APPENDIX F:TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE ANALYSIS

Similar documents
Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

Topic 2 11/28/2012 Blocks & Street Network

EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks

Tier 1 Strategies. WV Route 14 Corridor Management Plan


Chapter 9: Transportation

New Jersey SRTS Travel Plan Guide

Presentation to Community Task Force July 9, 2007

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

BEST PRACTICES. Smart Transportation is a key concept for the Paoli Roadway Improvement Project.

Proposed Service Design Guidelines

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis

North Avenue Corridor Study. Advisory Committee Meeting #5 June 11, 2014

Draft Non Transportation Performance Measures Including Related Qualitative Assessment of Example Sections

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE STANDARDS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

The Triple Bottom Line (TBL) of Sustainable Floodplain Management

Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study. June 19, 2013

REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs

Comprehensive Plan Policies that support Infill and Mixed Use

**The Winter 2010 edition of The Road Ahead newsletter is available online.

Implementation Strategy

Schenk-Atwood Neighborhood Business District Master Plan

Measuring the Street:

in Marina Del Rey Prepared by: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL 11

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

Texas Case Studies in Access Management. Ed Hard, TTI

How To Design A Crash Investigation Site

For more information, visit: rethinkingstreets.com

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR DESIGNING YOUR SAFE ROUTES

2 Integrated planning. Chapter 2. Integrated Planning. 2.4 State highway categorisation and integrated planning

DIVISION STREET CORRIDOR STRATEGY Arlington, Texas May 17, 2012

Performance Measures for a Sustainable Transportation Network Pasadena s Approach Frederick C. Dock, Ellen Greenberg, Mark Yamarone

OVERVIEW PROJECT SUMMARY

Introduction & Welcome

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Budget Forecast estimates that housing

Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

3.1 Historical Considerations

Harlem River Bridges Access Plan

Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High

SAFE Streets for CHICAGO

PEDESTRIAN PLANNING AND DESIGN MARK BRUSSEL

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON

CITY OF BRAMPTON STREET CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE PLACEMAKING STUDY Boston Redevelopment Authority

Evaluation Criteria and Mode Progression for RouteAhead Rapid Transit Projects

Attachment B Policy Audit Template

Evanston Main Street Station TOD Plan and Study. Appendix A.1: Station Area Existing Conditions

Mayors Welcome Strong Surrey Votes Yes Coalition Support. Yes Vote Would Vastly Improve Transit and Transportation in Fast Growing City

Michael B. Hancock Mayor. October 31, 2014

SECTION 6: TRANSPORTATION

In 2005, the City of Pasadena, CA, USA, with the support of consultants,

Oregon City Clackamas County Red Soils Campus

ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Discussion. Presented to ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Advisory Group July 29 th, 2015

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

Corridor Goals and Objectives

01/31/13 ACHIEVING THE VISION FOR RESTON. Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force

N Street Protected Bikeway

Introduction to Station Area Planning The Charlotte Story

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

HOW WILL PROGRESS BE MONITORED? POLICY AREA. 1. Implement the 2040 Growth Concept and local adopted land use and transportation plans

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

Needs Analysis. Long Beach Bicycle Master Plan. Bicycle Commuter Needs. LONG BEACH BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Needs Analysis

STREETS -- BICYCLES -- PATHS

City of Auburn Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for Curb Ramps, Sidewalks, and Pedestrian Signals ADA TRANSITION PLAN

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #1 December 8, :00 p.m.

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

Significant investment and improvement of infrastructure and transport networks, delivered at no cost and no risk

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

HARRIS TEETER AT LADY S ISLAND CITY OF BEAUFORT DRB CONCEPTUAL PROJECT NARRATIVE Submittal Date: September 2, 2015 Meeting Date: September 10, 2015

Performance measures for active transportation

6 Streetscape character 6.1

Chapter 22. Lump Sum Project Guidelines

Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before and After Study. N 34th Street to N 50th Street

Alternatives Evaluation Overview

Review Public Input Report Jenn Toothaker. Approval of Meeting Summaries: May 21, May 23, May 30, & June 20, 2013 Meetings

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Developing Street Standards That Allow Flexibility

DE 8 Concept Plan and Operations Study. Dover Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee October 23, 2007

Guiding Principles. McCauley Area Focused Urban Design Plan. 1 Connect: Chinatown and Little Italy with downtown and surrounding areas

FHWA Colorado Division Control of Access to the Interstate and its Right-of-Way February 2005

Sustainable urban mobility: visions beyond Europe. Brest. Udo Mbeche, UN-Habitat

Safety Evidence for Bicycling

FY 2011 OHIO SMALL CITIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT COMPREHENSIVE DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PROGRAM

Q. What do you think the most important transportation issues are in this area with regard to east-west travel?

5 NINTH LINE TRUCK RESTRICTION UPDATE TOWN OF MARKHAM

The Real Estate Council of Austin Questionnaire to Candidates Austin City Council November 4, 2014 Election

These "rules of the road" are based on Texas Transportation Code statutes. Find the complete bicycle code at the bottom of the page

Agenda. } Beltline Study Background } PEL Basics } UW Survey Results } Strategy Development and Results } Next Steps

Transportation. Public Streets

Transcription:

APPENDIX F:TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE ANALYSIS

Triple Bottom Line Analysis Map (TBLAM) Project or Decision: College Ave Corridor for FC Moves long range transportation plan for College Ave., for redevelopment and transportation infrastructure updates; bike access, medians, traffic function, etc. Evaluated by: Staff from FC Moves and TBL Team Social Environmental Economic Community The corridor plan will affect everyone passing through mid- Town FC. Crosses Spring Creek and connects people with the env. Corridor. Some aging infrastructure problems can be resolved with upgrades. Will better align the viewsheds in mid-town with Old-town. Connects to the Mason Corridor MAX. Business visibility can be enhanced by reformatting frontage roads and offset intersections. Transitions from a short term plan to a longer term plan Increased job creation potential. Fits in well with existing projects (i.e. Mall redevelopment, Mason Corridor MAX). Aesthetically pleasing. Provides LID demonstration and R&D areas. LIMITATIONS: Affects too big or small an area of town. Does not resolve primary problem of vehicle congestion on College Ave. Trading off vehicular mobility for parking space and retail space, and for alternative transportation vehicles Construction will mess up traffic flow. State highway status and corridor width are fixed limitations we must design around. Sends more traffic to Old Town, where congestion is already a problem. SFCBA will be able to engage in marketing and branding Is this the best use of public revenue? Are we subsidizing private dev.? Where is everyone going to park?. Trading off vehicular mobility for parking space and retail space, and for alternative transportation vehicles. Some aging infrastructure problems can be resolved with upgrades. Connecting College with Mason Corridor will reduce total vehicle miles. Reduced congestion should reduce air quality impacts and carbon output per vehicle. Aesthetically pleasing (urban canopy opps in the median and adjacent areas). Provides LID demonstration and R&D areas. Enhanced bike/ped access will reduce carbon emissions. Enhanced construction methods can reduce emissions created by heavy equipment LIMITATIONS Connection with Spring Creek could become a permitting and process headache. State highway status and corridor width are fixed limitations we must design around. Sends more traffic to Old Town, where congestion is already a problem. Reduced congestion creates better vehicle flow increasing traffic and total impact on air quality impacts and carbon output. Where is everyone going to park? More parking lots is not an environmental asset. Construction will create temporary carbon emission increases. Increased access & mobility can benefit current businesses. Increased access & mobility can trigger beneficial redevelopment opportunities. Connects to the Mason Corridor MAX funding and function. Will kick off other econ. catalysts (sustainable use of land). Business visibility can be enhanced by reformatting frontage roads and offset intersections. SFCBA will be able to engage in marketing and branding Increased job creation potential. Fits in well with existing projects (i.e. Mall redevelopment, Mason Corridor MAX). Opp. to increase public safety with better transportation flow. LIMITATIONS: If impacts a large an area of town, the construction may get expensive. If impacts a large an area of town, the contractor may not be able to contain it. State highway status and corridor width are fixed limitations we must design around. Is this the best use of public revenue? Are we subsidizing private dev.? Budget limitations exist fixed budget on plan and implementation. Provides LID demonstration and R&D areas. Where is everyone going to park?

Crosses Spring Creek and connects people with the env. Corridor. Will kick off other econ. Catalysts (sust. Use of land). Planning process can create a modal shift (internal capture) redev into mixed use encourages some to walk or ride to work, saving trips and reducing vehicle traffic. Provide better mobility to people with disabilities and low to moderate income. SFCBA will be able to engage in marketing and branding. Opp. to increase public safety with better transportation flow. Crosses Spring Creek, and provides an opp. to reconnect with the SpCk corridor (and others). Will kick off other econ. Catalysts (sust. Use of land). Sensitive environmental resources could be harmed if not appropriately accommodated. Planning process can create a modal shift (internal capture) redev into mixed use encourages some to walk or ride to work, saving trips and reducing vehicle traffic. Provide better mobility to people with disabilities and low to moderate income. Provides a chance to be creative with other public financing opportunities. Sends more traffic to Old Town, where congestion is already a problem. SFCBA will be able to engage in marketing and branding.

TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE ANALYSIS Derived from a TBLAM Brainstorm on FC MOVES COLLEGE AVE CORRIDOR PLAN In Collaboration with the FC Moves Purpose: To extract key triple bottom line information from a TBLAM, and use that information to offer recommendations on key indicators and suggested action items for the College Ave. Corridor Plan at FC Moves. I. General Observations from TBL Analysis Map (TBLAM): A. The TBLAM was well balanced with ample strengths and limitations identified. B. Many considerations crossed into many columns, and rows. 1. Crossing columns indicates excellent depth of discussion and debate. 2. Crossing of rows indicates potential for conflicting values. C. More data and expertise is needed from Environmental Services personnel. 1. Not intended, but very clear during the TBLAM Process D. Limitations show a primary cross-cutting concern involving the CDOT process for US 287. E. Threats should be further explored and contain more information on community and traffic growth. F. Mason Corridor MAX has a strong presence on the TBLAM. G. Foothills Mall redevelopment has a strong presence on the TBLAM. II. III. Conclusions Offered: A. Need to refine TBLAM again in phases; re-tblam. 1. Project is large-scale and would benefit from a re-tblam ahead of critical phases. B. Need to engage other stakeholders in the re-tblam process. 1. Add CDOT, Environmental Services, Commission on Disabilities, Chamber of Commerce, South FC Business Association 2. Look for others, including student population. 3. Provide a ½-page briefing as a read-before packet on goals, objectives, and needs. C. Clarity should be offered in the AIS as to where TBL discussions occurred. 1. At these stages we brainstormed at the TBL level 2. Show some project flow and iteration, and re-iteration for re-tblam. 3. Make TBL part of your regular communication plan. 4. Connection to the Mason Corridor MAX needs to be clarified to the public in a separate analysis. 5. Integration into the Mall should be clarified in a separate analysis. Potential Key Indicators Suggested: A. Limitations discussion suggests new stakeholders must be involved in TBLAM process right away. 1. If not now, let s get them to the table soon as stakeholders. 2. Need to be sensitive to conflicting values of potential stakeholders and facilitate accordingly. B. Re-TBLAM on a phased-schedule basis. 1. Include this process in a communication plan & public engagement plan. 2. Must determine how to sell the vision, not the details. a. Focus on community strengths that are non-quantifiable. b. Get a good sales pitch, and coordinate with CPIO to message to the public. C. Provide Transportation Study information and calculations to address current and future traffic trends. 1. Multi-modal corridor needs to identify key challenges. 2. Connection to the Mason Corridor should be front and center. D. Post-TBLAM review environmental suggestions warrant detailed meetings and coordination directly with Environmental Services staff. E. Question for FC Moves please return any feedback to the TBL Team. 1. Was this useful? Did this help? 2. What came from the discussion? How will you use this? 3. How could the TBL brainstorm be improved? 4. Would you like the TBL Team involved in any future TBLAMs for this project?

Triple Bottom Line Analysis Map (TBLAM) Project or Decision: Midtown in Motion (Mim): College Avenue Transportation Plan MiM is a long-range transportation infrastructure reinvestment plan for 3 miles of College Avenue as identified in the Midtown Plan. Investments include new multi-use pathways, intersection safety improvements, medians, lighting, signage and connections to MAX. Evaluated by: Staff and Midtown in Motion project team Social Environmental Economic Community The investments support the Midtown Plan vision and goals for placemaking, civic identity, and mobility. Consistent pathways could encourage safer walking and riding and more physical activity. The investments support safer neighborhood circulation. The art, signage, and median treatments reinforce the public realm in the corridor. New sidewalks and pathways connect to Mason Corridor/MAX allowing city-wide access to College Avenue. Neighborhoods along the frontage roads will have safer streets and stronger identity. The multi-use pathways connect to Spring Creek allowing neighborhoods near the corridor to access open space. The multi-use pathways provide safer transportation options for women, children, disabled travelers and seniors. The investments offers convenient, world-class, and safe transportation options to residents and visitors of all income levels The strategic locations for pubic art meet the cultural and civic themes identified in the Midtown Plan. The funding options include representation from corridor property owners in capital and maintenance investments. Incremental project funding allows for adapting trends and changing identities over the next 20 years. The multi-use pathways and sidewalks provide transportation options and connections that contribute less GHG. The proposed investments will be located near existing neighborhoods and commercial areas that have been previously developed (location efficiency). The GHG contributed by motor vehicles at intersections could be reduce by the proposed free right intersection design. New median and edge treatments will use landscaping that requires less water and reduces heat reflection. Rebuilt retaining walls, medians, and edge treatments will include landscaping to reduce sound reflection into neighborhoods and businesses. New lighting and traffic signal equipment will use LED technology to minimize energy costs and consumption. New medians and edge treatments will be designed to filter storm water prior to conveying it to the storm water system. Recycled concrete will be used for the construction of the multiuse pathways when possible and available from contractors. Advanced construction methods and materials will be requested by all contractors to reduce emissions created by heavy equipment The investments in College Avenue have city-wide benefit to sales tax revenue and world-class identify. The phased funding program will minimize business impact during construction and ensure the corridor is always open for business. The multi-use pathways and sidewalk will increase the number of patrons that can access businesses in the corridor, even if motor vehicle traffic increase in the future. The transportation, arts, signage, and median investments reinforce the city s commitment to implementing the Midtown Plan to current and future land owners. Safer intersections and the multi-use pathways support safer neighborhood access to and from businesses in the corridor. Sidewalk and multi-use pathway connections to the Mason Corridor/MAX bring more patrons into the corridor. Supports the economic and identity objectives outlined by the South Fort Collins Business Association. Supports creation of mid and high wage jobs in the corridor during and after construction. Supports ongoing redevelopment efforts and joint public and private sector investment at Foothills Mall.

LIMITATIONS: The investments are contingent on available funding that could take up to 20 years to achieve the Midtown Plan vision. The investments are part of changing transportation priorities that will take time to gain larger acceptance. The one-way frontage roads will require education and enforcement to achieve the vision Multi-use pathways provide access to businesses in the corridor but connections through the parking lots to front doors will be contingent on private land owners The existing right of way has limited space to add travel lanes to accommodate more vehicles. The barriers created by 40,000 vehicles on College Avenue (daily) will exist, but will be safer. The investments leverage the College Avenue brand that is iconic across Colorado and Fort Collins The investments demonstrate the city s commitment to complete streets for all travelers The investments in public art establish a gateway in the Midtown area. The investments demonstrate what is possible on a worldclass street. Managing public perception on how the investments are working toward the Midtown Plan vision. Community consensus on the role and location of public art in the corridor. Balancing the need to make safer walking and wheeling connections if it results in increased delay for motor vehicles. LIMITATIONS The retaining walls, medians, and edge treatments will reduce the amount of impervious land, but new sidewalks and multi-use paths will be constructed. Construction will create temporary carbon emission increases from equipment and workers. The potential GHG benefit from the sidewalks and multi-use paths could maintain current GHG levels as trip making increases, but 40,000 vehicles will still travel in the corridor. The ability to maximize the GHG reduction from the investments will require increased support of FC moves programs in Midtown. Sustainable maintenance practices will need to be identified for the additional vehicles and materials required for summer and winter maintenance of the sidewalks and multi-use paths. The local and regional destinations in this corridor will showcase the energy, water, social, and economic sustainability solutions to a diverse audience. The investments in sidewalks and multi-use paths could demonstrate before and after how much GHG is reduced by shifting transportation modes The investments in LED lighting could demonstrate before and after how much energy was saved The investments will take 20 years to quantify the GHG reduction goals, improved water quality, and reduced energy benefits. The ability to achieve GHG reduction goals, improved water quality, and reduced energy use in the corridor could be limited by available funding. LIMITATIONS: The capital cost of the various project elements will require a systematic plan with a 20-year investment program. The 3 mile corridor will be phased over time as funding is available The investments will require education and understanding of the economic benefits by groups such as the Chamber of Commerce, the city s finance department and the SFCBA. The investments may need to be made in advance of the private sector redevelopment efforts The investments may require additional private sector subsidy to maintain the higher quality infrastructure (possibility for BID funding) Managing construction impacts to businesses and neighbors. The designation of this corridor as a state and federal highway could leverage additional funding sources The private land owners in the corridor are aware of the need to invest in this corridor to achieve the Midtown Plan The investments are consistent with the criteria for many local, state, and federal transportation-funding sources. The upcoming CDOT repaving project will reduce some short-term action item costs by adding curb ramps, removing signs, and providing safer access points with new striping. The community perception of the 20-year shared cost of achieving the Midtown Plan transportation vision. Allocating the necessary 20-30% local matching funds for state and federal funding programs. Priority of these investments given the other city-wide transportation needs. NOTES: