ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Transcription

1 PRAIRIE DU ROCHER CCSD 3 PRAIRIE DU ROCHER, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND OTHER INFORMATION Asian/ Pacific Islander 3.8 Native American.2 Multi racial /Ethnic 2.2 Low- Income Rate Limited- English- Proficient Rate 7.2 High Sch. Dropout Rate Chronic Truancy Rate Mobility Rate Attendance Rate Total Enrollment 73 2,77,856 Low-income students come from families receiving public aid; live in institutions for neglected or delinquent children; are supported in foster homes with public funds; or are eligible to receive free or reduced-price lunches. Limited-English-proficient students are those students eligible for transitional bilingual programs. Mobility rate is based on the number of times students enroll in or leave a school during the school year. Chronic truants are students who are absent from school without valid cause for 8 or more of the last 8 school days. INSTRUCTIONAL SETTING PARENTAL CONTACT* Percent STUDENT-TO-STAFF RATIOS Pupil- Teacher Elementary Pupil- Teacher Secondary Pupil- Certified Staff Pupil- Administrator * Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence. AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (as of the first school day in May) Grades K TIME DEVOTED TO TEACHING CORE SUBJECTS (Minutes Per Day) English/Language Arts Grades Social TEACHER INFORMATION (Full-Time Equivalents) Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Total Number ,

2 2 TEACHER INFORMATION ( Continued ) : All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools : All Schools High Poverty Schools Average Teaching Experience (Years) % of Teachers with Bachelor's Degrees % of Teachers with Master's & Above % of Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials % of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers The No Child Left Behind Act requires that information for certain data elements be disaggregated by high- and low-poverty schools. Poverty (low-income) is defined on page of all report cards. High- and low-poverty schools include those in the top and bottom quarters of the poverty distribution of schools in the state. Disaggregated data are reported only if at least one school in your district falls within the high-poverty quarter and at least one school within the low-poverty quarter. Low Poverty Schools SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCES TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES (Full-Time Equivalents) $2, $6, Salaries and counts of staff are summed across a district based on the percentage of time that each individual is employed as a teacher or an administrator and may or may not reflect the actual paid salaries for the district. $2, $2,3 $8, $, $5,29 $58,275 $75,9 $ Average Teacher Salary Average Administrator Salary EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION 25-6 (Percentages) Instruction General Administration Supporting Services Other Expenditures

3 3 REVENUE BY SOURCE 25-6 % % EXPENDITURE BY FUND 25-6 % % Local Property Taxes Other Local Funding General Aid Other Funding Federal Funding TOTAL $286,65 $75,366 $69,2 $88,2 $3,663 $,353, Education Operations & Maintenance Transportation Bond and Interest Rent Municipal Retirement/ Social Security Fire Prevention & Safety Site & Construction/ Capital Improvement TOTAL $98,79 $25,8 $7,75 $ $ $37,68 $ $ $,252, OTHER FINANCIAL INDICATORS 2 Equalized Assessed Valuation per Pupil 2 Total School Tax Rate per $ $2, ** ** 25-6 Instructional Expenditure per Pupil $,35 $5, Operating Expenditure per Pupil $6,736 $9,88 ** Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per $ are not provided. Equalized assessed valuation includes all computed property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated. Total school tax rate is a district's total tax rate as it appears on local property tax bills. Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils. Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal retired, and capital expenditures. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE These charts present the overall percentages of state test scores categorized as meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards for your district and the state. They represent your district's performance in reading, mathematics and science. OVERALL PERFORMANCE - ALL STATE TESTS

4 OVERALL ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) PERFORMANCE

5 5 ISAT PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards for the grades and subjects tested on ISAT. ISAT Grade ISAT Grade ISAT Grade

6 6 ISAT Grade ISAT Grade ISAT Grade

7 7 PERFORMANCE ON STATE ASSESSMENTS Federal law requires that student achievement results for reading, mathematics and science for schools providing Title I services be reported to the general public. The Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) is administered to students in grades 3 through 8. The Prairie Achievement Examination (PSAE) is administered to students in grade. The Illinois Measure of Annual Growth in English (IMAGE) is administered to limited-english-proficient students. The Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) is administered to students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) indicate that participation in the ISAT or PSAE would not be appropriate. Students with disabilities have an IEP (No Child Left Behind Act). An IEP is a written plan for a child with a disability who is eligible to receive special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS All Gender Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Multi racial /Ethnic LEP Migrant Economically Students with Disadvantaged Disabilities *Enrollment *Enrollment,8, , , ,977 2, 26,359, ,757 23,96 8, , ,9.. * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows. ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level 2 -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results. Grade 3 Grade 3 - All

8 8 Grade 3 - Gender Grade 3 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic Grade Grade - All Grade - Gender

9 9 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic Grade 5 Grade 5 - All Grade 5 - Gender Grade 5 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic

10 Grade 6 Grade 6 - All Grade 6 - Gender Grade 6 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic Grade 7 Grade 7 - All Grade 7 - Gender

11 Grade 7 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic Grade Grade 8 - All Grade 8 - Gender Grade 8 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic

12 2 27 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) INFORMATION Is this district making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Yes Has this district been identified for Improvement according to the AYP specifications of the federal No Child Left Behind Act? No Is this district making AYP in? Yes 27-8 Federal Improvement Status Is this district making AYP in? Yes 27-8 Improvement Status Percent Tested on Tests Percent Meeting/Exceeding Standards * Other Indicators Attendance Rate Graduation Rate % Met AYP % Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Met AYP % Met AYP AYP Minimum Target All Yes Yes 83.5 Yes 93. Yes 95. Yes Yes Yes 83.5 Yes 93. Yes Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial /Ethnic LEP Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Four Conditions Are Required For Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP):. At least 95% tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95%, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95%, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95%. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95% and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95% condition was met by averaging. 2. At least 55.% meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 55.% meeting/exceeding standards, a 95% confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions.*** 3. For schools not making AYP solely because the IEP group fails to have 55.% meeting/exceeding standards, % may be added to this variable in accordance with the federal 2% flexibility provision.. At least 9% attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 72% graduation rate for high schools. * Includes only students enrolled as of 5//26. ** Safe Harbor Targets of 55.% or above are not printed. ***Subgroups with fewer than 5 students are not reported. Safe Harbor only applies to subgroups of 5 or more. In order for Safe Harbor to apply, a subgroup must decrease by % the percentage of scores that did not meet standards from the previous year plus meet the other indicators (attendance rate for non-high schools and graduation rate for high schools) for the subgroup. For subgroups that do not meet their Safe Harbor Targets, a 75% confidence interval is applied. Safe Harbor allows schools an alternate method to meet subgroup minimum targets on achievement.

13 3 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS Below is a list of the Title I funded schools in the district that are in School Improvement Status as defined by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2. Number of schools in this district: Number of Title I schools: Number of Title I schools in School Improvement Status: Percent of schools in School Improvement Status: % School ID School Name Years in School Improvement