# 1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set.

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set."

## Transcription

1 1. Prove that the empty set is a subset of every set. Basic Topology Written by Men-Gen Tsai Proof: For any element x of the empty set, x is also an element of every set since x does not exist. Hence, the empty set is a subset of every set. 2. A complex number z is said to be algebraic if there are integers a 0,..., a n, not all zero, such that a 0 z n + a 1 z n a n 1 z + a n = 0. Prove that the set of all algebraic numbers is countable. Hint: For every positive integer N there are only finitely many equations with n + a 0 + a a n = N. Proof: For every positive integer N there are only finitely many equations with n + a 0 + a a n = N. (since 1 n N and 0 a 0 N). We collect those equations as C N. Hence C N is countable. For each algebraic number, we can form an equation and this equation lies in C M for some M and thus the set of all algebraic numbers is countable. 3. Prove that there exist real numbers which are not algebraic. Proof: If not, R 1 = { all algebraic numbers } is countable, a contradiction. 1

2 4. Is the set of all irrational real numbers countable? Solution: If R Q is countable, then R 1 = (R Q) Q is countable, a contradiction. Thus R Q is uncountable. 5. Construct a bounded set of real numbers with exactly three limit points. Solution: Put A = {1/n : n N} {1 + 1/n : n N} {2 + 1/n : n N}. A is bounded by 3, and A contains three limit points - 0, 1, Let E be the set of all limit points of a set E. Prove that S is closed. Prove that E and E have the same limit points. (Recall that E = E E.) Do E and E always have the same limit points? Proof: For any point p of X E, that is, p is not a limit point E, there exists a neighborhood of p such that q is not in E with q p for every q in that neighborhood. Hence, p is an interior point of X E, that is, X E is open, that is, E is closed. Next, if p is a limit point of E, then p is also a limit point of E since E = E E. If p is a limit point of E, then every neighborhood N r (p) of p contains a point q p such that q E. If q E, we completed the proof. So we suppose that q E E = E E. Then q is a limit point of E. Hence, N r (q) where r = 1 min(r d(p, q), d(p, q)) is a neighborhood of q and contains 2 a point x q such that x E. Note that N r (q) contains in N r (p) {p}. That is, x p and x is in N r (p). Hence, q also a limit point of E. Hence, E and E have the same limit points. 2

3 Last, the answer of the final sub-problem is no. Put E = {1/n : n N}, and E = {0} and (E ) = φ. 7. Let A 1, A 2, A 3,... be subsets of a metric space. (a) If B n = n i=1 A i, prove that B n = n i=1 A i, for n = 1, 2, 3,... (b) If B = i=1, prove that B i=1 A i. Show, by an example, that this inclusion can be proper. Proof of (a): (Method 1) B n is the smallest closed subset of X that contains B n. Note that A i is a closed subset of X that contains B n, thus n B n A i. i=1 If p B n B n, then every neighborhood of p contained a point q p such that q B n. If p is not in A i for all i, then there exists some neighborhood N ri (p) of p such that (N ri (p) p) A i = φ for all i. Take r = min{r 1, r 2,..., r n }, and we have N r (p) B n = φ, a contradiction. Thus p A i for some i. Hence that is, n B n A i. i=1 n B n = A i. i=1 (Method 2) Since n i=1 A i is closed and B n = n i=1 A i n i=1 A i, B n n i=1 A i. Proof of (b): Since B is closed and B B A i, B A i for all i. Hence B A i. Note: My example is A i = (1/i, ) for all i. Thus, A i = [1/i, ), and B = (0, ), B = [0, ). Note that 0 is not in A i for all i. Thus this inclusion can be proper. 3

4 8. Is every point of every open set E R 2 a limit point of E? Answer the same question for closed sets in R 2. Solution: For the first part of this problem, the answer is yes. (Reason): For every point p of E, p is an interior point of E. That is, there is a neighborhood N r (p) of p such that N r (p) is a subset of E. Then for every real r, we can choose a point q such that d(p, q) = 1/2 min(r, r ). Note that q p, q N r (p), and q N r (p). Hence, every neighborhood N r (p) contains a point q p such that q N r (p) E, that is, p is a limit points of E. For the last part of this problem, the answer is no. Consider A = {(0, 0)}. A = φ and thus (0, 0) is not a limit point of E. 9. Let E o denote the set of all interior points of a set E. (a) Prove that E o is always open. (b) Prove that E is open if and only if E o = E. (c) If G is contained in E and G is open, prove that G is contained in E o. (d) Prove that the complement of E o is the closure of the complement of E. (e) Do E and E always have the same interiors? (f) Do E and E o always have the same closures? Proof of (a): If E is non-empty, take p E o. We need to show that p (E o ) o. Since p E o, there is a neighborhood N r of p such that N r is contained in E. For each q N r, note that N s (q) is contained in N r (p), where s = min{d(p, q), r d(p, q)}. Hence q is also an interior point of E, that is, N r is contained in E o. Hence E o is always open. Proof of (b): ( ) It is clear that E o is contained in E. Since E is open, every point of E is an interior point of E, that is, E is contained in E o. Therefore E o = E. 4

5 ( ) Since every point of E is an interior point of E (E o (E) = E), E is open. Proof of (c): If p G, p is an interior point of G since G is open. Note that E contains G, and thus p is also an interior point of E. Hence p E o. Therefore G is contained in E o. (Thus E o is the biggest open set contained in E. Similarly, E is the smallest closed set containing E.) Proof of (d): Suppose p X E o. If p X E, then p X E clearly. If p E, then N is not contained in E for any neighborhood N of p. Thus N contains an point q X E. Note that q p, that is, p is a limit point of X E. Hence X E o is contained in X E. Next, suppose p X E. If p X E, then p X E o clearly. If p E, then every neighborhood of p contains a point q p such that q X E. Hence p is not an interior point of E. Hence X E is contained in X E o. Therefore X E o = X E. Solution of (e): No. Take X = R 1 and E = Q. Thus E o = φ and E o = (R 1 ) o = R 1 φ. Solution of (f): No. Take X = R 1 and E = Q. Thus E = R 1, and E o = φ = φ. 10. Let X be an infinite set. For p X and q X, define 1 (if p q) d(p, q) = 0 (if p = q) Prove that this is a metric. Which subsets of the resulting metric space are open? Which are closed? Which are compact? Proof: (a) d(p, q) = 1 > 0 if p q; d(p, p) = 0. (b) d(p, q) = d(q, p) since p = q implies q = p and p q implies q p. (c) d(p, q) d(p, r) + d(r, q) for any r X if p = q. If p q, then either r = p or 5

6 r = q, that is, r p or r q. Thus, d(p, q) = 1 d(p, r) + d(r, q). By (a)-(c) we know that d is a metric. Every subset of X is open and closed. We claim that for any p X, p is not a limit point. Since d(p, q) = 1 > 1/2 if q p, there exists an neighborhood N 1/2 (p) of p contains no points of q p such that q X. Hence every subset of X contains no limit points and thus it is closed. Since X S is closed for every subset S of X, S = X (X S) is open. Hence every subset of X is open. Every finite subset of X is compact. Let S = {p 1,..., p n } be finite. Consider an open cover {G α } of S. Since S is covered by G α, p i is covered by G αi, thus {G α1,..., G αn } is finite subcover of S. Hence S is compact. Next, suppose S is infinite. Consider an open cover {G p } of S, where G p = N 1 (p) 2 for every p S. Note that q is not in G p if q p. If S is compact, then S can be covered by finite subcover, say G p1,..., G pn. Then there exists q such that q p i for all i since S is infinite, a contradiction. Hence only every finite subset of X is compact. 11. For x R 1 and y R 1, define d 1 (x, y) = (x, y) 2, d 2 (x, y) = x y, d 3 (x, y) = x 2 y 2, d 4 (x, y) = x 2y, d 5 (x, y) = x y 1 + x y. 6

7 Determine, for each of these, whether it is a metric or not. Solution: (1) d 1 (x, y) is not a metric. Since d 1 (0, 2) = 4, d 1 (0, 1) = 1, and d 1 (1, 2) = 1, d 1 (0, 2) > d 1 (0, 1) + d 1 (1, 2). Thus d 1 (x, y) is not a metric. (2) d 2 (x, y) is a metric. (a) d(p, q) > 0 if p q; d(p, p) = 0. (b) d(p, q) = p q = q p = d(q, p). (c) p q p r + r q, p q p r + r q p r + r q. That is, d(p, q) d(p, r) + d(r, q). (3) d 3 (x, y) is not a metric since d 3 (1, 1) = 0. (4) d 4 (x, y) is not a metric since d 4 (1, 1) = 1 0. (5) d 5 (x, y) is a metric since x y is a metric. Claim: d(x, y) is a metric, then is also a metric. d (x, y) = d(x, y) 1 + d(x, y) Proof of Claim: (a) d (p, q) > 0 if p q; d(p, p) = 0. (b) d (p, q) = d (q, p). (c) Let x = d(p, q), y = d(p, r), and z = d(r, q). Then x y+z. d (p, q) d (p, r) + d (r, q) x 1 + x y 1 + y + z 1 + z x(1 + y)(1 + z) y(1 + z)(1 + x) + z(1 + x)(1 + y) x + xy + xz + xyz (y + xy + yz + xyz) + (z + xz + yz + xyz) x y + z + 2yz + xyz x y + z Thus, d is also a metric. 12. Let K R 1 consist of 0 and the numbers 1/n, for n = 1, 2, 3,... Prove that K is compact directly from the definition (without using the Heine-Borel theorem). 7

8 Proof: Suppose that {O α } is an arbitrary open covering of K. Let E {O α } consists 0. Since E is open and 0 E, 0 is an interior point of E. Thus there is a neighborhood N = N r (0) of 0 such that N E. Thus N contains 1 [1/r] + 1, 1 [1/r] + 2,... Next, we take finitely many open sets E n {O α } such that 1/n E n for n = 1, 2,..., [1/r]. Hence {E, E 1,..., E [1/r] is a finite subcover of K. Therefore, K is compact. Note: The unique limit point of K is 0. Suppose p 0 is a limit point of K. Clearly, 0 < p < 1. (p cannot be 1). Thus there exists n Z + such that 1 n + 1 < p < 1 n. Hence N r (p) where r = min{ 1 p, p 1 } contains no points of K, n n+1 a contradiction. 13. Construct a compact set of real numbers whose limit points form a countable set. Solution: Let K be consist of 0 and the numbers 1/n for n = 1, 2, 3,... Let xk = {xk : k K} and x + K = {x + k : k K} for x R 1. I take S n = (1 1 2 ) + K n 2, n+1 S = S n {1}. n=1 Claim: S is compact and the set of all limit points of S is K {1}. Clearly, S lies in [0, 1], that is, S is bounded in R 1. Note that S n [1 1 2 n, n+1 ]. By Exercise 12 and its note, I have that all limit points of S [0, 1) is 0, 1 2,..., 1 2 n,... 8

9 Clearly, 1 is also a limit point of S. Therefore, the set of all limit points of S is K {1}. Note that K {1} S, that is, K is compact. I completed the proof of my claim. 14. Give an example of an open cover of the segment (0, 1) which has no finite subcover. Solution: Take {O n } = {(1/n, 1)} for n = 1, 2, 3,... The following is my proof. For every x (0, 1), 1 x ( [1/x] + 1, 0) {O n} Hence {O n } is an open covering of (0, 1). Suppose there exists a finite subcovering ( 1, 1),..., ( 1, 1) n 1 n k where n 1 < n 2 <... < n k, respectively. Clearly 1 2n p any elements of that subcover, a contradiction. (0, 1) is not in Note: By the above we know that (0, 1) is not compact. 15. Show that Theorem 2.36 and its Corollary become false (in R 1, for example) if the word compact is replaced by closed or by bounded. Theorem 2.36: If {K α } is a collection of compact subsets of a metric space X such that the intersection of every finite subcollection of {K α } is nonempty, then K α is nonempty. Corollary: If {K n } is a sequence of nonempty compact sets such that K n contains K n+1 (n = 1, 2, 3,...), then K n is not empty. Solution: For closed: [n, ). For bounded: ( 1/n, 1/n) {0}. 9

10 16. Regard Q, the set of all rational numbers, as a metric space, with d(p, q) = p q. Let E be the set of all p Q such that 2 < p 2 < 3. Show that E is closed and bounded in Q, but that E is not compact. Is E open in Q? Proof: Let S = ( 2, 3) ( 3, 2). Then E = {p Q : p S}. Clearly, E is bounded in Q. Since Q is dense in R, every limit point of Q is in Q. (I regard Q as a metric space). Hence, E is closed in Q. To prove that E is not compact, we form a open covering of E as follows: {G α } = {N r (p) : p E and (p r, p + r) S} Surely, {G α } is a open covering of E. If E is compact, then there are finitely many indices α 1,..., α n such that E G α1... Gαn. For every G αi = N ri (p i ), take p = max 1 i n p i. Thus, p is the nearest point to 3. But N r (p) lies in E, thus [p + r, 3) cannot be covered since Q is dense in R, a contradiction. Hence E is not compact. Finally, the answer is yes. Take any p Q, then there exists a neighborhood N(p) of p contained in E. (Take r small enough where N r (p) = N(p), and Q is dense in R.) Thus every point in N(p) is also in Q. Hence E is also open. 17. Let E be the set of all x [0, 1] whose decimal expansion contains only the digits 4 and 7. Is E countable? Is E dense in [0, 1]? Is E compact? Is E perfect? Solution: E = { n=1 a n 10 : a n n = 4 or a n = 7 } 10

11 Claim: E is uncountable. Proof of Claim: If not, we list E as follows: x 1 = 0.a 11 a 12...a 1n... x 2 = 0.a 21 a 22...a 2n x k = 0.a k1 a k2...a kn (Prevent ending with all digits 9) Let x = 0.x 1 x 2...x n... where 4 if a nn = 7 x n = 7 if a nn = 4 By my construction, x / E, a contradiction. Thus E is uncountable. Claim: E is not dense in [0, 1]. Proof of Claim: Note that E (0.47, 0.74) = φ. Hence E is not dense in [0, 1]. Claim: E is compact. Proof of Claim: Clearly, E is bounded. For every limit point p of E, I show that p E. If not, write the decimal expansion of p as follows p = 0.p 1 p 2...p n... Since p / E, there exists the smallest k such that p k 4 and p k 7. When p k = 0, 1, 2, 3, select the smallest l such that p l = 7 if possible. (If l does not exist, then p < 0.4. Thus there is a neighborhood of p such that contains no points of E, a contradiction.) Thus 0.p 1...p l 1 4p l+1...p k 1 7 < p < 0.p 1...p k 1 4. Thus there is a neighborhood of p such that contains no points of E, a contradiction. 11

12 When p k = 5, 6, 0.p 1...p k 1 47 < p < 0.p 1...p k Thus there is a neighborhood of p such that contains no points of E, a contradiction. When p k = 8, 9, it is similar. Hence E is closed. Therefore E is compact. Claim: E is perfect. Proof of Claim: Take any p E, and I claim that p is a limit point of E. Write p = 0.p 1 p 2...p n... Let x k = 0.y 1 y 2...y n... where y n = p k if k n 4 if p n = 7 7 if p n = 4 Thus, x k p 0 as k. Also, x k p for all k. Hence p is a limit point of E. Therefore E is perfect. 18. Is there a nonempty perfect set in R 1 which contains no rational number? Solution: Yes. The following claim will show the reason. Claim: Given a measure zero set S, we have a perfect set P contains no elements in S. Proof of Claim: (due to SYLee). Since S has measure zero, there exists a collection of open intervals {I n } such that S I n and I n < 1. 12

13 Consider E = R 1 I n. E is nonempty since E has positive measure. Thus E is uncountable and E is closed. Therefore there exists a nonempty perfect set P contained in E by Exercise 28. P S = φ. Thus P is our required perfect set. 19. (a) If A and B are disjoint closed sets in some metric space X, prove that they are separated. (b) Prove the same for disjoint open sets. (c) Fix p X, δ > 0, define A to be the set of all q X for which d(p, q) < δ, define B similarly, with > in place of <. Prove that A and B are separated. (d) Prove that every connected metric space with at least two points is uncountable. Hint: Use (c). Proof of (a): Recall the definition of separated: A and B are separated if A B and A B are empty. Since A and B are closed sets, A = A and B = B. Hence A B = A B = A B = φ. Hence A and B are separated. Proof of (b): Suppose A B is not empty. Thus there exists p such that p A and p B. For p A, there exists a neighborhood N r (p) of p contained in A since A is open. For p B = B B, if p B, then p A B. Note that A and B are disjoint, and it s a contradiction. If p B, then p is a limit point of B. Thus every neighborhood of p contains a point q p such that q B. Take an neighborhood N r (p)of p containing a point q p such that q B. Note that N r (p) A, thus q A. With A and B are disjoint, we get a contradiction. Hence A (B) is empty. Similarly, A B is also empty. Thus A and B are separated. Proof of (c): Suppose A B is not empty. Thus there exists x such 13

14 that x A and x B. Since x A, d(p, x) < δ. x B = B B, thus if x B, then d(p, x) > δ, a contradiction. The only possible is x is a limit point of B. Hence we take a neighborhood N r (x) of x contains y with y B where r = δ d(x,p) 2. Clearly, d(y, p) > δ. But, d(y, p) d(y, x) + d(x, p) < r + d(x, p) δ d(x, p) = + d(x, p) 2 δ + d(x, p) = 2 < δ + δ = δ. 2 A contradiction. Hence A B is empty. Similarly, A B is also empty. Thus A and B are separated. Note: Take care of δ > 0. Think a while and you can prove the next sub-exercise. Proof of (d): Let X be a connected metric space. Take p X, q X with p q, thus d(p, q) > 0 is fixed. Let A = {x X : d(x, p) < δ}; B = {x X : d(x, p) > δ}. Take δ = δ t = td(p, q) where t (0, 1). Thus 0 < δ < d(p, q). p A since d(p, p) = 0 < δ, and q B since d(p, q) > δ. Thus A and B are non-empty. By (c), A and B are separated. If X = A B, then X is not connected, a contradiction. Thus there exists y t X such that y / A B. Let E = E t = {x X : d(x, p) = δ t } y t. For any real t (0, 1), E t is non-empty. Next, E t and E s are disjoint if t s (since a metric is well-defined). Thus X contains a uncount- 14

15 able set {y t : t (0, 1)} since (0, 1) is uncountable. Therefore, X is uncountable. Note: It is a good exercise. If that metric space contains only one point, then it must be separated. Similar Exercise Given by SYLee: (a) Let A = {x : d(p, x) < r} and B = {x : d(p, x) > r} for some p in a metric space X. Show that A, B are separated. (b) Show that a connected metric space with at least two points must be uncountable. [Hint: Use (a)] Proof of (a): By definition of separated sets, we want to show A B = φ, and B A = φ. In order to do these, it is sufficient to show A B = φ. Let x A B = φ, then we have: (1) x A d(x, p) r(2) x B d(x, p) > r It is impossible. So, A B = φ. Proof of (b): Suppose that C is countable, say C = a, b, x 3,... We want to show C is disconnected. So, if C is a connected metric space with at least two points, it must be uncountable. Consider the set S = {d(a, x i ) : x i C}, and thus let r R S and inf S < r < sup S. And construct A and B as in (a), we have C = A B, where A and B are separated. That is C is disconnected. Another Proof of (b): Let a C, b C, consider the continuous function f from C into R defined by f(x) = d(x, a). So, f(c) is connected and f(a) = 0, f(b) > 0. That is, f(c) is an interval. Therefore, C is uncountable. 20. Are closures and interiors of connected sets always connected? (Look at subsets of R 2.) 15

16 Solution: Closures of connected sets is always connected, but interiors of those is not. The counterexample is S = N 1 (2, 0) N 1 ( 2, 0) {x axis} R 2. Since S is path-connected, S is connect. But S o = N 1 (2) N 1 ( 2) is disconnected clearly. Claim: If S is a connected subset of a metric space, then S is connected. Pf of Claim: If not, then S is a union of two nonempty separated set A and B. Thus A B = A B = φ. Note that S = S T = A B T = (A B) T c = (A T c ) (B T c ) where T = S S. Thus (A T c ) B T c (A T c ) B T c A B = φ. Hence (A T c ) B T c = φ. Similarly, A T c (B T c ) = φ. Now we claim that both A T c and B T c are nonempty. Suppose that B T c = φ. Thus A T c = S A (S S) c = S A (A B S) c = S A ((A B) S c ) c = S 16

17 A ((A c B c ) S) = S (A S) (A A c B c ) = S A S = S. Thus B is empty, a contradiction. Thus B T c is nonempty. Similarly, A T c nonempty. Therefore S is a union of two nonempty separated sets, a contradiction. Hence S is connected. 21. Let A and B be separated subsets of some R k, suppose a A, b B, and define p(t) = (1 t)a + tb for t R 1. Put A 0 = p 1 (A), B 0 = p 1 (B). [Thus t A 0 if and only if p(t) A.] (a) Prove that A 0 and B 0 are separated subsets of R 1. (b) Prove that there exists t 0 (0, 1) such that p(t 0 ) / A B. (c) Prove that every convex subset of R k is connected. Proof of (a): I claim that A 0 B0 is empty. (B 0 A0 is similar). If not, take x A 0 B0. x A 0 and x B 0. x B 0 or x is a limit point of B 0. x B 0 will make x A 0 B0, that is, p(x) A B, a contradiction since A and B are separated. Claim: x is a limit point of B 0 p(x) is a limit point of B. Take any neighborhood N r of p(x), and p(t) lies in B for small enough t. More precisely, x r b a < t < x + r b a. Since x is a limit point of B 0, and (x r/ b a, x + r/ b a ) is a neighborhood N of x, thus N contains a point y x such that y B 0, that is, p(y) B. Also, p(y) N r. Therefore, p(x) is a limit point of B. Hence p(x) A B, a contradiction since A and B are separated. 17

18 Hence A 0 B0 is empty, that is, A 0 and B 0 are separated subsets of R 1. Proof of (b): Suppose not. For every t 0 (0, 1), neither p(t 0 ) A nor p(t 0 ) B (since A and B are separated). Also, p(t 0 ) A B for all t 0 (0, 1). Hence (0, 1) = A 0 B0, a contradiction since (0, 1) is connected. I completed the proof. Proof of (c): Let S be a convex subset of R k. If S is not connected, then S is a union of two nonempty separated sets A and B. By (b), there exists t 0 (0, 1) such that p(t 0 ) / A B. But S is convex, p(t 0 ) must lie in A B, a contradiction. Hence S is connected. 22. A metric space is called separable if it contains a countable dense subset. Show that R k is separable. Hint: Consider the set of points which have only rational coordinates. Proof: Consider S = the set of points which have only rational coordinates. For any point x = (x 1, x 2,..., x k ) R k, we can find a rational sequence {r ij } x j for j = 1,..., k since Q is dense in R 1. Thus, r i = (r i1, r i2,..., r ik ) x and r i S for all i. Hence S is dense in R k. Also, S is countable, that is, S is a countable dense subset in R k, R k is separable. 23. A collection {V α } of open subsets of X is said to be a base for X if the following is true: For every x X and every open set G X such that x G, we have x V α G for some α. In other words, every open set in X is the union of a subcollection of {V α }. Prove that every separable metric space has a countable base. Hint: Take all neighborhoods with rational radius and center in some countable dense subset of X. 18

19 Proof: Let X be a separable metric space, and S be a countable dense subset of X. Let a collection {V α } = { all neighborhoods with rational radius and center in S }. We claim that {V α } is a base for X. For every x X and every open set G X such that x G, there exists a neighborhood N r (p) of p such that N r (p) G since x is an interior point of G. Since S is dense in X, there exists {s n } x. Take a rational number r n such that r n < r, and {V 2 α} N rn (s n ) N r (p) for enough large n. Hence we have x V α G for some α. Hence {V α } is a base for X. 24. Let X be a metric space in which every infinite subset has a limit point. Prove that X is separable. Hint: Fix δ > 0, and pick x 1 X. Having chosen x 1,..., x j X, choose x j+1, if possible, so that d(x i, x j+1 ) δ for i = 1,..., j. Show that this process must stop after finite number of steps, and that X can therefore be covered by finite many neighborhoods of radius δ. Take δ = 1/n(n = 1, 2, 3,...), and consider the centers of the corresponding neighborhoods. Proof: Fix δ > 0, and pick x 1 X. Having chosen x 1,..., x j X, choose x j+1, if possible, so that d(x i, x j+1 ) δ for i = 1,..., j. If this process cannot stop, then consider the set A = {x 1, x 2,..., x k }. If p is a limit point of A, then a neighborhood N δ/3 (p) of p contains a point q p such that q A. q = x k for only one k N. If not, d(x i, x j ) d(x i, p) + d(x j, p) δ/3 + δ/3 < δ, and it contradicts the fact that d(x i, x j ) δ for i j. Hence, this process must stop after finite number of steps. Suppose this process stop after k steps, and X is covered by N δ (x 1 ), N δ (x 2 ),..., N δ (x k ), that is, X can therefore be covered by finite many neighborhoods of radius δ. Take δ = 1/n(n = 1, 2, 3,...), and consider the set A of the centers of 19

20 the corresponding neighborhoods. Fix p X. Suppose that p is not in A, and every neighborhood N r (p). Note that N r/2 (p) can be covered by finite many neighborhoods N s (x 1 ),..., N s (x k ) of radius s = 1/n where n = [2/r] + 1 and x i A for i = 1,..., k. Hence, d(x 1, p) d(x 1, q) + d(q, p) r/2 + s < r where q N r/2 (p) N s (x 1 ). Therefore, x 1 N r (p) and x 1 p since p is not in A. Hence, p is a limit point of A if p is not in A, that is, A is a countable dense subset, that is, X is separable. 25. Prove that every compact metric space K has a countable base, and that K is therefore separable. Hint: For every positive integer n, there are finitely many neighborhood of radius 1/n whose union covers K. Proof: For every positive integer n, there are finitely many neighborhood of radius 1/n whose union covers K (since K is compact). Collect all of them, say {V α }, and it forms a countable collection. We claim {V α } is a base. For every x X and every open set G X, there exists N r (x) such that N r (x) G since x is an interior point of G. Hence x N m (p) {V α } for some p where m = [2/r] + 1. For every y N m (p), we have d(y, x) d(y, p) + d(p, x) < m + m = 2m < r. Hence N m (p) G, that is, V α G for some α, and therefore {V α } is a countable base of K. Next, collect all of the center of V α, say D, and we claim D is dense in K (D is countable since V α is countable). For all p K and any ɛ > 0 we can find N n (x n ) {V α } where n = [1/ɛ] + 1. Note that x n D for all n and d(p, x n ) 0 as n. Hence D is dense in K. 20

21 26. Let X be a metric space in which every infinite subsets has a limit point. Prove that X is compact. Hint: By Exercises 23 and 24, X has a countable base. It follows that every open cover of X has a countable subcover {G n }, n = 1, 2, 3,... If no finite subcollection of {G n } covers X, then the complement F n of G 1... Gn is nonempty for each n, but F n is empty. If E is a set contains a point from each F n, consider a limit point of E, and obtain a contradiction. Proof: By Exercises 23 and 24, X has a countable base. It follows that every open cover of X has a countable subcover {G n }, n = 1, 2, 3,... If no finite subcollection of {G n } covers X, then the complement F n of G 1... Gn is nonempty for each n, but F n is empty. If E is a set contains a point from each F n, consider a limit point of E. Note that F k F k+1... and F n is closed for all n, thus p lies in F k for all k. Hence p lies in F n, but F n is empty, a contradiction. 27. Define a point p in a metric space X to be a condensation point of a set E X if every neighborhood of p contains uncountably many points of E. Suppose E R k, E is uncountable, and let P be the set of all condensation points of E. Prove that P is perfect and that at most countably many points of E are not in P. In other words, show that P c E is at most countable. Hint: Let {V n } be a countable base of R k, let W be the union of those V n for which E V n is at most countable, and show that P = W c. Proof: Let {V n } be a countable base of R k, let W be the union of those V n for which E V n is at most countable, and we will show that P = W c. Suppose x P. (x is a condensation point of E). If x V n for some n, then E V n is uncountable since V n is open. Thus x W c. (If x W, then there exists V n such that x V n and E V n 21

22 is uncountable, a contradiction). Therefore P W c. Conversely, suppose x W c. x / V n for any n such that E V n is countable. Take any neighborhood N(x) of x. Take x V n N(x), and E V n is uncountable. Thus E N(x) is also uncountable, x is a condensation point of E. Thus W c P. Therefore P = W c. Note that W is countable, and thus W W E = P c E is at most countable. To show that P is perfect, it is enough to show that P contains no isolated point. (since P is closed). If p is an isolated point of P, then there exists a neighborhood N of p such that N E = φ. p is not a condensation point of E, a contradiction. Therefore P is perfect. 28. Prove that every closed set in a separable metric space is the union of a (possible empty) perfect set and a set which is at most countable. (Corollary: Every countable closed set in R k has isolated points.) Hint: Use Exercise 27. Proof: Let X be a separable metric space, let E be a closed set on X. Suppose E is uncountable. (If E is countable, there is nothing to prove.) Let P be the set of all condensation points of E. Since X has a countable base, P is perfect, and P c E is at most countable by Exercise 27. Since E is closed, P E. Also, P c E = E P. Hence E = P (E P ). For corollary: if there is no isolated point in E, then E is perfect. Thus E is uncountable, a contradiction. Note: It s also called Cauchy-Bendixon Theorem. 29. Prove that every open set in R 1 is the union of an at most countable collection of disjoint segments. Hint: Use Exercise

23 Proof: (due to H.L.Royden, Real Analysis) Since O is open, for each x in O, there is a y > x such that (x, y) O. Let b = sup{y : (x, y) O}. Let a = inf{z : (z, x) O}. Then a < x < b, and I x = (a, b) is an open interval containing x. Now I x O, for if w I x, say x < w < b, we have by the definition of b a number y > w such that (x, y) O, and so w O). Moreover, b / O, for if b O, then for some ɛ > 0 we have (b ɛ, b+ɛ) O, whence (x, b + ɛ) O, contradicting the definition of b. Similarly, a / O. Consider the collection of open intervals {I x }, x O. Since each x O is contained in I x, and each I x O, we have O = I x. Let (a, b) and (c, d) be two intervals in this collection with a point in common. Then we must have c < b and a < d. Since c / O, it does not belong to (a, b) and we have c a. Since a / O and hence not to (c, d), we have a c. Thus a = c. Similarly, b = d, and (a, b) = (c, d). Thus two different intervals in the collection {I x } must be disjoint. Thus O is the union of the disjoint collection {I x } of open intervals, and it remains only to show that this collection is countable. But each open interval contains a rational number since Q is dense in R. Since we have a collection of disjoint open intervals, each open interval contains a different rational number, and the collection can be put in one-to-one correspondence with a subset of the rationals. Thus it is a countable collection. 30. Imitate the proof of Theorem 2.43 to obtain the following result: If R k = 1 F n, where each F n is a closed subset of R k, then at least one F n has a nonempty interior. Equivalent statement: If G n is a dense open subset of R k, for 23

24 n = 1, 2, 3,..., then 1 in R k ). G n is not empty (in fact, it is dense (This is a special case of Baire s theorem; see Exercise 22, Chap. 3, for the general case.) Proof: I prove Baire s theorem directly. Let G n be a dense open subset of R k for n = 1, 2, 3,... I need to prove that 1 any nonempty open subset of R k is not empty. G n intersects Let G 0 is a nonempty open subset of R k. Since G 1 is dense and G 0 is nonempty, G 0 G1 φ. Suppose x 1 G 0 G1. Since G 0 and G 1 are open, G 0 G1 is also open, that is, there exist a neighborhood V 1 such that V 1 G 0 G1. Next, since G 2 is a dense open set and V 1 is a nonempty open set, V 1 G2 φ. Thus, I can find a nonempty open set V 2 such that V 2 V 1 G2. Suppose I have get n nonempty open sets V 1, V 2,..., V n such that V 1 G 0 G1 and V i+1 V i Gn+1 for all i = 1, 2,..., n 1. Since G n+1 is a dense open set and V n is a nonempty open set, V n Gn+1 is a nonempty open set. Thus I can find a nonempty open set V n+1 such that V n+1 V n Gn+1. By induction, I can form a sequence of open sets {V n : n Z + } such that V 1 G 0 G1 and V i+1 V i Gi+1 for all n Z +. Since V 1 is bounded and V 1 V 2... V n..., by Theorem 2.39 I know that V n φ. n=1 Since V 1 G 0 G1 and V n+1 G n+1, G 0 ( n=1 G n ) φ. Proved. Note: By Baire s theorem, I ve proved the equivalent statement. Next, F n has a empty interior if and only if G n = R k F n is dense in R k. Hence we completed all proof. 24

### Chap2: The Real Number System (See Royden pp40)

Chap2: The Real Number System (See Royden pp40) 1 Open and Closed Sets of Real Numbers The simplest sets of real numbers are the intervals. We define the open interval (a, b) to be the set (a, b) = {x

### PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS

PART I. THE REAL NUMBERS This material assumes that you are already familiar with the real number system and the representation of the real numbers as points on the real line. I.1. THE NATURAL NUMBERS

### Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009)

1 Distance J Muscat 1 Metric Spaces Joseph Muscat 2003 (Last revised May 2009) (A revised and expanded version of these notes are now published by Springer.) 1 Distance A metric space can be thought of

### SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3 Fall 2008 III. Spaces with special properties III.1 : Compact spaces I Problems from Munkres, 26, pp. 170 172 3. Show that a finite union of compact subspaces

### Structure of Measurable Sets

Structure of Measurable Sets In these notes we discuss the structure of Lebesgue measurable subsets of R from several different points of view. Along the way, we will see several alternative characterizations

### Math 317 HW #7 Solutions

Math 17 HW #7 Solutions 1. Exercise..5. Decide which of the following sets are compact. For those that are not compact, show how Definition..1 breaks down. In other words, give an example of a sequence

### Ri and. i=1. S i N. and. R R i

The subset R of R n is a closed rectangle if there are n non-empty closed intervals {[a 1, b 1 ], [a 2, b 2 ],..., [a n, b n ]} so that R = [a 1, b 1 ] [a 2, b 2 ] [a n, b n ]. The subset R of R n is an

### REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2

REAL ANALYSIS I HOMEWORK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN The questions are from Stein and Shakarchi s text, Chapter 1. 1. Prove that the Cantor set C constructed in the text is totally disconnected and perfect. In other

### Notes on metric spaces

Notes on metric spaces 1 Introduction The purpose of these notes is to quickly review some of the basic concepts from Real Analysis, Metric Spaces and some related results that will be used in this course.

### Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces

Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1988 2008 Contents 1 Topological Spaces 1 1.1 Continuity and Topological Spaces...............

### Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................

### 6. Metric spaces. In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. d : X X [0, )

6. Metric spaces In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. Definitions. A metric on a non-empty set X is a map with the following properties: d : X X [0, ) (i) If x, y X are points

### Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the axioms and any previously proven theorems.

Math 232 - Discrete Math 2.1 Direct Proofs and Counterexamples Notes Axiom: Proposition that is assumed to be true. Proof: A logical argument establishing the truth of the theorem given the truth of the

### Chapter 1. Metric Spaces. Metric Spaces. Examples. Normed linear spaces

Chapter 1. Metric Spaces Metric Spaces MA222 David Preiss d.preiss@warwick.ac.uk Warwick University, Spring 2008/2009 Definitions. A metric on a set M is a function d : M M R such that for all x, y, z

### Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011

Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely

### 1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1

Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or

### SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576

SOLUTIONS TO ASSIGNMENT 1 MATH 576 SOLUTIONS BY OLIVIER MARTIN 13 #5. Let T be the topology generated by A on X. We want to show T = J B J where B is the set of all topologies J on X with A J. This amounts

### CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE

CARDINALITY, COUNTABLE AND UNCOUNTABLE SETS PART ONE With the notion of bijection at hand, it is easy to formalize the idea that two finite sets have the same number of elements: we just need to verify

### Math 104: Introduction to Analysis

Math 104: Introduction to Analysis Evan Chen UC Berkeley Notes for the course MATH 104, instructed by Charles Pugh. 1 1 August 29, 2013 Hard: #22 in Chapter 1. Consider a pile of sand principle. You wish

### Course 221: Analysis Academic year , First Semester

Course 221: Analysis Academic year 2007-08, First Semester David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1989 2007 Contents 1 Basic Theorems of Real Analysis 1 1.1 The Least Upper Bound Principle................

### MAT2400 Analysis I. A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions

MAT2400 Analysis I A brief introduction to proofs, sets, and functions In Analysis I there is a lot of manipulations with sets and functions. It is probably also the first course where you have to take

### THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE. Contents

THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE ALEX PONIECKI Abstract. This paper will study contractions of metric spaces. To do this, we will mainly use tools from topology. We will give some examples of contractions,

### {f 1 (U), U F} is an open cover of A. Since A is compact there is a finite subcover of A, {f 1 (U 1 ),...,f 1 (U n )}, {U 1,...

44 CHAPTER 4. CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS In Calculus we often use arithmetic operations to generate new continuous functions from old ones. In a general metric space we don t have arithmetic, but much of it

### Finite Sets. Theorem 5.1. Two non-empty finite sets have the same cardinality if and only if they are equivalent.

MATH 337 Cardinality Dr. Neal, WKU We now shall prove that the rational numbers are a countable set while R is uncountable. This result shows that there are two different magnitudes of infinity. But we

### Point Set Topology. A. Topological Spaces and Continuous Maps

Point Set Topology A. Topological Spaces and Continuous Maps Definition 1.1 A topology on a set X is a collection T of subsets of X satisfying the following axioms: T 1.,X T. T2. {O α α I} T = α IO α T.

### REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE

REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: 1.4 OUTER MEASURE CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1.4.1 Introduction We will expand on Section 1.4 of Folland s text, which covers abstract outer measures also called exterior measures).

### Math 507/420 Homework Assignment #1: Due in class on Friday, September 20. SOLUTIONS

Math 507/420 Homework Assignment #1: Due in class on Friday, September 20. SOLUTIONS 1. Show that a nonempty collection A of subsets is an algebra iff 1) for all A, B A, A B A and 2) for all A A, A c A.

### Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces

APPENDIX A Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces We present here the basic theory of Polish spaces and standard Borel spaces. Standard references for this material are the books [143, 231]. A.1. Polish

### Math Real Analysis I

Math 431 - Real Analysis I Solutions to Homework due October 1 In class, we learned of the concept of an open cover of a set S R n as a collection F of open sets such that S A. A F We used this concept

### 9 More on differentiation

Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 75 9 More on differentiation 9a Finite Taylor expansion............... 75 9b Continuous and nowhere differentiable..... 78 9c Differentiable and nowhere monotone......

### Limits and convergence.

Chapter 2 Limits and convergence. 2.1 Limit points of a set of real numbers 2.1.1 Limit points of a set. DEFINITION: A point x R is a limit point of a set E R if for all ε > 0 the set (x ε,x + ε) E is

### BOREL SETS, WELL-ORDERINGS OF R AND THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS. Proof. We shall define inductively a decreasing sequence of infinite subsets of N

BOREL SETS, WELL-ORDERINGS OF R AND THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS SIMON THOMAS 1. The Finite Basis Problem Definition 1.1. Let C be a class of structures. Then a basis for C is a collection B C such that for

### Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics

Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights

### No: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics

No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results

### Prof. Girardi, Math 703, Fall 2012 Homework Solutions: Homework 13. in X is Cauchy.

Homework 13 Let (X, d) and (Y, ρ) be metric spaces. Consider a function f : X Y. 13.1. Prove or give a counterexample. f preserves convergent sequences if {x n } n=1 is a convergent sequence in X then

### Compactness in metric spaces

MATHEMATICS 3103 (Functional Analysis) YEAR 2012 2013, TERM 2 HANDOUT #2: COMPACTNESS OF METRIC SPACES Compactness in metric spaces The closed intervals [a, b] of the real line, and more generally the

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics

Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some

### x = (x 1,..., x d ), y = (y 1,..., y d ) x + y = (x 1 + y 1,..., x d + y d ), x = (x 1,..., x d ), t R tx = (tx 1,..., tx d ).

1. Lebesgue Measure 2. Outer Measure 3. Radon Measures on R 4. Measurable Functions 5. Integration 6. Coin-Tossing Measure 7. Product Measures 8. Change of Coordinates 1. Lebesgue Measure Throughout R

### x a x 2 (1 + x 2 ) n.

Limits and continuity Suppose that we have a function f : R R. Let a R. We say that f(x) tends to the limit l as x tends to a; lim f(x) = l ; x a if, given any real number ɛ > 0, there exists a real number

### Practice with Proofs

Practice with Proofs October 6, 2014 Recall the following Definition 0.1. A function f is increasing if for every x, y in the domain of f, x < y = f(x) < f(y) 1. Prove that h(x) = x 3 is increasing, using

### I. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES

I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called

### This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics.

Appendix A Set Theory This chapter describes set theory, a mathematical theory that underlies all of modern mathematics. A.1 Basic Definitions Definition A.1.1. A set is an unordered collection of elements.

### Chapter 1. Sigma-Algebras. 1.1 Definition

Chapter 1 Sigma-Algebras 1.1 Definition Consider a set X. A σ algebra F of subsets of X is a collection F of subsets of X satisfying the following conditions: (a) F (b) if B F then its complement B c is

### NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY. M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete. Autumn of 2004

NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Autumn of 2004 2 Contents 1 σ-algebras 7 1.1 σ-algebras............................... 7 1.2 Generated σ-algebras.........................

### Sets and Cardinality Notes for C. F. Miller

Sets and Cardinality Notes for 620-111 C. F. Miller Semester 1, 2000 Abstract These lecture notes were compiled in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics in the University of Melbourne for the use

### Exercise 1. Let E be a given set. Prove that the following statements are equivalent.

Real Variables, Fall 2014 Problem set 1 Solution suggestions Exercise 1. Let E be a given set. Prove that the following statements are equivalent. (i) E is measurable. (ii) Given ε > 0, there exists an

### Problem Set. Problem Set #2. Math 5322, Fall December 3, 2001 ANSWERS

Problem Set Problem Set #2 Math 5322, Fall 2001 December 3, 2001 ANSWERS i Problem 1. [Problem 18, page 32] Let A P(X) be an algebra, A σ the collection of countable unions of sets in A, and A σδ the collection

### CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.

CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,

### God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886)

Chapter 2 Numbers God created the integers and the rest is the work of man. (Leopold Kronecker, in an after-dinner speech at a conference, Berlin, 1886) God created the integers and the rest is the work

### Infinite product spaces

Chapter 7 Infinite product spaces So far we have talked a lot about infinite sequences of independent random variables but we have never shown how to construct such sequences within the framework of probability/measure

### S(A) X α for all α Λ. Consequently, S(A) X, by the definition of intersection. Therefore, X is inductive.

MA 274: Exam 2 Study Guide (1) Know the precise definitions of the terms requested for your journal. (2) Review proofs by induction. (3) Be able to prove that something is or isn t an equivalence relation.

### Topology and Convergence by: Daniel Glasscock, May 2012

Topology and Convergence by: Daniel Glasscock, May 2012 These notes grew out of a talk I gave at The Ohio State University. The primary reference is [1]. A possible error in the proof of Theorem 1 in [1]

### Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure.

Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure. October 19, 2010 Today s lecture will be devoted to Lebesgue measure, a creation of Henri Lebesgue, in his thesis, one of the most famous theses in the history of mathematics.

### Weak topologies. David Lecomte. May 23, 2006

Weak topologies David Lecomte May 3, 006 1 Preliminaries from general topology In this section, we are given a set X, a collection of topological spaces (Y i ) i I and a collection of maps (f i ) i I such

### Convergent Sequence. Definition A sequence {p n } in a metric space (X, d) is said to converge if there is a point p X with the following property:

Convergent Sequence Definition A sequence {p n } in a metric space (X, d) is said to converge if there is a point p X with the following property: ( ɛ > 0)( N)( n > N)d(p n, p) < ɛ In this case we also

### Assignment 7; Due Friday, November 11

Assignment 7; Due Friday, November 9.8 a The set Q is not connected because we can write it as a union of two nonempty disjoint open sets, for instance U = (, 2) and V = ( 2, ). The connected subsets are

### CONTINUED FRACTIONS AND PELL S EQUATION. Contents 1. Continued Fractions 1 2. Solution to Pell s Equation 9 References 12

CONTINUED FRACTIONS AND PELL S EQUATION SEUNG HYUN YANG Abstract. In this REU paper, I will use some important characteristics of continued fractions to give the complete set of solutions to Pell s equation.

### Notes 2 for Honors Probability and Statistics

Notes 2 for Honors Probability and Statistics Ernie Croot August 24, 2010 1 Examples of σ-algebras and Probability Measures So far, the only examples of σ-algebras we have seen are ones where the sample

### Open and Closed Sets

Open and Closed Sets Definition: A subset S of a metric space (X, d) is open if it contains an open ball about each of its points i.e., if x S : ɛ > 0 : B(x, ɛ) S. (1) Theorem: (O1) and X are open sets.

### Geometry 2: Remedial topology

Geometry 2: Remedial topology Rules: You may choose to solve only hard exercises (marked with!, * and **) or ordinary ones (marked with! or unmarked), or both, if you want to have extra problems. To have

### Math 563 Measure Theory Project 1 (Funky Functions Group) Luis Zerón, Sergey Dyachenko

Math 563 Measure Theory Project (Funky Functions Group) Luis Zerón, Sergey Dyachenko 34 Let C and C be any two Cantor sets (constructed in Exercise 3) Show that there exists a function F: [,] [,] with

### Sequences of Functions

Sequences of Functions Uniform convergence 9. Assume that f n f uniformly on S and that each f n is bounded on S. Prove that {f n } is uniformly bounded on S. Proof: Since f n f uniformly on S, then given

### (Basic definitions and properties; Separation theorems; Characterizations) 1.1 Definition, examples, inner description, algebraic properties

Lecture 1 Convex Sets (Basic definitions and properties; Separation theorems; Characterizations) 1.1 Definition, examples, inner description, algebraic properties 1.1.1 A convex set In the school geometry

### Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis

Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis Erhan Çinlar Robert J. Vanderbei February 2, 2000 Contents Sets and Functions 1 1 Sets................................... 1 Subsets.............................

### GROUPS SUBGROUPS. Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G.

Definition 1: GROUPS An operation on a set G is a function : G G G. Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called the identity, such that (i) the

### Sets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.

Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.

### Lecture 12: Sequences. 4. If E X and x is a limit point of E then there is a sequence (x n ) in E converging to x.

Lecture 12: Sequences We now recall some basic properties of limits. Theorem 0.1 (Rudin, Theorem 3.2). Let (x n ) be a sequence in a metric space X. 1. (x n ) converges to x X if and only if every neighborhood

### BANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW

BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but

### MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.436J/15.085J Fall 2008 Lecture 5 9/17/2008 RANDOM VARIABLES Contents 1. Random variables and measurable functions 2. Cumulative distribution functions 3. Discrete

### A LEBESGUE MEASURABLE SET THAT IS NOT BOREL

A LEBESGUE MEASURABLE SET THAT IS NOT BOREL SAM SCHIAVONE Tuesday, 16 October 2012 1. Outline (1 Ternary Expansions (2 The Cantor Set (3 The Cantor Ternary Function (a.k.a. The Devil s Staircase Function

### MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples

### 3 σ-algebras. Solutions to Problems

3 σ-algebras. Solutions to Problems 3.1 3.12 Problem 3.1 (i It is clearly enough to show that A, B A = A B A, because the case of N sets follows from this by induction, the induction step being A 1...

### MATH 289 PROBLEM SET 1: INDUCTION. 1. The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear:

MATH 89 PROBLEM SET : INDUCTION The induction Principle The following property of the natural numbers is intuitively clear: Axiom Every nonempty subset of the set of nonnegative integers Z 0 = {0,,, 3,

### CHAPTER 5. Product Measures

54 CHAPTER 5 Product Measures Given two measure spaces, we may construct a natural measure on their Cartesian product; the prototype is the construction of Lebesgue measure on R 2 as the product of Lebesgue

### Chapter 1. Open Sets, Closed Sets, and Borel Sets

1.4. Borel Sets 1 Chapter 1. Open Sets, Closed Sets, and Borel Sets Section 1.4. Borel Sets Note. Recall that a set of real numbers is open if and only if it is a countable disjoint union of open intervals.

### x if x 0, x if x < 0.

Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the

### Chapter 6 Finite sets and infinite sets. Copyright 2013, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.1, Slide 1

Chapter 6 Finite sets and infinite sets Copyright 013, 005, 001 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.1, Slide 1 Section 6. PROPERTIES OF THE NATURE NUMBERS 013 Pearson Education, Inc.1 Slide Recall that denotes

### 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques

4CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL: SETS, FUNCTIONS AND MATHEMATICAL INDU 1.3 Induction and Other Proof Techniques The purpose of this section is to study the proof technique known as mathematical induction.

### Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis

Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis P. Cannarsa & T. D Aprile Dipartimento di Matematica Università di Roma Tor Vergata cannarsa@mat.uniroma2.it daprile@mat.uniroma2.it aa 2006/07 Contents

### STAT 571 Assignment 1 solutions

STAT 571 Assignment 1 solutions 1. If Ω is a set and C a collection of subsets of Ω, let A be the intersection of all σ-algebras that contain C. rove that A is the σ-algebra generated by C. Solution: Let

### Our goal first will be to define a product measure on A 1 A 2.

1. Tensor product of measures and Fubini theorem. Let (A j, Ω j, µ j ), j = 1, 2, be two measure spaces. Recall that the new σ -algebra A 1 A 2 with the unit element is the σ -algebra generated by the

### Measure Theory. 1 Measurable Spaces

1 Measurable Spaces Measure Theory A measurable space is a set S, together with a nonempty collection, S, of subsets of S, satisfying the following two conditions: 1. For any A, B in the collection S,

### Sequences and Convergence in Metric Spaces

Sequences and Convergence in Metric Spaces Definition: A sequence in a set X (a sequence of elements of X) is a function s : N X. We usually denote s(n) by s n, called the n-th term of s, and write {s

### INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY

M.Sc. program in mathematics INTRODUCTORY SET THEORY Katalin Károlyi Department of Applied Analysis, Eötvös Loránd University H-1088 Budapest, Múzeum krt. 6-8. CONTENTS 1. SETS Set, equal sets, subset,

### ON TOPOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ENTROPY AND CHAOTIC MAPS ON INVERSE LIMIT SPACES. 1. Introduction

Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXVIII, 2(1999), pp. 205 211 205 ON TOPOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ENTROPY AND CHAOTIC MAPS ON INVERSE LIMIT SPACES J. S. CANOVAS Abstract. The aim of this paper is to prove the

### INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY

INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY ALEX KÜRONYA In preparation January 24, 2010 Contents 1. Basic concepts 1 2. Constructing topologies 13 2.1. Subspace topology 13 2.2. Local properties 18 2.3. Product topology

### MATH41112/61112 Ergodic Theory Lecture Measure spaces

8. Measure spaces 8.1 Background In Lecture 1 we remarked that ergodic theory is the study of the qualitative distributional properties of typical orbits of a dynamical system and that these properties

### POWER SETS AND RELATIONS

POWER SETS AND RELATIONS L. MARIZZA A. BAILEY 1. The Power Set Now that we have defined sets as best we can, we can consider a sets of sets. If we were to assume nothing, except the existence of the empty

### Metric Spaces. Chapter 1

Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence

### 3. Mathematical Induction

3. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 83 3. Mathematical Induction 3.1. First Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P (n) be a predicate with domain of discourse (over) the natural numbers N = {0, 1,,...}. If (1)

### n k=1 k=0 1/k! = e. Example 6.4. The series 1/k 2 converges in R. Indeed, if s n = n then k=1 1/k, then s 2n s n = 1 n + 1 +...

6 Series We call a normed space (X, ) a Banach space provided that every Cauchy sequence (x n ) in X converges. For example, R with the norm = is an example of Banach space. Now let (x n ) be a sequence

### Chapter 6 SEQUENCES. sn 1+1,s 1 =1 is again an abbreviation for the sequence { 1, 1 2, 1 } n N ε,d (s n,s) <ε.

Chapter 6 SEQUENCES 6.1 Sequences A sequence is a function whose domain is the set of natural numbers N. If s is a sequence, we usually denote its value at n by s n instead of s (n). We may refer to the

### LECTURE NOTES IN MEASURE THEORY. Christer Borell Matematik Chalmers och Göteborgs universitet 412 96 Göteborg (Version: January 12)

1 LECTURE NOTES IN MEASURE THEORY Christer Borell Matematik Chalmers och Göteborgs universitet 412 96 Göteborg (Version: January 12) 2 PREFACE These are lecture notes on integration theory for a eight-week

### Descriptive Set Theory

Martin Goldstern Institute of Discrete Mathematics and Geometry Vienna University of Technology Ljubljana, August 2011 Polish spaces Polish space = complete metric separable. Examples N = ω = {0, 1, 2,...}.

### Review for Final Exam

Review for Final Exam Note: Warning, this is probably not exhaustive and probably does contain typos (which I d like to hear about), but represents a review of most of the material covered in Chapters

### Math 421, Homework #5 Solutions

Math 421, Homework #5 Solutions (1) (8.3.6) Suppose that E R n and C is a subset of E. (a) Prove that if E is closed, then C is relatively closed in E if and only if C is a closed set (as defined in Definition

### Analytic Sets Vadim Kulikov Presentation 11 March 2008

Analytic Sets Vadim Kulikov Presentation 11 March 2008 Abstract. The continuous images of Borel sets are not usually Borel sets. However they are measurable and that is the main purpose of this lecture.

### Andrew McLennan January 19, Winter Lecture 5. A. Two of the most fundamental notions of the dierential calculus (recall that

Andrew McLennan January 19, 1999 Economics 5113 Introduction to Mathematical Economics Winter 1999 Lecture 5 Convergence, Continuity, Compactness I. Introduction A. Two of the most fundamental notions