TOWN OF NEW HAVEN ROAD PLAN



Similar documents
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH GUIDELINES

DESCRIPTION OF WORK:

1. It would create hazardous effects of storm water run-off. 3. It would increase hazardous driving conditions on the public road.

City of St. Petersburg Development Services. February Driveways for Residential Properties

ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES. for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

Stop The stop sign, a red octagon with white lettering, means come to a full stop and be sure the way is clear before proceeding.

Section 801 Driveway Access Onto Public Right-of-Ways

SNOW REMOVAL AND ICE CONTROL OPERATIONS MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS

RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS

City of Auburn Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for Curb Ramps, Sidewalks, and Pedestrian Signals ADA TRANSITION PLAN

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

VIII. TRANSPORTATION

PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING THURSDAY APRIL 30, 2015

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA)

Township of Georgian Bluffs POLICY USE OF UNOPENED ROAD ALLOWANCES

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

Roadway Cost Per Centerline Mile Revised June 2014

MONTMORENCY COUNTY. Ordinance No. of 2009

CHAPTER 17: STORM SEWER STANDARDS Introduction Administration Standards 17.1

TRANSPORTATION MODELLING IN CALGARY

CHAPTER 2 TRAFFIC SIGNS AND HIGHWAY MARKINGS

Kirkland Zoning Code

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet

STREET LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION DESIGN CRITERIA

2012 Program Report. Agricultural Group Drainage Program

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

VEHICLE CROSSOVER INFORMATION PACK

COST EFFECTIVE ROAD MAINTENANCE MARCH 2015

H: Road Asset Management Plan February 2015

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

How To Improve Safety

MOBILE HOME LAW. Revised November 2001

COUNTY OF OSCODA. Board of Commissioners Telephone (989) Fax Line (989)

Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010

Characteristics of Different Rural Areas in Thetford

0.0 Curb Radii Guidelines Version 1.0.2

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

5901 Milwaukee Street Planned Unit Development (GDP) (Second Addition to Grandview Commons)

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY. 1. Applicant's Name

VERMONT TRAFFIC MONITORING STANDARDS

Colorado Off-System Bridge Program Description and Guidelines for Selecting Bridges for Rehabilitation or Replacement Funding

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. August 10, 2015 WEST BOYLSTON TOWN HALL, BOARD MEETING ROOM. 140 Worcester Street WEST BOYLSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM

ORDINANCE NO

The Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: May 19, 2015

METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING SAFE SPEEDS ON CURVES


Traffic Volume Counts

Infrastructure assets are distinguished from other capital assets because they normally:

Chapter 162 SHADE TREE COMMISSION

March 17, Dear Mr. Sullins:

Model Subdivision and Land Development (SALDO) Subdivision/ Land Development Presentation Overview. Why Subdivision and Land Development Regulations?

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ACCESSIBILITY TRANSITION PLAN

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

Footpath Extension Policy

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

Pavement Management Implementation: Success Stories for Maryland Counties

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

Virginia Department of Transportation Rural Rustic Road Program Manual

St. Vrain Watershed Master Plan Thursday, January 23 10:00 a.m. 12:15 p.m.

AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

FIBER-OPTIC CABLE PLAN CHECK

Evaluation of the Shared-Use Arrow

Guidelines for. Permeable Pavement

APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION & RIGHT-OF OF-WAY PERMIT

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Site Development Information Worksheet for single family residential development

Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan

Household waste & recycling storage requirements

AREA: 2.37 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF. Single-family, Non-conforming machine shop

APPENDIX G. California Coastal Commission & Conservancy Accessibility Standards

AREA: 0.16 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF

Federal Funds Obligated in Chittenden County Federal Fiscal Year 2000

Welcome to the Inland Wetlands Commission Town of Barkhamsted, CT

SECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE STANDARDS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS

APPENDIX F. RESIDENTIAL WATER QUALITY PLAN: ALLOWABLE BMP OPTIONS

BEST PRACTICES. Smart Transportation is a key concept for the Paoli Roadway Improvement Project.

ASSET MANAGEMENT (A.M.) COUNTY COUNCIL PRESENTATION

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: July 11, 2013

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF BRENTWOOD, TENNESSEE, AS FOLLOWS:

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Clean, Green, Fun! Cady Way. Trail

PROPOSAL FOR HOUSTON COUNTY BAN ON SILICA SAND MINING / PROCESSING ACTIVITY. Introduction and Assumptions

Transcription:

1 TOWN OF NEW HAVEN ROAD PLAN BACKGROUND The Town of New Haven, Vermont consists of 42 square miles of land and a population of approximately 1400 people. At the start of the 21 st century, it is served by 64.3 miles of maintained roads. In addition, there may be between 10 and 20 miles of Class 4 roads/ trails. The latter are not maintained by the Town, nor are their locations or extent documented (see Class 4 Roads below). This plan generally describes the existing road facilities in New Haven, including those over which the State has jurisdiction as well as those controlled by the town. The state and federal governments determine minimum standards and procedures on US 7 and VT 17; the town has jurisdiction over all the town highways. As is customary in Vermont towns, written standards and policies concerning road maintenance and construction are fairly informal. Most are not documented. Instead, local information and experience have governed when decisions about the town s roads are made by responsible parties. This document is intended to provide a slightly more formal framework within which decisions may be made in future. This is expected to be a dynamic plan that will evolve over time. In the future, the town may want to consider adoption of a road ordinance that implements some of the recommendations in this plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing roads in New Haven are classified as follows: Federal Highway System: 7.7 miles of US7 Class 1: 7.2 miles of State Highway (all of which are paved) Class 2: 17.7 miles, 16.2 of which are paved Class 3: 31.8 miles, 10.4 of which are paved Class 4:.26miles (per the official VAOT map) A description of these classifications, as well as additional data concerning New Haven s roads, may be found in the Appendix. On a functional level, these roads are broken down as follows (see Figure 1): Principal/Major Arterial (provides for through movements between areas and direct access to major traffic generators only under controlled situations. US 7 Minor Arterial VT 17 Major Collector (provide for traffic movement between major arterials and local streets and some access to abutting property) River Road Local Roads (provide access to abutting land and for local traffic movements) all others Please refer to Figure 2 for the locations, road names and route numbers of New Haven s roads. High Accident Locations: HALs are sections of roadway or intersections which meet a number of criteria to be designated as such by VTrans. They are not simply areas that are generally acknowledged to have a lot of accidents they must have had a minimum number of

2

3

4 certain types of accidents within a certain amount of time in the recent past. As would be expected, their designation as such is intended to emphasize the need for timely attention at those locations. According to the State s 1990-94 date, the latest available at the turn of the 20 th century, the only HAL within the Town of New Haven consists of a section of VT 17 generally from the Weybridge town line east to just beyond the Hallock Road intersection, including the bridge over Otter Creek. This HAL is given the ninth highest priority in the Statewide ranking based on its Actual/Critical ratio. Efforts to correct this dangerous section of road have not been successful to date. ISSUES Gravel v.s. Paved: There are many arguments for and against paving existing dirt or gravel roads. Most gravel roads are the result of an evolution from animal path to carriage way to vehicular roadway (see Figure 3). Construction of new gravel roads is generally seen as being less expensive than paved roads. At the same time, the life of a paved road is longer and it requires less attention over time. On the gravel roads, the Town loses more gravel every year than the road crews can put down. As an example, 4-5 were lost on Field Days Road in 1999. It has become increasingly difficult to obtain gravel since environmental considerations as well as quality standards have restricted access to the material in the New Haven River. In addition, the maintenance workload is overwhelming the capacity of the town s road crews. Even without additional conversions from gravel to paved roads, it is highly likely that the town s gravel budget will need to be increased. In 1973, New Haven had 41 miles of dirt and gravel roads. By 1999, many of these had been paved and the miles of dirt/gravel roads had been reduced to about 23 miles. Traffic volumes have increased significantly over that time period (see appendix) but the road budget hasn t. The impact of more traffic but not more road money is best illustrated by the wear and tear on gravel roads Because of the variety of opinions about the desirability of paving dirt roads, the decision to pave dirt or gravel roads needs to be based on criteria that are consistently applied throughout the town. A fact sheet titled When to Pave a Gravel Road, put out by the Vermont Local Roads Program, outlines the many considerations that must be dealt with. Some preliminary recommendations are found below. Road Design Standards: It is the intent of this plan to document the minimum design standards that have traditionally been used by the Town of New Haven. The use of standards promotes safety and fosters consistency over time and between projects. New or modified standards may also be recommended for trial use or adoption. The draft town plan says Private roads and easements are often narrow, poorly laid out, poorly constructed and poorly maintained. These difficulties pose problems of access for emergency vehicles and threaten the safety of the residents living on them. Therefore the Town requires private roads accessing minor and major subdivision to be up to State recommended standards for their projected traffic load. Current E-911 standards require naming and numbering of all Town Highways and private roads if they access more than two residences. In all road construction situations, physical circumstances and constraints are important factors when determining the appropriate dimensions of various facilities. Examples of common considerations in New Haven include whether there is ledge or blue clay at or near the construction site, or whether the road is frequently used by farm vehicles. Two local examples of roads that are affected by these

5

6 circumstances are Cobble Road and Twitchell Hill Road. Because of variations in conditions, any standards of road design, construction and maintenance must allow for some flexibility. Class 4 Roads: At the time of writing, there are only.26 miles of Class 4 roads that are officially recognized in the town of New Haven. It is generally believed, however, that there may be between 10 and 20 miles of Class 4 roads and trails that are not identified. Until they have been recognized and documented, there is a potential for future legal problems for the town. Once they have been identified and mapped, a Class 4 road policy and/or management plan should be developed. Access Management: Direct access to highways is accomplished by constructing curb cuts. Access permits are required from the State on state and federal roads, and from the town (Road Foreman, Selectboard and/or Zoning Administrator on town roads. As the number of access points increases, interruptions to the flow of traffic increase. Depending on the function of the particular highway (e.g. a major arterial is intended to carry a high volume of through traffic) such an increase may or may not be appropriate. The potential for accidents also increases with turning movements on or off a highway carrying through traffic. The town desires to limit new curb access to Class 1 and 2 Town Highways in order to reduce the safety problems which additional entries to these higher traffic roads may cause. RECOMMENDED STANDARDS It is intended that new data be incorporated into decision-making about road issues as it becomes available. For example, the Addison County Regional Planning Commission (ACRPC) plans to do traffic counts on various roads in New Haven during the summer of 2000 in order to fill in some existing gaps in information. Please see the Appendix for relevant data. Included in the Appendix is a table labeled Recommended Design Minimums for Local Roads. This document is based on the design standards adopted by the State of Vermont as they may generally apply to the types of roads in the town of New Haven. It is recommended that a trial period be undertaken during which the usefulness and applicability of these standards may be tested as a step toward possible future adoption by the town. All Roads (new and those being repaired): Should all have 2-5 foot wide ditches Base: when rebuilding, they should have a base of: 6 maximum of screened gravel; 12 to 18 of 4 stone; 12 maximum of 1.5 crushed stone The decision to pave a gravel road should, in large part, be based on the issues described in the document titled When to Pave a Gravel Road from the Vermont Local Roads program. Long term considerations such as the cost of maintenance over time and the useful life of different types of road surfaces should be taken into account. The town should consider adoption of a minimum AADT (Annualized Average Daily Traffic) of 400 (??) or more to qualify a gravel road for paving.

7 Gravel Width: 20 Paved Width: 21 foot paved travelway with a 25 foot dirt base. Drainage (Bridges and Culverts): Drainage is one of the most important aspects of road design and maintenance. Water flowing over the surface of the road has significant impacts on the safety of vehicles, and water below the surface (e.g. in the road bed) can substantially shorten the life of a road. It is therefore imperative that water be removed from the roadway as much as possible. An excellent guide outlining measures that address drainage issues is the Vermont Better Backroads Manual, a publication of the George D. Aiken & Northern Vermont Resource Conservation and Development Councils. Normal maintenance procedures in New Haven have traditionally begun with the creation or clearing of ditches, followed by a check of existing culverts. If the culverts look like they won t last 10 years, they are replaced before working on the road. Large culverts, rather than short bridges, are used whenever possible due to their reduced cost and maintenance requirements The sizing of any culvert depends on the amount of stormwater flow that it will be expected to handle. This, in turn, depends on the size of the watershed upstream of the culvert and the surface type (undisturbed forest or open space? farm land? impervious surfaces such as roads or building roofs?) that is existing and is expected in the future. Depending on the location of the culvert and the amount of stormwater flow driveway culverts may be 15 or 18. See Figure 4 for the locations of the town s long (over 20 ) bridges. Note short bridges (6 to 20 ) are not shown, nor are state highway bridges. Bridge maintenance, for instance annual washing, is extremely important in prolonging their lives. STATE ROADS Although the town has no jurisdiction over state roads within its boundaries (to include National Highway System roads such as US 7), the following items are worth noting: The town supports immediate improvements to the section of VT 17 from the Weybridge town line east to just beyond the intersection with Hallock Road. While providing for increased safety, the improvements must also consider the natural and built environment in which they will take place. A planned rehabilitation of US 7 where it is at it narrowest in New Haven (in the vicinity of Campground Road and north) should be undertaken so as to decrease impacts on adjacent residential uses as much as possible.

8

9 FUNDING The town s road budget has remained fairly static over the years despite the fact that traffic volumes (both through- and local- traffic) have increased significantly: The town usually accomplishes 2 miles of new pavement (of gravel roads) and 2 miles of resurfacing each year. In general terms, a typical annual road budget would include: $120,000 for paving and repaving $110,000 for winter road maintenance, and $100,000 from the State for all activities, for an approximate total of $350,000. In order to better accommodate and distribute road expenses, it is recommended that the town develop a Capital Improvement Plan that includes transportation costs and benefits.

10 APPENDIX Town Highway Classifications: The following definitions are contained in the AOT s Orange Book : Class 1 town highways are subject to concurrent responsibility and jurisdiction between the Municipality and the Agency on several matters. The State is responsible for scheduled surface maintenance or resurfacing (19V.S.A. Section 306(a)) while the Municipality is responsible for pot hole patching, crack filling, etc; the State is responsible for center line pavement markings (19 V.S.A. Section 311), while the Municipality is responsible for crosswalks and parking; and there is joint (concurrent) authority on highway protection matters such as obstructing travel, marking of hazards, injuring the highway, installing utilities, etc. (19 V.S.A. Chapter 11). The Agency has exclusive authority to designate Class 1 highways. Class 2 town highways are primarily the responsibility of the Municipality. The State is responsible for center line pavement markings of the Municipality notifies the Agency of the need to replace them (19 V.S.A. Section 311). The Municipality designates highways as Class 2, but approval of the Agency is required (19 V.S.A. Section 302(a)(2)).... Class 2 mileage normally may not exceed 25 percent of the total Class 2 and Class 3 mileage in the Municipality.... Class 3 town highways are the responsibility of the Municipality. The governing body designates which highways are to be Class 3 and therefore maintained for travel by pleasure car during all seasons of the year. All other highways are Class 4 and are the responsibility of the Municipality, including pent roads (public roads that may be gated by permission of the governing body). Some former highways, through legal proceedings, have been designated as legal trails and are not Class 4. 1 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADTs) - all traffic from 4-99 data book Sta.* Route St.Name 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 A013 US7 6900 7100 7100 6700 7000 7000 A041 US7 6500 6500 6300 6300 6100 6200 6000 5900 5700 5300 A103 US7 6700 7700 6700 6700 A104 US7 6900 7000 7400 A140 VT17 780 A141 VT17 1000 1000 1000 960 830 A142 VT17 2500 2300 2300 A322 TH2 RiverRd 1400 1400 1300 A383 TH5 DogTeam 250 A408 TH6 North/Sout 400 500 h A412 TH18 SawyerRd 170 A413 TH24 FieldDays 550 320 A415 TH9 PlankRd 190 A414 TH4 MungerSt 250 A046 T H7 PearsonRd 170 *See Map on following page for locations of the traffic counting stations 1 Highways and Bridges: Handbook for Local Officials, Vermont Agency of Transportation, 1998. Page 16-1.

map of counting stations 11