MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Report No.: B8049.01-401-18. Rendered to: AMERICAN PRODUCTS, INC Tampa, Florida



Similar documents
How To Test For An Architectural Test

ASTM E 1886 / ASTM E 1996 AND ASTM E 283, ASTM E 330, ASTM E 331 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: BEKAERT SPECIALTY FILMS, LLC

ASTM E 1886 and ASTM E 1996 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: NORSE, INC.

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Report No.: B Rendered to: CAPTIVEAIRE, INC. Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

ASTM E 1886 and ASTM E 1996 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: Atrium Companies, Inc. SERIES/MODEL: 50/305 HS PRODUCT TYPE: Vinyl Horizontal Slider

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: UNITED STATES ALUMINUM CORPORATION. SERIES/MODEL: 450 Center Glaze PRODUCT TYPE: Aluminum Curtain Wall

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: GLASSCRAFT DOOR COMPANY

TEST REPORT. Report No.: B Rendered to: CROFT, LLC. Magnolia, Mississippi. PRODUCT TYPE: Aluminum Single Hung Window SERIES/MODEL: 95

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: GLASSCRAFT DOOR COMPANY

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: INTERNATIONAL WINDOW Hayward, California. PRODUCT TYPE: Aluminum Hopper SERIES/MODEL: 7222

FM 4473 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VTECH INDUSTRIES, LLP. SERIES/MODEL: 4 x 4 CMC Hurricane PRODUCT TYPE: Skylight

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: BAMCO INC. PRODUCT TYPE: ACM Wall Panel Systems

TEST REPORT. Report No.: A Rendered to: BAMCO INC. Middlesex, New Jersey. PRODUCT TYPE: Wall Cladding System SERIES/MODEL: Dry Concept

AST M F /GSA TS01 T EST R EPO R T. Rendered to: UNI T E D ST A T ES A L U M INU M

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TFC A DIVISION OF CENTURION INDUSTRIES, INC. Garrett, Indiana

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TREMCO INCORPORATED. SERIES/MODEL: Proglaze ETA PRODUCT TYPE: Engineered Transition Assembly

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: ARCHITECTURAL METAL SOLUTIONS, INC.

MOCK-UP TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TUBELITE, INC. PROJECT: 200 Series Curtain Wall Mock-Up

UL 580 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. SERIES/MODEL: MW Vector PRODUCT TYPE: Ceiling System, 3' OC

BLOWING DUST INFILTRATION TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TEX-STAR WINDOWS, INC. PROJECT: Blowing Dust Test SERIES: 3000 Horizontal Sliding Window

AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A TEST REPORT. Rendered to: EAGLE WINDOW & DOOR COMPANY

BLOWING DUST INFILTRATION TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TEX-STAR WINDOWS, INC. PROJECT: Blowing Dust Test SERIES: 3000 Double Hung Window

ASTM E 90 SOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS TEST REPORT. Rendered to: MGM INDUSTRIES SERIES/MODEL: TYPE: Single Hung Window

NFRC THERMAL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: CR LAURENCE CO., INC. SERIES/MODEL: 7500 Concealed Vent TYPE: Projecting (Awning)

SECTION 6. Glass Storefront Doors:

ASTM E 90 SOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TUBELITE, INC. SERIES/MODEL: T TYPE: Two-Lite Storefront

Glossary. 1/3 1/3 1/3 - Configuration of a vent-fixed-vent (xox) window in which the vents and fixed panel are equal sizes

Important Information for Installer & Homeowner

Scottsdale, Arizona. Presentation by: Hermes Norero, P.E. President and CEO

n Three 4 x 4 butt hinges per door - prevents wracking and assures smooth positive operation n Heavy duty 16 gauge steel frame

SERIES 238 WINDOWS. NOTE: Read instructions completely before attempting any installation.

DE Frame with C Series Sidelight

Window Installation Instructions

Series 3502 Thermal Series 3902 Fixed Thermal Architectural Grade Horizontal Sliding Window

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: FORMTECH ENTERPRISES, INC. SERIES/MODEL: Truline PRODUCT TYPE: PVC Seawall

SECTION SERIES 1500 VINYL PATIO DOORS

Replacement Window Installation Guide Non-Impact & Impact Resistant Windows without Nailing Fin

Clad Direct Glaze Window Installation Instructions

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: DEXERDRY. For: Deck Weatherproofing System Installed with AZEK Deck Boards

WINDOW PANNING AND TRIMS

Garden Window. Montecito Series Vinyl Garden Window Architectural Manual

Residential Garage Door Terminology

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS for Vinyl Windows with Integral Nailing Fin (JII001)

Window Glass Design 5 According to ASTM E 1300

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: INTEX MILLWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. For: Rigid Cellular PVC Guardrail System Hampton RS40

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: HOMELAND VINYL PRODUCTS, INC. For:

Impact-Resistant Windows and Sliding Glass Doors

City of San Diego, CWP Guidelines

Garden Windows Builders Vinyl

Assessing Curtain Walls

BASIC FIRE DOOR REQUIREMENTS TECHNICAL DATA SHEET NO. 401

2.02. Specifications. General. Products. Execution. Offset Pivots P-694 Top and Bottom Pivots

INSTALLATION OF A BAY WINDOW

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS for Vinyl Windows without Nailing Fin (JII011) ImPOrTANT INFOrmATION & GlOssAry. rough OPeNINGs

Specifying Windows. Performance Standards

CLEAR-DIVISIONS CENTERFOLD

WINDOW REPAIR MANUAL & REFERENCE GUIDE

Heavy Glass Frameless Shower Door With Return Panel

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

Sun Windows General Information Sun New Construction Window Installation Instructions

CLEAR-DIVISIONS APERTO

CLEAR-DIVISIONS VARIOFOLD

4 5/16 Subframe Installation

WHI 90-Minute Rated Veneered Door Frame Installation Instructions

Strength, Style and Security for your home and family

HMMA 810 HOLLOW METAL DOORS HOLLOW METAL MANUAL -87 NAAMM STANDARD FOURTH EDITION METAL DOORS & FRAMES NAAMM 2 NAAMM 2 METAL DOORS & FRAMES

We urge you to read and follow the attached installation instructions. Failure to do so may void the warranty of this garden window unit.

We urge you to read and follow the attached installation instructions. Failure to do so may void the warranty of this garden window unit.

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL No CF 291 SCHOTT UK LIMITED

DuPont Tyvek Commercial Air Barrier Assemblies Exceed Air Barrier Association of America, ASHRAE 90.1

K. D. FRAME ASSEMBLY FOR CLOSED STEEL STUD WALLS...Ins 10. FRAME INSTALLATION DETAILS FOR CLOSED STEEL STUD WALLS...Ins 11

Replacement Installation Instructions

Canvas Office Landscape Wall Strip Installation and Disassembly for Recycling Instructions

AAMA Standard Practice for Installation of Windows with a Mounting Flange in Open Stud Frame Construction for Low Wind/Water Exposure

JANUARY, 2016 TR-7100 Windows (Fixed) 1 EC ALUMINUM WINDOWS Guide Specs

WATER LEAKAGE IN GLAZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMS:

RAM Industries 8600 Commerce Park Dr Houston, TX Tel: Fax:

SECTION SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS 521 SERIES ALUMINUM SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS

Open Up Your Space, Add Light Series 2050 and Series 2050i Garden Windows

SECTION ALUMINUM FRAMED ENTRANCES and STOREFRONTS. System 402 Flush-Glazed Screw Spline Storefront

Eggers meticulously-crafted door frames are rivaled only by their beauty, quality and lasting performance. Turning nature s beauty into works of art

Installation Guide for Andersen Architectural Wood Inswing Entry Doors

Wind Mitigation Inspection

Andersen Clad Inswing Entry Doors (2001 to Present)

Mark Cramer Inspection Services, Inc.

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (RAS) No. 150 PRESCRIPTIVE BUR REQUIREMENTS

Therma-Tru Slim-Line Sliding Patio Door. Assembly and Installation

SECTION AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOOR SYSTEMS. A. Automatic sliding doors with operator and motion/presence sensor control device.

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Premier & Deluxe 3-Season Room Sliding Glass Door

foot skylight) is enough to knock a worker off their feet. A 10 mph wind gust on a 5 x 6 skylight develops a wind force of 270 lbs.

March 14, Installation of Bay, Bow and Garden Windows

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. STREET ADDRESS: Gulf Blvd, Maderia Beach, FL Six story masonry residence

INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS for Vinyl Patio Doors with Integral Nailing Fin (JII006)

Installation Detailed installation instructions are provided which should be strictly followed.

Casement/Awning Window Parts Reference Catalog

Astragal: a vertical member placed at the meeting edges of a double door to provide a weather seal and may be used to anchor the fixed door.

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: LMT-Mercer Group, Inc. For: PRODUCT: 4" x 4" and 5" x 5" PVC Porch Posts with Aluminum Reinforcing

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT

Installation Instructions

Transcription:

Architectural Testing MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Report No.: B8049.01-401-18 Rendered to: AMERICAN PRODUCTS, INC Tampa, Florida PRODUCT TYPE: Aluminum Storefront with Double Doors SERIES/MODEL: 2500 HVHZ Flush glaze This report contains in its entirety: Cover Page: 1 page Report Body: 28 pages Sketches: 3 pages Drawings: 14 pages Test Dates: 06/12/12 Through: 06/21/12 Miami-Dade County Notification No.: ATI FL 12007

Page 1 of 28 1.0 Report Issued To: American Products, Inc. 13909 Lynmar Blvd. Tampa, Florida 33626 2.0 Test Laboratory: Architectural Testing, Inc. 2250 Massaro Blvd. Tampa, Florida 33619 (813) 628-4300 3.0 Project Summary: 3.1 Product Type: Aluminum Storefront with Double Doors 3.2 Series/Model: 2500 HVHZ Flush glaze 3.3 Compliance Statement: Results obtained are tested values and were secured by using the designated test methods. The samples were tested per Florida Building Code, Test Protocols for High Velocity Hurricane Zone, Protocols TAS 201-94, TAS 202-94, and TAS 203-94. The three samples tested with Sentry Glass interlayer met the performance requirements set forth in the protocols for a ±60.00 psf Design Pressure rating. 3.4 Miami-Dade County Notification No.: ATI FL 12007 3.5 Test Dates: 06/12/2012-06/21/2012 3.6 Test Location: Architectural Testing, Inc test facility in Tampa, Florida. 3.7 Test Sample Source: The test specimens were provided by the client. Representative samples of the test specimens will be retained by Architectural Testing for a minimum of ten years from the test completion date. 3.8 Drawing Reference: The test specimen drawings have been reviewed by Architectural Testing and are representative of the test specimens reported herein. Test specimen construction was verified by Architectural Testing per the drawings located in Appendix C. Any deviations are documented herein or on the drawings. 3.9 List of Official Observers: Name Company Client Name John C McClane Shawn G Collins, P.E. Scott Parker Company Architectural Testing, Inc. Architectural Testing, Inc. Architectural Testing, Inc.

Page 2 of 28 4.0 Test Specifications: TAS 201-94, Impact Test Procedures. TAS 202-94, Criteria for Testing Impact and Non Impact Resistant Building Envelope Components Using Uniform Static Air Pressure Loading. TAS 203-94, Criteria for Testing Products Subject to Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading. 5.0 Test Specimen Description: 5.1 Product Sizes: Test Unit #1 Overall Area: 188.3 ft 2 Width (inches) Height (inches) Overall size 226 120 Active door 47-1/2 95-1/2 Inactive door 47-1/2 95-1/2 Test Unit #2 (Double Doors) Overall Area: 69.1 ft 2 Width (inches) Height (inches) Overall size 101 98-1/2 Active door 47-1/2 95-1/2 Inactive door 47-1/2 95-1/2 Test Unit #3 (Double Doors with Transom) Overall Area: 80.6 ft 2 Width (inches) Height (inches) Overall size 101 115 Active door 47-1/2" 95-1/2" Inactive door 47-1/2" 95-1/2"

Page 3 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.2 Frame Construction: Test unit #1 Frame Member Material Description Sub sill Sill Head Jambs Vertical mullion (Deep pocket) Vertical mullion (Shallow pocket) Horizontal mullions Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Part #API-2550; 5-1/4 wide by 2-1/2 high back leg, secured to a concrete slab utilizing Dow 795 and 5/16 x 2-3/4" tapcons. End dams were located at each end measuring 5-1/4" wide by 2-1/2" high and secured with silicone. Part #API-2520; square cut, butted, sealed with Dow 795 silicone. The sill was secured to the sub sill utilizing 5/16" x 1-1/2" self drilling tek screws and through the jambs and vertical mullions into the screw bosses. Part #API-2510; square cut, butted and sealed with Dow 795 silicone. The head was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws through the jambs and vertical mullions into the screw bosses. Part #API-2512; square cut, secured to the head and sill screw bosses with four #12 x 1 pan head screws and the horizontal mullion was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws. Part #API-2564 and API-2511; square cut, secured to the head and sill screw bosses with four #12 x 1 pan head screws and the horizontal mullion was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws. Part #API-2564 and API-2511; square cut, secured to the head and sill screw bosses with four #12 x 1 pan head screws and the horizontal mullion was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws. Part #API-2564; The horizontal mullions were square cut and secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws through the jambs and vertical mullions into the screw bosses.

Page 4 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.2 Frame Construction: (Continued) Test unit #1 (Continued) Joinery Type Mechanically All corners fastened Detail Square cut, butted, sealed with Dow Corning 795 silicone and secured into screw boss. Test unit #2 Frame Member Material Description Head Jambs Horizontal Mullions Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Part #API-2563; square cut, butted and sealed with Dow 795 silicone. The head was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws through the jambs into the screw bosses. Part #API-2563; square cut, secured to the head screw bosses with four #12 x 1 pan head screws and the horizontal mullion was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws. Part #API-2564; The horizontal mullion was square cut and secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws through the jambs into the screw bosses. All corners Joinery Type Mechanically fastened Detail Square cut, butted, sealed with Dow Corning 795 silicone and secured into screw boss. Test unit #3 Frame Member Material Description Head Jambs Extruded aluminum Extruded aluminum Part #API-2563; square cut, butted and sealed with Dow 795 silicone. The head was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws through the jambs into the screw bosses. Part #API-2563; square cut, secured to the head screw bosses with four #12 x 1 pan head screws and the horizontal mullion was secured with three #12 x 1 pan head screws. All corners Joinery Type Mechanically fastened Detail Square cut, butted, sealed with Dow Corning 795 silicone and secured into screw boss.

Page 5 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.3 Door panel Construction: The following descriptions apply to all specimens. Panel Member Material Description Door stiles Extruded aluminum Part #API- 13216, 1217and API- 1215 Door rails Extruded aluminum Part #API- 1203 and 1213 All corners Joinery Type Mechanically fastened Detail The top and bottom door rails were square cut, and butted. The rails utilized shear blocks at each end and were secured to the rails with four #10 x 1/2" Philips head machine screws. The bottom rail was secured to the doors locking and hinge stiles utilizing two Hex head self-tapping 1" screws through the shear blocks. The top rail utilized one Hex head self-tapping 1" screws through the shear blocks. The top and bottom rails also utilized an aluminum tack weld at the top and bottom corners of each rail. 5.4 Weatherstripping Test unit #1 and #2 Description Quantity Location 0.320" high by 0.430" backed polypile 1 Row Active door locking stile Interior glazing gasket 1 Row All four sides of the glazing pocket Exterior glazing gasket 1 Row All four sides of the glazing pocket Door sweep 1 Row The bottom of each door 3/8" hollow bulb gasket 1 Row Jambs and head 1/4" hollow bulb gasket 1 Row Threshold

Page 6 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.4 Weatherstripping Test unit #3 Description Quantity Location 0.320" high by 0.430" backed polypile 1 Row Active door locking stile Door sweep 1 Row The bottom of each door 3/8" hollow bulb gasket 1 Row Jambs and head 1/4" hollow bulb gasket 1 Row Threshold 5.5 Glazing: Test Unit #1 Glass Spacer Type Type 1-1/4" IG Aluminum reinforced butyl Interior Lite Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" Sentry Glass interlayer by DuPont Exterior Lite 1/4" tempered glass Glazing Method Exterior glazed onto interior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and exterior glazing gasket. Two 4" wide by 5/8" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the sill. Three 9-1/2" long by 7/8" wide by 1/8" thick side blocks were utilized in each of the deep pockets of the jambs and vertical mullions. Double Doors Glass Type Glazing Glazing Method Monolithic Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" Sentry Glass interlayer by DuPont Interior glazed onto exterior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and interior glazing utilized a wet glaze with DOW 995. Two 2" wide by 1/4" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the bottom rail of the door leaf.

Page 7 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.5 Glazing: (Continued) Test Unit #1 Glass Type Glazing Glazing Method Monolithic Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" PVB interlayer Interior glazed onto exterior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and interior glazing utilized a wet glaze with DOW 995. Two 2" wide by 1/4" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the bottom rail of the door leaf. Location Quantity Daylight Opening Glass Bite Lower left and right lite 2 60" x 92-7/8" 3/4" Upper left and right lite 2 60" x 19" 3/4" Center upper lite 1 96" x 19" 3/4" Lower left inactive door 1 37-7/8" x 82-3/4" 3/4" Lower right active door 1 37-7/8" x 82-3/4" 3/4" Test unit #2 Double Doors with Transom Glass Spacer Interior Lite Type Type 1-1/4" IG Aluminum reinforced butyl Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" SentryGlass interlayer by DuPont Exterior Lite 1/4" tempered glass Glazing Method Exterior glazed onto interior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and exterior glazing gasket. Two 4" wide by 5/8" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the sill. Three 9-1/2" long by 7/8" wide by 1/8" thick side blocks were utilized in each of the deep pockets of the vertical mullions.

Page 8 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.5 Glazing: (Continued) Test unit #2 (Continued) Double Doors with Transom Glass Type Glazing Glazing Method Monolithic Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" Sentry Glass interlayer by DuPont Interior glazed onto exterior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and interior glazing utilized a wet glaze with DOW 995. Two 2" wide by 1/4" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the bottom rail of the door leaf. Glass Type Glazing Glazing Method Monolithic Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" PVB interlayer Interior glazed onto exterior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and interior glazing utilized a wet glaze with DOW 995. Two 2" wide by 1/4" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the bottom rail of the door leaf. Test unit #2 Location Quantity Daylight Opening Glass Bite Center upper lite 1 96" x 19" 3/4" Lower left inactive door 1 37-7/8" x 82-3/4" 3/4" Lower right active door 1 37-7/8" x 82-3/4" 3/4" Test unit #3 Double Doors Glass Type Glazing Glazing Method Monolithic Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" Sentry Glass interlayer by DuPont Interior glazed onto exterior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and interior glazing utilized a wet glaze with DOW 995. Two 2" wide by 1/4" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the bottom rail of the door leaf.

Page 9 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.5 Glazing: (Continued) Test unit #3 (Continued) Double Doors Glass Type Glazing Glazing Method Monolithic Two sheets of 1/4" heat strengthened glass separated by 0.090" PVB interlayer by Oldcastle Interior glazed onto exterior glazing gasket and secured with snap-in glazing bead and interior glazing utilized a wet glaze with DOW 995. Two 2" wide by 1/4" high by 1-1/4" deep setting blocks located at quarter points from the edge of the glass were utilized at the bottom rail of the door leaf. Location Quantity Daylight Opening Glass Bite Lower left inactive door 1 37-7/8" x 82-3/4" 3/4" Lower right active door 1 37-7/8" x 82-3/4" 3/4" 5.5 Drainage: Test unit #1 Drainage Method Size Quantity Location Weep hole 5/16" 4 Water diverter 1-1/4" wide by 1-1/2" long 7/8" wide by 2" deep Sub-sill 7" from each end and 9" each side of vertical mullions, through the first two vertical walls. 6 Each end of horizontal mullions. Open glazing Each end of sill and horizontal 10 pocket ends mullions members. Threshold 96" x 5" 1 The bottom of the double doors Test unit #2 and #3 Drainage Method Size Quantity Location Threshold 96" x 5" 1 The bottom of the double doors

Page 10 of 28 5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued) 5.6 Hardware: The following descriptions apply to all specimens. Description Quantity Location Part #MS1851SW-310-628 Located 40" from the bottom of the active 1 Deadbolt lock door leaf Part #4015-18-IB Threshold Located at the bottom of the active door leaf 1 bolt locking stile Part #4016-30-02 2-point Located at the top of the active door leaf 1 lock (header Bolt) stile Part #FB-2210A-18 2 Located at the top and bottom of the inactive door leaf stile Part #4066-130 thumb turn 1 Located 40" up from the bottom of the active door leaf locking stile Part #4036-01-628 standard Located 40" up from the bottom of the active 1 cylinder door leaf locking stile Located 9-1/2", 35-3/8", 61-1/4" and 87" Part #1191 4-1/2" x 4" 4 from the bottom of the active door leaf hinge hinge stile Part #780-112-95 continuous hinge Pat #BF-15747-45 2 5.7 Reinforcement: No reinforcement was utilized. 5.8 Screen Construction: No screen was utilized. 6.0 Installation: 1 Full length of the inactive door leaf hinge stile Two 10" exterior pull handles located 34" and 44-1/4" from the bottom of both active and inactive door leaf at the locking stiles. Two 45" push bars on the interior side of both door leaves 44-1/4" up from the bottom of each door. Test unit #1 The specimen was installed into a C8 steel C-channel and plywood chamber with an interior perimeter of a nominal double 2 x 8 southern yellow pine lumber wrap. The rough opening allowed for a 3/8" shim space at the top and jambs. The exterior and interior perimeter of the storefront wall was sealed with Dow 795.

Page 11 of 28 6.0 Installation: (Continued) Test unit #1 (Continued) Location Anchor Description Anchor Location Head Sub sill Sill Threshold 5/16" x 3-3/4" Tapcons 5/16" x 2-3/4" Tapcons 5/16" x 1-1/2" selfdrilling pan head screw 5/16" x 2-3/4" Tapcons Four anchors 1-1/2" in from each jamb and each side of the vertical mullions 3" on center into the wood header. The center transom head utilized an additional two anchors 32" in from each vertical mullion. Four anchors 1-1/2" in from each jamb and each side of the vertical mullions 3" on center into the concrete slab. Four anchors 1-1/2" in from each jamb and each side of the vertical mullions 1-1/2" on center into the sub sill. Eight anchors 6" in from each vertical mullion 12" on center into the concrete slab. Test unit #2 and #3 The specimen was installed into a C8 steel C-channel. The rough opening allowed for a 3/8" shim space at the top and jambs. The exterior and interior perimeter of the double doors and were sealed with Dow 795. Test unit#2 Location Anchor Description Anchor Location Head Jambs Threshold 5/16" x 2-3/4" Tek screws 5/16" x 2-3/4" Tek screws 5/16" x 2-3/4" Tapcons Four anchors 1-1/2" in from each jamb and 3" on center with an additional two anchors 32" in from each jamb through the C-8 steel channel. 5" from the bottom of the jamb and 12" on center up to the horizontal mullion where two screws were located 3" apart above and below the mullion. Eight anchors 6" in from each jamb and 12" on center into the concrete slab. Test unit#3 Location Anchor Description Anchor Location Head 5/16" x 2-3/4" Tek screws 5" from each end and 12" on center Jamb 5/16" x 2-3/4" Tek 5" from the bottom of the jamb and 12" on screws center Threshold 5/16" x 2-3/4" Eight anchors 6" in from each vertical mullion Tapcons 12" on center into the concrete slab.

Page 12 of 28 7.0 Test Results: The temperature during testing was 78 F. The results are tabulated as follows: Protocol TAS 202-94, Static Air Pressure Tests Test Unit #1 Design Pressure: 60.0 psf Title of Test Results Air Infiltration at 1.57 psf (25 mph) 0.18 cfm/ft 2 Air Infiltration at 6.24 psf (50 mph) 0.40 cfm/ft 2 Indicator Reading (inches) Structural Loads 50% of Test Pressure (+45.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.21 0.42 0.05 0.38 0.61 0.40 Permanent Set 0.05 0.03 <0.01 0.04 0.05 0.06 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 0.83 0.97 0.12 0.43 0.61 0.71 Permanent Set 0.06 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.06 Design Pressure (+60.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.52 0.92 0.11 0.86 1.34 0.94 Permanent Set 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.10 0.14 0.17 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 1.62 1.87 0.21 0.96 1.30 1.48 Permanent Set 0.16 0.11 0.02 0.10 0.12 0.14 50% of Test Pressure (-45.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.62 0.86 0.13 0.89 1.28 1.00 Permanent Set 0.20 0.18 0.06 0.28 0.37 0.41 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 1.49 1.69 0.47 0.97 1.34 1.52 Permanent Set 0.40 0.26 0.08 0.27 0.34 0.40

Page 13 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Test Unit #1 (Continued) Design Pressure: 60.0 psf Indicator Reading (inches) Design Pressure (-60.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.81 1.15 0.20 1.17 1.68 1.31 Permanent Set 0.37 0.22 0.09 0.22 0.43 0.47 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 1.97 2.24 0.55 1.27 1.78 2.00 Permanent Set 0.47 0.33 0.13 0.32 0.40 0.47 Water Infiltration 15% Positive Design Pressure (+9.0 psf) See note #1 Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #1 for indicator locations. Note#1: Water entered in between the right side vertical mullion/door hinge jamb and sill joinery 5 minutes into the test. (Interior view)

Page 14 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 202-94, Static Air Pressure Tests Test Unit #1 (retest) Design Pressure: 60.0 psf Title of Test Results Air Infiltration at 1.57 psf (25 mph) 0.17 cfm/ft 2 Air Infiltration at 6.24 psf (50 mph) 0.39 cfm/ft 2 Indicator Reading (inches) Structural Loads 50% of Test Pressure (+45.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.55 0.78 0.06 0.82 1.21 0.92 Permanent Set 0.18 0.12 0.03 0.18 0.24 0.27 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 1.37 1.54 0.15 0.87 1.18 1.29 Permanent Set 0.24 0.16 0.03 0.17 0.21 0.23 Design Pressure (+60.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.70 1.05 0.08 1.05 1.59 1.20 Permanent Set 0.20 0.16 0.03 0.20 0.28 0.31 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 1.75 2.04 0.19 1.13 1.53 1.67 Permanent Set 0.27 0.19 0.04 0.20 0.24 0.27 50% of Test Pressure (-45.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.65 0.86 0.12 0.93 1.37 1.07 Permanent Set 0.24 0.16 0.06 0.24 0.34 0.38 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 1.49 1.76 0.42 0.94 1.39 1.51 Permanent Set 0.34 0.26 0.10 0.22 0.30 0.34

Page 15 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Test Unit #1 (Retest) (Continued) Design Pressure: 60.0 psf Indicator Reading (inches) Design Pressure (-60.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.76 1.10 0.16 1.14 1.70 1.32 Permanent Set 0.25 0.18 0.09 0.27 0.38 0.41 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 1.85 2.23 0.48 1.17 1.72 1.88 Permanent Set 0.40 0.30 0.13 0.24 0.33 0.37 Water Infiltration 15% Positive Design Pressure (+9.0 psf) No Penetration Test Pressure (+90.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.95 1.50 0.11 1.47 2.35 1.76 Permanent Set 0.23 0.17 0.03 0.23 0.35 0.41 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 2.54 2.96 0.24 1.60 2.20 2.46 Permanent Set 0.36 0.26 0.04 0.23 0.32 0.35 Test Pressure (-90.0 psf) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Maximum Deflection 0.70 1.47 0.22 1.31 2.13 1.57 Permanent Set 0.12 0.10 0.05 0.13 0.18 0.15 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 Maximum Deflection 2.37 3.11 0.60 1.47 2.34 2.36 Permanent Set 0.21 0.17 0.07 0.14 0.21 0.23 Forced Entry - 300 lb Pull Test Pass Notes: Vertical mullions do not meet L/180 for deflection See Architectural Testing Sketch #1 for indicator locations.

Page 16 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 201-94, Impact Test Procedures Missile Weight: 9.25 lbs Missile Length: 8' 1" Muzzle Distance from Test Specimen: 17' 0" Test Unit #1: Impact #1: Missile Velocity: 49.5 fps Impact Area: Left Fixed Light, center of glazing Missile hit target area, fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #2: Missile Velocity: 50.3 fps Impact Area: Left Fixed Light, upper right corner of the glazing Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #3: Missile Velocity: 50.0 fps Impact Area: Right Fixed Light, lower left corner of the glazing Missile hit target area, fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #4: Missile Velocity: 49.9 fps Impact Area: Right Fixed Light, center of glazing Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #2 for impact locations.

Page 17 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 201-94, Impact Test Procedures Missile Weight: 9.25 lbs Missile Length: 8' 1" Muzzle Distance from Test Specimen: 17' 0" Test Unit #1: Impact #5: Missile Velocity: 50.0 fps Impact Area: Active door, upper right corner of the glazing Missile hit target area, fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #6: Missile Velocity: 50.3 fps Impact Area: Active door, center of glazing Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #7: Missile Velocity: 50.1 fps Impact Area: Right vertical mullion, center shot Observations: Missile hit target area, dented the aluminum Results: Pass Impact #8: Missile Velocity: 50.7 fps Impact Area: Center of active door locking stile above the lock. Missile hit target area, dented the aluminum no Observations: disengagement Results: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #2 for impact locations.

Page 18 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 201-94, Impact Test Procedures Missile Weight: 9.25 lbs Missile Length: 8' 1" Muzzle Distance from Test Specimen: 17' 0" Test Unit #1: Impact #9: Missile Velocity: 50.8 fps Impact Area: Inactive door leaf, center of bottom rail Observations: Missile hit target area, dented aluminum Results: Pass Impact #10: Missile Velocity: 50.9 fps Center of the horizontal mullion above the double Impact Area: doors Observations: Missile hit target area, dented the aluminum Results: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #2 for impact locations Inactive door impact SGP Interlayer Impact #11: Missile Velocity: 50.1 fps Impact Area: Inactive door leaf, lower right corner Missile hit target area,, fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #12: Missile Velocity: 50.3 fps Impact Area: Active door, center of glazing Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass

Page 19 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 201-94, Impact Test Procedures Missile Weight: 9.20 lbs Missile Length: 7'2" Muzzle Distance from Test Specimen: 17' 0" Test Unit #2: (Double Door with Transom) Impact #1: Missile Velocity: 50.1 fps Impact Area: Active door leaf, upper right corner of the glazing Missile hit target area, Fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #2: Missile Velocity: 50.3 fps Between the active and inactive door stiles 3" Impact Area: above the lock Observations: Missile hit target area, dented the aluminum Results: Pass Impact #3: Missile Velocity: 50.1 fps Impact Area: Center glazing on the active door Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #4: Missile Velocity: 49.9 fps Impact Area: Center of horizontal mullion Observations: Missile hit target area, dented the aluminum Results: Pass

Page 20 of 28 7.0Test Results: (Continued) Test unit#2: (Double Door with Transom) (Continued) Impact #5: Missile Velocity: 50.3 fps Impact Area: Inactive door leaf, upper right corner of the glazing Missile hit target area, Fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #6: Missile Velocity: 49.9 fps Impact Area: Center glazing on the inactive door Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #7: Missile Velocity: 50.1 fps Impact Area: Inactive door leaf, center of bottom rail Observations: Missile hit target area, dented the aluminum Results: Pass Impact #8: Missile Velocity: 50.0 fps Between the active and inactive door stiles 3" Impact Area: above the lock Observations: Missile hit target area, dented the aluminum Results: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #3 for impact locations.

Page 21 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 201-94, Impact Test Procedures Missile Weight: 9.20 lbs Missile Length: 7' 2-1/2" Muzzle Distance from Test Specimen: 17' 0" Test Unit #3: (Double Door) Impact #1: Missile Velocity: 50.3 fps Impact Area: Active door leaf center of glazing Missile hit target area, fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #2: Missile Velocity: 50.5 fps Impact Area: Active door leaf upper right corner of the glazing Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #3: Missile Velocity: 50.4 fps Impact Area: Inactive door leaf center of the glazing Missile hit target area, fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Impact #4: Missile Velocity: 50.4 fps Impact Area: Inactive door leaf lower right corner of the glazing Missile hit target area, re-fractured the laminated Observations: glass with no penetration Results: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #4 for impact locations.

Page 22 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading Test Unit #1 Design Pressure: ±60.0 psf Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles POSITIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 12.0 to 30.0 3500 2.90 0.60 0.78 0.10 0.80 0.98 0.77 0.0 to 36.0 300 4.20 0.59 0.79 0.09 0.75 1.10 0.85 30.0 to 48.0 600 4.40 0.83 1.09 0.11 1.05 1.56 1.21 18.0 to 60.0 100 6.00 1.02 1.32 0.12 1.29 1.91 1.48 Permanent Set (inches) 0.02 0.30 0.07 0.20 0.30 0.32 Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles POSITIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 12.0 to 30.0 3500 2.90 1.14 1.23 0.09 0.75 1.05 1.02 0.0 to 36.0 300 4.20 1.26 1.40 0.10 0.84 1.18 1.16 30.0 to 48.0 600 4.40 1.73 1.95 0.14 1.17 1.61 1.63 18.0 to 60.0 100 6.00 2.08 2.37 0.16 1.43 1.94 1.98 Permanent Set (inches) 0.32 0.27 0.01 0.22 0.36 0.26 Observations: No additional damage or deglazing was observed. Result: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #1 for indicator locations.

Page 23 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading Test Unit #1 Design Pressure: ±60.0 psf Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles NEGATIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 18.0 to 60.0 50 4.30 0.66 1.10 0.25 1.14 1.81 1.48 30.0 to 48.0 1050 3.10 0.62 0.97 0.24 1.03 1.62 1.34 0.0 to 36.0 50 2.90 0.54 0.79 0.22 0.92 1.41 1.19 12.0 to 30.0 3350 2.80 0.56 0.82 0.22 0.89 1.38 1.17 Permanent Set (inches) 0.25 0.24 0.17 0.35 0.48 0.54 Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles NEGATIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 18.0 to 60.0 50 4.30 2.07 2.69 0.52 1.20 1.98 1.97 30.0 to 48.0 1050 3.10 1.87 2.39 0.49 1.09 1.78 1.77 0.0 to 36.0 50 2.90 1.63 2.07 0.45 0.96 1.57 1.54 12.0 to 30.0 3350 2.80 1.61 2.02 0.44 0.94 1.53 1.52 Permanent Set (inches) 0.59 0.60 0.27 0.32 0.52 0.53 Observations: No additional damage or deglazing was observed. Result: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #1for indicator locations.

Page 24 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading Test Unit #2 Design Pressure: ±60.0 psf Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles POSITIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 12.0 to 30.0 3500 2.99 0.08 0.33 0.16 0.63 1.10 0.14 0.0 to 36.0 300 4.90 0.08 0.34 0.16 0.63 1.10 0.14 30.0 to 48.0 600 2.87 0.14 0.48 0.16 0.80 1.50 0.19 18.0 to 60.0 100 4.80 0.16 0.60 0.16 0.95 1.82 0.21 Pressure Range (psf) Number of Cycles Permanent Set (inches) 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.10 POSITIVE PRESSURE Average Cycle Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Time (seconds) #7 #8 #9 12.0 to 30.0 3500 2.99 0.49 0.39 0.12 0.0 to 36.0 300 4.90 0.49 0.39 0.12 30.0 to 48.0 600 2.87 0.65 0.52 0.16 18.0 to 60.0 100 4.80 0.79 0.63 0.20 Permanent Set (inches) 0.12 0.10 0.05 Observations: About 300 cycles into the 50% to80% of the positive pressures the upper right corner impact area on the active door leaf deglazed from the door top rail. The door was boarded up and the testing was continued, No additional damage or deglazing was observed. Result: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #5 for indicator locations.

Page 25 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading Test Unit #2 Design Pressure: ±60.0 psf Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles NEGATIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 18.0 to 60.0 50 7.50 0.21 0.68 0.18 0.99 2.07 0.42 30.0 to 48.0 1050 3.43 0.19 0.59 0.16 0.88 1.80 0.39 0.0 to 36.0 50 6.18 0.15 0.44 0.12 0.68 1.39 0.32 12.0 to 30.0 3350 2.82 0.12 0.37 0.10 0.59 1.18 0.29 Permanent Set (inches) 0.07 0.16 0.09 0.21 0.36 0.15 Pressure Range (psf) Number of Cycles NEGATIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #7 #8 #9 18.0 to 60.0 50 7.50 1.21 0.99 0.30 30.0 to 48.0 1050 3.43 1.08 0.90 0.29 0.0 to 36.0 50 6.18 0.87 0.72 0.25 12.0 to 30.0 3350 2.82 0.78 0.64 0.24 Permanent Set (inches) 0.36 0.32 0.19 Observations: No additional damage or deglazing was observed. Result: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #5 for indicator locations

Page 26 of 28 7.0 Test Results: (Continued) Protocol TAS 203-94, Cyclic Wind Pressure Loading Test Unit #3 Design Pressure: ±60.0 psf Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles POSITIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 12.0 to 30.0 3500 3.07 0.14 0.29 0.25 0.29 0.91 0.22 0.0 to 36.0 300 3.24 0.04 0.11 0.10 0.17 0.87 0.13 30.0 to 48.0 600 3.20 0.06 0.13 0.13 0.21 1.13 0.16 18.0 to 60.0 100 5.32 0.08 0.15 0.17 0.24 1.40 0.18 Permanent Set (inches) 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.04 Pressure Range psf Number of Cycles NEGATIVE PRESSURE Average Maximum Deflection at Indicator (inches) Cycle Time (seconds) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 18.0 to 60.0 50 3.07 0.24 0.59 0.38 0.34 1.73 0.48 30.0 to 48.0 1050 2.71 0.24 0.54 0.34 0.31 1.50 0.45 0.0 to 36.0 50 3.62 0.21 0.44 0.29 0.25 1.20 0.38 12.0 to 30.0 3350 3.02 0.22 0.41 0.26 0.23 1.06 0.35 Permanent Set (inches) 0.15 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.31 0.19 Observations: No additional damage or deglazing was observed. Result: Pass Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #6 for indicator locations

Page 27 of 28 8.0 Test Equipment Cannon: Constructed from steel piping utilizing compressed air to propel the missile Missile: 2x4 Southern Pine Timing Device: Electronic Beam Type Cycling Mechanism: Computer controlled centrifugal blower with electronic pressure measuring device Deflection Measuring Device: Linear transducers, 9.0 Laboratory Compliance Statements: The following are provided as required by the protocols for the testing reported herein. Upon completion of testing, specimens tested for TAS 201-94 met the requirements of Section 1626 of the Florida Building Code, Building (2010) Upon completion of testing, specimens tested for TAS 202-94 met the requirements of Section 1620 of the Florida Building Code, Building (2010). Upon completion of testing, specimens tested for TAS 203-94 met the requirements of Section 1626 of the Florida Building Code, Building (2010) Sentry Glass interlayer only. Tape and film were used to seal against air leakage during structural testing. opinion, the tape and film did not influence the results of the test. In our

Test Report No.: B8049.01-401-18 Page 28 of 28 The service life of this report will expire on the stated Test Record Retention End Date, at which time such materials as drawings, data sheets, samples of test specimens, copies of this report, and any other pertinent project documentation, shall be discarded without notice. If test specimen contains glazing, no conclusions of any kind regarding the adequacy or inadequacy of the glass in any glazed test specimens can be made. This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. It is the exclusive property of the client so named herein and relates only to the specimens tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Architectural Testing, Inc. For ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, Inc. John C. McClane Laboratory Manager Shawn G. Collins, P.E. Manager-Regional Operations JCM:sgc:asm Attachments (pages): This report is complete only when all attachments listed are included. Appendix-A: Sketches (3) Appendix-B: Drawings (14) This report produced from controlled document template ATI 00501, issued 06/10/11.

Appendix A Sketches

1 2 3 4 2 3 6 5 1 4 5 6 # * * INDICATES AN FBC SECTION 1626 REQUIREMENT INDICATOR LOCATION INDICATES IMPACT SEQUENCE INDICATES LARGE MISSILE IMPACT LOCATION INDICATOR AND L.M.I LOCATIONS SCALE:NTS Architectural Testing

4 1 2 3 7 8 9 4 5 1 6 2 5 3 7 6 # * * INDICATES AN FBC SECTION 1626 REQUIREMENT INDICATOR LOCATION INDICATES IMPACT SEQUENCE INDICATES LARGE MISSILE IMPACT LOCATION INDICATOR AND L.M.I LOCATIONS SCALE:NTS Architectural Testing

1 12 4 5 6 2 10 11 12 7 5 7 2 1 11 4 8 8 6 10 9 9 3 3 # * * INDICATES AN FBC SECTION 1626 REQUIREMENT INDICATOR LOCATION INDICATES IMPACT SEQUENCE INDICATES LARGE MISSILE IMPACT LOCATION INDICATOR AND L.M.I LOCATIONS SCALE:NTS Architectural Testing

Appendix B Drawings