Bowmanville Marsh Habitat Restoration and Public Access Project



Similar documents
Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Request for Proposal

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE

Pioneer Park Stormwater Management Rehabilitation Project Town of Richmond Hill Engineering and Public Works Department Design, Construction and

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

West London Dyke Flood Control Structure Master Plan Appendix A

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Restoration Program Design Review Group. Project Summary Outline

Halton Region Planning & Public Works Committee Meeting July 8, 2015

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Attachment 1 CARRUTHERS CREEK FLOOD MANAGEMENT and ANALYSIS DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE

How To Protect A Floodplain From Flooding

Penticton Creek May 4, 2015 Council Meeting

TITLE: [Name of municipality] Storm Water Abatement Feasibility Study

FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CENTRAL NEW YORK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REAL ESTATE SITE PROFILE DATA BASE SYRACUSE, NEW YORK MARCH 25, 2013

Nipigon Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

The purpose of this meeting is to inform the public of the updates to the project, and to get input before the finalization of the project.

Position Statement regarding Offshore Wind Proposals on Lake Huron. Lake Huron Centre for Coastal Conservation

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

NEW BRUNSWICK DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY AND SERVICES EEL RIVER DAM REMOVAL/ DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Thunder Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Rediscovery of Two Federally Listed Rare Plant Species in New York

HERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate at the City of Toronto

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

City of Red Wing REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. Levee Park - Riverboat & Transient Boat Dockage, Park and Promenade Improvements Professional Services

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.

What Is Rehabilitation?

Technical Memorandum No. 1: Environmental Approach and Decision Making Criteria

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

St. Clair College Planning Area Introduction

LYNDE CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Acton Quarry Extension. Halton Region June 11, 2014

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

Newsletter Jumbo Glacier Alpine Resort Proposal

Provincial Policy Statement

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

FLOOD PLAIN DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Burnt River Black River and Gull River Flood Contingency Plan

Coastal Engineering Indices to Inform Regional Management

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Photo by Jeff Thibodeau, Helios Land Design

Post-Flood Assessment

Phases 2 & 3, & Addendum Urban Structure Plan Options for West Whitby

St. Vrain Watershed Master Plan Thursday, January 23 10:00 a.m. 12:15 p.m.

THE 4 MAJOR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

One Major Six Concentrations. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst

How To Rehabilitate A Dam In A Lake Dike

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

I.I Action Plan. Canada-US Cooperation in the Salish Sea: Environment Environnement ft EA~ United s tates. Canada Canada,,.

Mer Bleue Wetland Management Plan: Executive Summary National Capital Commission National Capital Greenbelt Elgin Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P

Appendix B: Cost Estimates

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Port Austin Harbor, Michigan

Recognizing Wetlands. For additional information contact your local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers office. Pitcher plant.

COASTAL APPLICATION FOR A MAJOR SITING PERMIT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Executive Summary

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

5 ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND EVALUATION

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

Navigating the Credit River by Canoe, Kayak, Raft and Tubes

Haynes Recreation Center, Laredo, TX. Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks

The 25 Year Saskatchewan Water Security Plan. February 2013

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Transcription:

Bowmanville Marsh Habitat Restoration and Public Access Project Terms of Reference for Detailed and Conceptual Design Works December 2015

1.0 Background and Purpose The Bowmanville Marsh Habitat Restoration Project focuses on improving the wetland conditions and habitat opportunities within the Bowmanville Marsh, a 33-hectare Provincially Significant Lake Ontario coastal wetland located in the Municipality of Clarington, and within the 66 ha Bowmanville/Westside Conservation Area that is owned and managed by CLOCA. 12 years of monitoring data collected through the Durham Region Coastal Wetland Monitoring Project (DRCWMP) has shown that Bowmanville Marsh is in a generally poor, declining condition. The ultimate goal of the Bowmanville Marsh Habitat Restoration Project is to significantly improve the wetland conditions in the marsh by isolating the marsh from the Bowmanville Creek and controlling water levels in the marsh in a way that better mimics natural pre-regulation Lake Ontario water level fluctuation. The installation of a berm and control structure along the mouth of the wetland will be required to achieve this goal. Water level control within the Marsh will allow for both periods of low water levels to stimulate wetland plant growth (for up to 1 year in length), and periods of high water level to limit plant growth (for up to 1 year in length). Bowmanville Marsh is partially separated from Bowmanville/Soper Creek along its eastern boundary by an earthen levee. Some of this levee has been naturally created by deposition from the adjacent creek over the last century, over the same period of time, dredged material from surrounding harbor activities has also been placed on the berm. At the north limit of the Marsh, flood water from the Bowmanville/Soper Creek periodically enters the Marsh during spring freshet or significant rain event floods. Beyond the occasional flow event into the north end of the Marsh, the wetland water level is controlled by the water level of the Bowmanville/Soper Creek at the Marsh outlet (southeast limit). The creek water level is directly linked to the water level of Lake Ontario. The goal of the public access component of this project is to incorporate low impact recreation features taking into consideration the Bowmanville Marsh Habitat Restoration Project staging and access requirements for construction equipment. 1

Several technical studies have been completed in support of this project and are listed below: Durham Region Coastal Wetland Monitoring Project: Wetland Conditions and Management Report (Module 16 is Bowmanville Marsh) prepared by CLOCA and Environment Canada dated December 18 2014. Bathymetry survey completed by Canadian Wildlife Services dated April 22 2015. Topographic Survey completed by CLOCA dated March 10 2015. Digital elevation model of topographic and bathymetry surveys prepared by CLOCA dated December 16 2015. Bowmanville Marsh Restoration Hydrological Study prepared by CLOCA dated March 2015. Bowmanville Marsh Restoration Water Level Monitoring Study prepared by CLOCA dated 2015. A Soil Investigation for Proposed Bowmanville Marsh Investigation prepared by Soil Engineers Ltd., Dated April 2015. The investigational geotechnical study outlines the borehole and soil sampling data collected along the existing levee and within proposed berm/control structure location. The purpose of this study is to generate a detailed design for the Bowmanville Marsh Restoration Project and a concept plan for the public access component. The detailed design will include a berm and water level control structure at the mouth of Bowmanville Marsh. The proposed berm and control structure should be designed to provide a range in marsh water levels. Another previous study investigated the potential range in water levels. The maximum proposed water level will be assumed to be no greater than 75.76, which is the maximum historical high water elevation of Lake Ontario (1952) and the minimum proposed water level will be below the normal creek water levels. Lowest possible water levels within the marsh are proposed approximately once every 10 years, for the equivalent of one full growing season. A secondary berm and control structure will be required at the north limit of the Marsh to control high flow inputs to the Marsh from the Bowmanville/Soper Creek. The proposed inlet structure at the north end of the Bowmanville Marsh should also be incorporated into the detailed design. The purpose of the public access conceptual plan is to connect the existing parking lot to the berm and control structure project with an accessible trail, naturalized planting, interpretive signage, fishing nodes, kayak and canoe access and an accessible portage feature. Figure 1 presents an aerial photo of the marsh and identifies key locations. 2

PUBLIC ACCESS

2.0 Study Approach The following outlines the two stage approach for the proposed restoration project: Stage 1: Detailed Design of Berm, Control Structure and Inlet Control Structure Detailed review of project background material. Site visit and project start-up meeting. Develop and present feasible design options to CLOCA and Municipality of Clarington Present design alternatives Complete detailed design of preferred design option. Finalize engineering drawings and report. Prepare construction cost estimate. Obtain approvals from applicable Municipal/Provincial/Federal Agencies. Stage 2: Conceptual Landscape Design Detailed review of project background material. Site visit and project start-up meeting. In consultation with CLOCA staff, prepare an analysis of the study area in its proposed form featuring existing infrastructure to guide the landscape design process. Develop the best options for public access based on hydrologic and hydraulic constraints; proposed berm location, bathymetry, terrestrial natural heritage data; fish data; and existing surrounding land use. Provide conceptual designs and mapping identifying public access opportunities for pedestrians, anglers, non-motorized recreational boating activities including launching and portaging, wildlife viewing and interpretation activities. Public safety design considerations. Signage and/or commemorative features to acknowledge project partners. Public Process CLOCA has included public consultation throughout the Management planning for the Bowmanville/Westside Marshes Conservation Area Master Plan, and Bowmanville Marsh Restoration Project. CLOCA will continue the commitment to public consultation through the design and development of this project. Public information sessions to showcase the design of restoration features will be arranged, financed, and managed by CLOCA. CLOCA will also work closely with staff from the Municipality of Clarington, to ensure the Restoration works compliment the municipal development of the Port Darlington waterfront parkland development. CLOCA reserves the right to administer this project in two (2) parts should they choose to do so. Please prepare the bid in two (2) parts to correspond to the above sections. 4

3.0 Deliverables Report submissions will be required through the study process as follows: Final Study Report with design drawings - 6 copies. The final report/drawings will also be made available to CLOCA in digital form (PDF). The consultant should also budget for a minimum of three (3) meetings with CLOCA to be held at project start-up, presentation of design alternatives, and completion of design. 4.0 Proposal Contents and Submission All proposals shall be evaluated based on the suggested methodology and work program, company experience, staffing experience, knowledge of the watershed, and cost. CLOCA reserves the right to reject any or all proposals should it be deemed in their best interest to do so. A complete proposal shall include the following information: I. A Work Plan including a brief description of the methodology should be provided. Any optional/additional work suggested in the interest of creating a better product should be identified and priced as a separate item. II. III. IV. Per Diem and Project Component Costs shall be provided as well as total costs (including GST) for all work required to complete the project Company Experience with soils analysis and borehole projects shall be identified. Please list recent similar projects and provide references. Similar information should be provided for any sub-consultants that are part of the study team. Key Staff Members that will lead the various components of the study shall be identified, and a summary of recent experience for each individual provided. Where subconsultants are proposed, list projects where the various study members worked together. The structure of the study team is to be clearly identified with one individual ultimately responsible for reporting to CLOCA. V. Any Potential Conflicts shall be listed including on-going work for development or personal interests within the area. Two copies of proposals are to be received by the Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority by 2:00pm, January 18, 2016. Late submissions will not be accepted. 5