General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]
|
|
|
- Reynold Harper
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title] Purpose These rules set forth the conditions under which a person may, without an individual removal-fill permit from the Department, place or remove material in waters of this state for the purpose of promoting waterway-floodplain connectivity for beneficial outcomes including elevated water tables, regularly flooded stream-adjacent surfaces, sediment deposition and soils improvement, increased channel complexity, riparian vegetation recovery and slow-water aquatic habitat development. Definitions (1) Beaver dam analogue means a structure within a waterway constructed primarily from organic material, and which may be supplemented by stream bed and bank materials, serving to mimic the hydrological, geomorphological, and ecological functions of natural beaver dams or assist beavers with the construction of natural beaver dams. (2) Incised or eroded waterway means a waterway that has been scoured by erosion to the extent that the channel bed elevation has lowered relative to its historic floodplain and the waterway has reduced ecological functionality because it has lost connectivity with the historic floodplain, as characterized by water table or water surface elevation lowering, the loss of natural wetland, riparian and meadow conditions in the adjacent surfaces, reduction in over-bank flood frequency or sediment deposition, the loss of diversity of fish and other animal species or the presence of dry land species that have encroached from adjacent uplands. (3) Malheur Lake Drainage Basin means the area included within Hydrologic Unit Codes , , , , , , , and Comment [KDJ1]: HB 3217 definition with a few friendly amendments as noted. Deleted: the absence of Deleted: ing Comment [KDJ2]: This is the same watershed proposed in HB 3217, only defined by HUC codes which is DSL s standard watershed nomenclature. (4) Native migratory fish is defined in ORS (5) Restoration check dam means a low-profile structure within a waterway and may extend to the historic floodplain, constructed from organic and or non-manufactured inorganic material (e.g., dirt, rock, gravel) in a manner designed to raise the water table and water surface elevations to the level of the historic floodplain by slowing, but not preventing water flow to promote floodplain connectivity. 1
2 Eligibility Requirements (1) Purpose. The project must be for the purpose defined in. (2) Non-tidal waters. The project must be located in non-tidal waters only. (3) Wetlands. The project involves no permanent loss of wetlands located above the ordinary high water elevation of any waterway proposed for treatment. (4) For beaver dam analogues: (a) Project sites are limited to incised or eroded waterways with a gradient less than 4%, a bankfull width less than 25 feet and a valley width of greater than 100 feet. The Department may allow alternative gradients or widths upon demonstration of current or historic beaver activity in the project area. (b) Project sites are limited to waterways historically inhabited by beaver but beaver are not currently successfully constructing or maintaining dams, or where reinforcement of existing beaver dams is needed. (5) For restoration check dams: (a) Project sites are limited to incised or eroded waterways within the Malheur Lake Drainage Basin. (b) Project sites are limited to waterways with a gradient less than 4%, a bankfull width less than 10 feet and a valley width of greater than 100 feet. (c) Project sites are limited to waterways not currently known to be inhabited by dambuilding beaver, or where there is insufficient habitat to support dam-building beaver. Comment [KDJ3]: Smaller bankfull width specified here to ensure lower stream power and smaller material sizes. (d) Project sites are limited to waterways that: (A) Do not currently contain, and did not historically contain, native migratory fish; or, (B) Do not currently contain, but did historically contain, native migratory fish where habitat is now the limiting factor, as determined by the OR Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2
3 General Permit-Specific Application Requirements In addition to the application requirements described in OAR , the applicant must provide the following information in the application: (1) Eligibility criteria met. The application must include maps, data and other information necessary to demonstrate that the proposed project meets the eligibility requirements specified in. (2) Drawings. The application must include scaled plan view, cross-section and longitudinal drawings illustrating the proposed dimensions of the structures relative to ordinary high water elevation and historic floodplain elevations. Drawings must show expected extent and depths of inundation zone. Plan view drawings must identify proposed spacing between structures and any infrastructure or other property improvements within the proposed area of effect. (3) Wetlands. For any wetlands above the ordinary high water line anticipated to be effected by the activity, describe the nature and expected duration of the effect, the estimated wetland area and the basis for the estimate (e.g., extent of hydrophytic vegetation, National Wetlands Inventory mapping, hydric soils mapping). The Department may elevate an application to individual permit status if, in the Department s judgement, permanent loss or other adverse effect to wetlands above the ordinary high water line is likely to occur. (4) Vegetation management plan. Application must include riparian planting and/or vegetation management plan considering the expected reach of water, likelihood of volunteer native plant recruitment, potential for spread of invasive species and management of potentially conflicting land uses in adjacent area (e.g., ungulate grazing). (5) Sediment control plan. If placement of inorganic material is proposed to occur in flowing waters, the application must include a description of best management practices to be used to minimize suspension of sediment in the waterway. (6) Fish exclusion plan. If fish are expected to be present in the waterway during construction, the application must include a description of methods to be used to exclude fish from the work area during construction. (7) ODFW determinations. For proposed restoration check dams, the application must include documentation from ODFW stating the current and historic presence of native migratory fish and whether waterway habitat is the limiting factor for native migratory fish presence now. 3
4 Authorized Activities (1) Beaver Dam Analogues. Up to 20 structures per authorization and not more than two structures per waterway meander wavelength or 14 channel widths. The two structures limitation may be waived by the Department upon demonstration that waterway conditions warrant the additional placements without causing significant adverse effects to water resources. (2) Restoration Check Dams. Up to 20 structures per authorization and not more than two structures per waterway meander wavelength or 14 channel widths. The two structures limitation may be waived by the Department upon demonstration that waterway conditions warrant the additional placements without causing significant adverse effects to water resources. General Permit-Specific Conditions (1) General Conditions Apply. All requirements, procedures and conditions set forth in OAR (General Conditions) apply to this General Permit. (2) Placement of inorganic material is subject to the following conditions: (a) Material is limited to the minimum quantity necessary to prevent under-scour of structure and reduce pore flow sufficient to ensure adequate over-topping flow and side flow to facilitate fish passage particularly during low-flow periods. Comment [KDJ4]: The following condition is already a requirement, by rule, for all General Permits: Hazards to Recreation, Navigation or Fishing. The activity must be timed not to interfere with or create a hazard to recreational or commercial navigation or fishing.] (b) Material is limited to the minimum quantity necessary to achieve the purpose pursuant to. (3) Natural Materials. Material used must be similar to materials currently or historically found naturally in the project area, except as otherwise allowed in (8)(g). (4) No cabling, wire, mortar or other materials that serve to affix the structure to bed, banks or upland is allowed. (5) No water withdrawals for beneficial use is allowed. (6) Native woody vegetation removal must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Where necessary, knock-down of woody vegetation to allow re-sprouting is preferred to removal. Any removed woody vegetation and any ground alteration by heavy equipment must be restored in equivalent numbers and contours at construction completion. 4
5 (7) No operation of heavy equipment in water is allowed. (8) For beaver dam analogues: (a) Structures must be no more than one-foot thick at the top as measured parallel to stream flow. (b) Structures must provide for a water surface differential of no more than one-foot at low flows, or otherwise provide clear path for fish passage through or around the structure via side channels during low flows. (c) Weaves must be sufficiently loose to provide porosity sufficient maintain fish passage through the structure and maintain fish rearing capacity in the impoundment area upstream of the structure. (d) To the extent practicable, river-run gravels or cobbles must be used where rock is warranted. (e) To extent practicable, posts must driven to a depth at least 1.5 times below the expected scour depth of the waterway. (f) Post driving using hydraulic methods must be conducted during low flow conditions and otherwise minimize driving within the wetted channel. (g) Wooden posts must be untreated and may utilize species not naturally found in the waterway reach. (9) For restoration check dams: (a) Only erosion-resistant rock from local upland sources may be used. Rock size is limited to the maximum necessary to prevent mobilization during high flow periods. Rock must be placed, not dumped, from above the bank line. (b) Structures must be designed to allow over-topping at? flows. Comment [KDJ5]: For RAC discussion. (c) Structures must provide for a water surface differential of no more than one foot at low flows, or otherwise provide clear path for fish passage around the structure via side channels during low flows. (d) Structures must incorporate natural materials to encourage vegetation. 5
6 (e) Structures must ensure sufficient fine material in the backwater area to prevent sub out. Monitoring and Reporting (1) Post-Project Reporting. Upon completion of the project, the project must be reported to the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board at by completing the Oregon Watershed Restoration Inventory (OWRI) form. The DSL authorization number must be included on the reporting form. (2) Annual Monitoring and Reporting. Potential elements [subject to further discussion with RAC]: Pre-construction photos Annual high flow and low flow photographs from fixed photo-monitoring points Description of channel response aggradation of stream bed? Incised channel widening? Evidence increased floodplain connection? Other geomorphic changes? Hydrologic response - Impoundment max size and depth; change in downstream flow quantity/duration? Temperature monitoring at downstream end? Vegetation response in riparian zone and floodplain as compared to preconstruction condition Other habitat improvements/wildlife use observed? Any unexpected adverse changes to waterway, floodplain? Comment [KDJ6]: Requirements must be manageable by a range of permittees yet be useful for permit effectiveness monitoring. Term (1) Term. Notwithstanding the provisions of OAR , this GP will be reviewed within 10 years of the effective date of this rule for compliance with the review standards set forth in ORS through and the Department must find that the GP will not result in long-term harm to water resources of this state. The Department shall rely upon annual reports submitted pursuant to OAR and its own investigations for this 10-year review. (2) Amend or Rescind. The Department will amend or rescind this GP upon a determination that the activities conducted under the GP have resulted in or would result in unacceptable individual or cumulative environmental effects or long-term harm to the water resources of this state. The Department may rescind and require corrective action for any authorization under this General Permit upon a finding of unacceptable harm to water resources of this state. 6
Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting
Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting Agenda Public Outreach, Funding, Monitoring EA/BA/Permit Updates Deconstruction Plans Fish Passage & Salvage Plan Hydraulic Modeling Next Steps Public Outreach,
1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria
1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria 1.7.1 Introduction These guidelines set out standards for evaluating and processing proposed modifications of the 100- year floodplain with the following objectives:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold
CHAPTER 11 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Active Channel The channel that contains the discharge Leopold where channel maintenance is most effective, sediment are actively transported and deposited, and that are capable
Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration
Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples Pierre Y. Julien Wuhan 2005 Objectives Part I - Stream restoration and rehabilitation: 1. Present and discuss important concepts, laws, criteria
Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design
Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design 2015 Symposium on Restoration in a Contaminated Environment: Lessons Learned and Challenges in Moving Forward Part II April 2015 Karin Boyd Applied Geomorphology,
Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc. Topics covered: Definition of riparian and floodplain restoration Floodplain attributes as a basis for developing criteria for restoration designs
Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration
Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration Prepared by: New Jersey Section American Water Resources Association Stream Restoration Committee FHA Subcommittee
CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL
CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL Book 2 (SW) SW9 June 2015 SW9.01 Purpose This Chapter provides information for the design of open channels for the conveyance of stormwater in the City of Fort Wayne.
Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County
Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project City of Fremont, Alameda County Agenda Background Why are proposed improvements necessary? Proposed project components Challenges Construction schedule/phasing
MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1
MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives o Describe functions lost at impact site o Describe functions to be gained at mitigation site o Describe overall watershed
3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;
QIN Shoreline Master Program Project Summary The Shoreline Master Program (SMP) development process for the Quinault Indian Nation (QIN) includes the completion of inventory and analysis report with corresponding
Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location
Prattsville Berm Removal Project 1.0 Project Location The project site is located between the New York State Route 23 Bridge over the Schoharie Creek and the Schoharie Reservoir. The restoration plan encompassed
Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013
Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction 2013-2015 Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013 1. Design alternatives for large capital flood projects (basinlevel water retention and Interstate
BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are
Chapter 10 Bridges Chapter 10 Bridges Bridg Bridges -- usually the best, but most expensive drainage crossing structure. Protect bridges against scour. BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are the
The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:
Following the recent flooding events for Front Range communities in Colorado, property owners, communities, and the National Flood Insurance Program are being presented with some new challenges in the
Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum
Final Report Dixie Creek Restoration Project Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum Plumas Corporation January 2009 1 Background FR-CRM staff presented this project to the Dixie Valley Landowners Association
Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization
Introduction A visual examination of Doolittle Creek in a highly developed suburban county in Georgia yielded telltale signs of a creek whose original streambed had been altered. Examination of official
Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY 1710. The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.
Earth Science GEOGRAPHY 1710 River Systems and Landforms DAVID R. SALLEE Robert W. Christopherson Charlie Thomsen Chapter 14 Introduction Rivers and streams are dynamic systems that continually adjust
Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS
Chapter 3 3.01 General Provisions 3.01.1 Introduction 3.01.2 Application and Interpretation of Chapter 3.01.3 Unbuildable Lots 3.01.4 Other Permits 3.01.5 Prohibited Activities 3.02 Service Provider Letter
Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)
Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins) DRAINAGE CONTROL TECHNIQUE Low Gradient Velocity Control Short-Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1] [1]
Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC
Addendum D Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC Moody Wash ACEC is hereby nominated by Citizens for Dixie s Future to: BLM St. George Field Office 345 East Riverside Drive St. George, UT 84790 Moody Wash is a
Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile
Chapter 3 CULVERTS Description A culvert is a closed conduit used to convey water from one area to another, usually from one side of a road to the other side. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality
Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Emergency Watershed Protection Program Floodplain Easements Rhode Island Natural Resources Conservation Service Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4
CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES
GOVERNMENT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND LABOUR CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DIVISION Water Investigations
Appendix H Dredging and Stream Channel Restoration
Appendix H Dredging and Stream Channel Restoration Mankind s intrusion into the natural environment in West Virginia began in earnest following the Civil War when extractive industries and settlement all
Coldwater Heritage Partnership Implementation Grant Final Report Morrison Run Watershed Restoration Project Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Summary The goal of the Morrison Run Watershed Restoration
Neversink River East Branch
Neversink River East Branch Management Unit 10 Summary of Post-Flood Recommendations Intervention Level Full restoration of the stream reach including the eroding bank site between Station 38380 and Station
Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes. Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute
Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute Assessing Rivers for Restoration
3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN. 3.4.1 Characteristics of Existing Drainages. 3.4.2 Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN
3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN This section describes the existing onsite drainage characteristics and improvements proposed within this Specific Plan. Following this description, drainage plan development standards
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SECTION 404 REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT CHANNEL AND BANK PROTECTION STRUCTURES ON THE SOUTH PLATTE RIVER
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SECTION 404 REGIONAL GENERAL PERMIT CHANNEL AND BANK PROTECTION STRUCTURES ON THE SOUTH PLATTE RIVER Permit Expires: December 31, 2017 Regional General Permit No. 87-01 Issuing Office:
Floodplain Development Land Use Review
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 490 333 Broadalbin Street SW Albany, OR 97321 Phone 541-917-7550 Fax 541-791-0150 www.cityofalbany.net Floodplain Development Land Use Review
Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.
Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013 Rationale Underground infrastructure may be at risk from valley, streambank
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE
WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE May 24, 2005 Table of Contents Introduction...3 Definitions...3 Types of Wetland Restorations...4 Re-Contouring...4 Engineered...4 Water
Sand and Silt Removal from Salmonid Streams
Sand and Silt Removal from Salmonid Streams Stream bank erosion Poor land use practices Sources of Sand and Silt Impacts of Sand and Silt Interstitial spaces infilled Little or no flow through the streambed
Guideline: Works that interfere with water in a watercourse watercourse diversions. September 2014
Guideline: Works that interfere with water in a watercourse watercourse diversions September 2014 This publication has been compiled by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines. State of Queensland,
How To Check For Scour At A Bridge
Case Studies Bridge Scour Inspection and Repair Edward P. Foltyn, P.E. Senior Hydraulic Engineer ODOT Bridge Unit 2013 PNW Bridge Inspectors Conference April 2013 REFERENCES Stream Stability at Highway
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit
PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit 30-Day Notice Issue Date: June 20, 2016 Expiration Date: July 20, 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers No: NWP-2010-535 Oregon Department of State Lands No: 58311-RF Interested
Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America
Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America What Defines Passive Restoration? Process-based, nature-driven Minimal equipment
Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework
Oregon Climate Change Adaptation Framework Oregon Environmental Quality Commission Climate Change Adaptation Framework Presentation at a glance: Purposes of the framework Participating agencies Climate
Various options are discussed below.these low cost, low impact interventions can also be applied as general erosion control methods.
Week 10 River Hydraulics Rehabilitating Urban Waterways (From http://hubpages.com/hub/river-bank-erosion-control-methods) See also the resources placed on Moodle. Water channels should be viewed as a resource
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING DESIGN LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RIVER RESTORATION. www.sindlar.eu
Geomorphological processes of watercourse development, system of typology and application of the results in practice Part 01 Analysis of geomorphological processes in watercourses Part 02 Applications
Outlet stabilization structure
Overview of Sedimentation and Erosion Control Practices Practice no. 6.41 Outlet stabilization structure Erosion at the outlet of channels, culverts, and other structures is common, and can cause structural
Restoring and Managing Riparian Areas
Restoring and Managing Riparian Areas Presentation to the Forest Watershed Management Symposium 12 March 2015 Susanville, CA Themes from the Science Synthesis for the Sierra Nevadasouthern Cascade Range
Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings
Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide River crossings Second edition, November 2010 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Impacts of crossings 5 2.1 Construction phase impacts 5 2.2 Barrier to
Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan
Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan Throughout the Plan 1. There is a fundamental need for the revised plan to address how
Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:
CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN Adopted 9/23/98 PART 1: GOALS. POLICY. COVERAGE. A. Goals The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are: 1. Preservation and protection
5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES
5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES Flood damage reduction consists of two basic techniques structural and non-structural. Structural methods modify the flood and take the flood away from people
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project I. Description of the Project and its Relationship to Other Projects in the Proposal The Lower
The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:
The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary: The Teton Creek Restoration Project area extends for approximately one mile upstream from the Cemetery Road Bridge and includes the Aspen Pointe, The Aspens
GENERAL PERMIT BWEW-GP-11 MAINTENANCE, TESTING, REPAIR, REHABILITATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF WATER OBSTRUCTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATERWAYS ENGINEERING AND WETLANDS GENERAL PERMIT BWEW-GP-11 MAINTENANCE, TESTING, REPAIR, REHABILITATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF
3. Design Procedures. Design Procedures. Introduction
Design Procedures 3. Design Procedures Introduction This chapter presents a procedure for the design of natural channels. The chapter primarily focuses on those physical properties of the channel required
Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008
Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008 In partnership with Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP), American Wildlands, and Wildlife Forever, the Madison
How To Plan A Buffer Zone
Backyard Buffers Protecting Habitat and Water Quality What is a buffer? A buffer (also called a riparian buffer area or zone) is the strip of natural vegetation along the bank of a stream, lake or other
King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction
King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction Introduction Eminent domain refers to the power possessed by the state over all property within the
Regulatory Features of All Coastal and Inland Ecological Restoration Limited Projects
Eligibility Checklist This Ecological Restoration Limited Project Eligibility Checklist guides the applicant in determining if their project is eligible to file as an Inland or Coastal Ecological Restoration
Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant [email protected]. The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk
Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration Dr Jenny Mant [email protected] The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk 3 Main Catchment Elements Hydrology Energy associated with the flow of water affects
Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey
Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey Rutgers Cooperative Extension Water Resources Program Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E. Email: [email protected]
RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS
RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS by Hany Elwany, Ph.D. Scripps Institution of Oceanography Headwaters to Oceans Conference 25 October 2003 CE Ref #03-22 San Diego County Lagoons
The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA
The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA April 17, 2013 Goal To develop a basic understanding of PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and US Army Corps of Engineers
Carlton Fields Memorandum
Carlton Fields Memorandum TO: FROM: RE: DAN WEEDE FRED RUSHING RIPARIAN BUFFER DATE: JULY 26, 2013 BACKGROUND Both the state of Georgia and the city of Atlanta 1 have certain guidelines that must be followed
What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed
What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed presented by Ceil Strauss, State Floodplain Manager DNR Ecological & Water Resources 1 EWR Roles In Floodplains Regulatory:
Plumas Watershed Forum. Review of Ongoing Projects. Updated 10/1/008
Plumas Watershed Forum Review of Ongoing Projects Updated 10/1/008 Hosselkus II Restoration Project Approved Funding: $80,000 (A funds) Expended By 10/1/08: $79,603 This pond-and-plug creek restoration
HCP Team Meeting. November 18, 2015. icfi.com
HCP Team Meeting November 18, 2015 icfi.com 1 Welcome and Introductions Where are we in the HCP process Hydrology modeling update Native fish survey Fish translocation Finalize covered activities Next
EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA
EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA René Leclerc Geomorphologist Robert C. MacArthur, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Headwaters
Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013
NCDA&CS - North Carolina Forest Service Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013 For the N.C. Division of Water Quality
Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank
Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank Black Creek Pioneer Village, South Theatre 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Habitat Restoration and Environmental Monitoring Projects Section Restoration
Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner
Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner Channel Naturalization: Planning and Implementation in Peel Region TRIECA March 25 & 26, 2015 Peel Region Channel Remediation Strategy An Urban Context
A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast
International Erosion Control Association Annual Conference 2009, Reno, Nevada Case Study Technical Presentation A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast Justin S. Rogers, P.E.,
Section 401 Water Quality Certification
Section 401 Water Quality Certification Department of Health Environmental Management Division Clean Water Branch Voice: (808) 586-4309 Fax: (808) 586-4352 http://www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental/water/cleanwater/index.html
River Wensum Restoration Strategy Swanton Morley Restoration Scheme Reach 14a
River Wensum Restoration Strategy Swanton Morley Restoration Scheme Reach 14a At a glance River restoration benefits: Improved planform, channel cross-section, flow variation and sediment process. Improved
STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208
STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208 RANGELAND HEALTH STANDARDS - ASSESSMENT SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208 STANDARD 1 - UPLAND WATERSHED This standard is being met on the allotment.
COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N
COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N Submitted by the National Park Service Point Reyes National Seashore Point Reyes Station, California, 94956 Project Description: Muddy
Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting down businesses, harming the environment
Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Value to Individuals and Communities Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting
How To Write A Watercourse Crossing
Code of Practice for Watercourse Crossings Made under the Water Act and the Water (Ministerial) Regulation Consolidated to include amendments in force as of June 24, 2013 Office Consolidation Published
March 2008. Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District. 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA 92618. Contact: Natalie Likens (949) 453-5633
ADDENDUM TO THE MICHELSON WATER RECLAMATION PLANT PHASE 2 & 3 CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT FEBRUARY 2006 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND THE SAN JOAQUIN FRESHWATER MARSH ENHANCEMENT PLAN REVISED SEPTEMBER
Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MEDFORD DISTRICT OFFICE GRANTS PASS RESOURCE AREA 2164 NE SPALDING AVENUE GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA) Office: Grants
Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) 6.50.1 6.51.1. Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary) 6.52.1
6 Index inlet protection excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) 6.50.1 HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary) sod drop inlet protection ROCK DOUGHNUT
ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND
ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND The Rose Creek Watershed (RCW) consists of three planning
DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT
DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT By: Conor C. Shea Stream Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service CBFO-S07-01 Prepared in
URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA
URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA I. Introduction This division contains guidelines for drainage system design and establishes a policy for recognized and established engineering design of storm drain facilities
Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory
Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory What would happen if your dam were to fail? This is a question that most dam owners hope they will never have to answer. However it is a question you, as a responsible
DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods
DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES Run-off Analysis Methods This document sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications for the
Appendix J Online Questionnaire
Appendix J Online Questionnaire In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, this questionnaire was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB control number and expiration date
BIG CREEK Nos. 1 AND 2 (FERC Project No. 2175) VOLUME 1 (BOOK 1 OF 27 BOOKS) INITIAL STATEMENT, EXHIBITS A, B, C, D AND H (PUBLIC INFORMATION)
BIG CREEK Nos. 1 AND 2 (FERC Project No. 2175) VOLUME 1 (BOOK 1 OF 27 BOOKS) INITIAL STATEMENT, EXHIBITS A, B, C, D AND H (PUBLIC INFORMATION) CD NO. 1 OF 19 CDS Initial Statement Exhibit A: Description
https://orm.usace.army.mil/orm2/f?p=106:34:4198546103662037::no::
Page 1 of 6 APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers JD Status: DRAFT SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
EFB 496.10/696.03 Online Wetland Restoration Techniques Class Syllabus
EFB 496.10/696.03 Wetland Restoration Techniques Online Class Syllabus SUNY-ESF College of Environmental Science and Forestry Summer Session II 2015 Wetland Restoration Techniques is a graduate and undergraduate
Integrated Restoration Prioritization
Integrated Restoration Prioritization Habitat Restoration and Environmental Monitoring Projects Section Restoration Services Division Definition Restoration Prioritization is a process of combining various
Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy [email protected]
Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy [email protected] Wetland study slide Water Quality NRE goals in watershed plans Protect habitat that remains.
Stormwater/Wetland Pond Construction Inspection Checklist
: Construction Inspection ChecklistsTools Stormwater/Wetland Pond Construction Inspection Checklist Project: Location: Site Status: Date: Time: Inspector: SATISFACTORY/ UNSATISFACTORY COMMENTS Pre-Construction/Materials
1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk
1 Introduction 1.1 Key objective The aim of this study is to identify and assess possible options for improving the quality of the river channel and habitats in the River South Esk catchment whilst helping
Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services
Restoring Ecosystems Ecosystem Restoration Services 2 Ecosystem Restoration Services AECOM s integrated approach sciencebased planning, with innovative design and execution delivers sustainable and cost-effective
