Recent Advances in Pixel Localization Accuracy



Similar documents
GPS Precise Point Positioning as a Method to Evaluate Global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model

TerraSAR-X Interferometry. Michael Eineder, Nico Adam Remote Sensing Technology Institute

German Antarctic Receiving Station GARS O Higgins: Remote sensing as core for a broader range of activities

How To Monitor Sea Level With Satellite Radar

Radar interferometric techniques and data validation Terrafirma Essen, March Page 1

TerraSAR-X capabilities and constrains for acquisitions over the polar regions. Dana Floricioiu

Günter Seeber. Satellite Geodesy 2nd completely revised and extended edition

Satellites for Terrain Motion Mapping Terrafirma User Workshop Mining. Nico Adam

European Geodetic Status European Geodetic Reference Systems

The IGS: A Multi-GNSS Service

Wide Area Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: Algorithms and Examples

Terrafirma Persistent Scatterer Processing Validation

GNSS and Heighting, Practical Considerations. A Parker National Geo-spatial Information Department of Rural Development and Land Reform

TerraSAR-X Products Tips and Tricks

Evolving a new Geodetic Positioning Framework: An Australian Perspective

TerraSAR X and TanDEM X satellite missions update & other activities Dana Floricioiu German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology

Cluster Applied Remote Sensing TerraSAR-X Ground Segment Basic Product Specification Document. Ground Segment. Basic Product Specif ication Document

Case Study Australia. Dr John Dawson A/g Branch Head Geodesy and Seismic Monitoring Geoscience Australia. Chair UN-GGIM-AP WG1 Chair APREF.

The NASA Global Differential GPS System (GDGPS) and The TDRSS Augmentation Service for Satellites (TASS)

Status and Development of the European Height Systems

GNSS Reflectometry at GFZ: ocean altimetry and land surface monitoring

The DLR Multi Mission EO Ground Segment

HIGH RESOLUTION MONITORING OF CAMPI FLEGREI (NAPLES, ITALY) BY EXPLOITING TERRASAR-X DATA: AN APPLICATION TO SOLFATARA CRATER

Laser Ranging to Nano-Satellites

The Moon. Nicola Loaring, SAAO

Time and frequency distribution using satellites

High Resolution 3D Earth Observation Data Analysis for Safeguards Activities

On May 27, 2010, the U.S. Air. Satellite. Antenna Phase Center and Attitude Modeling

Ionospheric Research with the LOFAR Telescope

Marine route optimization. Jens Olaf Pepke Pedersen Polar DTU / DTU Space

CDMA Technology : Pr. S. Flament Pr. Dr. W. sk On line Course on CDMA Technology

CORS/OPUS: Status & Future Prospects

How To Write A Call To Action For Terrasar-X

Non-parametric estimation of seasonal variations in GNSS-derived time series

TerraSAR-X Image Product Guide. Basic and Enhanced Radar Satellite Imagery. Airbus Defence and Space Geo-Intelligence Programme Line

Guideline for Control Surveys by Differential Levelling

Examination Space Missions and Applications I (AE2103) Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Delft University of Technology SAMPLE EXAM

The Use and Integrity Monitoring of IGS Products at Geoscience Australia (GA)

Traffic Monitoring Systems. Technology and sensors

Interferometric TOPS Chain Description

Jason-2 GDR Quality Assessment Report. Cycle / M. Ablain, CLS. P. Thibaut, CLS

POTENTIALS OF HIGH RESOLUTION TERRASAR-X IMAGES IN INSAR PROCESSING

European Position Determination System. Guideline for EUPOS Reference Frame Fixing

Monitoring a Changing Environment with Synthetic Aperture Radar. Alaska Satellite Facility National Park Service Don Atwood

WHAT YOU NEED TO USE THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEMS

STUDY OF IONOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON AZIMUTH IMAGING FOR MEDIUM-EARTH-ORBIT SAR

Information Contents of High Resolution Satellite Images

European Petroleum Survey Group EPSG. Guidance Note Number 10. April Geodetic Transformations Offshore Norway

CryoSat Product Handbook

German Earth Observation Systems and Programs Capacities for nation building

Sentinel-1 Mission Overview

GPS Precise Point Positioning with a Difference*

Synthetic Aperture Radar: Principles and Applications of AI in Automatic Target Recognition

Perspective of Permanent Reference Network KOPOS in Kosova

What causes Tides? If tidal forces were based only on mass, the Sun should have a tidegenerating

Local monitoring by low cost devices and free and open sources softwares

Trimble CenterPoint RTX Post-Processing Services FAQs

Comparison of ALOS-PALSAR and TerraSAR-X Data in terms of Detecting Settlements First Results

AUTOMATED OPERATIONAL MULTI-TRACKING HIGH PRECISION ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR LEO MISSIONS

Satellite Posi+oning. Lecture 5: Satellite Orbits. Jan Johansson Chalmers University of Technology, 2013

Space Environment and Satellite Systems: Removing Clutter from Ground-to-Satellite Signals. Sigrid Close

Surveying & Positioning Guidance note 10

Wind Field Observations with a Monostatic and Bistatic C-band Doppler Radar Network

SARscape 4.3 Supported Sensors/Products (March 2011) - Spaceborne Sensors -

GGOS Bureau for Networks and Commuications Michael Pearlman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge MA USA

Satellite Altimetry Missions

Prediction of Storm Surge using Space Data. Susanne Lehner German Aerospace Center

A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPRAOCH FOR AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT USING CONVENTIONAL CCTV CAMERA

LANDSAT 8 Level 1 Product Performance

Two primary advantages of radars: all-weather and day /night imaging

Vorstellung eines photogrammetrischen Kamerasystems für UAVs mit hochgenauer GNSS/INS Information für standardisierte Verarbeitungsverfahren

Solar Tracking Controller

SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle

PI: Riccardo Lanari (IREA CNR)

Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Missions Employing Formation Flying

Full credit for this chapter to Prof. Leonard Bachman of the University of Houston

Astronomical applications of the over-the-horizon radar NOSTRADAMUS

Pacific Sea Level Monitoring Project

ESCI 107/109 The Atmosphere Lesson 2 Solar and Terrestrial Radiation

Prospects for an Improved Lense-Thirring Test with SLR and the GRACE Gravity Mission

4.12 Improving wind profiler data recovery in non-uniform precipitation using a modified consensus algorithm

Introduction into Real-Time Network Adjustment with Geo++ GNSMART

Why do we need to improve co-locations of space geodetic techniques?

Alexandru Csete (Rovsing A/S) 3. International Workshop on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques ESTEC, October 2-5, 2006

New Space Capabilities for Maritime Surveillance

GNSS satellite attitude characteristics during eclipse season

The ecliptic - Earth s orbital plane

Введение в спутниковую радиолокацию: Радиолокаторы с синтезированной апертурой (РСА) Introduction to satellite radars: Synthetic Aperture Radars (SAR)

Jason-2 GDR Quality Assessment Report. Cycle / S. Philipps, CLS. M. Ablain, CLS. P. Thibaut, CLS

Assessing Cloud Spatial and Vertical Distribution with Infrared Cloud Analyzer

TRIMBLE ATS TOTAL STATION ADVANCED TRACKING SYSTEMS FOR HIGH-PRECISION CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

Robot Perception Continued

Transcription:

Recent Advances in Pixel Localization Accuracy U. Balss, X. Cong, M. Eineder, H. Breit, T. Fritz, B. Schättler Remote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF) German Aerospace Center (DLR)

Outline Operational TerraSAR-X Absolute Pixel Localization Requirement and Achievement Submeter Accuracy Influences Ionosphere and Troposphere Earth Tides Reference Frames and Continental Drift TerraSAR-X Absolute Accuracy Bistatic TanDEM-X Relative Accuracies High-Resolution Image Cross-Correlation Application Demonstrations Conclusion and Outlook Folie 2 2

TerraSAR-X Pixel Localization Accuracy Pre-Launch Requirement Definition Pixel localization accuracy defines how accurate a pixel in a TerraSAR-X basic product can be transformed to a ground position Requirement 2 m for complex products (SSC) assuming GPS orbit determination accuracy is major driver rapid orbit requirement: 2 m (3D, 1 sigma) science orbit requirement: 20 cm (3D, 1 sigma), aiming at 10 cm SAR timing in range and azimuth precise enough application of an approximate constant value for atmospheric delays (properly mapped to scene average height and incidence angle) TerraSAR-X Basic Product Specification TX-GS-DD-3302 Folie 3 3

TerraSAR-X Pixel Localization Accuracy Measurements in 2007 (Commissioning Phase) Orbit Determination Accuracy rapid orbit: 20 cm (TOR IGOR GPS with JPL real-time GPS RTG) science orbit: < 10 cm (TOR IGOR GPS with CODE from Univ. of Bern) Pixel Localization Accuracy geometric calibration result: 0.5 m azimuth, 0.3 m range (1 σ) requirement tightened to 1 m absolute for all imaging modes based on science orbits including all uncertainties on the signal path and along-track (azimuth) errors Pixel Localization Measurement Method corner reflectors (different beams, angles) with precise GPS coordinates Oberpfaffenhofen test site with 6 corner reflectors compare point target peak locations against predicted point target location in SSC products TerraSAR-X Basic Product Specification TX-GS-DD-3302 IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol 48, No. 2, Feb. 2010 (Special Issue on TerraSAR-X: Mission, Calibration, and First Results) Folie 4 4

Product Range Times Annotation Philosophy two-way radar pulse traveling time referring to zero Doppler location corrected for known instrument internal delays as annotated in the IOCS auxiliary product (calibration result) not corrected for atmospheric influences additional constant slant range delays annotated to correct for - average hydrostatic delay by troposphere (a few m) - ionospheric delay (a few cm) see element signalpropagationeffects in GEOREF.xml: <rangedelay modelname="averagetecu_5" modelversion="1.0" source="iono"> <validityrangemin>3.62844005102856996e-03</validityrangemin> <validityrangemax>3.65775221316062740e-03</validityrangemax> <referencepoint>3.64309613209459846e-03</referencepoint> <polynomialdegree>0</polynomialdegree> <coefficient exponent="0">1.54228486505132483e-10</coefficient> </rangedelay> <rangedelay modelname="hydrostatic" modelversion="1.0" source="atmos"> <validityrangemin>3.62844005102856996e-03</validityrangemin> <validityrangemax>3.65775221316062740e-03</validityrangemax> <referencepoint>3.64309613209459846e-03</referencepoint> <polynomialdegree>0</polynomialdegree> <coefficient exponent="0">1.64512872009106978e-08</coefficient> </rangedelay> Folie 5 5

Product Azimuth Times Annotation Philosophy given in UTC and GPS refering to zero Doppler location not corrected for a systematic azimuth shift determined during geometric calibration, but not accountable to an instrument (either SAR or GPS) source geometric calibration measurements: average azimuth time offset t shift = -0.18 msec ~ -1.2 m annotated as additional constant delay in azimuth see element signalpropagationeffects in GEOREF.xml: <azimuthshift modelname="external azimuth time shift" modelversion="1.0" source="timing"> <validityrangemin>3.85752271532445890e-03</validityrangeminz <validityrangemax>3.89188252702577474e-03</validityrangemax> <referencepoint>3.87470262117511682e-03</referencepoint> <polynomialdegree>0</polynomialdegree> <coefficient exponent="0">-1.80000000000000011e-04</coefficient> </azimuthshift> source of azimuth time shift? Folie 6 6

TerraSAR-X SAR System Update Spring 2010 preparation of TSX recalibration campaign in spring 2010 and TDX commissioning SAR processor TMSP update: new version 4.5 refinement of stop/go approximation previous: from PRI event to PRI event now: also within focussed range line (more precise zero Doppler azimuth time) IOCS Auxiliary Product Update: new version 004.002 Change of azimuth delay / azimuth shift from -180 microsec (~1.2 m) to -47.1 microsec (~ 0.3 m) to fit the TMSP approximations Folie 7 7

Follow-On Systematic Assessment of Submeter Influences Unprecedented high pixel localization accuracy of TerraSAR-X allows a systematic assessment of submeter accuracy influences Imaging Geodesy Toward Centimeter-Level Ranging Accuracy With TerraSAR-X, Eineder et al (DLR), IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol 49, No. 2, Feb. 2011 Discussed Range Influence Factors range sampling frequency accuracy / stability signal propagation: ionosphere and troposphere Earth tides Folie 8 8

Atmospheric Influences Ionosphere frequency-dependant phase advance and group delay group delay determination from VTEC (vertical total electron content) typical VTEC values: 5 10 TECU (total electron content unit) zenith (0º inc. angle) delay caused by moderate 5 TECUs Beware: zenith delay of 0.0216 m - properly mapped to scene incidence angle - assumed and annotated in TerraSAR-X products sources for VTEC values ground-based GNSS networks space-based radio occultation measurements Folie 9 9

Atmospheric Influences - Troposphere frequency-independant signal delays larger hydrostatic (dry gases) ~ 2.3 m at sea level, modeled from known altitude and pressure smaller wet delay (precipitable water vapor) up to 0.4 m sources for actual delay values ground-based GNSS measurements see e.g. Regional Reference Frame Sub-Commission for Europe (EUREF) permanent network space-based water vapor measurements static model (2.0 m assumed for sea level) used and annotated appropriately applied for current average scene height and mapped to incidence angle - in TerraSAR-X products Folie 10 10

Zenith Path Delay from EUREF Permanent GPS Network around 202 permanent GPS stations in Europe ZDP measurements on station height temporal resolution: 30 min however: sparse location on a global basis Wettzell, Bad Kötzting, Germany (WTZR) Folie 11 11

Path Delay from Numerical Weather Model Data ERA-Interim reanalysis from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Horizontal resolution: full T255 spectral truncation (grid size ~80 km) Available on 0h, 06h, 12h and 18h, since 1989 to current 3 months p atmo p i p 0 Folie 12 12

Comparison GPS ZDP with ECMWF STD 27.38 STD 29.81 STD 31.90 STD 28.67 STD 32.63 STD 31.69 STD 34.89 STD 33.72 STD 34.86 STD 33.53 STD 8.7 STD 12.9 STD 7.7 STD 13.0 STD 13.0 Validation of Centimeter-Level SAR Geolocation Accuracy after Correction for Atmospheric Delay using ECMWF Weather Data, Cong et al (TUM and DLR), Fringe 2011 Workshop (Sep), Frascati Folie 13 13

Earth Tides solid earth tides caused by Earth deformations due to gravitational forces of Sun and Moon radial: up to 40 cm, horizontal: a few cm pole tides caused by changes in Earth s rotational axis due to polar motion radial: up to 2.5 cm, horizontal: less than 1 cm tidal ocean loading caused by tidal changes of mass distributions of oceans radial: up to several cm near coast, < 1 cm for continental sites Folie 14 14

Earth Tides and Reference Frames Characteristics: Shifts up to ±20 centimeters ITRF TSX-1 / TDX-1 orbit in ITRF-2005/08 coordinates e.g. ETRF Honolulu, July 31th, 2010 0.2 0.15 0.1 Deformation [m] 0.05 0 12:00-0.05 AM 2:24 AM 4:48 AM 7:12 AM 9:36 AM 12:00 PM 2:24 PM 4:48 PM 7:12 PM 9:36 PM 12:00 AM Up North East -0.1-0.15 Daytime [UTC] Folie 15 15

Further Follow-On Systematic Assessment of Submeter Influences Unprecedented high pixel localization accuracy of TerraSAR-X and bistatic TanDEM-X configuration allows a further systematic assessment of submeter accuracy influences Techniques for High Accuracy Relative and Absolute Localization of TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X Data, Balss et al (DLR), IGARSS 2011 (July), Vancouver Discussed Influence Factors reference frames and continental drift bistatic acquisition geometry and stop/go approximations in SAR processor Further improvements on both absolute and relative localization accuracy Folie 16 16

Continental Drift and Geodetic Coordinate Systems ITRF TSX-1 / TDX-1 orbit in ITRF-2005/08 coordinates GPS usually reported in a tectonic plate fixed system, e.g. ETRF89 for Europe risk: misinterpretation of GPS coordinates e.g. ETRF offset between expected and true CR position (e.g. approx. 60 cm if ETRS89 is taken for ITRF-2005) Folie 17 17

Effect of Continental Drift on Radar Coordinates (e.g. corner reflector CR moved to northeast) ascending orbit (right looking): t 1 t 2 >t 1 flight path CR occurs more in late azimuth and far range than expected W S height N E expected position of CR continental drift true position of CR azimuth range Folie 18 18

Effect of Continental Drift on Radar Coordinates (e.g. corner reflector CR moved to northeast) descending orbit (right looking): t 1 t 2 <t 1 CR occurs more in early azimuth and near range than expected W S height N E flight path expected position of CR continental drift true position of CR range azimuth Folie 19 19

Effect of a Coordinate System Mismatch Wrong: ETRS89 coordinates are misinterpreted as ITRS-2005 Correct: ETRS89 coordinates are transformed to ITRS-2005 system Folie 20 20

Further TerraSAR-X SAR System Update July 18, 2011 SAR processor TMSP update: new version 4.6 range focusing module update (change of focusing reference) removal of range bandwidth dependant systematic TMSP internal offsets (order ± 23 cm) thus: further pixel localization accuracy improvement IOCS Auxiliary Product Updates TSX IOCS Aux 004.009 TDX IOCS Aux 001.011 calibrated instrument delays: no consideration of Earth tides (only continental drift considered) Folie 21 21

Consideration of Earth Tides and Atmospheric Path Delay azimuth offset [m] 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1.0 range offset [m] ascending descending Residual offsets as obtained with improved atmospheric path delay and operational instrument delay values DLR discussions and measurements are confirmed by an independant very nice study from RSL, Univ. of Zurich: Mitigation of Atmospheric Perturbations and Solid Earth Movements in TerraSAR-X Time Series, Schubert et al, Journal of Geodesy (online), DOI 10.1007/s00190-011-0515-6, Oct. 2011, Springer Folie 22 22

Consideration of Earth Tides and Atmospheric Path Delay 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 ascending descending 0.8 0.6 ascending descending azimuth offset [m] 0.4 0.2 0.0-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1.0 range offset [m] Residual offsets as obtained with improved atmospheric path delay and operational instrument delay values azimuth offset [m] 0.4 0.2 0.0-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1.0 range offset [m] Improved residual offsets as obtained with improved atmospheric path delay and accordingly adopted instrument delay values Folie 23 23

Absolute Localization Accuracy of TSX-1 azimuth offset [m] 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.8-1.0 range offset [m] 100 MHz 150 MHz 300 MHz σ azimuth = 6.3 cm σ range = 3.8 cm The following offsets are subtracted: azimuth offset: +8 cm range offset : -29 cm Reprocessing done with - actual TMSP version - improved atmospheric delay - improved instrument delay values Folie 24 24

Relative Localization Accuracy of Bistatic TanDEM-X Acquisitions azimuth offset [m] 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00-0.02-0.04-0.06 TSX-1 active TDX-1 active -0.010-0.008-0.006-0.004-0.002 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 mean value: m azimuth = -18 mm m range = -2.1 mm standard deviation: over all acquisitions: σ azimuth = 40 mm σ range = 4.4 mm within an acquisition: σ azimuth = 16 mm σ range = 1.0 mm -0.08-0.10 range offset [m]! different scaling of axes azimuth: -100 +60 mm range : -10 +6 mm Folie 25 25

Glacier Velocity Measurements Average Three-Year Velocity Map Drygalski Glacier, Antarctica 6.0 [m/d] 0.0 5 km C A W. Abdel Jaber, D. Floricioiu, M. Eineder Folie 26 26

Co-Seismic Displacement Map at Sendai az N. Yague-Martinez, C. Minet Folie 27 27

Conclusions and Outlook operational TerraSAR-X pixel location accuracy well within in sub-meter range if atmospheric propagation effects (either from measurements or models) and Earth tides effects considered appropriately: pixel localization accuracy even in centimeter range TanDEM-X: relative pixel localization accuracy in range in sub-centimeter range TerraSAR-X may be used as geometric reference for other sensors (e.g. optical) high-resolution image correlation techniques open new areas of applications from single scene acquisitions, e.g. displacement measurements TerraSAR-X bears potential to be a precise geodetic measurement device future work: refine methods for TerraSAR-X (towards a value-added product) adopt methods and findings for other SAR missions, specifically Sentinel-1 Folie 28 28