYC

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs

Route Development Plan

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

HOW WILL PROGRESS BE MONITORED? POLICY AREA. 1. Implement the 2040 Growth Concept and local adopted land use and transportation plans

College of Southern Maryland. Hughesville Transportation Study

Transitways and the RouteAhead for Calgary Transit

Mount Royal College Transit Service Plan

Transportation Alternatives

Subject: Presentation - TTC/Transportation Services Joint Surface Transit Initiatives

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Task 1 Project Management and Project Organization Work Plan

LRT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

TCRP Report 153: Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations. Part 2: Station Typology and Mode of Access Planning Tool

APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks

For more information, visit: rethinkingstreets.com

Arizona State University & City of Phoenix Partnership: Creating a Downtown Campus

Phoenix. Description: US 60 WS 300ft N/O Thomas Rd F/S - 1. TAB Panel ID: City: PHOENIX Latitude:

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

Northwest Light Rail Extension Pre-Construction/Final Design. Public Meeting November 27 & 29, 2012

Designing Pedestrian Facilities for Accessibility. ADA Compliance Training. Local Programs Engineer FHWA NJ Division

From: HDR Engineering & Oz Engineering Project: AZTech TM Transit Data Integration Concepts of Operation. Date: July 29, 2009 Job No:

1. Land Use. Chapter 1: Land Use 1-1 Adopted 10/2/09 Amended 3/22/11, 8/16/11

BRT BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Improving Access in Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus Executive Summary

Evanston Main Street Station TOD Plan and Study. Appendix A.1: Station Area Existing Conditions

Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before and After Study. N 34th Street to N 50th Street

Eagle Commuter Rail Denver, Colorado Final Design (Based upon information received by FTA in November 2010)

Questions and Answers about the Orange Bus/Rail Investment Plan

Transit Technology Alternatives

Topic 2 11/28/2012 Blocks & Street Network

d r a f t Division Street: 15.4 du/a Damen Avenue: 14.1 du/a Western Avenue: 12.8 du/a

CITY OF EL PASO: SUN METRO Legislative Update Briefing

Pavement Management Program

SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD & NORTHLAKE BLVD. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

The Fresno COG Travel Demand Forecasting Model How the Pieces Fit Together

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Transportation Improvement Program FY

Corridor Goals and Objectives

Transcription:

4. Presentation and Discussion: Phoenix Light Rail Implementation Wulf Grote Planning and Development Director, Phoenix Valley Metro Light Rail Transit in Phoenix Broadway Citizen s Task Force February 25, 2013 1

Valley Metro Who Are We? Operate Regional Transit Services Valley Metro and Phoenix are region s primary service providers Light Rail and Bus Project Development Rail and bus corridors Support facilities Total Transit Network Every transit mode serves a certain purpose and market. Many modes working in concert create a successful transportation network. We have to continue to build. Economic prosperity Mobility choices Quality of life 4 2

Valley-Wide Transit Growth 25 years Population - Doubled 3.8 million in 2010 Miles of Operation - Tripled 31 million annual revenue miles Transit Boardings - Quadrupled 72 million annual passengers Travellers have responded to the investment in transit! 1985 Regional Sales Tax Proposed Freeways 20 year tax Also created RPTA and minor transit funding 3

Light Rail Funding Sources Tempe Sales Tax - 1996 (Prop 400) Phoenix Sales Tax - 2000 (Prop 2000) Mesa General Fund Glendale Sales Tax 2001 (Prop 402) Regional Sales Tax 2004 (Prop 400) 20 year tax; 2/3 highways & 1/3 transit Federal Transit Administration New Starts CMAQ and STP 7 Phoenix Metro Area Rail Projects 8 4

20-Mile Light Rail Line 9 Why this route? Corridor has highest travel demand High demonstrated bus ridership Highest employment concentrations Good residential base High student population Corridor contains most special event facilities 10 5

20-mile LRT Project History Initiated Project Planning -1996 Selected Preferred Alternative - May 1998 Started Preliminary Engineering - Sept 1998 Completed Environmental Work - Jan 2003 Started Final Design - July 2003 Started Construction - Oct 2003 Full Funding Grant Agreement - Jan 2005 Open for Operations Dec 2008 11 Defining Success : LRT Ridership Exceeding all expectations Exceeded opening year forecast by 34% Forecast - 26,000/day; Actual - 35,000/day Nearing 2020 ridership projection Forecast - 48,000/day; Current - 44,000/day All-time high = 65,773 on Dec 7, 2013 Demographics: Students Workers Special event-goers 12 6

Defining Success: Development $6.9 billion total investment Planned, under construction or completed Within walking distance of LRT $5.4B private investment $1.5B public investment 13 Developments: Residential Tapestry on Central Phoenix Grigio Metro Tempe Campus Suites Tempe 14 7

Developments: Large Mixed Use CityScape Phoenix Hayden Ferry Lakeside Tempe 15 Developments: Public Investment Phoenix Convention Center Civic Space Park ASU Downtown Campus 16 8

Connecting Sky Harbor Airport Initial connection was by bus 1200 daily riders PHX Sky Train Phase I opened on April 8, 2013 17 LRT Characteristics 19 of 20 miles are in street 149 signalized intersections 18 9

Central Avenue Before 6 lanes 25% of people were on buses during peak periods 19 Central Ave - After Goal was to maintain previous curb line 20 10

Central Ave - After 21 Central Ave - After 22 11

LRT in Street Median Left turn access is restricted Traffic signals located every 1/4 mile to allow left turns and u-turns for property access Camelback Rd Before 5 lanes Phoenix requested the addition of 1 EB lane 24 12

Camelback Rd - After 25 19 th Ave Before 5 lanes Phoenix desired to retain all existing lanes because 19th Ave is an I-17 traffic reliever 26 13

19 th Ave - After 27 Washington St Before 6 lanes Street capacity was no longer needed because of the I-10 freeway completion 28 14

Washington St - After 29 Apache Boulevard Before 6 lanes Tempe residents wanted traffic calming 30 15

Apache Boulevard - After 31 Apache Boulevard - After 32 16

Light Rail Construction Projects 33 Northwest LRT Extension 19 th Ave Phoenix desired to retain all existing lanes 34 17

Northwest LRT Extension Cross Section 35 Central Mesa LRT Extension - Before West Mesa - Retain 4 lanes Downtown Mesa - No property acquisition 36 18

Sycamore to Country Club 37 Country Club to Mesa Drive 38 19

Downtown Mesa Photo-Simulation 39 Gilbert Road LRT Extension 40 20

Gilbert Road LRT Extension Street Configuration Options Existing Four lanes with parking Options Evaluated Four lane option Two lane option 41 Gilbert Road LRT Extension Recommended Cross Section 2 through lanes Widen to 4 traffic lanes at arterial Intersections Retains bicycle lanes and some on-street parking Minimizes property acquisition 42 21

Preparing for Future Light Rail Right-of-way preservation Early utility relocations Land use Transit Oriented Development Pedestrian and bicycles ADA considerations Phasing from bus to rail 43 Right-of-Way Preservation LRT width requirements: Two Track Alignment 27 to 34 At Stations (two track) 41 to 60 Left turn lanes for in-street LRT add 10 to 12 Varies according to site conditions 44 22

Early Utility Relocations Reasons to relocate: Allows utility maintenance Minimum clearance for structural loads Can be 15 to 20% of project cost Can be a significant source of project delay Consider relocating as part of street projects 45 Transit Compatible Land Use Steps to success: General Plan Policies Overlay Zoning Districts Building Code Modifications Station Area Planning Development Community Education and Recruitment Market Analysis 46 23

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Create compatible land uses at stations to improve ridership Make access to transit stations easy and attractive for pedestrians Provide an environment that is human-scaled (rather than auto oriented) 47 Access to future light rail Items to include with street projects: Improve sidewalks & pedestrian environment Bring sidewalks and curb ramps in compliance with ADA requirements Add bike lanes Develop bike routes/paths to access future LRT stations 48 24

Phasing From Bus to Rail Successful bus ridership makes the case for federal funds Bus operations can be a challenge during LRT construction about 3 years Dedicated bus lanes located in future LRT space makes transition to rail difficult Bus lanes close down during LRT construction 49 Broadway Boulevard Considerations Phoenix vs. Tucson Regional Freeways Regional sales tax Land use Vision Highway oriented? Transit oriented? 50 25

People Lined Up to Experience LRT 51 Wulf Grote, PE Director, Planning and Development 602-322-4420 wgrote@valleymetro.org 52 26