Haynes Recreation Center, Laredo, TX. Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks

Transcription

1 Haynes Recreation Center, Laredo, TX Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks (Updated Spring 2010) 1 Standard Benchmarks BENCHMARKS UNITS PRE PROJECT GOAL Property value (pre/post) Assessed or redevelopment value $36 million Annual tax revenue Tax Increment Public sector incentives Brownfields, infrastructure, other Ratio public cost to total redevelopment value Land remediated and redeveloped Rangeland 18 acres Building area developed/restored (post) Square feet 50,000-square-foot recreation center Number of jobs created/retained Created/retained, full/part-time; if available, construction/regular 1 The data matrices are intended to present an informal pre-development snapshot of conventional and sustainability-oriented information for each of the U.S. EPA s Brownfields Sustainability Pilots and their surrounding neighborhoods. Information was gathered from the U.S. Census and a variety of preliminary planning documents from 2008 to Given that most of these projects are at the early stages of planning and development, the information below is subject to change. For questions, please contact Christopher De Sousa, [email protected]. Research support provided by Jason Tilidetzke and Kevin Duffy. This work was performed under a subcontract with the University of Illinois at Chicago and made possible by grant number TR from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1

2 CENSUS BENCHMARKS 2

3 Pop Change (per cent).25 Mile Buffer Mean Max Min St. Deviation 5,914 7,139 4,970 1,050 4,151 5,669 2,934 1,136 50% 72% -10% 40% Density 9,453 13, ,335 Total White Alone 5,813 7,024 4,884 1,037 Total Black Alone Total Hispanic 5,768 6,932 4,767 1,045 1,576 2,008 1, ,079 1, Household Change Average HH Size Total Families 1,376 1,732 1, Total Housing Units 1,678 2,080 1, Owner 1,073 1, Renter Vacant Housing Units Median HH income $26,938 $33,272 $21,169 $5,323 Aggregate HH Income $60,263,884 $85,998,400 $41,651,259 $18,663,479 Average HH Income $38,190 $42,844 $26,212 $8,039 Per Capita Income $10,258 $12,046 $6,473 $2,601 3

4 Proportion of long time residents Proportion of recent movers Median Home Value* Number Under Poverty Level* $63,950 $81,400 $46,200 $15,686 4,142 5,650 2,934 1,127 *Used 2000 Census Data.50 Mile Buffer Mean Max Min St. Deviation 4,432 7, ,477 3,305 5, ,666 Pop Change (per cent) 31% 72% -11% 42% Density 8,261 13, ,292 Total White Alone 4,356 7, ,435 Total Black Alone Total Hispanic 4,310 6, ,438 1,195 2, , Household Change Average HH Size Total Families 1,040 1, Total Housing Units 1,274 2, Owner 796 1,

5 Renter Vacant Housing Units Median HH income $28,543 $33,272 $21,169 $4,866 Aggregate HH Income $47,464,592 $85,998,400 $7,992,725 $26,060,602 Average HH Income $40,777 $55,238 $26,212 $9,452 Per Capita Income $11,335 $16,447 $6,473 $3,216 Proportion of long time residents Proportion of recent movers Median Home Value* $64,867 $81,400 $46,200 $13,214 Number Under Poverty Level* 3,297 5, ,662 Pop Change (per cent) *Used 2000 Census Data 1 Mile Buffer Mean Max Min St. Deviation 3,481 11, ,975 2,629 6, ,679 20% 78% -21% 38% Density 6,487 13, ,373 Total White Alone Total Black Alone Total Hispanic 3,385 10, , ,294 9, ,755 5

6 959 3, , Household Change Average HH Size Total Families 827 2, Total Housing Units 1,038 3, Owner 646 2, Renter Vacant Housing Units Median HH income $31,838 $57,752 $20,612 $10,873 Aggregate HH Income $43,910,657 $210,893,493 $7,992,725 $50,865,064 Average HH Income $42,906 $69,694 $26,212 $14,206 Per Capita Income $12,789 $26,130 $6,473 $5,251 Proportion of long time residents Proportion of recent movers Median Home Value* $74,480 $112,000 $46,200 $20,698 Number Under Poverty Level* 2,719 5, ,561 *Used 2000 Census Data Webb County Mean Max Min St. Deviation 2,688 26, ,510 2,146 15, ,101 6

7 Pop Change (per cent) 11% 89% -43% 34% Density 7,132 24, ,562 Total White Alone 2,638 26, ,457 Total Black Alone Total Hispanic 2,559 26, , , , Household Change Average HH Size Total Families 613 5, Total Housing Units 774 5, Owner 484 5, Renter Vacant Housing Units Median HH income $27,820 $86,642 $7,240 $14,309 Aggregate HH Income $29,427,652 $210,893,493 $1,488,291 $37,031,114 Average HH Income $37,707 $117,113 $14,142 $18,165 Per Capita Income $10,997 $32,348 $4,264 $5,455 Proportion of long time residents Proportion of recent movers Median Home Value* $66,776 $194,600 $26,900 $30,028 Number Under Poverty Level* 2,115 15, ,094 *Used 2000 Census Data 7

8 Sustainability Benchmarks Economic UNITS PRE PROJECT GOAL Value of surrounding property (pre/post) Assessed value N/A Public costs per job created (permanent) Use above values N/A Number of new businesses on the site (post) Development proposal 11- development of eco-tourism (bird and nature watching activities) Influences local household income Census (pre/post) Environment LEED Building Rating Proportion of contaminated soil managed on site vs. diverted off Total soil estimated/soil removed from site Density (post) Floor area ratio, net density Pedestrian infrastructure (pre/post); length (meters, remote sensing, maps) Linear Park of sidewalks Bike infrastructure (pre/post) (bike racks) Linear Park Bike Trails (meters) Transit access (pre/post) (transit stops) Other transport Zipcars, etc Public parks and open space (post) (acres) Linear Park Canopy cover (pre/post, longer increments) - aerial photo comparison (% of total area) Natural habitat created and restored (post); connectivity (acres, % of site area) Access to waterfront (pre/post) (meters or linear feet) One-third of the Chacon Creek hike and bike trail system is completed Pervious vs. impervious (% total area, remote sensing image) Stormwater management (post) Cubic meters, green roof, rain garden, cistern (Center for Neigh 8 Natural habitat conservation (babbling brooks and native vegetation) Wetland and ecosystem restoration $2.6 million sought to study the restoration of the ecosystem Porous pavers and pervious concrete to allow for stormwater absorption below parking and walking areas -Flood and erosion control -Creating buffer zones along creeks and streams

9 Local food production? (farmer s market formation) Water efficiency - building and land Energy efficiency Energy generation (renewable energy production) Building restoration/reuse Tech tool) (Pounds?) -Improvement of water quality: Upon completion of the proposed improvements, the reduction in 100-year floodplain elevation will remove approximately 250 homes from the floodplain. -Bioswales and bioretention swales featuring native plants to absorb stormwater runoff -Tree locations for additional bioabsorption of stormwater runoff No (% reduction, refer to reports) (kwh saved, refer to reports) (kwh/year, refer to development proposal) (sq. ft., % total, energy of materials estimate?) Materials reuse (weight?) Waste management (diversion rate) Assessment of options for removing hundreds of tires dumped into Chacon Creek Social and Community Involves coordination among multiple (yes/no, interviews) stakeholders Involves an open public participation process (some measure of scale; arnstein, interviews) Community amenity (# of community venues) Yes, environmental justice goal Affordable housing (# of units, % of total units, development proposal) Allows for some level of local control over Interviews the project Fosters community cohesion? # of visitors Reduces local crime rate Crime prevention initiative Provides an opportunity for training (# of individuals trained or hours of training, Refer to proposal or interviews) Involves a mixture of land uses Two or more different uses 9