PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT



Similar documents
MOCK-UP TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TUBELITE, INC. PROJECT: 200 Series Curtain Wall Mock-Up

TEST REPORT. Report No.: A Rendered to: BAMCO INC. Middlesex, New Jersey. PRODUCT TYPE: Wall Cladding System SERIES/MODEL: Dry Concept

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TFC A DIVISION OF CENTURION INDUSTRIES, INC. Garrett, Indiana

ASTM E 1886 / ASTM E 1996 AND ASTM E 283, ASTM E 330, ASTM E 331 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: BEKAERT SPECIALTY FILMS, LLC

REPORT NUMBER: COQ-003 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: July 19, 2013

Quality Assurance and Diagnostic Water Leakage Field Check of Installed Storefronts, Curtain Walls and Sloped Glazing Systems

Evaluating the Field Performance of Windows and Curtain Walls of Large Buildings

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: BAMCO INC. PRODUCT TYPE: ACM Wall Panel Systems

continuing professional education. As such, it construed to be an approval or endorsement by

FIELD TESTING SERVICES

Architectural Testing

ASTM E 1886 and ASTM E 1996 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: NORSE, INC.

How To Test For An Architectural Test

SECTION METAL WALL PANELS

Assessing Curtain Walls

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: GLASSCRAFT DOOR COMPANY

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: UNITED STATES ALUMINUM CORPORATION. SERIES/MODEL: 450 Center Glaze PRODUCT TYPE: Aluminum Curtain Wall

foot skylight) is enough to knock a worker off their feet. A 10 mph wind gust on a 5 x 6 skylight develops a wind force of 270 lbs.

WATER LEAKAGE IN GLAZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEMS:

DuPont Tyvek Commercial Air Barrier Assemblies Exceed Air Barrier Association of America, ASHRAE 90.1

SECTION ALUMINUM FRAMED ENTRANCES and STOREFRONTS. System 402 Flush-Glazed Screw Spline Storefront

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CERAMITEX RVR SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH AAMA FOR PRESSURE EQUALIZATION BEHAVIOR & WATER PENETRATION RESISTANCE

City of San Diego, CWP Guidelines

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: DEXERDRY. For: Deck Weatherproofing System Installed with AZEK Deck Boards

ASTM E 1886 and ASTM E 1996 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: Atrium Companies, Inc. SERIES/MODEL: 50/305 HS PRODUCT TYPE: Vinyl Horizontal Slider

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Report No.: B Rendered to: AMERICAN PRODUCTS, INC Tampa, Florida

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: ARCHITECTURAL METAL SOLUTIONS, INC.

SECTION SERIES 1500 VINYL PATIO DOORS

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Report No.: B Rendered to: CAPTIVEAIRE, INC. Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

UL 580 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES. SERIES/MODEL: MW Vector PRODUCT TYPE: Ceiling System, 3' OC

WATER TESTING MISCONCEPTIONS: F ENESTRATION PRODUCT CERTIFICATION AND FORENSIC INVESTIGATION OF BUILDING LEAKAGE

Total Building Commissioning: Case Study of the U.S. District Courthouse in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Residential Roofing Guide

The replacement or modification of existing windows shall comply with the following requirements:

JANUARY, 2016 TR-7100 Windows (Fixed) 1 EC ALUMINUM WINDOWS Guide Specs

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

Field Water Testing - Lessons Learned

Excerpts from the Canadian National Building Code (NBC)

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: TREMCO INCORPORATED. SERIES/MODEL: Proglaze ETA PRODUCT TYPE: Engineered Transition Assembly

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY State Fire Marshal Division STATEMENT OF POLICY. State Fire Marshal

RESIDENTIAL ROOFING & RE-ROOFING, ROOF VENTILATION AND ROOF SHEATHING REQUIREMENTS MICHIGAN RESIDENTIAL CODE 2000

TEST REPORT. Report No.: B Rendered to: CROFT, LLC. Magnolia, Mississippi. PRODUCT TYPE: Aluminum Single Hung Window SERIES/MODEL: 95

Scottsdale, Arizona. Presentation by: Hermes Norero, P.E. President and CEO

SECTION MORTUARY REFRIGERATORS

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: GLASSCRAFT DOOR COMPANY

REPORT NUMBER: MID-001 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: JUNE 27, 2012

Sun Windows General Information Sun New Construction Window Installation Instructions

Preventing Ice Dams on Roofs

Specifying Windows. Performance Standards

EDD-401. Stationary Louver Dual Drainable Blade. Application and Design. Standard Construction

EAST LYME HIGH SCHOOL

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

Installer Training and Certification Overview

March 14, Installation of Bay, Bow and Garden Windows

Avoiding Air Barrier Pitfalls

resist water infiltration and avoid water damage to buildings.

Appendix B Florida Building Code Building Section Public Shelter Design Criteria

SANITARY SEWER SPECIFICATIONS

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

The minimum reinforcement for the stem wall is the placement of:

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

EASY$ TIP SHEETS. Energy Advice Saving Yukoners Money

10DBMC International Conference On Durability of Building Materials and Components LYON [France] April 2005

AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A TEST REPORT. Rendered to: EAGLE WINDOW & DOOR COMPANY

SECTION STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS

September 3, Ric Boyd, Public Works Director Ketchikan Gateway Borough 344 Front St. Ketchikan, AK 99901

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: INTERNATIONAL WINDOW Hayward, California. PRODUCT TYPE: Aluminum Hopper SERIES/MODEL: 7222

Mario D. Gonçalves, Patenaude-Trempe 1 Pierre Gendron, Patenaude-Trempe 2 Tony Colantonio, PWGSC 3. Abstract

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY Issued: August 1, LARKIN CENTER 1605 JOSEPH DRIVE MIDLAND MICHIGAN (989)

CONDENSATION IN REFRIDGERATED BUILDINGS

1. Concrete: T W L / 27 = Concrete C.Y. Multiply Feet Thickness x Feet Width x Feet Length / 27 = Cubic Yards.

Code of Standard Practice for Timber Frame Structures

After reading this lesson you will be able to: 12.3 IMPORTANCE OF ROOF 12.4 TYPES OF ROOF IN A HOUSE

SCENIC VIEW SV 10 SECTION SOLAR CONTROL FILMS

Page & Turnbull imagining change in historic environments through design, research, and technology

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

COMMONLY USED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODES

Impact-Resistant Windows and Sliding Glass Doors

Residential Decks. Planning and Development Services Department

Basic Selection & Proper Application of Overhead Air Distribution Devices

BECx& Building Airtightness. Presented by: Eric Amhaus Principal

IAN BENNIE AND ASSOCIATES TEST REPORT NO S2 AWNING WITH FIXED WINDOW PROTOTYPE TEST to AS for. Finesse Window Systems Australia

This handout is a guide only and does not contain all of the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code or city ordinances.

The better way to build TM. Installation Manual. FOUNDATION SIPs & FROST WALLS SIPs

SECTION STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING

SECTION SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS 521 SERIES ALUMINUM SECTIONAL OVERHEAD DOORS

CHAPTER 24 GLASS AND GLAZING

Asphalt Shingle Application Requirements

Approval Standard for Class 1 Exterior Wall Systems

Testing Water Penetration Resistance of Window Systems Exposed to Realistic Dynamic Air Pressures

INSTALLATION OF A BAY WINDOW

Exhaust Calculation Booklet

CF-Mesa, CF-Light Mesa, CF-Flute, CF-Metl-Plank, CF-Striated, CF-Santa Fe, CF-Architectural Flat, CF...

Transcription:

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT CCLW JOB #08-5152-1 DATES OF FORMAL TESTING SEPTEMBER 19 & 23, 2008 TEST LOCATION CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING LABORATORY WEST 4751 WEST STATE STREET, SUITE B ONTARIO, CA 91762 PH: 909-591-1789 Fax: 909-627-9020

MOCK UP DEESCRIPTION The scope of the mock-up specimen for testing was one (1), shop glazed unitized wall system consisting of three (3) modules in width by two (2) modules in height of a custom curtain wall system with 1 3/16 glazing. The mock up measured overall 12-6 wide by 22 high. For a complete description and framing details, see drawings, sheets 1-41, at end of this report. The report is not complete unless drawings marked and stamped by the laboratory are included. All references to positive pressures are considered inward acting and negative is outward. The mock up was tested in accordance with each applicable AAMA and ASTM standard. TEST EQUIPMENT The specimen was installed into a test chamber constructed of structural angles, beams, and columns covered with steel and plywood bulkheads, accessible through a bulkhead door. Air infiltration was measured with a Meriam laminar flow element and a Dwyer electronic manometer. Water was applied from a vertical spray rack mounted 22 to 24 from the specimen. The rack was equipped with swirl-type nozzles spaced two (2) feet on center, vertically and horizontally, which delivered five (5) gallons of water per hour per square foot of wall frontal area. Dynamic winds were generated by a Curtis Wright 3350 radial aircraft engine with a three (3) bladed propeller, 14-5 diameter, which formulates typical and atypical wind conditions. Pressure differentials were measured with a Dwyer electronic manometer (DM-2). The pressure differential between the exterior and interior of the chamber was created by a positive and negative blower system. WITNESSED BY (all or partial) Katherine Miller Anurag Jain Ryan Burke Michael Hathhorn Scott Acevedo Eric Thatcher Eric Schroter David Mirelez Cassie Harker Nancy Bjurstrom Glenn Allen Subir Ghosh Jack W. Jackson Chad C. Jackson EHDD Architecture Weidlinger Associates, Inc. Simpson, Gumpertz & Heger, Inc. Guarantee Glass, Inc. Guarantee Glass, Inc. Advanced Glazing Systems, LLC Advanced Glazing Systems, LLC Advanced Glazing Systems, LLC Construction Consulting Laboratory West Construction Consulting Laboratory West PAGE 2 of 7

FORMAL TEST SEQUENCE SEPTEMBER 19, 2008 The weather conditions at 9:30 AM were 72 F, 44% RH, calm winds and a clear sky. PRELOAD To set the specimen for testing, a positive pressure differential of 15.0 psf, 50% of design load, was applied to the specimen while exhausting air for the air infiltration test. It was held for ten seconds and then reduced to 6.24 psf to complete the air test. There was no indication of failure. AIR INFILTRATION TEST per ASTM E283-04 The exterior of the wall area was sealed with a visqueen material and tape. The exterior face of the specimen was then subjected to a positive static pressure differential of 6.24 psf. This infiltration reading represented the amount of air infiltration through the chamber (tare). The visqueen was removed and another reading was recorded at 6.24 psf pressure differential representing the amount of air infiltration through the wall specimen and the chamber (gross). Subtracting the first reading from the last yields the net air infiltration through the specimen. Air infiltration shall not exceed 0.06 cfm per square foot of wall area. Net allowable based on measurements was 20.4 cfm total. (12.5 x 22 = 274 s/f x 0.06 = 16.4 cfm total. : Specimen passed. The Titon trickle vents were taped over and not included in the air infiltration readings. Net air infiltration was measured at 6.2 cfm total. STATIC WATER PERATION TEST per ASTM E331-00 Water was applied to the exterior face of the specimen, at a minimum rate of five (5) gallons per hour per square foot of wall frontal area, in such a way as to completely cover the exterior face of the specimen. At the same time, a positive differential static pressure of 15.0 psf was applied to the face of the specimen. The application of pressure and water was maintained for a period of fifteen (15) minutes, with observers viewing the interior of the specimen. Water leakage is defined as uncontrolled water infiltrating the system or appearing on systems normally exposed interior surfaces from sources other than condensation. Water controlled by flashing and gutters that is drained back to the exterior and cannot damage adjacent materials or finishes is not water leakage. : Specimen passed. There was no water leakage. PAGE 3 of 7

DYNAMIC WATER PERATION TEST per AAMA 501.1-05 The specimen was subjected to a dynamic wind load pressure equivalent of 15.0 psf (76.5 mph wind speed) only, with a water application of five (5) gallons per hour per square foot of wall frontal area for duration of fifteen (15) minutes. There shall be no uncontrolled water leakage, same as the static water test above. Specimen passed. The Titon trickle vents were opened during the dynamic water test to demonstrate that the vent is weatherproof during a rain storm. There was no water leakage noted. UNIFORM STRUCTURAL TEST @ DESIGN ASTM E-330-02 The test specimen was subjected to a positive load of 15.0 psf. The pressure was held for ten (10) seconds and released. Indicators were set. The test specimen was subjected to a positive load of 30.0 psf, held for ten (10) seconds and released. Indicators were read and data was recorded. The blower system, along with the measuring equipment, was then reversed. The test specimen was subjected to a negative load of 22.5 psf. The pressure was held for ten (10) seconds and released. Indicators were set. The test specimen was subjected to a negative load of 45.0 psf, held for ten (10) seconds and released. Indicators were read and data was recorded. At design load, limit deflection of framing members, in a direction normal to wall plane, to. Specimen passed. All measured structural spans complied with specified criteria. See elevation drawing for dial indicator locations. See Charts #1 and #2 on page 6 for deflection and permanent set results (reference bold number xx/xx for deflection/permanent set) REPEAT AIR INFILTRATION TEST per ASTM E283-04 Similar procedure and same criteria as previous air infiltration test. (allowed 16.4 cfm) Specimen passed. Gross leakage was measured and compared to the gross leakage obtained at start of testing. With the wall and chamber wet and the windows adjusted, the difference was 4.0 cfm less. This indicates that there was no detrimental change in the air infiltration due to the structural design load tests. The Titon trickle vents remained taped. PAGE 4 of 7

REPEAT STATIC WATER PERATION TEST per ASTM E331-00 Same procedure and same criteria as previous static water penetration test. Specimen passed. 15.0 psf: There was no water leakage noted. UNIFORM STRUCTURAL PROOF LOAD TEST per ASTM E330-02 The test specimen was subjected to a positive load of 22.5 psf (75% design load). The pressure was held for ten (10) seconds and released, with indicators then set to zero. The test specimen was subjected to a positive load of 45.0 psf (150% design load), held for ten (10) seconds and released. Indicators were read and all data recorded. The blower system along with the measuring equipment was reversed. The test specimen was subjected to a negative load of 33.75 psf (75% design load). The pressure was held for ten (10) seconds and released, with indicators set to zero. The test specimen was subjected to a negative load of 67.5 psf (150% design load), held for ten (10) seconds and released. Indicators were read and all data recorded. No failures or permanent set in excess of L/1000 is allowed. Specimen passed. All measured structural spans complied with specified criteria. See elevation drawing for dial indicator locations. See Charts #3 and #4 on page 7 for deflection and permanent set results (reference bold number xx/xx for deflection/permanent set). END OF TESTING PAGE 5 of 7

STRUCTURAL INGS 100% DESIGN LOAD CCLW REPORT NO: 08-5152-1 9-19-08 CHART 1 OF 4 TEST PRESSURE = 30.0 PSF POSITIVE 1 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 BOTTOM 10/01 - - ANCH- 2 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (3) STK JT BOT 10/01 07 - - 3 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (2) STK JT TOP 17/03 07 - - 4 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (1&5) MID 33/00 25/00 75 132 5 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 TOP 07/00 - - ANCH- 6 HORZ. MULL 18/PMU_3.06 MID 03/01 03/01 37 64.75 7 VISION GLASS 1 3/16 INSUL CENTER 21/01 21/01-64.75 CHART 2 OF 4 TEST PRESSURE = 45.0 PSF NEGATIVE 1 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 BOTTOM 04/00 - - ANCH- 2 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (3) STK JT BOT 03/00 07 - - 3 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (2) STK JT TOP 06/01 07 - - 4 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (1&5) MID 27/01 21/01 75 132 5 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 TOP 08/01 - - ANCH 6 HORZ. MULL 18/PMU_3.06 MID 04/01 04/01 37 64.75 7 VISION GLASS 1 3/16 INSUL CENTER 34/00 34/00-64.75 INGS ARE IN HUNDRETHS OF INCH DEFL. LIMIT = INGS ARE DEFLECTION/PERMANENT SET PAGE 6 of 7

STRUCTURAL INGS 150% PROOF LOAD CCLW REPORT NO: 08-5152-1 9-19-08 CHART 3 OF 4 TEST PRESSURE = 45.0 PSF POSITIVE 1 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 BOTTOM 14/01 - - ANCH- 2 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (3) STK JT BOT 17/01 02 - - 3 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (2) STK JT TOP 36/03 02 - - 4 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (1&5) MID 57/02 44/01 13 132 5 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 TOP 12/02 - - ANCH 6 HORZ. MULL 18/PMU_3.06 MID 04/01 04/01 06 64.75 7 VISION GLASS 1 3/16 INSUL CENTER 28/01 28/01-64.75 CHART 4 OF 4 TEST PRESSURE = 67.5 PSF NEGATIVE 1 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 BOTTOM 05/02 - - ANCH- 2 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (3) STK JT BOT 04/00 00 - - 3 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (2) STK JT TOP 07/00 00 - - 4 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 (1&5) MID 52/02 40/01 13 132 5 VERT. MULL 02/PMU_4.02 TOP 20/01 - - ANCH 6 HORZ. MULL 18/PMU_3.06 MID 05/01 05/01 06 64.75 7 VISION GLASS 1 3/16 INSUL CENTER 49/01 49/01-64.75 INGS ARE IN HUNDRETHS OF INCH PERM. SET LIMIT = L/1000 INGS ARE DEFLECTION/PERMANENT SET PAGE 7 of 7