Wyoming State Capitol Building Restoration and Modernization



Similar documents
NC Rehab Code Case Study Cheerwine Building January 17, 2002; rev 4/12/02

ON MOST schemes, the architectural design of. Flexible strategy. Case study. The Forum

Building Codes Update: The 2009 International Fire Code and the Apartment Industry

New Ontario Building Code Requirements for Mid-rise Wood Frame Buildings

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

BUILDING INSPECTORS INSPECTION FORM FOR CHILD CARE CENTERS

FIRE PREVENTION DEPARTMENT. CONTAINMENT/RESTORATION UCDHS ILSM Procedure For Water Damage Repair

Design Options (Tradeoffs) Allowed by the 2012 Building Codes for Properties with Sprinkler Systems. April 2013

Construction Warehouse. Culminating Experience in Fire Protection Engineering FPE 596 Prepared by Ben Johnson

SCHOOL FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY INSPECTION CHECKLIST

Code Requirements for Existing Buildings

SECTION 903 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS

NMSU FIRE DEPARTMENT Commercial Kitchen Fire Suppression Worksheet

Pearl River Tower, Guangzhou: Fire Protection Strategies for an Energy Efficient High-Rise Building

FIRE LOSS STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN RELATING FAILURE AND BUILDING DAMAGE TO THE BUILDING CODE OBJECTIVES

CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Hazard & Prevention Services

Educational. Educational-Existing 1/28/2014. OCCUPANT LOADS [no change] Application. Application

Name Of Occupancy Date. Yes No Describe

FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT

Page 4 of 17. Committee Input NFPA 101 Coordinate Smoke detector versus smoke alarm terminology.

CHAPTER 9 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

How To Write A Fire Risk Assessment

Fraternity and Sorority House Fire Safety

Comparison of the Structural Provisions in the International Existing Building Code 2012 versus the Rhode Island State Rehabilitation Code

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Department of Fire Services

Classroom Door Security & Locking Hardware

General Safety & Health Standards Published by the Division of Building Safety In Cooperation with the Idaho Industrial Commission

How To Check If A Building Is Safe For A Disabled Person

Practice Note

Fire Barriers & Fire Stopping

ICC CODE CORNER 2012 IFC Code & Commentary

M E M O R A N D U M. To: Partnership for Safer Buildings Date: 21 March 2003

FIRE SAFETY SELF-INSPECTION FORM FOR CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS. 1. All Floors (inspect from top floor to basement): Yes No

Fire Risk in Metro Tunnels and Stations

Appraisal of Passive and Active Fire Protection Systems in Student s Accommodation

Requirements for Hydrogen Storage and Use

MINNESOTA STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

A Code Review for Emergency Generators and Indoor Use of Portable Generators

2007 ICC FINAL ACTION AGENDA

NFPA SELECT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

Errata has been identified as follows:

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Environment of Care Manual

Fire Alarm Systems Requirements by Occupancy Type

EVACUATION & LIFE SAFETY STRATEGIES FOR SUPER HIGH RISE BUILDINGS. Sam Aloi, Grad. Dip. (Fire Safety & Risk Eng.)VUT Melb, BE (Building) VUT Melb.

2012 IBC & 2012 NFPA 101 Significant Means of Egress Changes. Questions Design Occupant Load Means of Egress Capacity Determination

New York City Department of Buildings

SMOKE ALARMS CLASS 1A BUILDINGS

Life Safety Code Enabling References

Excerpts from the Canadian National Building Code (NBC)

Improving fire safety through engineering (rational designs)

LOUISVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 895 West Via Appia, Louisville, Colorado

Walking and Working Surface Checklist:

FIRE SAFETY SELF-INSPECTION FORM FOR CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS

New Ontario Building Code Highlights

Area of Rescue Assistance Communication System ADA Code Applicable excerpts:

Certification: Building Plans Examiner. Exam ID: B3

UCL FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT POLICY& ARRANGEMENTS

FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONS, TRADE SHOWS AND EXHIBITS

MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS

NFPA Frequently Asked Questions

build safe live safe

Facility Assessment for East Main Street, Huntley, IL

17,280 square feet Overview:

Sam Docknevich, PSP, Security Service Portfolio Manager. Are You Prepared? The impending impact of Code on Servicing Security Systems

SPECIFIC GUIDANCE FOR A HOUSE IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION (HMO) CONVERTED ENTIRELY INTO SELF CONTAINED FLATS

NEW SCIENCE FIRE SAFETY ARTICLE INNOVATING FIRE ATTACK TACTICS SUMMER 2013 UL.COM/NEWSCIENCE

Amendments to the 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE

ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY OSHA REGULATION: 29 CFR WELDING, CUTTING, AND BRAZING ( HOT WORK ) SECTION: 3600

Appendix B Florida Building Code Building Section Public Shelter Design Criteria

Building Code Clarifications - 7. Fire Resistance

Development of Seismic-induced Fire Risk Assessment Method for a Building

KITCHEN AND BATH REMODELING BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

Pollution CO CO 2. Carbonaceo us soot H 2 S, NOX, SO2

Medicine Hat Fire Department. Special Event Requirements. medicinehat.ca/fire. August 2012

MINNESOTA STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Instructions for Obtaining a Certificate of Smoke Detector, Carbon Monoxide Alarm, and Kitchen Fire Extinguisher Compliance

Grasshoppers Rugby Football Sports and Social Club. The Fire Risk Assessment

DCSS (ACB) Data Center Fire Suppression Procedures

Building evacuation, rules and reality

Emergency Evacuation Plan: 232 King St.

Code Compliance Guideline: Swimming Pool Chemicals

HOUSING QUALITY STANDARDS (HQS)

ALBERTA FIRE CODE SAFETY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS

MEANS OF EXIT / ESCAPE / EGRESS SELF INSPECTION CHECKLIST

BUILDING PERMIT SPECIFICATIONS

FIRE SAFETY ONLINE TRAINING

TYPICAL FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION VIOLATIONS

2012 CODES SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 2012 IBC

LIFE SAFETY UPDATE. FULL SPRINKLERING OF ALL NURSING FACILITIES ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATIONS Prepared by Eric Rosenbaum, P.E. Hughes Associates, Inc.

HOT WORK PERMIT PROGRAM TRAINING. John Braun

CBD-233. Fire Alarm and Detection Systems

Indiana Building Rehabilitation Standard

FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FOR CONVENTIONS, TRADE SHOWS AND EXHIBITS November 2011

Overview of Hotel Fire Safety Requirements

Transcription:

Wyoming State Capitol Building Restoration and Modernization Level I / II Life Safety and Fire Protection Assessment 25 September 2013

Presentation Overview Project Overview Applicable Codes Non-Conformance Issues Evaluation Criteria Engineering Analysis Findings Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 2

Project Overview Level I / II Life Safety & Fire Protection Assessment Identify matters of non-conformance with building and fire codes Identify strategies to achieve code conformance Improve overall building fire safety Respectful of the building s historic fabric Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 3

Applicable Codes Wyoming State Building and Fire Code 2012 ICC International Building Code (IBC) 2012 ICC International Existing Building Code (IEBC) 2012 ICC International Fire Code (IFC) NFPA 914, Code for Fire Protection of Historic Structures, 2010 edition IEBC and IBC do not provide a comprehensive method for assessing fire safety in historic structures Framework for quantifying overall life safety and protecting property and heritage Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 4

Non-Compliance Issues Fire containment and building compartmentalization Combustible building construction materials in the attic spaces Fire suppression and control Means of egress Fire alarm Monumental stair handrails Rotunda guards Exit signage / way finding Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 5

Non-Compliance Issues: Focus Engineering Analysis Fire containment and building compartmentalization Combustible building construction materials in the attic spaces Fire suppression and control Means of egress Fire alarm Monumental stair handrails Rotunda guards Exit signage / way finding Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 6

Evaluation Criteria Determine Required Safety Egress Time (RSET) in a fire emergency Determine Available Safety Egress Time (ASET) in a fire emergency Time where tenable conditions can be maintained for safe occupant evacuation Life safety is achieved when ASET exceeds RSET Available Safe Egress Time (ASET) Required Safe Egress Time (RSET) Margin of Safety t d t a t i t mov Detection Time Alarm Time Decision & Action Time Evacuation Time Pre-movement Time Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 7

Evaluation Criteria: Fire Scenarios NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Performance-Based Option was used to identify probable building fire scenarios 1. Typical fire for the occupancy 2. Ultrafast-developing fire that makes one of the exits impassable 3. Fire in a normally unoccupied room 4. Fire in a concealed wall/ceiling space adjacent to a large occupied room 5. Slowly developing fire shielded from fire protection systems 6. Most severe fire resulting from the largest possible fuel load 7. Outside exposure fire 8. Fire where the fire protection systems are rendered ineffective Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 8

Evaluation Criteria: Fire Scenarios NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Performance-Based Option was used to identify probable building fire scenarios 1. Typical fire for the occupancy 2. Ultrafast-developing fire that makes one of the exits impassable 3. Fire in a normally unoccupied room. 4. Fire in a concealed wall / ceiling space adjacent to a large occupied room. 5. Slowly developing fire shielded from fire protection systems. 6. Most severe fire resulting from the largest possible fuel load 7. Outside exposure fire. 8. Fire where the fire protection systems are rendered ineffective. Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 9

Engineering Analysis: RSET Computational evacuation modeling Determine time required for building evacuation Analysis assumes building population 1,214 persons Actual population is significantly less Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 10

Engineering Analysis: ASET Fire modeling analysis Determine smoke spread, maintain safe conditions for evacuation Evaluate protection strategies to mitigate fire hazard and fire risk Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 11

Findings Tenable conditions cannot be maintained in the existing building. Chambers large occupant load causes queuing at the stairs on Floors 2 and 3 exposing the occupants to smoke spread from the chamber fire. Mechanical smoke control system is required to maintain tenable conditions for occupant evacuation. Open monumental stairs and Rotunda enhance smoke control. Christmas tree is the most severe fire. ASET exceeds RSET in all fire scenarios with enhanced fire protection systems except the Christmas tree scenario. Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 12

RSET General Parameters The following slides reflect evacuation modeling results including written narrative followed by evacuation simulation video. General parameters for the simulations are as follows: Simulations are not in real time. Time is shown in BOLD at upper left of simulation To play video click image on screen Videos show evacuation time only, no delay is incorporated for premovement Occupants are permitted to choose between any available exit. Simulations are shown as examples of people movement; actual times and results vary based on scenario. Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 13

2 nd Floor Evacuation Two Stairs Available This simulation reflects evacuation from the second floor when all exits are available including both monumental stairs Observations from simulation are as follows: Queuing is observed leaving the Chambers as early as 5 seconds into the simulation Closest occupants reach monumental stairs within 10 seconds and queuing begins at stairs to exit floor By 20 seconds, a large group of people has congregated at each of the stairs, as stair travel is a limiting factor in evacuation speeds By 130 seconds (2 minutes), all occupants have reached the stair queues By 190 seconds (3 minutes), one stair has cleared and occupants choose to leave their queue and travel to open stair By 240 seconds (4 minutes), occupants have evacuated the second floor Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 14

2 nd Floor Evacuation Two Stairs Available Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 15

All Floors Evacuation Two Stairs Available This simulation shows a section of the building during evacuation when all exits are available. Observations from simulation are as follows: Within 5 seconds, vertical travel down the stairs can be observed Within 45 seconds, most occupants have reached an exit access stair queue Within 60 seconds (1 minute) all basement occupants have left the floor By 240 seconds (4 minutes) occupants have left the third floor and are congregated at exits from the second and first floors By 420 seconds (7 minutes), occupants have left the second floor By 450 seconds (7.5 minutes), all occupants have left the building Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 16

All Floors Evacuation Two Stairs Available Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 17

All Floors Evacuation One Stair Blocked This simulation shows a section of the building during evacuation when one stair from Level 2 to Level 1 is blocked. Observations from simulation are as follows: Within 5 seconds, vertical travel down the stairs can be observed Within 45 seconds, most occupants have reached an exit access stair queue Within 60 seconds (1 minute) all basement occupants have left the floor By 240 seconds (4 minutes) occupants have left the third floor and are congregated at exits from the second and first floors Large groups of occupants are observed on the second floor as only one of the two stairs are available for egress. By 420 seconds (7 minutes), occupants have left the second floor By 450 seconds (7.5 minutes), all occupants have left the building Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 18

All Floors Evacuation One Stair Blocked Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 19

ASET: General Parameters The following slides reflect fire modeling results including written narrative followed by modeling simulation video. General parameters for the simulations are as follows: Simulations are not in real time play is increased. Time is shown at lower left in simulation Fire starts at time = 0 Simulation runs 1200s (20 min) To play video click image on screen Scale at right hand side of simulation shows visibility in meters Blue indicates high visibility 30 m (100 ft) or greater Red indicates low visibility 10 m (30 ft) or less Smoke exhaust, where presents, initiates at approximately 2 min Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 20

ASET: House Fire No Smoke Control This simulation reflects the previously described design fire within the House Chambers with no Smoke Exhaust in building Observations are as follows: At 240s (4 min) smoke has spread into outer rooms into the corridor on the third floor At 360s (6 min) smoke has banked down within east portion of the corridor on the third floor is spilling into Rotunda At 460s (7.5 min) smoke has spread to west portion of the corridor By 720s (12 min) the smoke layer has descended within the Rotunda space to the corridors on the second floor By 780s (13 min) smoke has filled the third floor of the Senate Chamber By 1200s (20 min) smoke has spread throughout the remainder of the second floor Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 21

ASET: House Fire No Smoke Control Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 22

ASET: House Fire Smoke Control This simulation reflects the previously described design fire within the House Chambers with Smoke Exhaust in building Observations are as follows: At 320s (5.5 min) smoke has spread from the Chamber and outer rooms into the corridor on the third floor From 450s until 1140s (7.5 min to 19 min), smoke banks down to less than 6 feet above a portion of the east corridor intermittently. No other smoke spread is experienced. With smoke exhaust, smoke is contained to the area of origin (House chambers) and immediate surrounding spaces with little to no impact on means of egress for other building occupants Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 23

ASET: House Fire Smoke Control Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 24

ASET: Stair Fire No Smoke Control This simulation reflects the previously described design fire at the base of the stair with no Smoke Exhaust in building Observations are as follows: At 90s (1.5 min) smoke has spread from the stair throughout east portion of the corridors and Rotunda on the first through third levels. At 180s (3 min) smoke has filled the Rotunda and adjacent corridors on the second and third floors At 240s (4 min) smoke has spread through the ante rooms and enters the Senate and House Chambers on the third floor By 390s (6.5 min) smoke has descended to corridors on the first floor By 930s (15.5 min) smoke has spread throughout the first floor and descended within both Chambers to the second floor Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 25

ASET: Stair Fire No Smoke Control Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 26

ASET: Stair Fire No Smoke Control This simulation reflects the previously described design fire at the base of the stair with Smoke Exhaust in building Observations are as follows: At 180s (3 min) smoke has spread through the third floor within the Rotunda and portions of the first floor on the east side of the Rotunda At 270s (4.5 min) smoke has been exhausted from the majority of the third floor, increasing visibility conditions to greater than 30 feet. From 270s to 690s (4.5 min to 11.5 min) visibility conditions fluctuate within area of origin. Portions of second and first floor have visibility conditions less than 30 feet intermittently. Other portions of building remain clear. After 690s (11.5 min) visibility greater than 30 feet is constant throughout the building. Smoke is shown at the fire, but is quickly exhausted from the space and does not spread to any other portion of the building. Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 27

ASET: Stair Fire Smoke Control Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corporation 28

Moving Forward Acceptance of Approach NFPA 914 strategy Performance-based analysis for determining tenability Design fire scenario selection Modeling tools Further refinement of results Exhaust locations and capacities Make-up air locations Occupant load calculations Aon Risk Solutions Global Risk Consulting Fire Protection Engineering 29