FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z


 Alyson Curtis
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization properties in Z[[x]], the ring of formal power series over Z We treat polynomials of arbitrary degree and give sufficient conditions for their reducibility as power series Moreover, if a polynomial is reducible over Z[[x]], we provide an explicit factorization algorithm For polynomials whose constant term is a prime power, our study leads to the discussion of padic integers 1 Introduction In this paper we consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization as elements of Z[[x]], the ring of formal power series over Z We treat polynomials of arbitrary degree and give sufficient conditions for their reducibility in Z[[x]] For polynomials of degree two or three these conditions are also necessary If the constant term of the polynomial is not a prime power, the reducibility discussion is straightforward We briefly address these cases in Section 2 On the other hand, if the constant term of the polynomial is a nontrivial prime power, say p n with p prime and n 2, the question of reducibility in Z[[x]] leads in some cases (when n is no greater than twice the padic valuation of the linear coefficient) to the discussion of padic integers In this context, our main result is that, if such a polynomial has a root in Z p whose padic valuation is positive, then it is reducible in Z[[x]] This particular case is presented in Section 3 Our proofs are constructive and provide explicit factorization algorithms All the needed material regarding the ring Z p of padic integers can be found in [5, 6] It is important to note that irreducible elements in Z[x] and in Z[[x]] are, in general, unrelated For instance, 6+x+x 2 is irreducible in Z[x] but can be factored in Z[[x]], while 2 + 7x + 3x 2 is irreducible in Z[[x]] but equals (2 + x)(1 + 3x) as a polynomial Observe that the latter is not a proper factorization in Z[[x]] since 1 + 3x is an invertible element More examples and a few remarks concerning the hypotheses of our main theorem are given in Section 4 A first study of the factorization theory of quadratic polynomials in Z[[x]] was presented in [3] In that paper we established necessary and sufficient conditions for a quadratic polynomial to be irreducible in Z[[x]] In particular, for polynomials whose constant term is a power of a prime p, we showed in [3] that reducibility in Z[[x]] is related to reducibility in Z p [x] Some of the basic ideas from [2] and [3] are summarized in Section Mathematics Subject Classification 13P05;13F25,11Y05,11D88 Key words and phrases Factorization, integral polynomials, power series, padic numbers D Birmajer would like to acknowledge the support and hospitality of the Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis, Argentina 1
2 2 DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER The results of this paper contain and expand those obtained in [3] to polynomials in Z[x] of arbitrary degree The special case of cubic polynomials is explicitly and fully discussed in Section 4 Recently, J Elliott posted a preprint [4] that discusses the irreducibility and factoring of polynomials in the ring of formal power series over a principal ideal domain His methods are different from ours and his results rely on a generalization of the padic Weierstrass preparation theorem Finally, we would like to acknowledge our correspondence with JP Bézivin We appreciate his initiative to share with us an early draft of his unpublished work We also thank the IJNT referee for all the useful suggestions 2 Preliminaries We start by reviewing some of the basic properties of the factorization theory of power series over Z For a more extensive discussion, we refer the reader to [2] Let f(x) = f 0 + f 1 x + + f d x d be a polynomial with integer coefficients It is easy to check that f(x) is invertible in Z[[x]] if and only if f 0 = ±1 In particular, the reducibility of f(x) is equivalent to the reducibility of f(x) Also observe that if f 0 = 0, then f(x) is either an associate of x or f(x) has x as a proper factor For this reason, it suffices to look at the cases when f 0 > 0 We say that f(x) is reducible in Z[[x]] if there exist power series, A(x) = a k x k and B(x) = b k x k with a k, b k Z, k=0 k=0 such that a 0 ±1, b 0 ±1, and f(x) = A(x)B(x) A proof of the following basic proposition can be found in [2] Proposition 21 Let f(x) be a noninvertible polynomial in Z[[x]] with f 0 > 0 (a) If f 0 is prime, then f(x) is irreducible in Z[[x]] (b) If f 0 is not a prime power, then f(x) is reducible in Z[[x]] (c) If f 0 = p n with p prime, n 2, and p f 1, then f(x) is irreducible in Z[[x]] As an immediate consequence, we have: Proposition 22 (Linear polynomials) A polynomial f(x) = p n + f 1 x with n 2 is reducible in Z[[x]] if and only if p f 1 It remains to examine the reducibility of nonlinear polynomials of the form f(x) = p n + p m γ 1 x + γ 2 x γ d x d, γ d 0, (23) with p prime, n 2, m 1, gcd(p, γ 1 ) = 1 or γ 1 = 0, and gcd(p, γ 2,, γ d ) = 1 As it turns out, the reducibility of such polynomials depends on the relation between the parameters n and m in (23) and on their factorization properties as elements of Z p [x] Accordingly, we divide our study into two cases: The case when n > 2m, see Proposition 25, and the case when n 2m, which is more involved and will be investigated in the next section Remark 24 If a polynomial of the form (23) has no linear term, ie if γ 1 = 0, we can assume m as large as needed and can therefore discuss its reducibility as for the case when n 2m
3 FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN Z[[x]] 3 Proposition 25 If n > 2m and gcd(p, γ 1 ) = 1, then the polynomial f(x) in (23) is reducible in both Z[[x]] and Z p [x] Proof First of all, observe that f(p n ) 0 (mod p n ), and f (p n ) 0 (mod p m ) because n > m Moreover, since n > 2m m + 1 and gcd(p, γ 1 ) = 1, we have f (p n ) 0 (mod p m+1 ) Then, by Hensel s lemma, p n lifts to a root of f(x) in Z p Thus f(x) is reducible in Z p [x] To show the reducibility of f(x) in Z[[x]], we give an inductive procedure to find a k, b k Z such that f(x) = ( p m + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 + )( p n m + b 1 x + b 2 x 2 + ) First of all, observe that n > 2m implies n m > m As a first step, we need p m γ 1 = p m (b 1 + p n 2m a 1 ) γ 2 = p m s 2 + a 1 (γ 1 p n 2m a 1 ) (26) with s 2 = b 2 + p n 2m a 2 If we let h(x) = γ 2 γ 1 x + p n 2m x 2, then solving the last equation is equivalent to finding a 1 Z such that h(a 1 ) 0 (mod p m ) Since the discriminant of h(x) is a square mod p, there exists r Z p such that h(r) = 0 We let a 1 Z be the reduction of r mod p m With this choice of a 1 we can now use (26) to determine that b 1 = γ 1 p n 2m a 1 and s 2 = h(a 1 )/p m With the notation the rest of the equations become s j = b j + p n 2m a j, j = 2, 3, (27) γ 3 = p m s 3 + a 2 (γ 1 2p n 2m a 1 ) + a 1 s 2 γ 4 = p m s 4 + a 3 (γ 1 2p n 2m a 1 ) + a 1 s 3 + a 2 b 2 γ d = p m s d + a d 1 (γ 1 2p n 2m a 1 ) + a 1 s d 1 + a 2 b d a d 2 b 2 0 = p m s d+1 + a d (γ 1 2p n 2m a 1 ) + a 1 s d + a 2 b d a d 1 b 2 0 = p m s k+1 + a k (γ 1 2p n 2m a 1 ) + a 1 s k + a 2 b k a k 1 b 2 Since γ 1 2p n 2m a 1 is not divisible by p, there are integers a 2 and s 3 such that the equation for γ 3 is satisfied Now that a 2 has been chosen, we combine it with s 2 in (27) to determine b 2 For each of the above equations, the same argument can be used to solve inductively for the pair a k, s k+1 Z At each iteration, equation (27) then gives b k In the next section, we will make use of the following elementary result: Lemma 28 (Theorem 142 in [5]) A polynomial with integer coefficients has a root in Z p if and only if it has an integer root modulo p k for any k 1
4 4 DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER 3 Factorization in the presence of a padic root In this section, we finish our discussion of reducibility in Z[[x]] for polynomials with integer coefficients Our results rely on the existence of a root ϱ pz p, and the nature of the factorization depends on the multiplicity of ϱ and on its padic valuation, denoted by v p (ϱ) As we will show later, the existence of a root in pz p is a necessary condition for quadratic and cubic polynomials If ϱ pz p is a multiple root of f(x), then f(x) is reducible in Z[x]: Proposition 31 Let f(x) be a polynomial of degree d 2 If f(x) has a multiple root ϱ Z p with v p (ϱ) = l 1, then f(x) admits a proper factorization f(x) = G(x) f red (x) where G(x) = gcd(f, f ) in Z[x], and f red (x) = f(x)/g(x) Proof Let ϱ Z p with v p (ϱ) = l be the multiple root of f(x) Let G(x) = gcd(f, f ) Z[x] Then f red (x) = f(x)/g(x) is an element of Z[x] and f(x) = G(x)f red (x) This factorization is also valid in Q p [x], and every root of f(x) is a simple root of f red (x) Thus, together with f red (ϱ) = 0, we must also have G(ϱ) = 0 Hence p l divides both f red (0) and G(0) giving that the factorization f(x) = G(x)f red (x) is a proper factorization of f(x) in Z[[x]] We now deal with the case when the polynomial f(x) = p n + p m γ 1 x + γ 2 x γ d x d, γ d 0, d 2, (32) has a simple root ϱ pz p with v p (ϱ) = l 1 As before, we assume p prime, n 2, m 1, gcd(p, γ 1 ) = 1 or γ 1 = 0, and gcd(p, γ 2,, γ d ) = 1 We also assume n 2m; the case when n > 2m is covered by Proposition 25 Our goal is to prove that f(x) admits a factorization f(x) = ( p l + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 + )( p n l + b 1 x + b 2 x 2 + ) in Z[[x]] (33) Clearly, this factorization is equivalent to the solvability of the infinite system of equations obtained by comparing coefficients We set a 2 = a 3 = = a d 1 = 0 and start by solving the first d equations: p m γ 1 = p l (b 1 + p n 2l a 1 ) γ 2 = p l b 2 + a 1 b 1 γ d 1 = p l b d 1 + a 1 b d 2 γ d = p l (b d + p n 2l a d ) + a 1 b d 1 (34) We set s d = b d + p n 2l a d and replace the last equation by γ d = p l s d + a 1 b d 1 In our next lemma, we solve this finite system of equations and take a first step towards the factorization of f(x) Lemma 35 Under the above assumptions, there exist b 1, b 2,, b d 1 Z, s d Z, and a 1 Z with gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1, such that f(x) = (p l + a 1 x) ( p n l + b 1 x + b 2 x b d 1 x d 1) + p l s d x d
5 FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN Z[[x]] 5 Proof Let ϱ Z p, with v p (ϱ) = l, be the root of f(x) Since n 2m and p n + p m γ 1 ϱ + γ 2 ϱ γ d ϱ d = 0, we must have l m and 2l n Consider the polynomial in Z[x] g d (x) = p (d 2)l γ d p (d 3)l γ d 1 x + p (d 4)l γ d 2 x ( 1) d 2 γ 2 x d 2 + ( 1) d 1 p m l γ 1 x d 1 + ( 1) d p n 2l x d obtained from f(x) via g d ( x) = xd p 2l f(p l /x) We define recursively g k (x) = p(k 1)l γ k+1 g k+1 (x) for k = (d 1), (d 2),, 2 x In particular, g 2 (x) = γ 2 p m l γ 1 x + p n 2l x 2 Solving for g k+1 (x) and taking its derivative, we obtain g k+1(x) = ( g k (x) + xg k(x) ) for every 2 k d 1 (36) Let r = p l /ϱ Z p Then v p (r) = 0 and g d (r) = 0 Moreover, since f (ϱ) 0, we have g d (r) 0 Let θ = v p(g d (r)) Let a 1 Z be a reduction of r mod p (2d 3)l+2θ Thus gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1, g d (a 1 ) 0 (mod p (2d 3)l+2θ ), and v p (g d(a 1 )) = θ (37) Note that the particular choice of p (2d 3)l+2θ is not necessary for this lemma In fact, choosing a reduction of r mod p (d 1)l would suffice here However, the exponent (2d 3)l + 2θ will play a crucial role in the proof of Theorem 39 Since g d (a 1 ) = p (d 2)l γ d a 1 g d 1 (a 1 ), we have that p (d 2)l g d 1 (a 1 ) If we proceed iteratively, we obtain that p (k 1)l g k (a 1 ) for every 2 k d 1 Now that we have a 1, the first equation in (34) gives and the second equation there becomes b 1 = p m l γ 1 p n 2l a 1, γ 2 = p l b 2 + a 1 (p m l γ 1 p n 2l a 1 ) This equation can then be solved with b 2 = p l g 2 (a 1 ) In fact, if we set b k = p (k 1)l g k (a 1 ) for 2 k d 1, and s d = p (d 1)l g d (a 1 ), (38) the integers a 1, b 1, b 2,, b d 1, s d, solve the system (34) and we get the claimed identity f(x) = (p l + a 1 x) ( p n l + b 1 x + b 2 x b d 1 x d 1) + p l s d x d Theorem 39 Let f(x) be a polynomial of the form (32) with n 2m If f(x) has a simple root ϱ Z p with v p (ϱ) = l 1, then f(x) admits a factorization in Z[[x]] of the form (33) Proof We let a 2 = a 3 = = a d 1 = 0 and choose a 1 as in (37) Following the proof of the previous lemma, we can then find integers b 1, b 2,, b d 1, s d, that solve the system (34) If we define s k = b k + p n 2l a k for every k = 2, 3, 4,,
6 6 DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER the remaining equations needed for the factorization of f(x) (obtained by comparing coefficients) can be written as 0 = p l s d+1 + a d b 1 + a 1 b d 0 = p l s d+2 + a d+1 b 1 + a d b 2 + a 1 b d+1 (310) Since b 1 = p m l γ 1 p n 2l a 1, b k = s k p n 2l a k for k 2, and since the polynomial g 2 (x) = γ 2 p m l γ 1 x + p n 2l x 2 satisfies g 2(a 1 ) = (p m l γ 1 2p n 2l a 1 ), we have a k b 1 + a 1 b k = a k g 2(a 1 ) + a 1 s k for every k d This identity allows us to rewrite each equation in (310) as k 1 0 = p l s k+1 a k g 2(a 1 ) + a 1 s k + a j b k+1 j We proceed with an inductive algorithm to find a d+j and s d+1+j for j 0 This will then determine b d+j Together these two sequences of integers provide a solution for (34) and (310), and consequently a factorization of f(x) Base step Choosing a d and s d+1 We consider the next block of d 1 consecutive equations in (310) As mentioned above, these equations can be written as 1 0 = p l s d+1 a d g 2(a 1 ) + a 1 s d j=d 0 = p l s d+2 a d+1 g 2(a 1 ) + a d s 2 + a 1 s d+1 0 = p l s d+3 a d+2 g 2(a 1 ) + a d+1 s 2 + a d s 3 + a 1 s d+2 (311) 0 = p l s 2d 1 a 2d 2 g 2(a 1 ) + a 2d 3 s a d s d 1 + a 1 s 2d 2 The first two equations combined give 0 = p 2l s d+2 p l a d+1 g 2(a 1 ) + p l a d s 2 + a 1 (a d g 2(a 1 ) a 1 s d ) = p 2l s d+2 p l a d+1 g 2(a 1 ) + a d ( g2 (a 1 ) + a 1 g 2(a 1 ) ) a 2 1s d = p 2l s d+2 p l a d+1 g 2(a 1 ) a d g 3(a 1 ) a 2 1s d, (312) because p l s 2 = g 2 (a 1 ) and g 2 (a 1 ) + a 1 g 2(a 1 ) = g 3(a 1 ), cf (36) By combining (312) with the third equation in (311), and using the identities p 2l s 3 = g 3 (a 1 ) and g 3 (a 1 ) + a 1 g 3(a 1 ) = g 4(a 1 ), we then arrive at 0 = p 3l s d+3 p 2l a d+2 g 2(a 1 ) a d+1 p l g 3(a 1 ) a d g 4(a 1 ) + a 3 1s d Continuing this process, using the relations (36) and (38) in each iteration, the system (311) becomes 0 = p l s d+1 a d g 2(a 1 ) + a 1 s d 0 = p 2l s d+2 p l a d+1 g 2(a 1 ) a d g 3(a 1 ) a 2 1s d 0 = p 3l s d+3 p 2l a d+2 g 2(a 1 ) a d+1 p l g 3(a 1 ) a d g 4(a 1 ) + a 3 1s d (313) 0 = p (d 1)l s 2d 1 p (d 2)l a 2d 2 g 2(a 1 ) a d g d(a 1 ) + ( 1) d a d 1 1 s d 1 Observe that bk = s k for k = 2,, d 1
7 FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN Z[[x]] 7 We now set t d = p (d 2)l s 2d 1 p (d 3)l a 2d 2 g 2(a 1 ) a d+1 g d 1(a 1 ) (314) and rewrite the last equation in (313) as 0 = p l t d a d g d(a 1 ) + ( 1) d a d 1 1 s d (315) 0 = p l t d p θ[ a d p θ g d(a 1 ) + ( 1) d 1 a d 1 1 p θ s d ] (316) Since p (2d 3)l+2θ g d (a 1 ) and s d = p (d 1)l g d (a 1 ), cf (37) and (38), we have that p (d 2)l+2θ s d In particular, p θ s d Z Now, since v p (p θ g d (a 1)) = 0, we can choose a d Z such that the expression inside the brackets in (316) is divisible by p (d 1)l+θ We then solve for t d and obtain that t d is divisible by p (d 2)l+2θ Furthermore, from equation (315) we deduce that a d must be divisible by p (d 2)l+θ With a d having been chosen, we go back to the first equation of (313) and solve for s d+1 It follows that, at the very least, p θ s d+1 Note that if d = 2, then s d+1 = s 2d 1 = t d, so the choice of t d in equation (316) already determines s d+1 Inductive step Choosing a d+j, t d+j and s d+1+j Consistent with the above definition of t d, we now let t d+j = p (d 2)l s 2d 1+j p (d 3)l a 2d 2+j g 2(a 1 ) a d+1+j g d 1(a 1 ) Following the pattern in (311), the equation for s 2d can then be written as 0 = p l s 2d a 2d 1 g 2(a 1 ) + a 2d 2 s a d+1 s d 1 + a d b d + a 1 s 2d 1 If we multiply both sides of this equation by p (d 2)l and use the relations (36), (38), and (314), we obtain the equivalent equation 0 = p l t d+1 a d+1 g d(a 1 ) + a 1 t d + p (d 2)l a d b d Repeating this process iteratively, for every j 1, the equation for s 2d+j 1 in the system (310) can be reduced to 0 = p l t d+j a d+j g d(a 1 ) + a 1 t d+j 1 + p (d 2)l R d+j 1, (317) where R d+j 1 = a d b d+j a d+j 1 b d Assume that the numbers a d+i, t d+i and s d+1+i have been chosen for all i with 0 i j 1, in such a way that the corresponding equations are all satisfied, and such that p (d 2)l+2θ t d+i, p (d 2)l+θ a d+i, p θ s d+1+i Note that we then have b d+i as well and, in particular, p θ b d+i for all 0 i j 1 Thus each R d+i is determined and p 2θ R d+i We now proceed to choose a d+j and t d+j Since p θ divides g d (a 1), t d+j 1, and R d+j 1, we can rewrite (317) as 0 = p l t d+j p θ[ a d+j p θ g d(a 1 ) a 1 p θ t d+j 1 p (d 2)l θ R d+j 1 ] without leaving Z Now, as for the base step, we can choose a d+j Z such that the bracket is divisible by p (d 1)l+θ (since v p (p θ g d (a 1)) = 0) We then solve for t d+j and get a number which is divisible by p (d 2)l+2θ From equation (317), it follows that a d+j must be divisible by p (d 2)l+θ Once again, if d = 2 we can stop here since s d+1+j = s 2d 1+j = t d+j To choose s d+1+j we consider two cases If j d 2, the definition of t j+2 gives p (d 2)l s d+1+j = t j+2 + p (d 3)l a d+j g 2(a 1 ) + + a j+3 g d 1(a 1 )
8 8 DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Since the numbers a j+3,, a d+j are all divisible by p (d 2)l+θ, we can solve for s d+1+j in Z, and get that it is divisible by p θ If j < d 2, then d j < 2d 1 and we can use the equations in (311) to solve for s d+1+j More precisely, we consider the equation 0 = p l s d+j+1 a d+j g 2(a 1 ) + a d+j 1 b a d b j+1 + a 1 s d+j Again, the numbers a d,, a d+j are all divisible by p (d 2)l+θ, in particular they are divisible by p l+θ On the other hand, since p (d 2)l+2θ divides s d, an iteration of the equations in (311) gives that each s d+j is divisible by p (d 2 j)l+θ for every 1 j d 2, and therefore p l+θ s d+j for j < d 2 That means, also in this case, we can solve for s d+1+j in Z and obtain p θ s d+1+j Altogether, we have found a d+j, t d+j, s d+1+j Z satisfying the equations under consideration, and such that p (d 2)l+2θ t d+j, p (d 2)l+θ a d+j, p θ s d+1+j This completes the induction and proves the assertion of the theorem In general, having a root in Z p is certainly not necessary for a polynomial to factor in Z[[x]] For instance, f(x) = x + 63x x 3 + x 4 is reducible in Z[[x]], namely f(x) = (7 + 7x + x 2 ) 2, but it has no roots in Z 7 However, as we discuss below, if the polynomial f(x) = p n + p m γ 1 x + γ 2 x γ d x d, γ d 0, is as in Theorem 39, with the additional condition that gcd(p, γ 2, γ 3 ) = 1, then its reducibility in Z[[x]] gives the existence of a root in pz p Note that if n 2m and f(x) is reducible in Z[[x]], then there exist l, a k, b k Z, with 1 l n/2, such that f(x) = ( p l + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 + )( p n l + b 1 x + b 2 x 2 + ) (318) Proposition 319 Let f(x) be a polynomial of the form (32) with n 2m, and such that gcd(p, γ 2, γ 3 ) = 1 If f(x) factors as above, then f(x) has a root ϱ Z p with v p (ϱ) = l In order to prove this proposition, we need the following lemma Lemma 320 If f(x) as above is reducible in Z[[x]], then the factorization (318) can be arranged such that gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1 and a 2 = = a k = 0 for any k 2 Proof From equation (318) we deduce the following equalities: p m γ 1 = p l (b 1 + p n 2l a 1 ), γ 2 = p l (b 2 + p n 2l a 2 ) + a 1 b 1, γ 3 = p l (b 3 + p n 2l a 3 ) + a 1 b 2 + a 2 b 1, which imply that either gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1 or gcd(p, b 1 ) = 1 (since gcd(p, γ 2, γ 3 ) = 1) If 2l < n, then n 2m implies l < m, and so p b 1 Hence gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1 If 2l = n, then the two factors in (318) are exchangeable and we can assume that a 1 is the one relatively prime to p We will proceed by induction in k 2, assuming that gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1
9 FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN Z[[x]] 9 Base step (k = 2): Since gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1, there exist u 1, u 2 Z such that u 1 a 1 + u 2 p l = a 2 If we write f(x) = A(x)B(x) with A(x), B(x) Z[[x]] as in (318), then f(x) = ( (1 + u 1 x + u 2 x 2 )A(x) )( (1 + u 1 x + u 2 x 2 ) 1 B(x) ) Since (1 + u 1 x + u 2 x 2 ) 1 B(x) Z[[x]] and (1 + u 1 x + u 2 x 2 )A(x) = (1 + u 1 x + u 2 x 2 ) ( p l + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 + ) = p l + (a 1 + u 1 p l )x + (a 2 + u 1 a 1 + u 2 p l )x 2 + = p l + c 1 x + c 3 x 3 +, we now have a factorization of f(x) with the desired properties Inductive step: Suppose that (318) can be written as f(x) = A k (x)b(x) with A k (x) = p l + a 1 x + a k+1 x k+1 + a k+2 x k+2 +, B(x) = p n l + b 1 x + b 2 x 2 + Since gcd(p, a k 1) = 1, there exist u 1, u k+1 Z such that ( 1) k 1 u 1 a k 1 + u k+1 p kl = a k+1 p (k 1)l (321) In particular, p (k 1)l u 1 If we let u 2 = p l u 1 a 1, then u 1 a 1 + u 2 p l = 0 and p (k 2)l u 2 For j = 3,, k, we recursively define u j = p l u j 1 a 1 and obtain u j 1 a 1 + u j p l = 0 with p (k j)l u j Finally, we let U(x) = 1 + u 1 x + u 2 x u k+1 x k+1 and write f(x) = ( U(x)A k (x) )( U(x) 1 B(x) ) Observe that U(x) 1 B(x) Z[[x]] Moreover, U(x)A k (x) = (1 + u 1 x + + u k+1 x k+1 ) ( p l + a 1 x + a k+1 x k+1 + ) = p l + (a 1 + u 1 p l )x + (u 1 a 1 + u 2 p l )x 2 + (u 2 a 1 + u 3 p l )x (u k 1 a 1 + u k p l )x k + (a k+1 + u k a 1 + u k+1 p l )x k+1 + By construction, the coefficients of x 2,, x k are all zero, and u k a 1 = ( 1) k 1 p (k 1)l u 1 a k 1 Thus, by (321), the coefficient of x k+1 is also zero and we get U(x)A k (x) = p l + c 1 x + c k+2 x k+2 + as desired Proof of Proposition 319 Let k N with k d By Lemma 320 we can assume that f(x) factors as in (318) with gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1 and a 2 = = a d = = a k = 0
10 10 DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Note that the choice of a 1 depends on k Using the notation s j = b j + p n 2l a j, we then get the equations p m γ 1 = p l s 1, γ 2 = p l s 2 + a 1 (p m l γ 1 p n 2l a 1 ), γ j = p l s j + a 1 s j 1 for 2 j d Solving for s d in terms of a 1 and the coefficients of f(x), these equations give the identity g d (a 1 ) = p (d 1)l s d, where g d (x) is the polynomial g d (x) = ( 1)d x d p 2l f( p l /x) (cf proof of Lemma 35) We also consider the next block of equations 0 = p l s d+1 + a 1 s d 0 = p l s k+1 + a 1 s k Using that gcd(p, a 1 ) = 1, the last equation then gives p l s k This implies p 2l s k 1 = p 3l s k 2 = = p (k d+1)l s d, and therefore g d (a 1 ) 0 (mod p kl ) In conclusion, for every k d we have an integer a 1,k such that g d (a 1,k ) 0 (mod p kl ) By Lemma 28, there exists r Z p such that g d (r) = 0 Moreover, v p (a 1,k ) = 0 implies v p (r) = 0 In particular, 1/r Z p Finally, because of the relation between f(x) and g d (x), it follows that ϱ = p l /r Z p is a root of f(x) with v p (ϱ) = l 4 Examples and further remarks In this section, we intend to illustrate our results for the special cases of quadratic and cubic polynomials We also discuss some particular aspects of the factorization of integer polynomials over Z[[x]] and Z p [x] Once again, the only difficulty is to understand the factorization properties of polynomials of the form (32) Every other case can be treated with Proposition 21 Thus we consider f(x) = p n + p m γ 1 x + γ 2 x 2 + γ 3 x 3, γ 2 + γ 3 0, (41) with p prime, n 2, m 1, gcd(p, γ 1 ) = 1 or γ 1 = 0, and gcd(p, γ 2, γ 3 ) = 1 If n > 2m, everything is said in Proposition 25 If n 2m, we combine Proposition 31, Theorem 39, and Proposition 319 to formulate the following result Theorem 42 Let f(x) be a polynomial of the form (41) with n 2m or γ 1 = 0 Then f(x) admits a factorization f(x) = ( p l + a 1 x + a 2 x 2 + )( p n l + b 1 x + b 2 x 2 + ) in Z[[x]] with 1 l n/2 if and only if it has a root ϱ Z p with v p (ϱ) = l 1
11 FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN Z[[x]] 11 As the polynomials (7+7x+x 2 ) 2 and (7+7x+x 2 )(7+7x+x 3 ) show, Theorem 42 is not necessarily valid for polynomials of degree higher than 3 Observe that neither 7 + 7x + x 2 nor 7 + 7x + x 3 have roots in Z 7 On the other hand, under the assumption that f(x) has a root in Z p, it is indeed necessary to assume that its padic valuation is positive For instance, the polynomial x + 15x 2 + x 3 = (1 + x)(7 + 14x + x 2 ) has 1 as root in Z 7, but it does not admit a proper factorization in Z[[x]] since 1 + x is a unit and x + x 2 is irreducible in Z[[x]] Note that v 7 ( 1) = 0 As discussed in Section 2, the conditions n 2 and m 1 are necessary for Theorem 42 to hold In fact, any power series f with f(0) = 1 is a unit in Z[[x]], and any power series f for which f(0) is a prime number is irreducible in Z[[x]] Moreover, if gcd(p, γ 1 ) = 1, then any power series of the form p n + γ 1 x + is irreducible in Z[[x]] However, the polynomial p n + γ 1 x + γ 2 x 2 is reducible in Z p [x] for every γ 1, γ 2 Z with gcd(p, γ 1 ) = 1 Thus, in general, the reducibility of polynomials in Z[[x]] does not follow from their reducibility in Z[x] or Z p [x] However, in certain cases, the reducibility in Z[[x]] of polynomials of the form p n + d k=1 α kx k is indeed equivalent to their reducibility in Z p [x] Such cases are discussed by JP Bézivin [1] and J Elliott [4] We finish this section with a brief discussion about the factorization of quadratic and cubic polynomials in the presence of a multiple padic root Multiple roots As mentioned at the beginning of Section 3, if f(x) has a multiple root in Z p, then a proper factorization of f(x) in Z[[x]] can be achieved with polynomial factors We now proceed to illustrate what this factorization looks like for the cases at hand Recall that if f(x) has a multiple root then its discriminant must be zero First, if f(x) in (41) is quadratic and has a double root, then p 2m γ1 2 4p n γ 2 = 0 Hence n = 2m, γ 1 is an even number, and f(x) = p n + p m γ 1 x + γ 2 x 2 = (p m + γ1 2 x)2 Consider now f(x) = p n + p m γ 1 x + γ 2 x 2 + γ 3 x 3 as in (41) with γ 3 0, n 2m, and suppose that f(x) has a double root, say ϱ Z p Thus p n + p m γ 1 ϱ + γ 2 ϱ 2 + γ 3 ϱ 3 = 0, p m γ 1 + 2γ 2 ϱ + 3γ 3 ϱ 2 = 0, and so p must divide ϱ 2 (γ 2 + γ 3 ϱ) and ϱ(2γ 2 + 3γ 3 ϱ) Since gcd(p, γ 2, γ 3 ) = 1, we then conclude that p divides ϱ Let l = v p (ϱ) 1 Note that n 2m implies l m and 2l n Moreover, using that 9γ 3 f(ϱ) (3γ 3 ϱ + γ 2 )f (ϱ) = 0, we obtain ϱ = pm γ 1 γ 2 9p n γ 3 2(3p m γ 1 γ 3 γ 2 2 ) Q Write ϱ = b/a with a, b Z such that gcd(a, b) = 1 Then a γ 3 and b p n, hence b = p l and ϱ = p l /a We conclude that f(x) admits the factorization f(x) = (p l + ax) ( p n l + (p m l γ 1 p n 2l a)x + γ3 a x2), which is a proper factorization of f(x) in Z[[x]] References [1] Bézivin, JeanPaul, Unpublished communication, 2010 [2] Birmajer, Daniel, and Gil, Juan B, Arithmetic in the ring of formal power series with integer coefficients, Amer Math Monthly 115 (2008), no 6,
12 12 DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER [3] Birmajer, Daniel; Gil, Juan B, and Weiner, Michael D, Factorization of quadratic polynomials in the ring of formal power series over Z, J Algebra Appl 6 (2007), no 6, [4] Elliott, Jesse, Factoring formal power series over principal ideal domains, preprint, arxiv: v3 [mathac], 2011 [5] Katok, Svetlana, padic analysis compared with real, Mathematics Advanced Study Semesters (Student Mathematical Library, 37) American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007 [6] Serre, JeanPierre, A course in arithmetic, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No 7, Springer Verlag, New YorkHeidelberg, 1973 Department of Mathematics, Nazareth College, 4245 East Ave, Rochester, NY address: Penn State Altoona, 3000 Ivyside Park, Altoona, PA address: Penn State Altoona, 3000 Ivyside Park, Altoona, PA address:
ON HENSEL S ROOTS AND A FACTORIZATION FORMULA IN Z[[X]]
#A47 INTEGERS 4 (204) ON HENSEL S ROOTS AND A FACTORIZATION FORMULA IN Z[[X]] Daniel Birmaer Department of Mathematics, Nazareth College, Rochester, New Yor abirma6@naz.edu Juan B. Gil Penn State Altoona,
More informationON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS
ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS DANIEL RABAYEV AND JACK SONN Abstract. Let f(x) be a monic polynomial in Z[x] with no rational roots but with roots in Q p for
More informationit is easy to see that α = a
21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore
More informationChapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.
Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize
More informationCHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY
January 10, 2010 CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY The set of polynomials over a field F is a ring, whose structure shares with the ring of integers many characteristics.
More informationQuotient Rings and Field Extensions
Chapter 5 Quotient Rings and Field Extensions In this chapter we describe a method for producing field extension of a given field. If F is a field, then a field extension is a field K that contains F.
More informationModern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 4 (Revision 2)
Modern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 4 (Revision 2) Kevin Broughan University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand May 13, 2010 Remainder and Factor Theorem 15 Definition of factor If f (x)
More information7. Some irreducible polynomials
7. Some irreducible polynomials 7.1 Irreducibles over a finite field 7.2 Worked examples Linear factors x α of a polynomial P (x) with coefficients in a field k correspond precisely to roots α k [1] of
More informationminimal polyonomial Example
Minimal Polynomials Definition Let α be an element in GF(p e ). We call the monic polynomial of smallest degree which has coefficients in GF(p) and α as a root, the minimal polyonomial of α. Example: We
More informationPrime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials
Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.
More informationPrimitive Prime Divisors of FirstOrder Polynomial Recurrence Sequences
Primitive Prime Divisors of FirstOrder Polynomial Recurrence Sequences Brian Rice brice@hmc.edu July 19, 2006 Abstract The question of which terms of a recurrence sequence fail to have primitive prime
More information3 1. Note that all cubes solve it; therefore, there are no more
Math 13 Problem set 5 Artin 11.4.7 Factor the following polynomials into irreducible factors in Q[x]: (a) x 3 3x (b) x 3 3x + (c) x 9 6x 6 + 9x 3 3 Solution: The first two polynomials are cubics, so if
More informationJUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 1.8. ALGEBRA 8 (Polynomials) A.J.Hobson
JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER 1.8 ALGEBRA 8 (Polynomials) by A.J.Hobson 1.8.1 The factor theorem 1.8.2 Application to quadratic and cubic expressions 1.8.3 Cubic equations 1.8.4 Long division of polynomials
More information1 = (a 0 + b 0 α) 2 + + (a m 1 + b m 1 α) 2. for certain elements a 0,..., a m 1, b 0,..., b m 1 of F. Multiplying out, we obtain
Notes on realclosed fields These notes develop the algebraic background needed to understand the model theory of realclosed fields. To understand these notes, a standard graduate course in algebra is
More informationSubsets of Euclidean domains possessing a unique division algorithm
Subsets of Euclidean domains possessing a unique division algorithm Andrew D. Lewis 2009/03/16 Abstract Subsets of a Euclidean domain are characterised with the following objectives: (1) ensuring uniqueness
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear
More informationPROBLEM SET 6: POLYNOMIALS
PROBLEM SET 6: POLYNOMIALS 1. introduction In this problem set we will consider polynomials with coefficients in K, where K is the real numbers R, the complex numbers C, the rational numbers Q or any other
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationWinter Camp 2011 Polynomials Alexander Remorov. Polynomials. Alexander Remorov alexanderrem@gmail.com
Polynomials Alexander Remorov alexanderrem@gmail.com Warmup Problem 1: Let f(x) be a quadratic polynomial. Prove that there exist quadratic polynomials g(x) and h(x) such that f(x)f(x + 1) = g(h(x)).
More informationLINEAR RECURSIVE SEQUENCES. The numbers in the sequence are called its terms. The general form of a sequence is. a 1, a 2, a 3,...
LINEAR RECURSIVE SEQUENCES BJORN POONEN 1. Sequences A sequence is an infinite list of numbers, like 1) 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32,.... The numbers in the sequence are called its terms. The general form of a sequence
More informationH/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems
H/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems Ch. 4.1, Problem 5 (a) Find the number of roots of x x in Z 4, Z Z, any integral domain, Z 6. (b) Find a commutative ring in which x x has infinitely many roots.
More informationInteger roots of quadratic and cubic polynomials with integer coefficients
Integer roots of quadratic and cubic polynomials with integer coefficients Konstantine Zelator Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics 212 Ben Franklin Hall Bloomsburg University 400 East Second Street
More informationPolynomials can be added or subtracted simply by adding or subtracting the corresponding terms, e.g., if
1. Polynomials 1.1. Definitions A polynomial in x is an expression obtained by taking powers of x, multiplying them by constants, and adding them. It can be written in the form c 0 x n + c 1 x n 1 + c
More information1 Lecture: Integration of rational functions by decomposition
Lecture: Integration of rational functions by decomposition into partial fractions Recognize and integrate basic rational functions, except when the denominator is a power of an irreducible quadratic.
More informationUnique Factorization
Unique Factorization Waffle Mathcamp 2010 Throughout these notes, all rings will be assumed to be commutative. 1 Factorization in domains: definitions and examples In this class, we will study the phenomenon
More informationFACTORING AFTER DEDEKIND
FACTORING AFTER DEDEKIND KEITH CONRAD Let K be a number field and p be a prime number. When we factor (p) = po K into prime ideals, say (p) = p e 1 1 peg g, we refer to the data of the e i s, the exponents
More informationThe Method of Partial Fractions Math 121 Calculus II Spring 2015
Rational functions. as The Method of Partial Fractions Math 11 Calculus II Spring 015 Recall that a rational function is a quotient of two polynomials such f(x) g(x) = 3x5 + x 3 + 16x x 60. The method
More informationIntroduction to Finite Fields (cont.)
Chapter 6 Introduction to Finite Fields (cont.) 6.1 Recall Theorem. Z m is a field m is a prime number. Theorem (Subfield Isomorphic to Z p ). Every finite field has the order of a power of a prime number
More informationMOP 2007 Black Group Integer Polynomials Yufei Zhao. Integer Polynomials. June 29, 2007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu
Integer Polynomials June 9, 007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu We will use Z[x] to denote the ring of polynomials with integer coefficients. We begin by summarizing some of the common approaches used in dealing
More informationProofs are short works of prose and need to be written in complete sentences, with mathematical symbols used where appropriate.
Advice for homework: Proofs are short works of prose and need to be written in complete sentences, with mathematical symbols used where appropriate. Even if a problem is a simple exercise that doesn t
More informationa 1 x + a 0 =0. (3) ax 2 + bx + c =0. (4)
ROOTS OF POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS In this unit we discuss polynomial equations. A polynomial in x of degree n, where n 0 is an integer, is an expression of the form P n (x) =a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 + + a 1 x
More informationSome facts about polynomials modulo m (Full proof of the Fingerprinting Theorem)
Some facts about polynomials modulo m (Full proof of the Fingerprinting Theorem) In order to understand the details of the Fingerprinting Theorem on fingerprints of different texts from Chapter 19 of the
More informationThe van Hoeij Algorithm for Factoring Polynomials
The van Hoeij Algorithm for Factoring Polynomials Jürgen Klüners Abstract In this survey we report about a new algorithm for factoring polynomials due to Mark van Hoeij. The main idea is that the combinatorial
More informationHOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS. n!f n (1) lim. ln x n! + xn x. 1 = G n 1 (x). (2) k + 1 n. (n 1)!
Math 7 Fall 205 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS Problem. 2008 B2 Let F 0 x = ln x. For n 0 and x > 0, let F n+ x = 0 F ntdt. Evaluate n!f n lim n ln n. By directly computing F n x for small n s, we obtain the following
More information(x + a) n = x n + a Z n [x]. Proof. If n is prime then the map
22. A quick primality test Prime numbers are one of the most basic objects in mathematics and one of the most basic questions is to decide which numbers are prime (a clearly related problem is to find
More informationIntroduction to Algebraic Geometry. Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points
Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points 1. The resultant. Let K be a field. Then the polynomial ring K[x] is a unique factorisation domain (UFD). Another example of a
More informationARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS OF FOUR SQUARES
ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS OF FOUR SQUARES KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Suppose a, b, c, and d are rational numbers such that a 2, b 2, c 2, and d 2 form an arithmetic progression: the differences b 2 a 2,
More informationFactoring Polynomials
Factoring Polynomials Sue Geller June 19, 2006 Factoring polynomials over the rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers has long been a standard topic of high school algebra. With the advent
More informationPYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES KEITH CONRAD
PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction A Pythagorean triple is a triple of positive integers (a, b, c) where a + b = c. Examples include (3, 4, 5), (5, 1, 13), and (8, 15, 17). Below is an ancient
More informationcalculating the result modulo 3, as follows: p(0) = 0 3 + 0 + 1 = 1 0,
Homework #02, due 1/27/10 = 9.4.1, 9.4.2, 9.4.5, 9.4.6, 9.4.7. Additional problems recommended for study: (9.4.3), 9.4.4, 9.4.9, 9.4.11, 9.4.13, (9.4.14), 9.4.17 9.4.1 Determine whether the following polynomials
More information11 Ideals. 11.1 Revisiting Z
11 Ideals The presentation here is somewhat different than the text. In particular, the sections do not match up. We have seen issues with the failure of unique factorization already, e.g., Z[ 5] = O Q(
More informationFactorization in Polynomial Rings
Factorization in Polynomial Rings These notes are a summary of some of the important points on divisibility in polynomial rings from 17 and 18 of Gallian s Contemporary Abstract Algebra. Most of the important
More informationBasics of Polynomial Theory
3 Basics of Polynomial Theory 3.1 Polynomial Equations In geodesy and geoinformatics, most observations are related to unknowns parameters through equations of algebraic (polynomial) type. In cases where
More informationCONTINUED FRACTIONS AND PELL S EQUATION. Contents 1. Continued Fractions 1 2. Solution to Pell s Equation 9 References 12
CONTINUED FRACTIONS AND PELL S EQUATION SEUNG HYUN YANG Abstract. In this REU paper, I will use some important characteristics of continued fractions to give the complete set of solutions to Pell s equation.
More informationCyclotomic Extensions
Chapter 7 Cyclotomic Extensions A cyclotomic extension Q(ζ n ) of the rationals is formed by adjoining a primitive n th root of unity ζ n. In this chapter, we will find an integral basis and calculate
More informationElementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned
CONSTRUCTION OF THE FINITE FIELDS Z p S. R. DOTY Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned solely with questions about the set of integers Z = {0, ±1,
More informationBinary Strings and Graphs
Binary Strings and Graphs Dr. Gregory Hartman, Matthew Green May 21, 2004 1 Introduction Binary strings of length n can be added and permuted. Of special interest is the permutation that cyclicly shifts
More informationCHAPTER 5: MODULAR ARITHMETIC
CHAPTER 5: MODULAR ARITHMETIC LECTURE NOTES FOR MATH 378 (CSUSM, SPRING 2009). WAYNE AITKEN 1. Introduction In this chapter we will consider congruence modulo m, and explore the associated arithmetic called
More information5. Factoring by the QF method
5. Factoring by the QF method 5.0 Preliminaries 5.1 The QF view of factorability 5.2 Illustration of the QF view of factorability 5.3 The QF approach to factorization 5.4 Alternative factorization by the
More informationProblem Set 7  Fall 2008 Due Tuesday, Oct. 28 at 1:00
18.781 Problem Set 7  Fall 2008 Due Tuesday, Oct. 28 at 1:00 Throughout this assignment, f(x) always denotes a polynomial with integer coefficients. 1. (a) Show that e 32 (3) = 8, and write down a list
More informationMath Review. for the Quantitative Reasoning Measure of the GRE revised General Test
Math Review for the Quantitative Reasoning Measure of the GRE revised General Test www.ets.org Overview This Math Review will familiarize you with the mathematical skills and concepts that are important
More informationAlgebra 2. Rings and fields. Finite fields. A.M. Cohen, H. Cuypers, H. Sterk. Algebra Interactive
2 Rings and fields A.M. Cohen, H. Cuypers, H. Sterk A.M. Cohen, H. Cuypers, H. Sterk 2 September 25, 2006 1 / 20 For p a prime number and f an irreducible polynomial of degree n in (Z/pZ)[X ], the quotient
More informationOn the largest prime factor of x 2 1
On the largest prime factor of x 2 1 Florian Luca and Filip Najman Abstract In this paper, we find all integers x such that x 2 1 has only prime factors smaller than 100. This gives some interesting numerical
More information1.5. Factorisation. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style
Factorisation 1.5 Introduction In Block 4 we showed the way in which brackets were removed from algebraic expressions. Factorisation, which can be considered as the reverse of this process, is dealt with
More informationThe Dirichlet Unit Theorem
Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if
More informationThe Division Algorithm for Polynomials Handout Monday March 5, 2012
The Division Algorithm for Polynomials Handout Monday March 5, 0 Let F be a field (such as R, Q, C, or F p for some prime p. This will allow us to divide by any nonzero scalar. (For some of the following,
More informationALGEBRA HANDOUT 2: IDEALS AND QUOTIENTS. 1. Ideals in Commutative Rings In this section all groups and rings will be commutative.
ALGEBRA HANDOUT 2: IDEALS AND QUOTIENTS PETE L. CLARK 1. Ideals in Commutative Rings In this section all groups and rings will be commutative. 1.1. Basic definitions and examples. Let R be a (commutative!)
More informationIntroduction to finite fields
Introduction to finite fields Topics in Finite Fields (Fall 2013) Rutgers University Swastik Kopparty Last modified: Monday 16 th September, 2013 Welcome to the course on finite fields! This is aimed at
More informationMath 319 Problem Set #3 Solution 21 February 2002
Math 319 Problem Set #3 Solution 21 February 2002 1. ( 2.1, problem 15) Find integers a 1, a 2, a 3, a 4, a 5 such that every integer x satisfies at least one of the congruences x a 1 (mod 2), x a 2 (mod
More informationA simple criterion on degree sequences of graphs
Discrete Applied Mathematics 156 (2008) 3513 3517 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Applied Mathematics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dam Note A simple criterion on degree
More information2. Integers and Algorithms Euclidean Algorithm. Euclidean Algorithm. Suppose a and b are integers
2. INTEGERS AND ALGORITHMS 155 2. Integers and Algorithms 2.1. Euclidean Algorithm. Euclidean Algorithm. Suppose a and b are integers with a b > 0. (1) Apply the division algorithm: a = bq + r, 0 r < b.
More informationSign changes of Hecke eigenvalues of Siegel cusp forms of degree 2
Sign changes of Hecke eigenvalues of Siegel cusp forms of degree 2 Ameya Pitale, Ralf Schmidt 2 Abstract Let µ(n), n > 0, be the sequence of Hecke eigenvalues of a cuspidal Siegel eigenform F of degree
More informationFurther linear algebra. Chapter I. Integers.
Further linear algebra. Chapter I. Integers. Andrei Yafaev Number theory is the theory of Z = {0, ±1, ±2,...}. 1 Euclid s algorithm, Bézout s identity and the greatest common divisor. We say that a Z divides
More informationActa Acad. Paed. Agriensis, Sectio Mathematicae 27 (2000) FAST ALGORITHM FOR SOLVING SUPERELLIPTIC EQUATIONS OF CERTAIN TYPES
Acta Acad. Paed. Agriensis, Sectio Mathematicae 27 (2000) 19 24 FAST ALGORITHM FOR SOLVING SUPERELLIPTIC EQUATIONS OF CERTAIN TYPES László Szalay (Sopron, Hungary) Abstract. The purpose of this paper is
More information8 Divisibility and prime numbers
8 Divisibility and prime numbers 8.1 Divisibility In this short section we extend the concept of a multiple from the natural numbers to the integers. We also summarize several other terms that express
More informationIntroduction to polynomials
Worksheet 4.5 Polynomials Section 1 Introduction to polynomials A polynomial is an expression of the form p(x) = p 0 + p 1 x + p 2 x 2 + + p n x n, (n N) where p 0, p 1,..., p n are constants and x os
More informationk, then n = p2α 1 1 pα k
Powers of Integers An integer n is a perfect square if n = m for some integer m. Taking into account the prime factorization, if m = p α 1 1 pα k k, then n = pα 1 1 p α k k. That is, n is a perfect square
More informationON THE FIBONACCI NUMBERS
ON THE FIBONACCI NUMBERS Prepared by Kei Nakamura The Fibonacci numbers are terms of the sequence defined in a quite simple recursive fashion. However, despite its simplicity, they have some curious properties
More informationz = i ± 9 2 2 so z = 2i or z = i are the solutions. (c) z 4 + 2z 2 + 4 = 0. By the quadratic formula,
91 Homework 8 solutions Exercises.: 18. Show that Z[i] is an integral domain, describe its field of fractions and find the units. There are two ways to show it is an integral domain. The first is to observe:
More information3.3. Solving Polynomial Equations. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Solving Polynomial Equations 3.3 Introduction Linear and quadratic equations, dealt within Sections 3.1 and 3.2, are members of a class of equations, called polynomial equations. These have the general
More informationLecture Notes on Polynomials
Lecture Notes on Polynomials Arne Jensen Department of Mathematical Sciences Aalborg University c 008 Introduction These lecture notes give a very short introduction to polynomials with real and complex
More informationU.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra
U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory
More information15. Symmetric polynomials
15. Symmetric polynomials 15.1 The theorem 15.2 First examples 15.3 A variant: discriminants 1. The theorem Let S n be the group of permutations of {1,, n}, also called the symmetric group on n things.
More informationI. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES
I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called
More informationPUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.
PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include
More informationCS 103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 3 Solutions
CS 103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 3 s Exercise 1 (20 points). On wellordering and induction: (a) Prove the induction principle from the wellordering principle. (b) Prove the wellordering
More informationThe Mathematics of Origami
The Mathematics of Origami Sheri Yin June 3, 2009 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Some Basics in Abstract Algebra 4 2.1 Groups................................. 4 2.2 Ring..................................
More informationMATH 4330/5330, Fourier Analysis Section 11, The Discrete Fourier Transform
MATH 433/533, Fourier Analysis Section 11, The Discrete Fourier Transform Now, instead of considering functions defined on a continuous domain, like the interval [, 1) or the whole real line R, we wish
More informationQUADRATIC RECIPROCITY IN CHARACTERISTIC 2
QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY IN CHARACTERISTIC 2 KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let F be a finite field. When F has odd characteristic, the quadratic reciprocity law in F[T ] (see [4, Section 3.2.2] or [5]) lets
More informationa 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + + a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x 2 + + a 2n x n = b 2.
Chapter 1 LINEAR EQUATIONS 1.1 Introduction to linear equations A linear equation in n unknowns x 1, x,, x n is an equation of the form a 1 x 1 + a x + + a n x n = b, where a 1, a,..., a n, b are given
More informationAnswer Key for California State Standards: Algebra I
Algebra I: Symbolic reasoning and calculations with symbols are central in algebra. Through the study of algebra, a student develops an understanding of the symbolic language of mathematics and the sciences.
More information3 Factorisation into irreducibles
3 Factorisation into irreducibles Consider the factorisation of a nonzero, noninvertible integer n as a product of primes: n = p 1 p t. If you insist that primes should be positive then, since n could
More informationPOLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS
POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS RUSS WOODROOFE 1. Unique Factorization Domains Throughout the following, we think of R as sitting inside R[x] as the constant polynomials (of degree 0).
More informationBreaking The Code. Ryan Lowe. Ryan Lowe is currently a Ball State senior with a double major in Computer Science and Mathematics and
Breaking The Code Ryan Lowe Ryan Lowe is currently a Ball State senior with a double major in Computer Science and Mathematics and a minor in Applied Physics. As a sophomore, he took an independent study
More informationSOLVING POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS
C SOLVING POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS We will assume in this appendix that you know how to divide polynomials using long division and synthetic division. If you need to review those techniques, refer to an algebra
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Discrete valuation rings: Dimension 1 Noetherian regular local rings 1 Last day, we discussed the Zariski tangent space, and saw that it
More informationRoots of quadratic equations
CHAPTER Roots of quadratic equations Learning objectives After studying this chapter, you should: know the relationships between the sum and product of the roots of a quadratic equation and the coefficients
More informationInner Product Spaces
Math 571 Inner Product Spaces 1. Preliminaries An inner product space is a vector space V along with a function, called an inner product which associates each pair of vectors u, v with a scalar u, v, and
More informationNotes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan
The General Approach Notes on Factoring MA 26 Kurt Bryan Suppose I hand you n, a 2 digit integer and tell you that n is composite, with smallest prime factor around 5 digits. Finding a nontrivial factor
More informationExplicit inverses of some tridiagonal matrices
Linear Algebra and its Applications 325 (2001) 7 21 wwwelseviercom/locate/laa Explicit inverses of some tridiagonal matrices CM da Fonseca, J Petronilho Depto de Matematica, Faculdade de Ciencias e Technologia,
More informationSettling a Question about Pythagorean Triples
Settling a Question about Pythagorean Triples TOM VERHOEFF Department of Mathematics and Computing Science Eindhoven University of Technology P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands EMail address:
More informationEquations, Inequalities & Partial Fractions
Contents Equations, Inequalities & Partial Fractions.1 Solving Linear Equations 2.2 Solving Quadratic Equations 1. Solving Polynomial Equations 1.4 Solving Simultaneous Linear Equations 42.5 Solving Inequalities
More informationModule MA1S11 (Calculus) Michaelmas Term 2016 Section 3: Functions
Module MA1S11 (Calculus) Michaelmas Term 2016 Section 3: Functions D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 2016 Contents 3 Functions 43 3.1 Functions between Sets...................... 43 3.2 Injective
More informationsome algebra prelim solutions
some algebra prelim solutions David Morawski August 19, 2012 Problem (Spring 2008, #5). Show that f(x) = x p x + a is irreducible over F p whenever a F p is not zero. Proof. First, note that f(x) has no
More informationMATH10040 Chapter 2: Prime and relatively prime numbers
MATH10040 Chapter 2: Prime and relatively prime numbers Recall the basic definition: 1. Prime numbers Definition 1.1. Recall that a positive integer is said to be prime if it has precisely two positive
More informationInterpolating Polynomials Handout March 7, 2012
Interpolating Polynomials Handout March 7, 212 Again we work over our favorite field F (such as R, Q, C or F p ) We wish to find a polynomial y = f(x) passing through n specified data points (x 1,y 1 ),
More informationTheorem (The division theorem) Suppose that a and b are integers with b > 0. There exist unique integers q and r so that. a = bq + r and 0 r < b.
Theorem (The division theorem) Suppose that a and b are integers with b > 0. There exist unique integers q and r so that a = bq + r and 0 r < b. We re dividing a by b: q is the quotient and r is the remainder,
More informationFirst and raw version 0.1 23. september 2013 klokken 13:45
The discriminant First and raw version 0.1 23. september 2013 klokken 13:45 One of the most significant invariant of an algebraic number field is the discriminant. One is tempted to say, apart from the
More informationGeometry and Arithmetic
Geometry and Arithmetic Alex Tao 10 June 2008 1 Rational Points on Conics We begin by stating a few definitions: A rational number is a quotient of two integers and the whole set of rational numbers is
More informationThe cyclotomic polynomials
The cyclotomic polynomials Notes by G.J.O. Jameson 1. The definition and general results We use the notation e(t) = e 2πit. Note that e(n) = 1 for integers n, e(s + t) = e(s)e(t) for all s, t. e( 1 ) =
More information