Lakewood High School

Transcription

1 Lakewood High School PO Box 70, Hebron, OH Grades Licking County IRN # School Year Rept Card Current Principal: Larry R. Bevard (740) Current Superintendent: Jay M. Gault (740) Your School s Designation: The School Rept Card f the school year shows the progress schools have made based on four measures of perfmance. Indicats Indicats AYP Adequate Yearly Progress Perfmance Index Perfmance Index Measure The combination of the four measures is the basis f assigning state designations to districts, buildings community schools. The six designations are Excellent with Distinction Excellent Continuous Improvement Indicats To meet a test indicat f grades , at least 75% of students tested must sce proficient higher on that test. Other indicat requirements are: 11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%. Number of Indicats out of Indicats 3rd Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement Perfmance Index (0-120 points) 97.1 Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade) Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade) Attendance Rate 25. All Grades Graduation Rate 26. School * Not School Improvement Measure Students enrolled in Title I schools in School Improvement may be eligible f Public School Choice Supplemental Educational Services. Contact your school f specific options available to your child. Percentage of Students at above the Proficient Level Your School Your District % 78.4 % 76.8 % 76.9 % 84.7 % 81 % 84.7 % 76.2 % 88.5 % 80.2 % 80.6 % 71.1 % 84.3 % 87.2 % 89.0 % 69.8 % 78.5 % The state requirement is 85 percent 91.9 % 92.2 % 91.6 % 91.3 % 90.8 % 89.2 % 93.3 % 92.8 % 93.2 % 89.3 % 88.9 % 85.1 % 89.3 % 89.5 % 88.7 % The state requirement is 93 percent 94.4 % 94.8 % 94.3 % The state requirement is 90 percent 98.7 % At Risk 72.4 % 70.6 % 73.5 % 81.0 % 75.9 % 83.4 % 79.0 % 70.7 % 85.1 % 86.2 % 88.4 % 70.2 % 79.0 % 98.8 % 71.8 % 67 % 69.9 % 84.1 % 77.4 % 80.9 % 69.2 % 64.8 % 83 % 80.4 % 84.1 % 73 % 79.6 % 83 % On the Web: reptcard.ohio.gov Any result at above the state stard is indicated by a. Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Cumulative results f students who took the tests as 10th 11th graders. *

2 2 Your School s Assessment Results Over Time All students in the school f a full academic year are included in the results. Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade) 75% 50% 25% 0% Stard - 75%100% Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade) * 75% 50% 25% 0% Stard - 85%100% Indicats The Indicats are based on state assessments, as well as on attendance graduation rates. To earn an indicat f Achievement Graduation Tests, at least 75% of students must reach proficient above f the given assessment. F the 11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests indicats, a cumulative 85% passage rate f each assessment is required. *Cumulative results f students who took the tests as 10th 11th graders.

3 Perfmance Index Perfmance Index Calculations f the School Year Perfmance Level Across Grades f all Tested Subjects (Includes every student enrolled in the school f a full academic year) Untested Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced Percentage Weight Points The Perfmance Index reflects the Perfmance Index achievement of every student enrolled f the fullacademic year. The Perfmance Index is a weighted average that includes all tested subjects grades untested students. The greatest weight is given to advanced sces (1.2); the weights decrease f each perfmance level a weight of zero is given to untested students. This results in a scale from 0 to 120 points. The Perfmance Index can be compared across years to show school achievement trends. Perfmance Index Over Time 3 Your School s Perfmance Index Measure Overall Composite Sces reflect grade level overall composite ratings f the school year. Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Note: results are computed only f buildings that include students in grades 4 through 8. Your school s rating represents the progress your school has made with its students since last school year. In contrast, achievement sces represent students perfmance at a point in time. A sce of Above indicates greater than one year of progress has been achieved; indicates one year of progress has been achieved; Below indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved. Measure results are computed only f buildings that include sufficient testing data f students in any grade 4 through 8. On the Web: reptcard.ohio.gov Above + Expected Growth - Legend Expected Growth Below Expected Growth

4 4 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Percent Proficient Adequate Yearly Progress Grades All Students Asian/Pacific Isler Economically Disadvantaged Not Black, non-hispanic Multi-Racial American Indian/Alaska Native Hispanic White, non-hispanic Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficient AYP Determination by Indicat Proficiency: Proficiency: Not Percent Tested Participation: Participation: Graduation Rate* Graduation Rate: Attendance Rate* N/A Attendance Rate: N/A AYP Determination by Subgroup Not AYP Determination f Your School: Not Legend This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this yearʼs AYP goals. F test indicats, AYP can be met in one of four ways: 1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results; 2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results; 3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harb; 4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results. F non-test indicats, AYP can be met in one of three ways: 1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results; 2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results; 3) making improvement over the previous year. The non-test indicats used f overall AYP (Attendance Rate Graduation Rate) * are evaluated only f the All Students subgroup. N/A Not Not applicable. Not Required This indicat was not evaluated f this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size f the proficiency non-test indicats, while 40 is the minimum size f the participation rate indicats. This subgroup met AYP f this indicat with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harb, growth measure results. This subgroup did not meet AYP f this indicat. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Every school district must meet AYP goals that are set f Proficiency Participation, Attendance Rate, Graduation Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students, AYP Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific Isler Students, Black, non-hispanic Students, American Indian/Alaska Native Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White, non-hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), Students with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet AYP in Proficiency, in Participation, Attendance Rate, Graduation Rate, then the school district does not meet AYP. Not meeting AYP f consecutive years will have both federal state consequences. Federal consequences could include a school district being identified f improvement. consequences could include a reduction in the state s rating designation Graduation Rate Infmation American Indian/ Asian Black, Econ. Alaska Native Pacific Isler non-hispanic Disadvtgd >95% Limited English Students with White, Hispanic Proficient Multi-Racial Disabilities non-hispanic 95% >95% The disaggregated graduation rates of your school are provided f infmational purposes only are not used f your AYP determination.

5 Federally Required School Infmation 5 Your School's Percentage of Students at Each Perfmance Level Black, non-hispanic American Indian/ Alaska Native Asian Pacific Isler Hispanic Percentage of Students Scing Limited Percentage of Students Scing Basic Multi- Racial Percentage of Students Scing Proficient Percentage of Students Scing Accelerated Percentage of Students Scing Advanced White, non-hispanic Non- Disabled Students Students with Disabilities Migrant Non- Econ. Disadvtgd Econ. Disadvtgd Limited English Proficient Female Male Average Daily Black, American Asian White, Student non- Indian Pacific Hispanic Multi-Racial non- Economically Limited Students with Migrant Enrollment Hispanic Alaska Native Isler Hispanic Disadvantaged English Proficient Disabilities % 39.3% 15.3% Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, states are required to rept certain data about schools teachers. Data presented here are f repting purposes only are not used in the computation of the state designation f districts schools. Your School s Students Your Building s Poverty Status*: Medium-Low Poverty Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachel s Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master s Degree Percentage of ce academic subject elementary secondary classes not taught by highly qualified teachers Percentage of ce academic subject elementary secondary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of ce academic subject elementary secondary classes taught by teachers with tempary, conditional long-term substitute certification/licensure Number of Limited English Proficient Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations Federally Required School Teacher Infmation Your Building District *High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

6 6 Determining Your School's Designation Determining your school s rept card designation is a multi-step process. The first step is to determine a preliminary designation, which is based on the following components: 1) the percentage of indicats met, 2) the perfmance index 3) AYP determination. Indicats Perfmance Index AYP Designation Preliminary Designation 94%-100% 100 to %-93.9% 0%-74.9% 50%-74.9% 90 to to to 89.9 Not Not Not Excellent Continuous Improvement 31%-49.9% 70 to 79.9 Not 0%-30.9% 0 to 69.9 Not The preliminary designation results from identifying the higher value between the percentage of indicats met by your school your school s perfmance index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminary designation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation. 1. If a school meets AYP in the current year, it can be rated no lower than Continuous Improvement. 2. If a school does not meet AYP f three consecutive years in the current year it does not meet AYP in me than one student group, it can be rated no higher than Continuous Improvement. 3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the preliminary designation. Once the preliminary designation is determined,, the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the school s final designation. 1. If your school s designation is restricted to Continuous Improvement due to AYP, has no impact on the designation the preliminary designation becomes the final designation. 2. If your school experiences above expected growth f at least two consecutive years, your school s final designation will increase by one designation. 3. If your school experiences below expected growth f at least three consecutive years, your school s final designation will decrease by one designation. Preliminary Designation Measure* Final Designation Excellent Continuous Improvement Above expected growth f at least 2 consecutive years Below expected growth f at least 3 consecutive years Above expected growth f at least 2 consecutive years Below expected growth f at least 3 consecutive years Above expected growth f at least 2 consecutive years Below expected growth f at least 3 consecutive years Above expected growth f at least 2 consecutive years Below expected growth f at least 3 consecutive years Above expected growth f at least 2 consecutive years Below expected growth f at least 3 consecutive years Excellent with Distinction Excellent Continuous Improvement Continuous Improvement *In all other cases, including if your school s designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then will have no impact on the designation the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

7 7 The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), often referred to as The Nation s Rept Card, is the only nationally representative continuing assessment that enables the comparision of perfmance in Ohio other states in various subject areas. Schools students within each state are selected romly to be a part of the assessment. Not all students in the state in a particular school take the assessment. Data are repted at the state level only, there are no individual student even school summary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography U.S. histy. To view Ohio s most recent NAEP results, go to: search f key wd NAEP