# MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

 To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms."

## Transcription

1 MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples in Topology by Lynn A. Steen and J. Arthur Seebach, Jr. Topology by James Dugundgji I have intentionally made several mistakes in this text. The first homework assignment is to find them. 6 Separation Axioms. So far, our only requirements for a topology has been that it satisfy the axioms. From now on, we will impose increasingly more severe additional conditions on it. With each new condition, we will determine the invariance properties of the resulting topology: by this we mean: Whether the topology is invariant under open or closed maps rather than only homeomorphisms. Whether the additional properties are inherited by each subspace topology. Whether the additional properties are transmitted to cartesian products. In this lecture we will require of a topology that it separate varying types of subsets. The separation axioms T i stipulate the degree to which distinct points or closed sets may be separated by open sets. These axioms are statements about the richness of topology. They answer questions like, Are there enough open sets to tell points apart? and Are there enough open sets to tell points from closed sets?. Definition 6.1. (T i axioms). Let (X, T ) be a topological space. 1

2 T 0 axiom : If a, b are two distinct elements in X, there exists an open set U T such that either a U and b U, or b U and a U (i.e. U containing exactly one of these points). T 1 axiom : If a, b X and a b, there exist open sets U a, U b T containing a, b respectively, such that b U a, and a U b. T 2 axiom : If a, b X, a b, there exist disjoint open sets U a, U b T containing a, b respectively. T axiom : If A is a closed set and b is a point in X such that b A, there exist disjoint open sets U A, U b T containing A and b respectively. T 4 axiom : If A and B are disjoint closed sets in X, there exist disjoint open sets U A, U B containing A and B respectively. T T 5 axiom : If A and B are separated sets in X, there exist disjoint open sets U A, U B T containing A and B respectively. If (X, T ) satisfies a T i axiom, X is called a T i space. A T 0 space is sometimes called a Kolmogorov space and a T 1 space, a Fréchet space. A T 2 is called a Hausdorff space. Each of axioms in Definition (6.1) is independent of the axioms for a topological space; in fact there exist examples of topological spaces which fail to satisfy any T i. But they are not independent of each other, for instance, axiom T 2 implies axiom T 1, and axiom T 1 implies T 0. More importantly than the separation axioms themselves is the fact that they can be employed to define successively stronger properties. To this end, we note that if a space is both T and T 0 it is T 2, while a space that is both T 4 and T 1 must be T. The former spaces are called regular, and the later normal. Specifically a space X is said to be regular if and only if it is both a T 0 and a T space; to be normal if and only if it is both a T 1 and T 4 space; to be completely normal if and only if it is both a T 1 and a T 5 space. Then we have the following implications: Completely normal Normal Regular Hausdorff T 1 T 0 The use of terms regular and normal is not uniform throughout the literature. While some authors use these terms interchangeably with T space and T 4 space respectively, others (especially in Russian textbooks) refer to our T space as a regular space and vice versa, and similarly permute T 4 space and normal. This allows the successively stronger properties to correspond to increasing T i axioms. Example 6.1. An antidiscrete space X containing more than one point does not satisfy to axiom T 0. 2

3 Example 6.2. Sierpinski space, X = {0, 1} and T = {Ø, {0}, {0, 1}}, satisfies the axiom T 0, but does not satisfy T 1 : there does not exist an open set U containing the point 1 and not containing the point 0. Example 6.. This example is important for algebraic geometry. Let A be a commutative ring (i.e. A has two binary operations, such that addition makes A a commutative group (i.e. a set with a binary associative and commutative operation such that the operation admits an identity element and each element of the set has an inverse element for the operation.) and multiplication is associative and distributes over addition and the commutative law also holds for multiplication (a b = b a.) with a unit and X the set of all prime ideals of A (i.e. such ideals which have the following two properties: whenever a, b are two elements of A such that their product a b lies in the prime ideal P, then a is in P or b is in P, and at the same time P is not equal to the whole ring A). For any a A, let X a denote the set of all prime ideals in A which do not contain a. It is clear that X a X b = X ab for all a, b X, X 0 = Ø and X 1 = X. Consequently, the collection B = {X a a A} is a base of a topology T on A. This topology is called the spectral or Zariski topology. The topological space (X, T ) is called the prime spectrum of the ring A and is denoted Spect(A). The closure of a one point set {x} in Spec(A) consists of all prime ideals y X =Spec(A) containing x. It follows that the space (X, T ) satisfies the separation axiom T 0, but not T 1, since the only closed points in X are the maximal ideals of the ring A. Example 6.4. Let X be an infinite set and let the topology T consist of the empty set and all subsets of X whose complements are finite. Any two nonempty open sets in this set intersect. At the same time all one point sets in (X, T ) are closed. Hence the space (X, T ) satisfies axiom T 1 but nit axiom T 2. 7 Hausdorff Spaces. Theorem 7.1. Let (X, T ) be a topological space. Then the following statements are equivalent: 1. (T 2 axiom). Any two distinct points of X have disjoint neighborhoods. 2. The intersection of the closed neighborhoods of any point of X consists of that point alone.. The diagonal of the product space X X is a closed set. 4. For every set I, the diagonal of the product space Y + X I is closed in Y. 5. No filter on X has more than one limit point. 6. If a filter F on X converges to x, then x is the only cluster point of F.

4 Proof. We will proof the implications: (1) (2) (6) (5) (1) (1) (4) () (1) (1) (2) : If x y there is an open neighborhood U of x and an open neighborhood V of y such that U V = Ø; hence y Ū. (2) (6) : Let x y; then there is a closed neighborhood V of x such that y V, and by hypothesis there exists M F such that M V ; thus M CV = Ø. But CV is a neighborhood of y; hence y is not a cluster point of F. (6) (5) : Clear, since every limit point of a filter is also a cluster point. (5) (1) : Suppose x y and that every neighborhood V of x meets every neighborhood W of y. Then the sets V W form a basis of a filter which has both x and y as limits points, which is contrary to hypothesis. (1) (4) : Let (x) = (x i ) be a point of X I which does not belong to the diagonal. Then there are at least two indices λ, µ such that x λ x µ. Let V λ (respectively V µ ) be a neighborhood of x λ (respectively x µ ) in X, such that V λ V µ = Ø; then the set W = V λ V µ (where X i = X if i λ, µ) is a neighborhood of x in X I which does not meet. Hence is closed in X I. (4) () : Obvious. () (1) : If x y then (x, y) X X is not in the diagonal, hence there is a neighborhood V of x and a neighborhood W of y in X such that (V W ) = Ø, which means that V W = Ø. i λ,µ X i Let f : X Y be a mapping of a set X into a Hausdorff space Y ; then it follows immediately from Theorem (7.1) that f has at most one limit with respect to a filter F on X, and that if f has y as a limit with respect to F, then y is the only cluster point of f with respect to F. Proposition 7.1. let f, g be two continuous mappings of a topological space X into a Hausdorff space Y ; then the set of all x X such that f(x) = g(x) is closed in X. Proof is left as a homework. Corollary 7.1. (Principle of extension of identities). Let f, g be two continuous mappings of a topological space X into a Hausdorff space Y. If f(x) = g(x) at all points of a dense subset of X, then f = g. 4

5 In other words, a continuous map of X into Y (Hausdorff) is uniquely determined by its values at all points of a dense subset of X. Corollary 7.2. If f is a continuous mapping of a topological space X into a Hausdorff space Y, then the graph of f is closed in X Y For this graph is the set of all (x, y) X Y such that f(x) = y, and the two mappings (x, y) y and (x, y) f(x) are continuous. The invariance properties of Hausdorff topologies are: Theorem Hausdorff topologies are invariant under closed bijections. 2. Each subspace of a Hausdorff space is also a Hausdorff space.. The cartesian product {X α α A } is Hausdorff if and only if each X α is Hausdorff. Proof. 1. Since a closed bijection is also an open map, the images of disjoint neighborhoods are disjoint neighborhoods, and the result follows. 2. Let A X and p, q A; since there are disjoint neighborhoods U(p), U(q) in X, the neighborhoods U(p) A and U(q) A in A are also disjoint.. Assume that each X α is Hausdorff and that {p α } {q α }; then p α q α for some α, so choosing the disjoint neighborhoods U(p α ), U(q α ) gives the required disjoint neighborhoods U(p α ), U(q α ) in X α. Conversely, if X α is Hausdorff, then each X α is homeomorphic α α to some slice in α X α, so by (2) (since the Hausdorff property is a topological invariant), X α is Hausdorff. Proposition 7.2. If every point of a topological space X has a closed neighborhood which is a Hausdorff subspace of X, then X is Hausdorff. Proof is left as a homework. 5

6 8 Regular Spaces. The Hausdorff separation axiom (Theorem (7.1)) was introduced to insure uniqueness of limits (and, in fact, is equivalent to it). Certain problems, however, require stronger separation axioms if one to have any hope of success. The problem of existence of continuous extension is typical of this. Suppose A is a subspace of X, and f is continuous on A to Y. Can f be extended continuously to some g : X Y? This is among the most difficult and interesting problems in topology. In general, the answer is no, even when the spaces are Hausdorff ( for example, X = R with Euclidean topology, A = {x x < 0} and f(x) = 1/x for x A. However, with a slightly stronger separation axiom on Y, reasonable conditions assuring a positive solution is possible. This result is Theorem (8.1), and may be thought as the motivation for considering the regularity. Proposition 8.1. The following properties of a topological space X are equivalent: Proof. 1 The set of closed neighborhoods of any point of X is a fundamental system of neighborhoods of the point. 2 (T axiom). Given any closed subset F of X and any point x F there is a neighborhood of x and a neighborhood of F which do not intersect. 1 2 : If F is closed and x F, then there is a closed neighborhood V of x contained in the neighborhood CF of x; V and CV are neighborhoods of x and F respectively, and have no point in common. 2 1 : If W is an open neighborhood of x X, then there is a neighborhood U of x and a neighborhood V of CW which are disjoint, and therefore Ū W. Definition 8.1. A topological space is said to be regular if it is Hausdorff and satisfies axiom T ; its topology is then said to be regular. Remarks: 1 We can say than that the space is T 0 instead of Hausdorff in Definition (8.1). 2 A regular space is distinguished by its ability to separate closed sets from points. This is stronger than the T 2 separation axiom, and on the face seems to imply T 2 axiom by choosing A = {y}, where y x. This reasoning is correct if singletons are always closed in X, but 6

7 this not need to be the case. However, in spaces where {y} is closed for each point y, then of course only T is needed in the definition of regularity. The reason of including T 2 (or T 0 ) in definition (8.1) are to insure the uniqueness of limits. Example 8.1. E n, and, more generally, any metric space is regular. Example 8.2. Discrete spaces are regular. Example 8.. A Hausdorff space need not be regular. Let R be the set of real numbers, T the usual Euclidean topology on R, Q the set of rationals, and T the topology on R generated by Q and the sets in T. Then T T, so (R, T ) is a Hausdorff space. But (R, T ) is not regular. Note that the T -open sets are Q (Q intersect T -open sets) and (T -open sets) (Q intersect T -open sets). Choose any rational number, say 0. Then, 0 R Q. If (R, T ) were regular, there would be disjoint T -open U and V with R Q U and 0 V. Now, for some T -open A and B, U = A (Q B). And since each T -open set intersects R Q, then for some T -open C, V = Q C. Let ε > 0 such that Q ] ε, ε[ Q C. Choose an irrational number ξ ] ε, ε[. Then, ξ R Q A T. Since A is T -open, there is some δ > 0 with ]ξ δ, ξ + δ[ ] ε, ε[ A. Choose a rational number r in ]ε δ, ε + δ[. Then, r A U, and also r Q ] ε, ε[ V. Then, U V Ø, a contradiction. Proposition 8.2. Every subspace of a regular space is regular. Proof. Let A be a subspace of a regular space X. Since X is Hausdorff so is A; on the other hand, every neighborhood of a point x A with respect to A is of the form V A, where V is a neighborhood of x in X. Since X is regular there is a neighborhood W of x in X which is closed in X and contained in V ; W A is then a neighborhood of x in A, closed in A and contained in V A. Hence the result. The converse statement is also true: Proposition 8.. If every point x of a topological space X has a closed neighborhood which is a regular subspace of X, then X is regular. Proof is left as a homework. Theorem 8.1. Let X be a topological space, A a dense subset of X, f : A Y a mapping of A into a regular space Y. A necessary and sufficient condition for f to extend to a continuous mapping f : X Y is that. for each x X, f(y) tends to a limit in Y when y tends to x while remaining in A. The continuous extension f of f to X is then unique. 7

8 Proof. The uniqueness of f follows from the principle of extension of identities (7.1). It is clear that the condition is necessary, for if f is continuous on X, then for each x X we have f(x) = lim y x, y A f(y) = lim f(y) y x, y A Conversely, suppose that the condition is satisfied and define f = lim f(y) y x, y A for each x X; f(x) is a well-defined element of Y, since Y is Hausdorff. We have to show that f is continuous at each point x X. let then V be a closed neighborhood of f(x) in Y ; then by hypothesis there is an open neighborhood V of x in X such that f(v A) V. Since V is a neighborhood of each of its points, we have f(z) = lim f(y) y x, y V A for each z V, and from this it follows that f(z) f(v A) V, since V is closed. The result now follows from the fact that the closed neighborhoods of f(x) form a fundamental system of neighborhoods of f(x) in Y. The mapping f is said to be obtained by extending f by continuity to X. It important to notice that the statement of Theorem (8.1) the hypothesis that Y is regular cannot be weakened without imposing additional restrictions on X, A or f. 9 Normal Spaces. We have seen how certain problems give rice to separation axioms of varying strength. The T axiom enables us to prove a reasonable theorem of continuous extensions. In similar fashion, normal spaces were devised to treat questions concerning continuous functions which were found to lie beyond the scope of regular spaces. This type of separation is stronger than regularity and is given by Definition 9.1. A Hausdorff space is normal if each pair of disjoint closed sets have disjoint open neighborhoods; its topology is then said to be normal. Example 9.1. Any metrizable space X is normal (for instance E n ). Let ρ be a metric generating the topology on X, and let A and B be disjoint, nonempty closed subsets of X. For x A and y B we set V x = O εx (x) = {z X : ρ(x, z) < ε x } where ε x = ρ(x, B)/ > 0 and U y = O εy (y) = {z X : ρ(y, z) < ε y }, where ε y = ρ(y, A)/ > 0. The sets V = {V x : x A} and U = {U y : y B} are disjoint neighborhoods of the sets A and B respectively. This follows from the triangle axiom. 8

9 Definition (9.1) has several equivalent formulations: Proposition X is normal. 2. For each closed A and open U A there is an open V with A V V U.. For each pair of disjoint closed sets A, B, there is an open U with A U and Ū B = Ø. 4. Each pair of disjoint closed sets have neighborhoods whose closures do not intersect. Proof is left as a homework. In the invariance properties, we meet a situation different from those met before. For instance, a subspace of a normal space can fail to be normal; that is axiom T 4 is not inherited be subspaces. This is one of the main inconveniences in dealing with the class of normal spaces. The following theorem summarize invariance properties of normal spaces: Theorem Normality is invariant under continuous closed surjections. 2. A subspace of a normal space need not be normal. However, a closed subspace is normal.. The cartesian product of normal spaces need not be normal. However, if the product is normal, each factor must be normal. Proof. 1. Let Y be normal and p : Y Z be closed and continuous. Given disjoint closed A, B in Z, the normality of Y gives disjoint open sets with p 1 (A) U, p 1 (B) V. Because p is closed, Theorem (26.1) assures that there exist open U A A, V B B such that p 1 (U A ) U, p 1 (V B ) V and U A, V B are evidently the required disjoint neighborhoods of A and B. 2. An example of a non-normal subspace of a normal space will be considered later (in a lecture about compactness). The second assertion is immediate from the observation that a set closed in a closed subspace is also closed in the entire space.. The example of the first assertion (i.e. the cartesian product of normal spaces need not be normal) will be given later. The second statement follows from (2) and (1) (similarly to Theorem (7.2) ()). 9

10 40 Urysohn s characterization of normality. We now turn to the reason for considering the T 4 separation axiom. Normal spaces came to the attention of Urysohn in the 1920 s in connection with the following question: given the space (X, T ), are there enough real-valued continuous functions on X?. The word enough is purposely vague, but at the very last we would like a guarantee of the existence of some non-constant continuous function from X to E 1. The T axiom does not provide such a guarantee. Urysohn was able to show that the T 4 axiom does. More specifically, with each pair of disjoint, closed subsets of any normal space, Urysohn was able to associate a continuous function f : X [0, 1] which separates A and B in the sense that f maps A to 0 and B to 1. It also turns out that, conversely, the existence of an Urysohn function for each pair of disjoint closed sets insures normality of the space. The proof of Urysohn s Lemma is fairly deep, as might be expected of one fundamental results of set topology. We precede it by Lemma (40.1) which handles some of the more technical details. In proving Lemma (40.1) we make use of the easily established fact that, if 0 x < y 1, then dyadic numbers (i.e., of the form m/2 m ) d and d can be found such that x d < d y. Lemma Let (X, T ) be a normal topological space. Let A and B be disjoint T -closed sets. Then, there is a set {U t 0 t 1} of T -open sets such that: 1. A U U 1 B = Ø.. If 0 x < y 1, then Ūx U y. Proof. Define U 1 = X B. Then, A U 1, and U 1 is T -open and U 1 B = Ø. By Proposition (9.1), there is some T -open set U 0 such that A U 0 Ū0 U 1. We now proceed to fill in U t when 0 < t < 1. We first work with t dyadic, proceeding by induction. Suppose n is a non-negative integer, and that the sets U k/2 n have been defined for integers k, 0 k 2 n 1 (note that U 0 and U 1 have already been defined). Thus, Ū j/2 n U i/2 n for 0 j < i 2 n 1. We must define the sets U i/2 n+1, 0 i 2 n+1 1. Note first that we need only consider odd values of i. If i is even. say i = 2j, then 0 j 2 n 1 and i/2 n+1 = j/2 n, and U j/2 n has already been defined by the inductive hypothesis. 10

11 Suppose then that i is odd, say i = 2k n+1 1, for some k, 0 k 2 n 1. Then, again, by Proposition (9.1), since Ūk/2 n U (k+a)/2n, there is some T -open set V such that Ū k/2 n V V U (k+1)/2 n. Let U (2k+1)/2 n+1 = V. This defines U i/2 n+1 for all i, 0 i 2 n+1 1. By induction, the sets U d are now defined for all dyadic d. Now let t be any number in [0, 1]. Define U t = d t U d the union being over all dyadics d in [0, 1] with d t. If t is dyadic, then this definition agrees with that arrived at by induction. Finally, suppose that 0 x < y 1. Then there are dyadic numbers i/2 n and j/2 m with x j/2 m < i/2 n y. Now, U i/2 n U y by definition of U y. Further, for all dyadic d with 0 d x, we have d j/2 m, so U d U j/2 m, hence U x U j/2 m. Then and the Lemma is proved. Ū x Ūj/2 m U j/2 n U y, We now prove the main theorem, which traditionally is known as Urysohn s Lemma. It is understood in the proof that [0, 1] is considered as a subspace of Euclidean space E 1. Theorem (Urysohn s Lemma). Let (X, T ) be a Hausdorff topological space. Then the following are equivalent: 1. (X, T ) is normal. 2. If A and B are disjoint non-empty T -closed sets, then there exists a continuous f : X E 1, called a Urysohn function for A, B, such that: (a) 0 f(x) 1 for all x X (b) f(a) = 0 for all a A (c) f(b) = 1 for all b B Proof. (2) (1) : If A and B are non-empty, disjoint, T -closed subsets of X, then produce by (2) an Urysohn function f and note that f 1 ([0, 1[) and f 1 (] 1, 1]) are disjoint, T -neighborhoods of A and 2 2 B respectively. 11

12 (1) (2) : Assume (1). Let A and B be non-empty, disjoint, T -closed sets. Let the T -open sets U t, 0 t 1, be as given by Lemma (40.1). If x X, define: f(x) = { 1 if x U1 inf{t x U t } if x U 1 Immediately, f : X [0, 1]. If x B, then x U 1, so f(x) = 1. If x A, then x U 0 and x U 1, so f(x) = 0. There remains to show that f is continuous. Let x X and let ε > 0. Consider three cases: i) f(x) = 0 We may assume without loss of generality that ε < 1. Then, f(y) f(x) = f(y) = f(y) ε/2 < ε for y U ε/2. ii) f(x) = 1 Again, we may assume that ε < 1. If y X Ū1 ε/2, then y U j for j 1 ε/2. Then, f(y) 1 ε/2, so 1 f(y) = f(x) f(y) ε/2 < ε iii) 0 < f(x) < 1 We may assume that ε f(x) and f(x) + ε 1. Let y U f(x)+ε/2 (X Ūf(x) ε/2). Since y U f(x)+ε/2, then y B, and f(y) f(x) + ε/2 < f(x) + ε, so f(y) f(x) < ε. But also y X Ūf(x) ε/2, so y Ūj for 0 j f(x) ε/2. Then, (y) f(x) ε/2 > f(x) ε, so f(y) f(x) > ε. Then, ε < f(y) f(x) < ε, so f(y) f(x) < ε. By cases i) through iii), f is continuous at x X, hence f is continuous. Remarks: 1. The pair 0 and 1 can be obviously replaced by any (not necessary nonnegative) pair α < β, since the continuity of f implies that of α + (β α)f. 2. The Urysohn function f in Theorem (40.1) evidently satisfies A f 1 (0). The theorem does not assert that A = f 1 (0); in fact, this is possible only for certain types of closed sets. This problem we will consider later. 12

13 41 Tietze s characterization of normality. The very strong connection between the T 4 separation axiom and real continuous functions on X, suggested by Urysohn s Lemma, is very clearly revealed by the next theorem, which should be compared with Theorem (8.1). Theorem (41.1) says that normality is sufficient for the existence of a continuous extension of any real-valued function continuous on any closed subspace. The converse is also true, so that normality is just the right condition for treating the extension problem on closed subspaces. Theorem (41.1) is often known as Tietze s Extension Theorem, although there is some confusion about assigning credit here. Historically, Tietze seems to have been the first to define normality, in 192. Urysohn s Lemma clarified its role in the theory of continuous functions. Tietze proved his extension theorem for metric spaces, which of course are normal, but it was Urysohn who generalized the result to arbitrary normal spaces. Thus Bourbaki refers to Theorem (41.1) as a theorem of Urysohn, and Dugundji as Tietze s Theorem. Alexandroff calls it Brouwer-Urysohn Theorem, and Stone the Lebesgue-Urysohn Theorem. It would appear to be fair to credit Tietze with the first proof for a wide class of spaces (metric spaces), and Urysohn with the proof of the general statement. In the course of the proof, we shall use the Cauchy criterion for the convergence of real sequences, and also the fact that lim S n+k S n = L S n for any real sequence S if lim S n = L. Preliminary k n Lemma (41.1) will absorb some if the technical details. In Lemma (41.1) and Theorem (41.1), all intervals [a, b] are considered as subspaces of E 1. Lemma Let (X, T ) be a normal space. Let F be a T -closed subset of X and let f : F [ 1, 1] be continuous. Then, there is a continuous g : X [ 1, 1 ] such that g(x) f(x) 2 for each x F. Proof. Let A = f 1 ([ 1, 1]) and B = f 1 ([ 1, 1]). Since f is continuous, A and B are T -closed. Since A B = Ø and T is normal, there is by Urysohn s Lemma some continuous h : X [0, 1] such that h(a) = {0} and h(b) = {1}. Let t(x) = 2x 1, for 0 x 1. This defines an homeomorphism t : [0, 1] [ 1, 1]. Let g = t h. Then, g : X [ 1, 1 ] is continuous. If x A, then g(x) = t(h(x)) = t(0) = 1. Since f(x) [ 1, 1], then f(x) g(x) 2. If x B, then g(x) = t(1) = 1. Since f(x) [ 1, 1], then f(x) g(x) 2. Finally, if x F (A B), then 1 < f(x) < 1, so g(x) f(x) 2. Theorem (Tietze-Urysohn) Let (X, T ) be a Hausdorff space. equivalent: Then the following are 1

14 1. T is normal. 2. If A is T -closed and f : A E 1 is continuous, then, there is a continuous F : X E 1 such that F A = f. Proof. (2) (1) : Assume (2). Suppose that A and B are disjoint T -closed sets. Define f : A B E 1 by: { 0 if x A f(x) = 1 if x B Then f is easily seen to be continuous. By (2) produce a continuous extension F of f to X. Then, F 1 (] 1, 1[) and F 1 (] 1, 2[) are disjoint T -open neighborhoods of A and B respectively. Hence T is 2 2 normal. (2) (1) : Assume (1). Let A be T -closed. Suppose f : A E 1 is continuous. We consider two cases and proceed in steps. Case 1. f is bounded. Then for some M > 0, f(x) M for each x A. We may assume without loss of generality that f : A [ 1, 1]. For, (1/M)f(x) 1 for each x A, and it is immediate that MF is a continuous extension of f if F is a continuous extension of (1/M)f. Thus, suppose that f : A [ 1, 1]. i) If n is a non-negative integer, then there is a continuous F n : X [ 1 + ( 2 )n+1, 1 ( 2 )n+1 ] such that F n (x) f(x) ( 2 )n+1 for each x A and, if K is a positive integer, F m (x) F n (x) 2( 2 )K+1 for m, n K. We produce the functions F n by an inductive construction. By Lemma (41.1), there is a continuous F 0 : X [ 1, 1] such that F 0 f(x) 2 for each x A. Now suppose n is a non-negative integer, and F n has been defined. Let ϕ(x) = ( 2 )n+1 (f(x) F n (x)) for each x A. Then, ϕ is continuous: A [ 1, 1]. By Lemma (41.1), there is a continuous β : X [ 1, 1] such that β(x) ϕ(x) 2 for each x A. 14

15 Let F n+1 (x) = F n (x) + ( 2 )n+1 β(x) for each x X. F n+1 is continuous: X [ 1 + ( 2 )n+2, 1 ( 2 )n+2 ]. Further, if x A, then ( ) n+1 2 F n+1 (x) f(x) = F n (x) + β(x) f(x) ( ) n+1 ( ) n+1 2 = β(x) (f(x) F n (x)) 2 ( ) n+1 2 = β(x) ϕ(x) ( ) n+1 ( ) ( ) n = Finally, let x X and let n be a positive integer. By the definition of F n+1, F n+1 (x) F n (x) = ( 2 ) n+1 β(x) ( 2 ) n+1 1 = 2n+1 / n+2. By inducting we have, for r 1, Then, for m, n K, r 1 F n+r (x) F n (x) F n+j+1 (x) F n+j (x) j=0 r 1 ( ) 2 n+j+1 = 2n+1 r 1 j=0 < 2n+1 n+2 n+j+2 j=0 ( ) j 2 = n+2 j=0 ) n+1 ( 2 ( ) j 2 F m (x) F n (x) F m (x) F K (x) + F n (x) F K (x) ( ) K+1 ( ) K+1 ( ) K = 2 ii) If x X then lim n F n (x) exists, and 1 lim n F n (x) 1. Existence follows from i). Since ( 2 K+1 ) 0 as K, then {Fn (x)} n=0 is a Cauchy sequence to E 1, hence converges. Since 1 F n (x) 1 for each n, then 1 lim F n(x) 1 also. n iii) Let F (x) = lim F n (x) for each x X. n Then, F is continuous on X to [ 1, 1]. 15

16 All that requires proof is the continuity. Let x X and ε > 0. Note that F (z) F n = ( ) n+1 2 lim F (n + K) F n 2 for each n Z + and z X. K Now, if y X, then for any n Z + we have F (x) F (y) F (x) F n (x) + F n (x) F n (y) + F n (y) F (y) ( ) n+1 2 Choose n sufficiently large that 2 > ε/. Since F n is continuous, there is a T -neighborhood. V of x such that F n (x) F n (y) < ε/ if y V. Then, for each y V, F (x) F (y) < ε/ + ε/ + ε/ = ε, implying that F is continuous at x, hence continuous. iv) F A = f. Let x A and ε > 0. Then, for each n Z +, F (x) f(x) F n (x) F (x) + F n (x) f(x) F n (x) F (x) + Choose n sufficiently large that ( 2 ) n+1 < ε/2 and Fn (x) F (x) < ε/2. Then, F (x) f(x) < ε, implying F (x) = f(x). ( ) n+1 2. This completes the proof of the theorem in case 1. Case 2. f is not bounded. Define g(x) = f(x) for each x A 1+ f(x) Please try to complete the proof by filling the details of the remaining steps. v) g is continuous: A [ 1, 1]. vi) There exists a continuous G : X [ 1, 1] such that G A = g (apply case 1 to g). vii) There is a continuous h : X [0, 1] such that h(a) = 1 whenever a A and h(b) = 0 whenever G(b) = 1 or G(b) = 1. (apply Urysohn s Lemma to A and G 1 ({ 1} {1}).) viii) Let F (x) = G(x)h(x) Then F is continuous: X E 1 and F A = f. This completes 1 G(x)h(x) the proof of the theorem. 16

### Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

### Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces

Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1988 2008 Contents 1 Topological Spaces 1 1.1 Continuity and Topological Spaces...............

### MAT2400 Analysis I. A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions

MAT2400 Analysis I A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions In Analysis I there is a lot of manipulations with sets and functions. It is probably also the first course where you have to take

### SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576

SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576 SOLUTIONS BY OLIVIER MARTIN 13 #5. Let T be the topology generated by A on X. We want to show T = J B J where B is the set of all topologies J on X with A J. This amounts

### Compactness in metric spaces

MATHEMATICS 3103 (Functional Analysis) YEAR 2012 2013, TERM 2 HANDOUT #2: COMPACTNESS OF METRIC SPACES Compactness in metric spaces The closed intervals [a, b] of the real line, and more generally the

### Geometry 2: Remedial topology

Geometry 2: Remedial topology Rules: You may choose to solve only hard exercises (marked with!, * and **) or ordinary ones (marked with! or unmarked), or both, if you want to have extra problems. To have

### Course 221: Analysis Academic year , First Semester

Course 221: Analysis Academic year 2007-08, First Semester David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1989 2007 Contents 1 Basic Theorems of Real Analysis 1 1.1 The Least Upper Bound Principle................

### 6. Metric spaces. In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. d : X X [0, )

6. Metric spaces In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. Definitions. A metric on a non-empty set X is a map with the following properties: d : X X [0, ) (i) If x, y X are points

### SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3 Fall 2008 III. Spaces with special properties III.1 : Compact spaces I Problems from Munkres, 26, pp. 170 172 3. Show that a finite union of compact subspaces

### Chap2: The Real Number System (See Royden pp40)

Chap2: The Real Number System (See Royden pp40) 1 Open and Closed Sets of Real Numbers The simplest sets of real numbers are the intervals. We define the open interval (a, b) to be the set (a, b) = {x

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence

### BOREL SETS, WELL-ORDERINGS OF R AND THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS. Proof. We shall define inductively a decreasing sequence of infinite subsets of N

BOREL SETS, WELL-ORDERINGS OF R AND THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS SIMON THOMAS 1. The Finite Basis Problem Definition 1.1. Let C be a class of structures. Then a basis for C is a collection B C such that for

### Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................

### Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces

APPENDIX A Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces We present here the basic theory of Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces. Standard references for this material are the books [143, 231]. A.1. Polish

### CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY

CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY Topology, sometimes referred to as the mathematics of continuity, or rubber sheet geometry, or the theory of abstract topological spaces, is all of these, but, above all, it is

### S(A) X α for all α Λ. Consequently, S(A) X, by the definition of intersection. Therefore, X is inductive.

MA 274: Exam 2 Study Guide (1) Know the precise definitions of the terms requested for your journal. (2) Review proofs by induction. (3) Be able to prove that something is or isn t an equivalence relation.

### Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

### INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY

M.Sc. program in mathematics INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY Katalin Károlyi Department of Applied Analysis, Eötvös Loránd University H-1088 Budapest, Múzeum krt. 6-8. CONTENTS 1. SETS Set, equal sets, subset,

### Finite Sets. Theorem 5.1. Two non-empty finite sets have the same cardinality if and only if they are equivalent.

MATH 337 Cardinality Dr. Neal, WKU We now shall prove that the rational numbers are a countable set while R is uncountable. This result shows that there are two different magnitudes of infinity. But we

### 4. Expanding dynamical systems

4.1. Metric definition. 4. Expanding dynamical systems Definition 4.1. Let X be a compact metric space. A map f : X X is said to be expanding if there exist ɛ > 0 and L > 1 such that d(f(x), f(y)) Ld(x,

### Point Set Topology. A. Topological Spaces and Continuous Maps

Point Set Topology A. Topological Spaces and Continuous Maps Definition 1.1 A topology on a set X is a collection T of subsets of X satisfying the following axioms: T 1.,X T. T2. {O α α I} T = α IO α T.

### Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009)

1 Distance J Muscat 1 Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009) (A revised and expanded version of these notes are now published by Springer.) 1 Distance A metric space can be thought of

### This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics.

Appendix A Set Theory This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics. A.1 Basic Definitions Definition A.1.1. A set is an unordered collection of elements.

### Lecture Notes on Topology for MAT3500/4500 following J. R. Munkres textbook. John Rognes

Lecture Notes on Topology for MAT3500/4500 following J. R. Munkres textbook John Rognes November 29th 2010 Contents Introduction v 1 Set Theory and Logic 1 1.1 ( 1) Fundamental Concepts..............................

### Sets and Cardinality Notes for C. F. Miller

Sets and Cardinality Notes for 620-111 C. F. Miller Semester 1, 2000 Abstract These lecture notes were compiled in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics in the University of Melbourne for the use

### Chapter 1. Metric Spaces. Metric Spaces. Examples. Normed linear spaces

Chapter 1. Metric Spaces Metric Spaces MA222 David Preiss d.preiss@warwick.ac.uk Warwick University, Spring 2008/2009 Definitions. A metric on a set M is a function d : M M R such that for all x, y, z

### CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

### TOPOLOGY: THE JOURNEY INTO SEPARATION AXIOMS

TOPOLOGY: THE JOURNEY INTO SEPARATION AXIOMS VIPUL NAIK Abstract. In this journey, we are going to explore the so called separation axioms in greater detail. We shall try to understand how these axioms

### Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize

### Weak topologies. David Lecomte. May 23, 2006

Weak topologies David Lecomte May 3, 006 1 Preliminaries from general topology In this section, we are given a set X, a collection of topological spaces (Y i ) i I and a collection of maps (f i ) i I such

### Sets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.

Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.

### INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY

INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY ALEX KÜRONYA In preparation January 24, 2010 Contents 1. Basic concepts 1 2. Constructing topologies 13 2.1. Subspace topology 13 2.2. Local properties 18 2.3. Product topology

### THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear

### Infinite product spaces

Chapter 7 Infinite product spaces So far we have talked a lot about infinite sequences of independent random variables but we have never shown how to construct such sequences within the framework of probability/measure

### 1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1

Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or

### CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE

CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE With the notion of bijection at hand, it is easy to formalize the idea that two finite sets have the same number of elements: we just need to verify

### REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein and Shakarchi s text, Chapter 1. 1. Prove that the Cantor set C constructed in the text is totally disconnected and perfect. In other

### Analytic Sets Vadim Kulikov Presentation 11 March 2008

Analytic Sets Vadim Kulikov Presentation 11 March 2008 Abstract. The continuous images of Borel sets are not usually Borel sets. However they are measurable and that is the main purpose of this lecture.

### Problem Set. Problem Set #2. Math 5322, Fall December 3, 2001 ANSWERS

Problem Set Problem Set #2 Math 5322, Fall 2001 December 3, 2001 ANSWERS i Problem 1. [Problem 18, page 32] Let A P(X) be an algebra, A σ the collection of countable unions of sets in A, and A σδ the collection

### PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS

PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS This material assumes that you are already familiar with the real number system and the representation of the real numbers as points on the real line. I.1. THE NATURAL NUMBERS

### 1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.

1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set. Basic Topology Written by Men-Gen Tsai email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw Proof: For any element x of the empty set, x is also an element of every set since

### Math 317 HW #7 Solutions

Math 17 HW #7 Solutions 1. Exercise..5. Decide which of the following sets are compact. For those that are not compact, show how Definition..1 breaks down. In other words, give an example of a sequence

### A CHARACTERIZATION OF C k (X) FOR X NORMAL AND REALCOMPACT

Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana (3) Vol. 12, 2006 A CHARACTERIZATION OF C k (X) FOR X NORMAL AND REALCOMPACT F. MONTALVO, A. A. PULGARÍN AND B. REQUEJO Abstract. We present some internal conditions on a locally

### Structure of Measurable Sets

Structure of Measurable Sets In these notes we discuss the structure of Lebesgue measurable subsets of R from several different points of view. Along the way, we will see several alternative characterizations

### Math 563 Measure Theory Project 1 (Funky Functions Group) Luis Zerón, Sergey Dyachenko

Math 563 Measure Theory Project (Funky Functions Group) Luis Zerón, Sergey Dyachenko 34 Let C and C be any two Cantor sets (constructed in Exercise 3) Show that there exists a function F: [,] [,] with

### MOP 2007 Black Group Integer Polynomials Yufei Zhao. Integer Polynomials. June 29, 2007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu

Integer Polynomials June 9, 007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu We will use Z[x] to denote the ring of polynomials with integer coefficients. We begin by summarizing some of the common approaches used in dealing

### THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE. Contents

THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE ALEX PONIECKI Abstract. This paper will study contractions of metric spaces. To do this, we will mainly use tools from topology. We will give some examples of contractions,

### NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY. M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete. Autumn of 2004

NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Autumn of 2004 2 Contents 1 σ-algebras 7 1.1 σ-algebras............................... 7 1.2 Generated σ-algebras.........................

### k=1 k2, and therefore f(m + 1) = f(m) + (m + 1) 2 =

Math 104: Introduction to Analysis SOLUTIONS Alexander Givental HOMEWORK 1 1.1. Prove that 1 2 +2 2 + +n 2 = 1 n(n+1)(2n+1) for all n N. 6 Put f(n) = n(n + 1)(2n + 1)/6. Then f(1) = 1, i.e the theorem

### FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Cosets and the Quotient Space Any vector space is an abelian group under the operation of vector addition. So, if you are have studied

### Fixed Point Theorems in Topology and Geometry

Fixed Point Theorems in Topology and Geometry A Senior Thesis Submitted to the Department of Mathematics In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Departmental Honors Baccalaureate By Morgan Schreffler

### Limits and convergence.

Chapter 2 Limits and convergence. 2.1 Limit points of a set of real numbers 2.1.1 Limit points of a set. DEFINITION: A point x R is a limit point of a set E R if for all ε > 0 the set (x ε,x + ε) E is

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics

Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some

### Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the axioms and any previously proven theorems.

Math 232 - Discrete Math 2.1 Direct Proofs and Counterexamples Notes Axiom: Proposition that is assumed to be true. Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the

### Lecture 1-1,2. Definition. Sets A and B have the same cardinality if there is an invertible function f : A B.

Topology Summary This is a summary of the results discussed in lectures. These notes will be gradually growing as the time passes by. Most of the time proofs will not be given. You are supposed to be able

### I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called

### Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson

Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement

### Classical Analysis I

Classical Analysis I 1 Sets, relations, functions A set is considered to be a collection of objects. The objects of a set A are called elements of A. If x is an element of a set A, we write x A, and if

### it is easy to see that α = a

21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore

### Math 421, Homework #5 Solutions

Math 421, Homework #5 Solutions (1) (8.3.6) Suppose that E R n and C is a subset of E. (a) Prove that if E is closed, then C is relatively closed in E if and only if C is a closed set (as defined in Definition

### A LEBESGUE MEASURABLE SET THAT IS NOT BOREL

A LEBESGUE MEASURABLE SET THAT IS NOT BOREL SAM SCHIAVONE Tuesday, 16 October 2012 1. Outline (1 Ternary Expansions (2 The Cantor Set (3 The Cantor Ternary Function (a.k.a. The Devil s Staircase Function

### Math 3000 Running Glossary

Math 3000 Running Glossary Last Updated on: July 15, 2014 The definition of items marked with a must be known precisely. Chapter 1: 1. A set: A collection of objects called elements. 2. The empty set (

### (Refer Slide Time: 1:41)

Discrete Mathematical Structures Dr. Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture # 10 Sets Today we shall learn about sets. You must

### Foundations of Mathematics I Set Theory (only a draft)

Foundations of Mathematics I Set Theory (only a draft) Ali Nesin Mathematics Department Istanbul Bilgi University Kuştepe Şişli Istanbul Turkey anesin@bilgi.edu.tr February 12, 2004 2 Contents I Naive

### Math 507/420 Homework Assignment #1: Due in class on Friday, September 20. SOLUTIONS

Math 507/420 Homework Assignment #1: Due in class on Friday, September 20. SOLUTIONS 1. Show that a nonempty collection A of subsets is an algebra iff 1) for all A, B A, A B A and 2) for all A A, A c A.

### CHAPTER 5: MODULAR ARITHMETIC

CHAPTER 5: MODULAR ARITHMETIC LECTURE NOTES FOR MATH 378 (CSUSM, SPRING 2009). WAYNE AITKEN 1. Introduction In this chapter we will consider congruence modulo m, and explore the associated arithmetic called

### How many miles to βx? d miles, or just one foot

How many miles to βx? d miles, or just one foot Masaru Kada Kazuo Tomoyasu Yasuo Yoshinobu Abstract It is known that the Stone Čech compactification βx of a metrizable space X is approximated by the collection

### The Banach-Tarski Paradox

University of Oslo MAT2 Project The Banach-Tarski Paradox Author: Fredrik Meyer Supervisor: Nadia S. Larsen Abstract In its weak form, the Banach-Tarski paradox states that for any ball in R, it is possible

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights

### Exercise 1. Let E be a given set. Prove that the following statements are equivalent.

Real Variables, Fall 2014 Problem set 1 Solution suggestions Exercise 1. Let E be a given set. Prove that the following statements are equivalent. (i) E is measurable. (ii) Given ε > 0, there exists an

### Sets, Relations and Functions

Sets, Relations and Functions Eric Pacuit Department of Philosophy University of Maryland, College Park pacuit.org epacuit@umd.edu ugust 26, 2014 These notes provide a very brief background in discrete

### Notes on metric spaces

Notes on metric spaces 1 Introduction The purpose of these notes is to quickly review some of the basic concepts from Real Analysis, Metric Spaces and some related results that will be used in this course.

### Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis

Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis Erhan Çinlar Robert J. Vanderbei February 2, 2000 Contents Sets and Functions 1 1 Sets................................... 1 Subsets.............................

### 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers.

+a 1. R In this and the next section we are going to study the properties of sequences of real numbers. Definition 1.1. (Sequence) A sequence is a function with domain N. Example 1.2. A sequence of real

### In mathematics you don t understand things. You just get used to them. (Attributed to John von Neumann)

Chapter 1 Sets and Functions We understand a set to be any collection M of certain distinct objects of our thought or intuition (called the elements of M) into a whole. (Georg Cantor, 1895) In mathematics

### SETS, RELATIONS, AND FUNCTIONS

September 27, 2009 and notations Common Universal Subset and Power Set Cardinality Operations A set is a collection or group of objects or elements or members (Cantor 1895). the collection of the four

### BANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW

BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but

### Dedekind s forgotten axiom and why we should teach it (and why we shouldn t teach mathematical induction in our calculus classes)

Dedekind s forgotten axiom and why we should teach it (and why we shouldn t teach mathematical induction in our calculus classes) by Jim Propp (UMass Lowell) March 14, 2010 1 / 29 Completeness Three common

### Math 104: Introduction to Analysis

Math 104: Introduction to Analysis Evan Chen UC Berkeley Notes for the course MATH 104, instructed by Charles Pugh. 1 1 August 29, 2013 Hard: #22 in Chapter 1. Consider a pile of sand principle. You wish

### 9 More on differentiation

Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 75 9 More on differentiation 9a Finite Taylor expansion............... 75 9b Continuous and nowhere differentiable..... 78 9c Differentiable and nowhere monotone......

### 2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems

42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions

### God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886)

Chapter 2 Numbers God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886) God created the integers and the rest is the work

### Chapter 6 SEQUENCES. sn 1+1,s 1 =1 is again an abbreviation for the sequence { 1, 1 2, 1 } n N ε,d (s n,s) <ε.

Chapter 6 SEQUENCES 6.1 Sequences A sequence is a function whose domain is the set of natural numbers N. If s is a sequence, we usually denote its value at n by s n instead of s (n). We may refer to the

### No: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics

No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results

### MATH 289 PROBLEM SET 1: INDUCTION. 1. The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear:

MATH 89 PROBLEM SET : INDUCTION The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear: Axiom Every nonempty subset of the set of nonnegative integers Z 0 = {0,,, 3,

### Assignment 7; Due Friday, November 11

Assignment 7; Due Friday, November 9.8 a The set Q is not connected because we can write it as a union of two nonempty disjoint open sets, for instance U = (, 2) and V = ( 2, ). The connected subsets are

### POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS

POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS RUSS WOODROOFE 1. Unique Factorization Domains Throughout the following, we think of R as sitting inside R[x] as the constant polynomials (of degree 0).

### Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure.

Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure. October 19, 2010 Today s lecture will be devoted to Lebesgue measure, a creation of Henri Lebesgue, in his thesis, one of the most famous theses in the history of mathematics.

### A domain of spacetime intervals in general relativity

A domain of spacetime intervals in general relativity Keye Martin Department of Mathematics Tulane University New Orleans, LA 70118 United States of America martin@math.tulane.edu Prakash Panangaden School

### Module MA1S11 (Calculus) Michaelmas Term 2016 Section 3: Functions

Module MA1S11 (Calculus) Michaelmas Term 2016 Section 3: Functions D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 2016 Contents 3 Functions 43 3.1 Functions between Sets...................... 43 3.2 Injective

### Metric and Topological Spaces. Ivan Smith

Metric and Topological Spaces Ivan Smith Summer 2006 L1: Topological spaces The central idea of topology is that it makes sense to talk about continuity without talking about distance. We do this by formalising

### Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials

Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.

### DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS

DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS ASHER M. KACH, KAREN LANGE, AND REED SOLOMON Abstract. We construct two computable presentations of computable torsion-free abelian groups, one of isomorphism

### vertex, 369 disjoint pairwise, 395 disjoint sets, 236 disjunction, 33, 36 distributive laws

Index absolute value, 135 141 additive identity, 254 additive inverse, 254 aleph, 466 algebra of sets, 245, 278 antisymmetric relation, 387 arcsine function, 349 arithmetic sequence, 208 arrow diagram,

### The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if

### Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction

### Notes 2 for Honors Probability and Statistics

Notes 2 for Honors Probability and Statistics Ernie Croot August 24, 2010 1 Examples of σ-algebras and Probability Measures So far, the only examples of σ-algebras we have seen are ones where the sample

### Convergent Sequence. Definition A sequence {p n } in a metric space (X, d) is said to converge if there is a point p X with the following property:

Convergent Sequence Definition A sequence {p n } in a metric space (X, d) is said to converge if there is a point p X with the following property: ( ɛ > 0)( N)( n > N)d(p n, p) < ɛ In this case we also