Positive Integers n Such That σ(φ(n)) = σ(n)


 Oswin Lamb
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. (2008), Article Positive Integers n Such That σ(φ(n)) = σ(n) JeanMarie De Koninck Départment de Mathématiques Université Laval Québec, PQ GK 7P4 Canada Florian Luca Instituto de Matemáticas Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méico C.P Morelia, Michoacán Méico Abstract In this paper, we investigate those positive integers n for which the equality σ(φ(n)) = σ(n) holds, where σ is the sum of the divisors function and φ is the Euler function. Introduction For a positive integer n we write σ(n) and φ(n) for the sum of divisors function and for the Euler function of n, respectively. In this note, we study those positive integers n such that σ(φ(n)) = σ(n) holds. This is sequence A03363 in Sloane s Online Encylopedia of Integer Sequences. Let A be the set of all such positive integers n and for a positive real number we put A() = A [,]. Our result is the following.
2 Theorem. The estimate holds for all real numbers >. ( ) #A() = O (log ) 2 The above upper bound might actually be the correct order of magnitude of #A(). Indeed, note that if m is such that σ(2φ(m)) = 2σ(m) () and if q > m is a Sophie Germain prime, that is a prime number q such that p = 2q + is also prime, then n = mp A. The numbers m = 238, 2806, 5734, 5937, 798, 8097,... all satisfy relation (), and form Sloane s sequence A More generally, if k and m are positive integers such that σ(2 k φ(m)) = 2 k σ(m) (2) and q <... < q k are primes with p i = 2q i + also primes for i =,...,k and q > m, then n = p...p k m A. Now recall that the Prime Ktuplets Conjecture of Dickson (see, for instance, [2, 4, 8]) asserts that, ecept in cases ruled out by obvious congruence conditions, K linear forms a i n+b i, i =,...,K, take prime values simultaneously for about c/(log ) K integers n, where c is a positive constant which depends only on the given linear forms. Under this conjecture (applied with K = 2 and the linear forms n and 2n+), we obtain that there should be /(log ) 2 Sophie Germain primes q, which suggests that #A() /(log ) 2. We will come back to the Sophie Germain primes later. Throughout, we use the Vinogradov symbols and and the Landau symbols O and o with their regular meanings. We use log for the natural logarithm and p, q and r with or without subscripts for prime numbers. 2 Preliminary Results In this section, we point out a subset B() of all the positive integers n of cardinality O(/(log ) 2 ). For the proof of Theorem we will work only with the positive integers n A()\B(). Further, 0 is a sufficiently large positive real number, where the meaning of sufficiently large may change from a line to the net. We put ( ) log y = ep. log log For a positive integer n we write P(n) for the largest prime factor of n. It is well known that Ψ(,y) = #{n P(n) y} = ep( ( + o())u log u) (u ), (3) where u = log / log y, provided that u y /2 (see [], Corollary.3 of [6], or Chapter III.5 of [9]). In our case, u = log log, so, in particular, the condition u y /2 is satisfied for > 0. We deduce that u log u = (log log )(log log log ). 2
3 Thus, if we set B () = {n P(n) y}, then We now let #B () = Ψ(,y) = ep ( ( + o())(log log )(log log log )) < for > (log ) 0 0. (4) z = (log ) 26 and for a positive integer n we write ρ(n) for its largest squarefull divisor. Recall that a positive integer m is squarefull if p 2 m whenever p is a prime factor of m. It is well known that if we write S(t) = {m t m is squarefull}, then #S(t) = ζ(3/2) ζ(3) t/2 + O(t /3 ), where ζ is the Riemann ZetaFunction (see, for eample, Theorem 4.4 in [7]). By partial summation, we easily get that m t/2. (5) m t m squarefull We now let B 2 () be the set of positive integers n such that one of the following conditions holds: (i) ρ(n) z, (ii) p n for some prime p such that ρ(p ± ) z, (iii) there eist primes r and p such that p n, p ± (mod r) and ρ(r ± ) z. We will find an upper bound for #B 2 (). Let B 2, () be the set of those n B 2 () for which (i) holds. We note that for every n B 2, () there eists a squarefull positive integer d z such that d n. For a fied d, the number of such n does not eceed /d. Hence, #B 2, () d z d squarefull d (log ) 3, (6) where we have used estimate (5) with t = z. Now let B 2,2 () be the set of those n B 2 () for which (ii) holds. We note that each n B 2,2 () has a prime divisor p such that p ± (mod d), where d is as above. Given d and p, the number of such n does not eceed /p. Summing up over all choices of p and d we get that #B 2,2 () d z d squarefull p ± (mod d) p (log log ) 2 d z d squarefull 3 p d d z d squarefull log log φ(d) (log log )2 (log ) 3, (7)
4 where in the above estimates we used aside from estimate (5), the fact that the estimate ( ) p log log p (a,b) + O (8) φ(b) p a (mod b) p holds uniformly in a, b and when b, where a and b are coprime and p (a,b) is the smallest prime number p a (mod b) (note that p (,b) b+ and p (,b) = p (b,b) b φ(b) for all b 2), together with the well known minimal order φ(n)/n / log log, valid for n in the interval [,]. Let B 2,3 () be the set of those n B 2 () for which (iii) holds. Then there eists r such that r ± (mod d) for some d as above, as well as p n such that r p or r p +. Given d, r and p, the number of such n does not eceed /p, and now summing up over all choices of d, r and p, we get that #B 2,3 () d z r ± (mod d) d squarefull r d z r ± (mod d) d squarefull r (log log ) 2 d z d squarefull (log log ) 3 d z d squarefull (log log ) 4 d z d squarefull p ± (mod r) p log log φ(r) r ± (mod d) r φ(d) d r p (log log )4 (log ) 3, (9) where in the above estimates we used again estimate (5), estimate (8) twice as well as the minimal order of the Euler function on the interval [,]. Hence, using estimates (6) (9), we get #B 2 () #B 2, () + #B 2,2 () + #B 2,3 () < (log ) 0 for > 0. (0) We now put and set w = 0 log log S(w,) = ω(m) w m m, 4
5 where ω(m) denotes the number of distinct prime factors of the positive integer m. Note that, using the fact that p = log log t + O() and Stirling s formula k! = (+o())kk e k 2πk, p t we have S(w,) = k w ω(m)=k m m = k w k! ( p α ) k p α = ( ( )) k k! p + O p 2 k w p p 2 k w ( ) k e log log + O() ( e log log + O() k w k w k w ( ) w e log log + O() w for > 0 because 0 log(0/e) >. (log log + O()))k k! ) k (log ) 0 log(0/e) < (log ) () We now let B 3 () be the set of positive integers n such that one of the following conditions holds: (i) ω(n) w, (ii) p n for some prime p for which ω(p ± ) w, (iii) there eist primes r and p such that p n, p ± (mod r) and ω(r ± ) w. Let B 3, (), B 3,2 () and B 3,3 () be the sets of n B 3 () for which (i), (ii) and (iii) hold, respectively. To bound the cardinality of B 3, (), note that, using (), we have #B 3, () = ω(n) w n ω(n) w n n = S(w,) < (log ) (2) for > 0. To bound the cardinality of B 3,2 (), note that each n B 3,2 () admits a prime divisor p such that ω(p ±) w. Fiing such a p, the number of such n does not eceed /p. Summing up over all such p we have, again in light of (), #B 3,2 () ω(p±) w p p ω(p+) w p+ + 2 p + + ω(p ) w p p (2S(w, + ) + S(w,)) < 3S(w,) + 2 (log ) (3) 5
6 for > 0. To bound the cardinality of B 3,3 (), note that for each n B 3,3 () there eist some prime r with ω(r ± ) w and some prime p n such that p ± (mod r). Given such r and p, the number of such n does not eceed /p. Summing up over all choices of r and p given above we get, again using (), for > 0. #B 3,3 () ω(r±) w r = (log log ) (log log ) p ± (mod r) p ω(r±) w r p ω(r ) w r r = (log log ) r + ω(r+) w r+ (log log )(S(w,) + 3S(w, + )) 4(log log )S(w,) + O(log log ) Hence, using estimates (2) to (4), we get We now let #B 3 () #B 3, () + #B 3,2 () + #B 3,3 () < ω(r±) w r 3 r + φ(r) (log log ) (log ) (4) (log ) 0 for > 0. (5) B 4 () = {n n (B () B 2 ()) and p 2 φ(n) for some p > z}. Let n B 4 () and let p 2 φ(n) for some prime p. Then it is not possible that p 2 n (because n B 2 ()), nor is it possible that p 2 q for some prime factor q of n (again because n B 2 ()). Thus, there must eist distinct primes q and r dividing n such that q (mod p) and r (mod p). Fiing such p, q and r, the number of acceptable values of such n does not eceed /(qr). Summing up over all the possible values of p, q and r we arrive at #B 4 () z p z p q (mod p) r (mod p) q<r, qr (log log )2 (log ) 3, qr z p 2 (log log ) 2 (p ) 2 (log log ) 2 6 q (mod p) q z p p 2 q 2
7 where we used estimates (8) and (5). Hence, We now let #B 4 () < (log ) 0 for all > 0. (6) τ = ep ( (log log ) 2) and let B 5 () stand for the set of n which are multiples of a prime p for which either p or p + has a divisor d > τ with P(d) < z. Fi such a pair d and p. Then the number of n divisible by p is at most /p. This shows that #B 5 () P(d)<z τ<d P(d)<z τ<d p ± (mod d) p p log log P(d)<z τ<d d. (7) It follows easily by partial summation from the estimates (3) for Ψ(,v), that if we write v = log τ/ log z, then S = d log ep(( + o())v log v). Since v = (log log )/26, we get that and therefore that v log v = (/26 + o())(log log )(log log log ) S for all > 0, which together with estimate (7) gives Thus, setting log ep(( + o())v log v) < (8) (log ) #B 5 () < (log ) 0 for > 0. (9) B() = we get, from estimates (4), (0), (5), (6) and (9) that 5 B i (), (20) i= #B() 5 i= #B i () (log ) 0 for all > 0. (2) 3 The Proof of Theorem We find it convenient to prove a stronger theorem. 7
8 Theorem 2. Let a and b be any fied positive integers. Setting A a,b = {n σ(aφ(n)) = bσ(n)}, then the estimate holds for all 3. #A a,b () a,b (log ) 2 Proof. Let be large and let B() be as in (20). We assume that n is a positive integer not in B(). We let A () be the set of n A a,b ()\B() for which (P(n) )/2 is not prime but such that there eists a prime number r > z and another prime number q P(n) for which r gcd(p(n) +,q + ). To count the number of such positive integers n, let r and q be fied primes such that r q +, and let P be a prime such that q P and r P +. The number of positive integers n such that P(n) = P does not eceed /P. Note that the congruences P (mod r) and P (mod q) are equivalent to P a q,r (mod qr), where a q,r is the smallest positive integer m satisfying m (mod r) and m (mod q). We distinguish two instances: Case : qr < P. Let A () be the set of such integers n A (). Then #A () z<r q (mod r) q log log z<r log log z<r P a q,r (mod qr) qr<p q (mod r) q r (log log ) 2 z<r (log log ) 2 z<r q (mod r) q rφ(r) where in the above inequalities we used estimates (8) and (5). Case 2: qr P. P φ(qr) q (log log )2, (22) r2 (log ) Let A () be the set of such integers n A (). Here we write n = Pm. Note that P > P(m) because y > z for large and n B () B 2 (). Furthermore, since r q +, we may write q = rl. Since q P, we may write P = sq + = s(rl )+ = srl+ s. Since r P +, we get that s (mod r), and therefore that s 2 (mod r). Hence, there eists a nonnegative integer λ such that s = λr + 2. If λ = 0, then s = 2 leading to 8
9 P = 2q +, which is impossible. Thus, λ > 0. Let us fi the value of λ as well as that of r. Then rl = q and (λr 2 + 2r)l (λr + ) = P (23) are two linear forms in the variable l which are simultaneously primes. Note that P /m and since P lr(λr + 2), we get that l /(mr(λr + 2)). In particular, mr(λr + 2). Recall that a typical consequence of Brun s sieve (see for eample Theorem 2.3 in [3]), is that if L (m) = Am + B and L 2 (m) = Cm + D are linear forms in m with integer coefficients such that AD BC 0 and if we write E for the product of all primes p dividing ABCD(AD BC), then the number of positive integers m y such that L (m) and L 2 (m) are simultaneously primes is Ky ( E ) 2 (log y) 2 φ(e) for some absolute constant K. Applying this result for our linear forms in l shown at (23) for which A = r, B =, C = λr 2 + 2r and D = (λr + ), we get that the number of acceptable values for l does not eceed K mr(λr + 2) (log(/(mr(λr + 2))) 2 (log log )2 mr(λr + 2), ( ) 2 (λr + 2)(λr + )r φ((λr + 2)(λr + )r) where for the rightmost inequality we used again the minimal order of the Euler function on the interval [,]. Here, K is some absolute constant. Summing up over all possible values of λ, r and m, we get #A () (log log ) 2 mr(λr + 2) z<r λ m ( ) ( < (log log ) 2 r 2 where we used again estimate (5). z<r (log log )2 (log ) 2 (log ) 3 = From estimates (22) and (24), we get #A () #A () + A () < λ ) ( λ m ) m (log log )2 (log ), (24) (log ) 0 for all > 0. (25) Now let A 2 () be the set of those n A a,b ()\(A () B()) and such that (P(n) )/2 is not prime. With n A 2 (), we get that n = Pm, where P > P(m) for > 0 because 9
10 y > z for large and n B () B 2 (). Then bσ(n) = bσ(m)(p + ). Let d be the largest divisor of P + such that P(d ) z. Then P + = d l, and bσ(n) = bσ(m)d l. Furthermore, φ(n) = φ(m)(p ), so that aφ(n) = aφ(m)(p ). Let d be the largest divisor of P which is zsmooth; that is, with P(d) z. Then P = dl. Note that l is squarefree (because n B 2 ()) and l and φ(m) are coprime (for if not, there would eist a prime r > z such that r l and r φ(m), so that r 2 φ(n), which is impossible because n B 4 ()). Since z > a for > 0, we get that aφ(m)d and l are coprime, and therefore that σ(φ(n)) = σ(aφ(m)d)σ(l). We thus get the equation σ(aφ(m)d)σ(l) = bσ(m)d l. Now note that l and σ(l) are coprime. Indeed, if not, since l is squarefree, there would eist a prime factor r of l (necessarily eceeding z) dividing q + for some prime factor q of l, that is of P. But this is impossible because n A (). Thus, l σ(aφ(m)d). Note now that Pm, so that m /P /y. Furthermore, ma{d,d } τ because n B 5 (). Let us now fi m, d and d. Then l σ(aφ(m)d), and therefore the number of choices for l does not eceed τ(σ(aφ(m)d)), where τ(k) is the number of divisors of the positive integer k. The above argument shows that if we write M for the set of such acceptable values for m, then #A 2 () τ2 y ma{τ(σ(aφ(m)d)) m M, d τ, d τ}. (26) To get an upper bound on τ(σ(aφ(m)d)), we write aφ(m)d as aφ(m)d = AB, where A is squarefull, B is squarefree, and A and B are coprime. Clearly, so that Since B is squarefree, it is clear that σ(b) Furthermore, σ(aφ(m)d) = σ(ab) = σ(a)σ(b), τ(σ(aφ(m)d)) τ(σ(a))τ(σ(b)). q aφ(m)d (q + ). ω(aφ(m)d) ω(aφ(n)) ω(a) + ω(n) + p n ω(p ) w 2 + w + O(), (27) so that we have ω(aφ(m)d) 2w 2 if > 0. The above inequalities follow from the fact that n B 3 (). Also, for each one of the at most 2w 2 prime factors q of aφ(m)d, the number q+ has at most w prime factors itself and its squarefull part does not eceed z, again because 0
11 n B 3 (). In conclusion, σ(b) C, where C is a number with at most 2w 3 prime factors whose squarefull part does not eceed z 2w2. Thus, where ω(c) 2w 3 and ρ(c) z 2w2. Clearly, and since also we finally get that τ(σ(b)) τ(c) 2 ω(c) τ(ρ(c)), τ(ρ(c)) ρ(c) z w2 = ep(w 2 log z) = ep(o(log log ) 3 ), 2 ω(c) 2 2w3 = ep(o(log log ) 3 ), τ(σ(b)) = ep(o(log log ) 3 ). (28) We now deal with σ(a). We first note that P(A) z for > 0. Indeed, if q > z divides A, then q 2 aφ(n). If > 0, then z > a, in which case the above divisibility relation forces q 2 φ(n) which is not possible because n B 3 (). By looking at the multiplicities of the prime factors appearing in A, we easily see that A ρ(a)ρ(d) ρ(p ) p m q aφ(m)d q z q ω(aφ(m)d) As we have seen at estimate (27), ω(aφ(m)d) 2w 2, in which case the above relation shows that A ρ(a)z ω(aφ(m)d)+ω(aφ(m)d)2 z 4w4 +2w 2 = ep(o(log log ) 5 ). But since σ(a) < A 2 and τ(σ(a)) σ(a) A 2, we get that which together with estimate (28) gives τ(σ(a)) = ep(o(log log ) 5 ), (29) τ(σ(aφ(m)d)) τ(σ(a))τ(σ(b)) = ep(o(log log ) 5 ). Returning to estimate (26), we get that ( #A 2 () τ2 y ep(o(log log )5 ) = ep log ) log log + O((log log )5 ) < for all > (log ) 0 0. (30) Thus, writing C() = A a,b ()\(A () A 2 () B()), we get that ( A a,b () = #C() + O (log ) 0. ). (3)
12 Moreover, if n C(), then n = Pm, with P > P(m) for > 0, and (P )/2 is a prime. Hence, P = 2q, where q is a Sophie Germain prime. Since also P /m, it follows by Brun s method that the number of such values for P is m(log /m) 2 (log log )2 = m(log y) 2 m(log ). 2 In the above inequalities we used the fact that /m P y. Summing up over all m, we get #C() (log log ) 2 (log log )2. (32) m(log ) 2 log m In particular, #A a,b () (log log )2. (33) log This is weaker than the bound claimed by our Theorem 2. However, it implies, by partial summation, that n + 2 t d(#a a,b(t)) n A a,b () = + #A a,b(t) t ( t= + O t=2 t(log log t) 2 dt 2 t 2 log t = O((log log ) 3 ). (34) To get some improvement, we return to C(). Let n C() and write it as n = Pm, where P > P(m). Write also P = 2q +. Then φ(n) = 2φ(m)q. Moreover, q > (y )/2 > z for > 0 so that q does not divide aφ(m) (because q > a and n B 3 ()). Hence, σ(aφ(n)) = σ(2aφ(m))(q + ). On the other hand, bσ(n) = bσ(m)(p + ) = 2bσ(m)(q + ). Thus, the equation σ(aφ(n)) = σ(bn) forces σ(2aφ(m)) = 2bσ(m), implying that m A 2a,2b (/P) A 2a,2b (/y). The argument which leads to estimate (32) now provides the better estimate In particular, we get #C() m A 2a,2b () #A a,b () (log log ) 2 m(log ) 2 (log log )5 (log ) 2. (log log )5 (log ) 2. (35) This is still somewhat weaker than what Theorem 2 claims. However, it implies that the sum of the reciprocals of the numbers in A a,b is convergent. In fact, by partial summation, ) 2
13 it follows, as in estimates (34), that n A a,b n y n y = #A a,b(t) t t d(#a a,b(t)) t= t=y ( + O y ) t(log log t) 5 t 2 (log t) dt 2 (log log y)5 + (log y) 2 y t(log t) 3/2dt (log y) /2. (36) We now take another look at C(). Let again n C() and write n = Pm. Fiing m and using the fact that P /m is a prime such that (P )/2 is also a prime, we get that the number of choices for P is m(log(/m)) 2. Hence, #C() m A 2a,2b (/y) m(log(/m)) 2. We now split the above sum at m = /2 and use estimate (36) to get #C() m A 2a,2b ( /2 ) (log /2 ) 2 m(log(/m)) 2 + m A 2a,2b m + (log y) 2 m A 2a,2b /2 m /y m A 2a,2b m /2 m(log(/m)) 2 (log ) + 2 (log y) = (log log )5/2 + 5/2 (log ) 2 (log ) 5/2 (log ) 2, (37) which together with estimate (3) leads to the desired conclusion of Theorem 2. m 4 Acknowledgments This work was done in April of 2006, while the second author was in residence at the Centre de recherches mathématiques of the Université de Montréal for the thematic year Analysis and Number Theory. This author thanks the organizers for the opportunity of participating in this program. He was also supported in part by grants SEPCONACyT 46755, PAPIIT IN04505 and a Guggenheim Fellowship. The first author was supported in part by a grant from NSERC. 3
14 References [] E. R. Canfield, P. Erdős and C. Pomerance, On a problem of Oppenheim concerning Factorisatio Numerorum, J. Number Theory 7 (983), 28. [2] L. E. Dickson, A new etension of Dirichlet s theorem on prime numbers, Messenger of Math. 33 (904), [3] H. Halberstam and H.E. Richert, Sieve Methods, Academic Press, London, 974. [4] G. H. Hardy and J. E. Littlewood, Some problems on partitio numerorum III. On the epression of a number as a sum of primes, Acta Math. 44 (923), 70. [5] A. Hildebrand, On the number of positive integers and free of prime factors > y, J. Number Theory 22 (986), [6] A. Hildebrand and G. Tenenbaum, Integers without large prime factors, J. de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeau 5 (983), [7] A. Ivić, The Riemann ZetaFunction, Theory and Applications, Dover Publications, [8] A. Schinzel and W. Sierpiński, Sur certaines hypothèses concernant les nombres premiers, Acta Arith. 4 (958), Erratum, Acta Arith. 5 (959), 259. [9] G. Tenenbaum, Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary A25; Secondary N37. Keywords: Euler function, sum of divisors. (Concerned with sequences A03363 and A37733.) Received June ; revised version received February Published in Journal of Integer Sequences, February Return to Journal of Integer Sequences home page. 4
ON CERTAIN SUMS RELATED TO MULTIPLE DIVISIBILITY BY THE LARGEST PRIME FACTOR
Ann. Sci. Math. Québec 29 2005, no. 2, 3 45. ON CERTAIN SUMS RELATED TO MULTIPLE DIVISIBILITY BY THE LARGEST PRIME FACTOR WILLIAM D. BANKS, FLORIAN LUCA AND IGOR E. SHPARLINSKI RÉSUMÉ. Pour un nombre entier
More informationOn the numbertheoretic functions ν(n) and Ω(n)
ACTA ARITHMETICA LXXVIII.1 (1996) On the numbertheoretic functions ν(n) and Ω(n) by Jiahai Kan (Nanjing) 1. Introduction. Let d(n) denote the divisor function, ν(n) the number of distinct prime factors,
More informationProbabilistic Number Theory. Dr. Jörn Steuding
Probabilistic Number Theory Dr. Jörn Steuding Dedicated to Prof. Jonas Kubilius and the members of his working group at Vilnius University, for their outstanding work in probabilistic number theory and
More informationU.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra
U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory
More informationPRIMES is in P. Manindra Agrawal Neeraj Kayal Nitin Saxena
PRIMES is in P Manindra Agrawal Neeraj Kayal Nitin Saxena Department of Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur208016, INDIA Email: {manindra,kayaln,nitinsa}@iitk.ac.in
More information= 2 + 1 2 2 = 3 4, Now assume that P (k) is true for some fixed k 2. This means that
Instructions. Answer each of the questions on your own paper, and be sure to show your work so that partial credit can be adequately assessed. Credit will not be given for answers (even correct ones) without
More informationA Thesis. Submitted to the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics.
Some Topics in Number Theory (Refinements, Extensions and Generalisations of a Theorem of Sylvester on the prime factors of a product of consecutive integers) A Thesis Submitted to the Tata Institute of
More informationANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY LECTURE NOTES BASED ON DAVENPORT S BOOK
ANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY LECTURE NOTES BASED ON DAVENPORT S BOOK ANDREAS STRÖMBERGSSON These lecture notes follow to a large extent Davenport s book [5], but with things reordered and often expanded. The
More informationRevised Version of Chapter 23. We learned long ago how to solve linear congruences. ax c (mod m)
Chapter 23 Squares Modulo p Revised Version of Chapter 23 We learned long ago how to solve linear congruences ax c (mod m) (see Chapter 8). It s now time to take the plunge and move on to quadratic equations.
More informationA Course on Number Theory. Peter J. Cameron
A Course on Number Theory Peter J. Cameron ii Preface These are the notes of the course MTH6128, Number Theory, which I taught at Queen Mary, University of London, in the spring semester of 2009. There
More informationHow to Differentiate a Number
1 3 7 6 3 11 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 6 (003), Article 03.3. How to Differentiate a Number Victor Ufnarovski Centre for Mathematical Sciences Lund Institute of Technology P.O. Box 118 SE1 00
More informationSOLUTIONS FOR PROBLEM SET 2
SOLUTIONS FOR PROBLEM SET 2 A: There exist primes p such that p+6k is also prime for k = 1,2 and 3. One such prime is p = 11. Another such prime is p = 41. Prove that there exists exactly one prime p such
More informationAn Introductory Course in Elementary Number Theory. Wissam Raji
An Introductory Course in Elementary Number Theory Wissam Raji 2 Preface These notes serve as course notes for an undergraduate course in number theory. Most if not all universities worldwide offer introductory
More informationLAGUERRE POLYNOMIALS WITH GALOIS GROUP A m FOR EACH m
LAGUERRE POLYNOMIALS WITH GALOIS GROUP A m FOR EACH m Michael Filaseta Mathematics Department University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208 Ognian Trifonov Mathematics Department University of South
More informationAlgebra & Number Theory. A. Baker
Algebra & Number Theory [0/0/2009] A. Baker Department of Mathematics, University of Glasgow. Email address: a.baker@maths.gla.ac.uk URL: http://www.maths.gla.ac.uk/ ajb Contents Chapter. Basic Number
More informationNumber fields with large class groups
Number fields with large class groups W. Duke Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 98888. Abstract After a review of the quadratic case, a general problem about the existence
More informationAn example of a computable
An example of a computable absolutely normal number Verónica Becher Santiago Figueira Abstract The first example of an absolutely normal number was given by Sierpinski in 96, twenty years before the concept
More informationALGEBRAIC NUMBER THEORY AND QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY
ALGEBRAIC NUMBER THEORY AND QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY HENRY COHN, JOSHUA GREENE, JONATHAN HANKE 1. Introduction These notes are from a series of lectures given by Henry Cohn during MIT s Independent Activities
More informationArithmetics on number systems with irrational bases
Arithmetics on number systems with irrational bases P. Ambrož C. Frougny Z. Masáková E. Pelantová Abstract For irrational β > 1 we consider the set Fin(β) of real numbers for which x has a finite number
More informationLARGE GAPS BETWEEN CONSECUTIVE PRIME NUMBERS
LARGE GAPS BETWEEN CONSECUTIVE PRIME NUMBERS KEVIN FORD, BEN GREEN, SERGEI KONYAGIN, AND TERENCE TAO ABSTRACT. Let GX) denote the size of the largest gap between consecutive primes below X. Answering a
More informationPROOFS BY DESCENT KEITH CONRAD
PROOFS BY DESCENT KEITH CONRAD As ordinary methods, such as are found in the books, are inadequate to proving such difficult propositions, I discovered at last a most singular method... that I called the
More informationA Survey On Euclidean Number Fields
University of Bordeaux I Department Of Mathematics A Survey On Euclidean Number Fields Author: M.A. Simachew Supervisor: JP. Cerri 2009 University of Bordeaux I Department Of Mathematics A Survey On
More informationSUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS. 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by
SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by g = {g k : k Z}. If G = g, then G itself is cyclic, with g as a generator. Examples
More informationThe number field sieve
The number field sieve A.K. Lenstra Bellcore, 435 South Street, Morristown, NJ 07960 H.W. Lenstra, Jr. Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 M.S. Manasse DEC SRC, 130
More informationTHE ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE PRIME NUMBER THEOREM: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE (by D. Goldfeld)
THE ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE PRIME NUMBER THEOREM: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE (by D. Goldfeld) The study of the distribution of prime numbers has fascinated mathematicians since antiquity. It is only in
More informationELEMENTS OF ANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY
ELEMENTS OF ANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY P. S. Kolesnikov, E. P. Vdovin Lecture course Novosibirsk, Russia 2013 Contents Chapter 1. Algebraic and transcendental numbers 4 1.1. Field of algebraic numbers. Ring
More informationBasic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011
Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely
More informationRegular Languages are Testable with a Constant Number of Queries
Regular Languages are Testable with a Constant Number of Queries Noga Alon Michael Krivelevich Ilan Newman Mario Szegedy Abstract We continue the study of combinatorial property testing, initiated by Goldreich,
More informationTHE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSECUTIVE PRIMES, II
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSECUTIVE PRIMES, II R. C. BAKER, G. HARMAN and J. PINTZ [Received May 000; revised 5 November 000]. Introduction Beginning with Hoheisel [8], many authors have found shorter and
More informationAn Introduction to the NavierStokes InitialBoundary Value Problem
An Introduction to the NavierStokes InitialBoundary Value Problem Giovanni P. Galdi Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Pittsburgh, USA Rechts auf zwei hohen Felsen befinden sich Schlösser,
More information