Bounded gaps between primes


 Madeline Cain
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Boune gaps between primes Yitang Zhang It is prove that Abstract lim inf n p n+1 p n ) < , p n is the nth prime. Our metho is a refinement of the recent work of Golston, Pintz an Yilirim on the small gaps between consecutive primes. A major ingreient of the proof is a stronger version of the BombieriVinograov theorem that is applicable when the mouli are free from large prime ivisors only see Theorem 2 below), but it is aequate for our purpose. Contents 1. Introuction 2 2. Notation an sketch of the proof 3 3. Lemmas 7 4. Upper boun for S Lower boun for S Combinatorial arguments The ispersion metho Evaluation of S 3 r, a) Evaluation of S 2 r, a) A truncation of the sum of S 1 r, a) Estimation of R 1 r, a; k): The Type I case Estimation of R 1 r, a; k): The Type II case The Type III estimate: Initial steps The Type III estimate: Completion 48 References 55 1
2 1. Introuction Let p n enote the nth prime. It is conjecture that lim inf n p n+1 p n ) = 2. While a proof of this conjecture seems to be out of reach by present methos, recently Golston, Pintz an Yilirim [6] have mae significant progress towar the weaker conjecture lim inf p n+1 p n ) <. 1.1) n In particular, they prove that if the primes have level of istribution ϑ = 1/2 + ϖ for an arbitrarily small) ϖ > 0, then 1.1) will be vali see [6, Theorem 1]). Since the result ϑ = 1/2 is known the BombieriVinograov theorem), the gap between their result an 1.1) woul appear to be, as sai in [6], within a hair s breath. Until very recently, the best result on the small gaps between consecutive primes was ue to Golston, Pintz an Yilirim [7] that gives lim inf n p n+1 p n <. 1.2) log pn log log p n ) 2 One may ask whether the methos in [6], combine with the ieas in Bombieri, Frielaner an Iwaniec [1][3] which are employe to erive some stronger versions of the Bombieri Vinograov theorem, woul be goo enough for proving 1.1) see Question 1 on [6, p.822]). In this paper we give an affirmative answer to the above question. We aopt the following notation of [6]. Let H = {h 1, h 2,..., h k0 } 1.3) be a set compose of istinct nonnegative integers. We say that H is amissible if ν p H) < p for every prime p, ν p H) enotes the number of istinct resiue classes moulo p occupie by the h i. Theorem 1. Suppose that H is amissible with k Then there are infinitely many positive integers n such that the k 0 tuple contains at least two primes. Consequently, we have {n + h 1, n + h 2,..., n + h k0 } 1.4) lim inf n p n+1 p n ) < ) The boun 1.5) results from the fact that the set H is amissible if it is compose of k 0 istinct primes, each of which is greater than k 0, an the inequality π ) π ) >
3 This result is, of course, not optimal. The conition k is also crue an there are certain ways to relax it. To replace the right sie of 1.5) by a value as small as possible is an open problem that will not be iscusse in this paper. 2. Notation an sketch of the proof Notation p a prime number. a, b, c, h, k, l, m integers., n, q, r positive integers. Λq) the von Mangolt function. τ j q) the ivisor function, τ 2 q) = τq). ϕq) the Euler function. µq) the Möbius function. x a large number. L = log x. y, z real variables. ey) = exp{2πiy}. e q y) = ey/q). y the istance from y to the nearest integer. m aq) means m amo q). c/ means a/mo 1) ac 1mo ). q Q means Q q < 2Q. ε any sufficiently small, positive constant, not necessarily the same in each occurrence. B some positive constant, not necessarily the same in each occurrence. A any sufficiently large, positive constant, not necessarily the same in each occurrence. η = 1 + L 2A. κ N the characteristic function of [N, ηn) Z. a summation over reuce resiue classes lmo q). l mo q) C q a) the Ramanujan sum l mo q) e qla). We aopt the following conventions throughout our presentation. The set H given by 1.3) is assume to be amissible an fixe. We write ν p for ν p H); similar abbreviations will be use in the sequel. Every quantity epening on H alone is regare as a constant. For example, the absolutely convergent prouct S = p 1 ν ) p 1 1 ) k0 p p 3
4 is a constant. A statement is vali for any sufficiently small ε an for any sufficiently large A whenever they are involve. The meanings of sufficiently small an sufficiently large may vary from one line to the next. Constants implie in O or, unless specifie, will epen on H, ε an A at most. We first recall the unerlying iea in the proof of [6, Theorem 1] which consists in evaluating an comparing the sums S 1 = n x λn) 2 2.1) an S 2 = n x k0 λn) is a real function epening on H an x, an { log n if n is prime, θn) = 0 otherwise. The key point is to prove, with an appropriate choice of λ, that i=1 ) θn + h i ) λn) 2, 2.2) S 2 log 3x)S 1 > ) This implies, for sufficiently large x, that there is a n x such that the tuple 1.4) contains at least two primes. In [6] the function λn) mainly takes the form λn) = D is a power of x an Let an 1 k 0 + l 0 )! P n) D µ) log D ) k0 +l 0, l 0 > 0, 2.4) k 0 P n) = n + h j ). j=1 γ;, c) = γn) 1 n x ϕ) n c) n x n,)=1 γn) for, c) = 1, C i ) = {c : 1 c, c, ) = 1, P c h i ) 0mo )} for 1 i k 0. 4
5 The evaluations of S 1 an S 2 lea to a relation of the form S 2 log 3x)S 1 = k 0 T 2 LT 1 )x + OxL k 0+2l 0 ) + OE) for D < x 1/2 ε, T1 an T2 are certain arithmetic sums see Lemma 1 below), an E = µ) τ 3 )τ k0 1) θ;, c). <D 2 c C i ) 1 i k 0 Let ϖ > 0 be a small constant. If D = x 1/4+ϖ 2.5) an k 0 is sufficiently large in terms of ϖ, then, with an appropriate choice of l 0, one can prove that k 0 T2 LT1 L k 0+2l ) In this situation the error E can be efficiently boune if the primes have level of istribution ϑ > 1/2 + 2ϖ, but one is unable to prove it by present methos. On the other han, for D = x 1/4 ε, the BombieriVinograov theorem is goo enough for bouning E, but the relation 2.6) can not be vali, even if a more general form of λn) is consiere see Sounararajan [12]). Our first observation is that, in the sums T1 an T2, the contributions from the terms with having a large prime ivisor are relatively small. Thus, if we impose the constraint P in 2.4), P is the prouct of the primes less than a small power of x, the resulting main term is still L k 0+2l 0 +1 with D given by 2.5). Our secon observation, which is the most novel part of the proof, is that with D given by 2.5) an with the constraint P impose in 2.4), the resulting error τ 3 )τ k0 1) θ;, c) 2.7) 1 i k 0 <D 2 P c C i ) can be efficiently boune. This is originally ue to the simple fact that if P an is not too small, say > x 1/2 ε, then can be factore as = rq 2.8) with the range for r flexibly chosen see Lemma 4 below). Thus, roughly speaking, the characteristic function of the set { : x 1/2 ε < < D 2, P} may be treate as a well factorable function see Iwaniec [10]). The factorization 2.8) is crucial for bouning the error terms. It suffices to prove Theorem 1 with k 0 =
6 which is henceforth assume. Let D be as in 2.5) with Let gy) be given by gy) = ϖ = log D ) k0 +l 0 if y < D, k 0 + l 0 )! y an Write gy) = 0 if y D, D 1 = x ϖ, l 0 = 180. D 0 = exp{l 1/k 0 }, P = p, 2.9) p<d 1 P 0 = p. 2.10) p D 0 In the case P an is not too small, the factor q in 2.8) may be chosen such that q, P 0 ) = 1. This will consierably simplify the argument. We choose λn) = µ)g). 2.11) P n),p) In the proof of Theorem 1, the main terms are not ifficult to hanle, since we eal with a fixe H. This is quite ifferent from [6] an [7], in which various sets H are involve in the argument to erive results like 1.2). By Cauchy s inequality, the error 2.7) is efficiently boune via the following Theorem 2. For 1 i k 0 we have θ;, c) xl A. 2.12) <D 2 P c C i ) The proof of Theorem 2 is escribe as follows. First, applying combinatorial arguments see Lemma 6 below), we reuce the proof to estimating the sum of γ;, c) with certain Dirichlet convolutions γ. There are three types of the convolutions involve in the argument. Write x 1 = x 3/8+8ϖ, x 2 = x 1/2 4ϖ. 2.13) In the first two types the function γ is of the form γ = α β such that the following hol. A 1 ) α = αm)) is supporte on [M, η j 1 M), j 1 19, αm) τ j1 m)l. 6
7 A 2 ) β = βn)) is supporte on [N, η j 2 N), j 2 19, βn) τ j2 n)l, x 1 < N < 2x 1/2. For any q, r an a satisfying a, r) = 1, the following SiegelWalfisz assumption is satisfie. n ar) n,q)=1 βn) 1 ϕr) n,qr)=1 A 3 ) j 1 + j 2 20, [MN, η 20 MN) [x, 2x). βn) τ 20 q)nl 200A. We say that γ is of Type I if x 1 < N x 2 ; we say that γ is of Type II if x 2 < N < 2x 1/2. In the Type I an II estimates we combine the ispersion metho in [1] with the factorization 2.8) here r is close to N in the logarithmic scale). Due to the fact that the moulo is at most slightly greater than x 1/2 in the logarithmic scale, after reucing the problem to estimating certain incomplete Kloosterman sums, we nee only to save a small power of x from the trivial estimates; a variant of Weil s boun for Kloosterman sums see Lemma 11 below) will fulfill it. Here the conition N > x 1, which may be slightly relaxe, is essential. We say that γ is of Type III if it is of the form γ = α κ N1 κ N2 κ N3 such that α satisfies A 1 ) with j 1 17, an such that the following hol. A 4 ) N 3 N 2 N 1, MN 1 x 1. A 5 ) [MN 1 N 2 N 3, η 20 MN 1 N 2 N 3 ) [x, 2x). The Type III estimate essentially relies on the BirchBombieri result in the appenix to [5] see Lemma 12 below), which is employe by Frielaner an Iwaniec [5] an by HeathBrown [9] to stuy the istribution of τ 3 n) in arithmetic progressions. This result in turn relies on Deligne s proof of the Riemann Hypothesis for varieties over finite fiels the Weil Conjecture) [4]. We estimate each γ;, c) irectly. However, if one applies the metho in [5] alone, efficient estimates will be vali only for MN 1 x 3/8 5ϖ/2 ε. Our argument is carrie out by combining the metho in [5] with the factorization 2.8) here r is relatively small); the latter will allow us to save a factor r 1/2. In our presentation, all the αm) an βn) are real numbers. 3. Lemmas In this section we introuce a number of prerequisite results, some of which are quote from the literature irectly. Results given here may not be in the strongest forms, but they are aequate for the proofs of Theorem 1 an Theorem 2. Lemma 1. Let ϱ 1 ) an ϱ 2 ) be the multiplicative functions supporte on squarefree integers such that ϱ 1 p) = ν p, ϱ 2 p) = ν p 1. 7
8 Let an We have an T 2 = T 1 = 0 1 T 2 = 0 T 1 = 1 µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ) k 0 + 2l 0 )! 1 k 0 + 2l 0 + 1)! µ 1 2 )ϱ ) ϕ ) 2 2l0 l 0 g 0 1 )g 0 2 ). ) Slog D) k 0+2l 0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ) 3.1) ) 2l0 + 2 Slog D) k 0+2l ol k 0+2l 0 +1 ). 3.2) l Proof. The sum T 1 is the same as the sum T R l 1, l 2 ; H 1, H 2 ) in [6, 7.6)] with H 1 = H 2 = H k 1 = k 2 = k 0 ), l 1 = l 2 = l 0, R = D, so 3.1) follows from [6, Lemma 3]; the sum T 2 is the same as the sum T R l 1, l 2 ; H 1, H 2, h 0 ) in [6, 9.12)] with H 1 = H 2 = H, l 1 = l 2 = l 0, h 0 H, R = D, so 3.2) also follows from [6, Lemma 3]. an Remark. A generalization of this lemma can be foun in [12]. Lemma 2. Let A 1 ) = r,)=1 A 2 ) = r,)=1 µr)ϱ 1 r) gr) r µr)ϱ 2 r) gr). ϕr) Suppose that < D an µ) = 1. Then we have A 1 ) = ϑ 1) S log D ) l0 + OL l0 1+ε ) 3.3) l 0! an A 2 ) = ϑ 2) l 0 + 1)! S log D ) l OL l0+ε ), 3.4) ϑ 1 ) an ϑ 2 ) are the multiplicative functions supporte on squarefree integers such that ϑ 1 p) = 1 ν ) 1 p, ϑ 2 p) = 1 ν ) 1 p 1. p p 1 8
9 Proof. Recall that D 0 is given by 2.10). Since ϱ 1 r) τ k0 r), we have trivially A 1 ) 1 + logd/) ) 2k 0 +l 0, so we may assume D/ > exp{log D 0 ) 2 } without loss of generality. Write s = σ + it. For σ > 0 we have µr)ϱ 1 r) = ϑ r 1+s 1, s)g 1 s)ζ1 + s) k 0 ϑ 1, s) = p It follows that r,)=1 1 ν p p 1+s ) 1, G 1 s) = A 1 ) = 1 2πi 1/L) p 1 ν ) p 1 1 ) k0. p 1+s p 1+s ϑ 1, s)g 1 s) D/) s s ζ1 + s) k 0 s. k 0+l 0 +1 Note that G 1 s) is analytic an boune for σ 1/3. We split the line of integration into two parts accoring to t D 0 an t > D 0. By a wellknown result on the zerofree region for ζs), we can move the line segment {σ = 1/L, t D 0 } to { σ = κlog D0 ) 1, t D 0 }, κ > 0 is a certain constant, an apply some stanar estimates to euce that A 1 ) = 1 ϑ 1, s)g 1 s) D/) s s 2πi ζ1 + s) k 0 s k 0+l 0 + OL A ). +1 Note that ϑ 1, 0) = ϑ 1 ) an s =1/L ϑ 1, s) ϑ 1 ) = ϑ 1, s)ϑ 1 ) l µl)ϱ 1 l) 1 l s ). l If s 1/L, then ϑ 1, s) log L) B, so that, by trivial estimation, ϑ 1, s) ϑ 1 ) L ε 1. On the other han, by Cauchy s integral formula, for s 1/L we have It follows that 1 2πi s =1/L G 1 s) S 1/L. ϑ 1, s)g 1 s) D/) s s ζ1 + s) k 0 s k 0+l πi ϑ D/) s s 1)S L l0 1+ε. s =1/L s l 0+1 9
10 This leas to 3.3). The proof of 3.4) is analogous. We have only to note that A 2 ) = 1 ϑ 2, s)g 2 s) D/) s s 2πi ζ1 + s) k 0 1 s k 0+l 0 +1 with ϑ 2, s) = p an G 2 0) = S. an 1 ν p 1 p 1)p s Lemma 3. We have ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) <x 1/4 Proof. ϱ 2 )ϑ 2 ) ϕ) <x 1/4 1/L) ) 1, G 2 s) = p 1 ν ) p ) 1 k0, p 1)p s p 1+s = 1 + 4ϖ) k 0 S 1 log D) k 0 + OL k0 1 ) 3.5) k 0! = 1 + 4ϖ)1 k 0 S 1 log D) k0 1 + OL k0 2 ), 3.6) k 0 1)! Noting that ϑ 1 p)/p = 1/p ν p ), for σ > 0 we have =1 B 1 s) = p Hence, by Perron s formula, ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) <x 1/4 = 1 2πi ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) 1+s = B 1 s)ζ1 + s) k 0, ) ν p ) k0. p ν p )p s p 1+s 1/L+iD0 B 1 s)ζ1 + s) k0 x s/4 1/L id 0 s s + OD 1 0 L B ). Note that B 1 s) is analytic an boune for σ 1/3. Moving the path of integration to [ 1/3 id 0, 1/3 + id 0 ], we see that the right sie above is equal to 1 B 1 s)ζ1 + s) k 0 x s/4 s + OD0 1 L B ). 2πi s s =1/L Since, by Cauchy s integral formula, B 1 s) B 1 0) 1/L for s = 1/L, an B 1 0) = ) p 1 1 k0 = S p ν p p p) 1, 10
11 it follows that ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) <x 1/4 = 1 L k 0! S 1 4 ) k0 + OL k 0 1 ). This leas to 3.5) since L/4 = 1 + 4ϖ) 1 log D by 2.5). The proof of 3.6) is analogous. We have only to note that, for σ > 0, =1 ϱ 2 )ϑ 2 ) ϕ)p s = B 2 s)ζ1 + s) k 0 1 with B 2 s) = p 1 + ν ) p ) k0 1, p ν p )p s p 1+s an B 2 0) = S 1. Recall that D 1 an P are given by 2.9), an P 0 is given by 2.10). Lemma 4. Suppose that > D 2 1, P an, P 0 ) < D 1. For any R satisfying D 2 1 < R <, 3.7) there is a factorization = rq such that D 1 1 R < r < R an q, P 0 ) = 1. Proof. Since is squarefree an /, P 0 ) > D 1, we may write /, P 0 ) as n, P 0 ) = p j with D 0 < p 1 < p 2 <... < p n < D 1, n 2. j=1 By 3.7), there is a n < n such that n n +1, P 0 ) p j < R an, P 0 ) p j R. j=1 The assertion follows by choosing an noting that r 1/p n +1)R. n r =, P 0 ) p j, q = j=1 j=1 n j=n +1 Lemma 5. Suppose that 1 i k 0 an µqr) = 1. There is a bijection p j, C i qr) C i r) C i q), c a, b) 11
12 such that cmo qr) is a common solution to c amo r) an c bmo q). Proof. By the Chinese remainer theorem. The next lemma is a special case of the combinatorial ientity ue to HeathBrown[8]. Lemma 6 Suppose that x 1/10 x < ηx 1/10. For n < 2x we have 10 ) 10 Λn) = 1) j 1 µm 1 )...µm j ) j j=1 m 1,...,m j x The next lemma is a truncate Poisson formula. n 1...n j m 1...m j =n log n 1. Lemma 7 Suppose that η η η 19 an x 1/4 < M < x 2/3. Let f be a function of C, ) class such that 0 fy) 1, an fy) = 1 if M y η M, fy) = 0 if y / [1 M ε )M, 1 + M ε )η M], f j) y) M j1 ε), j 1, the implie constant epening on ε an j at most. Then we have fm) = 1 ˆfh/)e ah) + Ox 2 ) m a) h <H for any H M 1+2ε, ˆf is the Fourier transform of f, i.e., ˆfz) = fy)eyz) y. Lemma 8. Suppose that 1 N < N < 2x, N N > x ε an c, ) = 1. Then for j, ν 1 we have N n N n c) τ j n) ν N N ϕ) Ljν 1, the implie constant epening on ε, j an ν at most. Proof. See [11, Theorem 1]. The next lemma is essentially) containe in the proof of [5, Theorem 4]. Lemma 9 Suppose that H, N 2, > H an c, ) = 1. Then we have min { H, c n/ 1} N) ε H + N). 3.8) n N n,)=1 12
13 Proof. We may assume N H without loss of generality. Write {y} = y [y] an assume ξ [1/H, 1/2]. Note that {c n/} ξ if an only if bn cmo ) for some b 0, ξ], an 1 ξ {c n/} if an only if bn cmo ) for some b 0, ξ], Thus, the number of the n satisfying n N, n, ) = 1 an c n/ ξ is boune by τq) ε N 1+ε ξ. q Nξ q ±c) Hence, for any interval I of the form I = 0, 1/H], I = [1 1/H, 1), I = [ξ, ξ ] or I = [1 ξ, 1 ξ] with 1/H ξ < ξ 1/2, ξ 2ξ, the contribution from the terms on the left sie of 3.8) with {c n/} I is ε N 1+ε. This completes the proof. Lemma 10. Suppose that β = βn)) satisfies A 2 ) an R x ε N. Then for any q we have ϱ 2 r) βn) 1 2 βn) ϕr) τq) B N 2 L 100A. r R l mo r) n lr) n,q)=1 n,qr)=1 Proof. Since the inner sum is ϕr) 1 N 2 L B by Lemma 8, the assertion follows by Cauchy s inequality an [1, Theorem 0]. Lemma 11 Suppose that N 1, 1 2 > 10 an µ 1 ) = µ 2 ) = 1. Then we have, for any c 1, c 2 an l, n N n, 1 )=1 n+l, 2 )=1 c1 n e + c ) 2n + l) 1 2 ) 1/2+ε + c 1, 1 )c 2, 2 ) 1, 2 ) 2 N. 3.9) Proof. Write 0 = 1, 2 ), t 1 = 1 / 0, t 2 = 2 / 0 an = 0 t 1 t 2. Let K 1, c 1 ; 2, c 2 ; l, m) = n n, 1 )=1 n+l, 2 )=1 c1 n e + c 2n + l) + mn ). 1 2 We claim that K 1, c 1 ; 2, c 2 ; l, m) 0 Sm, b 1 ; t 1 )Sm, b 2 ; t 2 ) 3.10) for some b 1 an b 2 satisfying b i, t i ) c i, i ), 3.11) 13
14 Sm, b; t) enotes the orinary Kloosterman sum. Note that 0, t 1 an t 2 are pairwise coprime. Assume that an n t 1 t 2 n t 2 n t 1 n 2 mo ) l t 1 t 2 l t 1 l 2 mo 2 ). The conitions n, 1 ) = 1 an n + l, 2 ) = 1 are equivalent to n 0, 0 ) = n 1, t 1 ) = 1 an n 0 + l 0, 0 ) = n 2 + l 2, t 2 ) = 1 respectively. Letting a i mo 0 ), b i mo t i ), i = 1, 2 be given by so that 3.11) hols, by the relation a 1 t 2 1t 2 c 1 mo 0 ), a 2 t 1 t 2 2 c 2 mo 0 ), b 1 2 0t 2 c 1 mo t 1 ), b 2 2 0t 1 c 2 mo t 2 ), we have Hence, 1 i t i t i mo 1) c 1 n 1 + c 2n + l) 2 a 1 n 0 + a 2 n 0 + l 0 ) 0 + b 1 n 1 t 1 + b 2n 2 + l 2 ) t 2 mo 1). c 1 n + c 2n + l) + mn 1 2 a 1 n 0 + a 2 n 0 + l 0 ) + mn b 1 n 1 + mn 1 t 1 + b 2n 2 + l 2 ) + mn 2 + l 2 ) t 2 ml 2 t 2 mo 1). From this we euce, by the Chinese remainer theorem, that K 1, c 1 ; 2, c 2 ; l, m) = e t2 ml 2 )Sm, b 1 ; t 1 )Sm, b 2 ; t 2 ) k n<k+ n, 1 =1 n+l, 2 )=1 n 0 n, 0 )=1 n+l 0, 0 )=1 whence 3.10) follows. By 3.10) with m = 0 an 3.11), for any k > 0 we have c1 n e + c ) 2n + l) c 1, 1 )c 2, 2 ) e 0 a1 n + a 2 n + l 0 ) + mn ),
15 It now suffices to prove 3.9) on assuming N 1. By stanar Fourier techniques, the left sie of 3.9) may be rewritten as um)k 1, c 1 ; 2, c 2 ; l, m) with <m< { N um) min, 1 m, }. 3.12) m 2 By 3.10) an Weil s boun for Kloosterman sums, we fin that the left sie of 3.9) is 0 u0) b 1, t 1 )b 2, t 2 ) + t 1 t 2 ) 1/2+ε um) m, b 1, t 1 ) 1/2 m, b 2, t 2 ) ). 1/2 m 0 This leas to 3.9) by 3.12) an 3.11). Remark. In the case 2 = 1, 3.9) becomes n N n, 1 )=1 e 1 c 1 n) 1/2+ε 1 + c 1, 1 )N ) This estimate is wellknown see [2, Lemma 6], for example), an it will fin application some. Lemma 12. Let T k; m 1, m 2 ; q) = l mo q) t 1 mo q) t 2 mo q) e q lt1 l + k)t 2 + m 1 t 1 m 2 t 2 ), is restriction to ll + k), q) = 1. Suppose that q is squarefree. Then we have T k; m 1, m 2 ; q) k, q) 1/2 q 3/2+ε. Proof. By [5, 1.26)], it suffices to show that T k; m 1, m 2 ; p) k, p) 1/2 p 3/2. In the case k 0mo p), this follows from the BirchBombieri result in the appenix to [5] the proof is straightforwar if m 1 m 2 0mo p)); in the case k 0mo p), this follows from Weil s boun for Kloosterman sums. 15
16 4. Upper boun for S 1 Recall that S 1 is given by 2.1) an λn) is given by 2.11). The aim of this section is to establish an upper boun for S 1 see 4.20) below). Changing the orer of summation we obtain S 1 = µ 1 )g 1 )µ 2 )g 2 ) 1. 1 P 2 P n x P n) 0[ 1, 2 ]) By the Chinese remainer theorem, for any squarefree, there are exactly ϱ 1 ) istinct resiue classes mo ) such that P n) 0mo ) if an only if n lies in one of these classes, so the innermost sum above is equal to It follows that T 1 = 1 P ϱ 1 [ 1, 2 ]) x + Oϱ 1 [ 1, 2 ])). [ 1, 2 ] 2 P S 1 = T 1 x + OD 2+ε ), 4.1) µ 1 )g 1 )µ 2 )g 2 ) ϱ 1 [ 1, 2 ]). [ 1, 2 ] Note that ϱ 1 ) is supporte on squarefree integers. Substituting 0 = 1, 2 ) an rewriting 1 an 2 for 1 / 0 an 2 / 0 respectively, we euce that T 1 = 0 P 1 P 2 P We nee to estimate the ifference T 1 T 1. We have Σ 1 = Σ 31 = 0 x 1/4 x 1/4 < 0 <D 1 µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ). 4.2) T 1 = Σ 1 + Σ 31, µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ), µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ) In the case 0 > x 1/4, 0 1 < D, 0 2 < D an µ 1 2 ) = 1, the conitions i P, i = 1, 2 are reunant. Hence, T 1 = Σ 2 + Σ 32, 16
17 It follows that Σ 2 = Σ 32 = Σ 3 = 0 x 1/4 0 P x 1/4 < 0 <D 0 P x 1/4 < 0 <D 0 P 1, 0 )=1 2, 0 )=1 1 P 2 P 1 µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ), µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ) T 1 T 1 Σ 1 + Σ 2 + Σ 3, 4.3) 1 µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ) First we estimate Σ 1. By Möbius inversion, the inner sum over 1 an 2 in Σ 1 is equal to ϱ 1 0 ) µ 1 )ϱ 1 1 )µ 2 )ϱ 1 2 ) ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ) µq) It follows that = ϱ 1 0 ) 0 q, 0 )=1 Σ 1 = µq)ϱ 1 q) 2 0 x 1/4 q, 0 )=1 q 2 A 1 0 q) 2. ϱ 1 0 )µq)ϱ 1 q) 2 q 1, 2 ) 0 q 2 A 1 0 q) ) The contribution from the terms with q D 0 above is D 1 0 L B. Thus, substituting 0 q =, we euce that Σ 1 = ϱ 1 )ϑ ) A 1 ) 2 + OD0 1 L B ), 4.5) <x 1/4 D 0 By the simple bouns which follows from 3.3), ϑ ) = 0 q= 0 <x 1/4 q<d 0 µq)ϱ 1 q). q A 1 ) L l 0 log L) B 4.6) ϑ ) log L) B 17
18 an ϱ 1 ) L k 0+1/k 0 1, 4.7) x 1/4 <x 1/4 D 0 the contribution from the terms on the right sie of 4.5) with x 1/4 < x 1/4 D 0 is ol k 0+2l 0 ). On the other han, assuming µ) = 1 an noting that for < x 1/4 we have q µq)ϱ 1 q) q so that, by 3.3), ϑ )A 1 ) 2 = 1 l 0!) 2 S2 ϑ 1 ) log D Inserting this into 4.5) we obtain Σ 1 = 1 l 0!) 2 S2 Together with 3.5), this yiels Σ 1 ϑ ) = ϑ 1 ) 1 + O ) τ k0 +1)D0 1, ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) x 1/4 = ϑ 1 ) 1, 4.8) ) 2l0 + O τ k0+1)d 1 0 L B) + OL 2l 0 1+ε ). log D ) 2l0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ). 4.9) δ 1 k 0!l 0!) 2 Slog D)k 0+2l 0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ), 4.10) δ 1 = 1 + 4ϖ) k 0. Next we estimate Σ 2. Similar to 4.4), we have Σ 2 = 0 x 1/4 0 P q, 0 )=1 q P A 1) = r,)=1 r P ϱ 1 0 )µq)ϱ 1 q) 2 A 0 q q) 2. µr)ϱ 1 r)gr). r In a way similar to the proof of 4.5), we euce that Σ 2 = <x 1/4 D 0 P ϱ 1 )ϑ ) A 1) 2 + OD0 1 L B ). 4.11) 18
19 Assume P. By Möbius inversion we have Noting that A 1) = by 3.3) we euce that r,)=1 µr)ϱ 1 r)gr) r P = q r,p ) D 1 p<d µq) = ϱ 1 q) A 1 q), q q P p. ϑ 1 q) = 1 + OD 1 1 ) if q P an q < D, 4.12) A 1) 1 l 0! Sϑ 1) log D ) l0 ϱ 1 q) + OL l0 1+ε ). 4.13) q q P q<d If q P an q < D, then q has at most 292 prime factors. In aition, by the prime number theorem we have It follows that D 1 p<d 1 p = log OL A ). 4.14) q P q<d ϱ 1 q) q ν=1 log 293)k 0 ) ν ν! + OL A ) = δ 2 + OL A ), say. Inserting this into 4.13) we obtain A 1) δ 2 l 0! Sϑ 1) log D ) l0 + OL l0 1+ε ). Combining this with 4.11), in a way similar to the proof of 4.9) we euce that Σ 2 δ2 2 l 0!) 2 S2 Together with 3.5), this yiels ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) <x 1/4 log D ) 2l0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ). Σ 2 δ 1δ 2 2 k 0!l 0!) 2 Slog D)k 0+2l 0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ). 4.15) 19
20 We now turn to Σ 3. In a way similar to the proof of 4.5), we euce that Σ 3 = x 1/4 <<D ϑ) = 0 q= x 1/4 < 0 0 P ϱ 1 ) ϑ) A 1 ) 2, 4.16) µq)ϱ 1 q). q By 4.6) an 4.7), we fin that the contribution from the terms with x 1/4 < x 1/4 D 0 in 4.16) is ol k 0+2l 0 ). Now assume that x 1/4 D 0 < < D, µ) = 1 an P. Noting that the conitions 0 an x 1/4 < 0 together imply 0 P, by 4.8) we obtain ϑ) = 0 q= x 1/4 < 0 µq)ϱ 1 q) q Together with 3.3), this yiels ϑ)a 1 ) 2 = 1 l 0!) 2 S2 ϑ 1 ) log D Combining these results with 4.16) we obtain Σ 3 = 1 l 0!) 2 S2 x 1/4 D 0 <<D P By 4.12), 4.14) an 3.5) we have x 1/4 <<D P ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) Together with 4.17), this yiels <D = ϑ 1 ) 1 + O ) τ k0 +1)D0 1. ) 2l0 + O τ k0+1)d 1 0 L B) + OL 2l 0 1+ε ). ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) D 1 p<d ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) log D ) 2l0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ). 4.17) ϱ 1 p)ϑ 1 p) p p,p ) 1 <D/p ϱ 1 )ϑ 1 ) log 293)δ 1 k 0 1)! S 1 log D) k 0 + ol k 0 ) Σ 3 log 293)δ 1 k 0 1)!l 0!) 2 Slog D)k 0+2l 0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ). 4.18) 20
21 Since 1 k 0!l 0!) = 1 k0 + 2l 0 2 k 0 + 2l 0 )! it follows from 4.3), 4.10), 4.15) an 4.18) that T 1 T1 2l0 κ 1 k 0 + 2l 0 )! l 0 k 0 ) 2l0 l 0 ), ) Slog D) k 0+2l 0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ), 4.19) ) κ 1 = δ δ2 2 k0 + 2l 0 + log 293)k 0 ). Together with 3.1), this implies that T κ ) 1 2l0 Slog D) k 0+2l 0 + ol k 0+2l 0 ). k 0 + 2l 0 )! l 0 Combining this with 4.1), we euce that S κ ) 1 2l0 Sxlog D) k 0+2l 0 + oxl k 0+2l 0 ). 4.20) k 0 + 2l 0 )! l 0 We conclue this section by giving an upper boun for κ 1. By the inequality an simple computation we have n! > 2πn) 1/2 n n e n ) log 1 + δ )k0 ) log 293)k 0 < 2 < 1 292! 292π )584 k 0 an k0 + 2l 0 It follows that This gives k 0 ) < 2k2l 0 0 2l 0 )! < 1 180π 26500) 360. log κ 1 < log log185100) log26500) < κ 1 < exp{ 1200}. 4.21) 21
22 5. Lower boun for S 2 Recall that S 2 is given by 2.2). The aim of this section is to establish a lower boun for S 2 on assuming Theorem 2 see 5.6) below), which together with 4.20) leas to 2.3). We have S 2 = θn)λn h i ) 2 + Ox ε ). 5.1) 1 i k 0 n x Assume that 1 i k 0. Changing the orer of summation we obtain µ 1 )g 1 )µ 2 )g 2 ) n x θn)λn h i ) 2 = 1 P 2 P n x P n h i ) 0[ 1, 2 ]) θn). Now assume µ) = 1. To hanle the innermost sum we first note that the conition P n h i ) 0 mo ) an n, ) = 1 is equivalent to n cmo ) for some c C i ). Further, for any p, the quantity C i p) is equal to the number of istinct resiue classes mo p) occupie by the h i h j with h j h i mo p), so C i p) = ν p 1. This implies C i ) = ϱ 2 ) by Lemma 5. Thus the innermost sum above is equal to c C i [ 1, 2 ]) n x n c[ 1, 2 ]) θn) = ϱ 2[ 1, 2 ]) ϕ[ 1, 2 ]) θn) + n x c C i [ 1, 2 ]) θ; [ 1, 2 ], c). Since the number of the pairs { 1, 2 } such that [ 1, 2 ] = is equal to τ 3 ), it follows that θn)λn h i ) 2 = T 2 θn) + OE i ), 5.2) n x T 2 = 1 P which is inepenent of i, an 2 P E i = <D 2 P n x µ 1 )g 1 )µ 2 )g 2 ) ϱ 2 [ 1, 2 ]) ϕ[ 1, 2 ]) τ 3 )ϱ 2 ) By Cauchy s inequality an Theorem 2 we have c C i ) θ;, c). E i xl A. 5.3) 22
23 It follows from 5.1)5.3) an the prime number theorem that Similar to 4.2), we may rewrite T 2 as T 2 = 0 P 1 P S 2 = k 0 T 2 x + OxL A ). 5.4) 2 P µ 1 2 )ϱ ) g 0 1 )g 0 2 ). ϕ ) In a way much similar to the proof of 4.19), from the secon assertions of Lemma 2 an Lemma 3 we euce that ) T 2 T2 κ 2 2l0 + 2 < Slog D) k 0+2l ol k 0+2l 0 +1 ), 5.5) k 0 + 2l 0 + 1)! l ) κ 2 = δ ϖ)1 + δ2 2 k0 + 2l log 293)k 0 ). k 0 1 Together with 3.2), this implies that T 2 1 κ 2 k 0 + 2l 0 + 1)! 2l0 + 2 l ) Slog D) k 0+2l ol k 0+2l 0 +1 ). Combining this with 5.4), we euce that S 2 k ) 01 κ 2 ) 2l0 + 2 Sxlog D) k 0+2l oxl k 0+2l 0 +1 ). 5.6) k 0 + 2l 0 + 1)! l We are now in a position to prove Theorem 1 on assuming Theorem 2. By 4.20), 5.6) an the relation 4 L = log D, 1 + 4ϖ we have S 2 log 3x)S 1 ωsxlog D) k 0+2l oxl k 0+2l 0 +1 ), 5.7) ω = k 01 κ 2 ) k 0 + 2l 0 + 1)! which may be rewritten as 1 2l0 ω = k 0 + 2l 0 )! Note that l 0 ) 2l0 + 2 l ) 22l0 + 1) l κ 2 = k 0k 0 + 2l 0 + 1)1 + 4ϖ) κ 1 2l 0 + 1)2l 0 + 2) κ 1 ) 1 + 4ϖ)k 0 + 2l 0 )! 2l0 l 0 ), k 0 1 κ 2 ) k 0 + 2l κ ) 1) ϖ < 10 8.
24 Thus, by 4.21), both of the constants κ 1 an κ 2 are extremely small. It follows by simple computation that ω > ) Finally, from 5.7) an 5.8) we euce 2.3), whence Theorem 1 follows. Remark. The bouns 4.19) an 5.5) are crue an there may be some ways to improve them consierably. It is even possible to evaluate T 1 an T 2 irectly. Thus one might be able to show that 2.3) hols with a consierably smaller k Combinatorial arguments The rest of this paper is evote to proving Theorem 2. sections we assume that 1 i k 0. Write In this an the next six D 2 = x 1/2 ε. On the left sie of 2.12), the contribution from the terms with D 2 is xl A by the BombieriVinograov Theorem. Recalling that D 1 an P 0 are given by 2.9) an 2.10) respectively, by trivial estimation, for D 2 < < D 2 we may also impose the constraint, P 0 ) < D 1, an replace θn) by Λn). Thus Theorem 2 follows from the following Λ;, c) xl A. 6.1) D 2 <<D 2 P,P 0 )<D 1 c C i ) The aim of this section is to reuce the proof of 6.1) to showing that γ;, c) xl 41A 6.2) D 2 <<D 2 P,P 0 )<D 1 c C i ) for γ being of Type I, II or III. Let L be given by Ln) = log n. By Lemma 6, for n x we have Λn) = Λ 1 n) 10 ) 10 Λ 1 = 1) j 1 µκ Mj )... µκ M1 ) κ Nj )... Lκ N1 ). j j=1 M j,...,m 1,N j,...,n 1 Here M j,..., M 1, N j,..., N 1 1 run over the powers of η satisfying M t x 1/10, 6.3) [M j...m 1 N j...n 1, η 20 M j...m 1 N j...n 1 ) [x, 2x) φ. 6.4) 24
25 Let Λ 2 have the same expression as Λ 1 but with the constraint 6.4) replace by [M j...m 1 N j...n 1, η 20 M j...m 1 N j...n 1 ) [x, 2x). 6.5) Since Λ 1 Λ 2 is supporte on [η 20 x, η 20 x] [2η 20 x, 2η 20 x] an Λ 1 Λ 2 )n) τ 20 n)l, by Lemma 8 we have Λ 1 Λ 2 ;, c) xl A. Further, let D 2 <<D 2 P,P 0 )<D 1 c C i ) 10 ) 10 Λ 3 = 1) j 1 log N 1 ) µκ Mj )... µκ M1 ) κ Nj )... κ N1 ) 6.6) j j=1 M j,...,m 1,N j,...,n 1 with M j,..., M 1, N j,..., N 1 satisfying 6.3) an 6.5). Since Λ 2 Λ 3 )n) τ 20 n)l 2A, by Lemma 8 we have Λ 2 Λ 3 ;, c) xl A. D 2 <<D 2 P,P 0 )<D 1 c C i ) Now assume that 1 j j 10. Let γ be of the form γ = log N j )µκ Mj )... µκ M1 ) κ Nj )... κ N1 ). with M j,..., M 1, N j,..., N 1 satisfying 6.3) an 6.5), an N j... N 1. We claim that either the estimate γ;, c) x1 ϖ+ε 6.7) trivially hols for < D 2 an c, ) = 1, or γ is of Type I, II or III. Write M t = x µt an N t = x νt. We have 0 µ t 1 10, 0 ν j... ν 1, 1 µ j µ 1 + ν j ν 1 < 1 + log 2 L. In the case 3/8 + 8ϖ < ν 1 1/2, γ is of Type I or II by choosing β = κ N1 ; in the case 1/2 < ν 1 1/2 + 3ϖ, γ is of Type II by choosing α = κ N1 ; in the case 1/2 + 3ϖ < ν 1, the estimate 6.7) trivially hols. Since ν 1 2/5 if j = 1, 2, it remains to eal with the case j 3, ν ϖ. 25
26 Write ν = µ j µ 1 + ν j ν 4 the partial sum ν j ν 4 is voi if j = 3). In the case ν + ν 1 3/8 + 8ϖ, γ is obviously of Type III. Further, if ν has a partial sum, say ν, satisfying ϖ < ν + ν 1 < 5 8 8ϖ, then γ is of Type I or II. For example, if ϖ < µ j µ 1 + ν 1 1 2, we choose β = µκ Mj )... µκ M1 ) κ N1 ); if 1 2 < µ j µ 1 + ν 1 < 5 8 8ϖ, we choose α = µκ Mj )... µκ M1 ) κ N1 ). It now suffices to assume that an every partial sum ν of ν satisfies either ν + ν 1 5 8ϖ, 6.8) 8 ν + ν ϖ or ν + ν ϖ. Let ν 1 be the smallest partial sum of ν such that ν 1 + ν 1 5/8 8ϖ the existence of ν 1 follows from 6.8), an there may be more than one choice of ν 1), an let ν be a positive term in ν 1. Since ν 1 ν is also a partial sum of ν, we must have so that ν 1 ν + ν 1 3/8 + 8ϖ, ν ϖ. This implies that ν must be one of the ν t, t 4 that arises only if j 4). In particular we have ν 4 1/4 16ϖ. Now, the conitions ϖ ν 4 ν 3 ν 2 ν 1, ν 4 + ν 3 + ν 2 + ν 1 < 1 + log 2 L together imply that ϖ ν 3 + ν 4 < log 2 2L. It follows that γ is of Type I or II by choosing β = κ N3 κ N4. It shoul be remarke, by the SiegelWalfisz theorem, that for all the choices of β above the SiegelWalfisz assumption in A 2 ) hols. Noting that the sum in 6.6) contains OL 40A ) terms, by the above iscussion we conclue that 6.2) implies 6.1). 26
Factoring Dickson polynomials over finite fields
Factoring Dickson polynomials over finite fiels Manjul Bhargava Department of Mathematics, Princeton University. Princeton NJ 08544 manjul@math.princeton.eu Michael Zieve Department of Mathematics, University
More informationWitt#5e: Generalizing integrality theorems for ghostwitt vectors [not completed, not proofread]
Witt vectors. Part 1 Michiel Hazewinkel Sienotes by Darij Grinberg Witt#5e: Generalizing integrality theorems for ghostwitt vectors [not complete, not proofrea In this note, we will generalize most of
More informationIntegral Regular Truncated Pyramids with Rectangular Bases
Integral Regular Truncate Pyramis with Rectangular Bases Konstantine Zelator Department of Mathematics 301 Thackeray Hall University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 1560, U.S.A. Also: Konstantine Zelator
More informationA Generalization of Sauer s Lemma to Classes of LargeMargin Functions
A Generalization of Sauer s Lemma to Classes of LargeMargin Functions Joel Ratsaby University College Lonon Gower Street, Lonon WC1E 6BT, Unite Kingom J.Ratsaby@cs.ucl.ac.uk, WWW home page: http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/j.ratsaby/
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 14 10/27/2008 MOMENT GENERATING FUNCTIONS
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 14 10/27/2008 MOMENT GENERATING FUNCTIONS Contents 1. Moment generating functions 2. Sum of a ranom number of ranom variables 3. Transforms
More informationCHAPTER 5 : CALCULUS
Dr Roger Ni (Queen Mary, University of Lonon)  5. CHAPTER 5 : CALCULUS Differentiation Introuction to Differentiation Calculus is a branch of mathematics which concerns itself with change. Irrespective
More informationM147 Practice Problems for Exam 2
M47 Practice Problems for Exam Exam will cover sections 4., 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 5., an 5.. Calculators will not be allowe on the exam. The first ten problems on the exam will be multiple choice. Work
More informationChapter 2 Review of Classical Action Principles
Chapter Review of Classical Action Principles This section grew out of lectures given by Schwinger at UCLA aroun 1974, which were substantially transforme into Chap. 8 of Classical Electroynamics (Schwinger
More informationThe cyclotomic polynomials
The cyclotomic polynomials Notes by G.J.O. Jameson 1. The definition and general results We use the notation e(t) = e 2πit. Note that e(n) = 1 for integers n, e(s + t) = e(s)e(t) for all s, t. e( 1 ) =
More information19.2. First Order Differential Equations. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
First Orer Differential Equations 19.2 Introuction Separation of variables is a technique commonly use to solve first orer orinary ifferential equations. It is socalle because we rearrange the equation
More informationMath 230.01, Fall 2012: HW 1 Solutions
Math 3., Fall : HW Solutions Problem (p.9 #). Suppose a wor is picke at ranom from this sentence. Fin: a) the chance the wor has at least letters; SOLUTION: All wors are equally likely to be chosen. The
More informationAn example of a computable
An example of a computable absolutely normal number Verónica Becher Santiago Figueira Abstract The first example of an absolutely normal number was given by Sierpinski in 96, twenty years before the concept
More informationMSc. Econ: MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1995 MAXIMUMLIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION
MAXIMUMLIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION The General Theory of ML Estimation In orer to erive an ML estimator, we are boun to make an assumption about the functional form of the istribution which generates the
More informationOn the Union of Arithmetic Progressions
On the Union of Arithmetic Progressions Shoni Gilboa Rom Pinchasi August, 04 Abstract We show that for any integer n and real ɛ > 0, the union of n arithmetic progressions with pairwise distinct differences,
More informationGiven three vectors A, B, andc. We list three products with formula (A B) C = B(A C) A(B C); A (B C) =B(A C) C(A B);
1.1.4. Prouct of three vectors. Given three vectors A, B, anc. We list three proucts with formula (A B) C = B(A C) A(B C); A (B C) =B(A C) C(A B); a 1 a 2 a 3 (A B) C = b 1 b 2 b 3 c 1 c 2 c 3 where the
More informationJON HOLTAN. if P&C Insurance Ltd., Oslo, Norway ABSTRACT
OPTIMAL INSURANCE COVERAGE UNDER BONUSMALUS CONTRACTS BY JON HOLTAN if P&C Insurance Lt., Oslo, Norway ABSTRACT The paper analyses the questions: Shoul or shoul not an iniviual buy insurance? An if so,
More informationLecture 17: Implicit differentiation
Lecture 7: Implicit ifferentiation Nathan Pflueger 8 October 203 Introuction Toay we iscuss a technique calle implicit ifferentiation, which provies a quicker an easier way to compute many erivatives we
More informationCh 10. Arithmetic Average Options and Asian Opitons
Ch 10. Arithmetic Average Options an Asian Opitons I. Asian Option an the Analytic Pricing Formula II. Binomial Tree Moel to Price Average Options III. Combination of Arithmetic Average an Reset Options
More informationMATH 289 PROBLEM SET 1: INDUCTION. 1. The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear:
MATH 89 PROBLEM SET : INDUCTION The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear: Axiom Every nonempty subset of the set of nonnegative integers Z 0 = {0,,, 3,
More informationBESSEL FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction The standard form for any second order homogeneous differential
BESSEL FUNCTIONS FAYEZ KAROJI, CASEY TSAI, AND RACHEL WEYRENS Abstract. We briefly aress how to solve Bessel s ifferential equation an escribe its solutions, Bessel functions. Aitionally, we iscuss two
More informationOn the numbertheoretic functions ν(n) and Ω(n)
ACTA ARITHMETICA LXXVIII.1 (1996) On the numbertheoretic functions ν(n) and Ω(n) by Jiahai Kan (Nanjing) 1. Introduction. Let d(n) denote the divisor function, ν(n) the number of distinct prime factors,
More informationPythagorean Triples Over Gaussian Integers
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 6, 01, no., 5564 Pythagorean Triples Over Gaussian Integers Cheranoot Somboonkulavui 1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University Bangkok
More informationU.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra
U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory
More informationOn Adaboost and Optimal Betting Strategies
On Aaboost an Optimal Betting Strategies Pasquale Malacaria 1 an Fabrizio Smerali 1 1 School of Electronic Engineering an Computer Science, Queen Mary University of Lonon, Lonon, UK Abstract We explore
More informationA New Vulnerable Class of Exponents in RSA
A ew Vulnerable Class of Exponents in RSA Aberrahmane itaj Laboratoire e Mathmatiues icolas Oresme Universit e Caen, France nitaj@math.unicaen.fr http://www.math.unicaen.fr/~nitaj Abstract Let = p be an
More informationWeb Appendices of Selling to Overcon dent Consumers
Web Appenices of Selling to Overcon ent Consumers Michael D. Grubb A Option Pricing Intuition This appenix provies aitional intuition base on option pricing for the result in Proposition 2. Consier the
More informationInverse Trig Functions
Inverse Trig Functions c A Math Support Center Capsule February, 009 Introuction Just as trig functions arise in many applications, so o the inverse trig functions. What may be most surprising is that
More informationThe sum of digits of polynomial values in arithmetic progressions
The sum of digits of polynomial values in arithmetic progressions Thomas Stoll Institut de Mathématiques de Luminy, Université de la Méditerranée, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France Email: stoll@iml.univmrs.fr
More informationLECTURE 15: LINEAR ARRAY THEORY  PART I
LECTURE 5: LINEAR ARRAY THEORY  PART I (Linear arrays: the twoelement array; the Nelement array with uniform amplitue an spacing; broa  sie array; enfire array; phase array). Introuction Usually the
More information2 HYPERBOLIC FUNCTIONS
HYPERBOLIC FUNCTIONS Chapter Hyperbolic Functions Objectives After stuying this chapter you shoul unerstan what is meant by a hyperbolic function; be able to fin erivatives an integrals of hyperbolic functions;
More informationFirewall Design: Consistency, Completeness, and Compactness
C IS COS YS TE MS Firewall Design: Consistency, Completeness, an Compactness Mohame G. Goua an XiangYang Alex Liu Department of Computer Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 787121188,
More information6. Metric spaces. In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. d : X X [0, )
6. Metric spaces In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. Definitions. A metric on a nonempty set X is a map with the following properties: d : X X [0, ) (i) If x, y X are points
More information2r 1. Definition (Degree Measure). Let G be a rgraph of order n and average degree d. Let S V (G). The degree measure µ(s) of S is defined by,
Theorem Simple Containers Theorem) Let G be a simple, rgraph of average egree an of orer n Let 0 < δ < If is large enough, then there exists a collection of sets C PV G)) satisfying: i) for every inepenent
More informationThe Quick Calculus Tutorial
The Quick Calculus Tutorial This text is a quick introuction into Calculus ieas an techniques. It is esigne to help you if you take the Calculus base course Physics 211 at the same time with Calculus I,
More informationMean value theorems for long Dirichlet polynomials and tails of Dirichlet series
ACA ARIHMEICA LXXXIV.2 998 Mean value theorems for long Dirichlet polynomials and tails of Dirichlet series by D. A. Goldston San Jose, Calif. and S. M. Gonek Rochester, N.Y. We obtain formulas for computing
More informationAnswers to the Practice Problems for Test 2
Answers to the Practice Problems for Test 2 Davi Murphy. Fin f (x) if it is known that x [f(2x)] = x2. By the chain rule, x [f(2x)] = f (2x) 2, so 2f (2x) = x 2. Hence f (2x) = x 2 /2, but the lefthan
More informationCHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.
CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,
More informationNotes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan
The General Approach Notes on Factoring MA 26 Kurt Bryan Suppose I hand you n, a 2 digit integer and tell you that n is composite, with smallest prime factor around 5 digits. Finding a nontrivial factor
More informationLecture L253D Rigid Body Kinematics
J. Peraire, S. Winall 16.07 Dynamics Fall 2008 Version 2.0 Lecture L253D Rigi Boy Kinematics In this lecture, we consier the motion of a 3D rigi boy. We shall see that in the general threeimensional
More informationKevin James. MTHSC 412 Section 2.4 Prime Factors and Greatest Comm
MTHSC 412 Section 2.4 Prime Factors and Greatest Common Divisor Greatest Common Divisor Definition Suppose that a, b Z. Then we say that d Z is a greatest common divisor (gcd) of a and b if the following
More informationI. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES
I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called
More informationMathematics Review for Economists
Mathematics Review for Economists by John E. Floy University of Toronto May 9, 2013 This ocument presents a review of very basic mathematics for use by stuents who plan to stuy economics in grauate school
More informationThe Inefficiency of Marginal cost pricing on roads
The Inefficiency of Marginal cost pricing on roas Sofia GrahnVoornevel Sweish National Roa an Transport Research Institute VTI CTS Working Paper 4:6 stract The economic principle of roa pricing is that
More informationSolutions of Laplace s equation in 3d
Solutions of Laplace s equation in 3 Motivation The general form of Laplace s equation is: Ψ = 0 ; it contains the laplacian, an nothing else. This section will examine the form of the solutions of Laplaces
More informationA simple criterion on degree sequences of graphs
Discrete Applied Mathematics 156 (2008) 3513 3517 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Discrete Applied Mathematics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dam Note A simple criterion on degree
More informationA Comparison of Performance Measures for Online Algorithms
A Comparison of Performance Measures for Online Algorithms Joan Boyar 1, Sany Irani 2, an Kim S. Larsen 1 1 Department of Mathematics an Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55,
More informationWeb Appendices to Selling to Overcon dent Consumers
Web Appenices to Selling to Overcon ent Consumers Michael D. Grubb MIT Sloan School of Management Cambrige, MA 02142 mgrubbmit.eu www.mit.eu/~mgrubb May 2, 2008 B Option Pricing Intuition This appenix
More informationOn the least prime in. Andrew Granville and Carl Pomerance * Abstract. We nd innitely many pairs of coprime integers, a and q, such that the
On the least prime in certain arithmetic progressions by Andrew Granville and Carl Pomerance * Abstract We nd innitely many pairs of coprime integers, a and q, such that the least prime a (mod q) is unusually
More informationCounting Primes whose Sum of Digits is Prime
2 3 47 6 23 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 5 (202), Article 2.2.2 Counting Primes whose Sum of Digits is Prime Glyn Harman Department of Mathematics Royal Holloway, University of London Egham Surrey
More informationNOTE ON NORMAL DECIMALS 59 This is a stronger result than that asserted in Theorem 1. But the proof of Theorem 1 is simpler than that of Theorem 2, an
NOTE ON NORMAL DECIMALS H. DAVENPORT AND P. ERDÖS 1. Introduction. A real number, expressed as a decimal, is said to be normal (in the scale of 10) if every combination of digits occurs in the decimal
More information10.2 Systems of Linear Equations: Matrices
SECTION 0.2 Systems of Linear Equations: Matrices 7 0.2 Systems of Linear Equations: Matrices OBJECTIVES Write the Augmente Matrix of a System of Linear Equations 2 Write the System from the Augmente Matrix
More informationImproved division by invariant integers
1 Improve ivision by invariant integers Niels Möller an Torbjörn Granlun Abstract This paper consiers the problem of iviing a twowor integer by a singlewor integer, together with a few extensions an
More informationHere the units used are radians and sin x = sin(x radians). Recall that sin x and cos x are defined and continuous everywhere and
Lecture 9 : Derivatives of Trigonometric Functions (Please review Trigonometry uner Algebra/Precalculus Review on the class webpage.) In this section we will look at the erivatives of the trigonometric
More informationIrreducibility criteria for compositions and multiplicative convolutions of polynomials with integer coefficients
DOI: 10.2478/auom20140007 An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 221),2014, 73 84 Irreducibility criteria for compositions and multiplicative convolutions of polynomials with integer coefficients Anca
More informationOn the greatest and least prime factors of n! + 1, II
Publ. Math. Debrecen Manuscript May 7, 004 On the greatest and least prime factors of n! + 1, II By C.L. Stewart In memory of Béla Brindza Abstract. Let ε be a positive real number. We prove that 145 1
More informationIntroduction to Analytic Number Theory Math 531 Lecture Notes, Fall 2005
Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Math 531 Lecture Notes, Fall 2005 A.J. Hildebrand Department of Mathematics University of Illinois http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~hildebr/ant Version 2013.01.07 18 Chapter
More informationSan Jose Math Circle October 17, 2009 ARITHMETIC AND GEOMETRIC PROGRESSIONS
San Jose Math Circle October 17, 2009 ARITHMETIC AND GEOMETRIC PROGRESSIONS DEFINITION. An arithmetic progression is a (finite or infinite) sequence of numbers with the property that the difference between
More informationOptimal Control Policy of a Production and Inventory System for multiproduct in Segmented Market
RATIO MATHEMATICA 25 (2013), 29 46 ISSN:15927415 Optimal Control Policy of a Prouction an Inventory System for multiprouct in Segmente Market Kuleep Chauhary, Yogener Singh, P. C. Jha Department of Operational
More informationPrime numbers and prime polynomials. Paul Pollack Dartmouth College
Prime numbers and prime polynomials Paul Pollack Dartmouth College May 1, 2008 Analogies everywhere! Analogies in elementary number theory (continued fractions, quadratic reciprocity, Fermat s last theorem)
More informationUsing Stein s Method to Show Poisson and Normal Limit Laws for Fringe Subtrees
AofA 2014, Paris, France DMTCS proc. (subm., by the authors, 1 12 Using Stein s Metho to Show Poisson an Normal Limit Laws for Fringe Subtrees Cecilia Holmgren 1 an Svante Janson 2 1 Department of Mathematics,
More informationFurther linear algebra. Chapter I. Integers.
Further linear algebra. Chapter I. Integers. Andrei Yafaev Number theory is the theory of Z = {0, ±1, ±2,...}. 1 Euclid s algorithm, Bézout s identity and the greatest common divisor. We say that a Z divides
More informationFOURIER TRANSFORM TERENCE TAO
FOURIER TRANSFORM TERENCE TAO Very broaly speaking, the Fourier transform is a systematic way to ecompose generic functions into a superposition of symmetric functions. These symmetric functions are usually
More informationconsidered as a polynomial on K mn. That the limit exists is a result of Zaharjuta [Z] where the following remarkable formula is proved:
July 3, THE TRANSFINITE DIAMETER OF THE REAL BALL AND SIMPLEX T. BLOOM*, L. BOS, AND N. LEVENBERG Abstract. We calculate the transfinite iameter for the real unit ball, B := {x R : x } an the real unit
More information61. REARRANGEMENTS 119
61. REARRANGEMENTS 119 61. Rearrangements Here the difference between conditionally and absolutely convergent series is further refined through the concept of rearrangement. Definition 15. (Rearrangement)
More informationSieves in Number Theory
Sieves in Number Theory Lecture Notes Taught Course Centre 007 Tim Browning, Roger HeathBrown Tyeset by Sanro Bettin All errors are the resonsibility of the tyesetter. In articular there are some arguments
More informationModelling and Resolving Software Dependencies
June 15, 2005 Abstract Many Linux istributions an other moern operating systems feature the explicit eclaration of (often complex) epenency relationships between the pieces of software
More informationSensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Performance with Probability Distortion
Preprints of the 19th Worl Congress The International Feeration of Automatic Control Cape Town, South Africa. August 2429, 214 Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Performance with Probability Distortion
More informationThe Dirichlet Unit Theorem
Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if
More informationIntroduction to Integration Part 1: AntiDifferentiation
Mathematics Learning Centre Introuction to Integration Part : AntiDifferentiation Mary Barnes c 999 University of Syney Contents For Reference. Table of erivatives......2 New notation.... 2 Introuction
More information11 Ideals. 11.1 Revisiting Z
11 Ideals The presentation here is somewhat different than the text. In particular, the sections do not match up. We have seen issues with the failure of unique factorization already, e.g., Z[ 5] = O Q(
More informationANALYTICAL MATHEMATICS FOR APPLICATIONS 2016 LECTURE NOTES Series
ANALYTICAL MATHEMATICS FOR APPLICATIONS 206 LECTURE NOTES 8 ISSUED 24 APRIL 206 A series is a formal sum. Series a + a 2 + a 3 + + + where { } is a sequence of real numbers. Here formal means that we don
More informationRecent progress in additive prime number theory
Recent progress in additive prime number theory University of California, Los Angeles Mahler Lecture Series Additive prime number theory Additive prime number theory is the study of additive patterns in
More informationChapter 2 Limits Functions and Sequences sequence sequence Example
Chapter Limits In the net few chapters we shall investigate several concepts from calculus, all of which are based on the notion of a limit. In the normal sequence of mathematics courses that students
More informationnparameter families of curves
1 nparameter families of curves For purposes of this iscussion, a curve will mean any equation involving x, y, an no other variables. Some examples of curves are x 2 + (y 3) 2 = 9 circle with raius 3,
More informationMATH 289 PROBLEM SET 4: NUMBER THEORY
MATH 289 PROBLEM SET 4: NUMBER THEORY 1. The greatest common divisor If d and n are integers, then we say that d divides n if and only if there exists an integer q such that n = qd. Notice that if d divides
More informationMeasures of distance between samples: Euclidean
4 Chapter 4 Measures of istance between samples: Eucliean We will be talking a lot about istances in this book. The concept of istance between two samples or between two variables is funamental in multivariate
More informationCoupled best proximity point theorems for proximally gmeirkeelertypemappings in partially ordered metric spaces
Abkar et al. Fixe Point Theory an Applications 2015) 2015:107 DOI 10.1186/s1366301503559 R E S E A R C H Open Access Couple best proximity point theorems for proximally gmeirkeelertypemappings in
More informationSeries. Chapter Convergence of series
Chapter 4 Series Divergent series are the devil, and it is a shame to base on them any demonstration whatsoever. Niels Henrik Abel, 826 This series is divergent, therefore we may be able to do something
More informationTAKEAWAY GAMES. ALLEN J. SCHWENK California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California INTRODUCTION
TAKEAWAY GAMES ALLEN J. SCHWENK California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California L INTRODUCTION Several games of Tf takeaway?f have become popular. The purpose of this paper is to determine the
More informationPurpose of the Experiments. Principles and Error Analysis. ε 0 is the dielectric constant,ε 0. ε r. = 8.854 10 12 F/m is the permittivity of
Experiments with Parallel Plate Capacitors to Evaluate the Capacitance Calculation an Gauss Law in Electricity, an to Measure the Dielectric Constants of a Few Soli an Liqui Samples Table of Contents Purpose
More informationAn intertemporal model of the real exchange rate, stock market, and international debt dynamics: policy simulations
This page may be remove to conceal the ientities of the authors An intertemporal moel of the real exchange rate, stock market, an international ebt ynamics: policy simulations Saziye Gazioglu an W. Davi
More informationThe wave equation is an important tool to study the relation between spectral theory and geometry on manifolds. Let U R n be an open set and let
1. The wave equation The wave equation is an important tool to stuy the relation between spectral theory an geometry on manifols. Let U R n be an open set an let = n j=1 be the Eucliean Laplace operator.
More informationON THE COEFFICIENTS OF THE CYCLOTOMIC POLYNOMIAL
ON THE COEFFICIENTS OF THE CYCLOTOMIC POLYNOMIAL PAUL ERDÖS The cyclotomic polynomial F n (x) is defined as the polynomial whose roots are the primitive nth roots of unity. It is well known that Fn(x)
More informationThe Pigeonhole Principle
The Pigeonhole Principle 1 Pigeonhole Principle: Simple form Theorem 1.1. If n + 1 objects are put into n boxes, then at least one box contains two or more objects. Proof. Trivial. Example 1.1. Among 13
More informationLecture 13: Differentiation Derivatives of Trigonometric Functions
Lecture 13: Differentiation Derivatives of Trigonometric Functions Derivatives of the Basic Trigonometric Functions Derivative of sin Derivative of cos Using the Chain Rule Derivative of tan Using the
More informationPrime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials
Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.
More informationThe minimum number of monochromatic 4term progressions
The minimum number of monochromatic 4term progressions Rutgers University May 28, 2009 Monochromatic 3term progressions Monochromatic 4term progressions 1 Introduction Monochromatic 3term progressions
More information(We assume that x 2 IR n with n > m f g are twice continuously ierentiable functions with Lipschitz secon erivatives. The Lagrangian function `(x y) i
An Analysis of Newton's Metho for Equivalent Karush{Kuhn{Tucker Systems Lus N. Vicente January 25, 999 Abstract In this paper we analyze the application of Newton's metho to the solution of systems of
More information1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1
Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or
More informationarcsine (inverse sine) function
Inverse Trigonometric Functions c 00 Donal Kreier an Dwight Lahr We will introuce inverse functions for the sine, cosine, an tangent. In efining them, we will point out the issues that must be consiere
More informationGeneralizing the Ramsey Problem through Diameter
Generalizing the Ramsey Problem through Diameter Dhruv Mubayi Submitted: January 8, 001; Accepted: November 13, 001. MR Subject Classifications: 05C1, 05C15, 05C35, 05C55 Abstract Given a graph G and positive
More informationChapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly and Monosony Monopoly: market with only one seller. Demand function, TR, AR, and MR
ECON191 (Spring 2011) 27 & 29.4.2011 (Tutorial 9) Chapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly an Monosony Monopoly: market with only one seller a Deman function, TR, AR, an P p=a bq ( q) AR( q) for all q except
More informationOn the largest prime factor of the Mersenne numbers
On the largest prime factor of the Mersenne numbers Kevin Ford Department of Mathematics The University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign Urbana Champaign, IL 61801, USA ford@math.uiuc.edu Florian Luca Instituto
More informationOn an antiramsey type result
On an antiramsey type result Noga Alon, Hanno Lefmann and Vojtĕch Rödl Abstract We consider antiramsey type results. For a given coloring of the kelement subsets of an nelement set X, where two kelement
More informationOn the Least Prime Number in a Beatty Sequence. Jörn Steuding (Würzburg)  joint work with Marc Technau  Salamanca, 31 July 2015
On the Least Prime Number in a Beatty Sequence Jörn Steuding (Würzburg)  joint work with Marc Technau  Salamanca, 31 July 2015 i. Beatty Sequences ii. Prime Numbers in a Beatty Sequence iii. The Least
More informationHomework until Test #2
MATH31: Number Theory Homework until Test # Philipp BRAUN Section 3.1 page 43, 1. It has been conjectured that there are infinitely many primes of the form n. Exhibit five such primes. Solution. Five such
More informationSome Polynomial Theorems. John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.
Some Polynomial Theorems by John Kennedy Mathematics Department Santa Monica College 1900 Pico Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90405 rkennedy@ix.netcom.com This paper contains a collection of 31 theorems, lemmas,
More informationNotes on tangents to parabolas
Notes on tangents to parabolas (These are notes for a talk I gave on 2007 March 30.) The point of this talk is not to publicize new results. The most recent material in it is the concept of Bézier curves,
More informationLagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics
Lagrangian an Hamiltonian Mechanics D.G. Simpson, Ph.D. Department of Physical Sciences an Engineering Prince George s Community College December 5, 007 Introuction In this course we have been stuying
More informationParameterized Algorithms for dhitting Set: the Weighted Case Henning Fernau. Univ. Trier, FB 4 Abteilung Informatik 54286 Trier, Germany
Parameterize Algorithms for Hitting Set: the Weighte Case Henning Fernau Trierer Forschungsberichte; Trier: Technical Reports Informatik / Mathematik No. 086, July 2008 Univ. Trier, FB 4 Abteilung Informatik
More information