5. Environmental Analysis
|
|
- David Hamilton
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 5.11 The potential for adverse impacts on utilities and service systems was evaluated based on information concerning current service levels and the ability of the service providers to accommodate the increased demand created by the proposed project Environmental Setting Water Supply and Distribution Systems The project site is currently served by the City of Banning Water/Wastewater Utilities. As listed on the City of Banning Water/Wastewater Utilities website, the City of Banning serves a population of about 30,000 people with 10,865 service connections. The City of Banning Water/Wastewater Utilities obtains and treats water from their network of groundwater wells and the State Water Project. The project site itself is partially developed and contains utility service connections on the northwest corner of the site. Water connections would be extended from existing water lines under Sunset Avenue and Westward Avenue for the proposed development at the project site. Wastewater Treatment and Collection Wastewater services are provided by the City of Banning Water/Wastewater Utilities, serving about 30,000 people in Banning. The City of Banning water reclamation plant (WRP) provides wastewater treatment in the City of Banning. This plant is approximately three miles east of the project site and has a design capacity of 3.6 million gallons per day (mgd). The average volume of wastewater treated at the plant is 2.4 mgd. Sewer lines in the region are operated and maintained by the City of Banning Water/Wastewater Utilities. As listed on their website, the City of Banning serves approximately 12,800 businesses and dwellings within the city. The nearest sewer line is under Westward Avenue north of the project site, and the existing buildings on the northwest portion of the site are connected to this sewer line. Storm Drainage Systems The City of Banning Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance of streets and gutters in the city, whereas the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD) is responsible for the maintenance of storm drains in the vicinity of the project site. The project site is located within Zone 5 of the RCFCD, which encompasses over 255 square miles, three cities, and portions of two watersheds. Solid Waste Waste hauling services from properties in Banning are provided by Waste Management, Inc. The area is served by landfills operated by the Riverside County Waste Management Department and Waste Management, Inc. Solid waste from the area is distributed to a number of areas. As listed in the Riverside County Waste Management Department website, for the period between April 2011 and June 2011, solid waste from Banning was disposed of at the Badlands County Landfill, Lamb Canyon County Landfill, and El Sobrante Landfill. Badlands County Landfill as of February 1, 2012, has a remaining capacity of 14,730,025 cubic yards, is permitted to accept 4,000 tons of waste per day, and is estimated to close as early as Lamb Canyon County Landfill as of February 1, 2012, has a remaining capacity of 18,955,000 cubic yards, is permitted to accept 3,000 tons of waste per day, and is estimated to close in El Sobrante Landfill as of February 1, 2012, has a remaining capacity of 145,530,000 cubic yards, is permitted to accept 16,054 tons of waste per day, and is estimated to close in Although some of these landfills will likely be closed by the time Phase III is complete, the policy of the Riverside County Waste Management Department is to continually maintain reserve landfill capacity for a minimum of 15 years. Therefore, there would be other, newer landfills with sufficient San Gorgonio Pass Campus Master Plan Draft EIR Mt. San Jacinto Community College District Page
2 capacity by the time the project is built out. In addition, the waste generated from school operations is far less than 1 percent of the amount of waste that is disposed of at any one landfill and has a minimal impact on waste generation totals compared to the city as a whole. Dry Utilities Utilities would be provided to the proposed facilities by the following service providers, among others: Electricity City of Banning Electric Department Natural Gas Southern California Gas Company Telephone and Internet Service Verizon Communications The City of Banning Electric Department provides electricity services to the City of Banning, including the project area. The City of Banning Electric Department serves a peak demand of 34.5 megawatts of electricity within its service area. Their operation delivers power over a 34.5-kilovolt subtransmission system to five distribution substations. Power is then delivered to customers over distribution lines of 2,400/4,160Y volts and 7,200/12,470Y volts. Plans are in the works to construct an additional two substations and to upgrade existing substation transformer capacity at three substations. The Southern California Gas Company provides natural gas services to the region. The Southern California Gas Company provides natural gas to 20.9 million consumers through 5.8 million meters in more than 500 communities. The company s service territory encompasses approximately 20,000 square miles throughout central and southern California. Verizon Communications provides telephone, internet, and cable television services to the region. Verizon is a global corporation that serves more than 140 million customer connections with telephone, internet, and television services Thresholds of Significance According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project would normally have a significant effect on the environment if the project: U-1 Would exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board. U-2 Would require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. U-3 Would require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. U-4 Would not have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, and new and/or expanded entitlements would be needed. U-5 Would result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that is has inadequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. U-6 Would be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. U-7 Would not comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Page The Planning Center DC&E January 2013
3 The Initial Study, included as Appendix A, substantiates that impacts associated with the following thresholds would be less than significant: Threshold U-7 This impact will not be addressed in the following analysis Environmental Impacts The following impact analysis addresses thresholds of significance for which the Initial Study disclosed potentially significant impacts. The applicable thresholds are identified in brackets after the impact statement. IMPACT : WATER SUPPLY AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS ARE ADEQUATE TO MEET PROJECT REQUIREMENTS. [THRESHOLDS U-2 (PART) AND U-4] Impact Analysis: The proposed project includes extension of utility lines, including water service lines, to the project site. These utility lines would be built in the proposed access roadways that would connect to Sunset Avenue and Westward Avenue. The proposed water lines would likely connect to an existing line under either Sunset Avenue or Westward Avenue, or both. The proposed utility extension lines would be installed during construction of Phase II. These improvements are part of the proposed project, and the associated environmental effects are analyzed throughout this EIR. Full buildout of the proposed project would not require any new or expanded entitlements, and the project would not require the construction of any new infrastructure or support systems beyond the extensions described above. Buildout of the proposed project would result in 250,000 square feet of indoor campus space. Students using that space would consume an estimated 3,750 gallons per day of potable water. In addition, it is estimated that irrigation of landscaping would contribute to a total of 35,251 additional gallons of water per day, for a total of approximately 39,001 gallons per day. Based on communication with the Director of the City of Banning Water /Wastewater Utilities, the available water supplies are anticipated to be sufficient to serve the project. The projection for total water consumption in the City of Banning in 2035 is 14.3 million gallons per day. No significant impacts related to water service would occur as a result of the proposed project and no mitigation measures are necessary. IMPACT : PROJECT-GENERATED WASTEWATER COULD BE ADEQUATELY TREATED BY THE WASTEWATER SERVICE PROVIDER FOR THE PROJECT. [THRESHOLDS U-1, U-2 (PART), AND U-5] Impact Analysis: Most of the proposed project site is currently undeveloped and does not have wastewater services. Development of Phase II of the proposed project would include the installation of new sewer lines, which would connect to existing sewer systems. Wastewater generated by the proposed campus would be typical of community college uses and would not contain substantial levels of pollutants or hazardous substances. The proposed project at full buildout would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board. The project includes the extension of utility lines, including wastewater lines, to the project site. Environmental effects associated with this action are analyzed throughout this EIR. No specific physical changes to the sewerage system would be required beyond extending existing structures to the site. Full buildout of the proposed project would generate approximately 2,813 gallons of wastewater per day. The existing wastewater treatment plant treats 2.4 million gallons of wastewater in a typical day. This volume represents a negligible increase and the local treatment plant is expected to have sufficient capacity to treat the project s wastewater. No significant impacts to wastewater infrastructure or service would occur, and no mitigation measures are necessary. San Gorgonio Pass Campus Master Plan Draft EIR Mt. San Jacinto Community College District Page
4 IMPACT : EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ARE ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. [THRESHOLD U-3] Impact Analysis: Currently, drainage for the project site is via overland (sheet) flow, with the exception of the dry creek stream bed bisecting the site. The existing 2.7-acre San Gorgonio Pass Campus located at the northwest corner of the project site is drained via surface and piped flow until reaching an existing infiltration/detention basin, the dry creek bed, and Pershing Channel. The Pershing Channel, an unimproved natural drainage course, is immediately adjacent to the southern border of the site. Surface runoff enters the project site from Westward Avenue to the north and Sunset Avenue to the west. One 60-inch storm drain along Sunset Avenue intercepts flows northwest of the site and conveys the runoff south to the Pershing Channel. Stormwater runoff from undeveloped areas of the site is conveyed via overland flow into the dry creek bed bisecting the site and Pershing Channel adjacent to the southern border of the project site, as seen in Figure 5.7-3, Project Site Drainage. A detention basin has been constructed in the southern portion of the existing campus development that is designed to contain the 100-year, 3-hour storm. Additional detention basins in the southern portion of the campus are planned as part of the proposed project to detain and treat pollutants from the surface runoff prior to discharge to the Pershing Channel and Smith Creek; additional details are provided in Section The implementation of the project s proposed drainage improvements would ensure that potential impacts from onsite or offsite flooding would be less than significant. IMPACT : EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED FACILITIES WOULD BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE PROJECT-GENERATED SOLID WASTE. [THRESHOLD U-6] Impact Analysis: The proposed project would not directly affect any solid waste systems or facilities. The project involves the proposed construction of a new college campus at a mostly vacant site. Existing modular buildings would be relocated offsite during Phase III of the project. Full buildout of the project would not demolish any existing structures and would therefore not generate demolition debris. Construction of the proposed project would generate a relatively small amount of solid waste construction debris on a temporary basis. Operation of the proposed project would generate solid waste at the site. The State of California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is the state's leading authority on recycling, waste reduction, and product reuse. While CalRecycle does not officially endorse any solid waste generation rate, they have provided a list of cited waste generation rates for colleges that they suggest may be useful in providing a general level of information for planning purposes. In applying the suggested college solid waste generation rate factor of 0.6 pounds of waste per student per day, at project buildout, based on a 365-day school year, the school would generate up to approximately 548 tons of solid waste annually. Furthermore, the proposed project would be compliant with California Education Code sections to 32376, which encourage each college to establish and maintain a paper recycling program in all classrooms, administrative offices, and other areas owned or leased by the college. The rate of waste generation would not significantly increase the amount of regional waste generated and disposed of or otherwise overwhelm or significantly impact solid waste facilities. The proposed project would not trigger the need for new solid waste facilities or services. As listed in the Riverside County Waste Management Department website, for the period between April 2011 and June 2011, solid waste from Banning was disposed of at the Badlands County Landfill, Lamb Canyon County Landfill, and El Sobrante Landfill. Badlands County Landfill has a remaining capacity of 14,730,025 cubic yards, Lamb Canyon County Landfill has a remaining capacity of 18,955,000 cubic yards, and El Sobrante Landfill has a remaining capacity of 145,530,000 cubic yards. Although these landfills will likely be closed by the time Phase III is complete, the ongoing policy of the Riverside County Waste Management Department is to maintain reserve landfill capacity for a minimum of 15 years. Therefore, there should be other, newer landfills by the time the project is built out. In addition, the City of Banning will be more developed by 2030, and thus the campus development will have less impact on waste generation totals compared to the city as a whole. During construction and operation of the proposed project, the District would comply with all city, county, and state solid waste diversion, reduction, and recycling mandates, including compliance with the Countywide Integrated Waste Page The Planning Center DC&E January 2013
5 Management Plan. The District would cooperate, to the extent feasible, with the city s effort to achieve the goals of Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939), the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which requires source reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting programs to reduce tonnage of solid waste going to landfills by 50 percent. The District would make every reasonable effort to reuse and/or recycle the construction debris that would otherwise be taken to a landfill and would also dispose of hazardous wastes, including paint used during construction, only at facilities permitted to receive them, and in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Full buildout of the proposed project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste disposal. The District would arrange for an existing independent contractor such as Waste Management to remove waste from the project site. Neither construction nor operation of the proposed project would generate enough solid waste to overwhelm or otherwise significantly impact landfills or other solid waste systems and facilities in the area. The project would comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. No significant impacts related to solid waste would occur as a result of the proposed project. IMPACT : EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED FACILITIES WOULD BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE PROJECT-GENERATED UTILITY DEMANDS. [NO SPECIFIC THRESHOLD] Impact Analysis: The proposed project would extend existing utility service to the project site from the existing development along Sunset Avenue and Westward Avenue. Extension of these utilities and construction of this road are considered part of the proposed project, and the environmental effects of these actions are considered throughout this EIR. The proposed project would not increase the population of the city as no student housing is proposed, and no increase in the regional demand for utility services would occur as a result of the proposed project. The proposed project would consume relatively small amounts of electricity and gas. The gas and telephone service providers in the area are large regional providers and are capable of providing the level of service necessary for a college campus. The electricity service provider is local, but is planning for continued development in the city and is capable of providing the level of service necessary for a college campus. No significant impacts related to dry utilities would occur as a result of the proposed project Cumulative Impacts Should several projects be constructed which encourage population growth in a region, a cumulative impact to service providers may occur. However, the proposed project would not draw new population to the project area. The project does not include the construction of any new housing, and implementation of the proposed project would not substantially change the population of the area. Cumulative impacts related to water service could occur if new development would require the use of the same existing facilities as the proposed project, increasing the strain on existing facilities. Additionally, the proposed project would extend infrastructure to the project site, including access roadways and utility connections. These infrastructure extensions would lower barriers for future development projects. However, all new projects to be implemented in the area would be required to complete environmental analysis per CEQA and to disclose and analyze any potentially significant impacts on water services. No cumulative impacts would occur Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions California Assembly Bill 1881 required local governments to adopt the State Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or an equivalent. This includes requirements to reduce water use in landscaping. The City of Banning has adopted the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, which establishes recommendations and requirements for the city in order to accommodate future growth with adequate water supplies. The City of Banning has also adopted the 10-Year Electric System Master Plan , which provides recommendations for the city regarding improvements to the electrical distribution system based on existing deficiencies and projected growth. A new San Gorgonio Pass Campus Master Plan Draft EIR Mt. San Jacinto Community College District Page
6 10-Year Electric System Master Plan is prepared every 10 years to help the city accommodate future growth with adequate electricity supplies. The project site is within the jurisdiction of the Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). In the State of California, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and local RWQCBs have assumed the responsibility of implementing US EPA s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program and other programs under the Clean Water Act such as the Impaired Waters Program and the Antidegradation Policy. The primary quality control law in California is the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act (Water Code Sections et seq.). Under Porter-Cologne, the SWRCB issues joint federal NPDES Storm Water permits and state Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) to operators of municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s), industrial facilities, and construction sites to obtain coverage for the storm water discharges from these operations. Assembly Bill (AB) 939 (Chapter 1095, Statutes of 1989), the Integrated Waste Management Act, requires, among other things, every California city and county to divert 50 percent of its waste from landfills by the year In addition, AB 939 requires each county and incorporated cities to prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Element for its jurisdiction, identifying waste characterization; source reduction; recycling; composting; solid waste facility capacity; education and public information; funding; special waste (asbestos, sewage sludge, etc.); and household hazardous waste in addition to a countywide siting element specifying areas for transformation or disposal sites to provide capacity for solid waste generated in the jurisdiction that cannot be reduced or recycled for a 15-year period Level of Significance Before Mitigation The proposed project would not result in any significant or potentially significant impacts related to utilities and service systems Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are necessary Level of Significance After Mitigation The proposed project would not result in any significant or potentially significant impacts related to water supply and delivery systems, wastewater treatment systems, stormwater drainage systems, solid waste or dry utilities. Page The Planning Center DC&E January 2013
3.1.8 Utilities and Service Systems
3.1.8 Utilities and Service Systems This section discusses potential impacts to utilities and service systems, including water, wastewater, and solid waste hauling and disposal, resulting from the implementation
More informationProposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions
Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions The construction and maintenance of infrastructure is necessary to support existing and planned land uses and to achieve Environmental
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 3. SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSAL
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 3. SOLID WASTE AND DISPOSAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Within the City, solid waste management, including collection and disposal services
More informationCLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
1008 STORM DRAINAGE (3/24/05) 1008.01 PURPOSE To minimize the amount of stormwater runoff resulting from development utilizing nonstructural controls where possible, maintain and improve water quality,
More informationV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. Hazardous Materials
E. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS An Environmental Site Assessment Phase I Update was performed on the subject properties by California Environmental Inc. in March 2000 1. This report is included in Appendix E of
More informationDRAFT Public Outreach Document for What s an SSMP?
DRAFT Public Outreach Document for What s an SSMP? This easy to read document is developed and provided to interested parties to assist in educating cities, agencies, their management, elected officials
More information3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN. 3.4.1 Characteristics of Existing Drainages. 3.4.2 Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN
3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN This section describes the existing onsite drainage characteristics and improvements proposed within this Specific Plan. Following this description, drainage plan development standards
More information5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology
I-70 East Final EIS 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology This section discusses floodplain and drainage/hydrology resources and explains why they are important
More informationHow To Get A Stormwater Discharge Permit In A City Of Scottsdale
Environmental Regulations Guide Section 4 Pollution Prevention 4. 0 Pollution Prevention The Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) focuses on source reduction, i.e. on reducing the amount of pollution through
More informationSAN FRANCISCO GROUNDWATER SUPPLY PROJECT
SAN FRANCISCO GROUNDWATER SUPPLY PROJECT Draft Environmental Impact Report Volume 2 of 2 Planning Department State Clearinghouse No. 2009122075 March 2013 City and County of San Francisco San Francisco
More informationFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
9 Supporting Data The purpose of the Element is to ensure the provision of public facilities and services required to meet the future needs of the University, including: Stormwater management, to protect
More informationGOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES The following goal, objective and policy statements have been developed for the use of local policy makers in guiding and directing the decision making process as it relates
More informationChapter 7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES and SERVICES PLAN
Chapter 7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES and SERVICES PLAN Introduction Community facilities play an important role in ensuring a quality standard of living for Township residents, as well as impacting the location
More informationCity of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation Business Development Services
City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation Business Development Services OUR MISSION IS TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES...2-5 EFFORTS TO FACILITATE
More informationNEVADA CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT INQUIRY
NEVADA CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT INQUIRY REASON FOR INVESTIGATION The 2003-2004 Grand Jury investigated the status of wastewater treatment in unincorporated Nevada County. This year, the Grand Jury investigated
More informationCHAPTER 62-624 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS
CHAPTER 62-624 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS 62-624.100 Policy and Purpose. 62-624.200 Definitions. 62-624.300 General Provisions. 62-624.310 General Conditions, Individual Permits. 62-624.400
More informationDraft Photo Documentation Update for Proposition 13 Grant Agreement No. San Diego Region McClellan-Palomar Airport Water Quality Treatment Facility
Draft Photo Documentation Update for Proposition 13 Grant Agreement No. San Diego Region McClellan-Palomar Airport Water Quality Treatment Facility Prepared For: County of San Diego DPW 555 South Overland
More informationChapter 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 AUTHORITY FOR THE ELEMENT 6.3 KEY THEMES AND VISION FOR GENERAL PLAN
Chapter 6 INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT 6.1 INTRODUCTION Public infrastructure is an important support network for the City. Well-designed and maintained infrastructure systems are critical to the community s
More informationGreater Los Angeles County Region
Attachment 6 Greater Los Angeles County Region IRWM Implementation Grant Proposal Monitoring, Assessment, and Attachment 6 consists of the following items: Monitoring, Assessment, and. The purpose of this
More informationDRAFT Guidelines for Manually Diverting Outdoor Wastewater to the Sanitary Sewer
Only RAIN down the Storm Drain... DRAFT Guidelines for Manually Diverting Outdoor Wastewater to the Sanitary Sewer This publication applies to you if: You generate wastewater outdoors, and The wastewater
More informationNorth San Jose Neighborhoods Planning Taskforce
North San Jose Neighborhoods Planning Taskforce Key Topics Water Supply Flooding Related Topics Storm Water Storm Sewer Sanitary Sewer Water Conservation Treatment Plant Water Background Responsible Agencies
More informationUTILITIES: SOLID WASTE
IV.M.3 UTILITIES: SOLID WASTE 1. INTRODUCTION This section describes the handling and disposal of solid waste under current conditions and evaluates changes resulting from implementation of the proposed
More informationSECTION 4.11 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
SECTION 4.11 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section describes federal, state and local regulations applicable to hydrology and water quality. It also describes the regional hydrologic setting, existing
More information4.7 Hydrology/Water Quality
4.0 Environmental Impact Analysis 4.7 Hydrology/Water Quality 4.7 Hydrology/Water Quality This section addresses the flow and quality of surface and ground water within the City. The following hydrology
More informationINFRASTRUCTURE, FLOOD PROTECTION AND REMEDIATION. Infrastructure Flood Protection Remediation Policies
INFRASTRUCTURE, FLOOD PROTECTION AND REMEDIATION Infrastructure Flood Protection Remediation Policies DRAFT POOLBEG PLANNING SCHEME 196 FIGURE 9.1: UTILITIES WAYLEAVES Electricity Cables 8m Wayleave for
More informationChapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations
SWPPP for Park Operations 2 Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations Bordered by Lake Washington & Lake Sammamish, the City of Bellevue has more than 60 miles of streams,
More informationK A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY. 1. Applicant's Name
K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY 1. Applicant's Name Address (Street or Rural Route) (City & State) (Zip) Person to contact Title Phone Fax
More informationFoothill Municipal Water District Recycled Water Project
Foothill Municipal Water District Recycled Water Project Update to Incorporate a Watershed Approach Introduction This paper will describe the Foothill Municipal Water District (FMWD) Recycled Water Project,
More informationAgua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District,
Bibliography Agua Hedionda Creek Flood Plain Information; Department of Army, Los Angeles District, California and Maps. US Army Corps of Engineers July 1973 pg. 24 Aqua Hedionda Lagoon Foundation Framework
More informationSECTION 5.15 ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS
SECTION 5.15 ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS 5.15 ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS This section addresses the potential impacts of the proposed project with regard to electricity and natural gas consumption. The
More informationFlorida Department of Environmental Protection
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Background Mobile vehicle and equipment washing involves washing at a location where vehicles are based (such as a trucking company, warehouse, bus station,
More informationSummary and Description of 2014 Enhancements to New Jersey Model Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipalities
Summary and Description of 2014 Enhancements to New Jersey Model Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipalities This document summarizes and provides explanation for the purpose and intent of major recommended
More informationStorm Drain System Operation and Maintenance
Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program PUBLIC AGENCY ACTIVITIES Performance Standard and Supporting Documents for Storm Drain System Operation and Maintenance December 19, 1996 March
More informationDirector of Utilities. Manager. Regulatory Compliance Supervisor. Distribution Supervisor. Utilities Analyst. Account Clerk. Water
DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART WATER RESOURCES Director of Utilities Secretary Resources Manager Business Services Manager Utilities Engineer Resources Supervisor Distribution Supervisor Utilities Project
More informationColleges & Universities
Colleges & Universities PROFILE The college and university sector 4 includes a wide variety of campuses across the country, from small community colleges to large research universities. Funding sources
More informationINFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R5-2011-XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY
ORDER NO. R5-2011-XXXX INFORMATION SHEET Background Triangle Rock, Inc. (Discharger) submitted a Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) on 23 August 2010. The Discharger is expanding the mining operations at
More informationCOMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMARY
COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMARY Revised: April 2014 Village of Wilmette, Illinois NPDES CSO Permit No. ILM580012 Chapter 1 Introduction This Operational and Maintenance
More informationCity of Bakersfield Public Works Department Sewer System Management Plan December 2014
City of Bakersfield Public Works Department Sewer System Management Plan December 2014 C:\Users\hmayberry\Desktop\SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN 2014.doc 1 Sewer System Management Plan Index: Section 1 Goals
More informationAFFECTED ENVIRONMENT. 3.6 UTILITIES The Presidio's utility systems date from almost every period of the 3.6.1 WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION
184 3.6 UTILITIES The Presidio's utility systems date from almost every period of the Presidio's history of development as a military installation. Consequently, many of its older facilities have required
More informationA. Describe the existing drainage patterns on-site as shown on Map I, including any potential flooding and erosion problems.
19. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A. Describe the existing drainage patterns on-site as shown on Map I, including any potential flooding and erosion problems. The majority of the approximately ±500 acre Property
More information4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. MARCH 2008 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT YUCCA VALLEY RETAIL SPECIFIC PLAN The State defines hazardous material as any material that, because of its quantity, concentration, or
More informationWater Conservation and the State s New Green Building Code for Residential Construction
Water Conservation and the State s New Green Building Code for Residential Construction Silver Sponsors Media Sponsors Certified Sponsors Solano County Water Agency Zone 7 Water Agency Founding Partners
More informationCity and County of San Francisco 2030 Sewer System Master Plan TASK 400 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 405
City and County of San Francisco 2030 Sewer System Master Plan TASK 400 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 405 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR WET WEATHER COLLECTION SYSTEM BACKUPS FINAL DRAFT August 2009 2700 YGNACIO
More informationURBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA
URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA I. Introduction This division contains guidelines for drainage system design and establishes a policy for recognized and established engineering design of storm drain facilities
More informationWhitewater River Region SWMP. APPENDIX F Sanitary Sewer Spill Response Procedure
Whitewater River Region SWMP APPENDIX F Sanitary Sewer Spill Response Procedure June 2009 Sanitary Sewer Spill Response Procedure June 2009 WHITEWATER RIVER WATERSHED MUNICIPAL STORMWATER PERMIT ORDER
More informationNAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM
Planning, Building, and Environmental Services NAPA VALLEY GROWTH NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM Plunging Forward May 15, 2015 1 YOU CAN T CROSS THE SEA MERELY BY STANDING AND STARING AT THE WATER. Rabindranath
More informationCITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet WHAT IS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT? Stormwater management is the method for channeling rainfall through pipes and sewers away from property to
More informationSECTION 5.11 Solid Waste
SECTION 5.11 Solid Waste 5.11 SOLID WASTE This section analyzes the solid waste impacts of the project and recommends mitigation measures to reduce the amount of solid waste going into landfills. Specifically,
More informationNOTICE OF PREPARATION
PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF SUNNYVALE P.O. BOX 3707 SUNNYVALE, CA 94088-3707 NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: Responsible, Trustee, and Other Interested Public Agencies FROM: Sunnyvale Community Development 456
More informationLyons Canyon Ranch Draft Environmental Impact Report
5.17 NATURAL GAS This section addresses the potential impacts of the proposed project with regard to natural gas consumption during construction and operation. The analysis identifies the utility that
More informationCity of Inglewood Well No. 2 Rehabilitation. City of Inglewood Thomas Lee
City of Inglewood Well No. 2 Rehabilitation City of Inglewood Thomas Lee Project Location (Photos and location maps of the project) Project Description The City of Inglewood (City)receives its annual potable
More informationPermeable Pavers. calstone.com. Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements (PICP s)
Permeable Pavers Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements (PICP s) CBC Title 24/ADA Compliant LEED Functional Optimum balance of surface infiltration and joint interlock Available in a 6 x 9 Quarry Stone
More information* 765 million tons of recoverable reserves as of 1970; W.E. Edmonds, Pennsylvania Geologic Survey
IV. PROPOSED PLAN FOR AMD ABATEMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Although the major natural resource in the Wyoming Valley is anthracite coal*, its importance to the present and future economy of the area is limited
More informationPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE 2100 Sunset Drive Pacific Grove, CA 93950 Telephone: (831)648-5722 / Facsimile: (831)375-0627
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE 2100 Sunset Drive Pacific Grove, CA 93950 Telephone: (831)648-5722 / Facsimile: (831)375-0627 I. Questions & responses 1 through 3 received prior to the Pre-SOQ
More informationChapter 4.0 - Impacts of the Proposed Project
Chapter 4.0 - Impacts of the Proposed Project 4.0 Impacts of the Proposed Project This section presents the baseline conditions and the analysis of the potential for the proposed Ridgecrest Sanitary Landfill
More informationMARYLAND AVENUE BACKUPS DURING AUGUST 31, 2014 STORM EVENT COMMUNITY OUTREACH
MARYLAND AVENUE BACKUPS DURING AUGUST 31, 2014 STORM EVENT COMMUNITY OUTREACH MARYLAND AVENUE BACKUPS COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETING AGENDA Introductions History of PWSA Actions August 31 Storm Impacts Short
More informationTEXAS: SAN ANTONIO San Antonio Protects Edwards Aquifer
TEXAS: SAN ANTONIO San Antonio Protects Edwards Aquifer Background San Antonio, the seventh largest city in the United States, covers approximately 515 square miles of Bexar County in south central Texas.
More informationBaltimore City Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) July 2, 2012
Baltimore City Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) July 2, 2012 1. Overview of the Local Team s process The WIP Team is compiled of three teams with varying levels of contribution: Core Team,
More informationSave Our Heritage Organisation v. San Diego Unified Port District
Save Our Heritage Organisation v. San Diego Unified Port District 1 San Diego County Regional Airport Authority created by legislation in 2003 Operates San Diego International Airport Acts as the Airport
More informationAquatera 2015/16 Business Plan Highlights
Who We Are Aquatera 2015/16 Business Plan Highlights Aquatera is a full-service utility corporation the provider of choice for governments, businesses, and communities. Our business is to provide high-quality
More informationFloodplain Development Land Use Review
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 490 333 Broadalbin Street SW Albany, OR 97321 Phone 541-917-7550 Fax 541-791-0150 www.cityofalbany.net Floodplain Development Land Use Review
More informationSan Francisco Water Powe Sewer Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
San Francisco Water Powe Sewer Services of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission 525 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 T 415.554.3155 F 415.554.3161 TTY 415.554.3488 January
More informationChapter 4. Watershed Management. Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 4 Watershed Management Sarasota County Comprehensive Plan Sarasota County Planning & Development Services 1660 Ringling Boulevard 1 st Floor Sarasota County, FL 34236 Contact Telephone: 941-861-5140
More informationMicromanagement of Stormwater in a Combined Sewer Community for Wet Weather Control The Skokie Experience
Micromanagement of Stormwater in a Combined Sewer Community for Wet Weather Control The Skokie Experience Robert W. Carr 1 * and Stuart G. Walesh 2 1 Water Resources Modeling, LLC, 4144 S. Lipton Ave,
More informationImproper storage of fuel on construction sites will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur as a result of leaks or spills.
WQ-10 Best Management Practice (BMP) Water Quality Protection Guideline Secondary Containment Design Standards Fuel Storage on Construction Sites According to the EPA, the majority of water pollution in
More informationThe Clean Water Project What Is The Stormwater Impact?
The Clean Water Project What Is The Stormwater Impact? Presentation To: Seminar On Water Issues Bob Weimar, PE, BCEE Chief of Program Management The Metropolitan District Sewage Overflows Have Become More
More informationAmeren Callaway Energy Center-Water Treatment Plant Sedimentation Basins #5 , MO-0098001, Construction Permit No. CP0001707, Callaway County
Ms. Gail Geary Ameren Missouri 1901 Chouteau Ave. PO Box 66149, MC 602 St. Louis, MO 63166-6149 RE: Ameren Callaway Energy Center-Water Treatment Plant Sedimentation Basins #5 , MO-0098001, Construction,
More informationTown of Yorktown Comprehensive Plan 8. INFRASTRUCTURE
Town of Yorktown Comprehensive Plan 8. INFRASTRUCTURE 8. Infrastructure 8.1 VISION STATEMENT Infrastructure is a basic building block of the community essential for the health, safety, and welfare of residents.
More informationCHAPTER 15 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
CHAPTER 15 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS 15.1 INTRODUCTION In accordance with Section 402 (p) of the Clean Water Act, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
More informationLow Impact Development Checklist
New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual February 2004 A P P E N D I X A Low Impact Development Checklist A checklist for identifying nonstructural stormwater management strategies incorporated
More informationIndoor Water Conservation and I&I Reduction (EIR Alternatives 1 and 2)
SECTION 2 Description of Master Plan Alternatives The six alternatives that constitute the building blocks of the IRWP Master Plan are as follows: Indoor Water Conservation (EIR Alternative 1) I&I Reduction
More informationMaking San Francisco A Water Sensitive City Urban Watershed Management Program October 25, 2011
Making San Francisco A Water Sensitive City Urban Watershed Management Program October 25, 2011 Outline San Francisco Context Drivers of Change Emerging Paradigm LID Program Goals Mechanisms for Change
More informationEngineering. 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 Major Service Actual Budget Projected Request Executive Adopted
Engineering Agency Number: 53 Budget Function: Public Works and Transportation The Engineering Division is responsible for the design, supervision and inspection of all street, highway, sidewalk and bike
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE ADAPTING TO RISING TIDES EXISTING CONDITIONS AND STRESSORS REPORT
INTRODUCTION TO THE ADAPTING TO RISING TIDES EXISTING CONDITIONS AND STRESSORS REPORT The Adapting to Rising Tides (ART) project evaluated the current condition of shoreline and community assets, and the
More informationSILICON VALLEY CLEAN WATER. May 2015
SILICON VALLEY CLEAN WATER May 2015 Slug Discharge Control and Spill Containment Guidelines This document was revised and used with the permission of the Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Industrial
More informationUTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Comprehensive Plan Update Draft Existing Conditions Report - City of Palo Alto - August 29, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 13.... 13-1 13.1 WATER SUPPLY AND CONSERVATION...13-1 13.1.1 Environmental Setting...
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES
Proponent s Environmental Assessment Section 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY... 4.8-1 4.8.1 Introduction... 4.8-2 4.8.2 Methodology... 4.8-2 4.8.3 Existing
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK. 2.1 State Regulations. 2.1.1 California Integrated Waste Management Act
IV.L.3 Solid Waste 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section describes the generation and management of solid waste on the Loyola Marymount University campus and evaluates the changes resulting from implementation
More informationSan Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant Proposal Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits
Attachment 9 San Diego Integrated Regional Water Management Economic Analysis Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits Attachment 9 consists of the following items: Flood Damage Reduction Costs and Benefits.
More informationAppendix F6 Option Characterization Reuse
Appendix F6 Option Characterization Reuse Appendix F6 Option Characterization Reuse 1.0 Introduction Many municipal and industrial entities that receive Colorado River water have implemented wastewater
More informationSolid Waste Treatment Facility Solid Waste Permit Application
Part One: Fees A check or money order for the appropriate fees must be submitted with the permit application. If the required fees are not included, the permit application will be returned to the applicant.
More informationKansas City s Overflow Control Program
Kansas City s Overflow Control Program Kansas City Water Services Water Wastewater Stormwater 2 Water Services Department 1000 Positions 835 Employees 3 Utilities FY 13/14 Budget = $307 million Water Wastewater
More informationGENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
DESCRIPTIONS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS Appendix C, page 2 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS State Transportation Bonds --- 1968 An amount of $640,000,000 was authorized to improve the public transportation system.
More information2006 Standard Application Processing Time. 10 months. 14 months
Air and Radiation Management Administration General Permit to Construct - without expanded public review Air Quality Permit to Construct - with expanded public review but limited public interest 11 months
More information12/3/2015 MUNICIPAL STORMWATER RESPONSIBILITIES YOU NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS STORMWATER? WHY?
MUNICIPAL STORMWATER RESPONSIBILITIES YOU NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS STORMWATER? Stormwater occurs when precipitation from rain or snowmelt flows over the ground WHY? 1 DEP/EPA AUDITING It is happening! Here
More informationUTILITIES ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. INTRODUCTION 3 1. Growth Management Act Requirements 3 2. Purpose of Utilities Element 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 3 1. Growth Management Act Requirements 3 2. Purpose of Utilities Element 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CAPACITY 4 1. Water Supply 4 a. Existing conditions 4 b. Capacity
More informationFLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS
IV. (340 points) Flood Protection Benefits A. Existing and potential urban development in the floodplain (50) 1. Describe the existing and potential urban development at the site and the nature of the
More informationBest Management Practices (BMPs) Ideas for School Districts. Presented by: Donald Lussier
Best Management Practices (BMPs) Ideas for School Districts Presented by: Donald Lussier What Will We Learn? What are BMPs? Why we need them? What to consider when selecting them? What should your BMP
More informationInterlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010
Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010 Background What are permeable interlocking concrete pavements (PICP)?
More informationLos Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report 3.5 ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY.
3.5 ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY As a result of the analysis undertaken in the Initial Study 1 for the Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan, the LACCD determined that the proposed
More informationELIMINATE STORM WATER FROM ENTERING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS
(408) 761 5882 http://www.sewerlock.net ELIMINATE STORM WATER FROM ENTERING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS 1. `The United States and various State Environmental Protection Agency regulations require elimination
More informationDewatering - Time and Cost Relief by way of Trenchless Construction
North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT) NASTT s 2015 No-Dig Show Denver, Colorado March 15-19, 2015 TA-T3-04 Dewatering - Time and Cost Relief by way of Trenchless Construction Jenn Stillman,
More informationFINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION 1000 FRENCH STREET SITE Wilmington, Delaware DE 1115 June 1999 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of Air and Waste Management Site Investigation
More informationSan Diego Citizen s Forum. USIBWC San Diego Field Office
San Diego Office Update San Diego Citizen s Forum Steve Smullen, Area Operations Manager USIBWC San Diego Field Office August 25, 2011 SAN DIEGO OFFICE ACTIVITIES Flood Control Tijuana River Flood Control
More informationSacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Building and Site Rehabilitation Project March, 2015
Addendum 1: Changes to the Draft IS/MND Text and Figures Introduction This summary presents minor corrections and revisions made to the Draft IS/MND initiated by the public, staff and/or consultants based
More informationState of Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch
State of Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Industrial Antidegradation Analysis
More informationIC24. DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER GENERATED BY MOBILE BUSINESSES AND OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES
IC24. DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER GENERATED BY MOBILE BUSINESSES AND OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) A BMP is a technique, measure, or structural control that is used for a given set of conditions
More informationEnvironmental Guidelines for Preparation of an Environmental Management Plan
2013 Environmental Guidelines for Preparation of an Environmental Management Plan Environmental Management Division Environmental Protection Agency 3/13/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF
More informationCITY CLERK MEMORANDUM 15-70
CITY CLERK MEMORANDUM 15-70 DATE: November 12,2015 TQ: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Bruce Applegate, Acting City Clerk SUBJECT: ADDITIONS TO THE NOVEMBER 16, 2015 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
More informationComparison of Greenhouse Gas Efficiency Metrics for Projects, Specific Plans, General Plans, and Climate Action Plans
Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Efficiency Metrics for Projects, Specific Plans, General Plans, and Climate Action Plans Extended Abstract # 15 Whitney R. Leeman, J. Matthew Gerken, and Jeffrey A. Henderson
More information