March 2008. Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District. 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA 92618. Contact: Natalie Likens (949) 453-5633



Similar documents
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

CEQA PRACTICUM: SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits

8. The City received a $100,000 grant from the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District to conduct initial planning and engineering analyses.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Restoration Program Design Review Group. Project Summary Outline

Subsidence Mitigation Through Rice Cultivation Research Project Goals:

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS AND APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN OF THE GENOME LAUNCH FACILITY PROJECT, DAVIS CAMPUS

CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

BLOCK 400 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT

San Francisco Water Powe Sewer Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Northern Nevada Water Planning Commission

2011 Operations, Maintenance, Monitoring and Rehabilitation Plan

Peters Canyon Channel (OCFCD Facility No. F06) from Confluence with San Diego Creek Channel (F05) to downstream Barranca Parkway

Sec. 22a-1a page 1 (4-97)

ADDENDUM TO THE DRAFT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE OTAY TARPLANT

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: July 11, 2013

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

~~~~A~~O~F~~~UF~OR~N~~~-~~~E~RE~SO~U~~~ES~A~GE~Na~============================================~A~RN=O~~~SC~H~WA~~=E=NE=GG=E~~~=~~

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

SR 89/Fanny Bridge Community Revitalization Project. Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Assessment

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

Post-Flood Assessment

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Vallecitos Water District Rock Springs Sewer Replacement Project

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

Otay Ranch Phase 2 Resource Management Plan

Draft Program Environmental Impact Report

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Prioritizing Riparian Restoration at the Watershed, Reach and Site Scales. Richard R. Harris University of California, Berkeley Cooperative Extension

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (FASTC) U.S. General Services Administration U.S. Department of State

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

INNOVATIONS IN STREAM RESTORATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DESIGN MEETING FLOOD CAPACITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS ON SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK 1

Chapter 3 Planning Issues, Opportunities, and Constraints

5. Environmental Analysis

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. North San Diego Water Reuse Coalition Regional Recycled Water Project Program Environmental Impact Report

The project site lies within an AE Zone and portions lie within the regulated floodway. Development of this site is subject to TCLUO, Section

Coastal Management Definitions

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

CHAPTER 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

River Restoration Activities in the Rio Grande Canalization Flood Control Project. Upper Rio Grande Citizens Forum Elizabeth Verdecchia July 19, 2012

Draft Environmental Impact Statement. PORT OF OSWEGO AUTHORITY Lead Agency, State Environmental Quality Review Act

Southwest Florida Water Management District. Environmental Resource Permit Applications within the Southwest Florida Water Management District

6.0 Results of Risk Analyses

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

S.0 Executive Summary

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE

Bowmanville Marsh Habitat Restoration and Public Access Project

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Goal 1 To protect the public health, safety and property from the harmful effects of natural disasters.

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

Low Impact Development Checklist

APPENDIX E SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY IRWM PLAN LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM NON-AGENCY ORGANIZATIONS, COMMUNITY GROUPS, AND OTHERS

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

CHECKLIST ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I. TYPE AND PURPOSE OF ACTION II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

OVERVIEW MIDDLE CREEK FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT October 3, 2012 INTRODUCTION

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

WEST MISSION AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN (Council Approved 11/5/03 - Resolution R)

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

Chapter Impacts of the Proposed Project

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Package Treatment Plant Policy and Procedure

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk

Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. CIVL 1112 Detention Ponds - Part 1 1/12

MIDDLE CREEK, LAKE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT GUIDELINES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

ATTACHMENT 9. I. Description of the Project and its Relationship to Other Projects in the Proposal

Monitoring Riparian Areas With a Camera

Transcription:

ADDENDUM TO THE MICHELSON WATER RECLAMATION PLANT PHASE 2 & 3 CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT FEBRUARY 2006 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND THE SAN JOAQUIN FRESHWATER MARSH ENHANCEMENT PLAN REVISED SEPTEMBER 1995 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT March 2008 Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue Irvine, CA 92618 Contact: Natalie Likens (949) 453-5633

PROJECT BACKGROUND The City of Irvine revised and certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan in September 1995 (SCH # 1994021027). This EIR analyzed the environmental consequences associated with implementation and construction of improvements included in the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan and associated projects, described in the report. In February 2006, IRWD certified the FEIR for the Michelson Water Reclamation Plant (MWRP/plant) Phase 2 and Phase 3 Capacity Expansion Project (SCH # 2005051174). This project involved the expansion of the existing MWRP capacity using conventional activated sludge and gravity filtration processes to meet projected future IRWD recycled water needs. (The FEIR for the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan and the FEIR for the Michelson Water Reclamation Plant (MWRP) Phase 2 and Phase 3 Capacity Expansion Project are collectively referred to herein as the FEIRs. ) This addendum, prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and its implementing Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq.), addresses construction of permanent flood protection facilities at the MWRP and associated facilities. PROJECT LOCATION The MWRP is located at 3512 Michelson Drive, City of Irvine, Orange County, California (see Figure 1- Regional Map). The IRWD property, containing both the MWRP site and the San Joaquin Marsh, is bounded by Michelson Drive, the San Diego Creek Channel, Campus Drive, and Carlson Avenue. The site is generally flat varying between 10 and 15 feet above mean sea level (msl). A 15 to 20 foot high earthen levee exists along the southeastern extremity of the plant separating the site from the San Diego Creek Channel. Access to the site is via IRWD s private drive, Riparian View ). The property is located in an area characterized by mixed land uses, including recreational, light commercial, institutional and residential use (Figure 2-Vicinity Map). The plant contains office buildings, vehicle garages and other operational structures, as well as parking lots and treatment ponds. The San Joaquin Marsh contains wetland habitats, open water areas and riparian habitats. Between the IRWD plant, Campus Drive to the west and the riparian habitat to the north, are the duck ponds operated and maintained by IRWD. Southwest of the plant, within the Marsh, is an interpretive/learning center, which is operated by the Sea and Sage Audubon Society. Along the east side of Campus Drive is a flat upland, separated from the duck ponds by berms. 1

DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATIONS TO PROJECT IRWD has performed a preliminary evaluation of the potential flooding risks to the Plant, the IRWD San Joaquin Marsh Duck Club Campus, the San Joaquin Marsh pump station, and the University Lift Station (IRWD facilities), which are all located in the City of Irvine, south of the Interstate-405 freeway. The flood risk to these IRWD facilities is associated with the potential overtopping of the adjacent channel. The channel presently flows from east to west along the southerly perimeter of the IRWD facilities, with the exception of the university lift station which is located downstream of MacArthur boulevard to the east of the channel. The channel is comprised of an earthen conveyance section with various degrees of vegetative growth along the channel embankments and bottom. The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) has identified commitments in regard to the restoration of 100-year flood capacity in the Sand Diego Creek Channel. IRWD has determined that in addition to the protection that will be afforded by OCFCD s restoration and maintenance, it is desirable to have facility-specific permanent flood protection on IRWD s property. IRWD plans to have the following permanent flood protection facilities in place at the MWRP and associated facilities (IRWD Floodwall Figure 3). IRWD proposes to construct permanent flood walls around the MWRP that will provide an estimated 200-year flood protection. The installation of slope reinforcement matting or similar functioning material to be situated between the MWRP and the IRWD San Joaquin Marsh Duck Club Campus for the purpose of protecting the San Diego Creek levee segment against erosion from overflow. The construction of permanent flood walls around the San Joaquin Marsh Pump Station and University Lift Station to provide increased flood protection. The floodwall shall be designed so that the non-project portions of the channel would not experience adverse flooding effects due to the construction of the floodwall. When complete, the floodwall improvements shall allow for continued access to all facilities by means of removable floodwall segments. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS This construction of the floodwall does not modify the impact analysis of the two referenced Environmental Impact Reports. The modification of the project to include permanent flood protection facilities will have no significant adverse environmental impacts. To ensure that no significant environmental impacts would occur, the permanent flood protection facilities would adhere to all environmental commitments and mitigation measures included in the previously certified FEIR s for the Michelson Water Reclamation Plant Phase 2 & Phase 3 Expansion Project and San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Enhancement Plan. 1

AESTHETICS The plant contains office buildings, vehicle garages and other operational structures, as well as parking lots and treatment ponds. The marsh consists primarily of a series of diked ponds, upland and riparian zones, and freshwater marsh thick with cattail and bulrush vegetation. No scenic highways are located within the project vicinity. No recreational facilities would be built or expanded as a result of the proposed permanent flood protection facilities. Facilities would not extend into public neighborhood or regional parks. The permanent flood protection facilities site is located within the existing boundaries of IRWD s property and on an OCFCD easement. The permanent flood protection facilities would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Rather, the proposed change within the project site would provide a visual barrier to the Plant. With the mitigation measures incorporated in the FEIR s, the permanent flood protection facilities would have a less than significant impact on aesthetic resources. AIR QUALITY There will be a minor increase in some potential effects identified in the two FEIR s, due to the additional construction activities related to the construction of the floodwall improvements. The construction period is estimated at six to nine months. With the mitigation measures incorporated into the projects pursuant to the FEIR s, these effects will be reduced to less than significant. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The permanent flood protection facilities would occur entirely within the existing footprint of IRWD s property and on an OCFCD easement. No acquisition or alteration of additional land would be necessary. All work would occur along existing dirt roads, along areas devoid of vegetation or within landscaped areas. No native vegetation removal would occur as part of the project. Therefore, no direct or permanent impacts to sensitive plant species, sensitive plant communities, or jurisdictional waters would result due to the proposed permanent flood protection facilities. San Diego Creek is located adjacent to the project site but no direct impacts would occur to San Diego Creek. San Diego Creek is a flood control channel and all un-vegetated open water within the channel and inflow and outflow structures are mapped as flood control channel. There will be a minor increase in potential effects identified in the FEIR s, due to the additional construction activities related to the construction of the floodwall improvements. Impacts associated with the proposed flood protection facilities would be mitigated according to existing biological mitigation measures (MM s) included in the FEIR s. As a result, potential impacts will be less than significant. 2

CULTURAL RESOURCES In 2001, the Chambers Group conducted a test program at archaeological site CA-ORA-196/H in Irvine, Orange County to determine whether intact cultural deposits would be impacted by the construction of a road accessing the Michelson Water Reclamation Plant (MWRP) located in the San Joaquin Marsh area of Irvine, south of Michelson Drive. The proposed permanent flood protection facilities are not in the location of the recorded archaeological sites. Therefore, as a result of the environmental commitments listed in each FEIR and incorporated into the proposed permanent flood protection facilities, other potential impacts will be less than significant. There will be a minor increase in potential effects identified in the FEIR s, due to the additional construction activities related to the construction of the floodwall improvements. The construction period is estimated at six to nine months. As a result of the environmental commitments incorporated into the projects pursuant to the FEIR s, potential impacts will be less than significant. GEOLOGY AND SOILS There will be a minor increase in environmental impacts due to the additional construction activities related to the construction of the floodwall improvements. The construction period is estimated at six to nine months. With the environmental commitments and mitigation measures incorporated into the FEIR s, these effects will be reduced to less than significant. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Environmental commitments (EC) were established in the MWRP FEIR to serve as a backup measure of protection to the Orange County Flood Control District s (OCFCD) future restoration of 100 year flood protection to the San Diego Creek channel. IRWD has determined in addition to the protection that will be afforded by OCFCD s restoration and maintenance, it is desirable to have facility-specific permanent flood protection facilities on IRWD s property. The permanent flood protection facilities would result in less than significant impacts to hydrology and water quality, requiring no mitigation. Adherence to the environmental commitments listed in the EIR would reduce potential impacts to hydrology and water quality to less than significant. NOISE Indirect impacts could potentially occur to birds nesting in habitat/vegetation adjacent the work area as a result of light, noise and other construction related disturbance. Sensitive wildlife that could potentially be impacted by light, noise and other construction related disturbances include least Bell s vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher. Potential indirect impacts will be reduced to less than significant by limiting construction activities to the period outside of the bird nesting season or alternatively, by implementing existing environmental commitments specified in the FEIR s. 3

When complete, the floodwall improvements shall allow for continued access to all facilities by means of removable floodwall segments. The permanent flood protection facilities would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. LAND USE AND PLANNING The proposed permanent flood protection facilities would have no significant impacts to land use. It is consistent with the City of Irvine General Plan and zoning designations for the site. The proposed permanent flood protection facilities are not related to land use, and no new impacts would occur. GROWTH INDUCING No housing or commercial facilities were related to the permanent flood protection facilities. No modification to land use or zoning designations to permit new residential or commercial development would occur. The proposed permanent flood protection facilities would not create any significant impacts regarding population, employment and housing. No impacts to population and housing resources would occur as a result of the proposed permanent flood protection facilities. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY There will be a minor increase in potential effects identified in the FEIR s due to the additional construction activities related to the construction of the floodwall improvements. The construction period is estimated at six to nine months. With the environmental commitments and mitigation measures incorporated into the projects pursuant to the FEIR s, these effects will be reduced to less than significant. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION The proposed permanent flood protection facilities will not have an adverse effect on the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or result in the need for new or physically altered government facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives. There will be a minor increase in potential effects identified in the FEIR s, due to the additional construction activities related to the construction of the floodwall improvements. The construction period is estimated at six to nine months. As a result of the environmental commitments incorporated into the proposed permanent flood protection facilities, potential impacts will be less than significant, requiring no mitigation. 4

DETERMINATION Based on the information and analysis in this addendum, and pursuant to section 15162 of the state CEQA guidelines, the District has determined that: 1. There are no substantial changes to the project that will require major revisions to the FEIR s due to new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts identified in the FEIR s; 2. Substantial changes have not occurred in the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that will require major revisions of the FEIR s to disclose new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts identified in the FEIR s; and 3. There is no new information of substantial importance not known at the time the FEIR s were certified that shows that the project will have any new significant effects not discussed in the certified FEIR s or a substantial increase in the severity of the impacts identified in the FEIR s, or that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not feasible, or that are considerably different from those analyzed in the FEIR s, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects. 5