Central Middle School

Transcription

1 IRN# Your School s Designation: Excellent Central Middle School 301 Baldwin Ave, Findlay, OH Grades 6,8 Hancock County School Year Rept Card Current Principal: Donald Williams (419) Current Superintendent: Dean A. Wittwer (419) Number of Indicats out of 6 6 Perfmance Index (0-120 points) 98.6 Not Measure The School Rept Card f the school year shows the progress schools have made based on four measures of perfmance. Indicats Indicats AYP Adequate Yearly Progress Perfmance Index Perfmance Index Measure The combination of the four measures is the basis f assigning state designations to districts, buildings community schools. The six designations are Excellent with Distinction Excellent Effective Continuous Improvement Academic Emergency Indicats To meet a test indicat f grades , at least 75% of students tested must sce proficient higher on that test. Other indicat requirements are: 11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%. On the Web: reptcard.ohio.gov Indicats 3rd Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement th Grade Achievement Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade) Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade) * Attendance Rate 25. All Grades Four-Year Graduation Rate 26. School Percentage of at above the Level Your School Any result at above the state stard is indicated by a. Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Cumulative results f students who took the tests as 10th 11th graders. * Your District The state requirement is 85 percent % 79.0% 84.7% 79.8% 88.1% 83.3% 83.0% 78.4% 83.3% 76.8% 76.7% 67.5% 78.7% 72.5% 87.5% 86.2% 86.7% 80.9% 80.5% 79.9% 74.6% 79.5% 74.7% 73.6% 83.7% 83.7% 83.0% 87.6% 87.5% 79.6% 75.3% 75.2% 71.5% 90.4% 89.9% 87.6% 85.2% 83.7% 94.4% 95.1% 95.9% 92.3% 92.1% 86.0% 82.6% 87.1% 76.7% 81.6% 92.6% 89.9% 93.0% 85.6% 87.8% The state requirement is 93 percent 94.9% 95.5% 94.5% The state requirement is 90 percent 86.4% 79.7%

2 2 Your School s Assessment Results Over Time All students in the school f a full academic year are included in the results. Indicats The Indicats are based on state assessments, as well as on attendance graduation rates. To earn an indicat f Achievement Graduation Tests, at least 75% of students must reach proficient above f the given assessment. F the 11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests indicats, a cumulative 85% passage rate f each assessment is required.

3 Perfmance Index Perfmance Index Calculations f the School Year Perfmance Level Across Grades f All Tested Subjects (Includes every student enrolled in the school f a full academic year) Untested Limited Basic Accelerated Advanced Percentage Weight Points The Perfmance Index reflects the Perfmance Index achievement of every student enrolled f the full academic year. The Perfmance Index is a weighted average that includes all tested subjects grades untested students. The greatest weight is given to advanced sces (1.2); the weights decrease f each perfmance level a weight of zero is given to untested students. This results in a scale from 0 to 120 points. The Perfmance Index can be compared across years to show school achievement trends. Perfmance Index Over Time 3 Your School s Perfmance Index Measure Overall Composite Sces reflect grade level overall composite ratings f the school year. Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Note: results are computed only f buildings that include students in grades 4 through 8. Measure Your school s rating represents the progress your school has made with its students since last school year. In contrast, achievement sces represent students perfmance at a point in time. A sce of Above indicates greater than one year of progress has been achieved; indicates one year of progress has been achieved; Below indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved. results are computed only f buildings that include sufficient testing data f students in any grade 4 through 8. On the Web: reptcard.ohio.gov Legend Above Expected Growth Expected Growth Below Expected Growth

4 4 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Adequate Yearly Progress Grades Percent All Asian/Pacific Isler Economically Disadvantaged non- American Indian/ non- with Not Limited English AYP Determination by Indicat Proficiency: Proficiency: Not Percent Tested Participation: Participation: Graduation Rate N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Graduation Rate: N/A Attendance Rate* Attendance Rate: AYP Determination by Subgroup Not Legend This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year s AYP goals. F test indicats, AYP can be met in one of four ways: 1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results; 2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results; 3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harb; 4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results. AYP Determination f Your School: F the non-test attendance rate indicat, AYP can be met in one of three ways: 1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results; 2) meeting the AYP target with two-year combined results; 3) making improvement over the previous year. Attendance Rate is evaluated only f the All subgroup. * F the non-test graduation rate indicat, AYP can be met in one of two ways: 1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results; 2) making a 2 percentage point improvement over the previous year. Not N/A Not Not applicable. Not Required This indicat was not evaluated f this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size f the proficiency non-test indicats, while 40 is the minimum size f the participation rate indicats. This subgroup met AYP f this indicat with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harb, growth measure results. This subgroup did not meet AYP f this indicat. Class of 2011 Four-Year Graduation Rate Infmation Class of 2010 Five-Year Graduation Rate Infmation All American Indian/ Asian Pacific Isler non- All American Indian/ Asian Pacific Isler non- Limited English with non- Limited English with non-

5 Federally Required School Infmation 5 Your School s Percentage of at Each Perfmance Level non- American Indian/ Asian Pacific Isler Multi- Racial non- Non- Disabled with Migrant Non- Limited English Female Male Percentage of Scing Limited Percentage of Scing Basic Percentage of Scing Percentage of Scing Accelerated Percentage of Scing Advanced Your School s Average Daily Student Enrollment 812 non- American Indian Asian Pacific Isler non- Economically Disadvantaged Limited English with 2.5% 2.5% 6.2% 6.7% 82.0% 45.6% % 16.1% Migrant Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, states are required to rept certain data about schools teachers. Data presented here are f repting purposes only are not used in the computation of the state designation f districts schools. Your Building s Poverty Status*: Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachel s Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master s Degree Percentage of ce academic subject elementary secondary classes not taught by highly qualified teachers Percentage of ce academic subject elementary secondary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of ce academic subject elementary secondary classes taught by teachers with tempary, conditional long-term substitute certification/licensure Number of Limited English Excluded from Accountability Calculations School Teacher Infmation Medium-Low Poverty Your Building District 10% 98.2% 66.1% 62.1% % % 10% 99.9% % % *High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

6 6 Determining Your School s Designation Determining your school s rept card designation is a multi-step process. The first step is to determine a preliminary designation, which is based on the following components: 1) the percentage of indicats met, 2) the Perfmance Index 3) AYP determination. Indicats Perfmance Index AYP Designation Preliminary Designation 94%-100% 100 to 120 Not Excellent Effective 75%-93.9% 90 to 99.9 Not Effective Continuous Improvement 0%-74.9% 50%-74.9% 0 to to 89.9 Not Continuous Improvement 31%-49.9% 70 to 79.9 Not 0%-30.9% 0 to 69.9 Not Academic Emergency The preliminary designation results from identifying the higher value between the percentage of indicats met by your school your school s Perfmance Index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminary designation. There are two ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation. 1. If a school meets AYP in the current year, it can be rated no lower than Continuous Improvement. 2. If an Excellent Effective school does not meet AYP f the same two ( me) subgroups f three consecutive years, its rating will be decreased to Effective Continuous Improvement (respectively). Once the preliminary designation is determined,, the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the school s final designation. 1. If your school s designation either is increased decreased due to AYP, has no impact on the designation the preliminary designation becomes the final designation. 2. If your school experiences above expected growth in the current year, your school s final designation will increase by one designation. 3. If your school experiences below expected growth f at least two consecutive years, your school s final designation will decrease by one designation. Preliminary Designation Measure* Final Designation Above expected growth in the current year Excellent with Distinction Excellent Below expected growth f 2 consecutive years Effective Above expected growth in the current year Excellent Effective Below expected growth f 2 consecutive years Continuous Improvement Continuous Improvement Above expected growth in the current year Below expected growth f 2 consecutive years Effective Academic Emergency Above expected growth in the current year Continuous Improvement Below expected growth f 2 consecutive years Academic Emergency Above expected growth in the current year Below expected growth f 2 consecutive years Academic Emergency *In all other cases, will have no impact on the designation the preliminary designation will become the final designation.

7 7 The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), often referred to as The Nation s Rept Card, is the only nationally representative continuing assessment that enables the comparison of perfmance in Ohio other states in various subject areas. Schools students within each state are selected romly to be a part of the assessment. Not all students in the state in a particular school take the assessment. Data are repted at the state level only, there are no individual student even school summary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography U.S. histy. To view Ohio s most recent NAEP results, go to: search f key wd NAEP