Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Michigan s State Performance Plan Annual Public Reporting

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Michigan s State Performance Plan Annual Public Reporting"

Transcription

1 Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Michigan s State Performance Plan Annual Public Reporting All data reported are from Michigan s Annual Performance Report, submitted 2/1/2012. These data typically reflect the school year (July 1, 2010-June 30, 2011) except where noted. Indicator 1: Graduation (Results Indicator) The Indicator 1 data are from because the US Department of Education prescribed a one-year data lag for this indicator. All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of youth with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) graduating from high school with a regular diploma. The state target: 80.0% The state performance on the target: 57.4%. The state target was. Source: Michigan Student Data System, Graduation/Dropout Review and Comment Application, and Student Record Maintenance The state and district performance are calculated to align with the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) using the number of youth with IEPs who entered ninth grade in one school year and received a regular diploma within four years (a cohort) divided by the total number of youth with IEPs in the cohort times 100. Additional district graduation data for the ESEA are available at the Center for Education Performance and Information website at See Cohort Graduation and Dropout Reports. More information about this indicator is found in the Special Education Facts from the Indicator 2: Dropout (Results Indicator) The Indicator 2 data are from because the US Department of Education prescribed a one-year data lag for this indicator. All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of youth with an Individualized Education Program dropping out of high school. The state target: less than or equal to 9.0% The state performance on the target: 6.1%. The state target was met. Source: Michigan Student Data System, Graduation and Dropout Review and Comment Application, and Student Record Maintenance The state and district performance are calculated using an event snapshot rate of students with an IEP ages The dropout event snapshot rate calculates the number of students with an IEP who dropped out in one school year divided by the number of students with an IEP ages who were enrolled in school that year.

2 Additional district dropout data for the Elementary and Secondary Education Act are available at the Center for Education Performance and Information (CEPI) website at See Cohort Graduation and Dropout Report. More information about this indicator is found in the one page Special Education Facts from the Office of Special Education at Indicator 3: Statewide Assessment (Results Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: Participation and performance of children with individualized education programs (IEPs) on statewide assessments: A. Percent of the districts with a sufficient disability subgroup that meets the state s minimum n size that meet the state s AYP targets for the disability subgroup. The state target: 98.0% The state performance on the target: 96.6%. The state target was. B. Participation rate for children with IEPs.. The state target: 95.0% The State Performance on the Reading : Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 Actual 98.6% 98.9% 98.9% 98.9% 98.7% 98.5% 92.6% Status met met met met met met The State Performance on the Mathematics : Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 Actual 98.2% 98.8% 98.9% 98.8% 98.4% 98.1% 91.9% Status met met met met met met C. Proficiency rate for children with IEPs against grade level, modified and alternate academic achievement standards. (20 U.S.C (a)(3)(a)) The State Performance on the Reading : Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade % 77.0% 76.0% 75.0% 74.0% 73.0% 79.0% Actual 64.5% 58.0% 57.2% 54.8% 45.7% 51.2% 36.4% Status The State Performance on the Mathematics : Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade % 74.0% 71.0% 70.0% 67.0% 66.0% 67.0% Actual 86.4% 78.0% 53.9% 58.6% 55.1% 49.9% 23.7% Status met met Source: Bureau of Assessment and Accountability (same source for A, B & C parts of the indicator) The state and district performance are calculated for participation and performance of children with individualized education programs (IEPs) on statewide assessments.

3 Assessment results are available to the public at: _ ,00.html. More information about this indicator is found in the one page Special Education Facts from the Office of Special Education at: Indicator 4A: Suspension/Expulsion (Results Indicator) The Indicator 4A data are from because the US Department of Education prescribed a one-year data lag for this indicator. All states are required to collect and report data on: suspensions/expulsions greater than 10 Days, for student with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) whether in one incident, or an accumulation throughout the school year. Michigan counts out-of-school suspensions/expulsions for this indicator. The state target: 5.0% or less of all districts will have a significant discrepancy in their suspensions/expulsions rates of among students with an IEP. The state performance on the target: 2.8%. The state target was met. Source: Michigan Student Data System District performance is calculated by identifying a significant discrepancy if more than 5% of its students with an IEP received out-of-school suspensions/expulsions for greater than ten cumulative days. Districts with fewer than five students with an IEP suspended/ expelled for more than ten days were exempt from significant discrepancy calculations. Indicator 4B: Suspension/Expulsion by Race/Ethnicity (Compliance Indicator) The Indicator 4B data are from because the US Department of Education prescribed a one-year data lag for this indicator. All states are required to collect and report data on: suspensions/expulsions greater than 10 days by race/ethnicity, for students with an Individualized Education Program (IEP). The suspensions/expulsions may be from one incident, or an accumulation throughout the school year. In Michigan these are out-of-school suspensions/expulsions. The state target : 0% The state performance on the target: 5.9%. The state target was. Source: Michigan Student Data System (MSDS),

4 District performance is calculated by: identifying both 1) a significant discrepancy by race/ethnicity in rates of suspensions and expulsions greater than ten days, and 2) policies, procedures, or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy. Michigan defines significant discrepancy as 3.6% or more of a district s students with an IEP within a racial/ethnic group are suspended/expelled greater than 10 days. Indicator 5: Educational Environments (Results Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) aged 6-21 that receive their education A. Inside the regular class 80% or more of the day; B. Inside the regular class less than 40% of the day; C. In public or private separate schools, residential placements, or homebound or hospital placements. The state targets: A. Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day to 63.0%. B. Decrease the percentage of students served inside the regular class less than 40% of the day to 11.9%. C. Maintain the percentage of students served in separate facilities at less than or equal to 4.8%. The state performance on the targets: A. 62.8%. The state target was. B. 12.7%. The state target was. C. 5.3%. The state target was. Source: Michigan Student Data System

5 Indicator 7: Preschool Outcomes (Results Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of children who a) did not improve, b) improved functioning but not sufficient comparable to same-aged peers, c) improved to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it, d) improved to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers, or e) maintained at a level comparable to same-aged peers on the following 3 outcomes: A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships); B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy); and C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs. The state performance is calculated using Summary Statements for each of the 3 outcomes. Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program. Measurement for Summary Statement 1: Percent = number of preschool children reported in progress categories: c + d divided by a + b + c + d times 100. Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program. Measurement for Summary Statement 2: Percent = number of preschool children reported in progress categories: d + e divided by a + b + c + d + e times 100. Data reflect all children with an IEP enrolled in this district, both resident and nonresident. Outcome Areas State Actual Performance Status Outcome A: Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships) Summary Statement % 81.1% Not Met Summary Statement % 56.5% Not Met Outcome B: Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy) Summary Statement % 82.2% Not Met Summary Statement % 56.6% Not Met Outcome C: Use of appropriate behaviors to meet this needs Summary Statement % 80.6% Not Met Summary Statement % 62.5% Not Met Source: Michigan Student Data System, HighScope

6 Indicator 8: Facilitated Parent Involvement (Results Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of parents with a child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with an IEP. The state targets: Children ages 3-5: 35.5% of families will rate their school at or above the 600 standard score. Students ages 6-21: 22.0% of families will rate their school at or above the 600 standard score. The state performance on the targets: Children ages 3-5: 58.7%. The state target was met. Students ages 6-21: 25.9%. The state target was met. Source: National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring (NCSEAM) Survey State and district performance are calculated using a survey of all parents of children receiving special education services ages three through five years and one-third of all parents of school age children receiving special education services ages six through twenty-one. The NCSEAM set a national standard score of 600. More information about this indicator is found in the one page Special Education Facts from the Office of Special Education at Materials are also available at the Wayne State University website: Indicator 9: Disproportionate Representation - Child with a Disability (Compliance Indicator) The Indicator 9 data are from and because a two-year pattern is required in Michigan. All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of districts with a higher or lower than expected number of students with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) of any racial and ethnic groups that is the result of inappropriate identification policies, procedures or practices. The state and district target: 0% The state performance on the target: 0.2%. The state target was. Source: Michigan Compliance Information System and the Michigan Student Data System The state and district performance are calculated by identifying districts that have a two-year pattern of disproportionate representation by race/ethnicity. Michigan s definition of districts with disproportionate representation includes both: a. A verified risk ratio for over-representation greater than 2.5 or under-representation less than 0.4. b. An analysis of policies, procedures and practices through state monitoring to identify whether the disproportionate representation is the result of inappropriate identification.

7 For details about the calculation and identification process, refer to the APR pp and the APR Appendix B Disproportionate Representation Business Rules pp More information about this indicator is found in the one page Special Education Facts from the Office of Special Education at Indicator 10: Disproportionate Representation Eligibility Categories (Compliance Indicator). The Indicator 10 data are from and because a two-year pattern is required in Michigan. All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of districts with a higher or lower than expected number of students with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) of any racial and ethnic groups in specific eligibility categories that is the result of inappropriate identification policies, procedures or practices. The state and district target: 0% The state performance on the target: 0.9%. The state target was. Source: Michigan Compliance Information System and the Michigan Student Data System The state and district performance are calculated by identifying districts that have a two-year pattern of disproportionate representation by race/ethnicity. Michigan s definition of districts with disproportionate representation includes both: a. A verified risk ratio for over-representation greater than 2.5, or under-representation less than 0.4. b. An analysis of policies, procedures and practices through state monitoring to identify whether the disproportionate representation is the result of inappropriate identification. For details about the calculation and identification process, refer to the APR pp and the APR Appendix B Disproportionate Representation Business Rules pp More information about this indicator is found in the one page Special Education Facts from the Office of Special Education at Indicator 11: Child Find (Compliance Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of initial special education evaluations completed within 60 days or a state established timeframe (for children ages 2 ½ through age 21 with parental consent to evaluate). The Michigan timeframe is 30 school days or an agreed upon written extension for completion of the evaluation and IEP, whether the student is found eligible or ineligible for special education. The state and district target: 100% The state performance on the target: 99.4%. The state target was. Source: Michigan Student Data System The state and district performance are calculated by: [(The number of children whose evaluations and IEPs were completed within the 30 school days or agreed upon extension) (the number of children for whom parental consent to evaluate was received)] times 100.

8 Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition (Compliance Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of children who are referred by Part C (Early On in Michigan) prior to age 3, are found eligible for special education programs and services, and have an Individualized Education Program (IEP) developed and implemented by their third birthday The state and district target: 100% The state performance on the target: 98.6%. The state target was. Source: Michigan Compliance Information Service, data verification survey The state and district performance are calculated by [(The number of children found eligible who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays) (the number of children served birth through age 2 and referred to special education for eligibility determination minus the number of children NOT eligible whose eligibility was determined prior to their third birthdays minus the number for whom parent refusal caused delays in evaluation or initial services minus the number of children who were referred to Part C less than 90 days before their third birthdays)] times 100. See Cohort Graduation and Dropout Report. More information about this indicator is found in the one page Special Education Facts from the Office of Special Education at Indicator 13: Secondary Transition (Compliance Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of youth aged 16 and above whose Individualized Education Program (IEP) includes: goals that are: o appropriate measurable o annually updated and o based upon age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that: o reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, o relate to the student s transition services needs and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority. The state and district target: 100% The state performance on the target: 99.2% The state target was. Source: National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center, Secondary Transition Checklist

9 The state and district performance are calculated by: The percent = [(# of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student s transition service needs. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority) divided by the (# of youth with an IEP age 16 and above)] times 100. Indicator 14: Postsecondary Outcomes (Results Indicator) All states are required to collect and report data on: the percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had an Individualized Education Program (IEP) in effect at the time they left school, and were: A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school. B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school. C. Enrolled in higher education or some other postsecondary education training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school. The state targets: The percent of students with an IEP: A. Enrolled in higher education is at least 34.3% B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed is at least 58.4% C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment is at least 71.4% The state performance on the target: A. 31.7% in higher education B. 53.0% in higher education or competitively employed C. 67.1% in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment Source: National Post-School Outcomes Center Survey The state and district performance are calculated by using: the National Post-School Outcomes Center s Postsecondary Outcomes Survey to collect information from former students who had exited school (graduated, dropped out, or received a certificate of completion) in the previous academic year. Number of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had an IEP in effect at the time they left school and: A. were enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school divided by the # of respondent youth who are no longer in secondary school and had an IEP in effect at the time they left school. B. were enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school divided by the # of respondent youth who are no longer in secondary school and had an IEP in effect at the time they left school.

10 C. were enrolled in higher education, or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school divided by the # of respondent youth who are no longer in secondary school and had IEPs in effect at the time they left school. Intermediate School District (ISD) combined data and additional details are available at:

Special Education School District Data Profile for 2011-12

Special Education School District Data Profile for 2011-12 Geneseo Central School District for The School District Data Profile is prepared in accordance with the requirement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Each State must have a State

More information

2013-2014 Division Performance (based on data from 2012-2013) 2013-2014 Division. Performance

2013-2014 Division Performance (based on data from 2012-2013) 2013-2014 Division. Performance June 1, 2015 Orange County Public Schools 200 Dailey Drive Orange, VA 22960 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires each state to report to the public on state-level data and individual

More information

New Hampshire Special Education District Report

New Hampshire Special Education District Report Report to Public FFY 2013 APR (July 1, 2013 June 30, 2014) Page 1 Children with Disabilities ages 3 to 5: 0 Children and Youth with Disabilities ages 6 to 21: 192 Children and Youth with Disabilities:

More information

Indicator 1: Graduation

Indicator 1: Graduation The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires each state to report to the public on state-level data and individual school division-level data and to report on whether the state and the

More information

Florida Department of Education Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services. 2016 LEA Profile. Introduction

Florida Department of Education Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services. 2016 LEA Profile. Introduction Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Pam Stewart Commissioner 2016 LEA Profile Introduction : Enrollment Group: PK-12 Population: Percent Disabled: Alachua 20,000 to 40,000 29,320 13% The

More information

About the Division for Special Education Services and Supports Annual Reports, Data Sources, Rules, and Definitions:

About the Division for Special Education Services and Supports Annual Reports, Data Sources, Rules, and Definitions: About the Division for Special Education Services and Supports Annual Reports, Data Sources, Rules, and Definitions: Federal Reporting Requirement State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report The Individuals

More information

Annual Performance Report

Annual Performance Report BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Annual Performance Report Part B FFY 2012 2/3/2014 Revised Clarification 4/30/2014 Table of Contents Introductory Statement..... ii Indicator 1.... 1 Indicator 2.... 4 Indicator

More information

District of Columbia IDEA Part B Local Education Agency Report for Federal Fiscal Year 2010 (July 1, 2010 June 30, 2011)

District of Columbia IDEA Part B Local Education Agency Report for Federal Fiscal Year 2010 (July 1, 2010 June 30, 2011) District of Columbia IDEA Part B Local Education Agency Report for Federal Fiscal Year 2010 (July 1, 2010 June 30, 2011) Contents 1.0 Legislative Authority... 1 2.0 Local Education Agency (LEA) Definition...

More information

SPP/APR Indicator Review Summer 2014

SPP/APR Indicator Review Summer 2014 SPP/APR Indicator Review Summer 2014 July 2014 1 What s New MSIS Manual - Child Count Checklist - LRE Checklist - Personnel July 2014 2 Important Dates July July 1 Begins New School Year in MSIS July 30

More information

c. # of children found eligible with lep s developed and implemented by their third birthday 1,468 37 1,277 31 0 C Divided by (a-b- d- e)

c. # of children found eligible with lep s developed and implemented by their third birthday 1,468 37 1,277 31 0 C Divided by (a-b- d- e) Table A - Data a- # of children served in Part C referred to Part B for eligibility determination b. # of those referred determined to be NOT eligible and whose eligibility was determined prior to their

More information

Richard Wright PCS for Journalism and Media Arts

Richard Wright PCS for Journalism and Media Arts 24-5 Equity Report What is an Equity Report? Equity in education refers to all students receiving the same caliber of education regardless of their race, ethnicity, economic status, special education status

More information

Special Education NSSRS Data Element Definitions

Special Education NSSRS Data Element Definitions Special Education NSSRS Data Element Definitions These definitions are compiled to supplement the Special Education Snapshot instructions in the NSSRS Student Template available on the NSSRS Instructions

More information

SD Part B. FFY2014 State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report. FFY 2014 Part B State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual Performance Report (APR)

SD Part B. FFY2014 State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report. FFY 2014 Part B State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual Performance Report (APR) SD Part B FFY2014 State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report 6/13/2016 Page 1 of 72 Introduction to the State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual Performance Report (APR) Attachments No APR attachments

More information

Name of Grant Program: Early Childhood Special Education Allocation Fund Code: 262

Name of Grant Program: Early Childhood Special Education Allocation Fund Code: 262 Name of Grant Program: Early Childhood Special Education Allocation Fund Code: 262 PART IV REQUIRED STATISTICAL INFORMATION please use this template as a working document and submit final numbers through

More information

Methods for Assessing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education A Technical Assistance Guide (Revised)

Methods for Assessing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education A Technical Assistance Guide (Revised) Methods for Assessing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education A Technical Assistance Guide (Revised) Julie M. Bollmer James W. Bethel Tom E. Munk Amy R. Bitterman May 2014 ideadata.org The

More information

2015-2016 SCHOOL YEAR

2015-2016 SCHOOL YEAR 2015-2016 SCHOOL YEAR Virginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards known as the Standards of Learning (SOL) and through annual assessments of student

More information

ALTERNATE ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS WITH THE MOST SIGNIFICANT COGNITIVE DISABILITIES. Non-Regulatory Guidance

ALTERNATE ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS WITH THE MOST SIGNIFICANT COGNITIVE DISABILITIES. Non-Regulatory Guidance ALTERNATE ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS WITH THE MOST SIGNIFICANT COGNITIVE DISABILITIES Non-Regulatory Guidance August 2005 Alternate Achievement Standards for Students with the Most Significant

More information

School Support System Report and Support Plan. Paul Cuffee Charter School December 2012

School Support System Report and Support Plan. Paul Cuffee Charter School December 2012 Rhode Island Department of Education Office of Student, Community and Academic Supports School Support System Report and Support Paul Cuffee Charter School December 2012 1 SCHOOL SUPPORT SYSTEM A Collaborative

More information

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center District-level data Community Index Data, Year 2004 Each file has one record per Local Education Agency with the percent of students (a)

More information

ANNUAL REPORT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

ANNUAL REPORT ON CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT The mission of the Greenbush-Middle River School is to provide a quality education which will prepare all students to meet success by developing self-directed thinkers and communicators who are responsible,

More information

Texas Continuous Improvement Process Public Input and Information Meetings

Texas Continuous Improvement Process Public Input and Information Meetings Texas Continuous Improvement Process Public Input and Information Meetings 2008-09 Statewide Summary of Regional Feedback Texas Continuous Improvement Process Texas Education Agency Division of IDEA Coordination

More information

Governor Snyder s FY2016 Education & School Aid Budget Recommendations

Governor Snyder s FY2016 Education & School Aid Budget Recommendations Governor Snyder s FY2016 Education & School Aid Budget Recommendations February 23, 2015 The annual budget is the single most powerful expression of the state s priorities. It is during the budget process

More information

School Performance Framework: Technical Guide

School Performance Framework: Technical Guide School Performance Framework: Technical Guide Version 1.6 August 2010 This technical guide provides information about the following topics as they related to interpreting the school performance framework

More information

Alignment effort to ensure that what teachers teach is in accord with what the curriculum says will be taught and what is assessed on official tests

Alignment effort to ensure that what teachers teach is in accord with what the curriculum says will be taught and what is assessed on official tests Glossary of Education Terms General Terms Accountability measurable proof, usually in the form of student results on various tests, that teachers, schools, divisions and states are teaching students efficiently

More information

Exceptional Student Education Compliance Manual

Exceptional Student Education Compliance Manual Exceptional Student Education Compliance Manual 2014 15 Florida Department of Education Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services This publication is produced through the Bureau of Exceptional

More information

New Jersey Department of Education Office of Title I. Understanding Your Annual Progress Targets

New Jersey Department of Education Office of Title I. Understanding Your Annual Progress Targets New Jersey Department of Education Office of Title I Understanding Your Annual Progress Targets As approved in New Jersey s Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Waiver Application,

More information

Updated Frequently Asked Questions for Oregon Diploma Options, 2014

Updated Frequently Asked Questions for Oregon Diploma Options, 2014 Updated Frequently Asked Questions for Oregon Diploma Options, 2014 This document is organized into topic areas: General: Definition and general implementation information Eligibility: Eligibility criteria

More information

District of Columbia Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for FFY 2008 (SY 2008-2009) Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development:

District of Columbia Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for FFY 2008 (SY 2008-2009) Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development: District of Columbia Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for FFY 2008 (SY 2008-2009) Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development: The District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent

More information

5-I: SECTIONS 105 & 105c SCHOOLS OF CHOICE PUPILS

5-I: SECTIONS 105 & 105c SCHOOLS OF CHOICE PUPILS 5-I: SECTIONS 105 & 105c SCHOOLS OF CHOICE PUPILS Participation in a schools of choice program under Sections 105 and/or Section 105c of the State School Aid Act (MCL 388.1705). The district must determine

More information

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2017-2018 THROUGH FY 2021-2022 JOHN WHITE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION July 2016 Louisiana Department of Education FY 18-22 Strategic Plan 1 Table

More information

Kristen DeSalvatore, Coordinator of Federal Reporting. School Year. Important: Due Date is August 7, 2015.

Kristen DeSalvatore, Coordinator of Federal Reporting. School Year. Important: Due Date is August 7, 2015. THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234 OFFICE OF P-12 (SPECIAL EDUCATION) INFORMATION AND REPORTING SERVICES (IRS) 89 WASHINGTON AVENUE RM 881 EBA ALBANY,

More information

Rhode Island Department of Education Office of Student, Community and Academic Supports School Support System Report and Support Plan

Rhode Island Department of Education Office of Student, Community and Academic Supports School Support System Report and Support Plan Rhode Island Department of Education Office of Student, Community and Academic Supports School Support System Report and Support Plan Blackstone Academy Public Charter School February 2016 1 SCHOOL SUPPORT

More information

2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR

2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR 2013-2014 SCHOOL YEAR Virginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards known as the Standards of Learning (SOL) and through annual assessments of student

More information

Indicator 12. Phase I Desk Audit Purpose

Indicator 12. Phase I Desk Audit Purpose Indicator 12 Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays. IDEA Reference: 300.101(b)(1)(i)(ii)

More information

Post-School Outcome Data Collection and Use: Questions State Data Managers Should Ask

Post-School Outcome Data Collection and Use: Questions State Data Managers Should Ask Post-School Outcome Data Collection and Use: Questions State Data Managers Should Ask Prepared by Marsha Brauen Vice President, Westat University of Oregon July 2006 This document was developed by Westat

More information

State of New Jersey 2012-13 41-5460-050 OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL

State of New Jersey 2012-13 41-5460-050 OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL 1 415465 OVERVIEW TECHNICAL SCHOOL 15 ROUTE 57 GRADE SPAN 912 WASHINGTON, NEW JERSEY 78829618 1. This school's academic performance is high when compared to schools across the state. Additionally, its

More information

N.J.A.C. 6A:20, ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS

N.J.A.C. 6A:20, ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS N.J.A.C. 6A:20, ADULT EDUCATION PROGRAMS TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 6A:20-1.1 Purpose and function 6A:20-1.2 Definitions 6A:20-1.3 Age and out-of-school requirements 6A:20-1.4 Certification

More information

Richard Wright PCS for Journalism and Media Arts

Richard Wright PCS for Journalism and Media Arts 1-13 Equity Report What are Equity Reports? The Deputy Mayor for Education, the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE), DC Public Schools (DCPS), the DC Public Charter School Board (PCSB)

More information

Chicago Public Schools Policy Manual

Chicago Public Schools Policy Manual Chicago Public Schools Policy Manual Title: ENROLLMENT AND TRANSFER OF STUDENTS IN THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS Section: 702.1 Board Report: 10-0623-PO1 Date Adopted: June 23, 2010 Policy: THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE

More information

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2014-2015 THROUGH FY 2018-2019 JOHN WHITE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION July 2013 Table of Contents STRATEGIC PLAN OVERVIEW -----------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

School Report Card. School Report Card 2011-2012. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This report contains:

School Report Card. School Report Card 2011-2012. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This report contains: School Report Card District School PHILADELPHIA CITY SD KENSINGTON CULINARY ARTS 20-202 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania School Report Card District AYP Status: Corrective Action II Tenth Year School AYP Status:

More information

Louisiana Special Education Guidance

Louisiana Special Education Guidance Louisiana Special Education Guidance This document outlines how special education policies impact students with disabilities and serves as a reference guide for LEA administrators and high school staff

More information

WRITING S.M.A.R.T. GOALS AND EVALUATING YOUR PLAN

WRITING S.M.A.R.T. GOALS AND EVALUATING YOUR PLAN 1 1 WRITING S.M.A.R.T. GOALS AND EVALUATING YOUR PLAN Session Purposes In this session you will learn strategies to : become an informed stakeholder examine Indicator Data develop SMART goals based on

More information

Individual Education Program (IEP) Form Guidance

Individual Education Program (IEP) Form Guidance The purpose of the IEP document is to provide a written record of the decisions made at an IEP meeting where parent(s) and school personnel jointly make decisions about the educational program for a student

More information

P-20 in Action Michigan s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Student Success through Collaborative Efforts Pk-20

P-20 in Action Michigan s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Student Success through Collaborative Efforts Pk-20 P-20 in Action Michigan s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Student Success through Collaborative Efforts Pk-20 Michigan Community College Association Student Success Applied Research Symposium

More information

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD Highland Park High Twp HSD 3 Highland Park, ILLINOIS GRADES : 9 2 Highland Park High 2 8 ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public

More information

Individualized Education Program (IEP)

Individualized Education Program (IEP) Page 1 of 14 Individualized Education Program (IEP) This file is a PDF of the model form for the Individualized Education Program (IEP). This document is not designed to be completed electronically or

More information

Latinos in Massachusetts Public Schools: Holyoke

Latinos in Massachusetts Public Schools: Holyoke University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Gastón Institute Publications Gastón Institute for Community Development and Public Policy Publications 3-2015 s in Massachusetts Public

More information

N.J.A.C. 6A:14, SPECIAL EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

N.J.A.C. 6A:14, SPECIAL EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS N.J.A.C. 6A:14, SPECIAL EDUCATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 6A:14-1.1 General requirements 6A:14-1.2 District eligibility for assistance under IDEA Part B 6A:14-1.3 Definitions

More information

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY IN UTAH

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY IN UTAH Education Policy Brief August 2012 STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY IN UTAH Utah Legislature Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel HIGHLIGHTS The purpose of the Utah Performance

More information

SPECIAL EDUCATION POLICIES. Oklahoma State Department of Special Education Services 405-521-3351 http://ok.gov/sde/special-education

SPECIAL EDUCATION POLICIES. Oklahoma State Department of Special Education Services 405-521-3351 http://ok.gov/sde/special-education SPECIAL EDUCATION POLICIES Oklahoma State Department of Special Education Services 405-521-3351 http://ok.gov/sde/special-education Special Education Policies Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet

More information

State of New Jersey 2012-13

State of New Jersey 2012-13 1 OVERVIEW GRADE SPAN 912 395262 SCOTCH PLAINS, NEW JERSEY 776 1. This school's academic performance is very high when compared to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance is very

More information

SUBCHAPTER 3. SPECIAL EDUCATION NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 6A EDUCATION

SUBCHAPTER 3. SPECIAL EDUCATION NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 6A EDUCATION CHAPTER 14 SPECIAL EDUCATION NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 6A EDUCATION CHAPTER 14. AUTHORITY: SPECIAL EDUCATION N.J.S.A. 18A:4-15, 18A:7A-1 et seq., 18A:7B-1 et seq., 18A:7C-1 et seq., 18A:40-4,

More information

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD SOUTH PEKIN SD 37 SOUTH PEKIN, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND

More information

What does Indicator 4 address? 9/24/ Equity in suspensions rates 4A: Comparison of SWD to SWOD 4B: Comparison of SWD by race/ethnicity

What does Indicator 4 address? 9/24/ Equity in suspensions rates 4A: Comparison of SWD to SWOD 4B: Comparison of SWD by race/ethnicity Dr. Lanai Jennings Coordinator Office of Special Programs Data Coordinator Professional Development Lorraine Elswick Coordinator Office of Special Programs Complaints Professional Development Dr. Frances

More information

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center District-level data Community Index Data, Year 2004 Each file has one record per Local Education Agency with the percent of students (a)

More information

Training Manual Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services

Training Manual Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services State Performance Plan Indicator 13: Secondary Transition Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services Purpose of this The intent of this document is to

More information

Arizona AYP Terms. Arizona AMOs. Math AMO (percent passing) Reading AMO

Arizona AYP Terms. Arizona AMOs. Math AMO (percent passing) Reading AMO Arizona AYP Terms Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) In accordance with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, the Arizona Department of Education (ADE) has established the following intermediate goals:

More information

OSPI Special Education Technical Assistance Paper No. 5 (TAP 5) REVISED

OSPI Special Education Technical Assistance Paper No. 5 (TAP 5) REVISED OSPI Special Education Technical Assistance Paper No. 5 (TAP 5) REVISED The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Evaluation Procedures Under Part B Note: All TAPS are posted on OSPI s Web

More information

290-8-9.04(3) 290-8-9.04(4)(e)

290-8-9.04(3) 290-8-9.04(4)(e) 290-8-9.04(3) 290-8-9.04(4)(e) (3) Age Requirements. The following age requirements apply to the provision of special education and related services: (a) Preschool children with disabilities by the child

More information

State of New Jersey 2014-15

State of New Jersey 2014-15 Page 1 of 22 OVERVIEW COUNTY VOCATIONAL GRADE SPAN 0912 1.00 313995050 WAYNE, NJ 074702210 The New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) is pleased to present these annual reports of Performance. These

More information

Special Education Program Plan Statement

Special Education Program Plan Statement In effect: January 1, 2001 Updated: November 2011 INTRODUCTION IDEA -2004 The federal special education law, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), was reauthorized in December of 2004

More information

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD 5-8-9-6- MASCOUTAH ELEM SCHOOL MASCOUTAH C U DISTRICT 9 MASCOUTAH, ILLINOIS GRADES : PK K 5 6 MASCOUTAH ELEM SCHOOL ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release

More information

160-5-1-.15 AWARDING UNITS OF CREDIT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER CREDIT AND/OR GRADES.

160-5-1-.15 AWARDING UNITS OF CREDIT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER CREDIT AND/OR GRADES. Code: JBC(4) 160-5-1-.15 AWARDING UNITS OF CREDIT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER CREDIT AND/OR GRADES. (1) DEFINITIONS. (a) Accredited School an elementary, middle or secondary school accredited by or holding

More information

Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students

Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students By: Amanda Heiney, Dianne Lefly and Amy Anderson October 2012 Office of Online & Blended Learning 201 E. Colfax Ave., Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-6897

More information

High School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act

High School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act Connecticut The Policy Context High School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), enacted in 2002, holds states and the schools under their jurisdictions

More information

Accountability and Virginia Public Schools

Accountability and Virginia Public Schools Accountability and Virginia Public Schools 2008-2009 School Year irginia s accountability system supports teaching and learning by setting rigorous academic standards, known as the Standards of Learning

More information

Five-Year Online Strategic Plan Special Education Component

Five-Year Online Strategic Plan Special Education Component Five-Year Online Strategic Plan Special Education Component Annual Application for IDEA, Part B and Preschool and State Aid for Exceptional Children 2011-2012 State Performance Plan Annual Performance

More information

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD 19-22-2-26-5 Metea Valley High Prairie CUSD 2 Aurora, ILLINOIS GRADES : 9 1 11 12 2 1 2 Metea Valley High 1 ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD and federal laws require public school districts to release report

More information

Questions and Answers about Indicator 12 Data Report. to the NC Department of Public Instruction

Questions and Answers about Indicator 12 Data Report. to the NC Department of Public Instruction Questions and Answers about Indicator 12 Data Report to the NC Department of Public Instruction This document addresses frequently asked questions about reporting Indicator 12 data to the NC Department

More information

School Support System Report and Support Plan. Compass Charter School. October 17-18, 2012

School Support System Report and Support Plan. Compass Charter School. October 17-18, 2012 Rhode Island Department of Education Office of Student, Community and Academic Supports School Support System Report and Support Compass Charter School October 17-18, 2012 1 SCHOOL SUPPORT SYSTEM A Collaborative

More information

Intro to Pupil Auditing

Intro to Pupil Auditing Intro to Pupil Auditing Barbette Lane Wexford Missaukee ISD MPAAA Fall Conference Agenda Important Resources Acronyms Audit Preparation Audit Desk Field Audit wrap up Narrative Quality Control Review (QCR)

More information

Introduction to the State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual Performance Report (APR)

Introduction to the State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual Performance Report (APR) Introduction to the State Performance Plan (SPP)/Annual Performance Report (APR) General Supervision System: The systems that are in place to ensure that IDEA Part B requirements are met, e.g., monitoring,

More information

Procedures for Review of Existing Evaluation Data (REED) and Development of an Evaluation Plan April 2009

Procedures for Review of Existing Evaluation Data (REED) and Development of an Evaluation Plan April 2009 Procedures for Review of Existing Evaluation Data (REED) and Development of an Evaluation Plan April 2009 revised 11/09 State Board of Education Kathleen N. Straus, President John C. Austin, Vice President

More information

State of New Jersey 2013-14

State of New Jersey 2013-14 1 OVERVIEW 21314 GRADE SPAN 912 31411 15 PARK AVENUE PATERSON, NJ 751 1. This school's academic performance significantly lags in comparison to schools across the state. Additionally, its academic performance

More information

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF K-12 PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUREAU OF EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION AND STUDENT SERVICES.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DIVISION OF K-12 PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUREAU OF EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION AND STUDENT SERVICES. Return Date: Return to: Administrator Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services ESE Program Administration and Quality Assurance 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 614 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400

More information

Thomas Hehir & Associates. Special Education Follow-up Report

Thomas Hehir & Associates. Special Education Follow-up Report Thomas Hehir & Associates Special Education Follow-up Report September 23, 2008 Next Steps The following are recommendations based on the earlier evaluation of San Diego Unified School District, ongoing

More information

IEP PR-07 Form. Revised Annotations for the. Contents. Using the IEP Form document

IEP PR-07 Form. Revised Annotations for the. Contents. Using the IEP Form document Revised Annotations for the IEP PR-07 Form The Ohio Department of Education, Office for Exceptional Children (ODE/ OEC) revised the individualized education program (IEP) form to align the elements of

More information

Presented by: Teresa Grossi Center on Community Living and Careers Indiana Institute On Disability and Community Indiana University

Presented by: Teresa Grossi Center on Community Living and Careers Indiana Institute On Disability and Community Indiana University Presented by: Teresa Grossi Center on Community Living and Careers Indiana Institute On Disability and Community Indiana University Sponsored by: Center for Exceptional Learners Indiana Department of Education

More information

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and Minnesota

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and Minnesota The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and Minnesota Overview The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) preserves many of the same goals and priorities as No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and NCLB Flexibility Waivers.

More information

The IEP Process: Frequently Asked Questions

The IEP Process: Frequently Asked Questions The IEP Process: Frequently Asked Questions A. DEVELOPMENT OF THE IEP February 2010 Developed for Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Deborah A. Gist Commissioner Rhode Island

More information

Special Education Audit: Organizational, Program, and Service Delivery Review. Yonkers Public Schools. A Report of the External Core Team July 2008

Special Education Audit: Organizational, Program, and Service Delivery Review. Yonkers Public Schools. A Report of the External Core Team July 2008 Special Education Audit: Organizational, Program, and Service Delivery Review Yonkers Public Schools A Report of the External Core Team July 2008 The Collaborative Founded in 1994 Sponsored by the Education

More information

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT PUPIL ACCOUNTING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF STATE AID

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT PUPIL ACCOUNTING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF STATE AID DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SCHOOL DISTRICT PUPIL ACCOUNTING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF STATE AID (By authority conferred on the superintendent of public instruction by sections

More information

Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center

Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center Understanding s Standards of Learning and Graduation For Students with Disabilities No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) require that all students, including

More information

Chapter 10 Federal Accountability

Chapter 10 Federal Accountability Chapter 10 Federal Accountability Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was first passed by Congress in 1965 as

More information

An Introduction to Pennsylvania s Indicator 13 Process

An Introduction to Pennsylvania s Indicator 13 Process Ensuring Effective Secondary Programs and Post-Secondary Outcomes: An Introduction to Pennsylvania s Indicator 13 Process Michael Stoehr, Rosemary Nilles PaTTAN August 3 and 11, 2010 Pennsylvania Training

More information

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System Achievement Performance Indicators Performance Index The Performance Indicators show how many students have a minimum, or proficient, level of knowledge. These indicators are not new to Ohio students or

More information

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES This Procedures Manual ensures the implementation of special education services in Salt Lake City School District. It is to be used in coordination

More information

Annual Performance Report

Annual Performance Report Annual Performance Report February 15, 2013 Submitted May 16, 2013 Clarification Part B State Annual Performance Report (APR) for FFY 2011 Overview of the Annual Performance Report Development: The Department

More information

Fact Sheet. GRADED CATEGORIES Nevada Average State

Fact Sheet. GRADED CATEGORIES Nevada Average State Fact Sheet EDUCATION STATISTICS PREPARED BY TODD M. BUTTERWORTH NOVEMBER 2013 RESEARCH DIVISION LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU This fact sheet provides a brief snapshot of Nevada s K 12 education system and

More information

Special School District. At-Risk Programs Program Evaluation. Special Education Schools, Court Program and Bridges

Special School District. At-Risk Programs Program Evaluation. Special Education Schools, Court Program and Bridges Special School District At-Risk Programs Program Evaluation Special Education Schools, Court Program Paul Bauer, Chair Board : May 24, 2011 Executive Summary As required by the Missouri School Improvement

More information

AWARDING UNITS OF CREDIT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER CREDIT AND/OR GRADES

AWARDING UNITS OF CREDIT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER CREDIT AND/OR GRADES AWARDING UNITS OF CREDIT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER CREDIT AND/OR GRADES The Cherokee County School District s secondary schools shall accept student course credit earned in an accredited school. The school

More information

School Leader s Guide to the 2015 Accountability Determinations

School Leader s Guide to the 2015 Accountability Determinations School Leader s Guide to the 2015 Accountability Determinations This guide is intended to help district and school leaders understand Massachusetts accountability measures, and provides an explanation

More information

Part 12 Statewide Online Education Program Act

Part 12 Statewide Online Education Program Act Part 12 Statewide Online Education Program Act 53A-15-1201 Title. This part is known as the "Statewide Online Education Program Act." 53A-15-1201.5 Program name. (1) The program created under this part

More information

The HiSET Exam and Federal Programs

The HiSET Exam and Federal Programs The HiSET Exam and Federal Programs ETS in response to states interest in continuing to offer a reasonably priced high school equivalency test available in paper-and-pencil format developed the ETS High

More information

THE RIGHT TO SPECIAL EDUCATION IN PENNSYLVANIA: A GUIDE FOR PARENTS

THE RIGHT TO SPECIAL EDUCATION IN PENNSYLVANIA: A GUIDE FOR PARENTS THE RIGHT TO SPECIAL EDUCATION IN PENNSYLVANIA: A GUIDE FOR PARENTS EDUCATION LAW CENTER 1315 Walnut Street, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 Phone: 215-238-6970 Fax: 215-772-3125 TTY: 215-789-2498 1901

More information

CONSOLIDATED STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT: Parts I and II

CONSOLIDATED STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT: Parts I and II CONSOLIDATED STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT: Parts I and II for STATE FORMULA GRANT PROGRAMS under the ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT As amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 For reporting

More information

The Greenville County Schools homepage provides five goals for the school system (www.greenville.k12.sc.us/district/admin/stats/measures.

The Greenville County Schools homepage provides five goals for the school system (www.greenville.k12.sc.us/district/admin/stats/measures. Education Greenville County Schools The Greenville County Schools homepage provides five goals for the school system (www.greenville.k12.sc.us/district/admin/stats/measures.asp): 1. Raise the academic

More information

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Oregon Department of Education

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Oregon Department of Education Every Student Succeeds Act () Oregon Department of Education ESEA Reauthorization The Every Student Succeeds Act () reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and replaces the No Child

More information

Information on House Bill 7069

Information on House Bill 7069 Information on House Bill 7069 FOIL Spring Conference May 6, 2015 (updated May 18, 2015) www.fldoe.org House Bill 7069 has 15 Sections 1. School start date 2. K-3 reading 3. Middle grades requirements

More information