PE Exam Review - Geotechnical
|
|
- Adam Greene
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PE Exam Reiew - Geotechnical Demonstration Problem Solutions I. Soled Problems Soil Classification.... Phase Relationships Effectie Stress and Stress Distribution Consolidation Strength and Bearing Capacity Earth Retaining Structures Piles Seepage... 8
2 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering Demo Problem Solutions Module 1 - Soil Classification Situation Laboratory gradation analyses and Atterberg Limits were performed on two soil samples. Results are summarized below. No organic odor or materials were noted in either sample. Soil A: U.S. Siee Size Percent Passing No No No No liquid limit (w l ) 35% plastic limit (w p ) % Soil B: U.S. Siee Size Percent Passing No No No No liquid limit (w l ) 37% plastic limit (w p ) 0%
3 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 3 Requirements AASHTO Soil Classification System a Siee analysis: % passing #10 #40 #00 Characteristics of fraction passing #40: W l : Granular materials (35% or less passing #00 siee) Silt-clay material (more than 35% passing #00 siee) A-1 A-3 A- A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A1-a A1-b A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A7-5 A7-6 < 50 < 30 < 15 < 50 < 5 > 51 < 10 < 35 < 35 < 35 < 35 > 36 > 36 > 36 > 36 < 40 > 41 < 40 > 41 < 40 > 41 < 40 > 41 I p : < 6 NP < 10 < 10 > 11 > 11 < 10 < 10 > 11 > 11 1A) What is the classification of Soil A according to the AASHTO System (include the group index)? 1. First, find the plasticity index: I p w l w p I p Use the chart to find the soil group % passing #00 > 35% w l < 40 I p > 11 Soil is in group A-6 3. Find the group index: I F 35)[ ( w 40)] 0.01( F 15)( I 10) g ( 00 l 00 p I ( 51 35)[ (35 40)] 0.01(51 15)(13 10) 4. 8 g Round 4.8 to 4; Soil A is A-6(4)
4 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 4 1B) What is the classification of Soil B according to the AASHTO System (include the group index)? 1. First, find the plasticity index: I p w l w p I p Use the chart to find the soil group % passing #00 < 35% w l < 40 I p > 11 Soil is in group A Find the group index. For A--6 and A--7 soils: I 0.01( F00 15)( I 10) I 0.01(0 15)(17 10) g Round 0.35 to 0; Soil B is A--6(0) g p Unified Soil Classification System b Soil Classification Criteria for assigning group symbols and group names using laboratory tests A Group Symbol Group Name B Course-grained Clean graels: C u > 4 and 1 < C c < 3 E GW Well-graded grael F soils: Graels: > 50% < 5% fines c C u > 4 and/or 1 < C c < 3 E GP Poorly graded grael F More than 50% of course retained on fraction retained #00 siee on #4 siee Fine-grained soils: 50% or more pass the #00 siee Sands: > 50% of course fraction passes #4 siee Silts and Clays: w l < 50 Fines classify as ML or Graels w/ fines: MH GM F, G, H Silty grael > 1% fines c Fines classify as CL or CH GC F, G, H Clayey grael Clean sands: C u > 6 and 1 < C c < 3 E SW Well-graded sand I < 5% fines D C u > 4 and/or 1 < C c < 3 E SP Poorly graded sand I Fines classify as ML or Sands w/ fines: MH SM G, H, I Silty sand > 1% fines D Fines classify as CL or CH SC G, H, I Clayey sand Inorganic I p > 7 and plots on or aboe A line J CL K, L, M Lean clay I p < 4 or plots below A line J ML K, L, M Silt K, L, M, N wl oen dried Organic clay < 0.75 Organic wl not dried OL K, L, M, O Organic silt Silts and Clays: w l > 50 Inorganic Organic I p plots on or aboe A line CH K, L, M Fat clay I p plots below A line MH K, L, M Elastic silt K, L, M, P wl oen dried Organic clay < 0.75 wl not dried OH K, L, M, Q Organic silt Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat
5 A: based on the material passing the 3-in (75-mm) siee B: if field sample contained cobbles or boulders, add with cobbles, boulders, or both to group name C: Graels with 5-1% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM: well-graded grael with silt GW-GC: well-graded grael with clay GP-GM: poorly-graded grael with silt GP-GC: poorly-graded grael with clay D: sands with 5-1% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM: well-graded sand with silt SW-SC: well-graded sand with clay SP-SM: poorly-graded sand with silt SP-SC: poorly-graded sand with clay D60 D30 E: C u C c D10 D10D60 F: If soil contains > 15% sand, add with sand to group name G: If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM or SC- SM H: If fines are organic, add with organic fines to group name I: If soil contains > 15% grael, add with grael to group name J: If Atterberg Limits plot in hatched area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay K: If soil contains 15-9% plus #00, add with sand or with grael, whicheer is predominant L: If soil contains > 30% plus #00, predominately sand, add sandy to group name. M: If soil contains > 30% plus #00, predominately grael, add graelly to group name. N: I p > 4 and plots on or aboe A line O: I p < 4 or plots below A line P: I p plots on or aboe A line Q: I p plots on or aboe A line 1C) What is the classification of Soil A according to the Unified Soil Classification System? 1. Use USCS chart % passing #00 > 50 Fine-grained soils w l < 50 top row no organic odor or color inorganic I p > 4 w l 35; I p 13 plots aboe A line on plasticity chart c Soil A is CL 1D) What is the classification of Soil B according to the Unified Soil Classification System? 1. Use USCS chart % retained on #00 > 50 Course-grained soils % passing #4 > 50 Sands % passing #00 (i.e., % fines) > 1% classify fines according to plot location on plasticity chart c w l 37 I p 0 Plots in region labeled CL or OL fines classify as CL or CH Soil B is SC
6 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 6 Module - Phase Relationships Situation Soil from a borrow pit will be used to construct a 50,000 cubic yard highway embankment. Project specifications require that the fill in the embankment be compacted to at least 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. The material in the borrow pit has the following characteristics: Total Unit Weight: 10.0 pcf Moisture Content: 8.0% Specific Graity of Soil:.66 The Modified Proctor maximum dry density and optimum moisture content are 18 pcf and 13.0%, respectiely. Requirements A) What is the dry unit weight of the material in the borrow pit? 1. Dry unit weight: γ d γ t 1+ w 10. γ d pcf B) What is the oid ratio of the borrow material in the borrow pit? 1. Void ratio: V s V e V Ws G γ s w s W s γ d for 1 ft 3 soil V s V V V e t s
7 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 7 C) In order to meet the specified compaction criteria, what is the minimum dry unit weight of the compacted fill? 1. Maximum dry density 18 pcf. Minimum dry density is 95% of max 3. Minimum dry density pcf D) The minimum number of cubic yards of borrow material required to construct the embankment is approximately: 1. For each cubic foot of compacted fill, you need 11.6 lb of dry soil, but each cubic foot of excaated borrow weighs only lb, so you will need to excaate a larger olume. γ d borrowvborrow γd fillvfill Vborrow , 000 V borrow 73,750 yd 3
8 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 8 E) How many gallons of water must be added per cubic yard of borrow to achiee the Modified Proctor optimum moisture content? Assume no loss of water by eaporation during transport from the borrow pit. 1. Find difference between current and optimum weight of water in borrow material Ww w opt W W w cur W s Ww pcf W w opt w s Ww pcf W w cur. Added water pcf ft 3 3 lb 7 ft gal 18 gal/yd 3 3 yd 8.34 lb F) If the compacted fill in the embankment becomes saturated, what is the moisture content? Assume that the compacted fill does not swell when water is added. 1. Se wgs S 1.0 for saturated soil e 0.49 G s w w 18.4%
9 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 9 G) The borrow material is transported from the borrow pit in dump trucks that can hold 10 cubic yards of material. The aerage total unit weight of the borrow when it is placed in the truck is pcf. The minimum number of truck loads of borrow required to construct the embankment using 50,000 yd 3 is approximately: 1. First find the olume of borrow material that must be transported by truck to fill the embankment. γ d trucksvtrucks γd fillvfill γ t trucks 115 γd trucks w Vtrucks , 000 V trucks 85,446. Diide by the truck capacity 85,446 Truckloads 8,
10 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 10 Module 3 - Effectie Stress and Stress Distribution Situation 1 A subsurface profile consists of a 6 foot layer of sand oerlying 0 feet of clay. The clay is underlain by a grael layer that is at least 50 feet thick. The total unit weights of each of the materials encountered are gien below. Sand Clay Grael Total Unit Weight 10 pcf 115 pcf 140 pcf The ground water leel is at the top of the sand layer. Assume that the total head is the same in the sand and the grael layer. Requirements 3-1A) The total ertical stress at a depth of 8 feet below ground surface is approximately: 1. Total ertical stress is the sum of stresses for each soil layer: σ γ H Sand: psf Clay: psf Grael: psf. σ 3300 psf t 3-1B) The pore water pressure at a depth of 8 feet below the ground surface is approximately: 1. Pore water pressure without seepage: u γ h. u psf w 3-1C) What is the ertical effectie stress at a depth of 8 feet below ground surface?, 1. Vertical effectie stress: σ σ u,. σ psf
11 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering D) What is the total ertical stress at a depth of 8 feet below ground surface if the water leel rises to 4 feet aboe the ground surface? 1. Add stress of extra 4-ft of water to total stress from requirement A. σ γ w h psf σ psf 3-1E) What is the change in the ertical effectie stress at a depth of 8 feet below ground surface if the water leel rises to 4 feet aboe ground surface?, 1. Vertical effectie stress: σ σ u u γ h σ' psf 3. σ' 0 w 3-1F) A 0-foot diameter water storage tank is constructed on the ground surface. The weight of water in the tank exerts a uniform pressure of 1,00 psf on the ground surface. What is the total ertical stress at a depth of 0 feet below ground surface at the center of the tank? Assume the sand and the clay hae the same elastic modulus. 1. Total σ σ from soil + σ from tank σ soil (10 pcf 6 ft) + (115 pcf 14 ft) 330 To find σ tank use the Boussinesq stress contour chart for uniformly loaded circular footings d x z 0 Stress is acting at center of tank, so 0 ; r r 10 I 0.31 (from chart) σ tank Ip foundation psf Total σ psf
12 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 1 Situation A two mile long embankment was constructed for a new highway. The embankment is 1 feet high and 0 feet in width. Due to right-of-way restrictions, retaining walls are used to maintain the width of the embankment at 0 feet for its full height. The total unit weight of the embankment fill is 15 pcf. The embankment is constructed on a sand layer that is more than 100 feet thick. The water table is at a depth of 5 feet below the original ground surface. The total unit weight of the sand is 10 pcf aboe the ground water table and 130 pcf below the water table. Requirements 3-A) The stress increase at a depth of 15 feet under the center of the embankment is approximately: 1. Stress increase: σ I (influence factor from Boussinesq chart) σ total σ γ psf backfill h embankment total From Boussinesq stress contour chart for square footings d : depth 0.75B (width) distance from center 0B so, I σ psf 3-B) How much would the stress due to the embankment increase/decrease if the water table was lowered to 10 feet? 1. As long as the embankment is aboe the water table, raising or lowering water table won t affect the applied stress due to the embankment. The best answer here is It would not change.
13 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 13 Module 4 - Consolidation Situation 1 A soil profile consists of dense sand, 40 feet in thickness, underlain by a 10-foot layer of normally consolidated clay. The clay, in turn, is underlain by relatiely incompressible and impermeable bedrock. The present water table is at the existing ground surface. Ten feet of fill will be placed oer the existing ground surface in a 1,000-foot wide by 1,500-foot long area. The sand has a oid ratio of 0.45 and a specific graity of.67. The sand is saturated below the water table and has a moisture content of 5 percent aboe the water table. The fill has a total unit weight of 15 pounds per cubic foot and a moisture content of 10 percent. The water table will be lowered 0 feet with the addition of the fill material. The clay is saturated, has a specific graity of solids of.70 and a moisture content of 35 percent. The compression index of the clay has been determined to be 0.. The coefficient of consolidation 0.1 square feet per day. Requirements 4-1A) What is the total unit weight of the saturated sand? 1. Saturated unit weight: γ sat ( w Gs + e) γ 1+ e ( )6.4. γ sat pcf B) What is the total unit weight of the moist sand aboe the ground water leel? 1. Total unit weight: γ t ( Gs + S e) γ 1+ e wgs S e 0.45 ( ) 6.4. γ t 10.7 pcf w
14 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering C) What is the total unit weight of the saturated clay? 1. Saturated unit weight: ( ) 6.4. γ sat pcf γ sat (1 + w) γ w + 1 G w s 4-1D) What is the oid ratio of the saturated clay? 1. Se wgs wgs e S 1 4-1E) What is the total settlement in inches of the clay layer due to the combined effect of the imposed fill and lowered water table? 1. Settlement for normally consolidated clay ( σ ' σ' m ): f Cc ρ 1+ e 0 σ' H log σ' Initial stresses at mid-depth in clay σ 1 0 γsandhsand + γclay h psf clay + u γ h w psf 0 σ σ u 3149 psf ' Final stresses at mid-depth in clay σ γ h + γ h f fill fill moistsand moistsand satsand satsand clay clay + γ h + γ h f 0 σ f psf u γ h w psf f σ ' σ u 5373 psf f f f ρ 10 log 0. 6 ft 3.1 in
15 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering F) What is the estimated time required for 50% consolidation of the clay layer? 1. Consolidation time: TH t c d Single drainage, so H d thickness of soil layer 10 ft Read T from Time factor s. Degree of Consolidation chart e. U 50%, so T t 00 days G) How long will it take for 50% consolidation of the clay layer to occur if the clay layer is underlain by sand instead of bedrock? 1. Consolidation time: TH t c d Single drainage, so H d ½ thickness of soil layer 5 ft Read T from Time factor s. Degree of Consolidation chart e. U 50%, so T t 50 days 0.1 Situation A soil profile consists of a10-foot layer of dense sand oerlying an 8-foot layer of normally consolidated clay. The clay is also underlain by dense sand. The groundwater leel is at the ground surface. Also, the total head measured in a piezometer installed in the middle of the clay layer is equal to the existing ground surface eleation. A proposed deelopment requires that 13 feet of fill be placed aboe the existing ground surface. The fill material has a total unit weight of 130 pcf and a moisture content of 1 percent. The saturated unit weight of the sand and clay is 138 pcf and 113 pcf, respectiely. The clay has a specific graity of.68 and a moisture content of 40 percent. The clay has a compression index of 0.0 and a coefficient of consolidation of 0.05 square feet per day.
16 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 16 Requirements 4-A) What is the pore pressure in the center of the clay immediately after placement of the fill layer? Assume that fill placement occurs instantaneously. 1. Pore pressure static + initial excess pore pressures: u u i + u 0 u γ h w psf i u σ γ h psf 0 fill fill. u psf 4-B) Assuming that the total consolidation settlement due to the weight of the added fill is 4.1 inches, how long after the fill is placed can the building be constructed? Assume that the building has no weight 1. Total settlement 4.1 in; allowable settlement 1 in. So, fill must settle 3.1 in before building can be constructed.. Consolidation time: TH t c d Use the Time factor s. Degree of Consolidation chart e to find T. ρt 3.1 U ρ 4.1 For U 76%, T 0.50 There is double drainage, so H d ½ h clay 4 ft c t 160 days 0.05
17 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 17 4-C) What is the pore pressure in the middle of the clay layer 100 days after placement of the fill? Assume fill placement is instantaneous. 1. Pore pressure: u u e + u 0 u psf u e σ ' 1 u u i i u i 1690 psf σ' Use the chart that relates to depth for arious T alues f u z 4 depth 1 (for double drainage) H 4 Use this equation to find T: σ' 0.41 u ue u i i T T 0.31 u e 0.59 u i psf. u psf i TH t c d
18 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 18 Module 5 - Strength and Bearing Capacity Situation A continuous footing is constructed at a depth of 5 feet in a uniform sand deposit. The width of the footing is 10 feet. The sand has total unit weight of 130 pcf and a friction angle (φ) of 37. The depth to groundwater is greater than 100 feet. Assume concentric ertical loading. Use Vesic s bearing capacity factors for all calculations. Requirements 5A) What is the approximate ultimate bearing capacity of the footing? 1. For sand with c 0, bearing capacity: qult 0.5B' γeff Nγ Sγ ssγi + σdnqsqssqi B B e B 0 10 ft gwt > B below footing, so γ eff γ t 130 pcf From table of Bearing Capacity Factors g, for φ 37 : N γ 66 N q 43 Strip footing with concentric ertical load, so: S S S S 1. 0 Sand deposit, so σ ' at bottom of footing D σ u 0, so σ ' σ γ D t psf t. q ult ,850 psf 70,850 lb 1 ton tsf ft 000 lb γ s qs γi qi
19 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 19 5B) What is the approximate ultimate bearing capacity if the bottom of the footing is 10 feet deep? 1. For sand with c 0, bearing capacity: qult 0.5B' γeff Nγ Sγ ssγi + σdnqsqssqi B B e B 0 10 ft gwt > B below footing, so γ eff γ t 130 pcf From table of Bearing Capacity Factors g, for φ 37 : N γ 66 N q 43 Strip footing with concentric ertical load, so: S S S S 1. 0 Sand deposit, so σ ' at bottom of footing D σ u 0, so σ ' σ γ D psf t t. q ult ,800 psf 98,800 lb 1 ton tsf ft 000 lb γ s qs γi qi
20 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 0 5C) What is the bearing capacity if the water table is at ground surface? Assume that the saturated unit weight of sand is equal to 138 pcf. 1. For sand with c 0, bearing capacity: qult 0.5B' γeff Nγ Sγ ssγi + σdnqsqssqi B B e B 0 10 ft γ eff γ sat - γ w From table of Bearing Capacity Factors g, for φ 37 : N γ 66 N q 43 Strip footing with concentric ertical load, so: S S S S 1. 0 Sand deposit, so σ ' at bottom of footing σ σ u D t D σ γ s qs γi qi σ D t γsat u γ w D psf psf σ psf D. q ult ,0 psf 41,0 lb 1 ton tsf ft 000 lb
21 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 1 Module 6 - Earth Retaining Structures Situation A reinforced concrete retaining wall is proposed to support 14 feet of cohesionless sand backfill as shown on the figure below. The sand has a total unit weight of 10 pcf and an angle of internal friction of The unit weight of the concrete is 150 pcf. Assume that the friction angle for shear along the bottom of the wall is Use Rankine s theory to complete the following requirements. Requirements 6A) What is the actie earth pressure coefficient? 1. Actie lateral earth pressure coefficient: φ 30 1 sin 30. K a sin 30 K a 1 sin φ 1+ sin φ 6B) What is the total actie force per foot of wall? 1 1. Actie force: Pa γ th Ka 1. Pa lb 6.4 k 6C) What is the oerturning moment per foot of wall about point A? 1. Oerturning moment: 18. M o k/ft 3 M o P a H 3
22 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 6D) What is the resisting moment per foot of wall about point A, neglecting passie pressure at the toe of the wall? A Diide the wall into 4 rectangular areas, as shown in the figure aboe.. Sum the moments for each of the four areas: M r Σ (F i arm i ) F Aγ Arm ½ d Section H W A γ 18 F (kips) Arm (ft) M (ft-k) Total E) What is the approximate factor of safety against oerturning, neglecting passie pressure at the toe of the wall? 1. Factor of safety: F.S Mr F.S. M 0
23 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 3 6F) What is the approximate eccentricity of the resultant of the ertical and horizontal forces? Wbase 1. Eccentricity: e x Mr M x ΣF o Σ F k x 3.8 ft from point A e ft 6G) What is the factor of safety against sliding without passie earth pressure considered? 1. Factor of safety: s ΣF tan φ s F.S. ΣF 18.1 k φ s 30 s 18.1 tan k F.S s P a
24 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 4 6H) What is the Approximate factor of safety against bearing capacity failure? Use Meyerhof s bearing capacity and correction factors. 1. Factor of safety: F.S. Q ΣF ult Q ult q ult B For sand with c 0, bearing capacity: q 0.5B' γ N S S + σ N S S ult eff γ γs γi D q qs qi B B e ft γ eff 10 pcf From graph of Bearing Capacity Factors g, for φ 30 : N γ 15.7 N q 18.4 For strip footing: S S 1. 0 γ s qs For inclined load: S γ i 1 P θ arctan 19. ΣF a o 5 θ φ 19.5 Sγ i θ For inclined loading: Sqi Sand deposit, so σ ' at bottom of footing σ D D σ psf q ult ,96 psf Q ult ,850 psf k F.S
25 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 5 Module 7 - Piles Situation A bridge is proposed to span a rier. The bridge piers will be supported on 1 diameter, steel, closed-end pipe piles (concrete-filled) drien into the medium-dense sand rier bottom. The water in the rier is 15 feet deep. Laboratory tests indicate that the sand has the following properties: specific graity G s.67; oid ratio, e 0.60 The results of a pile load test on a 1 steel pipe pile drien 15 feet into the sand indicated that the unit skin friction on the test pile at a depth of 10 feet into the sand was 350 psf at failure. Also, the ultimate end bearing capacity of the test pile was estimated to be 3.0 kips. Neglect the structural capacity of the pile and settlement in answering the following questions. Requirements 7A) What is the saturated unit weight of the sand? γ 1. Saturated unit weight: ( w Gs + e) γ sat 1+ e G s.67 e ( ). γ sat 17.5 pcf
26 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 6 7B) The ultimate skin friction capacity of a pile embedded 5 ft into the sand rier bottom is approximately: 1. You need the unit skin friction to find the ultimate friction capacity. You know the skin friction for the pile test at 10 feet is 350 psf. f Kσ ' tan δ, so s 350 K tan δ ' σ effectie stress at 10 ft: σ ' σ u σ γ w h w + γ sat h sat σ psf u γ h w w 1560 psf σ ' psf 350 K tan δ f 0.538σ ' s. Now you need the effectie stress at 15 ft: σ ' σ u σ γ wh w + γsathsat σ psf u γ h psf w w σ ' psf 3. So, unit skin friction at 15 ft: f 0.538σ ' psf s π 1 4. Ultimate friction capacity: Q s π 1 9 k
27 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 7 7C) What is the ultimate end bearing capacity of a pile embedded 5 feet into the sand rier bottom? 1. Ultimate end-bearing capacity: Qt σ' NqAtip Q t from test at 15 feet 3 k N q is the same at 15 and 5 feet 5 feet is deeper than the critical depth of 15 feet, σ ' 5 ' σ ' 15'. So, Q t at 5 feet 3 k 7D) Using a factor of safety of 3.0, what is the allowable capacity of a pile embedded 5 feet into the sand if the water leel rises 10 feet? 1. Allowable capacity: FS 3 Q all Qult FS Q ult Q s + Q t Change in water leel does not change Q s and Q t from preious requirements. Q ult k 61. Q all 0.3 k 3
28 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 8 Module 8 - Seepage Situation 1 A 10-foot thick layer of Soil A oerlies Soil B, as shown in the figure below. The ground surface is at eleation 100 feet. Soil A has a coefficient of permeability of 0 ft/day and a total unit weight of 15 pcf. Soil B has a coefficient of permeability of 10 ft/day and a total unit weight of 10 pcf. Groundwater is obsered at the ground surface, eleation 100. A piezometer is installed in Soil B at eleation 75. The total head measured in the piezometer is eleation 85. Eleation (ft) Soil A k 0 ft/day γ t 15 pcf Soil B k 10 ft/day γ t 10 pcf Piezometer Requirements 8-1A) What is the total ertical stress at eleation 90? 1. Total ertical stress: σ γh. σ psf 8-1B) What is the total ertical stress at eleation 75? 1. Total ertical stress: σ γ Ah A + γ Bh B. σ psf
29 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 9 8-1C) What is the ertical effectie stress at eleation 75? 1. Vertical effectie stress: σ ' σ u u h p γ w h h h p t e u psf. σ ' psf
30 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering D) What is the ertical effectie stress at eleation 90? 1. Vertical effectie stress: σ ' σ u σ 150 psf u h p γ w h p h t h e h e 90 ft h t h. To find head loss through layer A, start with Darcy s equation: Q kia For A 1 ft, Q A Q B k A i A k B i B i i A B h H A A h H k A 0; H A 10 k B 10; H B 15 k A h h H A A A B B k h 3 B B A h H h B We know that h A + h B 15, so + h B 15 3 h A 3.7 ft B B h B 11.3 ft 3. Returning to the equations for head: h t h A ft h t 90 h p ft 4. So, pore pressure, u And σ ' psf
31 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering E) What is the rate of ertical seepage for a 1 square foot area? 1. With one-dimensional flow, use Darcy s equation to find seepage rate: Q kia k A 0 ft/day 3.7 i A A 1 ft. Q ft 3 /day Situation A concrete dam is constructed on a fine sand layer, as shown on the figure below. The sand is underlain by imperious bedrock. The sand is 40 feet thick and has a coefficient of permeability of 10-4 ft/minute and a saturated unit weight of 1 pounds per cubic foot. The bottom of the dam is 5 feet below the top of the sand layer. The tail water is at the ground surface, eleation 100, and the leel of the head water is eleation 10. Use the flow net shown below to respond to the arious requirements. 60 ft E L 10 DAM A H 0 f t EL ft 35 ft Imperious B
32 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 3 Requirements 8-A) What is the rate of seepage (per foot of length) below the dam? N f 1. Seepage: Q k h N d k 10 4 ft/min N f 4 (number of flow channels, from flow net) N d 1 (equipotential drops, from flow net) h 0 ft Q ft / min 1 8-B) What is the total head at point A? 1. h h h T A T each equipotential drop represents an equal amount of head loss. There are 6 drops from the headwater side of the dam to point A, so: 6 h 0 10 ft ft h A T 8-C) What is the uplift pressure at the bottom of the dam at point A? 1. Uplift pressure: u h p γ w h h h p T e h T 110 ft h e 95 ft h p ft. u psf
33 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 33 8-D) What is the pore pressure at point B? 1. Pore pressure at B: u h p γ w h p h T h e Points A and B are on the same equipotential line, so they hae the same total head, so h T 110 ft h e 60 ft h p ft. u psf
34 Demonstration Problem Solutions Geotechnical Engineering 34 References: a. Adapted from: Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, Part I, Specifications, 13 th ed., AASHTO, 198. b. Adapted from: 1989 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, c. See: 1989 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, d. See, for example: Michael R. Lindeburg, Ciil Engineering Reference Manual, 7 th ed., Professional Publications, Inc., Belmont, CA, e. See, for example: Wayne C. Teng, Foundation Design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 196. f. See Module 4 Visual Aids g. From: Karl Terzaghi, Ralph B. Peck, and Gholamreza Mesri, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 3 rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996.
LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
Test Procedure for LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES TxDOT Designation: Tex-142-E Effective Date: August 1999 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method is a system for classifying disturbed and
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SOIL CLASSIFICATION...3 1.1 USCS: Unified Soil Classification System...3 1.1.1
More information14.330 SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.
Geotechnical Engineering Research Laboratory One University Avenue Lowell, Massachusetts 01854 Edward L. Hajduk, D.Eng, PE Lecturer PA105D Tel: (978) 94 2621 Fax: (978) 94 052 e mail: Edward_Hajduk@uml.edu
More informationENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design
This image cannot currently be displayed. ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations Total and Differential Settlement Schmertmann s Method This image cannot currently be displayed. Strength
More informationStandard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1
Designation: D 2487 06 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 2487; the number
More informationEarth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers
PDHonline Course C155 (2 PDH) Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers Instructor: Richard P. Weber, P.E. 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA
More informationSpecification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems
Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems The following specifications provide Allan Block Corporation's typical requirements and recommendations. At the engineer of record's
More informationSPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)
Page 1 of 7 STONE STRONG SYSTEMS SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised ) PART 1: GENERAL 1.01 Description A. Work includes furnishing and installing precast modular blocks
More informationvulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works
More informationModule 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS Topics 24.1 INTRODUCTION 24.2 GRAVITY AND CANTILEVER WALLS 24.3 PROPORTIONING RETAINING WALLS 24.4 APPLICATION OF LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE THEORIES TO DESIGN 24.5
More informationPART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone
GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone DESIGN MANUAL & KEYWALL OPERATING GUIDE GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT Keystone retaining walls
More informationload on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.
How Many Piers? By Gary Collins, P.E. A clear-cut guide to helical pier spacing Introduction Helical pier spacing is not an exact science. How many does it take to support a structure adequately or repair
More informationc. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.
Design Manual Chapter 6 - Geotechnical 6B - Subsurface Exploration Program 6B-2 Testing A. General Information Several testing methods can be used to measure soil engineering properties. The advantages,
More informationPeriod #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)
Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II) A. Review and Motivation (1) Review: In most soils, changes in total volume are associated with reductions in void volume. The volume change of the
More informationOhio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES
Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering Geotechnical Bulletin GB 1 PLAN SUBGRADES Geotechnical Bulletin GB1 was jointly developed by the Offices
More informationPILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134
C H A P T E R 6 PILE FOUNDATIONS Section I. GROUP BEHAVIOR 6-1. Group action. Piles are most effective when combined in groups or clusters. Combining piles in a group complicates analysis since the characteristics
More informationFOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples
FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 14-1 Load Path and Transfer to
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION
FUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION SAND (Vertical Stress Increase) CLAY CONSOLIDATION: Volume change in saturated soils caused by the expulsion of pore water from loading. Saturated Soils: causes u to increase
More informationFigure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate
Addendum HELICAL PULLDOWN Micropile (HPM) Introduction The HPM is a system for constructing a grout column around the shaft of a standard Helical Screw Foundation (see Figure A1). To begin the process,
More informationSoil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics
Soil is the most misunderstood term in the field. The problem arises in the reasons for which different groups or professions study soils. Soil scientists are interested in soils as a medium for plant
More informationEXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL
EXAMPLE DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL A sheet pile wall is required to support a 2 excavation. The soil is uniform as shown in the figure. To take into account the friction between the wall
More informationCHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS
CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS CONTENTS: Introduction, hydraulic head and water flow, Darcy s equation, laboratory determination of coefficient of permeability, field determination of coefficient
More information5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction
PIN Foundations Topics Applications Design and Construction Flow Control Credits www.pinfoundations.com Copyright 2008, Pin Foundations, Inc. Curtis Hinman WSU Extension Faculty, Watershed Ecologist chinman@wsu.edu
More informationCHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION
391 CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION 9.1 OVERVIEW OF FE SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION Clough and Denby (1969) introduced Finite Element analysis into the soil-structure interaction
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:
HANDOUT REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition RETAINING WALLS Fifth Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
More informationSoil Strength. Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall 2004. Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046
ENGR-627 Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities, Lecture # 4 Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall 2004 Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046 1 Soil Strength 2 Soil
More informationCE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions)
CE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions) P. 1) LOAD UNDER A RECTANGULAR AREA (1) Question: The footing shown in the figure below exerts a uniform pressure of 300 kn/m 2 to the soil. Determine vertical
More informationAssoc. Prof. Derin N. URAL. 2/16/2009 Mechanics of Soils 1
Mechanics of Soils Assoc. Prof. Derin N. URAL 2/16/2009 Mechanics of Soils 1 Lecture 1 SECION 1 Soil Formation Particle Size Distribution Soil Classification SECION 2 Soil Composition 3-phase material
More informationCONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST
CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST 1 Permeability is a measure of the ease in which water can flow through a soil volume. It is one of the most important geotechnical parameters. However,
More informationPHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS
0 PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS EXPERIMENTS #1-5 CE 3143 October 7, 2003 Group A David Bennett 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Experiment # 1: Determination of Water Content (August 26, 2003) pp. 1-3
More informationDIRT DWELLING. and your. www.pinfoundations.com. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008
DIRT and your DWELLING 2008 Pin Foundations Inc., 2008 If we accept that preserving soil in its native condition is necessary, then how do we build? Utilities? Roads? Foundations? Typical Strip, Transfer,
More informationModule 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS
Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS Topics 17.1 INTRODUCTION Rectangular Combined Footing: Trapezoidal Combined Footings: Cantilever Footing: Mat foundation: 17.2 COMMON TYPES OF MAT FOUNDATIONS
More informationThe Verdura Wall check with your local building department
The Verdura Wall The Verdura Wall by Soil Retention Products, Inc of Carlsbad, California can be constructed as a gravity retaining structure or a geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall, depending
More informationState of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS
State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS While its use is not required, this checklist has been prepared to provide the field inspector a summary
More informationALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE
C H A P T E R 5 ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE Section I. BASICS 5-1. Considerations. For safe, economical pile foundations in military construction, it is necessary to determine the allowable load capacity
More informationGeotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters
Geotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters Arpan Laskar Post Graduate Student Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology
More information1. ASTM C 140 - Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units 2. ASTM C 1372 Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Segmental Retaining Wall Units
SPECIFICATION FOR SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEMS PART 1: GENERAL 1.01 Description A. Work shall consist of furnishing materials, labor, equipment and supervision to install a segmental retaining wall
More informationSTRUCTURES. 1.1. Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.
STRUCTURES 1. General. Critical structures may impact the integrity of a flood control project in several manners such as the excavation for construction of the structure, the type of foundation, backfill
More informationAPPENDIX G SETTLEMENT
APPENDIX G SETTLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS G.1 IN T R O D U C T IO N... 1 G.2 MATERIAL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION... 1 G.2.1 Incom pressible M aterials... 1 G.2.2 Compressible Materials... 2 G.2.3 Soil P lacem
More informationGasketed PVC Sewer Pipe Durable, Flexible, Reliable Waterworks Products
Gasketed PVC Sewer Pipe Durable, Flexible, Reliable Waterworks Products www.pwpipe.com PWPipe Sewer Pipe Tough, Dependable, and Leak-free. Here s why: Figure 1. PWPipe Gasket Insertion line Bell is an
More informationFormwork for Concrete
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CM 420 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES Winter Quarter 2007 Professor Kamran M. Nemati Formwork for Concrete Horizontal Formwork Design and Formwork Design
More informationANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY
ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY ANNEX D1: BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN DRA FOR SAFETY D1-1 ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS
More informationPART 3 DEFINITION OF ROCKFILL VERSUS EARTHFILL MATERIAL
PART 3 DEFINITION OF ROCKFILL VERSUS EARTHFILL MATERIAL Allan J. Breitenbach, P.E. AB Engineering Inc. Littleton, Colorado, USA Telephone: 1/720-981-5244 Telefax: 1/720-981-5245 Email: ajbreitenbach@hotmail.com
More information10-1 10. CONSOLIDATION
10-1 10. CONSOLIDATION 10.1 INFLUENCE OF DRAINAGE ON RATE OF SETTLEMENT When a saturated stratum of sandy soil is subjected to a stress increase, such as that caused by the erection of a building on the
More informationComprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility
Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility Problem The project consists of building several dry product storage silos near an existing rail siding in an open field presently
More informationEXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD
EXPERIMENT 10 PERMEABILITY (HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY) TEST CONSTANT HEAD METHOD 106 Purpose: The purpose of this test is to determine the permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of a sandy soil by the constant
More informationSIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.
SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission. 1-800-UNILOCK www.unilock.com FOREWORD This outline specification has been prepared for
More informationA N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1
A N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1 Worked examples of retaining wall design to BS8002 The following worked examples have been prepared to illustrate the application of BS8002 to retaining
More informationEurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing Dr.-Ing. Bernd Schuppener, Federal Waterways Engineering
More informationEstimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah
Estimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah Report Prepared for the Utah Department of Transportation Research Division by Steven F. Bartlett, PhD. P.E. Assistant Professor
More informationNJ650.1404 Interception Drainage
NJ650.1404 Interception Drainage Interception drainage is used to intercept surface and subsurface water. The investigation, planning, and construction of surface interception drains follow the requirements
More informationUNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN
UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN Tailings and HLP Workshop 28 April to 1 May 2010 INTRODUCTION The internal drainage is of crucial importance to the reliability and safety of a tailings dam throughout
More informationDrained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength
Drained and Undrained Conditions Undrained and Drained Shear Strength Lecture No. October, 00 Drained condition occurs when there is no change in pore water pressure due to external loading. In a drained
More informationType of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)
Cause: external force P Force vs. Stress Effect: internal stress f 05 Force vs. Stress Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-05 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Type of Force 1 Axial (tension /
More informationRetaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations
Retaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations The implementation of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
More informationWesteros Design Project
CER340: Soil Mechanics and Foundaion Design Ari Perez Westeros Design Project Introduction King Aerys of House Targaryen, First of His Name, King of the Andals and the First Men, Lord of the Seven Kingdoms,
More informationFor Water to Move a driving force is needed
RECALL FIRST CLASS: Q K Head Difference Area Distance between Heads Q 0.01 cm 0.19 m 6cm 0.75cm 1 liter 86400sec 1.17 liter ~ 1 liter sec 0.63 m 1000cm 3 day day day constant head 0.4 m 0.1 m FINE SAND
More informationC. Section 014510 TESTING LABORATORY SERVICE.
SECTION 014500 QUALITY CONTROL PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 RELATED REQUIREMENTS A. Drawings and General Provisions of Contract, including General and Special Conditions and other Division 1 Specification Sections,
More informationNOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.
September 1, 2003 CONCRETE MANUAL 5-694.300 MIX DESIGN 5-694.300 NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT. 5-694.301
More informationSOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Lesson 08
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Lesson 08 Chapter 8 Shallow Foundations Testing Theory Experience Topics gtopic 1 (Section 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4) - General and Bearing Capacity gtopic 2 (Section 8.5, 8.6, 8.7,
More informationSOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
CHAPTER 1 SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS SECTION 101 GENERAL 101.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to building and foundation systems in those areas not subject to scour or water pressure by wind
More informationVERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL TYPES OF LOADING. Point Loads (P) Line Loads (q/unit length) Examples: - Posts. Examples: - Railroad track
VERTICAL STRESS INCREASES IN SOIL Point Loads (P) TYPES OF LOADING Line Loads (q/unit length) Revised 0/015 Figure 6.11. Das FGE (005). Examples: - Posts Figure 6.1. Das FGE (005). Examples: - Railroad
More informationCOMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2
(PREVIEW) SP 36 (Part 2) : 1988 COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2 IS 1893 : 1979 (Reaffirmed 1987) CODE OF PRACTICE FOR SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION FOR FOUNDATIONS 1.1 This code deals
More information1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona
for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures SECTION 70 - GENERAL "APPENDIX CHAPTER 7 - EARTHEN MATERIAL STRUCTURES 70. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum standards of safety
More informationSECTION 3.3 - PAVEMENT DESIGN
SECTION 3.3-3.3.1 GENERAL 3.3.2 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 3.3.3 DETERMINATION OF DESIGN TRAFFIC 3.3.4 SUBGRADE EVALUATION 3.3.5 PAVEMENT THICKNESS 3.3.5.1 GRANULAR PAVEMENTS WITH THIN BITUMINOUS SURFACING 3.3.5.2
More informationDesign, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils
Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils Stephen W. Lacz 1, M. ASCE, P.E. and Richard C. Wells 2, F. ASCE, P.E. 1 Senior Professional, Trigon Kleinfelder, Inc., 313 Gallimore
More informationNumerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test
International Journal of Applied Science and Technology Vol. 2 No. 3; March 2012 Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test Nutan Palla Project Engineer, Tolunay-Wong Engineers, Inc. 10710 S Sam
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Test Report
Geotechnical Investigation Test Report Report No. htsc/rcd/ 3457 Dated: - 20/03/2010 Asphalt Standard Penetration Test as per IS 2131 ------------- IS 6403 Soil Job Card No - 1649 Cement Client/Department
More information4.3 Results... 27 4.3.1 Drained Conditions... 27 4.3.2 Undrained Conditions... 28 4.4 References... 30 4.5 Data Files... 30 5 Undrained Analysis of
Table of Contents 1 One Dimensional Compression of a Finite Layer... 3 1.1 Problem Description... 3 1.1.1 Uniform Mesh... 3 1.1.2 Graded Mesh... 5 1.2 Analytical Solution... 6 1.3 Results... 6 1.3.1 Uniform
More informationGeotechnical Engineering: Slope Stability
Geotechnical Engineering: Slope Stability Course No: G06-001 Credit: 6 PDH Yun Zhou, PhD, PE Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 9 Greyridge Farm Court Stony Point, NY 10980 P: (877) 322-5800 F:
More informationEN 1997-1 Eurocode 7. Section 10 Hydraulic Failure Section 11 Overall Stability Section 12 Embankments. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland
EN 1997 1: Sections 10, 11 and 12 Your logo Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 Section 10 Hydraulic Failure Section 11 Overall Stability Section
More informationproduct manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer
HS-4210_MAN_09.08 product manual HS-4210 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer Introduction This Manual covers the measurement of bearing capacity using the Humboldt Digital Static Cone Penetrometer (DSCP).
More informationSoil Mechanics: Description and Classification
Soil Mechanics: Description and Classification Course No: G04-002 Credit: 4 PDH Yun Zhou, PhD, PE Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 9 Greyridge Farm Court Stony Point, NY 10980 P: (877) 322-5800
More informationCopyright 2015 Pecivilexam.com all rights reserved- Breadth Exam 120 solved Problems. www.pecivilexam.com
www.pecivilexam.com 2015 PE Exam Standard Specification PE Civil Exam E-Book120-Mix Questions & Answers (pdf Format) For Breath Exam (Morning Session) Breadth Exam (morning session): These practice exams
More informationDESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION
DESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION Introduction Bengt H. Fellenius, Dr.Tech., P.Eng. Background Notes for Demo Example for UniPile at www.unisoftltd.com
More informationUse and Application of Piezocone Penetration Testing in Presumpscot Formation
Use and Application of Piezocone Penetration Testing in Presumpscot Formation Craig W. Coolidge, P.E. Summit Geoengineering Services, Rockland, Maine ABSTRACT: This paper examines the advantages and limitations
More informationSOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
CHAPTER 18 SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS SECTION BC 1801 GENERAL 1801.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to building and foundation systems in those areas not subject to scour or water pressure
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S-000900-0109-3 HOUSTON, TEXAS
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S-000900-0109-3 HOUSTON, TEXAS Reported To: LAN, Inc. Houston, Texas by Aviles Engineering
More informationCONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM PART 1: GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS 1.01 Work Included A. Work shall consist of furnishing and constructing a Rockwood Vintage TM unit segmental retaining wall (SRW)
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013 Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.0 Research article ISSN 0976 4399 Reliability of
More informationGEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of civil engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328 email: cejnm@civil.iitb.ac.in Module - 4
More informationSECTION 31 20 00 EARTH MOVING
SECTION 31 20 00 PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 DESCRIPTION A. This Section describes the requirements for excavating, filling, and grading for earthwork at Parking Structure, new exit stair and as required to
More informationDIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA
DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA DIRECT SHEAR TEST OBJEVTIVES To determine the shear strength parameters for a
More informationReport on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars
Report on Wind Resistance of Signs supported by Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars Prepared for US Sign and Fabrication Corporation January, 2006 SUMMARY This study found the attachment of
More informationOpen channel flow Basic principle
Open channel flow Basic principle INTRODUCTION Flow in rivers, irrigation canals, drainage ditches and aqueducts are some examples for open channel flow. These flows occur with a free surface and the pressure
More informationCreep Characteristics and Shear Strength. of Recycled Asphalt Blends. Jeffery M. Schaper
Creep Characteristics and Shear Strength of Recycled Asphalt Blends by Jeffery M. Schaper A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved April 2011
More informationTable of Contents 10.1 GENERAL... 10.1-1
Table of Contents Section Page 10.1 GENERAL... 10.1-1 10.1.1 Overview... 10.1-1 10.1.2 Role of Uncertainty in Property Interpretation... 10.1-1 10.1.3 Role of Drainage in Property Interpretation... 10.1-2
More informationHow To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska
APPENDIX B Geotechnical Engineering Report GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Preliminary Geotechnical Study Upper Southeast Salt Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer Lincoln Wastewater System Lincoln, Nebraska PREPARED
More informationHYDRAULIC STRUCTURES, EQUIPMENT AND WATER DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEMS Vol. IV - Testing of Materials and Soils - F. Druyts
TESTING OF MATERIALS AND SOILS F. Druyts Pr. Eng., Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa Keywords: Materials testing, soil mechanics/properties, construction materials, earth
More information20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS. Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers 10.18.
20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers 10.18.06 BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING TRADES CLASSROOMS COMMONS/CIRCULATION
More informationK x ' Retaining. Walls ENCE 461. Foundation Analysis and Design. Mohr s Circle. and Lateral Earth. Pressures. Lateral Earth Pressure.
Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient K x ' z ' K = lateral earth pressure coefficient x = horizontal effective stress Mohr s Circle and Lateral Earth Pressures x ' = = z ' ENCE 461 Foundation Analysis and
More informationA study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil
ISSN: 319-53 (An ISO 39: 00 Certified Organization) A study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil Utpal Kumar Das Associate Professor, Department
More informationArea No. 8 Test Pit No. 191
Area No. 8 Test Pit No. 191 Area Sierra-Yoyo-Desan Road Excavator Cat 322 B Photographs Location 43 m @ 40 degrees from TP-189 Northing 6571912 Date 03 March 2003 R4-7 Easting 0568784 Weather -17 C, Snow
More informationCivil. 2. City of Seattle Supplement to the Specification for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, most current addition.
Design Guide Basis of Design This section applies to the design and installation of earthwork and backfill. Design Criteria No stockpiling of excavation materials is allowed unless the Geotechnical Engineer
More informationStormwater Management Design Brief. Proposed Commercial Redevelopment 5830 Hazeldean Road Ottawa (Stittsville), Ontario.
Stormwater Management Design Brief Proposed Commercial Redevelopment 5830 Hazeldean Road Ottawa (Stittsville), Ontario Prepared For: 1319 Kanata Tires & Rims June 30, 2015 Report No: FS-15-013-REP.02 Stormwater
More informationCONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM
CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM PART 1: GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS 1.01 Work Included A. Work shall consist of furnishing and constructing a Rockwood Classic 8 with PCS unit segmental retaining wall
More informationAppendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils
Appendix D.1 Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils General Notes Pertinent to All Testing 1. For infiltration trench (I-1) and basin (I-2) practices, a minimum field
More informationEffect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand
Discovery ANALYSIS The International Daily journal ISSN 2278 5469 EISSN 2278 5450 2015 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength
More informationSNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report. October 2011
SNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report October 2011 SNC-Lavalin Inc Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report Table of Contents 1.0
More informationCOSMOS 2012: Earthquakes in Action COSMOS 2012
COSMOS 2012 What is SFSI and why is it important? Soil issues in Earthquakes Structures where SFSI important Retaining structures (lateral earth pressure) Foundations (spread and pile footings, bearing
More information