Trails in Quantum Mechanics and Surroundings



Similar documents


Bud row 1. Chips row 2. Coors. Bud. row 3 Milk. Chips. Cheesies. Coors row 4 Cheesies. Diapers. Milk. Diapers







Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona



gloser og kommentarer til Macbeth ( sidetal henviser til "Illustrated Shakespeare") GS 96

Client URL. List of object servers that contain object



FRAME. ... Data Slot S. Data Slot 1 Data Slot 2 C T S R T S. No. of Simultaneous Users. User 1 User 2 User 3. User U. No.






Application. handle layer. access layer. reference layer. transport layer. ServerImplementation. Stub. Skeleton. ClientReference.

(a) Hidden Terminal Problem. (b) Direct Interference. (c) Self Interference



(a) Original Images. (b) Stitched Image

application require ment? reliability read/write caching disk

hospital physician(2)... disease(4) treat(2) W305(2) leukemia(3) leukemia(2) cancer

Sliding Window ... Basic Window S[0] S[k 1] S[k] Digests Digests Digests

Author manuscript, published in "1st International IBM Cloud Academy Conference - ICA CON 2012 (2012)" hal , version 1-20 Apr 2012

Primitives. Ad Hoc Network. (a) User Applications Distributed Primitives. Routing Protocol. Ad Hoc Network. (b)





universe nonself self detection system false negatives false positives

In Proceedings of the 1999 USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS 99) Boulder, Colorado, October 1999





Chen Ding Yutao Zhong Computer Science Department University of Rochester Rochester, New York U.S.A.



Finding Near Rank Deficiency in Matrix Products


TheHow and Why of Having a Successful Home Office System


How to create OpenDocument URL s with SAP BusinessObjects BI 4.0


HTML Codes - Characters and symbols

The ASCII Character Set

PROTOCOLS FOR SECURE REMOTE DATABASE ACCESS WITH APPROXIMATE MATCHING


PROCESSOR IS OCCUPIED BY T i

Archiving Scientific Data


Real Business Cycles with Disequilibrium in the Labor Market: A Comparison of the U.S. and German Economies

3.1 State Space Models

Downloaded from SPIE Digital Library on 29 Aug 2011 to Terms of Use:

Open Programmable Architecture for Java-enabled Network Devices

autocorrelation analysis

Resource Management for Scalable Disconnected Access to Web Services

Optimal Crawling Strategies for Web Search Engines

desired behaviour (global constraints) composite system putative behaviour: putative agents, actions, etc.

Applications. Decode/ Encode ... Meta- Data. Data. Shares. Multi-read/ Multi-write. Intermediary Software ... Storage Nodes


drop probability maxp

An Investigation of Geographic Mapping Techniques for Internet Hosts

HowPros and Cons of Owning a Home-Based Business

1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics

ASCII control characters (character code 0-31)

é é ä ä é ö é é ò é ó é Ü ä Ü ä ä

P1 P2 P3. Home (p) 1. Diff (p) 2. Invalidation (p) 3. Page Request (p) 4. Page Response (p)

Properties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO

Windows - Alt Key Numeric Codes

Finite speed of propagation in porous media. by mass transportation methods

Inner products on R n, and more

Best Place to Find Information For a Wedding?

MATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.

Transcription:

A Remark on the Hamiltonian for Three Identical Bosons with Zero-Range Interactions Giulia Basti Dipartimento di Matematica Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza 09 July 2015 Trails in Quantum Mechanics and Surroundings Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 1 / 15

Outline 1 Introduction 2 Explicit Construction 3 Fermionic Case 4 Bosonic Case Main References [FM] L. Faddeev, R.A. Minlos, Soviet Phys. Dokl., 6 (1962). [MeM] A.M. Melnikov, R.A. Minlos, Adv. Soviet Math., 5 (1991). [CDFMT] M. Correggi, G. Dell Antonio, D. Finco, A. Michelangeli, A. Teta, Rev. Math. Phys., 24 (2012). [CFT] M. Correggi, D. Finco, A. Teta, Europhysics Letters, (2015 ). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 2 / 15

Outline 1 Introduction 2 Explicit Construction 3 Fermionic Case 4 Bosonic Case Main References [FM] L. Faddeev, R.A. Minlos, Soviet Phys. Dokl., 6 (1962). [MeM] A.M. Melnikov, R.A. Minlos, Adv. Soviet Math., 5 (1991). [CDFMT] M. Correggi, G. Dell Antonio, D. Finco, A. Michelangeli, A. Teta, Rev. Math. Phys., 24 (2012). [CFT] M. Correggi, D. Finco, A. Teta, Europhysics Letters, (2015 ). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 2 / 15

Outline 1 Introduction 2 Explicit Construction 3 Fermionic Case 4 Bosonic Case Main References [FM] L. Faddeev, R.A. Minlos, Soviet Phys. Dokl., 6 (1962). [MeM] A.M. Melnikov, R.A. Minlos, Adv. Soviet Math., 5 (1991). [CDFMT] M. Correggi, G. Dell Antonio, D. Finco, A. Michelangeli, A. Teta, Rev. Math. Phys., 24 (2012). [CFT] M. Correggi, D. Finco, A. Teta, Europhysics Letters, (2015 ). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 2 / 15

Outline 1 Introduction 2 Explicit Construction 3 Fermionic Case 4 Bosonic Case Main References [FM] L. Faddeev, R.A. Minlos, Soviet Phys. Dokl., 6 (1962). [MeM] A.M. Melnikov, R.A. Minlos, Adv. Soviet Math., 5 (1991). [CDFMT] M. Correggi, G. Dell Antonio, D. Finco, A. Michelangeli, A. Teta, Rev. Math. Phys., 24 (2012). [CFT] M. Correggi, D. Finco, A. Teta, Europhysics Letters, (2015 ). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 2 / 15

Outline 1 Introduction 2 Explicit Construction 3 Fermionic Case 4 Bosonic Case Main References [FM] L. Faddeev, R.A. Minlos, Soviet Phys. Dokl., 6 (1962). [MeM] A.M. Melnikov, R.A. Minlos, Adv. Soviet Math., 5 (1991). [CDFMT] M. Correggi, G. Dell Antonio, D. Finco, A. Michelangeli, A. Teta, Rev. Math. Phys., 24 (2012). [CFT] M. Correggi, D. Finco, A. Teta, Europhysics Letters, (2015 ). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 2 / 15

Zero-Range Interaction System of three particles interacting via zero-range two-body interactions. Formally 3ÿ 1 H = x 2m i + ÿ ij (x i x j ) i=1 i i<j where x i œ R 3, X =(x 1, x 2, x 3 ) œ R 9 and ij œ R. Motivations Nuclear Physics Ultra-Cold Quantum Gases We look for a rigorous definition: self-adjoint operator (crucial to define the dynamics), possibly bounded from below (in order to ensure the stability of the system). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 3 / 15

Zero-Range Interaction System of three particles interacting via zero-range two-body interactions. Formally 3ÿ 1 H = x 2m i + ÿ ij (x i x j ) i=1 i i<j where x i œ R 3, X =(x 1, x 2, x 3 ) œ R 9 and ij œ R. Motivations Nuclear Physics Ultra-Cold Quantum Gases We look for a rigorous definition: self-adjoint operator (crucial to define the dynamics), possibly bounded from below (in order to ensure the stability of the system). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 3 / 15

Zero-Range Interaction System of three particles interacting via zero-range two-body interactions. Formally 3ÿ 1 H = x 2m i + ÿ ij (x i x j ) i=1 i i<j where x i œ R 3, X =(x 1, x 2, x 3 ) œ R 9 and ij œ R. Motivations Nuclear Physics Ultra-Cold Quantum Gases We look for a rigorous definition: self-adjoint operator (crucial to define the dynamics), possibly bounded from below (in order to ensure the stability of the system). Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 3 / 15

Rigorous Definition Note that So we consider H = H 0  if  vanishes on each hyperplane {x i = x j } ÊH 0 = 1 2m i 3ÿ i=1 x i D( Ê H 0 )=C Œ 0 1 R 9 \ i<j{x 2 i = x j } symmetric but not self-adjoint. = by definition any self-adjoint extension of Ê H 0, di erent from H 0, is a Hamiltonian for a system of three particles in R 3 with zero-range interactions. The problem is to give an explicit construction. = We proceed by analogy with the well known two-body case. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 4 / 15

Rigorous Definition Note that So we consider H = H 0  if  vanishes on each hyperplane {x i = x j } ÊH 0 = 1 2m i 3ÿ i=1 x i D( Ê H 0 )=C Œ 0 1 R 9 \ i<j{x 2 i = x j } symmetric but not self-adjoint. = by definition any self-adjoint extension of Ê H 0, di erent from H 0, is a Hamiltonian for a system of three particles in R 3 with zero-range interactions. The problem is to give an explicit construction. = We proceed by analogy with the well known two-body case. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 4 / 15

Rigorous Definition Note that So we consider H = H 0  if  vanishes on each hyperplane {x i = x j } ÊH 0 = 1 2m i 3ÿ i=1 x i D( Ê H 0 )=C Œ 0 1 R 9 \ i<j{x 2 i = x j } symmetric but not self-adjoint. = by definition any self-adjoint extension of Ê H 0, di erent from H 0, is a Hamiltonian for a system of three particles in R 3 with zero-range interactions. The problem is to give an explicit construction. = We proceed by analogy with the well known two-body case. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 4 / 15

Rigorous Definition Note that So we consider H = H 0  if  vanishes on each hyperplane {x i = x j } ÊH 0 = 1 2m i 3ÿ i=1 x i D( Ê H 0 )=C Œ 0 1 R 9 \ i<j{x 2 i = x j } symmetric but not self-adjoint. = by definition any self-adjoint extension of Ê H 0, di erent from H 0, is a Hamiltonian for a system of three particles in R 3 with zero-range interactions. The problem is to give an explicit construction. = We proceed by analogy with the well known two-body case. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 4 / 15

STM Extensions STM extensions H a of  H 0 : H a  = H 0  if x i = x j and  œd(h a ) satisfies the boundary conditions A 1  ƒ x i x j æ0 x i x j 1 B Q ij (r ij, x k )+o(1), a r ij = m ix i + m j x j m i + m j. In general H a is neither self-adjoint nor bounded from below and its s.a. extensions are in general unbounded from below (Thomas e ect [FM], [MeM]). We show s.a. and boundness from below for two systems using the quadratic form (a = Œ): F[Â] =(Â, HÂ) for any  œd(h) = If F is closed and bounded from below then H is self-adjoint and bounded from below. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 5 / 15

STM Extensions STM extensions H a of  H 0 : H a  = H 0  if x i = x j and  œd(h a ) satisfies the boundary conditions A 1  ƒ x i x j æ0 x i x j 1 B Q ij (r ij, x k )+o(1), a r ij = m ix i + m j x j m i + m j. In general H a is neither self-adjoint nor bounded from below and its s.a. extensions are in general unbounded from below (Thomas e ect [FM], [MeM]). We show s.a. and boundness from below for two systems using the quadratic form (a = Œ): F[Â] =(Â, HÂ) for any  œd(h) = If F is closed and bounded from below then H is self-adjoint and bounded from below. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 5 / 15

STM Extensions STM extensions H a of  H 0 : H a  = H 0  if x i = x j and  œd(h a ) satisfies the boundary conditions A 1  ƒ x i x j æ0 x i x j 1 B Q ij (r ij, x k )+o(1), a r ij = m ix i + m j x j m i + m j. In general H a is neither self-adjoint nor bounded from below and its s.a. extensions are in general unbounded from below (Thomas e ect [FM], [MeM]). We show s.a. and boundness from below for two systems using the quadratic form (a = Œ): F[Â] =(Â, HÂ) for any  œd(h) = If F is closed and bounded from below then H is self-adjoint and bounded from below. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 5 / 15

STM Extensions STM extensions H a of  H 0 : H a  = H 0  if x i = x j and  œd(h a ) satisfies the boundary conditions A 1  ƒ x i x j æ0 x i x j 1 B Q ij (r ij, x k )+o(1), a r ij = m ix i + m j x j m i + m j. In general H a is neither self-adjoint nor bounded from below and its s.a. extensions are in general unbounded from below (Thomas e ect [FM], [MeM]). We show s.a. and boundness from below for two systems using the quadratic form (a = Œ): F[Â] =(Â, HÂ) for any  œd(h) = If F is closed and bounded from below then H is self-adjoint and bounded from below. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 5 / 15

The Potential Produced by Q ij Let us introduce the potential produced by the charges Q ij : (GQ)(X) = ÿ 1 (2fi) i<j 5 dpe ˆQ ix P ij (p i + p j, p k ) µ ij h 0 (P) where h 0 (P) = p2 1 2m 1 + p2 2 2m 2 + p2 3 2m 3 Properties H 0 (GQ)(X) =2fi q ij and µ ij = m i m j m i +m j. 1 µ ij Q ij (r ij, x k ) (x i x j ) (GQ)(X) ƒ Q ij(r ij,x k ) x i x j ( Q) ij (r ij, x k )+o(1) if x i x j æ0 Writing  = w + GQ the boundary conditions become w smooth lim ij(r ij, x k ). x i x j æ0 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 6 / 15

The Potential Produced by Q ij Let us introduce the potential produced by the charges Q ij : (GQ)(X) = ÿ 1 (2fi) i<j 5 dpe ˆQ ix P ij (p i + p j, p k ) µ ij h 0 (P) where h 0 (P) = p2 1 2m 1 + p2 2 2m 2 + p2 3 2m 3 Properties H 0 (GQ)(X) =2fi q ij and µ ij = m i m j m i +m j. 1 µ ij Q ij (r ij, x k ) (x i x j ) (GQ)(X) ƒ Q ij(r ij,x k ) x i x j ( Q) ij (r ij, x k )+o(1) if x i x j æ0 Writing  = w + GQ the boundary conditions become w smooth lim ij(r ij, x k ). x i x j æ0 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 6 / 15

The Potential Produced by Q ij Let us introduce the potential produced by the charges Q ij : (GQ)(X) = ÿ 1 (2fi) i<j 5 dpe ˆQ ix P ij (p i + p j, p k ) µ ij h 0 (P) where h 0 (P) = p2 1 2m 1 + p2 2 2m 2 + p2 3 2m 3 Properties H 0 (GQ)(X) =2fi q ij and µ ij = m i m j m i +m j. 1 µ ij Q ij (r ij, x k ) (x i x j ) (GQ)(X) ƒ Q ij(r ij,x k ) x i x j ( Q) ij (r ij, x k )+o(1) if x i x j æ0 Writing  = w + GQ the boundary conditions become w smooth lim ij(r ij, x k ). x i x j æ0 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 6 / 15

Quadratic Form Defining D Á = {X œ R 9 : x i x j >Á} we have (Â, HÂ) =lim dx ÂH 0  Áæ0 D Á =(w, H 0 w)+ lim dx GQ H 0 w Áæ0 D Á =(w, H 0 w)+ ÿ 2fi µ i<j ij Q 1 c ÿ ijk 2Ÿ a 2fiµ ij µ jk dpdk ij (k, p) 2 Û µij M m k (m i + m j ) k2 + µ ij M p2 ij (k jk, p) jk (k ij, p) dpdk ij dk jk kij 2 2µ ij + k2 jk 2µ jk + k ij k jk m j where ij (k, p) = ˆQ ij ( m i +m j M p k, m k M p + k) with M = q i m i. + p2 2M R d b Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 7 / 15

Quadratic Form Defining D Á = {X œ R 9 : x i x j >Á} we have (Â, HÂ) =lim dx ÂH 0  Áæ0 D Á =(w, H 0 w)+ lim dx GQ H 0 w Áæ0 D Á =(w, H 0 w)+ ÿ 2fi µ i<j ij Q 1 c ÿ ijk 2Ÿ a 2fiµ ij µ jk dpdk ij (k, p) 2 Û µij M m k (m i + m j ) k2 + µ ij M p2 ij (k jk, p) jk (k ij, p) dpdk ij dk jk kij 2 2µ ij + k2 jk 2µ jk + k ij k jk m j where ij (k, p) = ˆQ ij ( m i +m j M p k, m k M p + k) with M = q i m i. + p2 2M R d b Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 7 / 15

2 Fermions + 1 Let us consider two identical fermions (e.g. 1 and 3) of mass m interacting with a di erent particle (e.g. 2) of mass m 0. Let = m m 0 the mass ratio. Hilbert space: L 2 asym(r 9 ) 13 = 0 and 12 = 23 = because of antisymmetry Energy form D[F] ={ œ L 2 asym(r 9 ): = w + G,w œ H 1 asym(r 9 ), œ H 1/2 (R 6 )} F[Â] =F 0 [w]+ 2(1 + ) mfi where F 0 [w] =(w, H 0 w) and [ ] = s dp p [ ] = s dp( p diag [ ]+ p o [ ]) is a form acting on the charge. [ ] Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 8 / 15

2 Fermions + 1 Let us consider two identical fermions (e.g. 1 and 3) of mass m interacting with a di erent particle (e.g. 2) of mass m 0. Let = m m 0 the mass ratio. Hilbert space: L 2 asym(r 9 ) 13 = 0 and 12 = 23 = because of antisymmetry Energy form D[F] ={ œ L 2 asym(r 9 ): = w + G,w œ H 1 asym(r 9 ), œ H 1/2 (R 6 )} F[Â] =F 0 [w]+ 2(1 + ) mfi where F 0 [w] =(w, H 0 w) and [ ] = s dp p [ ] = s dp( p diag [ ]+ p o [ ]) is a form acting on the charge. [ ] Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 8 / 15

2 Fermions + 1 Let us consider two identical fermions (e.g. 1 and 3) of mass m interacting with a di erent particle (e.g. 2) of mass m 0. Let = m m 0 the mass ratio. Hilbert space: L 2 asym(r 9 ) 13 = 0 and 12 = 23 = because of antisymmetry Energy form D[F] ={ œ L 2 asym(r 9 ): = w + G,w œ H 1 asym(r 9 ), œ H 1/2 (R 6 )} F[Â] =F 0 [w]+ 2(1 + ) mfi where F 0 [w] =(w, H 0 w) and [ ] = s dp p [ ] = s dp( p diag [ ]+ p o [ ]) is a form acting on the charge. [ ] Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 8 / 15

Stability The following theorem has been proved [CDFMT]: Theorem The energy form is positive and closed if and only if Æ c where c is the solution of the equation ( ) = 2 3 4 1 + 2 5 3 46 Ô arcsin = 1 fi 1 + 2 1 + This implies that H is self-adjoint and bounded from below. Remark The result is optimal. For the analogous N + 1 problem there is only a partial result. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 9 / 15

Stability The following theorem has been proved [CDFMT]: Theorem The energy form is positive and closed if and only if Æ c where c is the solution of the equation ( ) = 2 3 4 1 + 2 5 3 46 Ô arcsin = 1 fi 1 + 2 1 + This implies that H is self-adjoint and bounded from below. Remark The result is optimal. For the analogous N + 1 problem there is only a partial result. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 9 / 15

3 Bosons Let us now consider a system composed by three identical bosons of mass 1. Hilbert space: L 2 sym(r 9 ) ij = for all i, j. Energy form: D[F] ={ œ L 2 sym(r 9 ): = w + G,w œ H 1 sym (R 9 ), œ H 1/2 (R 6 )} F[Â] =(w, H 0 w)+ 6 fi [ ] where [ ] = s dp p [ ] = s dp( p diag [ ]+ p o [ ]) with p diag [ ] =2fi 2 s Ò dk (k, p) 2 3 4 k2 + p2 6 p o [ ] = 2 s (k 1, p) (k 2, p) dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1 k 2 + p2 6 Such a form is well known to be unbounded. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 10 / 15

3 Bosons Let us now consider a system composed by three identical bosons of mass 1. Hilbert space: L 2 sym(r 9 ) ij = for all i, j. Energy form: D[F] ={ œ L 2 sym(r 9 ): = w + G,w œ H 1 sym (R 9 ), œ H 1/2 (R 6 )} F[Â] =(w, H 0 w)+ 6 fi [ ] where [ ] = s dp p [ ] = s dp( p diag [ ]+ p o [ ]) with p diag [ ] =2fi 2 s Ò dk (k, p) 2 3 4 k2 + p2 6 p o [ ] = 2 s (k 1, p) (k 2, p) dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1 k 2 + p2 6 Such a form is well known to be unbounded. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 10 / 15

3 Bosons Let us now consider a system composed by three identical bosons of mass 1. Hilbert space: L 2 sym(r 9 ) ij = for all i, j. Energy form: D[F] ={ œ L 2 sym(r 9 ): = w + G,w œ H 1 sym (R 9 ), œ H 1/2 (R 6 )} F[Â] =(w, H 0 w)+ 6 fi [ ] where [ ] = s dp p [ ] = s dp( p diag [ ]+ p o [ ]) with p diag [ ] =2fi 2 s Ò dk (k, p) 2 3 4 k2 + p2 6 p o [ ] = 2 s (k 1, p) (k 2, p) dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1 k 2 + p2 6 Such a form is well known to be unbounded. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 10 / 15

Main Result Theorem [ ] is positive for (k, p) = ÿ lm (k, p)y lm (, ). m,l l>0 Note: p diag [ ] positive p o [ ] not definite in sign Crucial point: p o [ ] Ø diag p [ ] with < 1. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 11 / 15

Main Result Theorem [ ] is positive for (k, p) = ÿ lm (k, p)y lm (, ). m,l l>0 Note: p diag [ ] positive p o [ ] not definite in sign Crucial point: p o [ ] Ø diag p [ ] with < 1. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 11 / 15

Main Result Theorem [ ] is positive for (k, p) = ÿ lm (k, p)y lm (, ). m,l l>0 Note: p diag [ ] positive p o [ ] not definite in sign Crucial point: p o [ ] Ø diag p [ ] with < 1. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 11 / 15

Main Result Theorem [ ] is positive for (k, p) = ÿ lm (k, p)y lm (, ). m,l l>0 Note: p diag [ ] positive p o [ ] not definite in sign Crucial point: p o [ ] Ø diag p [ ] with < 1. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 11 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [I]: p o [ ] = 2 dk 1 dk 2 (k 1, p) (k 2, p) k 2 1 + k2 2 + k 1 k 2 + p2 6 [exp. in spherical harmonics] = 4fi ÿ Œ Œ dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 lm (k 1, p)k2 2 lm (k 2, p) lm,l =0 0 0 1 P l (y) dy 1 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1k 2 y + p2 6 [terms with l odd are positive, terms with l even are decreasing in p] Ø 4fi ÿ Œ Œ dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 lm (k 1, p)k2 2 lm (k 2, p) lm,l =0 0 0 l even 1 P l (y) dy 1 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1k 2 y Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 12 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [I]: p o [ ] = 2 dk 1 dk 2 (k 1, p) (k 2, p) k 2 1 + k2 2 + k 1 k 2 + p2 6 [exp. in spherical harmonics] = 4fi ÿ Œ Œ dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 lm (k 1, p)k2 2 lm (k 2, p) lm,l =0 0 0 1 P l (y) dy 1 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1k 2 y + p2 6 [terms with l odd are positive, terms with l even are decreasing in p] Ø 4fi ÿ Œ Œ dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 lm (k 1, p)k2 2 lm (k 2, p) lm,l =0 0 0 l even 1 P l (y) dy 1 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1k 2 y Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 12 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [I]: p o [ ] = 2 dk 1 dk 2 (k 1, p) (k 2, p) k 2 1 + k2 2 + k 1 k 2 + p2 6 [exp. in spherical harmonics] = 4fi ÿ Œ Œ dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 lm (k 1, p)k2 2 lm (k 2, p) lm,l =0 0 0 1 P l (y) dy 1 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1k 2 y + p2 6 [terms with l odd are positive, terms with l even are decreasing in p] Ø 4fi ÿ Œ Œ dk 1 dk 2 k1 2 lm (k 1, p)k2 2 lm (k 2, p) lm,l =0 0 0 l even 1 P l (y) dy 1 k1 2 + k2 2 + k 1k 2 y Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 12 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [II]: Ë 1 diagonalization using: lm (q, p) = 2fi = ÿ lm,l =0 l even dqs l (q) lm (q, p) 2 È dxe ikx e 2x lm (e x, p) Ë S l (q) Æ S 2 (q) Æ for l > 0with =2fi 2 3 5 3 fi 3Ô 3 where b = Ø ÿ lm,l =0 l even fi/6 dt(12 sin 2 t 1), t 0 = arcsin(1/ Ô È 12) t 0 dq lm (q, p) 2 4 + 4fi 2 b 9 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 13 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [II]: Ë 1 diagonalization using: lm (q, p) = 2fi = ÿ lm,l =0 l even dqs l (q) lm (q, p) 2 È dxe ikx e 2x lm (e x, p) Ë S l (q) Æ S 2 (q) Æ for l > 0with =2fi 2 3 5 3 fi 3Ô 3 where b = Ø ÿ lm,l =0 l even fi/6 dt(12 sin 2 t 1), t 0 = arcsin(1/ Ô È 12) t 0 dq lm (q, p) 2 4 + 4fi 2 b 9 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 13 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [III]: [inverse transform] ÿ Œ = dkk 3 lm (k, p) 2 lm,l =0 0 l even [ =Ô 3fi 2 < 1andaddp2 6 ] = ÿ 2fi 2 Œ lm,l =0 l even [add terms for l odd ] = p diag [ ]. 0 dkk 2 Û 3 4 k2 + p2 6 lm(k, p) 2 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 14 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [III]: [inverse transform] ÿ Œ = dkk 3 lm (k, p) 2 lm,l =0 0 l even [ =Ô 3fi 2 < 1andaddp2 6 ] = ÿ 2fi 2 Œ lm,l =0 l even [add terms for l odd ] = p diag [ ]. 0 dkk 2 Û 3 4 k2 + p2 6 lm(k, p) 2 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 14 / 15

Sketch of the Proof p o [ ] Ø p diag [ ] [III]: [inverse transform] ÿ Œ = dkk 3 lm (k, p) 2 lm,l =0 0 l even [ =Ô 3fi 2 < 1andaddp2 6 ] = ÿ 2fi 2 Œ lm,l =0 l even [add terms for l odd ] = p diag [ ]. 0 dkk 2 Û 3 4 k2 + p2 6 lm(k, p) 2 Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 14 / 15

Thank you for the attention! Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 15 / 15

Appendix S 2 (q) Æ To obtain : So 1 S 2 (q) =fi 2 dy(3y 2 cosh(q arcsin y 2 1) ) cos(arcsin y 2 ) cosh(q fi 2 ) 1 A B 1 S 2 (0) =fi 2 dy(3y 2 1 5 1) 1 cos(arcsin( y = 2fi2 2 )) 3 fi 3Ô 3 Thus it s enough to show S 2 (q) S 2 (0) Æ 4fi 2 b 9, q Ø 0 (even function). 1 S 2 (q) S 2 (0) = fi 2 dy (3y 2 A 1) cos(arcsin y 2 ) 1 cosh(q arcsin y 2 ) B cosh(q fi 2 ) = 4fi 2 I 1 with I = s A B fi/6 0 dt(12 sin 2 t 1) 1 cosh(qt) cosh(q fi 2 ) Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 15 / 15

Appendix S 2 (q) Æ To obtain : So 1 S 2 (q) =fi 2 dy(3y 2 cosh(q arcsin y 2 1) ) cos(arcsin y 2 ) cosh(q fi 2 ) 1 A B 1 S 2 (0) =fi 2 dy(3y 2 1 5 1) 1 cos(arcsin( y = 2fi2 2 )) 3 fi 3Ô 3 Thus it s enough to show S 2 (q) S 2 (0) Æ 4fi 2 b 9, q Ø 0 (even function). 1 S 2 (q) S 2 (0) = fi 2 dy (3y 2 A 1) cos(arcsin y 2 ) 1 cosh(q arcsin y 2 ) B cosh(q fi 2 ) = 4fi 2 I 1 with I = s A B fi/6 0 dt(12 sin 2 t 1) 1 cosh(qt) cosh(q fi 2 ) Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 15 / 15

Appendix S 2 (q) Æ To obtain : So 1 S 2 (q) =fi 2 dy(3y 2 cosh(q arcsin y 2 1) ) cos(arcsin y 2 ) cosh(q fi 2 ) 1 A B 1 S 2 (0) =fi 2 dy(3y 2 1 5 1) 1 cos(arcsin( y = 2fi2 2 )) 3 fi 3Ô 3 Thus it s enough to show S 2 (q) S 2 (0) Æ 4fi 2 b 9, q Ø 0 (even function). 1 S 2 (q) S 2 (0) = fi 2 dy (3y 2 A 1) cos(arcsin y 2 ) 1 cosh(q arcsin y 2 ) B cosh(q fi 2 ) = 4fi 2 I 1 with I = s A B fi/6 0 dt(12 sin 2 t 1) 1 cosh(qt) cosh(q fi 2 ) Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 15 / 15

Appendix S 2 (q) Æ We want I Æ b 9 1 Ë 1 I Æ cosh(q fi 2 ) a +(b a) cosh where a = s t 0 0 dt 12 sin2 t 1. Introduce then I Æ cosh(q fi 2 ) + b 9. q fi 2 2 1 b cosh q fi 2È 6 1 10 2 1 g(q) =a + 9 b a cosh q fi 2 1 b cosh q fi 2 2 6 g(q) g(0) = b 9 > 0 g Õ (q) Ø 0 g(q) Ø 0 and I Æ b 9. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 15 / 15

Appendix S 2 (q) Æ We want I Æ b 9 1 Ë 1 I Æ cosh(q fi 2 ) a +(b a) cosh where a = s t 0 0 dt 12 sin2 t 1. Introduce then I Æ cosh(q fi 2 ) + b 9. q fi 2 2 1 b cosh q fi 2È 6 1 10 2 1 g(q) =a + 9 b a cosh q fi 2 1 b cosh q fi 2 2 6 g(q) g(0) = b 9 > 0 g Õ (q) Ø 0 g(q) Ø 0 and I Æ b 9. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 15 / 15

Appendix S 2 (q) Æ We want I Æ b 9 1 Ë 1 I Æ cosh(q fi 2 ) a +(b a) cosh where a = s t 0 0 dt 12 sin2 t 1. Introduce then I Æ cosh(q fi 2 ) + b 9. q fi 2 2 1 b cosh q fi 2È 6 1 10 2 1 g(q) =a + 9 b a cosh q fi 2 1 b cosh q fi 2 2 6 g(q) g(0) = b 9 > 0 g Õ (q) Ø 0 g(q) Ø 0 and I Æ b 9. Giulia Basti (La Sapienza) 3-body systems with interactions TQMS 2015 15 / 15