PUBLIC DEMAND OF INNOVATION FOR: Efficient Public Services and Competitive European Industries & SMEs. Madrid, October 2, 2012

Transcription

1 Success stories in Spanish Innovation Procurement PUBLIC DEMAND OF INNOVATION FOR: Efficient Public Services and Competitive European Industries & SMEs Madrid, October 2, 2012 Miguel Ortiz IPP Coordinator in CDTI Aeronautics, Transport & Security Department Directorate of Global Innovative Markets (02/10/2012)

2 WHAT IS CDTI? Center for the Development of Industrial Technology o Created in 1977 o Public entity (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness) o Business innovation financing agency (LCTI) o Focal point for the promotion of technological innovation o High national and international prestige Enhance Spanish companies competitiveness and internationalization through innovation 2

3 Innovative Public Procurement instruments in Spain INNOCompra User s guide % Target IPP Instruments MAP of demand IPP Help- Desk INNODemanda 3

4 INNODemanda s main facts Synchronizing mechanism between R&D Funding (Supply) and Procurement (Demand) Managed by CDTI through h Fast-track track 6 weeks of evaluation Works with CDTI s financial instruments Minimum R&D budget Tendering process is independent from R&D support Awarded supplier Financed R&D project 4

5 INNODEMANDA scheme Tendering announcement Awarding Procurement Candidates selection Tendering process Tendering evaluation Proposals presentation Finalists CDTI-Procurer Collaboration conditions I+D FUNDING FAST - TRACK I+D Projects presentation CDTI s Council board/president Answer -Funding Scope - CDTI s credit conditions Finalists I+D projects evaluation Contract signature with CDTI 5

6 INNODemanda CASE: ENUSA NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE: OPEN OBJECT Acquire a new NDT inspection equipment based of high efficiency ultrasound technologies to reduce scraps on welding inspection for uranium containers SCHEDULE Tendering announcement: September 21 st October 5 th 2011 Funding Requirement: September 21 st October 5 th 2011 Proposals evaluation: October 5 th November 16 th 2011 Final funding decision: Before November 21 st 2011 Awarding: December 2 nd

7 INNODemanda CASE: ENUSA BENEFITS FOR: PROCURER Integration within existing facilities Cost saving in the inspection process (Minimize scraps ) SUPPLIER New markets opening Advantage over competitors in existing markets Financed R&D to be used in several fields 7

8 INNODemanda CASE: OSAKIDETZA NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE: COMPETITIVE DIALOGUE OBJECT Long term strategy of the Basque government to acquire highly efficient and state of art technology for this kind of patient Design & construction of an ITC platform to support chronic patients treatment CASE I: SCHEDULE Tendering announcement: October 10 th 2010 Funding Requirement: October 14 th November 22 nd 2011 Proposals evaluation: November 23 rd December 23 rd 2011 Final funding decision: Before January 4 th 2012 Awarding: January 30 th 2012 CASE II: SCHEDULE To = Competitive Dialogue starts Tendering announcement: (Estimated 28/05/2012) March 23 rd 2012 Funding Requirement: To+ 30 Proposals evaluation: To+105 Final funding decision: To+120 Awarding: After To+130 8

9 INNODemanda CASE: OSAKIDETZA BENEFITS FOR: PROCURER Acquisition of new technologies in chronic patient treatment Improvement of patient s treatment Foster innovation within local SMEs Achieve world class excellence in the field SUPPLIERS Achieve world class recognition in the area Become a reference in this kind of technology Launching customer to access new markets 9

10 INNODemanda CASE: DGAM NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE: NEGOTIATED WITHOUT ADVERTISING OBJECT Design, development and construction of a mobile 3D radar for the Spanish Army SCHEDULE Tendering announcement: To (January 28 th 2012) Funding Requirement: To +15 Proposals evaluation: To +60 Final funding decision: T1 Awarding: May 31 st

11 INNODemanda CASE: DGAM BENEFITS FOR: PROCURER Acquisition of state-of-the-art technology Improvement of defense capabilities No financial support could mean no procurement SUPPLIER Become a reference in this kind of technology Financed R&D to be used in several fields First (domestic) client - crucial for internationalization in defense sector 11

12 Conclusions & Lessons learned Great interest among enterprises, business associations and platforms (Supply side: Queries ~ 100+ aprox.) Great interest among public entities and procurers. (Analyzed Case Studies: ~ 40+ aprox.) Coordination between Regional/Local Innovation Agencies and State Authorities is fundamental for a good promotion of new concepts and instruments Use of IPP definitely: - Improve public services and lead to gains in efficiency - Foster innovation within the industry 12

13 Thank you for your attention!! Miguel Ortiz Pajares CDTI - Directorate of Global Innovative Markets Innovative Public Procurement Coordinator miguel.ortiz@cdti.es Phone number: