0 <β 1 let u(x) u(y) kuk u := sup u(x) and [u] β := sup



Similar documents
Metric Spaces. Chapter Metrics

n k=1 k=0 1/k! = e. Example 6.4. The series 1/k 2 converges in R. Indeed, if s n = n then k=1 1/k, then s 2n s n = 1 n

1 Norms and Vector Spaces

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES

BANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW

Notes on metric spaces

MATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties

Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009)

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

Lecture 1: Schur s Unitary Triangularization Theorem

Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

MATH PROBLEMS, WITH SOLUTIONS

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Fixed Point Theorems

Metric Spaces. Lecture Notes and Exercises, Fall M.van den Berg

1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.

MATH 4330/5330, Fourier Analysis Section 11, The Discrete Fourier Transform

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES

No: Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics

Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis

THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE. Contents

Mathematical Induction. Mary Barnes Sue Gordon

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 2. OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES

I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

EXISTENCE AND NON-EXISTENCE RESULTS FOR A NONLINEAR HEAT EQUATION

and s n (x) f(x) for all x and s.t. s n is measurable if f is. REAL ANALYSIS Measures. A (positive) measure on a measurable space

HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS. n!f n (1) lim. ln x n! + xn x. 1 = G n 1 (x). (2) k + 1 n. (n 1)!

Scalar Valued Functions of Several Variables; the Gradient Vector

1. Let P be the space of all polynomials (of one real variable and with real coefficients) with the norm

Fuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability

Introduction to Topology

INCIDENCE-BETWEENNESS GEOMETRY

NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS

1. Let X and Y be normed spaces and let T B(X, Y ).

Practice with Proofs

Follow links for Class Use and other Permissions. For more information send to:

1 Completeness of a Set of Eigenfunctions. Lecturer: Naoki Saito Scribe: Alexander Sheynis/Allen Xue. May 3, The Neumann Boundary Condition

a 11 x 1 + a 12 x a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x a 2n x n = b 2.

Date: April 12, Contents

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

Research Article Stability Analysis for Higher-Order Adjacent Derivative in Parametrized Vector Optimization

4. Expanding dynamical systems

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

CHAPTER IV - BROWNIAN MOTION

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

Solving Linear Systems, Continued and The Inverse of a Matrix

α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

Chapter 5. Banach Spaces

Sample Induction Proofs

Limits and Continuity

Inner Product Spaces

1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1

MATH10040 Chapter 2: Prime and relatively prime numbers

The Ergodic Theorem and randomness

1 = (a 0 + b 0 α) (a m 1 + b m 1 α) 2. for certain elements a 0,..., a m 1, b 0,..., b m 1 of F. Multiplying out, we obtain

MEASURE AND INTEGRATION. Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich

DIFFERENTIABILITY OF COMPLEX FUNCTIONS. Contents

Section 4.4 Inner Product Spaces

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z

Section Inner Products and Norms

Unified Lecture # 4 Vectors

x a x 2 (1 + x 2 ) n.

TOPIC 4: DERIVATIVES

16.3 Fredholm Operators

Math 319 Problem Set #3 Solution 21 February 2002

1 The Brownian bridge construction

Adaptive Online Gradient Descent

CITY UNIVERSITY LONDON. BEng Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part II BSc Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part III PART 2 EXAMINATION

Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis

3. Mathematical Induction

Geometrical Characterization of RN-operators between Locally Convex Vector Spaces

GENTLY KILLING S SPACES TODD EISWORTH, PETER NYIKOS, AND SAHARON SHELAH

Class Meeting # 1: Introduction to PDEs

ALMOST COMMON PRIORS 1. INTRODUCTION

t := maxγ ν subject to ν {0,1,2,...} and f(x c +γ ν d) f(x c )+cγ ν f (x c ;d).

Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan

8 Divisibility and prime numbers

Continuity of the Perron Root

T ( a i x i ) = a i T (x i ).

MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 20: Inner product spaces. Orthogonal sets.

Parabolic Equations. Chapter 5. Contents Well-Posed Initial-Boundary Value Problem Time Irreversibility of the Heat Equation

v w is orthogonal to both v and w. the three vectors v, w and v w form a right-handed set of vectors.

ON SEQUENTIAL CONTINUITY OF COMPOSITION MAPPING. 0. Introduction

10.2 Series and Convergence

Walrasian Demand. u(x) where B(p, w) = {x R n + : p x w}.

NONLOCAL PROBLEMS WITH NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2012

Every Positive Integer is the Sum of Four Squares! (and other exciting problems)

Stochastic Inventory Control

4 Lyapunov Stability Theory

ON NONNEGATIVE SOLUTIONS OF NONLINEAR TWO-POINT BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEMS WITH ADVANCED ARGUMENTS

Modern Optimization Methods for Big Data Problems MATH11146 The University of Edinburgh

6.2 Permutations continued

6 Commutators and the derived series. [x,y] = xyx 1 y 1.

k, then n = p2α 1 1 pα k

Taylor and Maclaurin Series

Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations

Transcription:

456 BRUCE K. DRIVER 24. Hölder Spaces Notation 24.1. Let Ω be an open subset of R d,bc(ω) and BC( Ω) be the bounded continuous functions on Ω and Ω respectively. By identifying f BC( Ω) with f Ω BC(Ω), we will consider BC( Ω) as a subset of BC(Ω). For u BC(Ω) and 0 <β 1 let u(x) u(y) kuk u := sup u(x) and [u] β := sup x Ω x,y Ω x y β. x6=y If [u] β <, then u is Hölder continuous with holder exponent 43 β. The collection of β Hölder continuous function on Ω will be denoted by C 0,β (Ω) :={u BC(Ω) :[u] β < } and for u C 0,β (Ω) let (24.1) kuk C 0,β (Ω) := kuk u +[u] β. Remark 24.2. If u : Ω C and [u] β < for some β>1, then u is constant on each connected component of Ω. Indeed, if x Ω and h R d then u(x + th) u(x) t [u] βt β /t 0 as t 0 which shows h u(x) =0for all x Ω. If y Ω is in the same connected component as x, then by Exercise 17.5 there exists a smooth curve σ :[0, 1] Ω such that σ(0) = x and σ(1) = y. So by the fundamental theorem of calculus and the chain rule, Z 1 Z d 1 u(y) u(x) = 0 dt u(σ(t))dt = 0 dt =0. 0 This is why we do not talk about Hölder spaces with Hölder exponents larger than 1. Lemma 24.3. Suppose u C 1 (Ω) BC(Ω) and i u BC(Ω) for i =1, 2,...,d, then u C 0,1 (Ω), i.e. [u] 1 <. The proof of this lemma is left to the reader as Exercise 24.1. Theorem 24.4. Let Ω be an open subset of R d. Then (1) Under the identification of u BC Ω with u Ω BC (Ω),BC( Ω) is a closed subspace of BC(Ω). (2) Every element u C 0,β (Ω) has a unique extension to a continuous function (still denoted by u) on Ω. Therefore we may identify C 0,β (Ω) with C 0,β ( Ω) BC( Ω). (In particular we may consider C 0,β (Ω) and C 0,β ( Ω) to bethesamewhenβ>0.) (3) The function u C 0,β (Ω) kuk C 0,β (Ω) [0, ) is a norm on C 0,β (Ω) which make C 0,β (Ω) into a Banach space. Proof. 1. The first item is trivial since for u BC( Ω), the sup-norm of u on Ω agrees with the sup-norm on Ω and BC( Ω) is complete in this norm. 43 If β =1,uis is said to be Lipschitz continuous.

ANALYSIS TOOLS WITH APPLICATIONS 457 2. Suppose that [u] β < and x 0 Ω. Let {x n } Ω be a sequence such that x 0 = lim x n. Then u(x n ) u(x m ) [u] β x n x m β 0 as m, n showing {u(x n )} is Cauchy so that ū(x 0) := lim u(x n ) exists. If {y n } Ω is another sequence converging to x 0, then u(x n ) u(y n ) [u] β x n y n β 0 as n, showing ū(x 0 ) is well defined. In this way we define ū(x) for all x Ω and let ū(x) =u(x) for x Ω. Since a similar limiting argument shows ū(x) ū(y) [u] β x y β for all x, y Ω it follows that ū is still continuous and [ū] β =[u] β. In the sequel we will abuse notation and simply denote ū by u. 3. For u, v C 0,β (Ω), v(y)+u(y) v(x) u(x) [v + u] β = sup x,y Ω x y β x6=y v(y) v(x) + u(y) u(x) sup x,y Ω x y β [v] β +[u] β x6=y and for λ C it is easily seen that [λu] β = λ [u] β. This shows [ ] β is a semi-norm on C 0,β (Ω) and therefore k k C 0,β (Ω) defined in Eq. (24.1) is a norm. To see that C 0,β (Ω) is complete, let {u n } be a C0,β (Ω) Cauchy sequence. Since BC( Ω) is complete, there exists u BC( Ω) such that ku u n k u 0 as n. For x, y Ω with x 6= y, u(x) u(y) u n (x) u n (y) x y β = lim x y β lim sup[u n ] β lim ku nk C 0,β (Ω) <, and so we see that u C 0,β (Ω). Similarly, u(x) u n (x) (u(y) u n (y)) (u m u n )(x) (u m u n )(y) x y β = lim m x y β lim sup[u m u n ] β 0 as n, m showing [u u n ] β 0 as n and therefore lim ku u n k C 0,β (Ω) =0. Notation 24.5. Since Ω and Ω are locally compact Hausdorff spaces, we may define C 0 (Ω) and C 0 ( Ω) as in Definition 10.29. We will also let C 0,β 0 (Ω) :=C 0,β (Ω) C 0 (Ω) and C 0,β 0 ( Ω) :=C 0,β (Ω) C 0 ( Ω). It has already been shown in Proposition 10.30 that C 0 (Ω) and C 0 ( Ω) are closed subspaces of BC(Ω) and BC( Ω) respectively. The next proposition describes the relation between C 0 (Ω) and C 0 ( Ω). Proposition 24.6. Each u C 0 (Ω) has a unique extension to a continuous function on Ω given by ū = u on Ω and ū =0on Ω and the extension ū is in C 0 ( Ω). Conversely if u C 0 ( Ω) and u Ω =0, then u Ω C 0 (Ω). In this way we may identify C 0 (Ω) with those u C 0 ( Ω) such that u Ω =0.

458 BRUCE K. DRIVER Proof. Any extension u C 0 (Ω) to an element ū C( Ω) is necessarily unique, since Ω is dense inside Ω. So define ū = u on Ω and ū =0on Ω. We must show ū is continuous on Ω and ū C 0 ( Ω). For the continuity assertion it is enough to show ū is continuous at all points in Ω. For any > 0, by assumption, the set K := {x Ω : u(x) } is a compact subset of Ω. Since Ω = Ω \ Ω, Ω K = and therefore the distance, δ := d(k, Ω), between K and Ω is positive. So if x Ω and y Ω and y x <δ,then ū(x) ū(y) = u(y) < which shows ū : Ω C is continuous. This also shows { ū } = { u } = K is compact in Ω and hence also in Ω. Since >0 was arbitrary, this shows ū C 0 ( Ω). Conversely if uª C 0 ( Ω) such that u Ω = 0 and > 0, then K := x Ω : u(x) is a compact subset of Ω which is contained in Ω since Ω K =. Therefore K is a compact subset of Ω showing u Ω C 0 ( Ω). Definition 24.7. Let Ω be an open subset of R d,k N {0} and β (0, 1]. Let BC k (Ω) (BC k ( Ω)) denote the set of k times continuously differentiable functions u on Ω such that α u BC(Ω) ( α u BC( Ω)) 44 for all α k. Similarly, let BC k,β (Ω) denote those u BC k (Ω) such that [ α u] β < for all α = k. For u BC k (Ω) let kuk C k (Ω) = X k α uk u and α k kuk C k,β (Ω) = X k α uk u + X [ α u] β. α k α =k Theorem 24.8. The spaces BC k (Ω) and BC k,β (Ω) equipped with k k C k (Ω) and k k C k,β (Ω) respectively are Banach spaces and BCk ( Ω) isaclosedsubspaceof BC k (Ω) and BC k,β (Ω) BC k ( Ω). Also C k,β 0 (Ω) =C k,β 0 ( Ω) ={u BC k,β (Ω) : α u C 0 (Ω) α k} is a closed subspace of BC k,β (Ω). Proof. Suppose that {u n } BCk (Ω) is a Cauchy sequence, then { α u n } is a Cauchy sequence in BC(Ω) for α k. Since BC(Ω) is complete, there exists g α BC(Ω) such that lim k α u n g α k u =0for all α k. Letting u := g 0, we must show u C k (Ω) and α u = g α for all α k. This will be done by induction on α. If α = 0 there is nothing to prove. Suppose that we have verified u C l (Ω) and α u = g α for all α l for some l<k.then for x Ω, i {1, 2,...,d} and t R sufficiently small, a u n (x + te i )= a u n (x)+ Letting n in this equation gives a u(x + te i )= a u(x)+ Z t 0 Z t 0 i a u n (x + τe i )dτ. g α+ei (x + τe i )dτ from which it follows that i α u(x) exists for all x Ω and i α u = g α+ei. This completes the induction argument and also the proof that BC k (Ω) is complete. 44 To say α u BC( Ω) means that α u BC(Ω) and α u extends to a continuous function on Ω.

ANALYSIS TOOLS WITH APPLICATIONS 459 It is easy to check that BC k ( Ω) is a closed subspace of BC k (Ω) and by using Exercise 24.1 and Theorem 24.4 that that BC k,β (Ω) is a subspace of BC k ( Ω). The fact that C k,β 0 (Ω) is a closed subspace of BC k,β (Ω) is a consequence of Proposition 10.30. To prove BC k,β (Ω) is complete, let {u n } BCk,β (Ω) be a k k C k,β (Ω) Cauchy sequence. By the completeness of BC k (Ω) just proved, there exists u BC k (Ω) such that lim ku u n k C k (Ω) =0. An application of Theorem 24.4 then shows lim k α u n α uk C 0,β (Ω) =0for α = k and therefore lim ku u n k C k,β (Ω) =0. The reader is asked to supply the proof of the following lemma. Lemma 24.9. The following inclusions hold. For any β [0, 1] BC k+1,0 (Ω) BC k,1 (Ω) BC k,β (Ω) BC k+1,0 ( Ω) BC k,1 ( Ω) BC k,β (Ω). Definition 24.10. Let A : X Y be a bounded operator between two (separable) Banach spaces. Then A is compact if A [B X (0, 1)] is precompact in Y or equivalently for any {x n } X such that kx n k 1 for all n the sequence y n := Ax n Y has a convergent subsequence. Example 24.11. Let X = 2 = Y and λ n C such that lim λ n =0, then A : X Y defined by (Ax)(n) =λ n x(n) is compact. Proof. Suppose {x j } j=1 2 such that kx j k 2 = P x j (n) 2 1 for all j. By Cantor s Diagonalization argument, there exists {j k } {j} such that, for each n, x k (n) =x jk (n) converges to some x(n) C as k. Since for any M <, x(n) 2 = lim x k (n) 2 1 k P we may conclude that x(n) 2 1, i.e. x 2. Let y k := A x k and y := A x. We will finish the verification of this example by showing y k y in 2 as k. Indeed if λ M =max λ n, then n M X ka x k A xk 2 = λ n 2 x k (n) x(n) 2 = X λ n 2 x k (n) x(n) 2 + λ M 2 x k (n) x(n) 2 M+1 λ n 2 x k (n) x(n) 2 + λ M 2 k x k xk 2 λ n 2 x k (n) x(n) 2 +4 λ M 2. Passing to the limit in this inequality then implies lim sup ka x k A xk 2 4 λ M 2 0 as M. k

460 BRUCE K. DRIVER Lemma 24.12. If X A Y B Z are continuous operators such the either A or B is compact then the composition BA : X Z is also compact. Proof. If A is compact and B is bounded, then BA(B X (0, 1)) B(AB X (0, 1)) which is compact since the image of compact sets under continuous maps are compact. Hence we conclude that BA(B X (0, 1)) is compact, being the closed subset of the compact set B(AB X (0, 1)). If A is continuos and B is compact, then A(B X (0, 1)) is a bounded set and so by the compactness of B, BA(B X (0, 1)) is a precompact subset of Z, i.e. BA is compact. Proposition 24.13. Let Ω o R d such that Ω is compact and 0 α<β 1. Then the inclusion map i : C β (Ω) C α (Ω) is compact. Let {u n } C β (Ω) such that ku n k C β 1, i.e. ku n k 1 and u n (x) u n (y) x y β for all x, y Ω. By Arzela-Ascoli, there exists a subsequence of {ũ n } of {u n } and u C o ( Ω) such that ũ n u in C 0. Since u(x) u(y) = lim ũ n(x) ũ n (y) x y β, u C β as well. Define g n := u ũ n C β, then [g n ] β + kg n k C 0 = kg n k C β 2 and g n 0 in C 0. To finish the proof we must show that g n 0 in C α. Given δ>0, g n (x) g n (y) [g n ] α =sup x6=y x y α A n + B n where gn (x) g n (y) A n =sup x y α : x 6= y and x y δ gn (x) g n (y) =sup x y β x y β α : x 6= y and x y δ δ β α [g n ] β 2δ β α and gn (x) g n (y) B n =sup x y α : x y >δ 2δ α kg n k C 0 0 as n. Therefore, lim sup [g n ] α lim sup A n + lim sup B n 2δ β α +0 0 as δ 0. This proposition generalizes to the following theorem which the reader is asked to proveinexercise24.2below. Theorem 24.14. Let Ω be a precompact open subset of R d,α,β [0, 1] and k, j N 0. If j + β>k+ α, then C j,β Ω is compactly contained in C k,α Ω.

ANALYSIS TOOLS WITH APPLICATIONS 461 24.1. Exercises. Exercise 24.1. Prove Lemma 24.3. Exercise 24.2. Prove Theorem 24.14. Hint: First prove C j,β Ω @@ C j,α Ω is compact if 0 α<β 1. Then use Lemma 24.12 repeatedly to handle all of the other cases.