A Summary Report on DEBRIS IMPACT RESISTANCE OF BUILDING ASSEMBLIES Submitted to NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (N.I.S.T) In Compliance with The NIST/ Cooperative Agreement Windstorm Mitigation Initiative A Compilation of ing Performed by The Wind Science and Engineering Research Center Texas Tech University & Florida A & M University, Florida State University & University of Florida Submitted August 2006 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT... iii ABSTRACT... iv INTRODUCTION...1 General...1 Objectives...3 TEST PROGRAM...4 Performance Classifications and Expectations...4 ing Method...5 APPENDIX A... A-1 ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The following report is a compilation of test reports written by the Wind Science and Engineering Research Center at Texas Tech University and by the Departments of Civil, Environmental and Coastal Engineering at Florida A&M, Florida State University and the University of Florida. The complete Florida report can be viewed on the internet at the following address: http://floridadisaster.org/bpr/response/engineers/library.htm. Other debris impact data can be found in the Enhanced Protection from Severe Wind Storms Report produced by Clemson University (2000). This data is not included in the report due to differences Pass/Fail Criteria. The Texas Tech study was funded in part by the State of Texas, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and Texas Tech University. The Florida study was performed under a grant from the Division of Emergency Management, Community Affairs. iii
ABSTRACT Since the early 1970 s, Texas Tech University has been deeply involved in wind engineering research conducted through the Institute for Disaster Research and the Wind Science and Engineering Research Center. Research has shown that in violent wind storms, hurricanes and tornadoes, windborne debris causes considerable damage to buildings and poses a threat to life, even to building occupants. Based upon field research, guidelines and standards have been developed for the protection of building envelopes and building occupants from windborne debris. Those guidelines and standards are included, in part, in FEMA Publications, the Florida, the Standard and the International. The following report is a compilation of studies conducted by Texas Tech University, Florida A&M University, Florida State University and the University of Florida. The purpose of these studies was to investigate the performance of wall and roof assemblies when subjected to the impact of windborne debris. Due to the differences in speed between the types and classes of wind events, specific criteria were developed to simulate the results of such an impact event. type, weights and speeds were developed that were unique to the storm type and classification. Wall and roof assemblies were constructed and tested for their performance when subjected the impacts. The results of both studies was the development of building assemblies, utilizing commonly materials, that could resist the windborne debris propelled by a storm of specific type and speed. iv
INTRODUCTION General Tornadoes, tropical storms and hurricanes are natural disaster-causing phenomenon. There is a high probability of severe windstorms and tornadoes occurring any where in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains and tropical storms and hurricanes occurring along the Gulf and Atlantic Coast. Such severe storm events threaten approximately ¾ of the nation s building stock and population. Experience with tornadoes and hurricanes in the U.S. and around the world have established the importance of windborne debris to the performance of buildings in windstorms. Compromising of the building envelope by windborne debris during a hurricane leads to major economic loss through damage to building content, possible failure of structural systems, and present a hazard to building occupants. Hence, it is important that the building design process address these important hurricane effects, which affect building performance. The ferocity and devastation of killer tornadoes was illustrated in the Lubbock tornado of 1970 when 26 lives were lost; in the 1974 Super Outbreak in the upper Midwest when 300 people perished; and in the storm that struck Oklahoma and Kansas in 1999 in which 44 deaths were recorded. Extensive research work has been performed at the Texas Tech University () Wind Science and Engineering Research Center (WISE) and other places on the effect of windborne debris impact on the building envelope and it s components (McDonald 1985, 1988, 1990, 1999, Cook et al 1998, 1999, 2000). Based on this research, several national and regional building codes have adopted the missile impact testing procedure (with modifications as deemed necessary) for establishing minimum debris resistance acceptance criteria of the external envelope for buildings (ASCE-7 2002, SBC 2000, FBC 2001). In 1998 FEMA published FEMA 320, Taking Shelter from the Storm, a prescriptive document that provided information for homeowners to assess their risk utilizing a severe wind map developed at Texas Tech and provided builder s plans for the construction of various types of shelters. The research and guidelines was further developed for larger shelters, and FEMA 361, Design and Construction Guidance for Community Shelters was released in 2000. The missile impact test procedure is designed to represent tornado wind speeds up to 250 mph. The large missile test involves shooting 2 by 4 in. lumber weighing 15 lb at 100 mph horizontally. In concurrence with FEMA 361 and the included wind map impact protocols were further developed for the 200 mph, 160 mph and the 130 mph wind zones. The importance of windborne debris protection to building performance in hurricanes became quite evident to experts involved in the building industry following the devastating effects of Hurricane Andrew in 1992. This hurricane created an enormous amount of windborne debris, which caused substantial damage to building envelopes. The 1
impact of Hurricane Andrew, the costliest hurricane in the U.S. (prior to Katrina 2005) prompted engineers and building officials to address issues concerning building design to account for enhanced turbulent wind pressures and debris carried by these winds. New requirements for design have been developed to ensure the integrity of the building envelope during a hurricane. One such requirement is the missile impact test, where the impact of windborne debris in a hurricane is simulated by launching a wooden 2x4 at glazed openings, exterior walls and the roof of a building. To comply with the test, the building s exterior must withstand the perpendicular impact of a wooden 2x4 striking at a designated velocity. The recently adopted Florida (FBC) specifies that all parts of systems of a building envelope must meet the impact test criteria or be protected with a device satisfying the test criteria. According to the FBC and the International Building Code (IBC 2003), the Large Impact is valid for assemblies and materials used up to 30 ft. in height. ASCE 7-02 specifies a maximum applicable height of 60 ft. for this test. In this test, entire assembled units are subjected to a 2 by 4 in. lumber weighing 9 lb impacting at a speed of 34 mph (equivalent to 50 ft/sec), representing hurricane conditions in Florida. The Division of Emergency Management (DEM) at the Community Affairs (DCA) is in the process of developing a comprehensive standard (NHC 2002) for NHC Category 5 hurricane resistant Emergency Operations Centers (EOC). Among various features, the survivable EOCs must be Designed and built to survive the range of anticipated hazards and to function effectively In the absence of such a standard, the Enhanced Hurricane Protection Areas (EHPA) guidelines from the FBC are being used for EOCs. The EOC buildings also must satisfy wind load provisions from the ASCE 7-98 specifications, and most importantly, windborne debris impact criteria from the Standard (SBC 2000), ASTM standard E-1996 (2004), ASTM standard E-1886 (2004), or TAS 201 (2001). The expected DCA EOC standard will be very useful in providing a comprehensive single source guideline. The EHPA guidelines state that wind and debris exposure can be supplied through the FBC criteria provided an enhanced wind speed of 40 mph above the code specified basic design wind speed is used. A draft EOC Survivability Performance Category table from DCA lists Performance Category 3 (from 0 4 scale) as Hurricane Enhanced Protection, with missile impact resistance of a 2 by 4 in. 15 lb stud traveling at 50 mph. Some other building standards for hazard design have incorporated more stringent missile impact criteria. For example, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard 1020 Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for DOE Facilities lists Performance Categories 1 4 (DOE 2002). For Categories 3-4 for essential facilities in this standard provides missile impact criteria as a 2 by 4 in. 15 lb plank traveling at 50 mph. The International Code Council (ICC 2006) Storm Shelter Standard Committee has proposed a draft (ICC/NSSA Standard for the Design & Construction of Storm Shelters) for large windborne debris impact criteria for hurricanes with design wind speeds between 160 and 220 mph (3-sec gust) that is based on an extreme wind map with a 10,000 year return period. The hurricane shelter projectile is a 2 by 4 in. 9 lb plank traveling at 0.40 times the design wind speed. 2
The University of Florida (UF) performed a number of large missile impact tests on various wall and roof assemblies (Braden 2004, Cook et al 1998, 1999, 2000, Ellifritt and Johnson 1998, Staley 1999, Anderson 1995), based on the FBC large missile impact standards. Since 1970, has performed numerous missile impact tests on wall and roof assemblies that was primarily focused on tornadic missile criteria. Some testing using the enhanced missile impact criteria was conducted by and UF. Additional testing was conducted to cover all the wind zones for tornadoes and hurricanes by and is included in this compiled report. Objectives 1. To prepare a comprehensive list of wall and roof assemblies that has been tested with the large missile. 2. To report additional testing conducted on assemblies constructed for wind zones not previously tested. 3
TEST PROGRAM Performance Classifications and Expectations Failure of a test assembly is defined in this section based on previous research and test standards, as previously described. Failure of a barrier or target may be defined in various ways, depending upon the intended application or use of the target. According to FBC (2001), penetration of the missile is the failure criteria. A wall or roof assembly passes the test, if it rejects the missile without penetration. Anderson (1995) performed large missile impact tests on metal-clad structures. It was observed that even if the missile did not penetrate or perforate the test panels, large openings in the seam between panels were developed in a few tests. These openings were of sufficient size to allow the wind to pass through. According to the FBC (2001), these test assemblies passed the large missile impact test although there was a possibility of wind passing through the assemblies. This does not meet the intent of the code, which is to prevent damaging wind from entering the building during a hurricane. FBC (2001) further states that any specimen that passes the large missile impact test needs to be tested for small missile impact test if the specimen has an opening that a 3/16 in. sphere can pass through. SSTD 12 (1999) and ASTM C-1996 (2004) provide an acceptance criterion, which may be used to overcome this deficiency in FBC (2001) standard. SSTD 12 (1999) and ASTM C-1996 (2004) state that porous test specimens must resist the large missile impact without penetration to pass the test. For non-porous specimens, these standards allow an opening with diameter less than 3 in. The Florida study primarily followed the FBC (2001) large missile impact test acceptance criteria, which states that a specimen passes the test if it rejects the missile without any penetration. As this criterion is not clear, a few more conditions were added. The objective of the study was to provide a safe place for the occupants during a hurricane. Based on this objective, test acceptance criteria for the basic, enhanced-a and enhanced-b large missile impact tests were the same. The test criteria are provided in Table 1. The FEMA recommended 3 in. or more permanent deformation of the metal assembly was not utilized in Florida research, mainly due to two reasons. Firstly, FEMA recommendations were applicable to areas, which are susceptible to tornadoes, whereas, this research was applicable to hurricane-prone regions in Florida. Secondly, any deformation in the wall or roof assembly does not lead to the total failure of the structure, as it may happen in case of an opening in the assembly. FEMA-361 (2002) developed a large missile impact test standard for tornado shelters or components based on the research performed at (2002). In this standard, failure is defined as the behavior that might cause injury to occupants of a building. Perforation by the missile, scabbing of target material that would create debris, or large deformations of the target would constitute failure. But the definition of failure of a test assembly is not clear in the above statement. It does not mention the amount of scabbing material or deformation that may be considered as failure of the specimen. According to FEMA-361 (2002), permanent deformation of 3 in. or more after impact is deemed unacceptable. 4
Research related to the design of nuclear power facilities produced relatively large body of information and design guides for predicting the response of reinforced concrete walls and roofs to the impact of windborne debris. The failure modes were identified as penetration, threshold spalling, spalling, barrier perforation, and complete missile perforation (Twisdale and Dunn 1981). From a sheltering standpoint, penetration of the missile into, but not through, the wall surface is of no consequence unless it creates spalling, where concrete is ejected from the inside surface of the wall or roof. As the size of the spalling increases, so does the velocity with which it is ejected from the wall or roof surface. When spalling occurs, physical injury and death to people directly behind the impact point are possible. In barrier penetration, a hole occurs in the wall, but the missile still bounces off the wall or becomes stuck in the hole. A plug of concrete about the size of the missile is knocked into the room and may injure or kill occupants. Complete missile perforation may cause injury or death to people hit by the primary missile or wall fragments. So, failure criteria for reinforced concrete barriers should be the spalling of concrete. ing Method Significance of the : The basic large hurricane missile impact test may not be sufficient for EOCs, schools and light commercial buildings. To provide Hurricane Enhanced Protection to the EOCs or according to DCA, schools and other commercial buildings, enhanced large missile impact test needs to be performed. The enhanced impact is termed as enhanced-a in this study. In the present study, both the basic and enhanced-a tests were performed. The basic test was performed according to the TAS 201-94, Impact Procedures, described in FBC (2001). The missile test criteria for the basic and enhanced-a tests were FBC specified 2x4 in. 9 lb missile at 34 mph and DOE specified missile at 50 mph, respectively. For the enhanced-b test, a missile was impacted at a speed of 60 mph. The missile test criteria for basic, enhanced-a and enhanced-b tests are given in Table 1. The missile impact test procedure provides a means of determining whether a particular wall, roof, exterior window, exterior door and any other similar device used as external protection to maintain the envelope of the building, provides sufficient resistance to windborne debris. The tornado and hurricane shelter impact standards were developed for life safety. The missile test criteria for these standards are shown in Table 1. 5
Table 1: Large Impact Criteria s Size (lb) Basic Hurricane 2x4 in. wood stud 9 34 Hurricane Enhanced-A 2x4 in. wood stud 15 50 Hurricane Enhanced-B 2x4 in. wood stud 15 60 Tornado 2x4 in. wood stud 15 100 Hurricane Shelter 2x4 in. wood stud 9 0.40 x wind zone speed Large Cannon: The large missile cannon at both and UF used compressed air to propel a large missile at the test specimen at standard testing speeds in accordance with FBC (2001) TAS 201-94 Impact Procedures and DOE Standard 1020 (1994) and the FEMA 320/361 guidelines. The major components of the missile cannon include the following: 1. Compressed air supply 2. Pressure release mechanism 3. Pressure gage 4. Barrel and frame 5. Timing system 6. Data Acquisition System : Each missile was constructed using surface dry Southern Pine 2x4 in. boards. The missiles were sized such that the weight was between 9 and 9 1/2 lb with a length between 7 and 9 ft. or with a weight between 15 and 15 1/2 lb. and a length between 11 and 13 ft. in accordance with FEMA-361 (2002). s were chosen such that no knots appeared within 12 in. of the leading edge. The trailing edge of each missile was affixed with a plastic sabot to facilitate launching. This connection was accomplished by using a 3 in. long, 5/8 in. diameter screw. The sabot s weight did not exceed 1/2 lb. Specimens: Specimen sizes ranged from 4 ft. x 4 ft. panels to 9 ft. x 10 ft. panels. The size differences was a function of standard material dimensions, stud spacing and reinforcing spacing that was being studied. All specimens were mounted and clamped to a rigid load frame capable of resisting the impacts without rebound. 6
APPENDIX A PREVIOUS LARGE MISSILE IMPACT TESTS PERFORMED ON WALL AND ROOF ASSEMBLIES s Performed on Wall/Roof Assemblies Large missile impact tests performed at (1973-2006), UF (Cook et al 1998, 1999, 2000, Ellifritt and Johnson 1998, Staley 1999, Anderson 1995), Miami-Dade (2003) and Education (2003) are listed in this appendix. They are summarized as follows: Basic large missile impact test on wall/roof assemblies (a) Wall/roof assemblies passing previous basic large missile impact tests (Table A.1) (b) Wall/roof assemblies failing previous basic large missile impact tests (Table A.2) Enhanced large missile impact test on wall/roof assemblies (c) Wall/roof assemblies passing previous enhanced large missile impact tests (Table A.3) (d) Wall/roof assemblies failing previous enhanced large missile impact tests (Table A.4) Non-standard large missile impact test on wall/roof assemblies (e) Wall/roof assemblies passing previous large missile impact tests for various missile sizes and speeds (Table A.5) (f) Wall/roof assemblies failing previous large missile impact tests for various missile sizes and speeds (Table A.6). The following information is provided for each wall and roof section: type of wall/roof systems, source of the test, and description of the wall/roof construction, test missile size and speed, and description of damage. Large missile impact test on wall/roof assemblies for hurricane shelters. (a) Wall/roof assemblies passing previous basic large missile impact tests (Table A.7) A-1
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 1 CMU (Wall) UF 6 in. ASTM C-90 single-wythe CMU wall, Width: 6 ft. Reinforcement: #5 bar @ 5 ft. 4 in. o.c., 2x4 in. joists @ 24 in. o.c. 2 CMU (Wall) UF 8 in. ASTM C-90 single-wythe CMU wall, Width: 6 ft. 8 in. Reinforcement: #5 bar @ 6 ft. o.c., 2x4 joists @ 24 in. o.c. > 34 > 34 > 34 > 34 > 34 Impact point at the center of the wall. No penetration or perforation. Punch-out of the front face. Slight horizontal cracking on the back face. Mortar joint cracking along the bottom and side of the block. Impact point near the right support. Punch-out of the front face and vertical cracking between the point of impact and the edge of the support. back face was unable to withstand the impact. Impact point near the left support (mortar joint). No penetration or perforation. Punch-out of the front face with the removed portion remaining intact. Back face experienced vertical cracking along the web and along the joints on both sides of the block. Impact point at the center of the wall. No penetration or perforation. Complete punch-out of the front face. Slight joint cracking on the back face. Impact point near the right support. No penetration or perforation. Punch-out of the front face with the removed portion remaining intact. The back face experienced vertical cracking along the web and horizontal cracking along the joints above and below the block. A-2
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. 2 (contd.) Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description CMU (Wall) UF 3 Metal (Roof) UF 8 in. ASTM C-90 single-wythe CMU wall, Width: 6 ft. 8 in. Reinforcement: #5 bar @ 6 ft.o.c., 2x4 in. joists @ 24 in. o.c. > 34 Galvanized 24 ga. roof panel clip allows for roof expansion and 35.4 contraction. The panel seams are locked into place with a snapon batten strip with a factory 34.5 applied sealant. Panel size: 3 panels, 24 in. x 20 ft. Girts: Z 8.25, 0.071 in. thick 34.3 4 Metal (Roof) UF 22 ga. painted metal panel with standing seam, mechanical seam, Panel size: 4 panels, 1 ft. 6 in. x 9 ft., Girts: Z 8.25, 0.071 in. thick, @ 3 ft. o.c. (vertically spaced) 35.1 Impact point near the left support (mortar joint). No penetration or perforation. Punch-out of the front face with the removed portion remaining intact. Back face experienced extensive vertical cracking along the web and horizontal cracking along the joints above and below the block. Impact point at the center. No penetration or perforation. Seam opening: none Impact point near the seam. No penetration or perforation. Seam opening: right (1/4 in. max x 5 in. ) Impact point near the seam. No penetration or perforation. Seam opening: left (1/8 in. max x 1/8 in. ) Impact point at the center. No penetration or perforation. Seam opening: none Impact point near the seam. No 35.1 penetration or perforation. Seam opening: none 34.3 Impact point near the seam. No penetration or perforation. Seam opening: none A-3
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 5 Metal (Roof) UF 6 Hollow Core Slab (Roof) UF 22 ga. standard 1.5 in. wide-rib steel (galvanized, 33 ksi) deck, Ribs spaced at 6 in. o.c., Girts: Z 8.25 @ 5 ft. Company A: 6 in. hollow core grouted slab 35.4 Impact point at the center of the panel. No penetration or perforation. 35.1 Impact point at 6 in. from the support. No penetration or perforation. 36.2 Impact point at the center of the panel. No penetration or perforation. 36.2 Impact point at 6 in. from the support. No penetration or perforation. 34.6 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. 33.3 Impact point at the bottom of the support. Cracked corner off. 33.6 Impact point at the mid-height of the support. Crack entire length front/back. 33.1 Impact point at the top of the support. Crack from impact to edge. 34.7 Impact point at the top-center of the slab. Knocked chunk off slab. 33.4 Impact point at the bottom-center of the slab. No damage. 42 Impact point at the grouted edge of the support. No damage. 34.1 Impact point at the grouted edge of the support. No damage. A-4
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. 34.5 Impact at the center of slab. No damage. 33.5 Impact point at the bottom of the support. No damage. 31.9 Impact point at the bottom-center of the slab. No damage. 33.3 Impact point near the support. Cracked 1/4 of span through core. 34.5 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. 34.8 Impact point at the bottom of the support. Slight crack visible near edge. 34.7 Impact point at the bottom-center of the slab. No damage. 34.6 Impact point near the support. Cracked 1/4 of span out edge. 34.5 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. UF Company B: 6 in. hollow core slab 34.1 Impact point at the bottom of the support. No damage. 33.6 Impact point at the bottom-center of the slab. No damage. UF Company B: 8 in. hollow core slab 34.5 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. 34.6 Impact point at the top of the support. No damage. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 7 Hollow Core Slab UF Company A: 8 in. hollow core (Roof) grouted slab 8 Hollow Core Slab UF Company A: 10 in. hollow core (Roof) grouted slab 9 10 11 Hollow Core Slab (Roof) Hollow Core Slab (Roof) Hollow Core Slab (Roof) UF Company B: 10 in. hollow core slab 36.4 35.4 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. Impact point at the top of the support. No damage. A-5
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. 12 13 Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description Hollow Core Slab (Roof) Hollow Core Slab (Roof) UF UF Company C: 6 in. hollow core slab Company C: 8 in. hollow core slab 14 Hollow Core Slab UF Company C: 10 in. (Roof) hollow core slab 15 Hollow Core Slab (Roof) UF Company C: 12 in. hollow core slab 34.6 Impact at the center of slab. No damage. 34.5 Impact point at the top of the support. No damage. 33.6 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. 34.1 Impact point at the top of the support. No damage. 34.5 Impact point at the top of the support. No damage. 34.5 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. 35.4 Impact point at the center of the slab. No damage. 36.4 Impact point at the top of the support. No damage. Impact point at the center. No penetration 34 or perforation. Seam opening: none Galvanized 24 ga. rolled-form panel with structural ribs on 12 in. 34.8 Impact point on the seam. No penetration or perforation. Seam opening: none 16 Metal (Wall/Roof) UF in. apart were used on the overlap seams. Panel size: 3 panels, 36 in. x 20 ft. Girts: Z 8.25, 0.071 in. thick centers. Sidelap screws spaced 12 in. on center. Impact point near the seam. No 34.1 penetration or perforation. Seam opening: none 35.1 Impact point near the seam. No penetration or perforation. Seam opening: 1/4 in. max x 2-1/2 in. max A-6
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description A-7 37 No penetration or perforation. 1 in. tear. 35 No penetration or perforation. 1.5 in. tear. 34.8 No penetration or perforation. 9.5 in. tear. 17 Metal UF 24 ga. sheet metal (50 ksi) 34.2 No penetration or perforation. (Wall/Roof) Girts: Z 8.25, 5 ft. spacing 35 No penetration or perforation. 18 34 No penetration or perforation. 7.5 in. tear. 36 No penetration or perforation. 35.4 No penetration or perforation. 34.8 No penetration or perforation. No penetration or perforation. 33.8 No penetration or perforation. Metal UF 26 ga. sheet metal (50 ksi) 33.6 No penetration or perforation. (Wall/Roof) Girts: Z 8.25, 5 ft. spacing 34.5 No penetration or perforation. 19 Metal (Wall/Roof) UF 26 ga. sheet metal (80 ksi) Girts: Z 8.25, 5 ft. spacing 33.6 No penetration or perforation. No penetration or perforation. 35 No penetration or perforation. 8 in. tear. 35.4 No penetration or perforation. 35.1 No penetration or perforation. 34.3 No penetration or perforation > 30 in. tear No penetration or perforation. 32.5 No penetration or perforation. 33.5 No penetration or perforation. 33 No penetration or perforation. No penetration or perforation. 34.0 No penetration or perforation. 21 in. tear.
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. 20 Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description Metal (Wall/Roof) UF 21 Metal (Wall/Roof) UF 22 Metal (Wall/Roof) UF 23 Metal (Wall/Roof) UF 24 24 ga. standing seam panel (0.0228 in. thick, 55 ksi) Girts: Z 8.25, 6 ft. spacing 35.9 N/A 35.9 26 ga. standard panel (0.018 in. 35.1 thick, 55 ksi) Girts: Z 8.25, 6 ft. spacing 34.5 1.5 in. deep, 2.5 in. wide ribs spaced @ 6 in. o.c., 22 ga. steel roof deck, 10-ft span of deck sidelaped with #10 TEK screws spaced at 12 in. o.c. along the length of the span, K24 bar joists spaced at 5 ft. o.c. 1.5 in. deep, 2.5 in. wide ribs spaced @ 6 in. o.c., 18 ga. steel roof deck, 10-ft span of deck sidelaped with #10 TEK screws spaced at 12 in. o.c. along the length of the span, K24 bar joists spaced at 5 ft. o.c. > 34 > 34 > 34 > 34 > 34 Impact point at 12 in. above the girt. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at 10 in. above the girt. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at the center of the panel. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at 4 in. above the girt. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at the center of the panel. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at the center of the panel. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at 6 in. from the support. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at the center of the panel. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at 6 in. from the support. No penetration or perforation. Impact point at the supported edge of the panel. No penetration or perforation. 2 layers of 3/4 in. CD grade < 41 The missiles repercussed. plywood mounted with 3 in. #8 41-44 Threshold was observed plywood (Wall) wood deck screws at 6 in. on center The missile perforated the barrier to the double stud 4x4 ft frame. > 44 (failure). A-8
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 25 Wood/Metal (Wall) 26 Wood/Metal (Wall) 27 Metal (Wall) 28 Metal (Wall) 29 Metal (Wall) 30 Metal (Wall) Exterior: Hardipanel siding Interior: 5/8 in. plywood sheathing Vertical support: 2x4 in. wood studs or 3-5/8x1-3/8 in. steel studs @ 16 in. (max.) o.c. Exterior: Various layers of Dryvit products, Interior: 1/2 in. gypsum sheathing and 1/2 in. dens-glass gold, Vertical support: 3-5/8 in.x1-3/8 in.x18 ga. steel studs @ 16 o.c. Exterior: 24 ga. 0.0225 in. (min.) structural galvanized steel (11/2x36 in.) with horizontal girts Exterior: Grade 50, G90 galvanized steel with 0.031 in. min. thickness, Interior: Grade 50, G90 galvanized steel with 0.030 in. min. thickness, Core material: urathane foam Exterior: 3/16 in. natural stone veneer epoxy, vertical support: 16 ga. steel studs @ 24 in. o.c. (max.), channel @ 22-1/2 in. o.c. Exterior: 0.04 thick aluminum panel Interior: 0.035 thick aluminum panel G90 steel, Vertical support: 2x2 in. steel wall studs @ 22 in. o.c., 2 in. thick polystyrene insulation A-9
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 31 Metal (Wall) 32 Metal (Wall) 33 Metal (Wall) 34 Metal (Wall) 35 Metal (Wall) 36 Metal (Wall) 37 Metal (Wall) Exterior: 0.024 in. thick steel panel (50 Grade), support: Min. 16 ga. (0.056 ) Z girt @ 5 ft. o.c. (max.) Exterior: Vee Rib structural metal siding (24 ga., Grade 50, min. thickness 0.025 in.) support: Z girt @ 2 ft. up to 4 ft. Exterior: Style rib 20 ga. Metal panel support: JW studs: 8 in.x12 ga. (0.1004 in. thick) Exterior: 0.026 in. (min.) thick Rib- 12 structural panel (Grade 80), support: Z girt @ 4 ft. 10 in. o.c. Exterior: 24 ga. (min. thickness 0.024 in., Grade 50) Florida Rib Panel, support: Stringers (min. 16 ga., Grade 50) Exterior: 0.024 in. thick steel panel support: Z girt @ 4 ft. o.c. Exterior: 0.026 in. (min.) thick galvalume steel wall panel with insulation A-10
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 38 Metal (Wall) 39 Metal/Wood (Wall) 40 Metal (Wall) 41 Concrete (Wall) 42 43 Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Wall) Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Wall) Exterior: 24 ga. Structural Galvalume Steel (1-1/4 x 36 in. Kirby Rib) Wall Panel, Vertical support: 8 Z 12 ga. @ 4 ft. 10 in., Horizontal support: 9x5 in. C 12 ga. @ 8 ft. Exterior: Pro-panel II profile, 26 ga. (min.) Grade 50 steel, Interior: 5/8 in. thick CDX grade plywood, support: Girts: 2 x wood member, #2 SP, Studs: 2 x wood member, #2 SP Exterior: 26 ga. (thickness 0.018 in.) steel panel, Interior: 26 ga. (thickness 0.018 in.) steel panel, support: Girts: min 14 ga. @ 4 ft. o.c., Urethane core (3 in.). 3-D welded wire space frame integrated with a polystyrene insulation core. Wythes of concrete or mortar are applied to both sides. Exterior: 3/4 in. (min. thickness) GFRC panel, support: Min. 4x0.056 in. thick (Grade 50) studs @ 18 in. (max.) and steel bridging at max. 48 in. o.c. (min. 0.056 in. thick) Exterior: DuroCrete veneer, support: steel studs A-11
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 44 Wood (Roof) 45 Steel (Roof) 46 Steel (Roof) 47 Steel (Roof) 48 Steel (Roof) 49 Steel (Roof) 50 Steel (Roof) Deck: 19/32 in. or greater plywood or wood plank Deck: Superlock 16 22 ga. Standing Seam Metal Roof Panel, support: purlin Deck: Superlok 16 0.024 in. Structural Galvalume Coated Steel Standing Seam Roof Panel, support: purlin Deck: 0.026 in. (min.) Structural Galvalume Steel Rib-12 Roof Panel, support: purlin Deck: Rib Roof Structural Standing Seam Roof Panel Deck: 0.030 in. (min) Structural Loc-Seam 360 Galvalume Steel Roof Panel, support: purlin Deck: 0.0248 in. (min) SS-360 Structural Metal Roof Panel, support: purlin A-12
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 51 Steel (Roof) 52 Steel (Roof) 53 Steel (Roof) 54 Steel (Roof) 55 Steel (Roof) 56 Steel (Roof) 57 Steel (Roof) Deck: 0.03 in. (min) Structural Standing Seam 360 Steel Roof Panel (22 ga.), support: purlin Deck: 24 ga. Kirby Rib II Roof Panel, support: purlin Deck: 0.042 in. Structural Galvanized Steel Roof Panels, support: purlin Deck: 0.024 in. (min) Galvanized Steel Dyna-Rib Roof Panel, support: purlin Deck: 0.0325 in. (min) Structural Galvalume Coated Standing Seam Steel Roof panel, support: purlin Deck: 0.026 in. Galvalume Steel Roof Panel System, support: purlin Deck: 24 ga. (min. thickness 0.024 in.) Structural Steel Roof Panel, support: purlin A-13
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 58 Steel (Roof) 59 Steel (Roof) 60 Concrete FBC (2001) 61 Prestressed Concrete FBC (2001) 62 Metal (Roof) 63 Metal (Roof) 64 Metal (Roof) Architectural ing Inc., York, PA Architectural ing Inc., York, PA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Deck: 0.026 in. (min) UC-5 Structural Standing Seam Roof Panel Deck: Super Span 24 ga. (0.024 in. min. thickness) Steel Roof Panel Min. 4 in. thick precast concrete deck Min. 4 in. thick precast prestressed concrete deck Deck: Min. 24 ga steel or concrete Membrane: Min. 45 mil Carlisle non-reinforced, reinforced, or fleeceback EPDM, Insulation: Polyisocyanurate (16 psi), min. total thickness 1 in. Deck: Min. 24 ga steel or concrete Membrane: Min. 45 mil Carlisle reinforced or fleeseback TPO, Insulation: Polyisocyanurate (16 psi), min. total thickness 1 in. Deck: 22 ga., type B, Grade 33 galv. Steel deck, over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Fiber Tite, Insulation: Two layers, min. 1.5 in. thick ASTM C-1289 Type 2 polyisocyanurate A-14
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 65 Metal (Roof) 66 Metal (Roof) 67 Metal (Roof) 68 Metal (Roof) 69 Metal (Roof) Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Deck: 22 ga., type B, Grade 33 galv. Steel deck, over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Fiber Tite, XT, Insulation: Two layers, min. 1.5 in. thick ASTM C-1289 Type 2 polyisocyanurate Deck: 22 ga., type B, Grade 33 galv. Steel deck, over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Fiber Tite, Xtreme, Insulation: Two layers, min. 1.5 in. thick ASTM C-1289 Type 2 polyisocyanurate Deck: 22 ga., type B, Grade 33 galv. Steel deck, over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Fiber Tite, Xtreme, Coverboard: 1/4 in. thick Dens-Deck, Insulation: Two layers, min. 1.5 in. thick ASTM C-1289 Type 2 polyisocyanurate Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga Type B metal deck, galvanized, Membrane: Fiber Tite FB 45 mil, Insulation: 2 in. Elastizell lightweight insulating concrete (200 psi min.), over 3-1/2 in. Apache Holey Board Deck: 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Surnfil 10-S327, 80 mil thick (5/8 in. thick Dens- Deck) Insulation: One layer, 1.5 in. thick polyisocyanurate, AC Foam 2 A-15
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 70 Metal (Roof) 71 Metal (Roof) 72 Metal (Roof) 73 74 Metal/Concrete (Roof) Metal/Concrete (Roof) Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Deck: 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Surnfil 10-S327, 80 mil thick (1/2 in. thick High- Density Wood Fiberboard), Insulation: One layer, 1.5 in. thick polyisocyanurate, AC Foam 2 Deck: 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Surnfil 6-S327, 60 mil thick (5/8 in. thick Dens-Deck), Insulation: One layer, 1.5 in. thick polyisocyanurate, AC Foam 2 Deck: 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Surnfil 6-S327, 60 mil thick (1/2 in. thick High- Density Wood Fiberboard), Insulation: One layer, 1.5 in. thick polyisocyanurate, AC Foam 2 Deck: Galvanized 22 ga. Type B steel or concrete, Membrane: Stevens EP minimum 45 mil, Insulation: Two layers of 1.5 in. ASTM C-1289 type 2 polyisocyanurate Deck: Galvanized 22 ga. Type B steel or concrete, Membrane: Stevens EV minimum 45 mil, Insulation: Two layers of 1.5 in. ASTM C-1289 type 2 polyisocyanurate A-16
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 75 Metal (Roof) 76 Metal (Roof) 77 Metal (Roof) 78 Metal (Roof) Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga. Type B, profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Tripolymer FB, Insulation: One layer, 1.5 in. thick polyisocyanurate, ASTM C-1289, Type II Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga. Type B, profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Tripolymer FB, Insulation: 200 psi cellular lightweight concrete cast with ¼ in. slurry coat over steel deck followed by (optional) 1 in. Apache Holey Board and a 2 in. min. top coat Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga. corrugated metal deck, galvanized, Membrane: Layer #75 nailed base sheet, layer of polyster reinforced SBS modified bitumen (min. 0.16 in. thick) set in hot asphalt, Insulation: 2 in. Celcore cellular concrete over min. 1 in. thick celcore EPS Holey Board Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B metal deck, Membrane: GAF membrane, Insulation: 2 in. Elastizell lightweight insulating concrete (200 psi min.) A-17
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 79 Metal (Roof) 80 Metal (Roof) 81 Metal (Roof) 82 Metal (Roof) 83 Metal (Roof) Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B metal deck, Membrane: layers of Manville Dyna base sheet, Insulation: 2 in. Elastizell lightweight insulating concrete (200 psi min.) Deck: 22 ga., Type B Grade 33 profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Johns Manville Dynalastic 180 set, 180 FR, or 250 FR set in hot asphalt, Insulation: 3/4 in. Fesco Board or Dura Board adhered in hot asphalt Deck: 22 ga., Type B Grade 33 profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: Johns Manville DynaGrip cap FR, over Johns Manville DynaGrip base, Insulation: Min 1.5 in. Nailboard Deck: 22 ga., Type B Grade 33 profiled steel over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Membrane: layers of Johns Manville Dynalastic mat., Insulation: Min 1.5 in. Nailboard Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga. corrugated metal deck, galvanized, Membrane: Siplast: Parabase, P30HT FR Granulated Cap sheet, Insulation: 2 in. ZIC concrete over 3-1/2 in. Insultperm board A-18
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 84 Metal (Roof) 85 Metal (Roof) 86 Metal (Roof) 87 Metal (Roof) Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Deck: 15/16 in. deep, 24 ga. corrugated metal deck, galvanized Membrane: 2 layers of 250 gram polyster reinforced modified bitumen, Board: 3 layers of 1/2 in. Loadmaster Duraflex mineral board Deck: 15/16 in. deep, 24 ga. corrugated metal deck, galvanized Membrane: 2 layers of 250 gram polyster reinforced modified bitumen, Board: 3 layers of 1/2 in. Loadmaster Duraflex mineral board, with insulation Deck: 15/16 in. deep, 24 ga. corrugated metal deck, galvanized Membrane: 1 layer 250 gram, 1 layer 180 gram polyster reinforced modified bitumen, Board: 3 layers of ½ in. Loadmaster Duraflex mineral board, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade C profiled steel deck, over supports @ 5 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (X), Top sheet: Sopralene Flam, Insulation: Min. 1.5 in. thick polyisocyanurate A-19
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 88 Metal (Roof) 89 Metal (Roof) 90 Metal (Roof) 91 Metal (Roof) Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: ASTM D4601, type 2, Ply sheet: Sopreme cap membrane Top sheet: same as Ply sheet, with Insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: ASTM D4601, type 2, Ply sheet: Two or more plies of ASTM D2178, Type 4 or Type 6 ply sheet applied in hot asphalt Top sheet: Sopreme cap membrane, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (S, F, H or X), Top sheet: Sopreme cap membrane, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (S, F, H or X), Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation A-20
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 92 Metal (Roof) 93 Metal (Roof) 94 Metal (Roof) 95 Metal (Roof) Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (S, F or X), Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (S, F or X), with either 190 or 180 g/m 2 mat, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (S, F or X), with either 190 or 180 g/m 2 mat, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (X), Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation A-21
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 96 Metal (Roof) 97 Metal (Roof) 98 Metal (Roof) 99 Metal (Roof) Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (S or F), with either 190 or 180 g/m 2 mat, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet optional, Ply sheet: Elastophene 180 sanded; Sopralene 180, 250 or 350, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet optional, Ply sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Soprafix (S or F), Ply sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation A-22
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 100 Metal (Roof) 101 Metal (Roof) 102 Metal (Roof) 103 Metal (Roof) Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Exterior Research and Design, Seattle, WA Architectural ing Inc., York, PA Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet optional, Ply sheet: Sopralene 250 or 350, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Sopralene 180, 250 or 350, Ply sheet: Elastophene 180 sanded; Sopralene 180, 250 or 350, Top sheet: Sopralene 180, 250 or 350 GR or FR GR, with insulation Deck: 1-1/2 in. deep, 22 ga., Type B, Grade 33 profiled steel deck, over supports @ 4 ft. o.c., Base sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350, Ply sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350, Top sheet: Sopralene Flam 180, 250 or 350, with insulation 15/16 in. x 25 ga. Corrugated metal Metal paneling: 0.032 in. x 16 in. (24 ga.) Zip-rib panel by Merchant and Evans, Underlayment: 40 mil Duraclad, Board: 1 layer of ½ in. Loadmaster Duraflex mineral board, with insulation A-23
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 104 Metal (Roof) 105 Metal (Roof) 106 Metal (Roof) Hurricane Laboratory, Riviera Beach, FL Architectural ing Inc., York, PA Farabaugh Engineering and ing, Inc., Turtle Creek, PA LOC-seam 360 panels, 24 ga. steel (0.241) with 2 in. high seams at 16 in. o.c., Metal paneling: SS-360 panels, 24 ga steel with 3/32 in. high ribs at 5/16 in. o.c., Supports: 0.06 in. Z-shape, 8 in. deep, 2.5 in. flanges at 60 in. o.c. 1-15/32 in. deep, 0.030 in. thick, Type BR-28 corrugated metal deck, Membrane: Morin steel roof paneling 2-1/2 in. deep, 0.026 in. to 0.027 in. thick, with insulation MBCI Superlock, 24 ga. steel (0.023 in.) with 2 in. high seam at 16 in. o.c., Support: 16 ga structural member @ 5 ft. o.c. 107 Metal (Roof) Farabaugh Engineering and ing, Inc., Turtle Creek, PA MBCI Superlock, 24 ga. steel (0.023 in.) with 2 in. high seam at 16 in. o.c., Support: 16 ga structural member @ 5 ft. o.c., with insulation 108 Metal (Roof) Farabaugh Engineering and ing, Inc., Turtle Creek, PA MBCI R-Panel Standing Seam Roof Panel 36 in. wide, 24 ga. (0.023) with Superlock, 24 ga steel (0.023 in.) with 2 in. high seam at 16 in. o.c., Support: 16 ga structural member @ 5 ft. o.c., with insulation A-24
Table A.1: Wall/Roof Assemblies Passing Previous Basic Large Impact s (2x4 in. 9 lb missile @ 34 mph) contd. Wall/Roof System Source Sample Description 109 Metal (Roof) Farabaugh Engineering and ing, Inc., Turtle Creek, PA 1-1/2 in. x 22 ga. B-Deck Metal paneling: MBCI Superlock, 24 ga. steel (0.023 in.) at 16 in. o.c., with insulation 110 Metal (Roof) 111 Metal (Roof) 112 Metal (Roof) 113 Metal (Roof) 114 Metal (Roof) Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Certified ing Laboratories, Orlando, FL Hurricane Laboratory, Riviera Beach, FL Obtained from Florida Department of Education Force Engineering & ing, Inc., Humble, TX BEMO, USA 400 16 in. x 0.032 aluminum roofing panel system Support: 22 ga. x 50 ksi in. B in. profile steel deck, with insulation BEMO, USA 400 16 in. x 0.024 aluminum roofing panel system, Support: 14 ga. Z purlins @ 4 ft. oc over steel joist Berridge S metal deck, 7/8 in. deep x 24 ga., Metal paneling: Berridge Double-Locked Z-Lock, 24 ga. Purlins: 8 in. x 2-1/2 in., 16 ga. channel @ 4 ft. oc, with insulation Exterior: SUMTECH International, 22 ga., G-90 galvanized steel Interior: 26 ga., G-90 galvanized steel, with insulation UNACLAD/Copper Sales, Inc. 22 ga. steel UC5 Batten Seam, Support: 16 ga. steel purlins A-25