# 8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 8 De Rham cohomology Last updated: May 21, Examples, definitions, and basic properties A k-form ω Ω k (M) is closed if dω =. It is exact if there is a (k 1)-form σ Ω k 1 (M) such that dσ = ω. A form σ such that dσ = ω is called a primitive for ω. (Of course, when it exists, it is not unique.) The condition dω = is local, in the sense that a form on M is closed if it is closed near every point of M (in other words, if all the restrictions ω U are closed as forms on U M). To check that dω =, we simply check that in local coordinates. Compared to that, the property of being exact is not a local one. It is necessary that a form σ such that dσ = ω is a form on the whole M, i.e., σ should be everywhere defined. We know that every exact form is closed, since d(dω) =. On the other hand, there are closed but not exact forms. Example 8.1. Consider the 1-form ω = dθ on R 2 \ {} where θ is the polar angle. In standard Cartesian coordinates, as one can check, ω = xdy ydx x 2 + y 2. This form is not exact, because for a cycle going around the origin once, say, counterclockwise, ω = 2π. C (The exact number is not important; that it is non-zero, is important.) Remark 8.1. In the above example, dθ appear as exact (the differential of the function θ), but it is not, because the function θ is bad. It cannot be made everywhere defined, smooth and single-valued function on the whole of R 2 \ {} at the same time. It can be made a genuine function only locally, in a sufficiently small domain, in particular where it is not possible to have a cycle going around the origin. The case of dθ is typical. Every closed form on a manifold can be regarded as exact if we surrender some of the properties: 1

2 allow discontinuities or multi-valuedness, or consider the form only locally. (The last claim is the content of the so-called Poincaré lemma, that every closed form is locally exact, which will be discussed shortly.) Therefore, the difference between closed forms and exact forms is a global feature of the manifold in question and measures its topological complexity. Definition 8.1. A closed k-form is cohomologous to zero if it is exact. Closed k-forms ω and ω on a manifold M are cohomologous if their difference is exact: ω ω = dτ for some (k 1)-form τ. (The form τ should be a well-defined smooth form on the whole M.) This is an equivalence relation. Equivalence classes w.r.t. this relation are called cohomology classes. The set of all cohomology classes of degree k (sometimes people also say: in dimension k), is denoted H k (M). Notation for cohomology classes: [ω] H k (M), if ω Ω k (M) is a closed form representing an element [ω]. (Check that it is indeed an equivalence relation!) Theorem 8.1. For each k =, 1,, 2,..., the set of cohomology classes H k (M) is a vector space over R w.r.t. addition and multiplication by constants defined on representatives. Proof. Consider the sum of two closed forms, ω + σ. It is closed, by the linearity of d. If we replace one of the summands by a cohomologous form, the sum will remain in the same cohomology class: ω + σ = ω + (σ + dτ) = (ω +σ)+dτ. Thus addition of cohomology classes is well-defined and H k (M) inherits the structure of an Abelian group. In a similar way we can show that multiplication by real numbers is well-defined on cohomology classes. Therefore H k (M) is a vector space with respect to the operations [ω 1 ] + [ω 2 ] := [ω 1 + ω 2 ], k[ω] := [kω] defined by the usual addition and multiplication by constants of closed forms representing cohomology classes. Hence, for each k, there is the cohomology space H k (M). In particular, it is an Abelian group and the traditional name for the vector space H k (M) is the kth cohomology group. Remark 8.2. Using the notion of the quotient space V/W of a vector space V w.r.t. a subspace W V, we can say, shortly, that H k (M) = Z k (M)/B k (M) 2

3 where Z k (M) := Ker(d: Ω k (M) Ω k+1 (M)) stands for the space of all closed k-form and B k (M) := d ( Ω k 1 (M) ) stands for the space of all exact k-forms. Remark 8.3. In the definition of cohomology groups we have used forms with real coefficients. Sometimes it is convenient to consider complex-valued functions and forms. The definition of cohomology applies to them as well and to distinguish the two cases, we may use the notation such as H k (M, R) and H k (M, C), which are vector spaces over R and C respectively. The cohomology group H k (M) defined using differential forms is also called the de Rham cohomology group, after the Swiss mathematician George de Rham. The name suggests that there are other cohomology theories, and this is indeed true 1, but for manifolds they all give the same objects. This is exactly the statement of the fundamental de Rham theorem conjectured by Élie Cartan and proved by G. de Rham. Sometimes the notation HDR k (M) is used for de Rham cohomology. Definition 8.2. The dimension dim H k (M) is denoted b k (M) and called, the kth Betti number of M. (One can see that we can use both real-valued or complex-valued forms and this makes no difference for the dimension of cohomology: b k (M) = dim R H k (M, R) = dim C H k (M, C).) As we know, forms can be multiplied and they form a graded algebra Ω (M) = ( Ω k (M) ), which is associative and graded-commutative. Theorem 8.2. The exterior multiplication of forms induces a multiplication of cohomology classes making the vectors spaces H k (M) a graded-commutative algebra. It is denoted H (M) and is called the (de Rham) cohomology algebra of a manifold M. Proof. Consider the product of closed forms: ω σ. The Leibniz rule implies that it is closed: d(ω σ) = dω σ ± ω dσ = + =. If one of the factors 1 We may mention simplicial cohomology defined using a triangulation, singular cohomology based on the notion of singular simplex or, as a variant, singular cube, and Čech cohomology defined using open covers. A feature distinguishing other cohomology constructions from the Cartan de Rham theory is the possibility to use the coefficients more general than the real numbers. For example, using theories such as simplicial or Čech it is possible to introduce certain cohomology groups H k (M, Z) or H k (M, Z 2 ), which may carry more information than the cohomology with real and complex coefficients. 3

4 is replaced by a different representative of the same cohomology class, then the cohomology class of the product will not change: ω σ = (ω + dτ) σ = ω σ+dτ σ = ω σ+d(τ σ), by the same Leibniz rule, since dσ =. Hence, the exterior multiplication of forms induces a well-defined multiplication on cohomology classes: [ω] [σ] := [ω σ]. We arrive at the structure of a graded algebra on the graded vector space H (M) = ( H k (M) ), called the cohomology algebra of M. The cohomology algebra H (M) is associative and graded-commutative, inheriting these properties from the algebra of forms Ω (M). Consider a smooth map F : M N. It induces the pull-back of forms: F : Ω k (N) Ω k (M). Let [ω] H k (N) be a cohomology class represented by a closed form ω Ω k (N). Definition 8.3. The pull-back (or induced map) on cohomology classes is defined by the formula: F ([ω]) := [F (ω)], where at the r.h.s. there is the pull-back of a differential form representing a given cohomology class [ω]. Theorem 8.3. The pull-back of cohomology classes is well-defined. It is a linear map F : H k (N) H k (M), for each k =, 1,.... For the composition of smooth maps, we have (G F ) = F G (1) on cohomology. The pull-back F is an algebra homomorphism of cohomology algebras. Proof. Suppose a form ω Ω k (N) is closed and represents a cohomology class [ω] H k (N). We first need to check that the form F (ω) Ω k (M) is also closed and therefore gives a cohomology class in H k (M). Indeed, df (ω) = F (dω) =. (The key fact here is that the exterior differential commutes with pull-backs of forms.) Next, suppose a representative ω is replaced by ω = ω+dσ. Then F (ω ) = F (ω+dσ) = F (ω)+f (dσ) = F (ω)+df (σ), 4

5 so [F (ω )] = F (ω). Therefore the linear map F : H k (N) H k (M) is welldefined. Equation (1) follows from the same property for the pull-backs of forms. To see that F is an algebra homomorphism on cohomology, we write F ( [ω][σ] ) = F ( [ω σ] ) = [F ( ω σ ) ] = [F ω F σ] = so it is as claimed. [F ω][f σ] = F [ω] F [σ]. Corollary 8.1. If manifolds M and N are diffeomorphic, then the cohomology groups H k (M) and H k (N) are isomorphic (for all k). Proof. Suppose F : M N and G: N M are mutually inverse smooth maps giving a diffeomorphism M = N. Consider the vector spaces H k (M) and H k (N) for some given k. There are linear maps F : H k (N) H k (M) and G : H k (M) H k (N). The identities F G = id and G F = id imply (F G) = G F = id and (G F ) = F G = id. Hence the linear maps F and G are mutually inverse, so the vector spaces H k (M) and H k (N) are isomorphic (in particular, have the same dimension). Remark 8.4. Moreover, if M and N are diffeomorphic, the cohomology algebras H (M) and H (N) are isomorphic. Indeed, we have isomorphism of vector spaces (in each degree) that also preserves the multiplication. Corollary 8.1 means that the de Rham cohomology is a diffeomorphism invariant of a smooth manifold. We shall see shortly that de Rham cohomology is, in fact, an invariant under a much coarser equivalence relation. Namely, it is a homotopy invariant. Proposition 8.1. For any manifold M, the dimension of the space H (M) is the number of connected components of M (if it is finite). 5

6 Proof. The space of -forms is the space of smooth functions C (M). A function f Ω (M) = C (M) is closed if df =. What does it mean? Near each point f must be a constant (indeed, we may introduce coordinates and write df = in coordinates). Hence f is a local constant. It need not be a constant on the whole M (a global constant), which is demonstrated by the example of a manifold consisting of two connected components such as two disjoint copies of R n. The function may be zero on one component and 1, on another. Notice that there no exact -forms (because there are no 1-forms). Therefore H (M) is the space of all local constants on M. It is intuitively clear and can be proved by a simple topological argument that on a connected topological space any local constant is a constant. Therefore, if a topological space, in particular, a manifold M, is the disjoint union of its connected components (maximal connected subspaces), then any local constant is defined by its values of the components (constants); thus it is a function on the set of components. If the number of components is finite, the space of functions on this set is finite-dimensional. As a basis one take functions that are identically 1 on one component and identically on all other components. Hence the dimension is the number of components. In most of our examples, the manifolds in question are connected. Then, automatically, H (M) = R for them. Consider examples of cohomology classes in degrees higher than zero. Example 8.2. We saw above that [dθ] is a non-zero class in H 1 (R 2 \ {}). Example 8.3. If we consider θ as a parameter on the circle S 1 (defined up to 2π), the 1-form dθ is well-defined and gives a non-zero class [dθ] in H 1 (S 1 ). We shall shortly see that all other cohomology classes of the circle in degree 1 are proportional to [dθ], i.e., dim H 1 (S 1 ) = 1 and [dθ] can be taken as a basis (consisting of a single element). 8.2 Homotopy invariance and the Poincaré Lemma Definition 8.4. Two smooth maps f, f 1 : M N are homotopic if there is a smooth map F : M [, 1] N such that F (x, ) = f (x) and F (x, 1) = f 1 (x) for all x M. Notation: f f 1. (In other words, there is a family f t = F (, t) giving smooth interpolation between f and f 1.) The map F is known as a homotopy between f and f 1. 6

7 Of course, homotopy also makes sense just for topological spaces, not manifolds. In such a case instead of smoothness we impose continuity. What we have defined above is known as smooth homotopy, but we shall skip the adjective. Theorem 8.4 (Homotopy invariance). Homotopic maps of smooth manifolds induce the same linear map of their de Rham cohomology. A proof is given below. An immediate application of this property is as follows. Definition 8.5. Two manifolds (more generally, two topological spaces) are homotopy equivalent if there are maps in the opposite directions such that their compositions are homotopic to identities. That is, for X and Y, there are f : X Y and g : Y X such that f g id Y and g f id X. Notation: X Y. A manifold (more generally, topological space) homotopy equivalent to a point is called contractible. Example 8.4 (Contractibility of R n ). Let us show that R n { } (a single point). We can identify the point with R n. Consider the obvious maps i: {} R n (inclusion) and p: R n {} (projection). We have p i = id, but i p is not the identity, it is the map that send every vector to zero. However, it is homotopic to the identity, the family f t : x tx, where t [, 1], giving the desired homotopy. Example 8.5. Open and closed cylinders, S 1 R and S 1 [ 1, 1], are both homotopy equivalent to the circle S 1. (The same is true if we replace S 1 by any space X.) (Construct the maps and homotopies following the previous example.) The previous example shows that homotopy equivalence is much coarser relation than diffeomorphism or homeomorphism: it does not have to preserve dimension (the cylinders are 2-dimensional and S 1 is 1-dimensional) and a non-compact space (such as the open cylinder) may be homotopy equivalent to a compact space (such as the closed cylinder). Corollary 8.2 (from Theorem 8.4). Homotopy equivalent manifolds M and N have isomorphic cohomology groups H k (M) and H k (N) for all k. Proof. Let f : M N and g : N M be such maps that f g id N and g f id M. Then by Theorem 8.4, for each k, we have linear maps of vector 7

8 spaces f : H k (N) H k (M) and g : H k (M) H k (N) with the property f g = id on H k (M) and g f = id on H k (N) ( homotopic to identity becomes equal to identity for the maps of cohomology). That mean that these vector spaces are isomorphic. Example 8.6. All generalized cylinders over a manifold M such as M R, M ( 1, 1), and M [ 1, 1] have the same cohomology as M. For example, H 1 (S 1 ( 1, 1)) = R and H 2 (S 1 ( 1, 1)) =. Applying Corollary 8.2 to the special case of R n domain in R n, see below) we obtain the following. (or any star-shaped Theorem 8.5 ( The Poincaré Lemma ). On R n every closed k-form, k 1, is exact. Or: { H k (R n ) R for k = = for k >. Proof. Indeed, R n is contractible. Therefore, by Corollary 8.2, H k (R n ) = H k ({ }) for all k =, 1, 2,.... The claim follows. Although the Poincaré lemma is the statement about vanishing of certain cohomology, namely, H k (R n ) = for k, it plays a key role in calculating the cohomology for manifolds when it is possibly non-zero. Indeed, since in a neighborhood of a point every manifold M n is undistinguishable from R n or an open ball in R n, the Poincaré lemma immediately implies that there is no local obstruction for a closed form on M n to be exact, but only locally. See the discussion at the beginning of this section. So if there is an open cover of a manifold by contractible domains U α (for example, diffeomorphic to R n ), it is possible to find a local primitive for each closed k-form: i.e., write ω = dσ α for σ α Ω k 1 (U α ). Then the task of finding a global primitive for ω (or an obstruction for that) is reduced to considering the differences σ α σ β on the intersections and whether or not, by a choice of each σ α, these differences can be made zero. We shall see an application of this idea in the next subsection 2. Let us now give a proof of the homotopy invariance of de Rham cohomology. 2 Moreover, although this remains beyond the scope of this course, provided all the pairwise and higher intersections such as U α U β, U α U β U γ, etc., are also contractible, it is possible to reduce the description of the cohomology classes of M n to a purely combinatorial data in terms of the open cover U = (U α ), encoding in this case the topology of M n. 8

9 Proof of Theorem 8.4. Suppose f and f 1 are two homotopic maps M N. Let F : M [, 1] N be a homotopy. We wish to show that the linear maps f : H k (N) H k (M) and f 1 : H k (N) H k (M) coincide for all k. That means that if we take a cohomology class [ω] H k (N) represented by a closed k-form ω Ω k (N), the pull-backs f (ω) and f 1 (ω) not necessarily coincide, but they must differ only by an exact form. To this end, we shall introduce a linear transformation K : Ω k (N) Ω k 1 (M), decreasing degrees, such that for any form ω Ω k (N), f 1 ω f ω = (d K + K d)ω. (2) Thus for closed forms there will be f1 ω f ω = d(kω). We define K, using the homotopy F. Consider F ω Ω k (M [, 1]). Each k-form σ on M [, 1] can be uniquely written as σ = σ () t + dt σ (1) t where σ () t and σ (1) t are forms on M depending on the parameter t. (Use some local coordinates on M to see how it works.) The degree of σ () t is k, while the degree of σ (1) t is k 1. Indeed, the term with σ (1) t contains an extra factor of dt, which raises the degree by 1. We define the operation K by Kω = ( K F )ω, where K sends any σ = σ () t + dt σ (1) t on M [, 1] to 1 dt(σ(1) t ) (integration over t as a parameter). The result is a (k 1)-form. Let us check that K has the desired property (2). Firstly, d F = F d, so we need to calculate the commutator of d and K. On M [, 1], d = d x + dt t where d x can be considered as the differential on M. In local coordinates, d x = dx i. If we apply it to σ Ω k (M [, 1]) written as above, we x i arrive at ( dσ = d x + dt ) ( ) ( ) σ () t + dt σ (1) t = d x σ () t + dt d x σ (1) t + σ() t. t t Hence Kdσ = 1 dt ( d x σ (1) t ) + σ() t = t 1 ( ) dt d x σ (1) t + σ () 1 σ (). 9

10 On the other hand, clearly d Kσ = d 1 dt(σ (1) t ) = 1 ( ) dt d x σ (1) t. Therefore ( d K + K ) d σ = σ () 1 σ (). (3) Now the desired relation (2) follows from Equation (3) applied to σ = F ω. We have, for K = K F, ( (d K + K d) ω = d K F + K ) F d ω = (d K F + K ) ( d F ω = d K + K ) d (F ω) = (F ω) () 1 (F ω) () = f ω f 1 ω. Indeed, when we view F as the family f t = F (, t), we see that ft ω is obtained from F ω by setting dt to zero, i.e., by passing to (F ω) () t in the above notation. Hence f ω and f1 ω are obtained by additionally setting t to and to 1, respectively, which gives the desired formula. Remark 8.5. The method used in the proof above is a prototype of a general construction called algebraic homotopy. More precisely, the algebraic homotopy in the proof is the operator K : Ω k (N) Ω k 1 (M) satisfying the property f1 f = [d, K] (the commutator understood in the sense of graded algebras). We deduced the existence of such an operator K from the existence of a homotopy of smooth maps F = (f t ). From the existence of K immediately follows that the maps given by f and f1 coincide on the level of cohomology. These constructions can be axiomatized and generalized as it is done in the area of mathematics called homological algebra. The Poincaré Lemma is often given a direct proof independent from the homotopy invariance of de Rham cohomology. The underlying idea is very simple and is related with integration of forms. Example 8.7. On the real line R, any 1-form ω = f(x)dx (which is automatically closed), is exact. Indeed, consider the function F (x) = x f(y)dy. It is defined on the whole line R and we have df = ω by the Newton Leibniz theorem (the main theorem of calculus ). 1

11 This can be seen as a prototype of the general statement concerning R n or the so-called star-shaped domains in R n. Let us define them Definition 8.6. An open domain U R n is called star-shaped if there is a point x U such that for each x U, all points of the segment [x x] are in U. (The segment [x x] consists of all points of the form (1 t)x + tx where t [, 1].) The point x is often referred to as the center of the star-shaped domain U. For example, any convex domain (i.e., such that for any two points the segment joining them is also contained in the domain) is star-shaped. However, a starshaped domain does not have to be convex. Example 8.8. An open ball in R n is convex, therefore star-shaped. Example 8.9. The interior of any star in R 2 is star-shaped. (Notice that a star is not convex.) A version of the Poincaré Lemma is as follows. Theorem 8.6 (Poincaré Lemma). On R n or any star-shaped domain in R n, every closed k-form is exact, if k 1. We can give an independent direct proof for 1-forms. (It is in fact generalizes to k-forms as well, but we shall not go into that here.) Direct proof of the Poincaré Lemma for 1-forms. Let A = A i (x)dx i be a closed 1- form on a star-shaped domain U R n. That means that i A j j A i =. Without loss of generality we may assume that the center x of U is the origin R n. For any point x U, the segment [x] consists of points tx where t [, 1]. Define a function f by the formula f(x) = 1 x i A i (tx)dt for all x U. It makes sense because tx U. We have df = dx j 1 1 x j x i A i (tx)dt = dx j ( ) x j x i A i (tx) dt 1 ( ) = dx j δja i i (tx) + x i t j A i (tx) dt } {{ } = i A j (tx) 1 )dt = dx j = dx j 1 ( A j (tx) + tx i i A j (tx) therefore A = df is exact, as claimed. 11 d ( ) ta j (tx) dt dt = dx j ta j (tx) = A, t= t=1

12 Remark 8.6. In the proof for 1-forms above, the function f is nothing but the integral [x x] A over the straight line segment [x x]. A similar proof for k > 1, which we do not give, also uses integration, but in a more sophisticated way (since the integral of a k-form over a k-surface would give a number, but we need to obtain a (k 1)-form). 8.3 Further examples of calculation Consider some examples of calculating cohomology. We know that for any connected manifold M, the space H (M) is onedimensional. Consider the opposite extreme. What can be said of the n-th cohomology of a manifold M n, where dim M n = n? All n-forms on M n are automatically closed. Suppose M n is compact and orientable. It is not difficult to see that in such case on a manifold M n there exists an n-form ω such that for all charts of an oriented atlas, ω = n1! ω 12...n dx 1... dx n where ω 12...n >. (For surfaces in R 3, one can take the area element; similarly, a volume element can be constructed for higher dimensional manifolds, for example, using an embedding into R N.) For the form ω, M n ω > due to the positivity of ω 12...n. Suppose M n is also without boundary. Then, by the Stokes theorem, the integral of any exact form dσ vanishes: dσ = σ = σ =. M n M Therefore the form ω cannot be exact, and we conclude that the space H n (M n ) for an arbitrary closed manifold is non-zero. (Recall that a manifold is called closed if it is compact, orientable and without boundary 3.) In fact, more can be said: Theorem 8.7. For a connected closed manifold M n, the top cohomology space is one-dimensional: H n (M n ) = R. 3 Hopefully the terminology in the context of de Rham cohomology will not confuse the reader. Yes, there are manifolds that are closed and there are differential forms that are closed. What is in common, is that M = for a closed manifold and dω = for a closed form, so the two notions are not so far apart. 12

13 A proof of that is beyond the scope of this course. We can only note that a map H n (M n ) R giving the desired isomorphism is nothing but the integration [ω] for ω Ω n (M n ). M n ω Remark 8.7. The condition for M n to be connected is important. If M n has several connected components, then one can consider integrals over each of them, arriving therefore at several real numbers instead of one. Theorem 8.7 generalizes to the statement that for an arbitrary closed manifold, the vector space H n (M n ) is isomorphic to the dual of the vector space H (M n ) and therefore there is the equality of the Betti numbers: b n (M n ) = b (M n ). More generally, for a closed k-form ω and a closed (n k)-form σ on a closed n-dimensional manifold M n, the map (ω, σ) ω σ R M n defines a linear transformation H k (M n ) ( H n k (M n ) ). (Check that it is well-defined!) A generalization of Theorem 8.7 tells that this linear transformation is an isomorphism, so for an arbitrary closed manifold M n, and therefore H k (M n ) = ( H n k (M n ) ) b k (M n ) = b n k (M n ), for all k =, 1,..., n. This is known as the Poincaré Duality Theorem. Again, its proof is outside our course. Let us now calculate the de Rham cohomology in some simple examples where it can be done by hands (without developing special technique). 13

14 Example 8.1 (Cohomology of the circle S 1 ). Consider S 1 as the unit circle with center at the origin in R 2. We already know that [dθ], where θ is the polar angle, is a non-zero class in H 1 (S 1 ). This is because S 1 dθ. Claim: dim H 1 (S 1 ) = 1 and one can take [dθ] as a basis. To prove it, note that arbitrary 1-forms on the circle can be written as f(θ)θ where f(θ+2π) = f(θ), i.e., as periodic 1-forms on the real line. Any such form is the differential of a function g on R, which is possibly not periodic: f(θ)dθ = dg where g(θ) = θ f(s)ds. It turns out that the condition for g(θ + 2π) = g(θ) is exactly the vanishing of the integral 2π f(s)ds = f(θ)θ. S 1 Therefore a 1-form on S 1 is exact if and only if it has zero integral over S 1. Any 1-form ω Ω 1 (S 1 ) (automatically closed because all 2-forms are zero) is cohomologous to c [dθ] where c = 1 2π S 1 ω. Thus the cohomology classes in H 1 (S 1 ) are in 1-1-correspondence with numbers c R and H 1 (S 1 ) = R. Conclusion: R for k = H k (S 1 ) = R for k = 1 for k > 1. (It is also zero for k <, but we shall always omit such obvious equality.) Example 8.11 (Cohomology of the cylinder S 1 R). A similar direct argument can be applied to the cylinder S 1 R (or a finite open cylinder S 1 ( 1, 1), diffeomorphic to it) to show that H 1 (S 1 R) = R (a representative of a non-zero class is again [dθ] where θ is the angular coordinate on S 1 ) and that H 2 (S 1 R) =. It is also possible to apply a homotopy argument, that S 1 R is homotopy equivalent to S 1, therefore H k (S 1 R) = H k (S 1 ) for all k. 14

15 Example 8.12 (Cohomology of the sphere S 2 ). To find the cohomology of S 2 we may argue in the following way. Consider an open cover of S 2 by two open sets, open neighborhoods of the north and south poles respectively, such that each of them is diffeomorphic to a disk and the intersection is diffeomorphic to a cylinder S 1 ( 1, 1). For example, one can take the coordinate domains for the stereographic atlas, where U = S 2 \ {N} and U 1 = S 2 \ {S}. Then it is possible to compute the cohomology of S 2 by reducing it to the known cohomology of U, U 1 and U 1 = U U 1. Suppose ω Ω 1 (S 2 ) is closed. Consider ω U and ω U1. By the Poincaré lemma, ω U = df and ω U1 = df 1 where f C (U ) and f 1 C (U 1 ), respectively. On the intersection U 1, d(f f 1 ) =, so f f 1 is a constant (since U 1 is connected), say, f f 1 = c R. Consider f 1 := f 1 + c on U 1 ; for it, ω = df 1 still holds, and f and f 1 agree on U 1. Therefore there is a globally defined function f such that f U = f and f U1 = f 1, and ω = df. We can conclude that every closed 1-form on S 2 is exact, i.e., H 1 (S 2 ) =. Consider now ω Ω 2 (S 2 ). It is automatically closed. We know that there are 2-forms whose cohomology classes are non-zero. For example, the area element ds = sin θ dθ dϕ on S 2. We shall show that H 2 (S 2 ) is onedimensional. In a similar way to the above, ω U = dσ and ω U1 = dσ 1 where σ Ω 1 (U ) and σ 1 Ω 1 (U 1 ), respectively. On the intersection, d(σ σ 1 ) =, hence σ 1 := σ σ 1 represents a cohomology class in H 1 (U 1 ). As U 1 is diffeomorphic to the cylinder S 1 ( 1, 1), we know that H 1 (U 1 ) = R. If we choose σ or σ 1 differently, say, take σ = σ +df instead of σ, the cohomology class of σ 1 = σ σ 1 on U 1 will not change. If we replace the original ω by a cohomologous form on S 2, say, take, ω = ω + dσ for some global σ Ω 1 (S 2 ), then for the new form it is possible to take σ = σ + σ and σ 1 = σ 1 + σ, so σ 1 = σ 1. Hence we arrive at a welldefined map H 2 (S 2 ) H 1 (U 1 ). It is linear (check!). It is an isomorphism. Indeed, consider a closed 1-form σ 1 on U 1. Using a partition of unity on S 2 subordinate to the cover (U, U 1 ), g +g 1 = 1, Supp g U and Supp g 1 U 1, we can define σ := g 1 σ 1 as a 1-form on U (by extending by zero from U 1 ) and, similarly, σ 1 := g σ 1 as a 1-form on U 1. Note the minus sign. Then σ σ 1 = g σ 1 ( g 1 σ 1 ) = (g + g 1 )σ 1 = σ 1 on U 1. Applying d, we see that dσ dσ 1 = on U 1. Therefore there is a well-defined 2-form ω on S 2 = U U 1 such that ω U = dσ and ω U = dσ respectively. In this way we have constructed the inverse map for H 2 (S 2 ) H 1 (U 1 ). So it is an 15

16 isomorphism and we conclude that H 2 (S 2 ) = H 1 (U 1 ) = R. To summarize: R for k = H k (S 2 ) = for k = 1 R for k = 2. (It is of course zero also for k < or k > 2.) Example 8.13 (Cohomology of S n for n > 2). The cohomology of S n for n > 2 can be calculated by the same method as for S 2. It is clear that H (S n ) = R because the sphere is connected. By arguing as above, one can see that H 1 (S n ) =. In the same way one can establish an isomorphism H k (S n ) H k 1 (S n 1 ) for all k > 1. Using induction on n, one can arrive at the following answer: R for k = H k (S n ) = for < k < n R for k = n. (Question: what is the cohomology of S?) We shall give more examples without proofs, which would require developing some technical tools. They are not particularly difficult, but we do not have the time. Example 8.14 (Real projective space). The cohomology of RP n is as follows. The answer depends on the parity of n. For the even-dimensional real projective spaces, { H k (RP 2m ) R for k = = for k >. For the odd-dimensional real projective spaces, R for k = H k (RP 2m+1 ) = for < k < 2m + 1 R for k = 2m

17 Here m =, 1, 2,.... (For example, RP 1 = S 1 and H (RP 1 ) = H (S 1 ).) The difference of the two cases (and the whole answer) can be explained by the fact that RP n is obtained from S n by the identification of the antipodal points. So the k-forms on RP n can be naturally considered as the k-forms on the sphere S n invariant under the antipodal map x x. With some more care, one can see that for all k the vector space H k (RP n ) can be identified with a subspace in H k (S n ). The question is therefore about the cohomology in degree n. Here the difference between n = 2m and n = 2m + 1 arises: in the first case the manifold is non-orientable and there is no volume form giving a non-trivial class in H n (RP n ), while in the second case the volume form on S n is invariant, thus giving a volume form for RP n and a non-trivial class in H n (RP n ). Example 8.15 (Complex projective space). The answer is as follows: R for k = R for k = 2 H k (CP n )... = R for k = 2p... R for k = 1 for k = 2p + 1 for k = 2n (recall that dim CP n = 2n). For example, when n = 1, we know that CP 1 = S 2 and the answer above agrees with the results for the sphere. We have a one-dimensional space in all even degrees 2p 2n and zero otherwise. In the previous examples there was no need to consider the multiplicative structure in cohomology (since by dimensional considerations, the multiplication was always zero). Here the algebra structure of H (CP n ) can help to describe the answer better. The following is true. Take a non-zero cohomology class x H 2 (CP n ). (It spans the one-dimensional vector space H 2 (CP n ).) Then all its powers: x, x 2,..., x n (up to the nth power), are nonzero and therefore span the corresponding cohomology spaces H 2p (CP n ). The cohomology algebra of CP n can be described as the truncated polynomial algebra H (CP n ) = R[x]/(x n+1 ), 17

18 i.e., the factor-algebra of the algebra of polynomials R[x] w.r.t. the relation x n+1 =. There is a nice choice of a basis class x H 2 (CP n ) given by a certain closed 2-form ω Ω 2 (CP n ). (We skip the formula for ω in coordinates.) In particular, this form satisfies ω = 1 (S 2, i) for a natural embedding i of S 2 = CP 1 into CP n. (When n grows, the relation x n+1 = in the algebra H (CP n ) goes away to infinity. The limit CP makes sense, which is called infinite complex projective space. It is not a finite-dimensional manifold, but cohomology still makes sense. For it, the cohomology algebra is just the algebra of polynomials: H (CP ) = R[x].) Example 8.16 (the n-torus). By definition, T n is the product S 1... S 1. Denote the angular coordinate on each circle as θ i, where i = 1... n. The 1- forms dθ i are obviously closed and define the non-trivial cohomology classes y i = [dθ i ] H 1 (T n ). (Indeed, the forms dθ i give non-zero integrals over the corresponding embedded circles.) They can be multiplied and we have y i y j = y j y i (as represented by the wedge product of 1-forms, dθ i dθ j = dθ j dθ i ). The statement is that there are no other relations between the products of the classes y i and that the products y i1... y ik with i 1 <... < i k span the cohomology spaces H k (T n ). So the Betti numbers are given by the binomial coefficients: b k (T n ) = Cn k n! = k!(n k)!, and the cohomology algebra H (T n ) can be described as the exterior algebra on n generators y 1,..., y n. In particular, for the 2-torus we have R for k = H k (T 2 ) = R 2 for k = 1 R for k = 2, with [dθ 1 ], [dθ 2 ] giving a basis of H 1 (T 2 ), and [dθ 1 dθ 2 ], the basis of H 2 (T 2 ). 18

### Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9

Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9 Hoshang Heydari Fysikum April 25, 2012 Hoshang Heydari (Fysikum) Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9 April 25, 2012 1 / 42 Table of contents 1 Differentiable manifolds 2 Differential

### Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

### 1 Local Brouwer degree

1 Local Brouwer degree Let D R n be an open set and f : S R n be continuous, D S and c R n. Suppose that the set f 1 (c) D is compact. (1) Then the local Brouwer degree of f at c in the set D is defined.

### Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................

### DIVISORS AND LINE BUNDLES

DIVISORS AND LINE BUNDLES TONY PERKINS 1. Cartier divisors An analytic hypersurface of M is a subset V M such that for each point x V there exists an open set U x M containing x and a holomorphic function

### LINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN

LINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1997, 2008 This chapter is available free to all individuals, on understanding that it is not to be used for financial gain, and may be downloaded and/or photocopied,

### Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces

Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1988 2008 Contents 1 Topological Spaces 1 1.1 Continuity and Topological Spaces...............

### CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY

CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY Topology, sometimes referred to as the mathematics of continuity, or rubber sheet geometry, or the theory of abstract topological spaces, is all of these, but, above all, it is

### The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if

### TOPOLOGY OF SINGULAR FIBERS OF GENERIC MAPS

TOPOLOGY OF SINGULAR FIBERS OF GENERIC MAPS OSAMU SAEKI Dedicated to Professor Yukio Matsumoto on the occasion of his 60th birthday Abstract. We classify singular fibers of C stable maps of orientable

### POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS

POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS RUSS WOODROOFE 1. Unique Factorization Domains Throughout the following, we think of R as sitting inside R[x] as the constant polynomials (of degree 0).

### FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Cosets and the Quotient Space Any vector space is an abelian group under the operation of vector addition. So, if you are have studied

### Math 225A, Differential Topology: Homework 3

Math 225A, Differential Topology: Homework 3 Ian Coley October 17, 2013 Problem 1.4.7. Suppose that y is a regular value of f : X Y, where X is compact and dim X = dim Y. Show that f 1 (y) is a finite

### MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOCHNER-MARTINELLI INTEGRAL

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOCHNER-MARTINELLI INTEGRAL NIKOLAI TARKHANOV AND NIKOLAI VASILEVSKI

### Section 1.1. Introduction to R n

The Calculus of Functions of Several Variables Section. Introduction to R n Calculus is the study of functional relationships and how related quantities change with each other. In your first exposure to

### 88 CHAPTER 2. VECTOR FUNCTIONS. . First, we need to compute T (s). a By definition, r (s) T (s) = 1 a sin s a. sin s a, cos s a

88 CHAPTER. VECTOR FUNCTIONS.4 Curvature.4.1 Definitions and Examples The notion of curvature measures how sharply a curve bends. We would expect the curvature to be 0 for a straight line, to be very small

### LECTURE 1: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. 1. 1-forms on R n

LECTURE 1: DIFFERENTIAL FORMS 1. 1-forms on R n In calculus, you may have seen the differential or exterior derivative df of a function f(x, y, z) defined to be df = f f f dx + dy + x y z dz. The expression

### The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992), 33 37) Bart de Smit

The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free Bart de Smit The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992),

### Classification of Bundles

CHAPTER 2 Classification of Bundles In this chapter we prove Steenrod s classification theorem of principal G - bundles, and the corresponding classification theorem of vector bundles. This theorem states

### Review: Vector space

Math 2F Linear Algebra Lecture 13 1 Basis and dimensions Slide 1 Review: Subspace of a vector space. (Sec. 4.1) Linear combinations, l.d., l.i. vectors. (Sec. 4.3) Dimension and Base of a vector space.

### Surface bundles over S 1, the Thurston norm, and the Whitehead link

Surface bundles over S 1, the Thurston norm, and the Whitehead link Michael Landry August 16, 2014 The Thurston norm is a powerful tool for studying the ways a 3-manifold can fiber over the circle. In

### FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS

FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS Robert F. Brown Department of Mathematics University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095 e-mail: rfb@math.ucla.edu Christina L. Soderlund Department of Mathematics

### Analytic cohomology groups in top degrees of Zariski open sets in P n

Analytic cohomology groups in top degrees of Zariski open sets in P n Gabriel Chiriacescu, Mihnea Colţoiu, Cezar Joiţa Dedicated to Professor Cabiria Andreian Cazacu on her 80 th birthday 1 Introduction

### PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY. b3 course 2003. Nigel Hitchin

PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY b3 course 2003 Nigel Hitchin hitchin@maths.ox.ac.uk 1 1 Introduction This is a course on projective geometry. Probably your idea of geometry in the past has been based on triangles

### MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0-534-40596-7. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column

### WHICH LINEAR-FRACTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS INDUCE ROTATIONS OF THE SPHERE?

WHICH LINEAR-FRACTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS INDUCE ROTATIONS OF THE SPHERE? JOEL H. SHAPIRO Abstract. These notes supplement the discussion of linear fractional mappings presented in a beginning graduate course

### RIGIDITY OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPS BETWEEN FIBER SPACES

RIGIDITY OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPS BETWEEN FIBER SPACES GAUTAM BHARALI AND INDRANIL BISWAS Abstract. In the study of holomorphic maps, the term rigidity refers to certain types of results that give us very specific

### ORIENTATIONS. Contents

ORIENTATIONS Contents 1. Generators for H n R n, R n p 1 1. Generators for H n R n, R n p We ended last time by constructing explicit generators for H n D n, S n 1 by using an explicit n-simplex which

### THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear

### Math 231b Lecture 35. G. Quick

Math 231b Lecture 35 G. Quick 35. Lecture 35: Sphere bundles and the Adams conjecture 35.1. Sphere bundles. Let X be a connected finite cell complex. We saw that the J-homomorphism could be defined by

### Linear Maps. Isaiah Lankham, Bruno Nachtergaele, Anne Schilling (February 5, 2007)

MAT067 University of California, Davis Winter 2007 Linear Maps Isaiah Lankham, Bruno Nachtergaele, Anne Schilling (February 5, 2007) As we have discussed in the lecture on What is Linear Algebra? one of

### 4. Expanding dynamical systems

4.1. Metric definition. 4. Expanding dynamical systems Definition 4.1. Let X be a compact metric space. A map f : X X is said to be expanding if there exist ɛ > 0 and L > 1 such that d(f(x), f(y)) Ld(x,

### 5. Linear algebra I: dimension

5. Linear algebra I: dimension 5.1 Some simple results 5.2 Bases and dimension 5.3 Homomorphisms and dimension 1. Some simple results Several observations should be made. Once stated explicitly, the proofs

### The Math Circle, Spring 2004

The Math Circle, Spring 2004 (Talks by Gordon Ritter) What is Non-Euclidean Geometry? Most geometries on the plane R 2 are non-euclidean. Let s denote arc length. Then Euclidean geometry arises from the

### Linear Span and Bases

MAT067 University of California, Davis Winter 2007 Linear Span and Bases Isaiah Lankham, Bruno Nachtergaele, Anne Schilling (January 23, 2007) Intuition probably tells you that the plane R 2 is of dimension

### Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory

Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory Peter Woit Columbia University Texas Tech, November 21 2013 Peter Woit (Columbia University) Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory November 2013 1 / 30

### I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called

### Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces

Communications in Mathematical Physics Manuscript-Nr. (will be inserted by hand later) Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces Stefan Bechtluft-Sachs, Marco Hien Naturwissenschaftliche

### Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds

359 399 359 arxiv version: fonts, pagination and layout may vary from GT published version Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds OSAMU SAEKI TAKAHIRO YAMAMOTO We show that for a

### Finite dimensional topological vector spaces

Chapter 3 Finite dimensional topological vector spaces 3.1 Finite dimensional Hausdorff t.v.s. Let X be a vector space over the field K of real or complex numbers. We know from linear algebra that the

### 1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics

1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics 1.1 Basic notions of operator algebra. In the previous lectures we have met operators: ˆx and ˆp = i h they are called fundamental operators. Many operators

### 1 Sets and Set Notation.

LINEAR ALGEBRA MATH 27.6 SPRING 23 (COHEN) LECTURE NOTES Sets and Set Notation. Definition (Naive Definition of a Set). A set is any collection of objects, called the elements of that set. We will most

### 9 More on differentiation

Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 75 9 More on differentiation 9a Finite Taylor expansion............... 75 9b Continuous and nowhere differentiable..... 78 9c Differentiable and nowhere monotone......

### Survey and remarks on Viro s definition of Khovanov homology

RIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu B39 (203), 009 09 Survey and remarks on Viro s definition of Khovanov homology By Noboru Ito Abstract This paper reviews and offers remarks upon Viro s definition of the Khovanov

### CLOSED AND EXACT DIFFERENTIAL FORMS IN R n

CLOSED AND EXACT DIFFERENTIAL FORMS IN R n PATRICIA R. CIRILO, JOSÉ REGIS A.V. FILHO, SHARON M. LUTZ paty@ufmg.br, j019225@dac.unicamp.br, sharon.lutz@colorado.edu Abstract. We show in this paper that

### FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Discrete valuation rings: Dimension 1 Noetherian regular local rings 1 Last day, we discussed the Zariski tangent space, and saw that it

### THE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE

THE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE KEITH CONRAD This handout is a supplementary discussion leading up to the definition of dimension and some of its basic properties. Let V be a vector space over a field

### MA106 Linear Algebra lecture notes

MA106 Linear Algebra lecture notes Lecturers: Martin Bright and Daan Krammer Warwick, January 2011 Contents 1 Number systems and fields 3 1.1 Axioms for number systems......................... 3 2 Vector

### Extrinsic geometric flows

On joint work with Vladimir Rovenski from Haifa Paweł Walczak Uniwersytet Łódzki CRM, Bellaterra, July 16, 2010 Setting Throughout this talk: (M, F, g 0 ) is a (compact, complete, any) foliated, Riemannian

### MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 16: Basis and dimension.

MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 16: Basis and dimension. Basis Definition. Let V be a vector space. A linearly independent spanning set for V is called a basis. Equivalently, a subset S V is a basis for

### 1 Norms and Vector Spaces

008.10.07.01 1 Norms and Vector Spaces Suppose we have a complex vector space V. A norm is a function f : V R which satisfies (i) f(x) 0 for all x V (ii) f(x + y) f(x) + f(y) for all x,y V (iii) f(λx)

### NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS

NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS Definition 1. Let V and W be vector spaces. A function T : V W is a linear transformation from V to W if the following two properties hold. i T v + v = T v + T v for all

### Lecture 3. Mathematical Induction

Lecture 3 Mathematical Induction Induction is a fundamental reasoning process in which general conclusion is based on particular cases It contrasts with deduction, the reasoning process in which conclusion

### POWER SETS AND RELATIONS

POWER SETS AND RELATIONS L. MARIZZA A. BAILEY 1. The Power Set Now that we have defined sets as best we can, we can consider a sets of sets. If we were to assume nothing, except the existence of the empty

### Ultraproducts and Applications I

Ultraproducts and Applications I Brent Cody Virginia Commonwealth University September 2, 2013 Outline Background of the Hyperreals Filters and Ultrafilters Construction of the Hyperreals The Transfer

### it is easy to see that α = a

21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore

### 6. Metric spaces. In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. d : X X [0, )

6. Metric spaces In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. Definitions. A metric on a non-empty set X is a map with the following properties: d : X X [0, ) (i) If x, y X are points

### Generic Polynomials of Degree Three

Generic Polynomials of Degree Three Benjamin C. Wallace April 2012 1 Introduction In the nineteenth century, the mathematician Évariste Galois discovered an elegant solution to the fundamental problem

### CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY

January 10, 2010 CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY The set of polynomials over a field F is a ring, whose structure shares with the ring of integers many characteristics.

### State of Stress at Point

State of Stress at Point Einstein Notation The basic idea of Einstein notation is that a covector and a vector can form a scalar: This is typically written as an explicit sum: According to this convention,

### NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY. M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete. Autumn of 2004

NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Autumn of 2004 2 Contents 1 σ-algebras 7 1.1 σ-algebras............................... 7 1.2 Generated σ-algebras.........................

### 7. Some irreducible polynomials

7. Some irreducible polynomials 7.1 Irreducibles over a finite field 7.2 Worked examples Linear factors x α of a polynomial P (x) with coefficients in a field k correspond precisely to roots α k [1] of

### 1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES

1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES What is a vector? Many are familiar with the concept of a vector as: Something which has magnitude and direction. an ordered pair or triple. a description for quantities such

### Witten Deformations. Quinton Westrich University of Wisconsin-Madison. October 29, 2013

Witten Deformations Quinton Westrich University of Wisconsin-Madison October 29, 2013 Abstract These are notes on Witten s 1982 paper Supersymmetry and Morse Theory, in which Witten introduced a deformation

### Chapter 2. Parameterized Curves in R 3

Chapter 2. Parameterized Curves in R 3 Def. A smooth curve in R 3 is a smooth map σ : (a, b) R 3. For each t (a, b), σ(t) R 3. As t increases from a to b, σ(t) traces out a curve in R 3. In terms of components,

### Determinants, Areas and Volumes

Determinants, Areas and Volumes Theodore Voronov Part 2 Areas and Volumes The area of a two-dimensional object such as a region of the plane and the volume of a three-dimensional object such as a solid

### BANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW

BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but

### Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus

Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus n-dimensional Euclidean Space and Matrices Definition of n space As was learned in Math b, a point in Euclidean three space can be thought of

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence

### SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576

SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576 SOLUTIONS BY OLIVIER MARTIN 13 #5. Let T be the topology generated by A on X. We want to show T = J B J where B is the set of all topologies J on X with A J. This amounts

### ANAGRAMS: Dimension of triangulated categories

ANAGRAMS: Dimension of triangulated categories Julia Ramos González February 7, 2014 Abstract These notes were prepared for the first session of "Dimension functions" of ANAGRAMS seminar. The goal is to

### GROUPS ACTING ON A SET

GROUPS ACTING ON A SET MATH 435 SPRING 2012 NOTES FROM FEBRUARY 27TH, 2012 1. Left group actions Definition 1.1. Suppose that G is a group and S is a set. A left (group) action of G on S is a rule for

### Chapter 5 Polar Coordinates; Vectors 5.1 Polar coordinates 1. Pole and polar axis

Chapter 5 Polar Coordinates; Vectors 5.1 Polar coordinates 1. Pole and polar axis 2. Polar coordinates A point P in a polar coordinate system is represented by an ordered pair of numbers (r, θ). If r >

### Table of Contents. Introduction... 1 Chapter 1. Vector Bundles... 4. Chapter 2. K Theory... 38. Chapter 3. Characteristic Classes...

Table of Contents Introduction.............................. 1 Chapter 1. Vector Bundles.................... 4 1.1. Basic Definitions and Constructions............ 6 Sections 7. Direct Sums 9. Inner Products

### The Tangent Bundle. Jimmie Lawson Department of Mathematics Louisiana State University. Spring, 2006

The Tangent Bundle Jimmie Lawson Department of Mathematics Louisiana State University Spring, 2006 1 The Tangent Bundle on R n The tangent bundle gives a manifold structure to the set of tangent vectors

### COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS

COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS IGOR V. EROVENKO AND B. SURY ABSTRACT. We compute commutativity degrees of wreath products A B of finite abelian groups A and B. When B

### 3. INNER PRODUCT SPACES

. INNER PRODUCT SPACES.. Definition So far we have studied abstract vector spaces. These are a generalisation of the geometric spaces R and R. But these have more structure than just that of a vector space.

### RANDOM INTERVAL HOMEOMORPHISMS. MICHA L MISIUREWICZ Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis

RANDOM INTERVAL HOMEOMORPHISMS MICHA L MISIUREWICZ Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis This is a joint work with Lluís Alsedà Motivation: A talk by Yulij Ilyashenko. Two interval maps, applied

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics

Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some

### some algebra prelim solutions

some algebra prelim solutions David Morawski August 19, 2012 Problem (Spring 2008, #5). Show that f(x) = x p x + a is irreducible over F p whenever a F p is not zero. Proof. First, note that f(x) has no

### Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

### On the existence of G-equivariant maps

CADERNOS DE MATEMÁTICA 12, 69 76 May (2011) ARTIGO NÚMERO SMA# 345 On the existence of G-equivariant maps Denise de Mattos * Departamento de Matemática, Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação,

### Effective homotopy of the fiber of a Kan fibration

Effective homotopy of the fiber of a Kan fibration Ana Romero and Francis Sergeraert 1 Introduction Inspired by the fundamental ideas of the effective homology method (see [5] and [4]), which makes it

### Introduction to finite fields

Introduction to finite fields Topics in Finite Fields (Fall 2013) Rutgers University Swastik Kopparty Last modified: Monday 16 th September, 2013 Welcome to the course on finite fields! This is aimed at

### Section 4.4 Inner Product Spaces

Section 4.4 Inner Product Spaces In our discussion of vector spaces the specific nature of F as a field, other than the fact that it is a field, has played virtually no role. In this section we no longer

### The cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics

The cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics Iordan Ganev December 2011 Abstract The subgroup U of unit quaternions is isomorphic to SU(2) and is a double cover of SO(3). This allows a simple computation of

### A homotopy-theoretic view of Bott Taubes integrals

Stanford University November 8, 2009 Intro We will construct cohomology classes in spaces of knots K where K = Emb(S 1, R n ) or Emb(R, R n ) (n 3). Connected components of K correspond to isotopy classes

### 3. Some commutative algebra Definition 3.1. Let R be a ring. We say that R is graded, if there is a direct sum decomposition, M n, R n,

3. Some commutative algebra Definition 3.1. Let be a ring. We say that is graded, if there is a direct sum decomposition, = n N n, where each n is an additive subgroup of, such that d e d+e. The elements

### Definition 12 An alternating bilinear form on a vector space V is a map B : V V F such that

4 Exterior algebra 4.1 Lines and 2-vectors The time has come now to develop some new linear algebra in order to handle the space of lines in a projective space P (V ). In the projective plane we have seen

### (2) the identity map id : S 1 S 1 to the symmetry S 1 S 1 : x x (here x is considered a complex number because the circle S 1 is {x C : x = 1}),

Chapter VI Fundamental Group 29. Homotopy 29 1. Continuous Deformations of Maps 29.A. Is it possible to deform continuously: (1) the identity map id : R 2 R 2 to the constant map R 2 R 2 : x 0, (2) the

### We call this set an n-dimensional parallelogram (with one vertex 0). We also refer to the vectors x 1,..., x n as the edges of P.

Volumes of parallelograms 1 Chapter 8 Volumes of parallelograms In the present short chapter we are going to discuss the elementary geometrical objects which we call parallelograms. These are going to

### Universitat de Barcelona

Universitat de Barcelona GRAU DE MATEMÀTIQUES Final year project Cohomology of Product Spaces from a Categorical Viewpoint Álvaro Torras supervised by Prof. Carles Casacuberta January 18, 2016 2 3 Introduction

### α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

Orthogonal Projection Given any nonzero vector v, it is possible to decompose an arbitrary vector u into a component that points in the direction of v and one that points in a direction orthogonal to v

### 1 = (a 0 + b 0 α) 2 + + (a m 1 + b m 1 α) 2. for certain elements a 0,..., a m 1, b 0,..., b m 1 of F. Multiplying out, we obtain

Notes on real-closed fields These notes develop the algebraic background needed to understand the model theory of real-closed fields. To understand these notes, a standard graduate course in algebra is

### 9 Multiplication of Vectors: The Scalar or Dot Product

Arkansas Tech University MATH 934: Calculus III Dr. Marcel B Finan 9 Multiplication of Vectors: The Scalar or Dot Product Up to this point we have defined what vectors are and discussed basic notation

### Sets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.

Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.

### Algebraic K-Theory of Ring Spectra (Lecture 19)

Algebraic K-Theory of ing Spectra (Lecture 19) October 17, 2014 Let be an associative ring spectrum (here by associative we mean A or associative up to coherent homotopy; homotopy associativity is not

### Linear Algebra. A vector space (over R) is an ordered quadruple. such that V is a set; 0 V ; and the following eight axioms hold:

Linear Algebra A vector space (over R) is an ordered quadruple (V, 0, α, µ) such that V is a set; 0 V ; and the following eight axioms hold: α : V V V and µ : R V V ; (i) α(α(u, v), w) = α(u, α(v, w)),