Multiple/Post Hoc Group Comparisons in ANOVA



Similar documents
ITS-90 FORMULATIONS FOR VAPOR PRESSURE, FROSTPOINT TEMPERATURE, DEWPOINT TEMPERATURE, AND ENHANCEMENT FACTORS IN THE RANGE 100 TO +100 C.

1. Measuring association using correlation and regression

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH (PYC 304-C) Lecture 12

INTERPRETING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)

SIMPLE LINEAR CORRELATION

1) Assume that the sample is an SRS. The problem state that the subjects were randomly selected.

Section 13, Part 1 ANOVA. Analysis Of Variance

CHOLESTEROL REFERENCE METHOD LABORATORY NETWORK. Sample Stability Protocol

Development and use of prediction models in Building Acoustics as in EN Introduction. 2 EN 12354, part 1 & Lightweight single elements

Causal, Explanatory Forecasting. Analysis. Regression Analysis. Simple Linear Regression. Which is Independent? Forecasting

Review of Multiple Regression Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, Last revised January 13, 2015

Chapter 5 Analysis of variance SPSS Analysis of variance

Basic statistics formulas

THE ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF SURVIVABILITY OF MPLS NETWORKS. Mohammadreza Mossavari, Yurii Zaychenko

Implementation of Deutsch's Algorithm Using Mathcad

PERRON FROBENIUS THEOREM

8.5 UNITARY AND HERMITIAN MATRICES. The conjugate transpose of a complex matrix A, denoted by A*, is given by

benefit is 2, paid if the policyholder dies within the year, and probability of death within the year is ).

The Greedy Method. Introduction. 0/1 Knapsack Problem

One-Way ANOVA using SPSS SPSS ANOVA procedures found in the Compare Means analyses. Specifically, we demonstrate

The issue of whether the Internet will permanently destroy the news media is currently a

THE METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES THE METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES

NPAR TESTS. One-Sample Chi-Square Test. Cell Specification. Observed Frequencies 1O i 6. Expected Frequencies 1EXP i 6

Calculation of Sampling Weights

ANOVA ANOVA. Two-Way ANOVA. One-Way ANOVA. When to use ANOVA ANOVA. Analysis of Variance. Chapter 16. A procedure for comparing more than two groups

What is Candidate Sampling

1 Example 1: Axis-aligned rectangles

A technical guide to 2014 key stage 2 to key stage 4 value added measures

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PARALLEL ALGORITHMS

An Alternative Way to Measure Private Equity Performance

Jet Engine. Figure 1 Jet engine

Examining Differences (Comparing Groups) using SPSS Inferential statistics (Part I) Dwayne Devonish

ESSAYS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY AND EMISSIONS TRADING

One-Way Analysis of Variance

STATISTICAL DATA ANALYSIS IN EXCEL

Types of Injuries. (20 minutes) LEARNING OBJECTIVES MATERIALS NEEDED

Calibration and Linear Regression Analysis: A Self-Guided Tutorial

ARTICLE IN PRESS. JID:COMAID AID:1153 /FLA [m3g; v 1.79; Prn:21/02/2009; 14:10] P.1 (1-13) Computer Aided Geometric Design ( )

Main Effects and Interactions

ANOVA Notes Page 1. Analysis of Variance for a One-Way Classification of Data

Rotation Kinematics, Moment of Inertia, and Torque

T-test for dependent Samples. Difference Scores. The t Test for Dependent Samples. The t Test for Dependent Samples. s D

Recurrence. 1 Definitions and main statements

Quantization Effects in Digital Filters

DEFINING %COMPLETE IN MICROSOFT PROJECT

Independent Samples T- test

How To Calculate The Accountng Perod Of Nequalty

Simple Interest Loans (Section 5.1) :

Portfolio Loss Distribution

Question 2: What is the variance and standard deviation of a dataset?

TI-83, TI-83 Plus or TI-84 for Non-Business Statistics

A Basic Guide to Analyzing Individual Scores Data with SPSS

HÜCKEL MOLECULAR ORBITAL THEORY

14.74 Lecture 5: Health (2)

Forecasting the Direction and Strength of Stock Market Movement

Luby s Alg. for Maximal Independent Sets using Pairwise Independence

STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATORS. x, where. = y - ˆ " 1

Ring structure of splines on triangulations

Efficient Project Portfolio as a tool for Enterprise Risk Management

Two Related Samples t Test

Latent Class Regression. Statistics for Psychosocial Research II: Structural Models December 4 and 6, 2006

Module 2 LOSSLESS IMAGE COMPRESSION SYSTEMS. Version 2 ECE IIT, Kharagpur

CHAPTER 14 MORE ABOUT REGRESSION

An Empirical Study of Search Engine Advertising Effectiveness

" Y. Notation and Equations for Regression Lecture 11/4. Notation:

v a 1 b 1 i, a 2 b 2 i,..., a n b n i.

Economic Interpretation of Regression. Theory and Applications

IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTION OF A COMMON ERROR IN GENERAL ANNUITY CALCULATIONS

Chapter 7: Answers to Questions and Problems

How To Understand The Results Of The German Meris Cloud And Water Vapour Product

Atkinson-Stiglitz and Ramsey reconciled: Pareto e cient taxation and pricing under a break-even constraint

s-domain Circuit Analysis

1.5 Oneway Analysis of Variance

SPSS Guide: Regression Analysis

Staff Paper. Farm Savings Accounts: Examining Income Variability, Eligibility, and Benefits. Brent Gloy, Eddy LaDue, and Charles Cuykendall

7.5. Present Value of an Annuity. Investigate

13: Additional ANOVA Topics. Post hoc Comparisons

SPEE Recommended Evaluation Practice #6 Definition of Decline Curve Parameters Background:

Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Limitations of the t-test

Fixed income risk attribution

A DYNAMIC CRASHING METHOD FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT USING SIMULATION-BASED OPTIMIZATION. Michael E. Kuhl Radhamés A. Tolentino-Peña

How To Model A Multi-Home

Netherlands Published online: 27 Jun 2013.

Addendum to: Importing Skill-Biased Technology

How To Understand Propect Theory And Mean Variance Analysis

PRACTICE 1: MUTUAL FUNDS EVALUATION USING MATLAB.

Multifunction Phased Array Radar Resource Management: Real-Time Scheduling Algorithm

Unit 11 Using Linear Regression to Describe Relationships

The Mathematical Derivation of Least Squares

Statistiek II. John Nerbonne. October 1, Dept of Information Science

VRT012 User s guide V0.1. Address: Žirmūnų g. 27, Vilnius LT-09105, Phone: (370-5) , Fax: (370-5) , info@teltonika.

For example, you might want to capture security group membership changes. A quick web search may lead you to the 632 event.

Conversion of Non-Linear Strength Envelopes into Generalized Hoek-Brown Envelopes

The OC Curve of Attribute Acceptance Plans

Measuring adverse selection in managed health care

Chapter 14, Problem 1. Find the transfer function V o. /V i. of the RC circuit in Fig Express it using ω = 1/RC. Figure For Prob

Transcription:

Multple/Pot Hoc Group Comparon n ANOVA Note: We may ut go over th quckly n cla. The key thng to undertand that, when tryng to dentfy where dfference are between group, there are dfferent way of adutng the probablty etmate to reflect the fact that multple comparon are beng made. Introducton. In a one-way ANOVA, the F tattc tet whether the treatment effect are all equal,.e. that there are no dfference among the mean of the J group. A gnfcant F value ndcate that there are dfference n the mean, but t doe not tell you where thoe dfference are, e.g. group 1 mean mght be dfferent than group mean but not dfferent from group 3 mean. To olate where the dfference are, you could do a ere of parwe T-tet. The problem wth th that the gnfcance level can be mleadng. For example, f you have 7 group, there wll be 1 parwe comparon of mean; f ung the.05 level of gnfcance, you would expect at leat one tattcally gnfcant dfference even f no dfference ext. Therefore, varou method have been developed for dong multple comparon of group mean. In SPSS, one way to accomplh th va the ue of the /POSTHOC parameter on the Oneway command. We ll preent the SPSS output and then explan what the dfferent part mean. ONEWAY core BY program /STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES /MISSING ANALYSIS /POSTHOC = BONFERRONI SIDAK SCHEFFE ALPHA(.05. Oneway Decrptve SCORE Total 95% Confdence Interval for Mean N Mean Std. Devaton Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Mnmum Maxmum 5 11.8000 1.9354.8603 9.4116 14.1884 9.00 1 5 8.8000 1.64317.73485 6.7597 10.8403 6.00 10.00 5 1.000 1.30384.58310 10.5811 13.8189 1 1 5 8.6000 1.51658.6783 6.7169 10.4831 7.00 1 0 10.3500.544.50406 9.950 11.4050 6.00 1 ANOVA SCORE Between Group Wthn Group Total Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sg. 54.950 3 18.317 7.045.003 41.600 16.600 96.550 19 Multple/Pot Hoc Group Comparon n Anova - Page 1

Pot Hoc Tet Multple Comparon Dependent Varable: SCORE Bonferron Sdak Scheffe (I PROGRAM (J PROGRAM *. The mean dfference gnfcant at the.05 level. Mean Dfference 95% Confdence Interval (I-J Std. Error Sg. Lower Bound Upper Bound 00* 1.01980.009574.8381 5.1619 -.4000 1.01980.70006 -.5619 1.7619 3.000* 1.01980.006355 1.0381 5.3619-00* 1.01980.009574-5.1619 -.8381-3.4000* 1.01980.00407-5.5619-1.381.000 1.01980.846988-1.9619.3619.4000 1.01980.70006-1.7619.5619 3.4000* 1.01980.00407 1.381 5.5619 3.6000* 1.01980.00781 1.4381 5.7619-3.000* 1.01980.006355-5.3619-1.0381 -.000 1.01980.846988 -.3619 1.9619-3.6000* 1.01980.00781-5.7619-1.4381 00 1.01980.05744 -.0679 6.0679 -.4000 1.01980 0000-3.4679.6679 3.000* 1.01980.038130.131 6.679-00 1.01980.05744-6.0679.0679-3.4000* 1.01980.054-6.4679 -.331.000 1.01980 0000 -.8679 3.679.4000 1.01980 0000 -.6679 3.4679 3.4000* 1.01980.054.331 6.4679 3.6000* 1.01980.016686.531 6.6679-3.000* 1.01980.038130-6.679 -.131 -.000 1.01980 0000-3.679.8679-3.6000* 1.01980.016686-6.6679 -.531 00 1.01980.056084 -.0575 6.0575 -.4000 1.01980.9997-3.4575.6575 3.000* 1.01980.037530.145 6.575-00 1.01980.056084-6.0575.0575-3.4000* 1.01980.04978-6.4575 -.345.000 1.01980.999987 -.8575 3.575.4000 1.01980.9997 -.6575 3.4575 3.4000* 1.01980.04978.345 6.4575 3.6000* 1.01980.016571.545 6.6575-3.000* 1.01980.037530-6.575 -.145 -.000 1.01980.999987-3.575.8575-3.6000* 1.01980.016571-6.6575 -.545 00 1.01980.068155 -.1789 6.1789 -.4000 1.01980.984100-3.5789.7789 3.000* 1.01980.048181.011 6.3789-00 1.01980.068155-6.1789.1789-3.4000* 1.01980.033774-6.5789 -.11.000 1.01980.997930 -.9789 3.3789.4000 1.01980.984100 -.7789 3.5789 3.4000* 1.01980.033774.11 6.5789 3.6000* 1.01980.03519.411 6.7789-3.000* 1.01980.048181-6.3789 -.011 -.000 1.01980.997930-3.3789.9789-3.6000* 1.01980.03519-6.7789 -.411 Multple/Pot Hoc Group Comparon n Anova - Page

We have een the decrptve tattc and the ANOVA table before, o we wll focu on the Pothoc comparon table. Mean dfference. Th column gve the dfference n the mean of the group. For example, group 1 mean 11.8, group mean 8.8, o the dfference 3. An aterk by the value ndcate whether the dfference tattcally gnfcant gven the method of multple comparon beng ued. (More on method below. Standard error. In a One-way Anova, the tandard error of the dfference between the two mean of group and = 1 1 MSE * + N N (Recall that MSE another name for MS Wthn. In th partcular example, the group ze are all the ame, whch why the reported tandard error are all the ame, but th wll not be true when group ze dffer. In th example, 1 1 1 1 ˆ ˆ * µ = MSE + =.6* + = 1.04 = 1.0198 µ N N 5 5 Sg. Th column gve you the gnfcance of the dfference under the multple comparon method beng ued. To undertand th, we need explan each of the 4 method beng ued and what ther ratonale.. tand for Leat Sgnfcant Dfference t tet. Th tet doe not control the overall probablty of reectng the hypothee that ome par of mean are dfferent, whle n fact they are equal,.e. t doen t matter f you are comparng 1 par of mean or a 100, no adutment made for the number of comparon. The formula ˆ µ ˆ µ = Th tattc ha a T dtrbuton wth N-J d.f. where J = number of group. So, for example, the value for the comparon of group 1 and ˆ µ ˆ µ = = 3 1.0198 =.94175, d.f = 16 Multple/Pot Hoc Group Comparon n Anova - Page 3

The -taled probablty of gettng a t value th large or larger n magntude f the null true only.009574,.e. there le than 1 chance n a hundred that ther could be no dfference n group mean and the ample would produce a dfference n mean that th large. Alternatvely, you can ut quare the tattc; the reultng value ha an F dtrbuton wth d.f. 1, N-J,.e. ˆ ˆ µ µ = ˆ µ ˆ µ = 3 1.0198 = 8.654, d.f = 1,16 The name derve from the fact that you determne what the mallet dfference between mean that would be tattcally gnfcant. If the actual dfference greater than that, then you regard the reult a tattcally gnfcant. In th cae, note that f we are dong a twotaled tet ung the.01 level of gnfcance, the crtcal value for a t wth 16 d.f..91. (For an F wth d.f. 1, 16, the crtcal value 8.53 For the.05 level (whch what we told ONEWAY to ue the crtcal value.1, hence there an * by the value of 3 n the mean dfference column. Note that make no adutment for the fact that multple comparon are beng made. In th cae, there are 6 poble parwe comparon; hence the odd that at leat one of them would be gnfcant at the.05 level (even f there are no dfference actually much greater than.05,.e. f you do enough comparon, ut by chance ome wll how up a gnfcant. The remanng method offer dfferent way of adutng the gnfcance level to compenate for th. Bonferron. The Bonferron adutment the mplet. It bacally multple each of the gnfcance level from the tet by the number of tet performed,.e. J*(J-1/. If th value greater than 1, then a gnfcance level of 1 ued. So, for example, the tet report that the dfference between group 1 and gnfcant at the.009574 level. The Bonferron adutment multple th by 6 (the number of parwe comparon when there are 4 group and report a gnfcance level of 6 *.009574 =.05744. Note that th greater than.05, o the dfference between group 1 and not condered gnfcant (hence no * n the mean dfference column. For group 1 veru 3, report that the dfference only gnfcant at the.7 level. Snce 6 *.7 greater than 1, the Bonferron adutment report a gnfcance level of 1. If you compare the gnfcance level of and Bonferron, you ll ee that Bonferron alway 6 tme larger than, or ele 1,.e. Bonferron = Mnmum(6*, 1. An addtonal mplcaton of th that reult have to be gnfcant at the.05/6 =.00833 level n order to be gnfcant at the.05 level under Bonferron. Smlarly, f we had 7 group and hence 1 parwe comparon, the tet would have to be gnfcant at the.05/1 =.0038 level to be gnfcant after the Bonferron adutment. Multple/Pot Hoc Group Comparon n Anova - Page 4

Sdak. Whle mple, the Bonferron adutment actually overcompenate for the fact that multple comparon are beng made, e.g. f you do 1 tet, the probablty NOT 1.05 that at leat one of them wll be gnfcant at the.05 level; rather, t 1.95 1 =.659. The Sdak adutment compute the level of gnfcance a gnfcance So, for example, for the group 1 veru group comparon, the Sdak gnfcance gnfcance =.009574 6 =.056087 Th a lttle more gnfcant than what Bonferron came up wth but tll more than.05, o the dfference between group 1 and not condered gnfcant. For group 1 veru 3, gnfcance =.70006 6 =.9997 Scheffe. The Scheffe tet take a omewhat dfferent approach. The Scheffe tet compute an F tattc wth d.f. = J-1, N-J. Scheffe = /(J 1. So, for group 1 veru group, the Scheffe value 8.654/3 =.8847. An F value of.8847 wth d.f. = 3, 16 gnfcant at the.068 level. (For an F wth d.f. 3, 16, the tet tattc ha to be 3.01 or larger to be gnfcant at the.05 level. Agan, Scheffe ay the group 1 veru group dfference not gnfcant at the.05 level. Confdence Interval. I won t go nto the detal of how the confdence nterval are computed. But, note that, f 0 fall wthn the confdence nterval, you hould NOT reect the null hypothe that there no dfference n the mean. Other Comment. I m not ure that t make a whole lot of dfference whch of the adutment method you ue. But, nce all 3 of thee wll how up n the lterature, you hould undertand the general dea that thee are method degned to reduce our overall chance of falely reectng each hypothe to α rather than lettng t ncreae wth each addtonal tet. The flp de that the adutment method ncreae the lkelhood we wll tck wth the null when we hould reect t. For example, uppoe there were 7 group and each parwe dfference wa gnfcant at the.04 level. It extremely unlkely that you would get o many gnfcant dfference by chance and your overall F value n your ANOVA would be hghly gnfcant. Nonethele, f you made the Bonferron adutment, each would now be gnfcant at the.84 level and hence none of the dfference would be condered gnfcant. Smlar adutment can be done n other context, e.g. n a correlaton matrx, ome correlaton can be gnfcant ut by chance; o, you ll ometme ee Bonferron or other adutment beng made. I ve never been aked to make any uch adutment n my work! Indeed, t get complcated to do o once you get beyond a one-way Anova framework. But, uch adutment are probably much more common n other feld of tudy. Multple/Pot Hoc Group Comparon n Anova - Page 5