# 1. Sigma algebras. Let A be a collection of subsets of some fixed set Ω. It is called a σ -algebra with the unit element Ω if. lim sup. j E j = E.

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1. Sigma algebras. Let A be a collection of subsets of some fixed set Ω. It is called a σ -algebra with the unit element Ω if. lim sup. j E j = E."

## Transcription

1 Real Analysis, course outline Denis Labutin 1 Measure theory I 1. Sigma algebras. Let A be a collection of subsets of some fixed set Ω. It is called a σ -algebra with the unit element Ω if (a), Ω A ; (b) E A = c E A ; (c) E A, = 1, 2,... = E A. Prove that a σ -algebra A is closed under countable number of the set theoretic operations (,, \, ( ) c ). 2. For a sequence of sets E define lim sup E = {points which belong to infinitely many E }, lim inf = {points which belong to all but finitely many E }. Thus lim sup E lim inf E. If lim sup E = lim inf E = E, then we write lim E = E. (a) Give an example of a sequence {E } for which the inclusion is strict. (b) Show that lim sup E = lim inf E = k= E k, E k. k= (c) Show that if all E are elements of a σ -algebra A, then lim sup E, lim inf E A. (d) Suppose that E 1 E 2. Prove that lim sup E = lim inf E = E. 1

2 (e) Find (and prove) the formula for lim sup E, lim inf E E 1 E 2. in the case 3. Prove that the following collections of sets are σ -algebras. (a) Trivial σ -algebra {, Ω}. (b) Bulean σ -algebra 2 Ω = { all subsets of Ω }. (c) For any E Ω the collection {E, c E,, Ω} (It is called the σ - algebra generated by the set E ). (d) Let D = {D 1, D 2,...} is a countable (disoint) partition of Ω : Ω = D, D i D = if i. The family of all at most countable unions of elements of D (including ) is a σ -algebra. (e) The family of all E Ω such that either E is at most countable or c E is at most countable. 4. New σ -algebras from old. Prove the following statements. (a) Give an example showing that the union of two σ -algebras with the same unit element is not necessarily a σ -algebra. (b) If (A 1, Ω) and (A 2, Ω) are σ -algebras then A 1 A 2 is also a σ - algebra with the same unit element Ω. (c) Similarly, if (A a, Ω) is a σ -algebra for any a A, then is also a σ -algebra with the same unit element Ω. (d) If (A, Ω) is a σ -algebra, and E Ω, then A E = {A E : A A} is a σ -algebra with the unit E Ω = E. (e) If (A, Ω) is a σ -algebra, and Ξ is any fixed set, then A Ξ = {A Ξ: A A} a A is a σ -algebra with the unit Ω Ξ. One should think of Ξ as a group of dummy variables. 5. Property (b) is the basis for the following important construction. Theorem 1 Let C be any collection of subsets of Ω. Then there exists one and only one σ -algebra (A, Ω) such that: (i) C A. (ii) For any σ -algebra (Ã, Ω) containing C we have Ã A. It is called the σ -algebra generated by C and is denoted by σ(c). A a 2

3 For the proof ust define σ(c) def = A α. all σ algebras (Ω,A α) : C A α Hence, the more careful notation should be σ Ω (C). 6. The definition of the σ -algebra generated by a collection of sets is a "somewhat inaccessible concept". Can we write a formula for its elements in terms of the elements of the initial collection? (a) For the collection consisting of a single E Ω find σ E (E), σ Ω (E), and σ({e, E c }). (b) For a disoint countable partition D of Ω, Ω = D, D i D = if i, find σ(d). (c) Prove that σ(σ(c)) = σ(c) for any collection C of subsets. (d) Prove that σ(c) = σ ({F : F = E c, E C}) = σ F : F = E, E C. In general, it is not possible to give a simple formula or a simple constructive description of σ(c). For example, if we take all countable intersections and unions of open and closed interval in R 1 we obtain only a proper subset of B 1. An equivalent descriptive definition of σ(c) can be given using transfinite induction. 7. If (A 1, Ω 1 ) and (A 2, Ω 2 ) are σ -algebras, define A 1 A 2 = {E = E 1 E 2 : E A }, and prove that A 1 A 2 is not necessarily a σ -algebra. Set A 1 A 2 = σ (A 1 A 2 ). The σ -algebra A 1 A 2 with the unit element Ω 1 Ω 2 is called tensor product of A 1 and A Define the important Borel σ -algebra by writing B n = B(R n ) = {σ algebra generated by open sets} = {σ algebra generated by closed sets} = {σ algebra generated by open cubes}. 3

4 For a general metric (or even topological) space X its Borel σ -algebra is B(X) def = {σ algebra generated by open subsets of X}. 9. The product structure of R n leads to a product structure of B n. Theorem 2 B(R 2 ) = B(R 1 ) B(R 1 ). (1.1) Proof. 1. We prover the inclusion B 2 B 1 B 1. Notice that by the definition of the tensor product, the inclusion (a, b) (c, d) B 1 B 1 holds for any simple open rectangle. But B 2 containing such simple rectangles. is the minimal σ -algebra To prove the inclusion B 2 B 1 B 1 we need to show that X Y B 2 for all X, Y B For our X, Y B 1 we notice that X Y = (X R y ) (R x Y ). Hence, to establish the desired statement (1.1) it is sufficient to show that X R y, R x Y B 2. Let us prove the inclusion for the first set. Denote by I the collection of all intervals in R x. Then X R y B 1 R y = σ(i) R y. At the same time, directly from the definitions, σ(i R y ) B 2. Indeed, the σ -algebra in the left hand side is generated by the open rectangles of the form (a, b) (, + ). Hence we ust need to establsh that σ(i) R y σ(i R y ). (1.2) 3. Inclusion (1.2) is established using the so-called principle of good sets. This is the name for a certain type of arguments frequently used in measure theory. Define the collection of good sets to be E def = {E R: E σ(i) and E R y σ(i R y )}. It is easy to check that E is a σ -algebra with the unit element R x. Indeed, by the definition E R y = σ(i) R y σ(i R y ), 4

5 and the intersection of σ -algebras is a σ -algebra. To prove (1.2) we ust need to show that E = σ(i). To verify this equality observe from the definitions that Therefore Since E is a σ -algebra Thus (1.2) is proved. I E σ(i). σ(e) = σ(i). σ(e) = E. Prove that in fact we have σ(i) R y = σ(i R y ) in (1.2). 10. Maps and σ -algebras. Let f : D Ω, and let (A, Ω) be a σ -algebra. The full preimage f 1 (A) def = { f 1 (E): E A } under f is a σ -algebra. (What is its unit element? Prove the statement.) Let (A 0, D) be a σ -algebra. The direct image f(a 0 ) = {f(e): E A 0 } is not always a σ -algebra. (Give an example.) Define the push forward f # (A 0 ), f # (A 0 ) = {S Ω: f 1 (S) A 0 }. Is it a σ -algebra? (Prove the statement, or give a counterexample.) 11. A function f : Ω R 1 is A -measurable if f 1 (B 1 ) A. That is, f 1 (E) A E B 1. Equivalently, the full preimage of the σ -algebra B(R) under f subalgebra of A. Prove that a function f is measurable if and only if is a f 1 ((, t)) A t. The last condition is easier to check in practice. For the proof of the "if" part one can argue using the principle of good sets. The collection of the good sets in this case is E = { E R: E B 1 and f 1 (E) A } = B 1 f # (A). Then notice that E is a σ -algebra, E B 1, and that (, t) E for any t. The statement now follows from the properties of the generating operation σ. 5

6 12. Similarly a complex valued function F : Ω C is A -measurable if f 1 (E) A E B 2. Equivalently, F 1 (B 2 ) A (the full preimage of the σ -algebra B(C) = B 2 under F is a subalgebra of A ). Prove that such F is measurable if and only if f = Re(F ) and g = Im(F ) are real valued measurable functions. 13. We will need measurable functions with the values in R {+ }, or R {+ } { }, or C { }. Hence we need to define Borel σ - algebras on these sets. 14. One point compactification of R or C is defined to be the set R = R { } (or C = C { } ) equipped with the following modified topology. A set O R is open if either O R is open, or O = R \ K for some compactum K R. Show that (a) R is homeomorphic to the circle S 1 with the topology induced by its inclusion in R 2 ; (b) R is indeed compact. That is, any open cover of R has a finite subcover. The definition for C is similar. The corresponding topology makes C homeomorphic to the sphere S 2 with the topology induced by its inclusion in R 3 (Riemann sphere). The two points compactification of R is defined to be the set R = R {+ } { } (disoint union) equipped with the following modified topology. A set O R is open if either O R is open, or O = (R \ K) [inf K, + ) {+ } for some compactum K R, or O = (R \ K) (, sup K] { } for some compactum K R. Show that in this case (a) R is homeomorphic to [ π/2, π/2] with the topology from R ; (b) R is indeed compact. 15. The extended Borel σ -algebra B 1 = B( R) is the σ -algebra generated by all open sets of the corresponding R. The definition of B( C) is similar. Let R = R { } {+ }. Prove in this case that B 1 coincides with the σ -algebra generated by all intervals (t, + ], t R. In other words, B 1 is generated by the family {x R: x > t}, t R. 6

7 16. We say that is measurable if f : Ω R f 1 ( B 1 ) A. That is, we replaced in the earlier definition B 1 by B 1. Prove that f is measurable if and only if {x Ω: f(x) < t} = f 1 ([, t)) A t R. 17. There will be no differences in the arguments for R -valued and R -valued functions. In what follows we start using the abbreviated notations: {f < t} def = {x Ω: f(x) < t}. 18. Theorem 3 Let f, g f 1,... be A -measurbale functions for some fixed σ -algebra A. Then: (i) If φ: R 1 R 1 (ii) If Φ: R 2 R 1 is B 1 -measurable then φ f is A -measurbale. is continuous then Φ(f, g) is A -measurbale. (iii) All A -measurable functions form a linear vector space over R. (iv)functions are A -measurbale. sup f n, n inf f n, lim sup f n, n n lim inf f n n 19. Let (A, Ω) be a σ -algebra. In the integration theory an important role will be played by simple functions. A function f is called simple if it is a finite linear combination of characteristic functions of measurable sets: f(x) = N c χ E (x), x Ω, with some E 1,..., E N A, c 1,...,N R. Show that simple functions are measurable. 20. The important fact is that all measurable functions are built from the simple functions through the pointwise limits. More precisely, any positive A -measurable function is a monotone pointwise limit of the simple functions. This is is the content of the following basic approximation theorem. Theorem 4 (i) Let f : Ω R, f 0 be an A -measurable function. Then there exists a sequence of simple functions {ϕ n } such that 0 ϕ 1 ϕ n ϕ n+1 f in Ω, ϕ n (x) f(x), n, for all x Ω. 7

8 (ii) Let f : Ω R be an arbitrary A -measurable function. Then there exists a sequence of simple functions {ϕ n } such that ϕ n f in Ω, ϕ n (x) f(x), n, for all x Ω. Proof. 1. In the proof we will use the dyadic system of intervals [ ) (N) k 1 k = 2 N, k 2 N, k, N Z. For each fixed N the dyadic intervals { (N) k } k Z form the disoint partition of R into intervals of length 2 N. Dyadic intervals of different length have the following property: for M > N and for any k and either (N) k (M) = or (N) k (M). Hence either two dyadic intervals are disoint, or one sits inside the other. The dyadic system is an important tool in real analysis. 2. For the proof of (i) we define { E (N) k 1 k = 2 N f < k } ( ) 2 N = f 1 (N) k, k, N = 1, 2,..., The sets E (N) k are measurable because f is A -measurable. Now for N = 1, 2,... define N2 N ϕ N (x) = k 1 2 N χ (x) + Nχ E (N) {f N} (x). k 3. First, we show that k=1 ϕ N ϕ N+1. Fix any x 0 Ω. We must have ϕ N (x 0 ) = k/2 N for some k = 0,..., N2 N. This implies that k/2 N f(x 0 ). By the dyadic construction two and only two cases are possible: either or k 2 N = 2 N+1 f(x 0) < N+1, N+1 f(x 0). 8

9 By the definitions this leads to the following alternative for ϕ N+1 : either ϕ N+1 (x 0 ) = ϕ N (x 0 ), or ϕ N+1 (x 0 ) ( + 1)/2 N+1 > ϕ N (x 0 ). In both cases ϕ N (x 0 ) ϕ N+1 (x 0 ). Next, we show that ϕ N (x 0 ) f(x 0 ), N. First assume f(x 0 ) = +. Then by the construction ϕ N (x 0 ) = N for all N, and the statement follows. Next assume that f(x 0 ) R. By the properties of the dyadic system there exists a unique sequence of intervals { (N) k N }, N = 1, 2,..., such that (1) k 1 (2) k 2 f(x 0 ). Then for the sequence of the left end-points of (N) k N Also the length of (N) k N k N 1 2 N = ϕ N (x 0 ). we have is 2 N 0, as N. Consequently ϕ N (x 0 ) f(x 0 ) as N. 4. For the proof of (ii) split f = f + f, f ± 0, and apply part (i) to f + and f separately. 21. More generally, for two σ -algebras (A i, Ω i ), i = 1, 2, a map F : Ω 1 Ω 2 is called A 1 - A 2 measurable if F 1 (A 2 ) A 1. That is, F 1 (A 2 ) is a subalgebra of A 1. According to this definition, the A -measurability of a function, say, f : Ω R means that the map f : Ω R is A - B 1 measurable. The σ -algebras B n are canonical σ -algebras associated with R n, and we usually omit B s from the notations for the maps into R n. 22. Positive measures. A positive measure (or, simply, a measure) on a σ -algebra is a map µ: A [0, + ] satisfying two conditions: µ( ) = 0, and µ = A µ (A ) 9

10 for any disoint countable family {A }, A A. A measure µ is called finite if µ(ω) <. A measure µ is called σ -finite if Ω = D with D A, µ(d ) <. The triple (Ω, A, µ) is called the measure space. 23. Examples of measures. The Dirac mass δ p at a point p Ω is a finite measure on 2 Ω (and consequently on any other σ -algebra) defined by { 1 if p E δ p (E) = 0 if p E. The counting measure # is a measure on 2 Ω other σ -algebra) defined by (and consequently on any #(E) = { number of elements of E if E is finite + if E is infinite. The nontrivial example is the Lebesgue measure in R n studied later. which will be Proposition 5 The following statements hold for elements of A : (a) µ( ) = 0 ; (b) µ(a B) + µ(a B) = µ(a) + µ(b) ; (c) µ(a) µ(b) for A B ; (d) for any sequence A 1, A 2,... µ µ(a ); A (e) if A 1 A 2, then lim µ(a ) = µ( lim A ) = µ A ; (f) if A 1 A 2 and µ(a 1 ) < +, then lim µ(a ) = µ( lim A ) = µ A. 10

11 Part (b) implies that µ(a B) = µ(a) + µ(b) µ(a B), provided µ(a), µ(b) <. 24. A measure µ is called complete if { } e E, E A, µ(e) = 0 = e A (and hence µ(e) = 0). Every measure can be extended to a complete by adding all subsets of all sets of measure 0. Formally: Theorem 6 For (Ω, A, µ) define a larger collection of subsets Then: A = {E S : E A, and S F, F A, µ(f ) = 0}. (i) A is a σ -algebra; (ii) if on A we set µ(e S) = µ(e), then µ is a correctly defined complete measure on A which is an extension of µ, µ A = µ. This is from Rudin, The difference between µ and µ is in the underlying σ -algebras. According to the definition µ and µ have the same range. By tradition µ is denoted by the same letter µ. The σ -algebra A from the theorem is called the completion of A with respect to µ. Thus the notation is: (Ω, A, µ) is the completion of (Ω, A, µ). 25. Measures and maps. Let (A 1, Ω 1 ), (A 2, Ω 2 ) be σ -algebras, let µ be a measure on A 1, and let f : Ω 1 Ω 2 be an A 1 - A 2 measurable map. That is, f 1 (A 2 ) is a subalgebra of A 1. Hence we can define the function f µ on A 2 by writing (f µ)(e) def = µ ( f 1 (E) ), E A 2. Prove that f µ is a measure on A 2. It is called the push forward of µ under f. 26. The following question arises frequently in different areas of mathematics (functional analysis, probability theory, random processes,...). Given a σ -algebra (Ω, A) is it possible to built a measure with some given properties? There is no general answer to such general question. Individual construction is needed for each individual case, and it depends on the properties we need and on the structure of (Ω, A). In the next sections we will be dealing with one particular case. It is of fundamental importance in analysis, and historically was at the origin of the modern real analysis. 11

12 27. Lebesgue measure on R n. Does there exist a measure on (R n, B n ) which coincides with the usual volume for nice sets? The answer is "yes". Such measure is called Lebesgue measure. It is given by a nontrivial construction in several steps outlined below. Lebesgue outer measure (first step in construction of the Lebesgue measure). For a closed rectangle define the number R = [a 1, b 1 ] [a n, b n ] vol(r) = b 1 a 1 b n a n. It is not difficult to prove that if the rectangles R 1,..., R N are disoint, and if the rectangle R satisfies R = (, )R 1 R N then vol(r) = (, )vol(r 1 ) + + vol(r N ). For any E R n of E, by writing define µ (E) [0, + ], the exterrior (outer) measure µ (E) = inf vol(r ), where the infimum is taken over all coverings of E by finite and countable number of R. For example, from the definition it directly follows that µ ({x 0 }) = 0. The outer measure is not a measure. We list more properties of µ. Proposition 7 The outer measure µ : 2 Rn [0, + ] enoys the following properties: (i) µ ( ) = 0 ; (ii) µ (E 1 ) µ (E 2 ) if E 1 E 2 ; (iii) semiadditivity holds, that is µ E µ (E ); (iv) µ (R) = vol(r) for any rectangle R. Property (iv) is important. 28. A set E R n is called (Lebesgue) measurable if for all A and B such that A E, B R n \ E (1.3) 12

13 we have µ (A B) = µ (A) + µ (B). (1.4) We say that A and B are separated by E if (1.3) holds. The equivalent definition: E R n is measurable if µ (X) = µ (X E) + µ (X E c ) X R n. We call X in this condition a test set. 29. The main theorem states that the measurable sets form a σ -algebra denoted by L n (the Lebesgue σ -algebra of R n ), that µ is a complete measure on it, and that B n L n. Theorem 8 The following asserions hold: (i) µ (N) = 0 = N is measurable; (ii) all measurable sets form a σ -algebra denoted by L(R n ), or L n, with the unit element R n ; (iii) on this σ -algebra µ is a complete measure. Hence if {E } is a sequence of disoint measurable sets, then µ E = µ (E ); (iv) every rectangle R is measurable; (v) every Borel set is measurable. The σ -algebra L n is called Lebesgue σ -algebra. For E L n we call µ (E) the Lebesgue measure of E, and denote it by λ n (E) or by E. Clearly λ n is a σ -finite measure on L n Part (i) means that is a complete measure on L n. Part (iv) with Proposition 5 give λ n( ) [a 1, b 1 ] [a n, b n ] = b 1 a 1 b n a n. Part (v) means that B n L n. Consequently there does exist a nontrivial measure on B n generealising the usual area or volume. How big is L n \B n? We will see later that L n differs from B n essentially by the sets of the Lebesgue measure zero, and that λ n is the completion of λ n Bn. 30. Proof of (i)-(iii) in Theorem 8 is actually axiomatic and does not use any property of R n. The arguments there constitute the socalled Caratheodory construction of the measure from an outer measure. Caratheodory construction in its abstract form is a basic tool in measure theory and its applications. We present it below. Parts (iv), (v) in Theorem 8 are specific to R n. 13

14 31. Caratheodory construction. Suppose Ω is a fixed set. Suppose a function γ : 2 Ω [0, + ] is given, which satisfies the following axioms: (a) γ( ) = 0 ; (b) γ(e) γ(f ) if E F Ω (monotonicity); (c) γ γ(e ) (semiadditivity). E Such γ is called an outer measure on Ω. As we showed above the Lebesgue outer measure µ fits these axioms. We say that E Ω is measurable (with respect to γ ) if γ(x) = γ(x E) + γ(x E c ) X Ω. (1.5) then this is the definition of the Lebesgue mea- For example, if γ = µ surable set. Theorem 9 The following asserions hold: (i) γ(n) = 0 = N is measurable; (ii) all measurable sets form a σ -algebra denoted by Γ with the unit element Ω ; (iii) the restriction γ Γ to this σ -algebra is a complete measure. Proof of (i). This is easy. Fix any test set X Ω. By the monotonicity At the same time Hence Part (i) is proved. 0 γ(x N) γ(n) = 0. γ(x N c ) γ(x) γ(x N) + γ(x N c ) = γ(x N c ). γ(x) = γ(x N c ) = γ(x N c ) + γ(x N). Proof of (ii) and (iii) 1. Denote by Γ the family of all measurable subsets of Ω. Directly from (1.5) it follows that, Ω Γ, and E Γ = E c Γ. 14

15 Thus to show that Γ is a σ -algebra we only need to prove that the union of a countable family of measurable sets is also measurable. We do this below. 2. If E 1,2 are measurable then E 1 E 2 is also measurable. In fact, fix any test set X Ω. By the monotonicity it suffices to establish γ(x) γ(x (E 1 E 2 )) + γ(x (E 1 E 2 ) c ). For the second term we have X (E 1 E 2 ) c = X E c 1 E c 2. To represent the first term X (E 1 E 2 ) we split E 1 E 2 pieces: E 1 E 2 = E 1 (E 2 \ E 1 ) = E 1 (E1 c E 2 ) From the monotonicity we deduce that into disoint γ(x (E 1 E 2 )) + γ(x (E 1 E 2 ) c ) = γ((x E 1 ) (X E c 1 E 2 )) +γ(x E c 1 E c 2) γ(x E 1 ) + γ(x E c 1 E 2 ) +γ((x E c 1) E c 2) = γ(x E 1 ) + γ(x E c 1), where we used E 2 Γ in the last step. Now using E 1 Γ we conclude that γ(x E 1 ) + γ(x E c 1) = γ(x), and consequently γ(x (E 1 E 2 )) + γ(x (E 1 E 2 ) c ) γ(x). Therefore E 1 E 2 By induction is measurable. N E, N E are measurable if all E are, with any N < +. Now we know that a finite number of operations applied to a finite number of measurable sets leads to a measurable set. 3. To prove (ii) we need to show that for A 1, A 2,... Γ we have A Γ. Without loss of generality we may assume that A i A =, i. 15

16 In fact, set E 1 = A 1 E 2 = A 2 \ A 1 E 3 = A 3 \ (A 2 A 1 ) E n = A n \ (A n 1 A 1 ) Then E n Γ since it is obtained from A 1,..., A n by a finite number of operations. Moreover E is a disoint sequence with E = A. Next, for our disoint family {A } we define A = n A, B n = A. To show that A Γ fix any test set X Ω. Since B n Γ we derive that γ(x) = γ(x B n ) + γ(x B c n) γ(x B n ) + γ(x A c ), where on the last step we used the monotonicity for Bn c A c. Observe that since our disoint A are measurable then Consequently γ(x B n ) = γ((x B n ) A n ) + γ((x B n ) A c n) = γ(x A n ) + γ(x B n 1 ) = γ(x A n ) + γ(x A n 1 ) + γ(x B n 2 ) = n = γ(x A ). γ(x) n γ(x A ) + γ(x A c ). Letting n and using the semiadditivity we discover that γ(x) γ(x A ) + γ(x A c ) γ (X A ) + γ(x A c ) = γ(x A) + γ(x A c ) γ(x). 16

17 Hence A Γ, which shows that Γ is a σ -algebra. Test the last formula with X = A and notice that A A = A, A A c =. The result is This proves (iii) γ A = γ(a ). 32. Proof of Theorem 8 (iv) and (v). 1. Part (v) follows directly from (iv) since B n is generated by all rectangles. The rest of the proof is devoted to establishing (iv). 2. For any E R n and any δ > 0 define µ δ(e) def = inf vol(r ): E R, diam(r ) < δ. In these notations we have µ (E) = µ (E) for the Lebesgue outer measure. It is easy to show by splitting the rectangles that µ (E) = µ δ(e) E R n, δ > 0. Hence, when calculating the outer measure of a set we can assume that each of the covering rectangles has the diameter less than δ, δ > Now take any bounded rectangle R, 0 < vol(r) <. Fix any test set X R n. To prove that R L n we shall show that µ (X R) + µ (X R c ) µ (X) + ε ε > 0. (1.6) Take any ε > 0. For this ε find δ > 0, and a rectangle R δ R, such that dist(r δ, R c ) > 10δ but µ (R \ R δ ) < ε. We can easily do this since R \ R δ is ust a finite union of rectangles with one dimension of the order δ, and the other n 1 dimensions of the order diam(r). We start estimating the right hand side in (1.6): µ (X R) + µ (X R c ) µ (X R δ ) + µ (X (R \ R δ )) +µ (X R c ) µ (X R δ ) + µ (X R c ) + ε. (1.7) The advantage of (1.7) is that the sets in the last line are separated by the distance 10δ > In order to continue estimating (1.6) we take an almost optimal cover of our X by R with small diameters. Namely, by the definitions there exist a sequence {R } such that X R, vol(r ) < µ (X) + ε, diam(r ) < δ. 17

18 We partition {R } into 3 groups: I. all R : R X R δ, denoted by R (I) II. all R : R X R c, denoted by R (II) III. all other R, denoted by R (III). The groups are disoint. In fact, this is trivial for group III. Groups I and II are also disoint. Indeed, seeking a contradiction suppose that some R J is in group I and in group II. Then we can find points x, y R J such that x R δ and y R c. But then x y diam(r J ) < δ and x y dist(r δ, R c ) > 10δ, which is a clear contradiction. Next, observe that group I covers X R δ, and group II covers X R c, R (I) (X R δ ), R (II) (X R c ). Consequently µ (X R δ ) µ (X R c ) ( vol ( vol R (I) R (II) ), ). Hence, we can continue (1.7) to derive that µ (X R) + µ (X R c ) ( vol R (I) ) + ( vol R (II) ) + ε vol(r ) (the sum over all 3 groups) +ε µ (X) + 2ε. Therefore we established (1.6), and Theorem 8 is now proved. 33. Prove that λ n ({x 0 }) = 0, λ 2 ([0, 1] {1}) = 0, λ 2 ({(x, y): x = y}). 34. Let f : [0, 1] R be a continuous function. Let Γ(f) be its graph viewed as a subset of R 2. Prove that λ 2 (Γ(f)) = Accepting the Axiom of Choice, it is possible to construct E R which is not Lebesgue measurable. Namely, define the equivalence reation x 18

19 36. Lebesgue and Borel sets. Borel algebra B n contains all open and all closed sets. We introduce slightly more general classes of sets F σ, G δ B n. Here a set E has the type F σ if it is a countable union of closed sets, E = C, C is closed. A set E has the type G δ if it is a countable intersection of open sets, E = O, O is open. It follows directly that closed sets are F σ sets and open sets are G δ sets. It requires a little extra effort to show that any open set is an F σ set, and any closed set is a G δ set. Theorem 10 The following is true: (i) for every measurable set E E = (ii) set E is measurable if and only if inf O ; O E,O open E = H \ Z for some H G δ and Z such that Z = 0; (iii) set E is measurable if and only if E = H Z for some H F σ and Z such that Z = 0; (iv) for every measurable set E E = sup C. C E,C closed Therefore the σ -algebra of Lebesgue measurable sets is bigger than B n only by the sets of Lebesgue measure 0. We introduce the family of null-sets, def N n = {N R n : λ n (N) = 0}. From (ii) we derive that for any N N n there exists H B n such that N H and H = 0. At the same time we deduce from (iii) that Hence L n = B n N n. (1.8) 19

20 the Lebesgue σ -algebra is the completion of the Borel σ -algebra with respect to the Lebesgue measure, (L n, λ n ) = ( B n, λ n Bn ). 37. As we saw above the null sets play an important role in the theory. Every countable set is a null set. Example of the Cantor set C R, C N 1, shows that the converse is not true. 38. Tensor products of Lebesgue σ -algebras. Theorem 10 can be used to clarify the relation between L n and L 1 L 1. We have proved earlier that B 2 = B 1 B 1. For the Lebesgue σ -algebra the answer is Consequently (1.8) and the inclusions L 1 L 1 L 2. (1.9) B 2 = B 1 B 1 L 1 L 1 L 2 imply that L 2 is the completion of L 1 L 1 with respect to λ 2, `L2, λ 2 = `L 1 L 1, λ 2 L1 L The key role in the proof of (1.9) will be played by the following property of the null-sets: if E N k then µ (E R l ) = 0, and hence E F L k+l with λ k+l (E F ) = 0 for any F R l. (Prove this.) Then we deduce from (1.8) that L 1 L 1 = σ (B 1 N 1 ) (B 1 N 1 ) σ((b 1 B 1 ) N 2 ) σ((b 1 B 1 ) N 2 ) = σ(b 2 N 2 ) = σ(l 2 ) = L To see that L 1 L 1 L 2 we take the Lebesgue non-measurable set Λ R 1, and write E 0 = Λ {y 0 }. Since λ 1 ({y 0 }) = 0, then E 0 R 2 is λ 2 -measurable, and λ 2 (E 0 ) = 0. We claim that E 0 / L 1 L 1. (1.10) 41. We will need the following abstract statement. It is also interesting in its own right. Proposition 11 Let C be any collection of subsets of a fixed set Ω. Let F set. Then σ Ω (C) F = σ Ω F (C F ). be any That is, for a given collection of sets we can proceed in two ways. The first way is to take the σ -algebra generated by it, and then intersect this σ -algebra with a fixed set F. (That is to intersect its every element with F.) The second way is to intersect the collection with F, and then take the σ -algebra generated by this new collection of subsets of Ω F. We claim that the resulting σ -algebra is the same for both procedures. 20

21 It is useful to recall that in the proof of Theorem 2 we have encountered a similar statement. There we essentially proved that for a collection C Ω and a set Ξ one has σ Ω (C) Ξ = σ Ω Ξ (C Ξ). Proof. 1. Inclusion σ Ω (C) F σ Ω F (C F ) is easy to see. Indeed, σ Ω (C) F is a σ -algebra with the unit element Ω F containing the collection C F. But σ Ω F (C F ) is the minimal such σ -algebra. 2. We prove the inclusion σ Ω (C) F σ Ω F (C F ). For that we will argue using the principle of good sets. Define the collection of good sets E def = {E Ω: E σ Ω (C) and E F σ Ω F (C F )}. We claim that (E, Ω) is a σ -algebra and hence E = σ Ω (E). (1.11) Accepting the claim for a moment we at once conclude the proof of the proposition. Indeed, the definition of E implies that C E σ Ω (C), and that E F σ Ω F (C F ). Apply the σ Ω operation to the first chain of inclusions we obtain by (1.11) E = σ Ω (E) = σ Ω (C). Substitute this into the second inclusion to discover which concludes the proof. σ Ω (C) F σ Ω F (C F ), It is left to establish (1.11). Clearly, Ω E. Suppose E E. To verify that E c E we observe at once that E c σ Ω (C). Moreover, E F σ Ω F (C F ) implies Hence E c E. E c F = (Ω \ E) F = (Ω F ) \ (E F ) σ Ω F (C F ). Finally, take a sequence of sets {E }, E E. At once from the definition of E [ E σ Ω (C). Moreover, by the same definition E F σ Ω F (C F ) for any. But then 0 [ E A F = [ (E F ) σ Ω F (C F ). This proves (1.11). 42. Now we prove the actual validity of (1.10). Define L 0 = {(x, y) R 2 : y = y 0 } = R {y 0 }, so E 0 L 0. From Proposition 11 we deduce at once that (L 1 L 1 ) L 0 = σ(l 1 L 1 ) L 0 = σ ((L 1 L 1 ) L 0 ) = σ(l 1 {y 0 }) = L 1 {y 0 }, where the last step follows from the fact that L 1 {y 0 } is a σ -algebra with the unit element L 0. Therefore (1.10) holds since Λ / L 1. 21

### Our goal first will be to define a product measure on A 1 A 2.

1. Tensor product of measures and Fubini theorem. Let (A j, Ω j, µ j ), j = 1, 2, be two measure spaces. Recall that the new σ -algebra A 1 A 2 with the unit element is the σ -algebra generated by the

### Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure.

Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure. October 19, 2010 Today s lecture will be devoted to Lebesgue measure, a creation of Henri Lebesgue, in his thesis, one of the most famous theses in the history of mathematics.

### CHAPTER 5. Product Measures

54 CHAPTER 5 Product Measures Given two measure spaces, we may construct a natural measure on their Cartesian product; the prototype is the construction of Lebesgue measure on R 2 as the product of Lebesgue

### REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE

REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1.4.1 Introduction We will expand on Section 1.4 of Folland s text, which covers abstract outer measures also called exterior measures).

### Ri and. i=1. S i N. and. R R i

The subset R of R n is a closed rectangle if there are n non-empty closed intervals {[a 1, b 1 ], [a 2, b 2 ],..., [a n, b n ]} so that R = [a 1, b 1 ] [a 2, b 2 ] [a n, b n ]. The subset R of R n is an

### Basic Measure Theory

Basic Measure Theory Heinrich v. Weizsäcker Revised Translation 2004/2008 Fachbereich Mathematik Technische Universität Kaiserslautern 2 Measure Theory (October 20, 2008) Preface The aim of this text is

### 1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.

1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set. Basic Topology Written by Men-Gen Tsai email: b89902089@ntu.edu.tw Proof: For any element x of the empty set, x is also an element of every set since

### MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES Contents 1. Random variables and measurable functions 2. Cumulative distribution functions 3. Discrete

### Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009)

1 Distance J Muscat 1 Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009) (A revised and expanded version of these notes are now published by Springer.) 1 Distance A metric space can be thought of

### 6.4 The Infinitely Many Alleles Model

6.4. THE INFINITELY MANY ALLELES MODEL 93 NE µ [F (X N 1 ) F (µ)] = + 1 i

### Mathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition

Mathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition Phoebus J. Dhrymes 1 July 2012 1 c Phoebus J. Dhrymes, 2012. Preliminary material; not to be cited or disseminated without the author s permission. 2 Contents

### The Lebesgue Measure and Integral

The Lebesgue Measure and Integral Mike Klaas April 12, 2003 Introduction The Riemann integral, defined as the limit of upper and lower sums, is the first example of an integral, and still holds the honour

### Notes on metric spaces

Notes on metric spaces 1 Introduction The purpose of these notes is to quickly review some of the basic concepts from Real Analysis, Metric Spaces and some related results that will be used in this course.

### INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS

INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS STEVEN P. LALLEY AND ANDREW NOBEL Abstract. It is shown that there are no consistent decision rules for the hypothesis testing problem

### Vector Spaces II: Finite Dimensional Linear Algebra 1

John Nachbar September 2, 2014 Vector Spaces II: Finite Dimensional Linear Algebra 1 1 Definitions and Basic Theorems. For basic properties and notation for R N, see the notes Vector Spaces I. Definition

### Recursion Theory in Set Theory

Contemporary Mathematics Recursion Theory in Set Theory Theodore A. Slaman 1. Introduction Our goal is to convince the reader that recursion theoretic knowledge and experience can be successfully applied

### No: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics

No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results

### Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis

Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis P. Cannarsa & T. D Aprile Dipartimento di Matematica Università di Roma Tor Vergata cannarsa@mat.uniroma2.it daprile@mat.uniroma2.it aa 2006/07 Contents

### Open and Closed Sets

Open and Closed Sets Definition: A subset S of a metric space (X, d) is open if it contains an open ball about each of its points i.e., if x S : ɛ > 0 : B(x, ɛ) S. (1) Theorem: (O1) and X are open sets.

### {f 1 (U), U F} is an open cover of A. Since A is compact there is a finite subcover of A, {f 1 (U 1 ),...,f 1 (U n )}, {U 1,...

44 CHAPTER 4. CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS In Calculus we often use arithmetic operations to generate new continuous functions from old ones. In a general metric space we don t have arithmetic, but much of it

### PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS

PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS This material assumes that you are already familiar with the real number system and the representation of the real numbers as points on the real line. I.1. THE NATURAL NUMBERS

### Lebesgue Measure on R n

8 CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets

### 3. Mathematical Induction

3. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 83 3. Mathematical Induction 3.1. First Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P (n) be a predicate with domain of discourse (over) the natural numbers N = {0, 1,,...}. If (1)

### RANDOM INTERVAL HOMEOMORPHISMS. MICHA L MISIUREWICZ Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis

RANDOM INTERVAL HOMEOMORPHISMS MICHA L MISIUREWICZ Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis This is a joint work with Lluís Alsedà Motivation: A talk by Yulij Ilyashenko. Two interval maps, applied

### SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576

SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576 SOLUTIONS BY OLIVIER MARTIN 13 #5. Let T be the topology generated by A on X. We want to show T = J B J where B is the set of all topologies J on X with A J. This amounts

### Finite dimensional topological vector spaces

Chapter 3 Finite dimensional topological vector spaces 3.1 Finite dimensional Hausdorff t.v.s. Let X be a vector space over the field K of real or complex numbers. We know from linear algebra that the

### Mikołaj Krupski. Regularity properties of measures on compact spaces. Instytut Matematyczny PAN. Praca semestralna nr 1 (semestr zimowy 2010/11)

Mikołaj Krupski Instytut Matematyczny PAN Regularity properties of measures on compact spaces Praca semestralna nr 1 (semestr zimowy 2010/11) Opiekun pracy: Grzegorz Plebanek Regularity properties of measures

### Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

### x if x 0, x if x < 0.

Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the

### MEASURE AND INTEGRATION. Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich

MEASURE AND INTEGRATION Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich 12 May 2016 ii Preface This book is based on notes for the lecture course Measure and Integration held at ETH Zürich in the spring semester 2014. Prerequisites

### FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Cosets and the Quotient Space Any vector space is an abelian group under the operation of vector addition. So, if you are have studied

### SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3 Fall 2008 III. Spaces with special properties III.1 : Compact spaces I Problems from Munkres, 26, pp. 170 172 3. Show that a finite union of compact subspaces

### Extension of measure

1 Extension of measure Sayan Mukherjee Dynkin s π λ theorem We will soon need to define probability measures on infinite and possible uncountable sets, like the power set of the naturals. This is hard.

### 1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1

Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or

### Practice with Proofs

Practice with Proofs October 6, 2014 Recall the following Definition 0.1. A function f is increasing if for every x, y in the domain of f, x < y = f(x) < f(y) 1. Prove that h(x) = x 3 is increasing, using

### and s n (x) f(x) for all x and s.t. s n is measurable if f is. REAL ANALYSIS Measures. A (positive) measure on a measurable space

RAL ANALYSIS A survey of MA 641-643, UAB 1999-2000 M. Griesemer Throughout these notes m denotes Lebesgue measure. 1. Abstract Integration σ-algebras. A σ-algebra in X is a non-empty collection of subsets

### Induction. Margaret M. Fleck. 10 October These notes cover mathematical induction and recursive definition

Induction Margaret M. Fleck 10 October 011 These notes cover mathematical induction and recursive definition 1 Introduction to induction At the start of the term, we saw the following formula for computing

### Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao,David Tse Note 11

CS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2009 Satish Rao,David Tse Note Conditional Probability A pharmaceutical company is marketing a new test for a certain medical condition. According

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights

### Chapter 1 - σ-algebras

Page 1 of 17 PROBABILITY 3 - Lecture Notes Chapter 1 - σ-algebras Let Ω be a set of outcomes. We denote by P(Ω) its power set, i.e. the collection of all the subsets of Ω. If the cardinality Ω of Ω is

### Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis

Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis Erhan Çinlar Robert J. Vanderbei February 2, 2000 Contents Sets and Functions 1 1 Sets................................... 1 Subsets.............................

### I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called

### Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................

### Change of Continuous Random Variable

Change of Continuous Random Variable All you are responsible for from this lecture is how to implement the Engineer s Way (see page 4) to compute how the probability density function changes when we make

### On fractional parts of powers of real numbers close to 1

On fractional parts of powers of real numbers close to 1 Yann BUGEAUD and Niolay MOSHCHEVITIN Abstract We prove that there exist arbitrarily small positive real numbers ε such that every integral power

### The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992), 33 37) Bart de Smit

The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free Bart de Smit The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992),

### Duality of linear conic problems

Duality of linear conic problems Alexander Shapiro and Arkadi Nemirovski Abstract It is well known that the optimal values of a linear programming problem and its dual are equal to each other if at least

### CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY

CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY Topology, sometimes referred to as the mathematics of continuity, or rubber sheet geometry, or the theory of abstract topological spaces, is all of these, but, above all, it is

### DISINTEGRATION OF MEASURES

DISINTEGRTION OF MESURES BEN HES Definition 1. Let (, M, λ), (, N, µ) be sigma-finite measure spaces and let T : be a measurable map. (T, µ)-disintegration is a collection {λ y } y of measures on M such

### MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0-534-40596-7. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column

### A Problem With The Rational Numbers

Solvability of Equations Solvability of Equations 1. In fields, linear equations ax + b = 0 are solvable. Solvability of Equations 1. In fields, linear equations ax + b = 0 are solvable. 2. Quadratic equations

### Chapter 1. Metric Spaces. Metric Spaces. Examples. Normed linear spaces

Chapter 1. Metric Spaces Metric Spaces MA222 David Preiss d.preiss@warwick.ac.uk Warwick University, Spring 2008/2009 Definitions. A metric on a set M is a function d : M M R such that for all x, y, z

### THE PRIME NUMBER THEOREM

THE PRIME NUMBER THEOREM NIKOLAOS PATTAKOS. introduction In number theory, this Theorem describes the asymptotic distribution of the prime numbers. The Prime Number Theorem gives a general description

### 2. Methods of Proof Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try.

2. METHODS OF PROOF 69 2. Methods of Proof 2.1. Types of Proofs. Suppose we wish to prove an implication p q. Here are some strategies we have available to try. Trivial Proof: If we know q is true then

### Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones

Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 9 (2002), No. 1, 301 307 Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones Walter Roth Department of Mathematics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam

### Elements of probability theory

2 Elements of probability theory Probability theory provides mathematical models for random phenomena, that is, phenomena which under repeated observations yield di erent outcomes that cannot be predicted

### Basic Measure Theory. 1.1 Classes of Sets

1 Basic Measure Theory In this chapter, we introduce the classes of sets that allow for a systematic treatment of events and random observations in the framework of probability theory. Furthermore, we

### The sample space for a pair of die rolls is the set. The sample space for a random number between 0 and 1 is the interval [0, 1].

Probability Theory Probability Spaces and Events Consider a random experiment with several possible outcomes. For example, we might roll a pair of dice, flip a coin three times, or choose a random real

### POWER SETS AND RELATIONS

POWER SETS AND RELATIONS L. MARIZZA A. BAILEY 1. The Power Set Now that we have defined sets as best we can, we can consider a sets of sets. If we were to assume nothing, except the existence of the empty

### CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

### Math 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces

Math 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces Dan Collins The textbook defines a subspace of a vector space in Chapter 4, but it avoids ever discussing the notion of a quotient space. This is understandable

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics

Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some

### Absolute continuity of measures and preservation of Randomness

Absolute continuity of measures and preservation of Randomness Mathieu Hoyrup 1 and Cristóbal Rojas 2 1 LORIA - 615, rue du jardin botanique, BP 239 54506 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, FRANCE, mathieu.hoyrup@loria.fr.

### Determinants, Areas and Volumes

Determinants, Areas and Volumes Theodore Voronov Part 2 Areas and Volumes The area of a two-dimensional object such as a region of the plane and the volume of a three-dimensional object such as a solid

### The Ideal Class Group

Chapter 5 The Ideal Class Group We will use Minkowski theory, which belongs to the general area of geometry of numbers, to gain insight into the ideal class group of a number field. We have already mentioned

### MINIMAL GENERATOR SETS FOR FINITELY GENERATED SHIFT-INVARIANT SUBSPACES OF L 2 (R n )

MINIMAL GENERATOR SETS FOR FINITELY GENERATED SHIFT-INVARIANT SUBSPACES OF L 2 (R n ) MARCIN BOWNIK AND NORBERT KAIBLINGER Abstract. Let S be a shift-invariant subspace of L 2 (R n ) defined by N generators

### Estimating the Average Value of a Function

Estimating the Average Value of a Function Problem: Determine the average value of the function f(x) over the interval [a, b]. Strategy: Choose sample points a = x 0 < x 1 < x 2 < < x n 1 < x n = b and

### THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE. Contents

THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE ALEX PONIECKI Abstract. This paper will study contractions of metric spaces. To do this, we will mainly use tools from topology. We will give some examples of contractions,

### 4.6 Null Space, Column Space, Row Space

NULL SPACE, COLUMN SPACE, ROW SPACE Null Space, Column Space, Row Space In applications of linear algebra, subspaces of R n typically arise in one of two situations: ) as the set of solutions of a linear

### 2 Complex Functions and the Cauchy-Riemann Equations

2 Complex Functions and the Cauchy-Riemann Equations 2.1 Complex functions In one-variable calculus, we study functions f(x) of a real variable x. Likewise, in complex analysis, we study functions f(z)

### An example of a computable

An example of a computable absolutely normal number Verónica Becher Santiago Figueira Abstract The first example of an absolutely normal number was given by Sierpinski in 96, twenty years before the concept

### Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning

Math 101 Rumbos Spring 2010 1 Handout #1: Mathematical Reasoning 1 Propositional Logic A proposition is a mathematical statement that it is either true or false; that is, a statement whose certainty or

### 6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 5: Existence of a Nash Equilibrium

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 5: Existence of a Nash Equilibrium Asu Ozdaglar MIT February 18, 2010 1 Introduction Outline Pricing-Congestion Game Example Existence of a Mixed

### Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned

CONSTRUCTION OF THE FINITE FIELDS Z p S. R. DOTY Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned solely with questions about the set of integers Z = {0, ±1,

### Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

### So let us begin our quest to find the holy grail of real analysis.

1 Section 5.2 The Complete Ordered Field: Purpose of Section We present an axiomatic description of the real numbers as a complete ordered field. The axioms which describe the arithmetic of the real numbers

### ON SEQUENTIAL CONTINUITY OF COMPOSITION MAPPING. 0. Introduction

ON SEQUENTIAL CONTINUITY OF COMPOSITION MAPPING Abstract. In [1] there was proved a theorem concerning the continuity of the composition mapping, and there was announced a theorem on sequential continuity

### Math 504, Fall 2013 HW 3

Math 504, Fall 013 HW 3 1. Let F = F (x) be the field of rational functions over the field of order. Show that the extension K = F(x 1/6 ) of F is equal to F( x, x 1/3 ). Show that F(x 1/3 ) is separable

### P (A) = lim P (A) = N(A)/N,

1.1 Probability, Relative Frequency and Classical Definition. Probability is the study of random or non-deterministic experiments. Suppose an experiment can be repeated any number of times, so that we

### INTEGRAL OPERATORS ON THE PRODUCT OF C(K) SPACES

INTEGRAL OPERATORS ON THE PRODUCT OF C(K) SPACES FERNANDO BOMBAL AND IGNACIO VILLANUEVA Abstract. We study and characterize the integral multilinear operators on a product of C(K) spaces in terms of the

### The Method of Lagrange Multipliers

The Method of Lagrange Multipliers S. Sawyer October 25, 2002 1. Lagrange s Theorem. Suppose that we want to maximize (or imize a function of n variables f(x = f(x 1, x 2,..., x n for x = (x 1, x 2,...,

### Chapter 3. Cartesian Products and Relations. 3.1 Cartesian Products

Chapter 3 Cartesian Products and Relations The material in this chapter is the first real encounter with abstraction. Relations are very general thing they are a special type of subset. After introducing

### 3. Equivalence Relations. Discussion

3. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS 33 3. Equivalence Relations 3.1. Definition of an Equivalence Relations. Definition 3.1.1. A relation R on a set A is an equivalence relation if and only if R is reflexive, symmetric,

### Transitivity and Topological Entropy on Fuzzy Dynamical Systems Through Fuzzy Observation

Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 9-2, 2007 70 Transitivity and Topological Entropy on Fuzzy Dynamical Systems Through Fuzzy

### IEOR 6711: Stochastic Models I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Tuesday, September 11 Normal Approximations and the Central Limit Theorem

IEOR 6711: Stochastic Models I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Tuesday, September 11 Normal Approximations and the Central Limit Theorem Time on my hands: Coin tosses. Problem Formulation: Suppose that I have

### 9 More on differentiation

Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 75 9 More on differentiation 9a Finite Taylor expansion............... 75 9b Continuous and nowhere differentiable..... 78 9c Differentiable and nowhere monotone......

### Linear Algebra. A vector space (over R) is an ordered quadruple. such that V is a set; 0 V ; and the following eight axioms hold:

Linear Algebra A vector space (over R) is an ordered quadruple (V, 0, α, µ) such that V is a set; 0 V ; and the following eight axioms hold: α : V V V and µ : R V V ; (i) α(α(u, v), w) = α(u, α(v, w)),

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence

### Linear Codes. In the V[n,q] setting, the terms word and vector are interchangeable.

Linear Codes Linear Codes In the V[n,q] setting, an important class of codes are the linear codes, these codes are the ones whose code words form a sub-vector space of V[n,q]. If the subspace of V[n,q]

### LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR THIS CHAPTER

CHAPTER 2 American mathematician Paul Halmos (1916 2006), who in 1942 published the first modern linear algebra book. The title of Halmos s book was the same as the title of this chapter. Finite-Dimensional

### Monotone maps of R n are quasiconformal

Monotone maps of R n are quasiconformal K. Astala, T. Iwaniec and G. Martin For Neil Trudinger Abstract We give a new and completely elementary proof showing that a δ monotone mapping of R n, n is K quasiconformal

### FIXED POINT ITERATION

FIXED POINT ITERATION We begin with a computational example. solving the two equations Consider E1: x =1+.5sinx E2: x =3+2sinx Graphs of these two equations are shown on accompanying graphs, with the solutions

### Math 231b Lecture 35. G. Quick

Math 231b Lecture 35 G. Quick 35. Lecture 35: Sphere bundles and the Adams conjecture 35.1. Sphere bundles. Let X be a connected finite cell complex. We saw that the J-homomorphism could be defined by

### Math 104: Introduction to Analysis

Math 104: Introduction to Analysis Evan Chen UC Berkeley Notes for the course MATH 104, instructed by Charles Pugh. 1 1 August 29, 2013 Hard: #22 in Chapter 1. Consider a pile of sand principle. You wish

### HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS. n!f n (1) lim. ln x n! + xn x. 1 = G n 1 (x). (2) k + 1 n. (n 1)!

Math 7 Fall 205 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS Problem. 2008 B2 Let F 0 x = ln x. For n 0 and x > 0, let F n+ x = 0 F ntdt. Evaluate n!f n lim n ln n. By directly computing F n x for small n s, we obtain the following

### FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS

FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS Robert F. Brown Department of Mathematics University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095 e-mail: rfb@math.ucla.edu Christina L. Soderlund Department of Mathematics

### God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886)

Chapter 2 Numbers God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886) God created the integers and the rest is the work

### Solutions to Math 51 First Exam January 29, 2015

Solutions to Math 5 First Exam January 29, 25. ( points) (a) Complete the following sentence: A set of vectors {v,..., v k } is defined to be linearly dependent if (2 points) there exist c,... c k R, not