EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO NONLINEAR, SUBCRITICAL HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC DIRICHLET PROBLEMS WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH
|
|
- Emil Park
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO NONLINEAR, SUBCRITICAL HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC DIRICHLET PROBLEMS WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH Abstract. We consider the -th order elliptic boundary value problem Lu = f(x, u) on a bounded smooth domain Ω R N with Dirichlet boundary conditions on Ω. The operator L is a uniformly elliptic linear operator of order whose principle part is of the form ( N i,j= a ) ij(x) 2 m. x i x j We assume that f is superlinear at the origin and satisfies f(x,s) lim s s q = h(x), lim s f(x,s) s q = (x), where h, C(Ω) are positive functions and q > is subcritical. By combining degree theory with new and recently established a priori estimates, we prove the existence of a nontrivial solution.. Introduction Let Ω R N be a bounded smooth domain. On Ω we consider the uniformly elliptic operator (.) L = ( N 2 ) m a ij (x) + x i x j i,j= 0 α b α (x)d α with coefficients b α C α (Ω) and a ij C 2,α (Ω) such that there exists a constant λ > 0 with λ ξ 2 N i,j= a ij(x)ξ i ξ j λ ξ 2 for all ξ R N, x Ω. We are interested in nontrivial solutions of the semilinear boundary value problem (.2) Lu = f(x, u) in Ω, u = ( ) m ν u =... = u = 0 on Ω, ν where ν is the unit exterior normal on Ω and f is a nonlinearity which is to be specified later. The main difficulties in proving existence results for this problem are the following:. (.2) has no variational structure (in general), so critical point theorems do not apply; 2. The operator L does not satisfy the maximum principle (in general) unless m =. In the second order case, the maximum principle is a basic requirement to translate (.2) into a fixed point problem for an order preserving operator, which in turn maes it possible to use topological degree (or fixed point) theory in cones or invariant order intervals given by a pair of sub- and supersolutions. Date: June 2, Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 35J40; Secondary: 35B45. Key words and phrases. Higher order equation, existence, topological degree, Liouville theorems.
2 2 WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH 3. In the case m >, a priori bounds for (certain classes of) solutions are harder to obtain than in the second order case, which maes it difficult to find solutions to (.2) via global bifurcation theory. In a recent paper, we have proved a priori bounds for solutions of (.2) in the case of superlinear nonlinearities f(x, u) with subcritical growth satisfying an asymptotic condition. More precisely, we assumed: (H) f : Ω R R is uniformly continuous in bounded subsets of Ω R and there exists q > if N and < q < N+ if N > and two positive, continuous functions N, h : Ω (0, ) such that f(x, s) f(x, s) lim = h(x), lim = (x) uniformly with respect to x Ω. s + s q s s q Theorem (Reichel, Weth []). If f : Ω R R satisfies (H) then there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on the data a ij, b α, Ω, N, q, h, such that u C for every solution u C,α (Ω) of (.2). This result can be seen as a first step towards existence results via degree theory. In order to state the main theorem of the present paper, we introduce additional assumptions on f. (H2) For all x Ω the function f(x, s) is continuously differentiable with respect to s and f(x, s), s f(x, s) are α-hölder continuous in x uniformly for x Ω and s in bounded intervals. Moreover, f(x, 0) = s f(x, 0) = 0. (H3) The operator L has a bounded inverse L which maps C α (Ω) C,α (Ω) with Dirichlet boundary conditions of order up to m. Theorem 2. Suppose Ω R N is a bounded domain with Ω C,α. Let m N and assume f : Ω R R satisfies (H), (H2), (H3). Then (.2) has a nontrivial solution u C,α (Ω). We note that in many examples condition (H3) can be verified with the help of the Lax- Milgram Theorem and elliptic regularity, see Agmon, Douglis, Nirenberg []. In particular, if L is as in (.), then L + γ satisfies (H3) if γ > 0 is sufficiently large and if additionally b α C α m (Ω) for m < α <. This is true since the smoothness of the coefficients allows to write L in divergence form and hence the quadratic form associated with L + γ is coercive due to Garding s inequality, cf. Renardy-Rogers [2], if γ > 0 is sufficiently large. As an intermediate step in the proof of Theorem 2, we need to complement Theorem with the following a priori estimate for a parameter, which might be of independent interest. Theorem 3. Suppose Ω R N is a bounded domain with Ω C,α. Let m N and assume f : Ω R R satisfies (H). Then there exists a value Λ = Λ(Ω, L, f) such that for λ Λ the problem (.3) Lu = f(x, u) + λ in Ω, u = ( ) m ν u =... = u = 0 on Ω. ν has no solution u C,α (Ω).
3 EXISTENCE FOR NONLINEAR HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS 3 Due to the lac of the maximum principle for higher order equations, we have no sign information on the solution provided by Theorem 2. By the same reason, it is important that Theorems and 3 hold with no restriction on the sign of the solutions. We also point out that we mae no assumption concerning the shape of the domain. We recall that the proof of Theorems is carried out by a rescaling method in the spirit of the seminal wor of Gidas and Spruc [5] (but without a priori information on the sign of the solutions) and by investigating the corresponding limit problems. In particular, the following Liouville type theorems are used. Theorem 4 (Wei, Xu [4]). Let m N and assume that q > if N and < q < N+ N if N >. If u is a classical non-negative solution of (.4) ( ) m u = u q in R N, then u 0. Theorem 5. Let m N and assume that q > if N and < q N+ N If u is a classical non-negative solution of (.5) ( ) m u = u q in R N +, u = x u =... = m then u 0. x m u = 0 on R N + if N >. Here and in the following, we set R N + := {x R N : x > 0}. Theorem 5 is a slight generalization of Theorem 4 in our recent paper []. More precisely, it is assumed in [] that u is bounded, but an easy argument based on the doubling lemma of Poláči, Quittner and Souplet [0] shows that this additional assumption can be removed. See Section 4 below for details. Theorems 4 and 5 will also be used in the proof of Theorem 3. However, the rescaling argument is somewhat more involved since both λ and the L -norm of the solutions need to be controlled. Here various cases have to be distinguished, and additional limit problems arise. Finally we comment on some previous wor related to Theorem 2. If L = ( ) m is the polyharmonic operator, then (.2) has a variational structure. In this case existence and multiplicity results for solutions of (.2) have been obtained under additional assumptions on f via critical point theory and related techniques, see e.g. [3, 4, 6, 5] and the references therein. The approach via a priori estimates and degree theory was taen by Soranzo [3] and Oswald [9], but only in the special case where Ω is a ball. More precisely, in [9, 3] the authors first prove a priori estimates for radial positive solutions before proving existence results within this class of functions. An existence result for more general operators L was obtained in [7] for a different class of nonlinearities which gives rise to coercive nonlinear operators. See also the references in [7] for earlier results in this direction. The paper is organised as follows. Section 2 is devoted to the proof of Theorem 3, while Theorem 2 is proved in Section 3. Finally, in Section 4 we show how to remove the boundedness assumption which was present in the original formulation of Theorem 5.
4 4 WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH 2. Nonexistence for the parameter dependent problem The proof of Theorem 3 uses standard L p -W,p estimates for linear problems (2.) (2.2) Lu = g(x) in Ω, u = ν u =... = ( ) m u = 0 on Ω. ν Recall the following basic estimate of Agmon, Douglis, Nirenberg []. Theorem 6 (Agmon, Douglis, Nirenberg). Let Ω R N be a bounded domain with Ω C, m N. Let a ij C 2 (Ω), b α L (Ω), g L p (Ω) for some p (, ). Suppose u W,p (Ω) W m,p 0 (Ω) satisfies (2.). Then there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on a ij C 2, b α, λ, Ω, N, p, m and the modulus of continuity of a ij such that u W,p (Ω) C( g L p (Ω) + u L p (Ω)). We will also be using the following al analogue of this result. For a standard proof see []. Corollary 7. Let Ω be a ball {x R N : x < R} or a half-ball {x R N : x < R, x > 0}. Let m N, a ij C 2 (Ω), b α L (Ω), g L p (Ω) for some p (, ). Suppose u W,p (Ω) satisfies (2.) (i) either on the ball (ii) or on the half-ball together with the boundary conditions u = on {x R N : x < R, x = 0}. x u =... = m x m u = 0 Then there exists a constant C > 0 depending only on a ij C 2, b α, λ, Ω, N, p, m, the modulus of continuity of a ij and R such that for any σ (0, ) u W,p (Ω B σr ) C ( σ) ( g L p (Ω) + u L p (Ω)). It is sometimes convenient to rewrite the operator L in the form L = ( ) m a α (x)d α + c α (x)d α. α = 0 α Here a α (x) = a i i 2 (x) a i3 i 4 (x) a i i (x), where M α is the set of all vectors I = I M α (i,..., i ) {,..., N} satisfying #{j : i j = l} = α l for l =,..., N. Note that a α, c α are uniformly α-hölder continuous in Ω. Finally, the following lemma is used a number of times in the subsequent proof of Theorem 3. A version of part (a) of the lemma already appeared in Reichel, Weth [] and similar arguments have been used by Wei and Xu in [4].
5 EXISTENCE FOR NONLINEAR HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS 5 Lemma 8. (a) Let v be a strong W, (R N ) C (R N ) solution of ( ) m v g(v) in R N such that D α v is bounded for all multi-indices α with 0 α. If g : R [0, ) is convex and non-negative with g(s) > 0 for s < 0 then either v > 0 or v 0. (b) Let v be a strong W, (R N +) C (R N +) solution of ( ) m v in R N +. Then ( ) m v is unbounded. Proof. Part (a): Let v l := ( ) l v for l =,..., m and set v 0 = v. Then we have v 0 = v, v = v 2,... v m g(v 0 ) in R N. First we show that v l 0 in R N for l =,..., m. Assume that there exists l {,..., m } and x 0 R N with v l (x 0 ) < 0 but v j 0 in R N for j = l +,..., m. We may assume w.l.o.g. that x 0 = 0. If we define for a function w W 2, (RN ) C (R N ) spherical averages w(x) = r N ω N B r(0) w(y) dσ y, r = x then the radial functions v 0, v,..., v m satisfy v 0 = v, v = v 2,... v m g( v 0 ) in R N, where we have used Jensen s inequality and the convexity of g. Since v l (0) < 0 we also have v l (0) < 0. Moreover v l(r) = (2.3) ( v l )(rξ) ξ dσ ξ ω N B (0) = = v l+ (rξ)r dξ if l < m, ω N B ( v l )(rξ)r dξ (0) ω N B (0) g(v(rξ))r dξ if l = m. ω N Since the right-hand side is non-positive in both cases we obtain v l (r) v l (0) < 0. Integrating the inequality B (0) v l = v l v l (0) > 0 we obtain r N v l (r) rn N v l(0), i.e, v l (r) r N v l(0). The unboundedness of v l yields a contradiction. Next we show that v = v 0 0. Assume that v 0 (x 0 ) < 0 and w.l.o.g. x 0 = 0. Since v 0 = v 0 we see that v 0(r) 0 and we define α := lim r v 0 (r) < 0. Thus g( v 0 (r)) g(α) > 0 for r r 2 0. As in (2.3) we find v m (r) ω N = r N ω N r B (0) r r/2 g(v 0 (rξ))r dξ = 0 B s(0) s N r N g(α) 2 ds r N ω N g(v 0 (η)) dσ η ds B r(0) r 0 g(v 0 (η)) dη s N r N g( v 0(s)) ds
6 6 WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH if r 2r 0. Since the last term converges to as r we obtain a contradiction to the boundedness of v m. Finally the alternative v > 0 or v 0 follows since v 0 by the first part of the proof. Part (b): Let w := ( ) m v so that w is a strong W 2, (RN +) C (R N +) solution of w. Let w(r; X) := w(y) dσ r N y = w(x + rξ) dσ ξ ω N ω N B r(x) B (0) for X R N + and 0 < r < X. For fixed X R N + the function w satisfies w (r) = ( w)(x + rξ) ξ dσ ξ = ( w)(x + rξ)r dξ r ω N ω N N B (0) for 0 < r < X. Hence, w(r) w(0) r2. Letting X 2N and r tend to infinity we find that w cannot stay bounded. We now have all the tools to complete the Proof of Theorem 3. Assume for contradiction that there exists a sequence of pairs (u, λ ) of solutions of (.3) with λ for. Let M := u. By considering a suitable subsequence we can assume that there exists x Ω such that either M = u (x ) for all N or M = u (x ) for all N. Case : u stays bounded. W.l.o.g. we can assume 0 Ω and B δ (0) Ω for some δ > 0. Set v (x) := u (λ / x). Then v satisfies where L := ( ) m B (0) L v (x) = λ f(λ / x, v ) + in B λ / δ (0) α = ā α(λ / x)d α + λ α 0 α c α(λ / x)d α. By standard interior regularity on the ball B R (0) for any R > 0 and any p there exists a constant C p,r > 0 such that v W,p (B R (0)) C p,r uniformly in. For p sufficiently large and by passing to a subsequence (again denoted v ) we see that v v in C,α (R N ) and in W m,p (RN ) as for every R > 0, where v C,α (R N ) W m,p (RN ) is a bounded wea (and hence classical) solution of Lv = in R N, where L = ( ) m α = a α (0)D α = ( N 2 ) m. a ij (0) x i x j By a linear change of variables we may assume that v is a bounded, classical, entire solution of ( ) m v = in R N. Lemma 8(b) shows that we have reached a contradiction. i,j=
7 EXISTENCE FOR NONLINEAR HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS 7 Case 2: u is unbounded. For this case we need to discuss various sub-cases depending on the growth of the numbers ρ := M q dist(x, Ω), N. Passing to a subsequence, we may assume that either ρ or ρ ρ 0 as. Case 2.: ρ as. Again we need to distinguish two further possibilities. Let λ := λ /M q. Case 2..a: λ is bounded, i.e., up to selecting a subsequence, λ λ 0. Then we set v (y) := M u (M q y + x ) so that v = and either v (0) = for all N (positive blow-up) or v (0) = for all N (negative blow-up). Moreover we can assume that x x Ω. The functions v are well-defined on the sequence of balls B ρ (0) as and they satisfy L v (y) = ) (f(m q M q y + x, M v (y)) +λ } {{ } for y B ρ (0), where this time and L := ( ) m α = =:f (y) ā α(y)d α + ā α(y) := a α (M q y + x ), c α(y) := M 0 α α (q )( ) c α(y)d α c α (M q y + x ). By our assumption (H) on the nonlinearity f(x, s) we have that f L (B ρ (0)) is bounded in. Note that the ellipticity constant, the L -norm of the coefficients of L and the moduli of continuity of ā α are not larger then the one for the operator L. By applying Corollary 7 on the ball B R (0) for any R > 0 and any p there exists a constant C p,r > 0 such that v W,p (B R (0)) C p,r uniformly in. For large enough p we may extract a subsequence (again denoted v ) such that v v in C,α (B R (0)) as for every R > 0, where v C,α (R N ) is bounded with v = = ±v(0). Taing yet another subsequence we may assume that f F in L (K) as for every compact set K R N. Also we see that { h( x)v(y) q if v(y) > 0, (2.4) F (y) = ( x) v(y) q if v(y) < 0, because, e.g., if v(y) > 0 then there exists 0 such that v (y) > 0 for 0 and hence M v (y) as. Therefore (H) implies that f (y) h( x)v(y) q as, and a similar pointwise convergence holds at points where v(y) < 0. Finally, note that the pointwise convergence of f on the set Z + = {y R N : v(y) > 0} and Z = {y R N : v(y) < 0} determine due to the dominated convergence theorem the wea -limit F of f on the set Z + Z. Since c α(y) 0 and ā α(y) a α ( x) as and since, for any fixed p (, ),
8 8 WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH we may assume that v v in W,p solution of (2.5) Lv = F + λ in R N, where L = ( ) m (R N ) we find that v is a bounded, wea W m,p (RN )- α = a α ( x)d α = ( N 2 ) m. a ij ( x) y i y j Since F L (R N ) we get that v W,p (R N ) C,α (R N ) is a bounded, strong solution of (2.5). Because D v = 0 a.e. on the set {y R N : v(y) = 0} one finds that v is a strong solution of h( x)v(y) q + λ if v(y) > 0, (2.6) Lv = 0 if v(y) = 0, ( x) v(y) q + λ if v(y) < 0 in R N. Note that the right-hand side of (2.6) is larger or equal to g(v), where the function g is defined by { h( x)s q if s 0, (2.7) g(s) := ( x) s q if s 0. Since the function g is convex we can apply Lemma 8(a) and obtain v > 0. Thus v is a classical C,α (R N ) solution, and by a linear change of variables we may assume that v solves ( ) m v = h( x)v q + λ in R N, v(0) =. Clearly v and all its derivatives of order are bounded. If λ = 0 then Theorem 4 tells us that this is impossible. And if λ > 0 then Lemma 8(b) provides a contradiction. This finishes the proof in this case. Case 2..b: λ is unbounded, i.e., up to a subsequence λ. Now we set v (y) := M u (M q λ / y+x ). The functions v are again well defined on a sequence of expanding balls and satisfy (2.8) L v (y) = (f(m q λ M q λ / y + x, M v (y)) +λ } {{ } ), where this time with L := ( ) m α = ā α(y)d α + =:f (y) 0 α α (q )( ) λ α c α(y)d α ā α(y) := a α (M q λ / y + x ), c α(y) := M Arguing lie before we arrive at the situation that v v in W,p i,j= c α (M q λ / y + x ). (R N ) as, where, modulo a linear change of variables, v C,α (R N ) W,p (R N ) is a bounded strong (and hence classical) solution of ( ) m v = in R N. A contradiction is reached via Lemma 8(b). Case 2.2: ρ ρ 0. Then, modulo a subsequence, x x Ω as, and after translation we may assume that x = 0. By flattening the boundary through a al
9 EXISTENCE FOR NONLINEAR HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS 9 change of coordinates we may assume that near x = 0 the boundary is contained in the hyperplane x = 0, and that x > 0 corresponds to points inside Ω. Since Ω is ally a C,α -manifold, this change of coordinates transforms the operator L into a similar operator which satisfies the same hypotheses as L. For simplicity we call the transformed variables x, the transformed domain Ω and the transformed operator L. Note that dist(x, Ω) = x, for sufficiently large. By passing to a subsequence we may assume that this is true for every, so that ρ = M q x,. As before we need to distinguish two further possibilities by defining λ := λ /M q. Case 2.2.a: Up to selecting a subsequence assume that λ λ 0. In this case we define the function v, the coefficients ā α, c α and the operator L as in Case 2..a, where v is now defined on the set {y R N : M q y + x Ω} which contains B ρ (0). Then we mae another change of coordinates, defining w (z) := v (z ρ e ), ã α(z) := ā α(z ρ e ), c α(z) := c α(z ρ e ), where e = (, 0,..., 0) R N is the first coordinate vector, and liewise the operator L. Note that w, ã α, c α and the operator L are defined on the set Ω := {z R N : M q z + (0, x,2,..., x,n ) Ω}, and that w (ρ e ) = ±. We now fix R > 0 and let B + R = B R(0) R N +. By our assumptions on the boundary Ω near x, we have B + R Ω for sufficiently large. Moreover, w satisfies L w (z) = f (z) + λ in B + R, where f (z) := M q f(m q z + (0, x,2,..., x,n ), M w (z)), together with Dirichlet-boundary conditions on {z R N : z < R, z = 0}. Hence we may apply Corollary 7 on the half-ball B + R and find that for any p there exists a constant C p,r > 0 such that w W,p (B + R ) C p,r uniformly in. By the Sobolev embedding theorem, this implies that v is bounded on B + R independently of, and since = v (0) v } {{ } (ρ, 0,..., 0) ρ } {{ } v, =± =0 we see that ρ = lim ρ > 0. As in Case 2..a we can now extract convergent subsequences w w in C,α (R N +) and f F in L (R N +) as, where F 0, 0 is determined in the same way as in Case 2..a. This time, w is a bounded, strong W,p (R N +) C,α (R N +)- solution of Lw = F + λ in R N +, z w =... = m z m w = 0 on R N +
10 0 WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH with L as in (2.5). By a linear change of variables we may assume that w solves (2.9) ( ) m w = g(w) + λ in R N +, z w =... = m z m w = 0 on R N +, where g is defined as in (2.7) of Case 2..a. The representation formula of Theorem 9 in [] applies and shows that w is nonnegative, so that g(w(z)) = h( x)w(z) q. Moreover, w(ρe ) = lim w (ρ e ) =, so that w is a positive, bounded and classical solution C -solution of ( ) m w = h( x)w q +λ in R N + with Dirichlet boundary conditions on R N +. A contradiction is reached by either Theorem 5 if λ = 0 or Lemma 8(b) if λ > 0. Case 2.2.b: Up to selecting a subsequence λ. In this case we need to define v as in Case 2..b, which is now well-defined on the set Σ := {y R N : M q λ / y + x Ω} and satisfies (2.8) on this set. By our assumptions on the boundary of Ω near x, we have dist(0, Σ ) = M q λ / x, = ρ λ/ =: τ for all. Passing to a subsequence, we may assume that either τ or τ τ 0 as. In the former case we come to a contradiction as in Case 2..b, since then v is well defined and bounded on a sequence of expanding balls. In the latter case we proceed completely analogously as in Case 2.2.a with ρ replaced by τ for every. The only difference is that in this case, modulo a linear change of variables, we end up with a bounded strong classical solution of ( ) m v = in R N +. Again a contradiction is reached via Lemma 8(b). Since in all cases we obtained a contradiction, the proof of Theorem 3 is finished. 3. Proof of the existence result In this section we complete the proof of Theorem 3. Finding a solution u C,α (Ω) of (.3) is equivalent to finding a solution u C α (Ω) of the equation (3.) [Id K λ ](u) = 0 where for λ R the nonlinear operator K λ : C α (Ω) C α (Ω) is defined by K λ (u) = L w with w(x) = f(x, u(x)) + λ. By assumption (H3) we may regard L : C α (Ω) C,α (Ω) as a bounded linear operator. Moreover, since the embedding C,α (Ω) C α (Ω) is compact, K λ is also compact for every λ R. Let Λ > 0 be as in Theorem 3 so that (3.) has no solution for λ Λ. By Theorem there exists K > 0 such that for all λ [0, Λ] any solution u C α (Ω) of (3.) satisfies u K. By elliptic regularity and (H3) we may assume u C α (Ω) K by adjusting K. Consequently, we find that (3.2) [Id K λ ](u) 0 if (u, λ) (B 2K (0) {λ}) ( B 2K (0) [0, Λ]),
11 EXISTENCE FOR NONLINEAR HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS where B 2K (0) C α (Ω) denotes the 2K-ball with respect to C α (Ω). invariance of the Leray-Schauder degree and and (3.2) imply deg(id K 0, B 2K (0), 0) = deg(id K Λ ), B 2K (0), 0) = 0. The homotopy For these and other properties of the Leray-Schauder degree, we refer the reader to [2, Chapter 2.8] or [8, Chapter 2]. Next we note that 0 is an isolated solution of (3.) for λ = 0. Indeed, assume that there exists a sequence of solutions u n of (3.) with λ = 0 and u n C α 0 as n. Let v n := u n / u n. Since by (H2) f(x, s) = O(s 2 ) uniformly in x Ω for s in bounded intervals, we conclude that Lv n = f(x, u n )/ u n 0 as n so that v n 0 as n, which is a contradiction. Moreover, since s f(x, 0) = 0 by (H2), the derivative dk 0 (0) : C α (Ω) C α (Ω) of K 0 at u = 0 vanishes. Hence, for small ɛ > 0, we have by [8, Theorem 2.8.] deg(id K 0, B ɛ (0), 0) = deg(id dk 0 (0), B ɛ (0), 0) = deg(id, B ɛ (0), 0) =. The additivity property of the topological degree now implies that deg(id K 0, B 2K (0) \ B ɛ (0), 0) 0, hence there exists u B 2K (0) \ B ɛ (0) such that u K 0 (u) = 0. Therefore u is a nontrivial solution of (3.). 4. Proof of Theorem 5 In section we show how Theorem 5 can be deduced from [, Theorem 4] with the help of the doubling lemma of Poláči, Quittner and Souplet [0]. We recall the following simple special case of this useful lemma. Lemma 9. (cf. [0]) Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and M : X (0, ) be bounded on compact subsets of X. Then for any y X and any > 0 there exists x X such that M(x) M(y) and M(z) 2M(x) for all z B /M(x) (x). This follows by taing D = Σ = X in [0, Lemma 5.], so that Γ := Σ \ D = and therefore dist(y, Γ) = for all y X. We now may complete the proof of Theorem 5. Suppose by contradiction that there exists an unbounded solution u of (.5), and put M := u q : R N + R. Then there exists a sequence (y ) R N + such that M(y ) as n. By Lemma 9, applied within the underlying complete metric space X := R N +, there exist another sequence (x ) R N + such that M(x ) M(y ) and M(z) 2M(x ) for all z B /M(x )(x ) R N +. We then define ρ := x, M(x ), the affine halfspace H := {ζ R N function ũ : H R, ũ (ζ) = u(x + ζ ) M(x ) u(x ) : ζ > ρ } and the
12 2 WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH for N. Then ũ is a nonnegative solution of ( ) m ũ = ũ q in H, (4.) ũ = ( ) ũ = = m ũ = 0 on H ζ ζ such that ũ (0) = and ũ (ζ) 2 q for all ζ H B (0). We may now pass to a subsequence and distinguish two cases: Case : ρ as. In this case Corollary 7(i) implies that the sequence (ũ ) is ally W,p -bounded on R N, therefore we can extract a convergent subsequence ũ ũ in C,α (R N ), where ũ is a solution of (.4) satisfying u(0) =. By Theorem 4 we obtain a contradiction. Case 2: ρ ρ 0 as. In the case we perform a further change of coordinates, defining v (z) := ũ (z ρ e ) for z R N +, where again e = (, 0,..., 0) R N is the first coordinate vector. Then v is a nonnegative solution of ( ) m v = v q in R N +, v = z v = = ( z ) m v = 0 on R N +, while v (ρ e ) = and v (z) 2 q for all z B (ρ e ) R N +. Using now Corollary 7(ii), we deduce that the sequence (v ) is ally W,p -bounded in R N +. In particular v remains bounded independently of in a neighborhood of the origin, which in view of the boundary conditions implies that ρ = lim ρ > 0. We can therefore extract a convergent subsequence v v in C,α (R N +), where v is a solution of (.5) satisfying v(ρe ) = and v(z) 2 q for z R N +. This contradicts [, Theorem 4], and the proof is finished. References [] S. Agmon, A. Douglis and L. Nirenberg: Estimates near the boundary for solutions of elliptic partial differential equations satisfying general boundary conditions. I. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2 (959), [2] K. Deimling: Nonlinear functional analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 985. [3] D.E. Edmunds, D. Fortunato, E. Jannelli: Critical exponents, critical dimensions and the biharmonic operator. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 2 (990), [4] F. Gazzola, H.-C. Grunau and M. Squassina: Existence and nonexistence results for critical growth biharmonic equations. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 8 (2003), [5] B. Gidas and J. Spruc: A priori bounds for positive solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 6 (98), [6] H.-C. Grunau, Positive solutions to semilinear polyharmonic Dirichlet problems involving critical Sobolev exponents. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 3 (995),
13 EXISTENCE FOR NONLINEAR HIGHER-ORDER ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS 3 [7] H.-C. Grunau, G. Sweers: Classical solutions for some higher order semilinear elliptic equations under wea growth conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 28 (997), [8] L. Nirenberg: Topics in nonlinear functional analysis. Lecture Notes, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New Yor University, New Yor, 974. [9] P. Oswald: On a priori estimates for positive solutions of a semilinear biharmonic equation in a ball. Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 26 (985), [0] P. Poláči, P. Quittner and Ph. Souplet: Singularity and decay estimates in superlinear problems via Liouville-type theorems, I: Elliptic equations and systems. Due Math. J. 39 (2007), [] W. Reichel and T. Weth: A priori bounds and a Liouville theorem on a half-space for higher-order elliptic Dirichlet problems. Math. Z. 26 (2009), [2] M. Renardy and R.C. Rogers: An introduction to partial differential equations. Springer-Verlag, New- Yor, 993. [3] R. Soranzo: A priori estimates and existence of positive solutions of a superlinear polyharmonic equation. Dynam. Systems Appl. 3 (994), [4] Juncheng Wei and Xingwang Xu: Classification of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations. Math. Ann. 33 (999), [5] T. Weth: Nodal solutions to superlinear biharmonic equations via decomposition in dual cones. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 28 (2006), W. Reichel Institut für Analysis, Universität Karlsruhe, D-7628 Karlsruhe, Germany address: wolfgang.reichel@math.uni-arlsruhe.de T. Weth Institut für Mathemati, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Franfurt D Franfurt, Germany address: weth@math.uni-franfurt.de
A PRIORI ESTIMATES FOR SEMISTABLE SOLUTIONS OF SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS. In memory of Rou-Huai Wang
A PRIORI ESTIMATES FOR SEMISTABLE SOLUTIONS OF SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS XAVIER CABRÉ, MANEL SANCHÓN, AND JOEL SPRUCK In memory of Rou-Huai Wang 1. Introduction In this note we consider semistable
More informationExtremal equilibria for reaction diffusion equations in bounded domains and applications.
Extremal equilibria for reaction diffusion equations in bounded domains and applications. Aníbal Rodríguez-Bernal Alejandro Vidal-López Departamento de Matemática Aplicada Universidad Complutense de Madrid,
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear
More information1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1
Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or
More informationReference: Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by G. Folland, 1995, Chap. 3.
5 Potential Theory Reference: Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by G. Folland, 995, Chap. 3. 5. Problems of Interest. In what follows, we consider Ω an open, bounded subset of R n with C 2
More informationSeparation Properties for Locally Convex Cones
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 9 (2002), No. 1, 301 307 Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones Walter Roth Department of Mathematics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
More information2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems
42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions
More informationExistence de solutions à support compact pour un problème elliptique quasilinéaire
Existence de solutions à support compact pour un problème elliptique quasilinéaire Jacques Giacomoni, Habib Mâagli, Paul Sauvy Université de Pau et des Pays de l Adour, L.M.A.P. Faculté de sciences de
More informationFACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z
FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization
More informationEXISTENCE AND NON-EXISTENCE RESULTS FOR A NONLINEAR HEAT EQUATION
Sixth Mississippi State Conference on Differential Equations and Computational Simulations, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 5 (7), pp. 5 65. ISSN: 7-669. UL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu
More informationIRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction
IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL R. DRNOVŠEK, T. KOŠIR Dedicated to Prof. Heydar Radjavi on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Abstract. Let S be an irreducible
More informationCONSTANT-SIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE p-laplacian. Pasquale Candito and Giuseppina D Aguí
Opuscula Math. 34 no. 4 2014 683 690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2014.34.4.683 Opuscula Mathematica CONSTANT-SIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE p-laplacian Pasquale
More informationNo: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics
No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results
More informationProperties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO
Properties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO R. L. Johnson and C. J. Neugebauer The main result says that a non-negative BMO-function w, whose reciprocal is also in BMO, belongs to p> A p,and
More informationMetric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics
Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some
More informationSome remarks on Phragmén-Lindelöf theorems for weak solutions of the stationary Schrödinger operator
Wan Boundary Value Problems (2015) 2015:239 DOI 10.1186/s13661-015-0508-0 R E S E A R C H Open Access Some remarks on Phragmén-Lindelöf theorems for weak solutions of the stationary Schrödinger operator
More informationShape Optimization Problems over Classes of Convex Domains
Shape Optimization Problems over Classes of Convex Domains Giuseppe BUTTAZZO Dipartimento di Matematica Via Buonarroti, 2 56127 PISA ITALY e-mail: buttazzo@sab.sns.it Paolo GUASONI Scuola Normale Superiore
More informationCHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY
January 10, 2010 CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY The set of polynomials over a field F is a ring, whose structure shares with the ring of integers many characteristics.
More informationIrreducibility criteria for compositions and multiplicative convolutions of polynomials with integer coefficients
DOI: 10.2478/auom-2014-0007 An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 221),2014, 73 84 Irreducibility criteria for compositions and multiplicative convolutions of polynomials with integer coefficients Anca
More informationTheory of Sobolev Multipliers
Vladimir G. Maz'ya Tatyana O. Shaposhnikova Theory of Sobolev Multipliers With Applications to Differential and Integral Operators ^ Springer Introduction Part I Description and Properties of Multipliers
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationIdeal Class Group and Units
Chapter 4 Ideal Class Group and Units We are now interested in understanding two aspects of ring of integers of number fields: how principal they are (that is, what is the proportion of principal ideals
More informationPrime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials
Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.
More informationSome Polynomial Theorems. John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.
Some Polynomial Theorems by John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.com This paper contains a collection of 31 theorems, lemmas,
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are
More informationDuality of linear conic problems
Duality of linear conic problems Alexander Shapiro and Arkadi Nemirovski Abstract It is well known that the optimal values of a linear programming problem and its dual are equal to each other if at least
More informationDate: April 12, 2001. Contents
2 Lagrange Multipliers Date: April 12, 2001 Contents 2.1. Introduction to Lagrange Multipliers......... p. 2 2.2. Enhanced Fritz John Optimality Conditions...... p. 12 2.3. Informative Lagrange Multipliers...........
More informationINDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS
INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS STEVEN P. LALLEY AND ANDREW NOBEL Abstract. It is shown that there are no consistent decision rules for the hypothesis testing problem
More informationExample 4.1 (nonlinear pendulum dynamics with friction) Figure 4.1: Pendulum. asin. k, a, and b. We study stability of the origin x
Lecture 4. LaSalle s Invariance Principle We begin with a motivating eample. Eample 4.1 (nonlinear pendulum dynamics with friction) Figure 4.1: Pendulum Dynamics of a pendulum with friction can be written
More informationAdaptive Online Gradient Descent
Adaptive Online Gradient Descent Peter L Bartlett Division of Computer Science Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94709 bartlett@csberkeleyedu Elad Hazan IBM Almaden Research Center 650
More informationOSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS
OSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS KEITH CONRAD Ostrowski classified the nontrivial absolute values on Q: up to equivalence, they are the usual (archimedean) absolute value and the p-adic absolute values for
More informationON LIMIT LAWS FOR CENTRAL ORDER STATISTICS UNDER POWER NORMALIZATION. E. I. Pancheva, A. Gacovska-Barandovska
Pliska Stud. Math. Bulgar. 22 (2015), STUDIA MATHEMATICA BULGARICA ON LIMIT LAWS FOR CENTRAL ORDER STATISTICS UNDER POWER NORMALIZATION E. I. Pancheva, A. Gacovska-Barandovska Smirnov (1949) derived four
More informationSets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces
Communications in Mathematical Physics Manuscript-Nr. (will be inserted by hand later) Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces Stefan Bechtluft-Sachs, Marco Hien Naturwissenschaftliche
More informationb i (x) u x i + F (x, u),
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 14, 1999, 275 293 TOPOLOGICAL DEGREE FOR A CLASS OF ELLIPTIC OPERATORS IN R n Cristelle Barillon Vitaly A. Volpert
More informationORIENTATIONS. Contents
ORIENTATIONS Contents 1. Generators for H n R n, R n p 1 1. Generators for H n R n, R n p We ended last time by constructing explicit generators for H n D n, S n 1 by using an explicit n-simplex which
More informationRIGIDITY OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPS BETWEEN FIBER SPACES
RIGIDITY OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPS BETWEEN FIBER SPACES GAUTAM BHARALI AND INDRANIL BISWAS Abstract. In the study of holomorphic maps, the term rigidity refers to certain types of results that give us very specific
More informationFurther Study on Strong Lagrangian Duality Property for Invex Programs via Penalty Functions 1
Further Study on Strong Lagrangian Duality Property for Invex Programs via Penalty Functions 1 J. Zhang Institute of Applied Mathematics, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing
More informationON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS
ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS DANIEL RABAYEV AND JACK SONN Abstract. Let f(x) be a monic polynomial in Z[x] with no rational roots but with roots in Q p for
More informationInner Product Spaces
Math 571 Inner Product Spaces 1. Preliminaries An inner product space is a vector space V along with a function, called an inner product which associates each pair of vectors u, v with a scalar u, v, and
More informationHOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS. n!f n (1) lim. ln x n! + xn x. 1 = G n 1 (x). (2) k + 1 n. (n 1)!
Math 7 Fall 205 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS Problem. 2008 B2 Let F 0 x = ln x. For n 0 and x > 0, let F n+ x = 0 F ntdt. Evaluate n!f n lim n ln n. By directly computing F n x for small n s, we obtain the following
More informationMA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.
MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples
More informationF. ABTAHI and M. ZARRIN. (Communicated by J. Goldstein)
Journal of Algerian Mathematical Society Vol. 1, pp. 1 6 1 CONCERNING THE l p -CONJECTURE FOR DISCRETE SEMIGROUPS F. ABTAHI and M. ZARRIN (Communicated by J. Goldstein) Abstract. For 2 < p
More informationt := maxγ ν subject to ν {0,1,2,...} and f(x c +γ ν d) f(x c )+cγ ν f (x c ;d).
1. Line Search Methods Let f : R n R be given and suppose that x c is our current best estimate of a solution to P min x R nf(x). A standard method for improving the estimate x c is to choose a direction
More informationChapter 7. Continuity
Chapter 7 Continuity There are many processes and eects that depends on certain set of variables in such a way that a small change in these variables acts as small change in the process. Changes of this
More informationCHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.
CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,
More informationBANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW
BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but
More informationMetric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009)
1 Distance J Muscat 1 Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009) (A revised and expanded version of these notes are now published by Springer.) 1 Distance A metric space can be thought of
More informationPacific Journal of Mathematics
Pacific Journal of Mathematics GLOBAL EXISTENCE AND DECREASING PROPERTY OF BOUNDARY VALUES OF SOLUTIONS TO PARABOLIC EQUATIONS WITH NONLOCAL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS Sangwon Seo Volume 193 No. 1 March 2000
More information8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties
8 De Rham cohomology Last updated: May 21, 211. 8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties A k-form ω Ω k (M) is closed if dω =. It is exact if there is a (k 1)-form σ Ω k 1 (M) such that dσ = ω.
More informationDEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS
DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS ASHER M. KACH, KAREN LANGE, AND REED SOLOMON Abstract. We construct two computable presentations of computable torsion-free abelian groups, one of isomorphism
More informationON SEQUENTIAL CONTINUITY OF COMPOSITION MAPPING. 0. Introduction
ON SEQUENTIAL CONTINUITY OF COMPOSITION MAPPING Abstract. In [1] there was proved a theorem concerning the continuity of the composition mapping, and there was announced a theorem on sequential continuity
More informationQuasi Contraction and Fixed Points
Available online at www.ispacs.com/jnaa Volume 2012, Year 2012 Article ID jnaa-00168, 6 Pages doi:10.5899/2012/jnaa-00168 Research Article Quasi Contraction and Fixed Points Mehdi Roohi 1, Mohsen Alimohammady
More informationClassification of Cartan matrices
Chapter 7 Classification of Cartan matrices In this chapter we describe a classification of generalised Cartan matrices This classification can be compared as the rough classification of varieties in terms
More informationClass Meeting # 1: Introduction to PDEs
MATH 18.152 COURSE NOTES - CLASS MEETING # 1 18.152 Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck Class Meeting # 1: Introduction to PDEs 1. What is a PDE? We will be studying functions u = u(x
More informationFIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS
FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS Robert F. Brown Department of Mathematics University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095 e-mail: rfb@math.ucla.edu Christina L. Soderlund Department of Mathematics
More informationHow To Prove The Dirichlet Unit Theorem
Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if
More informationAn Introduction to the Navier-Stokes Initial-Boundary Value Problem
An Introduction to the Navier-Stokes Initial-Boundary Value Problem Giovanni P. Galdi Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Pittsburgh, USA Rechts auf zwei hohen Felsen befinden sich Schlösser,
More informationMATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.
MATH 45, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS. Exercise. a Is the operator L defined on smooth functions of x, y by L u := u xx + cosu linear? b Does the answer change if we replace the operator L by the operator
More informationON FIBER DIAMETERS OF CONTINUOUS MAPS
ON FIBER DIAMETERS OF CONTINUOUS MAPS PETER S. LANDWEBER, EMANUEL A. LAZAR, AND NEEL PATEL Abstract. We present a surprisingly short proof that for any continuous map f : R n R m, if n > m, then there
More informationNotes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory. 1 Walrasian Equilibrium and Excess Demand
Notes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory In this lecture we go on considering a general equilibrium model of a private ownership economy. In contrast to the Notes IV, we focus on positive issues such
More informationH/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems
H/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems Ch. 4.1, Problem 5 (a) Find the number of roots of x x in Z 4, Z Z, any integral domain, Z 6. (b) Find a commutative ring in which x x has infinitely many roots.
More informationHøgskolen i Narvik Sivilingeniørutdanningen STE6237 ELEMENTMETODER. Oppgaver
Høgskolen i Narvik Sivilingeniørutdanningen STE637 ELEMENTMETODER Oppgaver Klasse: 4.ID, 4.IT Ekstern Professor: Gregory A. Chechkin e-mail: chechkin@mech.math.msu.su Narvik 6 PART I Task. Consider two-point
More informationit is easy to see that α = a
21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore
More informationSystems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions
Chapter 6 Systems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions Facts that are recalled in the problems wt) = ut) + 1 c A 1 s ] R c t s)) hws) + Ks r)wr)dr ds. 6.1) w = w +
More informationRolle s Theorem. q( x) = 1
Lecture 1 :The Mean Value Theorem We know that constant functions have derivative zero. Is it possible for a more complicated function to have derivative zero? In this section we will answer this question
More informationFIELDS-MITACS Conference. on the Mathematics of Medical Imaging. Photoacoustic and Thermoacoustic Tomography with a variable sound speed
FIELDS-MITACS Conference on the Mathematics of Medical Imaging Photoacoustic and Thermoacoustic Tomography with a variable sound speed Gunther Uhlmann UC Irvine & University of Washington Toronto, Canada,
More informationVERTICES OF GIVEN DEGREE IN SERIES-PARALLEL GRAPHS
VERTICES OF GIVEN DEGREE IN SERIES-PARALLEL GRAPHS MICHAEL DRMOTA, OMER GIMENEZ, AND MARC NOY Abstract. We show that the number of vertices of a given degree k in several kinds of series-parallel labelled
More informationMetric Spaces. Chapter 1
Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence
More informationConvex Rationing Solutions (Incomplete Version, Do not distribute)
Convex Rationing Solutions (Incomplete Version, Do not distribute) Ruben Juarez rubenj@hawaii.edu January 2013 Abstract This paper introduces a notion of convexity on the rationing problem and characterizes
More informationResearch Article Stability Analysis for Higher-Order Adjacent Derivative in Parametrized Vector Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2010, Article ID 510838, 15 pages doi:10.1155/2010/510838 Research Article Stability Analysis for Higher-Order Adjacent Derivative
More informationOn the existence of multiple principal eigenvalues for some indefinite linear eigenvalue problems
RACSAM Rev. R. Acad. Cien. Serie A. Mat. VOL. 97 (3), 2003, pp. 461 466 Matemática Aplicada / Applied Mathematics Comunicación Preliminar / Preliminary Communication On the existence of multiple principal
More informationNOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS
NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS Definition 1. Let V and W be vector spaces. A function T : V W is a linear transformation from V to W if the following two properties hold. i T v + v = T v + T v for all
More informationGeneral Theory of Differential Equations Sections 2.8, 3.1-3.2, 4.1
A B I L E N E C H R I S T I A N U N I V E R S I T Y Department of Mathematics General Theory of Differential Equations Sections 2.8, 3.1-3.2, 4.1 Dr. John Ehrke Department of Mathematics Fall 2012 Questions
More informationLECTURE 1: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. 1. 1-forms on R n
LECTURE 1: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS 1. 1-forms on R n In calculus, you may have seen the differential or exterior derivative df of a function f(x, y, z) defined to be df = f f f dx + dy + x y z dz. The expression
More informationCost Minimization and the Cost Function
Cost Minimization and the Cost Function Juan Manuel Puerta October 5, 2009 So far we focused on profit maximization, we could look at a different problem, that is the cost minimization problem. This is
More informationStochastic Inventory Control
Chapter 3 Stochastic Inventory Control 1 In this chapter, we consider in much greater details certain dynamic inventory control problems of the type already encountered in section 1.3. In addition to the
More informationIn memory of Lars Hörmander
ON HÖRMANDER S SOLUTION OF THE -EQUATION. I HAAKAN HEDENMALM ABSTRAT. We explain how Hörmander s classical solution of the -equation in the plane with a weight which permits growth near infinity carries
More informationIntroduction to Algebraic Geometry. Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points
Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points 1. The resultant. Let K be a field. Then the polynomial ring K[x] is a unique factorisation domain (UFD). Another example of a
More informationProbability Generating Functions
page 39 Chapter 3 Probability Generating Functions 3 Preamble: Generating Functions Generating functions are widely used in mathematics, and play an important role in probability theory Consider a sequence
More informationPUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.
PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include
More information1 Local Brouwer degree
1 Local Brouwer degree Let D R n be an open set and f : S R n be continuous, D S and c R n. Suppose that the set f 1 (c) D is compact. (1) Then the local Brouwer degree of f at c in the set D is defined.
More informationON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE. 1. Introduction
ON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE J.M. CALABUIG, J. RODRÍGUEZ, AND E.A. SÁNCHEZ-PÉREZ Abstract. Let m be a vector measure taking values in a Banach space X. We prove that
More informationSOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS
SOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS Ivan Kolář Abstract. Let F be a fiber product preserving bundle functor on the category FM m of the proper base order r. We deduce that the r-th
More informationDEGREE THEORY E.N. DANCER
DEGREE THEORY E.N. DANCER References: N. Lloyd, Degree theory, Cambridge University Press. K. Deimling, Nonlinear functional analysis, Springer Verlag. L. Nirenberg, Topics in nonlinear functional analysis,
More informationSome Problems of Second-Order Rational Difference Equations with Quadratic Terms
International Journal of Difference Equations ISSN 0973-6069, Volume 9, Number 1, pp. 11 21 (2014) http://campus.mst.edu/ijde Some Problems of Second-Order Rational Difference Equations with Quadratic
More informationDISINTEGRATION OF MEASURES
DISINTEGRTION OF MESURES BEN HES Definition 1. Let (, M, λ), (, N, µ) be sigma-finite measure spaces and let T : be a measurable map. (T, µ)-disintegration is a collection {λ y } y of measures on M such
More informationInternational Journal of Information Technology, Modeling and Computing (IJITMC) Vol.1, No.3,August 2013
FACTORING CRYPTOSYSTEM MODULI WHEN THE CO-FACTORS DIFFERENCE IS BOUNDED Omar Akchiche 1 and Omar Khadir 2 1,2 Laboratory of Mathematics, Cryptography and Mechanics, Fstm, University of Hassan II Mohammedia-Casablanca,
More informationChapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.
Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize
More informationBreaking The Code. Ryan Lowe. Ryan Lowe is currently a Ball State senior with a double major in Computer Science and Mathematics and
Breaking The Code Ryan Lowe Ryan Lowe is currently a Ball State senior with a double major in Computer Science and Mathematics and a minor in Applied Physics. As a sophomore, he took an independent study
More information1 Introduction. Linear Programming. Questions. A general optimization problem is of the form: choose x to. max f(x) subject to x S. where.
Introduction Linear Programming Neil Laws TT 00 A general optimization problem is of the form: choose x to maximise f(x) subject to x S where x = (x,..., x n ) T, f : R n R is the objective function, S
More informationLecture 7: Finding Lyapunov Functions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.243j (Fall 2003): DYNAMICS OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Lecture 7: Finding Lyapunov Functions 1
More informationOn a comparison result for Markov processes
On a comparison result for Markov processes Ludger Rüschendorf University of Freiburg Abstract A comparison theorem is stated for Markov processes in polish state spaces. We consider a general class of
More informationFactoring Cubic Polynomials
Factoring Cubic Polynomials Robert G. Underwood 1. Introduction There are at least two ways in which using the famous Cardano formulas (1545) to factor cubic polynomials present more difficulties than
More informationQUADRATIC RECIPROCITY IN CHARACTERISTIC 2
QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY IN CHARACTERISTIC 2 KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let F be a finite field. When F has odd characteristic, the quadratic reciprocity law in F[T ] (see [4, Section 3.2.2] or [5]) lets
More informationSpectral Networks and Harmonic Maps to Buildings
Spectral Networks and Harmonic Maps to Buildings 3 rd Itzykson Colloquium Fondation Mathématique Jacques Hadamard IHES, Thursday 7 November 2013 C. Simpson, joint work with Ludmil Katzarkov, Alexander
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING 1. Introduction The Black-Scholes theory, which is the main subject of this course and its sequel, is based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, that arbitrages
More informationReal Roots of Univariate Polynomials with Real Coefficients
Real Roots of Univariate Polynomials with Real Coefficients mostly written by Christina Hewitt March 22, 2012 1 Introduction Polynomial equations are used throughout mathematics. When solving polynomials
More informationChapter 5. Banach Spaces
9 Chapter 5 Banach Spaces Many linear equations may be formulated in terms of a suitable linear operator acting on a Banach space. In this chapter, we study Banach spaces and linear operators acting on
More information15 Limit sets. Lyapunov functions
15 Limit sets. Lyapunov functions At this point, considering the solutions to ẋ = f(x), x U R 2, (1) we were most interested in the behavior of solutions when t (sometimes, this is called asymptotic behavior
More information1. Introduction. PROPER HOLOMORPHIC MAPPINGS BETWEEN RIGID POLYNOMIAL DOMAINS IN C n+1
Publ. Mat. 45 (2001), 69 77 PROPER HOLOMORPHIC MAPPINGS BETWEEN RIGID POLYNOMIAL DOMAINS IN C n+1 Bernard Coupet and Nabil Ourimi Abstract We describe the branch locus of proper holomorphic mappings between
More information