IMPROVED METHOD FOR SIMULATING TRANSIENTS OF TURBULENT PIPE FLOW


 Stanley Casey
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS 49, 1, pp , Warsaw 2011 IMPROVED METHOD FOR SIMULATING TRANSIENTS OF TURBULENT PIPE FLOW Zbigniew Zarzycki Sylwester Kudźma Kamil Urbanowicz West Pomeranian University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, Szczecin, Poland; The paper presents the problem of modelling and simulation of transients during turbulent fluid flow in hydraulic pipes. The instantaneous wallshearstressonapipewallispresentedintheformofintegralconvolution of a weighting function and local acceleration of the liquid. This weighting function depends on the dimensionless time and Reynolds number. Its original, very complicated mathematical structure is approximated to a simpler form which is useful for practical engineering calculations. The paper presents an efficient way to solve the integral convolution based on the method given by Trikha(1975) for laminar flow. AnapplicationofanimprovedmethodwiththeuseoftheMethodof Characteristic for the case of unsteady flow(water hammer) is presented. This method is characterised by high efficiency compared to traditional numerical schemes. Key words: unsteady pipe flow, transients, waterhammer, efficient numerical simulation Notation c 0 [ms 1 ] acousticwavespeed p[kgm 1 s 2 ] pressure s[s 1 ] Laplaceoperator t[s] time v[ms 1 ] instantaneousmeanflowvelocity t=νt/r 2 [ ] dimensionlesstime
2 136 Z. Zarzycki et al. v[ms 1 ] averagevalueofvelocityincrosssectionofpipe v z [ms 1 ] axialvelocity w[ ] weightingfunction z[m] distancealongpipeaxis L[m] pipelength R[m] radiusofpipe Re=2Rv/ν[ ] Reynoldsnumber µ[kgm 1 s 1 ] dynamicviscosity ν[m 2 s 1 ] kinematicviscosity λ[ ] DarcyWeisbach friction coefficient ρ 0 [kgm 3 ] fluiddensity(constant) τ w,τ wq,τ wu [kgm 1 s 2 ] wallshearstress,wallshearstressforquasisteady flow, unsteady wall shear stress, respectively Ω=ωR 2 /ν[ ] dimensionlessfrequency 1. Introduction There are many problems concerning the issue of unsteady flow in pipes, and they include such phenomena as: energy dissipation, fluidstructure interactions, cavitation(for example column separation) and many others. It would beverydifficult,ifnotimpossible,toaccountforallthephenomenainjustone mathematical model. This paper is devoted to the problem of energy dissipation and it concerns unsteady friction modelling of the liquid in pipes during turbulent liquid pipe flow. The commonly used quasisteady, onedimensional(1d) model in which the wall shear stress is approximated by means of DarcyWeisbach formula is correct for slow changes of the liquid velocity field in the pipe crosssection, i.e. either for small accelerations or for low frequencies(if the flow is pulsating). Theformulaisalsocorrectforthewaterhammereffectforitsfirstwavecycle. Thismodeldoesnottakeintoaccountthegradientofspeedchangingintime, whichisdirectedintotheradialdirection,andso,asaresult,thechanging energy dissipation is not taken into account either. Models which represent unsteady friction losses can be divided into two groups.thefirstarethoseinwhichtheshearstressconnectedwiththeunsteady friction term is proportional to the instantaneous local acceleration(daily et al., 1956; Carrtens and Roller, 1959; Sawfat and Polder, 1973). This group
3 Improved method for simulating transients contains a popular model developed by Brunone et al.(1994, 1995) in which theunsteadyfrictiontermisasumoftwoterms:thefirstofwhichisproportional to the instantaneous local acceleration and the other is proportional to the instantaneous convective acceleration. Vitkovsky et al.(2000) improved Brunone s model by introducing a sign to the convective acceleration. Inthesecondgroupofmodels,theunsteadywallshearstressdependson the past flow accelerations. These models are based on a twodimensional(2d) equationofmotionandtheytakeintoaccountthevelocityfieldwhichcanbe changeable in time in the crosssection of the pipe. Zielke(1968) proposed forthefirsttimealaminarflowmodelinwhichtheinstantaneousshearstress depends on the instantaneous pipe flow acceleration and the weighting function ofthepastvelocitychanges.inthecaseofunsteadyturbulentflow,modelsof friction losses are mainly based on the eddy viscosity distribution in the crosssection of the pipe determined for a steady flow. The following models should be listed: two and three region models(vardy, 1980; Vardy and Brown, 1995, 1996, 2003, 2004, 2007; Vardy et al. 1993) and as well as Zarzycki s fourlayer model(zarzycki, 1993, 1994, 2000). Lately, Vardy and Brown(2004) used an idealised viscosity distribution model for a rough pipe flow. Unsteady friction models are used for simulation of transients in pipes. The traditional numerical method of unsteady friction calculation proposed byzielke(1968),requiresalargeamountofcomputermemoryandistime consuming. Therefore, Trikha(1975) and then Suzuki(1991) and Schohl(1993) improved Zielke s method making it more effective. In the case of unsteady turbulent flow, Rahl and Barlamond(1996) and then Ghidaoui and Mansour(2002) used Vardy s model to simulate the waterhammer effect. These methods provide only approximated results. They are not very effective and cannot be considered to be satisfactory. Theaimofthepresentpaperistodevelopaneffectivemethodofsimulating shear stress for unsteady turbulent pipe flow, a method that would be similar to that proposed by Trikha and Schoohl for laminar flow. That also involves developing an approximated model of the weighting function, which can be useful for effective simulation of transients. 2. Equations of unsteady turbulent flow Unsteady, axisymmetric turbulent flow of a Newtonian fluid in a long pipe with a constant internal radius and rigid walls is considered. In addition, the following assumptions are made:
4 138 Z. Zarzycki et al. constant distribution of pressure in the pipe crosssection, body forces and thermal effects are negligible, mean velocity in the pipe crosssection is considerably smaller than the speedofsoundinthefluid. The following approximate equation, presented in the previous papers by Ohmi et al.( , 1985), Zarzycki(1993), which omits small terms in the fundamental equation for unsteady flow and in which the Reynolds stress termisdescribedbyusingeddyviscosityν t,isused v z t = 1 p ρ 0 z +ν 2 v ( z Σ r 2 + r ν ) Σ r +ν Σ vz r r (2.1) wherev z,p averagedintime,respectively:velocitycomponentintheaxial directionandpressure, ρ 0 densityoftheliquid(constant), t time, z distancealongthepipeaxis,r radialdistancefromthepipeaxis. Themodifiededdyviscositycoefficient ν Σ isthesumofthekinematic viscositycoefficientνandtheeddyviscositycoefficientν t,thatis ν Σ =ν+ν t (2.2) Itisassumedthatchangesofthecoefficientν t resultingfromtheflowchange intimearenegligible,whichmeansthat ν t isonlyafunctionoftheradial distance r. In practice, this limits the analysis to relatively short periods of time Turbulent kinematics viscosity distributions Inordertodescribethedistributionoftheturbulentviscositycoefficientν t throughout the pipe crosssection, the flow region is divided into several layers and,foreachofthem,thefunctionν t (r)hastobedetermined.byanalogy to steady pipe flow, the following regions of flow can be distinguished: VS (Viscous Sublayer), BL(Buffer Layer), DTL(Developed Turbulent Layer) and TC(Turbulent Core)(Hussain and Reynolds(1975)). This is shown in Fig.1.ThedistributionofeddyviscositypresentedinFig.1wascreatedon thebasisofexperimentaldataofthecoefficient ν t providedbylaufer(for Re= )andnunner(forre= )andpublishedbyhinze(1953)as wellasdataaboutaregionclosetothewall,whichwasprovidedbyschubauer and published by Hussain and Reynolds(1975). That was presented in depth by Zarzycki(1993, 1994).
5 Improved method for simulating transients Fig.1.Schematicrepresentationofthefourregionmodelofν t Theradialdistancesr 1,r 2 andr 3 fromthepipecentrelineareasfollows r j =R y(y j + ) j=1,2,3 y 1 + =0.2R+ y 2 + =35 y+ 3 =5 (2.3) where: y + =yv /νisthedimensionlessdistance y, y distancefromthe pipewall,v = τ ws /ρ 0 dynamicvelocity,τ ws wallshearstressforsteady flow,r + =Rv /ν dimensionlessradiusrofthepipe. Thecoefficientofturbulentviscosity ν t isexpressedforparticularlayers (except the buffer layer) as follows ν t =α i r+β i i=1,3,4 α 1 =0 α 3 = ν t1 ν t2 r 2 r 1 α 4 =0 (2.4) β 1 =0 β 2 =ν t2 α 3 r 2 β 4 =ν t1 Forthebufferlayer(r 2 r<r 3 ),ν t isexpressedasfollows ν t =0.01(y + ) 2 ν (2.5) Expressions,whichdefinethequantitiesν t1,ν t2,r 1,r 2 andr 3 havethefollowing forms ν t1 =0.016 v 2 ν ν t2 =12.25ν (2.6) and r 1 =0.8 r 2 = ( ) v R r 3 = (1 20 2) v R (2.7)
6 140 Z. Zarzycki et al. Thequantitiesν t1,r 2 andr 3,whichdefinethedistributionofthecoefficientν t, dependonadimensionlessdynamicvelocity v,whichisdeterminedinthe following way v = 4 2R v = λ s Re s (2.8) ν where:λ s isthefrictioncoefficientforsteadyflow,re s =2Rv s /ν Reynolds numberforsteadyflow,v s meanfluidvelocityinthepipecrosssection. Sincewehave λ s =λ s (Re s )then,forsmoothpipes,theprofileofthe coefficientν t inthepipecrosssectiondependsonlyonthere s number. However,if insteadofthere s weassumetheinstantaneousreynolds number Re = 2Rv/ν (v instantaneous, averaged in the pipe crosssection fluidvelocity)and insteadofλ s weassumeaquasisteadyfrictioncoefficientλ q =λ q (Re),thenthepresenteddistributionofthecoefficientν t will becomeaquasisteadyone.inthispaperλ q isdeterminedfromtheprandtl formula 1 =0.869ln(Re λ q ) 0.8 (2.9) λq 2.2. Momentum equations for particular layers For the fourlayer model of the flow region, equation(2.1) breaks up into four equations. Introducing the differential operator D = / t into equation (2.1), we obtain: for the viscous sublayer Dv z1 = 1 ρ 0 p z +ν ( 2 v z1 r r v ) z1 r (2.10) fortheremaininglayersoftheflowregion Dv zi = 1 p ρ 0 z +ν 2 v ( zi Σ r 2 + νσ ) r +ν Σ vzi r r (2.11) where:i=2,3,4 (i=2forthebl, i=3forthedtland i=4forthe TC),v zi istheaxialcomponentofthevelocityforparticularlayersoftheflow region,ν Σ =ν+ν t effectivecoefficientofturbulentviscosity. Equations(2.10)and(2.11)(fori=3,4)canberesolvedusingrelationship (2.4) into the modified Bessel equations. Equation(2.11)(for i = 2), taking into account the fact that
7 Improved method for simulating transients r R r 1 2 for r 2 r<r 3 (2.12) assumes the form of a differential equation of Euler type. The solutions to the momentum equations for particular layers are shown in papers(zarzycki, 1993, 1994, 2000). 3. Wall shear stress and weighting function Integratingequation(2.1)overthepipecrosssection(fromr=0tor=R) andconsideringthat / t=d,weobtain ρ 0 Dv+ p z +2 R τ w=0 (3.1) Bydeterminingthewallshearstressatthepipewallτ w asfollows τ w = ρ 0 ν v z1 r we obtain a relationship of the following type (3.2) r=r τ w =f(d,re) p z (3.3) Equations(3.1)and(3.3)enableonetodeterminetransferfunctionĜτvthat describes hydraulic resistance, relating the pipe wall shear stress and the mean velocity Ĝ τv ( D,Re)= τ w v (3.4) where v=(r/ν)v, τ w =[R 2 /(ρ 0 ν 2 )]τ w, p=[r 2 /(ρ 0 ν 2 )]pdenotedimensionless velocity, wall shear stress, and pressure, respectively. AprecisemathematicalformofthetransferfunctionĜτvisverycomplex and was presented by Zarzycki(1994). Thequantity D=(R 2 /ν) / tpresentsthedimensionlessdifferentialoperator. Takingintoaccounttransferfunction(3.4)for D=ŝ(whereŝ=sR 2 /ν isthedimensionlesslaplaceoperator)onecanexpressthestress τ w asa sumofquasisteadywallshearstressτ wq andintegralconvolutionofthefluid acceleration v/ t and the weighting function w(t), i.e. as a convolution of
8 142 Z. Zarzycki et al. the fluid acceleration v/ t and the step response g(t)(zielke, 1968; Zarzycki, 1993, 2000), i.e. τ w (t)=τ wq + 2µ R whereτ wq isdescribedbythefollowingexpression t 0 v (u)w(t u)du (3.5) t τ wq = 1 8 λ qρ 0 v v (3.6) The graph of weighting function w(t) for different Reynolds numbers and for thelaminarflowispresentedinfig.2. Fig. 2. The weighting functions for turbulent and laminar flow The weighting function approaches zero when time tends to infinity. This tendency becomes stronger for higher Reynolds numbers. 4. Approximated weighting function model Theweightingfunctionhasacomplexmathematicalformanditisnotvery useful to calculate and simulate unsteady turbulent flow(zarzycki, 1994, 2000). Zarzycki(1994) approximated it to the following form
9 Improved method for simulating transients w apr =C 1 t Ren (4.1) wherec= ,n= However, numerical calculations that include this function lead to some complications(dividing by zero) as time and the Reynolds number are to be found in the denominator. Hence, in order to improve the effectiveness of calculations, the function will be approximated with a simpler form. Additionally, it is suggested that the approximated function should meet the following assumptions: 1) its form should be similar to Trikha s(trikha, 1975) or Schohl s(schohl, 1993) models(methods of simulating shear stress based on these models are very effective), 2) its mathematical form should allow an easy way of carrying out Laplace transformation. This is important for simulating oscillating or pulsating flow by the matrix method(wylie and Streeter, 1993). In order to meet the above presented criteria, a number of possible forms of the function were investigated. The form which was eventually selected can begivenby n w N ( t)=(c 1 Re c2 +c 3 ) A i e b i t (4.2) wherei=1,2,...,n. Determining the coefficients of the weighting function was carried out in two stages in the following way: a)thefirststage.intherangeofthereynoldsnumbersre ,10 7, a several equally distributed points were chosen, and for each of them weighting functions were estimated using Statistica programme. Estimationwasconductedfortherangeofdimensionaltime t 10 6,10. b) The second stage. Twodimensional weighting function w( t, Re) was estimated using Matlab s module for optimization. For the optimization procedure, the following assumption was formulated: todeterminethedecisionvariablesvector x=[x 1,x 2,...,x 19 ], where: x 1 =c 1,x 2 =c 2,x 3 =c 3,x 4 =A 1,x 5 =b 1,x 6 =A 2, x 7 =b 2,...,x 18 =A 8,x 19 =b 8 (arecoefficientsof(4.2)) i=1 which minimizes the vector objective function minf(x)=[f(x)] (4.3)
10 144 Z. Zarzycki et al. where r ( w N(i) ( t,re) w i ( t,re) ) 2 f(x)= (4.4) i=1 w i ( t,re) and satisfies the following limitation g(x)= 10 7 [ ] w N ( t,re)d t dre [ ] w( t,re)d t dre= (4.5) Inrelation(4.4)thearguments tandrewereselectedsothatthedetermined points(pairs of numbers) on the plane t Re would uniformly cover the interval t 10 5,10 1 andre= ,10 7,andthattheywouldbedifferentfrom thepointsselectedatthefirststage.atotalofr=1000pointswereusedin the calculations. The values of coefficients in Eq.(4.2), determined at the first stage, were used as the starting points(the values of elements of the decision variables vector) for the optimization. Once the optimization problems were formulated in the way described above, calculations were conducted using Matlab and its function fgoalattain. Details of the whole process of a new weighting function estimation were described by Zarzycki and Kudźma(2004). On the basis of the above assumptions and calculations that were conducted later, the final form of the weighting function was established 8 w N ( t)=(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 ) A i e b i t i=1 (4.6) c 1 = ;c 2 = ;c 3 = ;A 1 =0.224,A 2 =1.644, A 3 =2.934,A 4 =5.794,A 5 =11.28,A 6 =19.909,A 7 =34.869,A 8 =63.668; b 1 = ,b 2 =8.44,b 3 =88.02,b 4 =480.5,b 5 =2162,b 6 =8425, b 7 =29250,b 8 = The present form of the weighting function contrary to the one put forward in(zarzycki and Kudźma, 2004) contains eight terms. As it turned out, the effective method of calculating wall shear stress presented later in this work is more sensitive to inaccurate fit between the proposed function and the original. Therefore, in order to ensure correct mapping, the number of elements of the new weighting function was increased from six to eight. In addition, a comparison was made of new expression(4.6) course and Zarzycki s model with the weighting function of Vardy and Brown(2003)
11 Improved method for simulating transients w( t)= 1 2 π t exp ( t C ) (4.7) where:c =12.86/Re κ ;κ=log 10 (15.29/Re ). The accuracy of Zarzycki s mapping of the weighting function by the new function is as follow: ForarangeofReynoldsnumbersbetween Re 10 7 and dimensionlesstimebetween10 5 t 10 1,therelativeerrorsatisfies condition w N( t) w( t) 0.05 w( t) Graphical comparison of the newly estimated function and models of weighing function by Zarzycki and VardyBrown are presented in Fig. 3. The relative errorofthenewfunctionandzarzycki smodelispresentedinfig.4.asitis shown,theerrorinsomeareasisupto5%butithastobementionedthatthe run of the new function is between the models of VardyBrown and Zarzycki weighting functions. There is no clear evidence of better consistency with the experimentforawiderangeofreynoldsnumbersuptonow,soitisambiguous which models should be mapped more precisely by the new function. The authors did not want to complicate the form of weighting expression through an increase of the number of exponential components thus left it in form(4.6). But,itisworthtomentionthatitispossibletoincreaseaccuracyofmapping the original weight in a wider range of Reynolds numbers or dimensionless time in the case of new more precise and experimentally tested models. The lowest limit of usage of the new weighting function for dimensionless timeis t=10 5.Forthepresentedmethodoftransientssimulationsitisa satisfactory value from the point of engineering view. It permit simulations of low viscosity fluids in quite large pipe radius(e.g. for fluid which viscosity ν=1mm 2 /sacceptablediameter=0.3m).ithastobealsomentionedthat suchabigradiusofthepipelinehasusuallylonglength,whatmeans,in consequence, low frequency of transients pressure oscillations. It allows one to take a quite big time step in numerical calculations, which is in the acceptable range of dimensionless time. In order to quantitatively assess a mapping of Zarzycki s model by the new expression for selected Reynolds numbers, a relative error is calculated according to the expression relative error = w N( t) w( t) (4.8) w( t)
12 146 Z. Zarzycki et al. Fig. 3. Comparison of VardyBrown s, Zarzycki s and new weighting function runs fordifferentreynoldsnumbers:(a)re=10 4,(b)Re=10 6 Fig. 4. The relative error between the new function and Zarzycki s weighting functionmodelforre=10 4 ResultsofitsusageareshownforthecaseofReynoldsnumberRe=10 4 in Fig. 4. In the case of harmonically pulsating flow, a transfer matrix method is usually used(wylie and Streeter, 1993). For this method, an adequate(laminar or turbulent) weighting function transformed into Laplace domain is needed.
13 Improved method for simulating transients Next,theLaplacevariableissubstitutetbyŝ=jΩ. Conducting the above mentioned transformations, the new weighting function takes the following form w N (jω)=(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 ) 8 i=1 A i jω+b i (4.9) where:ω=ωr 2 /νisthedimensionlessangularfrequency. InFig.5,acomparisonofrealandimaginarypartsofnewweightingfunction(4.9) with Zarzycki and VardyBrown models is presented. Fig. 5. Comparison of the new weighting function with models by Zarzycki and VardyBrownforRe=10 4 To sum up, it should be pointed out that new approximating function(5.3) well reflects the weight of the unsteady friction model for turbulent flow for t 10 5 and 2000 Re 10 7.However,asfarasfrequencyisconcerned, thepresentedrelationisrightforadimensionlessfrequencyω 10.These particular ranges are most important as far as engineering applications and precision of numerical simulations are concerned. 5. Improvement of the approximation method for simulations of wall shear stress Numerical calculations of the unsteady wall shear stress(convolution of the local liquid acceleration and the weighting function) in the traditional approach is both timeconsuming and takes a lot of computer memory space(suzuki et al., 1991). In papers by Trikha(1975) and Schohl(1993) another, more efficient method of calculating unsteady shear stress for laminar flow was presented.
14 148 Z. Zarzycki et al. This section presents the implementation of Trikha s method into calculationsofwallshearstressforturbulentflowusingthedevelopedhereformof weighting function(4.6). Weighting function(4.6) can be given by 8 w N (t)= w i (5.1) i=1 wherew i =(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 )A i e b iνt/r 2. Using the above form of the weighting function, the unsteady term of pipe wallshearstressτ wn canbewrittenas τ wu = 2µ R 8 y i (t) (5.2) i=1 where t y i (t)=(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 )A i e b i ν R 2t 0 e b i ν R 2u v (u)du (5.3) u TheReynoldsnumberwasusedintheaboveexpressionsasavariabletobe updated at every iterative step. This approach was also suggested by Vardy etal.(1993). Because in the characteristics method calculations are carried out for some fixed time intervals, then y i (t+ t)= t+ t 0 w i (t+ t u) v u (u)du= t =e b i ν R 2 t (c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 )A i e b i ν R 2t e b i ν R 2u v } 0 {{ } y i (t) +(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 )A i e b i ν t+ t R 2(t+ t) e b i ν R 2u v u (u)du } {{ t } y i (t) While comparing relations(5.4) and(5.3), we obtain u (u)du + (5.4) y i (t+ t)=y i (t)e b i ν R 2 t + y i (t) (5.5)
15 Improved method for simulating transients where y i (t)=(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 )A i e b i ν t+ t R 2(t+ t) e b i ν R 2u v t (u)du (5.6) u Ifintheabovegivenexpressiondescribing y i (t),weassumethatv(u)is alinearfunction [v(u) =au+b]intheintervalfrom tto t+ t,then its derivative calculated after time given by v(u)/ u can be treated as a constant whose value can be determined from the following expression: [v(t+ t) v(t)]/ t.onthestrengthofthisassumption,wecanwrite y i (t) (c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 )A i e b i ν R 2(t+ t) [v(t+ t) v(t)] t =(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 )A i e b i ν R 2(t+ t) [v(t+ t) v(t)] t b i ν =(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 ) A ir 2 tb i ν y i (t+ t) y i (t)e b i ν R 2 t + R 2 t+ t e b i ν R 2u du= t (e b i ν R 2(t+ t) e b i ν R 2t) = (1 e b i ν R 2 t) [v(t+ t) v(t)] (5.7) (5.8) +(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 ) A ir 2 (1 e b i ν R tb i ν 2 t) [v(t+ t) v(t)] τ wu (t+ t)= 2µ 8 y i (t+ t) (5.9) R τ wu (t+ t) 2µ R i=1 8 i=1 +(c 1 Re c 2 +c 3 ) A ir 2 tb i ν y i (t)e b i ν R 2 t + (1 e b i ν R 2 t) [v(t+ t) v(t)] (5.10) Atthebeginningofsimulations(i.e.atthefirstiterativestep),thevalueofall termsofy i (t)equalszero.ateverysubsequenttimestep,thesevalueschange according to Eq.(5.5).
16 150 Z. Zarzycki et al. 6. Results of waterhammer simulations and efficiency of the method 6.1. Governingequations The unsteady flow, accompanying the water hammer effect, may be described by a set of the following partial differential equations(wylie and Streeter, 1993): equation of continuity p v t +c2 0ρ 0 =0 (6.1) x equation of motion v t +1 p ρ 0 x + 2τ =0 (6.2) ρ 0 R wherev=v(x,t)istheaveragevelocityofliquidinthepipecrosssection, p=p(x,t) averagepressureinthepipecrosssection, R innerradiusof thetube,τ wallshearsterss,ρ 0 densityoffluid,c 0 velocityofpressure wavepropagation,t time,x axiallocationalongthepipe. A waterhammer simulation is carried out by the method of characteristics (MOC). This method(for small Mach number flow) transform equations(6.1), (6.2) into the following systems of equations(wylie and Streeter, 1993) if ±dp±ρ 0 c 0 dv+ 2τ wa dt=0 (6.3) R dz=±c 0 dt (6.4) Details of the further procedure of calculation may be found in papers by Zarzycki and Kudźma(2004) or Zarzycki et al.(2007) Numericalsimulation The investigated system(tankpipelinevalve) is presented in Fig. 6. For calculations, the following data were assumed(wichowski, 1984): lengthofhydrauliclinel=3600m innerdiameteroftubed=0.62m thicknessoftubewallg=0.016m modulusofelasticityoftubewallmaterial(castiron)e= Pa bulkmodulusofliquide L = Pa
17 Improved method for simulating transients Fig.6.Schemeofthepipelinesystem;1 hydraulicpipeline,2 cutoffvalve, 3 tank,v 0 directionoffluidflow(initialcondition) velocityofpressurewavepropagationc 0 =1072m/s initialvelocityoffluidflowv 0 =1.355m/s densityofwaterρ 0 =1000kg/m 3 kinematicviscosityoffluidν= m 2 /s The critical Reynolds number is calculated according to the following equation(ohmi et al., 1985) Re c =800 Ω (6.5) whereω=ωr 2 /νisthedimensionlessangularfrequency;ω=2π/t angularfrequency; T =4L/c 0 periodofpressurepulsation, L lengthof pipe. ThevalueofReynoldsnumberattheinitialconditionisRe=2Rv 0 /ν= ,thecriticalReynoldsnumberaccordingtoEq.(6.5)Re c = , so(re>re c )andtheflowisregardedasturbulent. Theunsteadystateofthesystemwasachievedbyacompleteclosureof thevalveforatimelongerthanahalfofthewave speriodinthepipe,i.e. t z =90s>2L/c 0 =6.72s,consequentlyitcanberegardedasanexample of a complex waterhammer(wylie and Streeter, 1993). Closure of the valve proceeded according to the characteristics presented in Fig. 7(Wichowski, 1984).ThepresentedcharacteristicsillustratethevariableliquidflowrateQ z through the valve due to its slow shutdown. Two simulation cases were investigated: inthefirstone,theunsteadystressτ wu wascalculatedbymeansofeq. (5.10) by making use of new weighting function(4.6), inthesecondone,theunsteadystress τ wu wascalculatedusingthe traditional method(zielke, 1968). Theresultsofnumericalsimulationatthevalvecarriedoutforagiven numberoftimestepsispresentedinfig.8.asonecansee,afterthevalve
18 152 Z. Zarzycki et al. Fig. 7. Flow characteristics of closing of the water supply valve closure which lasts 90s, there are still evident significant pressure pulsations. Thiseffectiscausedbyverylargeinertiaoftheliquid(highvalueofthe Reynolds number and a substantial length of the liquid line). Therefore, despite the long time of valve closure, disappearing pressure pulsations are still present intheline. Fig. 8. Pressure fluctuation at the valve after its closure The comparison of two simulations, using the old and new method of calculations of unsteady frictional losses presented in Fig. 8 shows a good agreement of the results obtained, and thus confirms that the model of efficient computation satisfactorily replaces the traditional method. However, an important difference that can be observed in the simulations is the time of numerical calculations. Figure 9 presents the dependence of timenecessarytocarryoutcalculationsonthenumberoftimestepsusedfor the simulations. As it can be clearly seen, the time of numerical calculations carried out by means of the traditional method using Zarzycki s weighting function(4.1) is much longer than that used to calculate it using the presented
19 Improved method for simulating transients Fig. 9. Comparison of numerical computation times method. Moreover, the time necessary to carry out the calculations conducted for the traditional method increases exponentially, along with the increase of the number of time steps. However, for the effective method the time increases slowlyinalinearway. Onthebasisoftheabovepresentedinvestigations,itcanbestatedthatthe presently developed method of simulating pressure changes and flow velocity, while taking into account the unsteady friction loss expressed by(5.10), is an effective method which can replace the tradition method and which offers satisfactory accuracy. 7. Conclusions The paper presented the transfer function relating the pipe wall shear stress and the mean velocity. It is based on a fourregion distribution of eddy viscosityatthecrosssectionofthepipe.thismodelwasusedtodeterminethe unsteady wall shear stress as integral convolution of acceleration and weighting function similarly as it was done for laminar flow(see e.g. Zielke, 1968). However, the weighting function has a complex mathematical form and it is not very convenient to use it for simulating transient flows. Therefore, it was approximated to a simpler form, which was a sum of eight exponential summands. For this form of the weighting function and approximated in this way, an effective method of simulating wall shear stress was developed. The most important conclusions which can be drawn from this study are as follows: Theweightingfunctiondependsonthedimensionlesstime t=νt/r 2 (asinthecaseforlaminarflow)andadditionallyonthereynoldsnumber Re.
20 154 Z. Zarzycki et al. The weighting function approaches zero as the time increases. For a given valueofdimensionlesstimeitisgreaterinthecaseoflaminarflowandit decreasesalongwiththeincreaseofreynoldsnumberreinthecaseof turbulent flow. It means that the hydraulic resistance with an increase inthereynoldsnumberregoesfastertoaquasisteadyvalue,whichis associated with increase of damping. Approximated weighting function(4.6) proves to be a precise expression intherange 10 5 t 10 1 and Re 10 7 (relativeerror smallerthan5%). The present approximated method of calculating wall shear stress(which incidentally is similar to Trikha s method developed for laminar flow) makes it possible to significantly reduce the time necessary to carry out calculations as compared with the traditional method. Theweightingfunctiondevelopedinthisstudyshowsagoodfitwith Vardy s model for short times(high frequencies). However, the discrepancy between the values of weighting function obtained in both methods increase together with the increase of Reynolds number. It should bepointedoutthatbothfunctionswereobtainedonthebasisofdetermined distribution of eddy viscosity. This is justified for high frequencies (Brownetal.,1969).Itseemsthatforthemeanbandoffrequenciesanother model would be more appropriate. A model in which eddy viscosity, except for viscous sublayer, would be determined using turbulent kinetic energymodels(e.g.k ε,k l). Theweightingfunctionhasaformwhichcaneasilyundergothefirst Laplace transformation and then Fourier transform. This is useful for determination a frequency characteristics of a long hydraulic pipeline systems. References 1. Abreu J.W., Almeida A.B., 2000, Pressure transients dissipative effects: a contribution for their computational prediction, 8th International Conference on Pressure Surges, BHR Group, The Hague, Netherlands, Bergant A., Simpson A.R., 1994, Estimating unsteady friction in transient cavitating pipe flow, Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. On Water Pipeline Systems, BHRA Group Conf. Series Publ., 10, UK, Edinburgh, May, 215
Axial Flow Compressor Mean Line Design
Axial Flow Compressor Mean Line Design Niclas Falck February 2008 Master Thesis Division of Thermal Power Engineering Department of Energy Sciences Lund University, Sweden Niclas Falck 2008 ISSN 02821990
More informationMean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urbanlike cubical obstacles
BoundaryLayer Meteorol (6) :9 59 DOI.7/s566976 ORIGINAL PAPER Mean flow and turbulence statistics over groups of urbanlike cubical obstacles O. Coceal T. G. Thomas I. P. Castro S. E. Belcher Received:
More informationGuide on How to Develop a Small Hydropower Plant
ESHA 2004 Guide on How to Develop a Small Hydropower Plant The present document is an updated version developed by the Thematic Network on Small hydropower (TNSHP) of the Layman s Guidebook on how to develop
More informationfor some scalar field φ(x, t). The field φ(x, t) is called the potential, or velocity potential, for u.
3 IRROTATIONAL FLOWS, aka POTENTIAL FLOWS Irrotational flows are also known as potential flows because the velocity field can be taken to be the gradient of a 3.1 Velocity potential. That is, an irrotational
More informationLABORATORY TESTS OF ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM
Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport, Vol. 18, No. 1 2011 LABORATORY TESTS OF ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM Jaros aw Konieczny AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Process Control Mickiewicz
More informationControllability and Observability of Partial Differential Equations: Some results and open problems
Controllability and Observability of Partial Differential Equations: Some results and open problems Enrique ZUAZUA Departamento de Matemáticas Universidad Autónoma 2849 Madrid. Spain. enrique.zuazua@uam.es
More informationHighDimensional Image Warping
Chapter 4 HighDimensional Image Warping John Ashburner & Karl J. Friston The Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Contents 4.1 Introduction.................................
More informationNeural Networks as Cybernetic Systems
 Neural Networks as Cybernetic Systems 2 nd and revised edition Holk Cruse Neural Networks as Cybernetic Systems 2 nd and revised edition Holk Cruse, Dr. Department of Biological Cybernetics and Theoretical
More informationReview of the Present Status of Rotor Aerodynamics
WIND ENERGY Wind Energ., 1, 46±69 (1998) Review Article Review of the Present Status of Rotor Aerodynamics H. Snel,* Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Petten, The Netherlands Key words: aerodynamics;
More informationReynolds Number Dependence of Energy Spectra in the Overlap Region of Isotropic Turbulence
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 63: 443 477, 1999. 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 443 Reynolds Number Dependence of Energy Spectra in the Overlap Region of Isotropic Turbulence
More informationTHE TWO major steps in applying any heuristic search algorithm
124 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOL. 3, NO. 2, JULY 1999 Parameter Control in Evolutionary Algorithms Ágoston Endre Eiben, Robert Hinterding, and Zbigniew Michalewicz, Senior Member,
More informationThe Turbulence Problem
Leonardo da Vinci s illustration of the swirling flow of turbulence. (The Royal Collection 2004, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II) The Turbulence Problem An Experimentalist s Perspective Robert Ecke Turbulent
More informationTHE PROBLEM OF finding localized energy solutions
600 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 45, NO. 3, MARCH 1997 Sparse Signal Reconstruction from Limited Data Using FOCUSS: A Reweighted Minimum Norm Algorithm Irina F. Gorodnitsky, Member, IEEE,
More informationON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SPACINGS BETWEEN ZEROS OF THE ZETA FUNCTION. A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey ABSTRACT
ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SPACINGS BETWEEN ZEROS OF THE ZETA FUNCTION A. M. Odlyzko AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey ABSTRACT A numerical study of the distribution of spacings between zeros
More informationMeasurement of ambient fluid entrainment during laminar vortex ring formation
Exp Fluids (8) 44:35 47 DOI.7/s34873979 RESEARCH ARTICLE Measurement of ambient fluid entrainment during laminar vortex ring formation Ali B. Olcay Æ Paul S. Krueger Received: December 6 / Revised:
More informationA handbook prepared under contract for the Commission of the European Communities, DirectorateGeneral for Energy by European Small Hydropower
A handbook prepared under contract for the Commission of the European Communities, DirectorateGeneral for Energy by European Small Hydropower Association (ESHA) The drawing on the cover, published by
More informationAircraft Pitch Control Via Second Order Sliding Technique
Aircraft Pitch Control Via Second Order Sliding Technique A. Levant and A. Pridor Institute for Industrial Mathematics, BeerSheva, Israel R. Gitizadeh and I. Yaesh Israel Military Industries, RamatHasharon,
More informationThe Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests Fischer Black* Deceased Michael C. Jensen Harvard Business School MJensen@hbs.edu and Myron Scholes Stanford University  Graduate School of Business
More informationComparative Study on Frequency and Time Domain Analyses for Seismic Site Response
Comparative Study on Frequency and Time Domain Analyses for Seismic Site Response Ciro Visone, Filippo Santucci de Magistris University of Molise Structural and Geotechnical Dynamic Laboratory STReGa via
More informationOverview of Missile Flight Control Systems
Overview of Missile Flight Control Systems Paul B. Jackson he flight control system is a key element that allows the missile to meet its system performance requirements. The objective of the flight control
More informationA Separation Control CFD Validation Test Case Part 2. Zero Efflux Oscillatory Blowing
43 rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV 25 A Separation Control CFD Validation Test Case Part 2. Zero Efflux Oscillatory Blowing David Greenblatt, * Keith B. Paschal, ChungSheng Yao
More informationA General Correlation for Saturated TwoPhase Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Inside Horizontal and Vertical Tubes
A General Correlation for Saturated TwoPhase Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Inside Horizontal and Vertical Tubes S. G. Kandlikar 1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester,
More informationInterfacial conditions between a pure fluid and a porous medium: implications for binary alloy solidification
J. Fluid Mech. (26), vol. 55, pp. 149 173. c 26 Cambridge University Press doi:1.117/s2211257998 Printed in the United Kingdom 149 Interfacial conditions between a pure fluid and a porous medium: implications
More informationChapter  E ROCK MECHANICS & GEOTECHNICAL APPLICATIONS
Chapter  E ROCK MECHANICS & GEOTECHNICAL APPLICATIONS 454 23 rd Effect of the Stress State on Waterjet Performance in Rock Slotting R. Ciccu, B. Grosso Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationThe Bullwhip Effect is problematic: order variability increases as orders propagate along the supply
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 2004, pp. 150 160 issn 10591478 04 1302 150$1.25 POMS 2004 Production and Operations Management Society An Analytical Investigation of the Bullwhip
More informationFeature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection
Feature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection Tony Lindeberg Computational Vision and Active Perception Laboratory (CVAP) Department of Numerical Analysis and Computing Science KTH (Royal Institute
More informationMISSILES, projectiles, or launchers experience massive
AIAA JOURNAL Vol. 44, No., November 6 ReynoldsAveraged Navier Stokes/LargeEddy Simulations of Supersonic Base Flow Franck Simon, Sébastien Deck, and Philippe Guillen ONERA, 93 Châtillon Cedex, France
More information1 NOT ALL ANSWERS ARE EQUALLY
1 NOT ALL ANSWERS ARE EQUALLY GOOD: ESTIMATING THE QUALITY OF DATABASE ANSWERS Amihai Motro, Igor Rakov Department of Information and Software Systems Engineering George Mason University Fairfax, VA 220304444
More information(1) I. INTRODUCTION (2)
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 19, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2010 3243 Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution and Its Application to Image Segmentation Chunming Li, Chenyang Xu, Senior Member, IEEE,
More informationMEASURING AND ANALYZING LEAKAGE CURRENT FOR OUTDOOR INSULATORS AND SPECIMENS
Measuring Rev. Adv. Mater. and analyzing Sci. 29 (2011) leakage 3153 current for outdoor insulators and specimens 31 MEASURING AND ANALYZING LEAKAGE CURRENT FOR OUTDOOR INSULATORS AND SPECIMENS Dionisios
More information