On the re-calibration of Ni-foil reference standards



Similar documents
Coating Thickness and Composition Analysis by Micro-EDXRF

Calibration Certificate

Manual for simulation of EB processing. Software ModeRTL

P R E A M B L E. Facilitated workshop problems for class discussion (1.5 hours)

OPTICAL PARTICLE SIZER MASS CALIBRATION METHOD

Working paper: Sky Quality Meter cross-calibration in the BMP project

Standard Test Method for Classification of Film Systems for Industrial Radiography 1

As published in PIM International

GMP 11. Good Measurement Practice for Assignment and Adjustment of Calibration Intervals for Laboratory Standards

Imaging Systems Laboratory II. Laboratory 4: Basic Lens Design in OSLO April 2 & 4, 2002

Exercise 1: How to Record and Present Your Data Graphically Using Excel Dr. Chris Paradise, edited by Steven J. Price

Study the Quality Assurance of Conventional X-ray Machines Using Non Invasive KV meter

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

International Year of Light 2015 Tech-Talks BREGENZ: Mehmet Arik Well-Being in Office Applications Light Measurement & Quality Parameters

FISCHERSCOPE X-RAY Product Line X-Ray Fluorescence Measuring Instruments for the Measurement of Coating Thickness and Material Analysis

7üVNORD. TÜV NORD Röntgentechnik

Chemotaxis and Migration Tool 2.0

Principles of Ion Implant

Calibration Service Selection Guide

Manual Analysis Software AFD 1201

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

Synthetic Sensing: Proximity / Distance Sensors

Measurement of Charge-to-Mass (e/m) Ratio for the Electron

CT for the production floor: Recent developments in Hard- and Software for industrial CT Systems

Experiment #1, Analyze Data using Excel, Calculator and Graphs.

Experimental Uncertainties (Errors)

AS COMPETITION PAPER 2007 SOLUTIONS

Centripetal force, rotary motion, angular velocity, apparent force.

User checks and maintenance of laboratory balances

Inventory Control. Inventory Control Tank & Silo Weighing

Welcome to Physics 40!

CT Traceability - Prof. Wim Dewulf, Group T - KU Leuven

Correcting the Lateral Response Artifact in Radiochromic Film Images from Flatbed Scanners

General and statistical principles for certification of RM ISO Guide 35 and Guide 34

Uncertainty evaluations in EMC measurements

Calibration of Volumetric Glassware

Calibration and Use of a Strain-Gage-Instrumented Beam: Density Determination and Weight-Flow-Rate Measurement

The process components and related data characteristics addressed in this document are:

Precision Lightmeters Made in Germany

Metrological features of a beta absorption particulate air monitor operating with wireless communication system

Diffraction of Laser Light

AP Physics 1 and 2 Lab Investigations

2 Absorbing Solar Energy

Perthometer. Surface Texture Parameters New Standards DIN EN ISO / ASME

Atomic Calculations. 2.1 Composition of the Atom. number of protons + number of neutrons = mass number

METHODS FOR THE CALIBRATION OF ELECTROSTATIC MEASURING INSTRUMENTS

A PRIMARY CALIBRATION SYSTEM FOR THE SUPPORT OF HIGH PERFORMANCE GAS FLOW TRANSFER STANDARDS

Measurement of RF Emissions from a Final Coat Electronics Corrosion Module

Data representation and analysis in Excel

Index-Velocity Rating Development (Calibration) for H-ADCP Real-Time Discharge Monitoring in Open Channels

Supporting document to NORSOK Standard C-004, Edition 2, May 2013, Section 5.4 Hot air flow

MAVO-MONITOR / MAVO-SPOT Instrument Set for Contact or Distant Measurements of Luminances

Laws of Collision / demonstration track

STANDARD OPERATING GUIDELINES: EVIDENTIAL BREATH ALCOHOL INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION

Monte Carlo simulation of a scanning whole body counter and the effect of BOMAB phantom size on the calibration.

PROFORMA ACCEPTANCE / QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTS OF REMOTE AFTERLOADING BRACHYTHERAPY UNIT

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

World-first Proton Pencil Beam Scanning System with FDA Clearance

Keywords: Torque, calibration, uncertainty, torque tools, torque testers. Contents

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

Chapter 3 SYSTEM SCANNING HARDWARE OVERVIEW

Determination of the Effective Energy in X-rays Standard Beams, Mammography Level

L-LAS-TB-CL serie. laser light curtains for inline measuring tasks

FREJA Win Software for FREJA relay testing system

Modifying Colors and Symbols in ArcMap

Chapter Test B. Chapter: Measurements and Calculations

We bring quality to light. MAS 40 Mini-Array Spectrometer. light measurement

Numerical Model for the Study of the Velocity Dependence Of the Ionisation Growth in Gas Discharge Plasma

A MTR FUEL ELEMENT FLOW DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENT PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Application Note: Absorbance

Hellma. Where precision becomes an art. Calibration standards for spectrophotometers by Hellma

Name: Due: September 21 st Physics 7230 Laboratory 3: High Resolution SEM Imaging

Performance testing for Precision 500D Classical R/F System

Calibration of Volumetric Glassware

Prism 6 Step-by-Step Example Linear Standard Curves Interpolating from a standard curve is a common way of quantifying the concentration of a sample.

IDEAL AND NON-IDEAL GASES

Syringe Calibration Factors and Volume Correction Factors for the NPL Secondary Standard Radionuclide Calibrator.

Amptek Application Note XRF-1: XRF Spectra and Spectra Analysis Software By R.Redus, Chief Scientist, Amptek Inc, 2008.

The Use of Hydrogen Carrier Gas for GC/MS

Conservation of Energy Physics Lab VI

GRID AND PRISM SPECTROMETERS

Project 2B Building a Solar Cell (2): Solar Cell Performance

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

Injection moulding and modelling on a micro scale

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD Nº 81

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT

The promise of ultrasonic phased arrays and the role of modeling in specifying systems

Trace Layer Import for Printed Circuit Boards Under Icepak

Harmonic oscillations of spiral springs Springs linked in parallel and in series

Experiment 5. Strain Gage Measurements

Piotr Tofiło a,*, Marek Konecki b, Jerzy Gałaj c, Waldemar Jaskółowski d, Norbert Tuśnio e, Marcin Cisek f

Unit 26: Small Sample Inference for One Mean

Rock Bolt Condition Monitoring Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves

Upon completion of this lab, the student will be able to:

C.-K. Ng. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. and. T. Weiland. University oftechnology. FB18, Schlossgartenstr. 8. D64289, Darmstadt, Germany.

Analysis of Blind Microvias Forming Process in Multilayer Printed Circuit Boards

DETERMINATION OF THE HEAT STORAGE CAPACITY OF PCM AND PCM-OBJECTS AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE. E. Günther, S. Hiebler, H. Mehling

A Determination of g, the Acceleration Due to Gravity, from Newton's Laws of Motion

SAR Distribution in Test Animals Exposed to RF Radiation

Series 6000 Torque measured metal bellow coupling

Transcription:

Fischer Traceability Report 2012 07 On the re-calibration of Ni-foil reference standards The production of a 4 new pure Ni primary standards characterized by gravimetry /1/ is the basis of this re-calibration. These foils are checked for consistency with the previously used secondary standards 1. Experimental Fischerscope XUV-S, 50 kv, 1 mm Al primary filter. Aperture Ø1 mm. The size of the primary standards is 5 cm * 5 cm. In order to get a representative mean value of the entire primary standard a scan of 8*8 readings has been performed. The WinFTM scanning mode 2 has been applied to cover a large spot by a single measurement. Since the distance affects the geometry factor, it must be fixed within a small tolerance. The Fischerscope X-ray system s autofocus tool achieves an acceptable range of about 20-50 µm. The other standard foil samples were measured in the central area of 2 mm * 2 mm by a map of 9 points. The time of a single reading is 60 s in anay case.. The foils were placed on a particular sample holder ( radiation trap ) to avoid the excitation of radiation components from the surrounding chamber. Results of re-calibration The 7 foil samples of the GN set 18761 and one additional single standard have been by the mentioned 4 new primary standards. Also the Zero (empty sample holder) has been checked. The Tab. 1 lists both the standard free results of the primary and the secondary standards. 1 Master standards (Gebrauchsnormale) which are traceable to gravimetrical masses per unit area from former calibrations. 2 The motorized table moves both in x- and y- direction with predefined velocities and predefined distances. These so-called scan parameters are defined in the WinFTM product. Here a scan area of 3 mm * 3 mm has been used. 1

Tab. 1 The standard free experimental results of the foil samples under investigation are compared with the s. The lines 2-5 depict the data of the primary reference standard foils with the s from the actual mass per unit area determination acc. to the gravimetrical procedure /1/. In the following lines secondary standards are displayed: nos. 6-12 GN set 18761 (from 2009) and nos. 14-18 GN set 15249 (from 2004). Line no 13 is a single standards from 2009. All the s refer to old style DKD calibrations. Sample / Code 1 empty sample holder 0 0,0003-2 BAU Ni 5070812 4,454 4,644-3 BAW Ni 10070812 9,026 9,58-4 BAW Ni 15070812 13,579 14,34-5 BAX Ni 25090812 22,48 23,83-6 ACXSU 0,973 0,972 0,980 0,015 7 ACXTU 1,931 1,871 1,88 0,019 8 ACXTB 2,507 2,488 2,50 0,023 9 ACXTK 4,631 4,54 4,57 0,033 10 ACXUE 6,539 6,60 6,65 0,043 11 ACXSD 18,58 17,6 18,9 0,104 12 ACXSN 22,01 20,7 23,2 0,126 13 ACLTN 5,166 5,14 5,20 0,036 14 AAXIQ 21,99 20,91 21,2 0,116 15 AAWQU 16,71 16,43 16,7 0,093 16 AAWPU 8,86 8,66 8,78 0,054 17 AAWRZ 2,54 2,49 2,52 0,023 18 AAXKG 1,02 1,01 1,026 0,015 2

Fig. 1 Deviations of the standard free experimental readings with respect to the s. The blue marks denote the new primary standards and the Zero value. The red and green ones refer to the seconsdary master standards which are calibrated now, cf. Tab. 1. The line depicts the linear correction (1.5%) based on the Zero value and the 4 new primary standard foils. Conclusion The new foil standards are in good agreement with the standard free experimental values. The mean deviation is 1.5% only, cf. the blue marked dots in Fig. 1. Both GN sets are very close to the theoretical values also, except from the thickest foil (> 20 mg/cm2) in both cases. The reason of this nonconsistency is not known. The calibration is quite stable and reliable due to the large number of primary standards. Also the good agreement with the old secondary foils (except from the 2 outliers) indicates a high level of confidence for the applied calibration of column 5 of Tab. 1. The very small estimated uncertainties (column 6 of Tab. 1, about 0.5 % ) are up to now the best accuracies for Fischer mass per unit area reference standards. The reasons are the quite good uniformity of the Ni foils and the relative large number of primary standards. 13.08.2012 References /1/ Reg. No. D-K-15076-01-00. 3

Appendix 1: Ni/Fe Ni/Cu/Fe Ni/Cu The secondary standard sets GN 18760 (Ni/Fe), GN 18762 (Ni/Cu/Fe), and GN 18759 (Ni/Cu) are recalibrated by the same procedure as applied for the self-supporting Ni foils describe above. The measurements have been performed in the same manner. The results are listed in Tabs. A1 and A2 Tab. A 1 The old 3 s and the standard free experimental results for the Ni mass per unit area of Ni/Fe samples (items 1-7 = set GN 18760 ) and Ni/Cu/Fe samples (items 8,9 = set GN 18762). The recalibration uses the same correction (+ 1.46%) of the Ni foils. Sample / Code 1 ACXSW 0,975 0,964 0,978 0,02 2 ACXTW 1,901 1,823 1,85 0,03 3 ACXTD 2,522 2,52 2,56 0,03 4 ACXTQ 4,561 4,5 4,57 0,05 5 ACXUJ 6,52 6,61 6,71 0,06 6 ACXSF 18,58 18,53 18,8 0,15 7 ACXSP 20,06 22,5 22,8 0,18 8 ACXSH 18,59 18,9 19,2 0,16 9 ACXUN 6,749 6,65 6,75 0,06 Tab. A2 The old s and the standard free experimental results for the Ni mass per unit area of Ni/Cu samples (= set GN 18759). The recalibration uses the same correction (+ 1.46%) of the Ni foils. Sample / Code 1 ACXSV 0,956 0,94 0,954 0,02 2 ACXTY 1,923 1,85 1,88 0,03 3 ACXTC 2,524 2,5 2,54 0,03 4 ACXTM 4,527 4,55 4,62 0,05 5 ACXUF 6,545 6,57 6,67 0,06 6 ACXSE 18,51 18,15 18,4 0,15 7 ACXSO 21,97 21,94 22,3 0,18 14.08.2012 3 the s refer to old style DKD calibrations. 4

Appendix 2: Ni/Fe Ni/Cu The secondary standard sets GN 15721 (Ni/Fe), GN 15723 (Ni/Cu) are by the same procedure as applied for the self-supporting Ni foils describe above. The measurements have been performed in the same manner. The results are listed in Tabs. A3 and A4 Tab. A 3 The old 4 s and the standard free experimental results for the Ni mass per unit area of Ni/Fe samples of the GN set 15721. The recalibration uses the same correction (+ 1.46%) of the Ni foils. Sample / Code 1 ABAKH 1,070 1,056 1,07 0,02 2 ABADW 2,768 2,76 2,80 0,04 3 ACLTQ 5,234 5,295 5,37 0,05 4 ABAEZ 8,775 8,853 8,98 0,08 5 ABABU 16,545 16,85 17,10 0,14 6 ABACT 22,562 22,91 23,24 0,19 7 ACLTP 5,289 5,19 5,27 0,05 Tab. A2 The old s and the standard free experimental results for the Ni mass per unit area of the GN set 15723. The recalibration uses the same correction (+ 1.46%) of the Ni foils. Sample / Code 1 ACLTR 5,291 5,325 5,40 0,05 2 ABAKF 1,039 1,02 1,03 0,02 3 ABADU 2,701 2,68 2,72 0,04 4 ACLTS 5,18 5,09 5,16 0,05 5 ABAEX 8,988 8,987 9,12 0,08 6 ABABS 16,56 16,61 16,85 0,14 7 ABACR 22,47 22,24 22,56 0,18 15.08.2012 4 the s refer to old style DKD calibrations. 5

Appendix 3: Ni/Fe The secondary standard set GN 15719 (Ni/Fe) is by the same procedure as applied for the self-supporting Ni foils describe above. The measurements have been performed in the same manner. The results are listed in Tab. A5 Tab. A 5 The old 5 s and the standard free experimental results for the Ni mass per unit area of Ni/Fe samples of the GN set 15721. The recalibration uses the same correction (+ 1.46%) of the Ni foils. The mass per unit area of the last two columns are converted into thickness values using the density ρ=8.9 g/cm 3. Sample / Code recalibrated recalibrated [µ ] [µ ] ABAKJ 1,05 1,04 1,055 0,02 46,7 1,0 ABADY 2,68 2,68 2,72 0,04 120,1 1,6 ABAFB 9,14 9,06 9,19 0,08 406,7 3,7 ABABN 16,73 16,67 16,91 0,14 748 6,2 ABACV 22,52 22,38 22,71 0,18 1005 8,1 15.08.2012 5 the s refer to old style DKD calibrations. 6