Structural Design Calculation For Pergola

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Structural Design Calculation For Pergola"

Transcription

1 Structural Design Calculation For Pergola Revision :5 Prepared by :EC Date : 8/10/009

2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction... Design Code and Reference 3. Design Synopsis 4. Design Parameters 4.1 Design Load. 4. Design Wind Pressure. 4.3 Loading Combination. 5. Material Properties 6. Pergola at Area C: Loading assessment and design. 7. Pergola 3 at Area D : Loading assessment and design. 8. Pergola 4 at Area H1 : Loading assessment and design. 9. Pergola 5 at Area H : Loading assessment and design. 10. Loading schedule and Anchor Bolt Design. 11. Appendix A - Wind Topography Analysis Appendix B - Reference Design Intent Drawing Appendix C - Recycled Plastic Wood Test Report 1

3 1. Introduction This calculation is to design pergola s structure for four numbers proprietary pergola located at area C, D, H1 and H.. Design Code and Reference Code of Practice for the Structural Use of Steel 005 Code of Practice on Wind Effects Hong Kong Hong Kong Building (Construction) Regulations Design Synopsis The largest loaded span and loading area will be used for design. 4. Design Parameters For simplified analysis, Pergolas structure will be designed for weak direction. (i.e. largest wind projection area). 4.1 Design Load live load - recycle plastic wood (slat) = 0.75 kpa dead load - recycle plastic wood (slat) = 1197 kg/m 3 dead laod pergola steel structure = 7850 kg/m 3 4. Design Wind Pressure Design Wind Pressure (H<5m), q z = 1.8 kpa Topography Factor for Area D, H1, H S a = ( e *s) = (1 + 1.*0.3*1) = 1.85 Topography Factor for Area C S a = ( e *s) = (1 + 1.*0.3*0.) = Loading Combination 1) 1.4DL + 1.6LL ) 1.DL + 1.LL + 1.WL dn 3) 1.4DL + 1.4WL dn 4) 1.DL + 1.LL + 1.WL lat 5) 1.4DL + 1.4WL lat 6) 1.0DL 1.4WL dn Where DL = Dead load, LL = Live load, WL dn = downward wind load, WL lat = Lateral wind load

4 5. Material Properties Structural Steel Steel Grade = S75JR unless stated otherwise to BS EN 1005 Part 1-6 : 004 for Hot Rolled Sections and BS EN 1010 Part 1 : 006 for Hot finished hollow sections. = S75J0H for cold formed steel hollow, Strength reduced 5% to 0 N/mm to BS EN 1019 Part 1 : 006 Weld Strength = 0 N/mm Welding work shall be complicance with BS EN 1011 Part 1:1998 Electrodes to welding shall be complicance with BS EN ISO 560:005. Recycled Plastic Wood Tensile Strength = 11.9N/mm Bending Strength = 3.7 N/mm 3

5 6. Pergola at Area C : Loading assessment and design 4

6 Design for Steel Pergola at Ma Hang Headland Park Calculation is provided following load transfer path from roof deck to steel post and anchor bolt/steel base plate. Largest span, Loaded area, wind topography factor and loading combination will be used for structural member design. Pergola : Area : C Dead Load Slat Self Weight, q ds = Structural Steel Sefl weight, q dst = 1197 kg/m 7850 kg/m 3 3 Wind Load Basic wind pressure, q z = (H < 5m) 1.8 kpa Wind pressure coefficient, C p = Topography factor for Area A, S a = 1.15 Design wind pressure, q w =1.15*S a *C p *q z = (Additional 15% wind load is adopted for design) 4.81 kpa Live Load Maintenance Live load on roof deck, q l = 0.75 kpa Design for 60 (B) mm x 90 mm (D) Slat, Recycled Plastic Wood Design This Slat Plan From First Principle, 4 I sx = 1/1*60*90^3= mm Z sx = I sx / (D/) = /(90/)= mm A s = B*D = 60*90= 5400 mm 3

7 Maximum span, L = Load width for wind load, b w = Load width for live load, b l =80+60 = 1900 mm 60 mm 159 mm Dead Load self weight of slat, w ds = 1197*9.81/1000*60/1000*90/1000= kn/m Live load Maintenance live load, w ls = 0.75*159/1000= 0.1 kn/m Wind load Downward wind load, w ws = 4.81*60/1000= 0.9 kn/m Case 1 : 1.4 DL LL Factored UDL on slat, w f1 = 1.4*w ds +1.6*w ls = 0.8 kn/m Case : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f = 1.*w ds +1.*w ls +1.*w ws = 0.57 kn/m (Controlled case) Case 3 : 1.4 DL + 1.4WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f3 = 1.4*w ds +1.4*w ws = Use maximum factored UDL for Design, w fd = 0.49 kn/m 0.57 kn/m Bending design M f = 1/8*0.57*(1900/1000)^= 0.6 knm f b = M f / Z s = 0.6*10^6/81000= 3.1 N/mm < 11.9 N/mm Shear Design V f = 1/*0.8*1900/1000= 0.7 kn f v = V f / A s = 0.7*1000/5400= 0.05 N/mm < 0.6*11.9 = 7.14 N/mm

8 Connection design between 60x90mm slat and 80x50x4mm steel plate Design this steel plate connection Section Design this steel plate connection Section Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Bolt design M10 Grade 8.8 Bolt, A b = No. of bolt, n = 58 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn Bolt Shear stress, f vb = V f / (n*a b ) = 3.6 N/mm < 375 N/mm 80 mm (D) x 50 mm (B) x 4 mm steel plate Moment of inertia, I=1/1*4*80^3= mm 4 Elastic modulus, Z = /(80/)= 467 mm 3 Shear Area, A = 80*4= 30 mm v Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn No. of plate provided per slat, n = Plate shear stress, f vp = V f / A v / n = 0.66 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Eccentricity, e = Factored eccentric moment, M e = V f *e = 0.4*5/1000= 5 mm 0.01 knm Plate bending stress, f bp = M e / Z / n = 0.01*10^6//467= 1.17 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld design for 80x50x4mm steel plate and 00x100x.6kg/m GMS RHS Weld length provided, L w = 80*= 160 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = 1/1*80^3= 4667 mm 3 w Weld Elastic modulus, Zw = 4667/(80/)= 1067 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = Factored Eccentric moment, M e = 0.4 kn 0.01 knm

9 Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w = 0.4*1000/160=.63 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M e / Z w = 0.01*10^6/1067= 9.37 N/mm Combined weld stress, f ew = (f bw^+f vw^)^1/ = 9.73 N/mm Provide 4 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*4= 616 N/mm > 9.73 N/mm Design for 00x100x.6kg/m GMS RHS supporting slat Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this RHS Section Plan Design 00x100x.6kg/m RHS as cantilever beam 00x100x.6kg/m GMS RHS I = Z = A = mm mm3 870 mm Length of RHS = 000 mm No. of Point load from slat, n = 14 Factored Self weight of RHS = 1.*.6*9.81/1000= 0.7 kn/m Equivalent Factored UDL on RHS, w = 0.4**14/(000/1000)= 5.88 kn/m 6.15 kn/m Cantilever span, L = Factored moment, M f = Factored Shear, V f = 1/*6.15*(1764/1000)^= 6.15*1764/1000= 1764 mm 9.57 knm kn

10 Bending design f b = M f / Z = 9.57*10^6/149000= 64.3 N/mm < 0 N/mm Shear design f v = V f / A v = 10.85*1000/870= 3.78 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Deflection design UDL on RHS, wu = 5.88/1.= 4.9 kn/m E = N/mm d = wl^4 / 8EI = 3. mm < L / 180 = mm Design of Bolt joint at 00x100x.6kg/m vertical RHS post supporting RHS cantilever beam Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this bolt joint Loaded Unloaded Section Section Consider only larger projection is loaded and small projection unload for worst case design. Bolt design Area per bolt, A b = No. of bolt provided, n = mm For the bolt group, I xx = I yy = I p = I xx + I yy = mm mm 0000 mm Factored Direct Shear for bolt group, V f = Factored Moment for bolt group, M f = Distance of bolt group centroid to one bol ( ) 1/ = kn 9.57 knm 71 mm

11 Factored shear from bending, V fb = 9.57*10^6*71/0000/1000= kn For conservative design Factored design shear for bolt, V fd = V fb + V f = = 44.8 kn Bolt shear stress, f vb = V fd / A b = 44.8*1000/157= N/mm < 375 N/mm Design of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS Vertical post Design this steel post Each 00x100x.6kg/m RHS Vertical Post I = mm 4 Z = mm 3 A = 870 mm r = 7 mm Effective Height of RHS post, H = 750 mm No of post provided, n = Case 1 : 1.4DL+1.6LL Load widith per RHS post bay, b = Load length per RHS post bay, L = Load area per RHS post, A = 1.9*.5= No. of slat at roof deck, n = Height of RHS post, H = Dead load: self weight of slat = self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS = Self weight of 160x80x14.4kg/m SHS = 1.9 m.5 m 4.75 m m 0.063*1.9*14=.6*9.81/1000*.5= 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 1.68 kn 0.55 kn 0.78 kn 3.01 kn

12 Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*4.75= 3.56 kn DL eccentric moment, M de = (1.33/3*3.01*1.33/-0.441/3*3.01*0.441/)= 0.78 knm LL eccentric moment, M le = (1.33/3*3.56*1.33/-0.441/3*3.56*0.441/)= 0.9 knm w = 1.4DL LL = 9.91 kn Axial deisgn P fd = 9.91 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 9.91*1000/870/= 1.73 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, p a = 195 N/mm > 1.73 N/mm Bending design Eccentric moment, M fe = (1.33/3*9.91*1.33/-0.441/3*9.91*0.441/)/= 1.8 knm f b = M f e / Z = 1.8*10^6/149000= 8.59 N/mm < 0 N/mm Case : 1.DL+1.LL+1.WL (downward) 1.DL+1.LL+1.WL (downward) Section Factored Self weight of nos. RHS post = 1.*.6*9.81/1000*750/1000*= 0.95 kn Factored Axial compression from RHS beam, P f = kn Factored axial compression, P fd = 11.8 kn Factored moment, M f = 9.57 knm Axial deisgn P fd = 11.8 kn f a = P fd / A/n = 11.8*1000/870/=.06 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, p a = 195 N/mm >.06 N/mm

13 Bending design M f = 9.57 knm f b = M f / Z/ n = 9.57*10^6/149000/= 3.11 N/mm < 0 N/mm Case 3 : 1.DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (lateral) Load widith per RHS post bay, b = Load length per RHS post bay, L = Load area per SHS post, A = 1.9*.5= No. of slat at roof deck, n = Height of SHS post, H = Dead load: self weight of slat = self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS = Self weight of 160x180x14.4kg/m SHS = 1.9 m.5 m 4.75 m m 0.063*1.9*14=.6*9.81/1000*.5= 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 1.68 kn 0.55 kn 0.78 kn 3.01 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*4.75= 3.56 kn Lateral wind load assessment: Area I 500 Area II 00 Area III 750 Lateral wind load Section (Lateral wind load) Design wind pressure, q w =S a *C p *q z = 4.81 kpa I- Roof Deck II- 00x100x.3kg/m RHS post-nos. Of 0.7m long III- 00x100x.3kg/m SHS post nos. Of.75m long (1) () (3)=(1)*()*qw (4) (5)=(3)*(4) Area Project area, A (m) Nos of Projected Wind shear, S Level arm, L Moment, M b x d Area, n (kn) (m) (knm) I 0.09 x II 0.5 x III 0.1 x

14 Design factored Axial compression, P f = 1.DL + 1.LL= 1.* *3.56= 7.88 kn Design factored lateral wind shear, V f = 1.*S = 1.*3.95= 4.74 kn Design factored bending moment, M f = 1.*M = 1.*7.39= 8.87 knm Axial deisgn P fd = 7.88 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 7.88*1000/870/= 1.37 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 1.37 N/mm Shear design V f = 4.74 kn f v = V f / A /n= 4.74*1000/870/= 0.83 N/mm > 0.6*0 N/mm Bending design M f = 8.87 knm = 13 N/mm f b = M f / Z /n= 8.87*10^6/149000/= 9.77 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Consider one post Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, M f = 7.88 kn 4.74 kn 8.87 knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = 7.88*1000/660/= 5.97 N/mm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w /n = 4.74*1000/660/= 3.59 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 8.87*10^6/13013/= N/mm For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 350 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 350 N/mm Case 4 : 1.4DL+1.4WL (lateral) Design factored Axial compression, P f = 1.4DL 1.4*3.01= 4.1 kn Design factored lateral wind shear, V f = 1.4*S = 1.4*3.95= 5.53 kn Design factored bending moment, M f = 1.4*M = 1.4*7.39= knm Axial deisgn P fd = 4.1 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 4.1*1000/870/= 0.73 N/mm

15 slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 0.73 N/mm Shear design V f = 5.53 kn f v = V f / A/n = 5.53*1000/870/= 0.96 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm Bending design M f = knm = 13 N/mm f b = M f / Z/n = 10.35*10^6/149000/ = N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, M f = 4.1 kn 5.53 kn knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = 4.1*1000/660/= 3.19 N/mm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w /n = 5.53*1000/660/= 4.19 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 10.35*10^6/13013/= N/mm For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 405 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 405 N/mm Case 5 : 1.4DL+1.4WL (downward) Load widith per SHS post bay, b = 1.9 m Load length per SHS post bay, L =.5 m Load area per SHS post, A = 1.9*.5= 4.75 m No. of slat at roof deck, n = 14 Height of SHS post, H =.75 m Dead load: self weight of slat = 0.063*1.9*14= 1.68 kn self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS =.6*9.81/1000*.5= 0.55 kn Self weight of nos.160 x80x14.4kg/m SHS = 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 0.78 kn 3.01 kn 1.4DL = 1.4*3.01= 4.14 kn

16 Downward wind load : Nos. of slat, n = 14 design wind pressure, qw = 4.81 kpa load width per slat, B = 60 mm (Section)

17 Downward wind load, WL downward = 60/1000*1.9*14*4.81= 7.68 kn Eccentric moment, M e,downward = 7.68*1.935/= 7.43 knm 1.4DL * WL downward = 1.4*M e,downward = 13.6 kn knm Axial deisgn P fd = 13.6 kn f a = P fd / A /n= *1000/870/=.37 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm >.37 N/mm Bending design M f = knm f b = M f / Z /n= 10.40*10^6/149000/ = N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored moment, M f = 13.6 kn knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = *1000/660 /= 10.9 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 10.40*10^6/13013/ = N/mm For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 410 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 410 N/mm Case 6 : 1.0DL-1.4WL (downward) Load widith per SHS post bay, b = 1.9 m Load length per SHS post bay, L =.5 m Load area per SHS post, A = 1.9*.5= 4.75 m No. of slat at roof deck, n = 14 Height of SHS post, H =.75 m Dead load: self weight of slat = 0.063*1.9*14= 1.68 kn self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS =.6*9.81/1000*.5= 0.55 kn Self weight of nos.160 x80x14.4kg/m SHS = 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 0.78 kn 3.01 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*4.75= 3.56 kn 1.0DL = 1.0*3.01= 3.01 kn

18 Downward wind load : Nos. of slat, n = 14 design wind pressure, qw = 4.81 kpa load width per slat, B = 60 mm (Section) Downward wind load, WL downward = 60/1000*1.9*14*4.81= 7.68 kn Eccentric moment, M e,downward = 7.68*1.935/= 7.43 knm 1.0DL * WL downward = 1.4*M e,downward = 11.9 kn knm Axial deisgn P fd = 11.9 kn f a = P fd / A /n= *1000//=.07 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm >.07 N/mm Bending design M f = knm f b = M f / Z /n= 10.40*10^6/149000/ = N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored moment, M f = 11.9 kn knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = *1000/660 /= 9.01 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 10.40*10^6/13013/ = N/mm For conservative design,

19 Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 409 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 409 N/mm

20 Design of anchor bolt Plan Consider Case 1 and Case 5 for steel post, Factored Axial compression, P f = 13.6 kn (Case 5 control) Factored Shear, V f = 5.5 kn (Case 4 control) Factored moment, Mf = knm (Case 5 control) Anchor bolt design is performed by Hilti's computer program. Please refer next page. Provide 8 nos. HIT-RE500/HAS-E M16x15 bolt

21 Loading schedule (unfactored load) Item DL LL DL+LL Lateral wind Upward/downward wind Axial (kn) Axial (kn) Axial (kn) Shear (kn) Moment (knm) Axial (kn) Pergola 4 at Area H

22 7. Pergola 3 at Area D : Loading assessment and design 5

23 Design for Steel Pergola at Ma Hang Headland Park Calculation is provided following load transfer path from roof deck to steel post and anchor bolt/steel base plate. Largest span, Loaded area, wind topography factor and loading combination will be used for structural member design. Pergola : 3 Area : D Dead Load Slat Self Weight, q ds = Structural Steel Sefl weight, q dst = 1197 kg/m 7850 kg/m 3 3 Wind Load Basic wind pressure, q z = (H < 5m) 1.8 kpa Wind pressure coefficient, C p = Topography factor for Area A, S a = 1.8 Design wind pressure, q w =1.15*S a *C p *q z = (Additional 15% wind load is adopted for design) 7.6 kpa Live Load Maintenance Live load on roof deck, q l = 0.75 kpa Design for 60 (B) mm x 90 mm (D) Slat, Recycled Plastic Wood Design This Slat Plan From First Principle, 4 I sx = 1/1*60*90^3= mm Z sx = I sx / (D/) = /(90/)= mm A s = B*D = 60*90= 5400 mm 3

24 Maximum span, L = = Load width for wind load, b w = Load width for live load, b l =80+60 = 863 mm 60 mm 153 mm Dead Load self weight of slat, w ds = 1197*9.81/1000*60/1000*90/1000= kn/m Live load Maintenance live load, w ls = 0.75*153/1000= 0.11 kn/m Wind load Downward wind load, w ws = 7.6*60/1000= 0.46 kn/m Case 1 : 1.4 DL LL Factored UDL on slat, w f1 = 1.4*w ds +1.6*w ls = 0.6 kn/m Case : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f = 1.*w ds +1.*w ls +1.*w ws = 0.76 kn/m (Controlled case) Case 3 : 1.4 DL + 1.4WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f3 = 1.4*w ds +1.4*w ws = Use maximum factored UDL for Design, w fd = 0.73 kn/m 0.76 kn/m Bending design M f = 1/8*0.76*(863/1000)^= 0.78 knm f b = M f / Z s = 0.78*10^6/81000= 9.63 N/mm < 11.9 N/mm Shear Design V f = 1/*0.6*863/1000= 0.37 kn f = V / A = 0.37*1000/5400= N/mm < 0.6*11.9 v f s = 7.14 N/mm Connection design between 60x90mm slat and 80x50x4mm steel plate Design this steel plate connection Section Design this steel plate connection Section

25 Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Bolt design M10 Grade 8.8 Bolt, A b = No. of bolt, n = 58 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn Bolt Shear stress, f vb = V f / (n*a b ) = 3.6 N/mm < 375 N/mm 80 mm (D) x 50 mm (B) x 4 mm steel plate Moment of inertia, I 1/1*4*80^3= mm 4 Elastic modulus, Z = /(80/)= 467 mm 3 Shear Area, A = 80*4= 30 mm v Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn No. of plate provided per slat, n = Plate shear stress, f vp = V f / A v / n = 0.66 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Eccentricity, e = Factored eccentric moment, M e = V f *e = 0.4*5/1000= 5 mm 0.01 knm Plate bending stress, f bp = M e / Z / n = 0.01*10^6//467= 1.17 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld design for 80x50x4mm steel plate and 00x100x.6kg/m GMS RHS Weld length provided, L w = 80*= 160 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = 1/1*80^3= 4667 mm 3 w Weld Elastic modulus, Zw = 4667/(80/)= 1067 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = Factored Eccentric moment, M e = 0.4 kn 0.01 knm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w = 0.4*1000/160=.63 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M e / Z w = 0.01*10^6/1067= 9.37 N/mm Combined weld stress, f ew = (f bw^+f vw^)^1/ = 9.73 N/mm Provide 4 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*4= 616 N/mm > 9.73 N/mm

26 Design for 00x100x.6kg/m GMS RHS supporting slat Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this RHS Section Plan Design 00x100x.6kg/m RHS as cantilever beam 00x100x.6kg/m GMS RHS I = Z = A = mm mm3 870 mm Length of RHS = 131 mm No. of Point load from slat, n = 14 Factored Self weight of RHS = 1.*.6*9.81/1000= 0.7 kn/m Equivalent Factored UDL on RHS, w = 0.4**14/(131/1000)= 5.5 kn/m 5.79 kn/m Cantilever span, L = 1764 mm Factored moment, M f = 1/*5.79*(1764/1000)^= 9.01 knm Factored Shear, V f = 5.79*1764/1000= 10.1 kn Bending design f b = M f / Z = 9.01*10^6/149000= N/mm < 0 N/mm Shear design f v = V f / A v = 10.1*1000/870= 3.56 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Deflection design UDL on RHS, wu = 5.5/1.= 4.6 kn/m E = N/mm d = wl^4 / 8EI = 3.87 mm < L / 180 = mm

27 Design of Bolt joint at 00x100x.6kg/m vertical RHS post supporting RHS cantilever beam Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this bolt joint Loaded Unloaded Section Section Consider only larger projection is loaded and small projection unload for worst case design. Bolt design Area per bolt, A b = No. of bolt provided, n = mm For the bolt group, I xx = I yy = I p = I xx + I yy = mm mm 0000 mm Factored Direct Shear for bolt group, V f = Factored Moment for bolt group, M f = 10.1 kn 9.01 knm Distance of bolt group centroid to one bolt(= ) 1/ = 71 mm Factored shear from bending, V fb = 9.01*10^6*71/0000/1000= kn For conservative design Factored design shear for bolt, V fd = V fb + V f = = 4. kn Bolt shear stress, f vb = V fd / A b = 4.*1000/157= N/mm < 375 N/mm

28 Design of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS Vertical post Design this steel post Each 00x100x.6kg/m RHS Vertical Post I = mm 4 Z = mm 3 A = 870 mm r = 7 mm Effective Height of RHS post, H = No of post provided, n = 750 mm Case 1 : 1.4DL+1.6LL Load widith per RHS post bay, b = Load length per RHS post bay, L = Load area per RHS post, A =.77*.131= No. of slat at roof deck, n = Height of RHS post, H = Dead load: self weight of slat = self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS = Self weight of 160x80x14.4kg/m SHS =.77 m.131 m 5.91 m m 0.063*.77*14=.6*9.81/1000*.131= 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*=.44 kn 0.47 kn 0.78 kn 3.69 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*5.91= 4.43 kn DL eccentric moment, M de = (1.33/3*3.69*1.33/-0.441/3*3.69*0.441/)= 0.96 knm LL eccentric moment, M le = (1.33/3*4.43*1.33/-0.441/3*4.43*0.441/)= 1.15 knm w = 1.4DL LL = 1.54 kn

29 Axial deisgn P fd = 1.54 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 1.54*1000/870/=.13 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, p a = 195 N/mm >.13 N/mm Bending design Eccentric moment, M fe = (1.33/3*1.54*1.33/-0.441/3*1.54*0.441/)/= 1.59 knm f b = M f e / Z = 1.59*10^6/149000= N/mm < 0 N/mm Case : 1.DL+1.LL+1.WL (downward) 1.DL+1.LL+1.WL (downward) Section Factored Self weight of nos. RHS post = 1.*.6*9.81/1000*750/1000*= 0.95 kn Factored Axial compression from RHS beam, P f = 10.1 kn Factored axial compression, P fd = kn Factored moment, M f = 9.01 knm Axial deisgn P fd = kn f a = P fd / A/n = 11.16*1000/870/= 1.94 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, p a = 195 N/mm > 1.94 N/mm Bending design M f = 9.01 knm f b = M f / Z/ n = 9.01*10^6/149000/= 30.3 N/mm < 0 N/mm

30 Case 3 : 1.DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (lateral) Load widith per RHS post bay, b = Load length per RHS post bay, L = Load area per SHS post, A =.77*.131= No. of slat at roof deck, n = Height of SHS post, H = Dead load: self weight of slat = self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS = Self weight of 160x180x14.4kg/m SHS =.77 m.131 m 5.91 m m 0.063*.77*14=.6*9.81/1000*.131= 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*=.44 kn 0.47 kn 0.78 kn 3.69 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*5.91= 4.43 kn Lateral wind load assessment: Area I 500 Area II 00 Area III 750 Lateral wind load Section (Lateral wind load) Design wind pressure, q w =S a *C p *q z = 7.6 kpa I- Roof Deck II- 00x100x.3kg/m RHS post-nos. Of 0.7m long III- 00x100x.3kg/m SHS post nos. Of.75m long (1) () (3)=(1)*()*qw (4) (5)=(3)*(4) Area Project area, A (m) Nos of Projected Wind shear, S Level arm, L Moment, M b x d Area, n (kn) (m) (knm) I 0.09 x II 0.5 x III 0.1 x Design factored Axial compression, P f = 1.DL + 1.LL= 1.* *4.43= 9.74 kn Design factored lateral wind shear, V f = 1.*S = 1.*6.85= 8. kn Design factored bending moment, M f = 1.*M = 1.*13.35= 16.0 knm

31 Axial deisgn P fd = 9.74 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 9.74*1000/870/= 1.7 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 1.7 N/mm Shear design V f = 8. kn f v = V f / A /n= 8.*1000/870/= 1.43 N/mm > 0.6*0 N/mm Bending design M f = 16.0 knm = 13 N/mm f b = M f / Z /n= 16.0*10^6/149000/= N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Consider one post Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, M f = 9.74 kn 8. kn 16.0 knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = 9.74*1000/660/= 7.38 N/mm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w /n = 8.*1000/660/= 6.3 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 16.0*10^6/13013/= N/mm For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 69 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 69 N/mm Case 4 : 1.4DL+1.4WL (lateral) Design factored Axial compression, P f = 1.4DL 1.4*3.69= 5.17 kn Design factored lateral wind shear, V f = 1.4*S = 1.4*6.85= 9.59 kn Design factored bending moment, M f = 1.4*M = 1.4*13.35= knm Axial deisgn P fd = 5.17 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 5.17*1000/870/= 0.9 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 0.9 N/mm Shear design

32 V f = 9.59 kn f v = V f / A/n = 9.59*1000/870/= 1.67 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm Bending design M f = knm = 13 N/mm f b = M f / Z/n = 18.69*10^6/149000/ = 6.7 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, M f = 5.17 kn 9.59 kn knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = 5.17*1000/660/= 3.9 N/mm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w /n = 9.59*1000/660/= 7.7 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 18.69*10^6/13013/= N/mm For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 79 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 79 N/mm Case 5 : 1.4DL+1.4WL (downward) Load widith per SHS post bay, b =.77 m Load length per SHS post bay, L =.131 m Load area per SHS post, A =.77*.131= 5.91 m No. of slat at roof deck, n = 14 Height of SHS post, H =.75 m Dead load: self weight of slat = 0.063*.77*14=.44 kn self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS =.6*9.81/1000*.131= 0.47 kn Self weight of nos.160 x80x14.4kg/m SHS = 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 0.78 kn 3.69 kn 1.4DL = 1.4*3.69= kn

33 Downward wind load : Nos. of slat, n = 14 design wind pressure, qw = 7.6 kpa load width per slat, B = 60 mm (Section) Downward wind load, WL downward = 60/1000*.77*14*7.6= kn Eccentric moment, M e,downward = 17.74*1.935/= knm 1.4DL * WL downward = 1.4*M e,downward = 3.1 kn 4.04 knm Axial deisgn P fd = 3.1 kn f a = P fd / A /n= *1000/870/= 5.59 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 5.59 N/mm Bending design M f = 4.04 knm f b = M f / Z /n= 4.04*10^6/149000/ = 80.6 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored moment, M f = 3.1 kn 4.04 knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = *1000/660 /= 4.9 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 4.04*10^6/13013/ = N/mm

34 1/ Combined weld stress, f ew = (f bw +f aw ) = (93.08^+4.9^)^0.5= 93 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 93 N/mm Case 6 : 1.0DL-1.4WL (downward) Load widith per SHS post bay, b =.77 m Load length per SHS post bay, L =.131 m Load area per SHS post, A =.77*.131= 5.91 m No. of slat at roof deck, n = 14 Height of SHS post, H =.75 m Dead load: self weight of slat = 0.063*.77*14=.44 kn self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS =.6*9.81/1000*.131= 0.47 kn Self weight of nos.160 x80x14.4kg/m SHS = 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 0.78 kn 3.69 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*5.91= 4.43 kn 1.0DL = 1.0*3.69= 3.69 kn Downward wind load : Nos. of slat, n = 14 design wind pressure, qw = 7.6 kpa load width per slat, B = 60 mm (Section) Downward wind load, WL downward = 60/1000*.77*14*7.6= kn Eccentric moment, M e,downward = 17.74*1.935/= knm 1.0DL * WL downward = 1.4*M e,downward =.9 kn 4.04 knm Axial deisgn

35 P fd =.9 kn f a = P fd / A /n=.906*1000//= 3.99 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/7= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 3.99 N/mm Bending design M f = 4.04 knm f b = M f / Z /n= 4.04*10^6/149000/ = 80.6 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored moment, M f =.9 kn 4.04 knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n =.906*1000/660 /= N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 4.04*10^6/13013/ = N/mm For conservative design, 1/ Combined weld stress, f ew = (f bw +f aw ) = (93.08^+.906^)^0.5= 93 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 93 N/mm Design of anchor bolt Plan Consider Case 1 and Case 5 for steel post, Factored Axial compression, P f = 3.1 kn (Case 5 control) Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, Mf = 9.6 kn 4.04 knm Anchor bolt design is performed by Hilti's computer program. Please refer next page. Provide 8 nos. HIT-RE500/HAS-E M16x15 bolt (Case 4 control) (Case 5 control)

36 Loading schedule (unfactored load) Item DL LL DL+LL Lateral wind Upward/downward wind Axial (kn) Axial (kn) Axial (kn) Shear (kn) Moment (knm) Axial (kn) Pergola 4 at Area H

37 8. Pergola 4 at Area H1 : Loading assessment and design 6

38 Design for Steel Pergola at Ma Hang Headland Park Calculation is provided following load transfer path from roof deck to steel post and anchor bolt/steel base plate. Largest span, Loaded area, wind topography factor and loading combination will be used for structural member design. Pergola : 4 Area : H1 Dead Load Slat Self Weight, q ds = Structural Steel Sefl weight, q dst = 1197 kg/m 7850 kg/m 3 3 Wind Load Basic wind pressure, q z = (H < 5m) 1.8 kpa Wind pressure coefficient, C p = Topography factor for Area A, S a = 1.8 Design wind pressure, q w =1.15*S a *C p *q z = (Additional 15% wind load is adopted for design) 7.6 kpa Live Load Maintenance Live load on roof deck, q l = 0.75 kpa Design for 60 (B) mm x 90 mm (D) Slat, Recycled Plastic Wood Design This Slat Plan From First Principle, 4 I sx = 1/1*60*90^3= mm Z sx = I sx / (D/) = /(90/)= mm A s = B*D = 60*90= 5400 mm 3

39 Maximum span, L = Load width for wind load, b w = Load width for live load, b l =80+60 = 100 mm 60 mm 158 mm Dead Load self weight of slat, w ds = 1197*9.81/1000*60/1000*90/1000= kn/m Live load Maintenance live load, w ls = 0.75*158/1000= 0.1 kn/m Wind load Downward wind load, w ws = 7.6*60/1000= 0.46 kn/m Case 1 : 1.4 DL LL Factored UDL on slat, w f1 = 1.4*w ds +1.6*w ls = 0.8 kn/m Case : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f = 1.*w ds +1.*w ls +1.*w ws = 0.77 kn/m (Controlled case) Case 3 : 1.4 DL + 1.4WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f3 = 1.4*w ds +1.4*w ws = Use maximum factored UDL for Design, w fd = 0.73 kn/m 0.77 kn/m Bending design M f = 1/8*0.77*(100/1000)^= 0.4 knm f b = M f / Z s = 0.4*10^6/81000= 5.19 N/mm < 11.9 N/mm Shear Design V f = 1/*0.8*100/1000= 0.9 kn f = V / A = 0.9*1000/5400= N/mm < 0.6*11.9 v f s = 7.14 N/mm Connection design between 60x90mm slat and 80x50x4mm steel plate Design this steel plate connection Section Design this steel plate connection Section

40 Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Bolt design M10 Grade 8.8 Bolt, A b = No. of bolt, n = 58 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn Bolt Shear stress, f vb = V f / (n*a b ) = 3.6 N/mm < 375 N/mm 80 mm (D) x 50 mm (B) x 4 mm steel plate Moment of inertia, I 1/1*4*80^3= mm 4 Elastic modulus, Z = /(80/)= 467 mm 3 Shear Area, A = 80*4= 30 mm v Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn No. of plate provided per slat, n = Plate shear stress, f vp = V f / A v / n = 0.66 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Eccentricity, e = Factored eccentric moment, M e = V f *e = 0.4*5/1000= 5 mm 0.01 knm Plate bending stress, f bp = M e / Z / n = 0.01*10^6//467= 1.17 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld design for 80x50x4mm steel plate and 160x80x17.5kg/m GMS RHS Weld length provided, L w = 80*= 160 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = 1/1*80^3= 4667 mm 3 w Weld Elastic modulus, Zw = 4667/(80/)= 1067 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = Factored Eccentric moment, M e = 0.4 kn 0.01 knm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w = 0.4*1000/160=.63 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M e / Z w = 0.01*10^6/1067= 9.37 N/mm Combined weld stress, f ew = (f bw^+f vw^)^1/ = 9.73 N/mm Provide 4 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*4= 616 N/mm > 9.73 N/mm

41 Design for 160x80x17.5kg/m GMS RHS supporting slat Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this RHS Section Plan Design 160x80x17.5kg/m RHS as cantilever beam 160x80x14.4kg/m GMS RHS I = Z = A = mm mm mm Length of RHS = 004 mm No. of Point load from slat, n = 13 Factored Self weight of RHS = 1.*.6*9.81/1000= 0.7 kn/m Equivalent Factored UDL on RHS, w = 0.4**13/(004/1000)= 5.45 kn/m 5.7 kn/m Cantilever span, L = 1476 mm Factored moment, M f = 1/*5.7*(1476/1000)^= 6.3 knm Factored Shear, V f = 5.7*1476/1000= 8.44 kn Bending design f b = M f / Z = 6.3*10^6/76500= N/mm < 0 N/mm Shear design f v = V f / A v = 8.44*1000/1840= 4.59 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Deflection design UDL on RHS, wu = 5.45/1.= 4.54 kn/m E = N/mm d = wl^4 / 8EI = 7.3 mm < L / 180 = mm

42 Design of Bolt joint at 160x80x17.5kg/m vertical RHS post supporting RHS cantilever beam Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this bolt joint Loaded Unloaded Section Section Consider only larger projection is loaded and small projection unload for worst case design. Bolt design Area per bolt, A b = No. of bolt provided, n = mm For the bolt group, I xx = I yy = I p = I xx + I yy = mm mm 0000 mm Factored Direct Shear for bolt group, V f = Factored Moment for bolt group, M f = 8.44 kn 6.3 knm Distance of bolt group centroid to one bol ( ) 1/ = 71 mm Factored shear from bending, V fb = 6.3*10^6*71/0000/1000=.1 kn For conservative design Factored design shear for bolt, V fd = V fb + V f = = kn Bolt shear stress, f vb = V fd / A b = 30.56*1000/157= N/mm < 375 N/mm

43 Design of 160x80x17.5kg/m RHS Vertical post Design this steel post Each 160x80x17.5kg/m RHS Vertical Post I = mm 4 Z = mm 3 A = 1840 mm r = 58 mm Effective Height of RHS post, H = 750 mm No of post provided, n = Case 1 : 1.4DL+1.6LL Load widith per RHS post bay, b = Load length per RHS post bay, L = Load area per RHS post, A =.1*.005= No. of slat at roof deck, n = Height of RHS post, H = Dead load: self weight of slat = self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS = Self weight of 160x80x14.4kg/m SHS =.1 m.005 m 4.1 m m 0.063*.1*13=.6*9.81/1000*.005= 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 1.7 kn 0.44 kn 0.78 kn.94 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*4.1= 3.16 kn DL eccentric moment, M de = (1.33/3*.94*1.33/-0.441/3*.94*0.441/)= 0.76 knm LL eccentric moment, M le = (1.33/3*3.16*1.33/-0.441/3*3.16*0.441/)= 0.8 knm w = 1.4DL LL = 9.17 kn

44 Axial deisgn P fd = 9.17 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 9.17*1000/1840/=.49 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/58= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, p a = 195 N/mm >.49 N/mm Bending design Eccentric moment, M fe = (1.33/3*9.17*1.33/-0.441/3*9.17*0.441/)/= 1.19 knm f b = M f e / Z = 1.19*10^6/76500= N/mm < 0 N/mm Case : 1.DL+1.LL+1.WL (downward) 1.DL+1.LL+1.WL (downward) Section Factored Self weight of nos. RHS post = 1.*.6*9.81/1000*750/1000*= 0.95 kn Factored Axial compression from RHS beam, P f = 8.44 kn Factored axial compression, P fd = 9.39 kn Factored moment, M f = 6.3 knm Axial deisgn P fd = 9.39 kn f a = P fd / A/n = 9.39*1000/1840/=.55 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/58= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, p a = 195 N/mm >.55 N/mm Bending design M f = 6.3 knm f b = M f / Z/ n = 6.3*10^6/76500/= 40.7 N/mm < 0 N/mm

45 Case 3 : 1.DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (lateral) Load widith per RHS post bay, b = Load length per RHS post bay, L = Load area per SHS post, A =.1*.005= No. of slat at roof deck, n = Height of SHS post, H = Dead load: self weight of slat = self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS = Self weight of 160x180x14.4kg/m SHS =.1 m.005 m 4.1 m m 0.063*.1*13=.6*9.81/1000*.005= 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 1.7 kn 0.44 kn 0.78 kn.94 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*4.1= 3.16 kn Lateral wind load assessment: Area I 500 Area II 160 Area III 750 Lateral wind load Section (Lateral wind load) Design wind pressure, q w =S a *C p *q z = 7.6 kpa I- Roof Deck II- 160x80x14.4kg/m RHS post-nos. Of 0.7m long III- 160x80x14.4kg/m SHS post -.75m long (1) () (3)=(1)*()*qw (4) (5)=(3)*(4) Area Project area, A (m) Nos of Projected Wind shear, S Level arm, L Moment, M b x d Area, n (kn) (m) (knm) I 0.09 x II 0.5 x III 0.08 x Design factored Axial compression, P f = 1.DL + 1.LL= 1.*.94+1.*3.16= 7.3 kn Design factored lateral wind shear, V f = 1.*S = 1.*5.55= 6.66 kn Design factored bending moment, M f = 1.*M = 1.*10.93= 13.1 knm

46 Axial deisgn P fd = 7.3 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 7.3*1000/1840/= 1.99 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/58= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 1.99 N/mm Shear design V f = 6.66 kn f v = V f / A /n= 6.66*1000/1840/= 1.81 N/mm > 0.6*0 N/mm Bending design M f = 13.1 knm = 13 N/mm f b = M f / Z /n= 13.1*10^6/76500/= N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Consider one post Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, M f = 7.3 kn 6.66 kn 13.1 knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = 7.3*1000/660/= 5.55 N/mm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w /n = 6.66*1000/660/= 5.05 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 13.1*10^6/13013/= N/mm For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 515 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 515 N/mm Case 4 : 1.4DL+1.4WL (lateral) Design factored Axial compression, P f = 1.4DL 1.4*.94= 4.1 kn Design factored lateral wind shear, V f = 1.4*S = 1.4*5.55= 7.77 kn Design factored bending moment, M f = 1.4*M = 1.4*10.93= 15.3 knm Axial deisgn P fd = 4.1 kn f a = P fd / A /n= 4.1*1000/1840/= 1.1 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/58= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 1.1 N/mm

47 Shear design V f = 7.77 kn f v = V f / A/n = 7.77*1000/1840/=.11 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm Bending design M f = 15.3 knm = 13 N/mm f b = M f / Z/n = 15.3*10^6/76500/ = 100 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, M f = 4.1 kn 7.77 kn 15.3 knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = 4.1*1000/660/= 3.1 N/mm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w /n = 7.77*1000/660/= 5.89 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = 15.3*10^6/13013/= N/mm For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 597 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 597 N/mm Case 5 : 1.4DL+1.4WL (downward) Load widith per SHS post bay, b =.1 m Load length per SHS post bay, L =.005 m Load area per SHS post, A =.1*.005= 4.1 m No. of slat at roof deck, n = 13 Height of SHS post, H =.75 m Dead load: self weight of slat = 0.063*.1*13= 1.7 kn self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS =.6*9.81/1000*.005= 0.44 kn Self weight of nos.160 x80x14.4kg/m SHS = 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 0.78 kn.94 kn 1.4DL = 1.4*.94= kn

48 Downward wind load : Nos. of slat, n = 13 design wind pressure, qw = 7.6 kpa load width per slat, B = 60 mm (Section) Downward wind load, WL downward = 60/1000*.1*13*7.6= 1.48 kn Eccentric moment, M e,downward = 1.48*1.935/= 1.07 knm 1.4DL * WL downward = 1.4*M e,downward = 3. kn knm Axial deisgn P fd = 3. kn f a = P fd / A /n= 3.344*1000/1840/= 6.31 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/58= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 6.31 N/mm Bending design M f = knm f b = M f / Z /n= *10^6/76500/ = N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored moment, M f = 3. kn knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = 3.344*1000/660 /= 17.6 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = *10^6/13013/ = N/mm

49 For conservative design, Combined weld stress, f ew = f bw +f aw +f vw = = 667 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 667 N/mm Case 6 : 1.0DL-1.4WL (downward) Load widith per SHS post bay, b =.1 m Load length per SHS post bay, L =.005 m Load area per SHS post, A =.1*.005= 4.1 m No. of slat at roof deck, n = 13 Height of SHS post, H =.75 m Dead load: self weight of slat = 0.063*.1*13= 1.7 kn self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS =.6*9.81/1000*.005= 0.44 kn Self weight of nos.160 x80x14.4kg/m SHS = 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 0.78 kn.94 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*4.1= 3.16 kn 1.0DL = 1.0*.94=.94 kn Downward wind load : Nos. of slat, n = 13 design wind pressure, qw = 7.6 kpa load width per slat, B = 60 mm (Section) Downward wind load, WL downward = 60/1000*.1*13*7.6= 1.48 kn Eccentric moment, M e,downward = 1.48*1.935/= 1.07 knm 1.0DL * WL downward = 1.4*M e,downward = 16.6 kn knm

50 Axial deisgn P fd = 16.6 kn f a = P fd / A /n= *1000//= 4.51 N/mm slendereness ratio, = L/r 750/58= <180 From table of HK005, reduced axial stress, pa = 195 N/mm > 4.51 N/mm Bending design M f = knm f b = M f / Z /n= *10^6/76500/ = N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld Design Weld length provided, L w = *10+*80+4*10= 660 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = *10*80^+*1/1*80^3+4*1/1*10^3+4*80*40^= mm 3 w w Weld Elastic modulus, Z = /(00)= mm Factored Axial compression, P f = Factored moment, M f = 16.6 kn knm Axial Weld stress, f aw = P f / L w /n = *1000/660 /= 1.57 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M f / Z w /n = *10^6/13013/ = N/mm For conservative design, 1/ Combined weld stress, f ew = (f bw +f aw ) = (649.7^ ^)^0.5= 649 N/mm Provide 6 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*6= 94 N/mm > 649 N/mm Design of anchor bolt Plan Consider Case 1 and Case 5 for steel post, Factored Axial compression, P f = 3. kn (Case 5 control) Factored Shear, V f = Factored moment, Mf = 7.8 kn knm Anchor bolt design is performed by Hilti's computer program. Please refer next page. Provide 8 nos. HIT-RE500/HAS-E M16x15 bolt (Case 4 control) (Case 5 control)

51 Loading schedule (unfactored load) Item DL LL DL+LL Lateral wind Upward/downward wind Axial (kn) Axial (kn) Axial (kn) Shear (kn) Moment (knm) Axial (kn) Pergola 4 at Area H

52 9. Pergola 5 at Area H : Loading assessment and design 7

53 Design for Steel Pergola at Ma Hang Headland Park Calculation is provided following load transfer path from roof deck to steel post and anchor bolt/steel base plate. Largest span, Loaded area, wind topography factor and loading combination will be used for structural member design. Pergola : 4 Area : H Dead Load Slat Self Weight, q ds = Structural Steel Sefl weight, q dst = 1197 kg/m 7850 kg/m 3 3 Wind Load Basic wind pressure, q z = (H < 5m) 1.8 kpa Wind pressure coefficient, C p = Topography factor for Area A, S a = 1.8 Design wind pressure, q w =1.15*S a *C p *q z = (Additional 15% wind load is adopted for design) 7.6 kpa Live Load Maintenance Live load on roof deck, q l = 0.75 kpa Design for 60 (B) mm x 90 mm (D) Slat, Recycled Plastic Wood Design This Slat Plan From First Principle, 4 I sx = 1/1*60*90^3= mm Z sx = I sx / (D/) = /(90/)= mm A s = B*D = 60*90= 5400 mm 3

54 Maximum span, L = Load width for wind load, b w = Load width for live load, b l =90+60 = 1759 mm 60 mm 150 mm Dead Load self weight of slat, w ds = 1197*9.81/1000*60/1000*90/1000= kn/m Live load Maintenance live load, w ls = 0.75*150/1000= 0.11 kn/m Wind load Downward wind load, w ws = 7.6*60/1000= 0.46 kn/m Case 1 : 1.4 DL LL Factored UDL on slat, w f1 = 1.4*w ds +1.6*w ls = 0.6 kn/m Case : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f = 1.*w ds +1.*w ls +1.*w ws = 0.76 kn/m (Controlled case) Case 3 : 1.4 DL + 1.4WL (download) Factored UDL on slat, w f3 = 1.4*w ds +1.4*w ws = Use maximum factored UDL for Design, w fd = 0.73 kn/m 0.76 kn/m Bending design M f = 1/8*0.76*(1759/1000)^= 0.9 knm f b = M f / Z s = 0.9*10^6/81000= 3.58 N/mm < 11.9 N/mm Shear Design V f = 1/*0.6*1759/1000= 0.3 kn f = V / A = 0.3*1000/5400= N/mm < 0.6*11.9 v f s = 7.14 N/mm Connection design between 60x90mm slat and 80x50x4mm steel plate Design this steel plate connection Section Design this steel plate connection Section

55 Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Bolt design M10 Grade 8.8 Bolt, A b = No. of bolt, n = 58 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn Bolt Shear stress, f vb = V f / (n*a b ) = 3.6 N/mm < 375 N/mm 80 mm (D) x 50 mm (B) x 4 mm steel plate Moment of inertia, I 1/1*4*80^3= mm 4 Elastic modulus, Z = /(80/)= 467 mm 3 Shear Area, A = 80*4= 30 mm v Factored Shear from slat, V f = 0.4 kn No. of plate provided per slat, n = Plate shear stress, f vp = V f / A v / n = 0.66 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Eccentricity, e = Factored eccentric moment, M e = V f *e = 0.4*5/1000= 5 mm 0.01 knm Plate bending stress, f bp = M e / Z / n = 0.01*10^6//467= 1.17 N/mm < 0 N/mm Weld design for 80x50x4mm steel plate and 160x80x17.5kg/m GMS RHS Weld length provided, L w = 80*= 160 mm Weld Moment of inertia, I = 1/1*80^3= 4667 mm 3 w Weld Elastic modulus, Zw = 4667/(80/)= 1067 mm Factored Shear from slat, V f = Factored Eccentric moment, M e = 0.4 kn 0.01 knm Shear Weld stress, f vw = V f / L w = 0.4*1000/160=.63 N/mm Bending weld stress, f bw = M e / Z w = 0.01*10^6/1067= 9.37 N/mm Combined weld stress, f ew = (f bw^+f vw^)^1/ = 9.73 N/mm Provide 4 mm fillet weld Provided weld strength, p w = 0.7*0*4= 616 N/mm > 9.73 N/mm

56 Design for 160x80x17.5kg/m GMS RHS supporting slat Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this RHS Section Plan Design 160x80x17.5kg/m RHS as cantilever beam 160x80x17.5kg/m GMS RHS I = Z = A = mm mm mm Length of RHS = 100 mm No. of Point load from slat, n = 14 Factored Self weight of RHS = 1.*.6*9.81/1000= 0.7 kn/m Equivalent Factored UDL on RHS, w = 0.4**14/(100/1000)= 5.6 kn/m 5.87 kn/m Cantilever span, L = 1764 mm Factored moment, M f = 1/*5.87*(1764/1000)^= 9.13 knm Factored Shear, V f = 5.87*1764/1000= kn Bending design f b = M f / Z = 9.13*10^6/76500= N/mm < 0 N/mm Shear design f v = V f / A v = 10.35*1000/1840= 5.63 N/mm < 0.6*0 N/mm = 13 N/mm Deflection design UDL on RHS, wu = 5.6/1.= 4.67 kn/m E = N/mm d = wl^4 / 8EI = 9.05 mm < L / 180 = mm

57 Design of Bolt joint at 160x80x17.5kg/m vertical RHS post supporting RHS cantilever beam Load combination : 1. DL + 1.LL + 1.WL (download) control and is used for design Design this bolt joint Loaded Unloaded Section Section Consider only larger projection is loaded and small projection unload for worst case design. Bolt design Area per bolt, A b = No. of bolt provided, n = mm For the bolt group, I xx = I yy = I p = I xx + I yy = mm mm 0000 mm Factored Direct Shear for bolt group, V f = Factored Moment for bolt group, M f = kn 9.13 knm Distance of bolt group centroid to one bol ( ) 1/ = 71 mm Factored shear from bending, V fb = 9.13*10^6*71/0000/1000= 3.41 kn For conservative design Factored design shear for bolt, V fd = V fb + V f = = 4.76 kn Bolt shear stress, f vb = V fd / A b = 4.76*1000/157= 7.36 N/mm < 375 N/mm

58 Design of 160x80x17.5kg/m RHS Vertical post Design this steel post Each 160x80x14.4kg/m RHS Vertical Post I = mm 4 Z = mm 3 A = 1840 mm r = 58 mm Effective Height of RHS post, H = No of post provided, n = 750 mm Case 1 : 1.4DL+1.6LL Load widith per RHS post bay, b = Load length per RHS post bay, L = Load area per RHS post, A = 1.758*.1= No. of slat at roof deck, n = Height of RHS post, H = Dead load: self weight of slat = self weight of 00x100x.6kg/m RHS = Self weight of 160x80x14.4kg/m SHS = m.1 m 3.69 m 8.75 m 0.063*1.758*8=.6*9.81/1000*.1= 14.4*9.81/1000*.75*= 1.55 kn 0.47 kn 0.78 kn.8 kn Live load : Maintenance live load = 0.75*3.69=.77 kn DL eccentric moment, M de = (1.33/3*.8*1.33/-0.441/3*.8*0.441/)= 0.73 knm LL eccentric moment, M le = (1.33/3*.77*1.33/-0.441/3*.77*0.441/)= 0.7 knm w = 1.4DL LL = 8.35 kn

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar Problem 1 Design a hand operated overhead crane, which is provided in a shed, whose details are: Capacity of crane = 50 kn Longitudinal spacing of column = 6m Center to center distance of gantry girder

More information

APOLLO SALES LTD SITE SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

APOLLO SALES LTD SITE SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS Alan White Design APOLLO SALES LTD SITE SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS Alan N White B.Sc., M.Eng., C.Eng., M.I.C.E., M.I.H.T. Feb 2014 Somerset House 11 Somerset Place GLASGOW G3 7JT Tel:0141

More information

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab, DESIGN OF SLABS Dr. G. P. Chandradhara Professor of Civil Engineering S. J. College of Engineering Mysore 1. GENERAL A slab is a flat two dimensional planar structural element having thickness small compared

More information

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps a brief guide on element design to EC3 Tim McCarthy Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk Slides available on the web http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/

More information

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P This material is duplicated in the Mechanical Principles module H2 and those

More information

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following. MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTOIAL 1 STESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING This is the first tutorial on bending of beams designed for anyone wishing to study it at a fairly advanced level. You should judge

More information

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS This is the second tutorial on bending of beams. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises.

More information

Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics)

Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics) Chapter 5 Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics) 5.1 Introduction Beam : loads acting transversely to the longitudinal axis the loads create shear forces and bending moments, stresses and strains due to V and

More information

Page 1 of 18 28.4.2008 Sven Alexander Last revised 1.3.2010. SB-Produksjon STATICAL CALCULATIONS FOR BCC 250

Page 1 of 18 28.4.2008 Sven Alexander Last revised 1.3.2010. SB-Produksjon STATICAL CALCULATIONS FOR BCC 250 Page 1 of 18 CONTENT PART 1 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS PAGE 1.1 General 1. Standards 1.3 Loads 1. Qualities PART ANCHORAGE OF THE UNITS.1 Beam unit equilibrium 3. Beam unit anchorage in front..1 Check of capacity..

More information

5 Steel elements. 5.1 Structural design At present there are two British Standards devoted to the design of strucof tural steel elements:

5 Steel elements. 5.1 Structural design At present there are two British Standards devoted to the design of strucof tural steel elements: 5 Steel elements 5.1 Structural design At present there are two British Standards devoted to the design of strucof steelwork tural steel elements: BS 449 The use of structural steel in building. BS 5950

More information

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia DESIGN OF SLABS Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Introduction Types of Slab Slabs are plate elements

More information

Aluminium systems profile selection

Aluminium systems profile selection Aluminium systems profile selection The purpose of this document is to summarise the way that aluminium profile selection should be made, based on the strength requirements for each application. Curtain

More information

New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design

New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design Part 1: 3D model based analysis using general beam-column FEM Ferenc Papp* and József Szalai ** * Associate Professor, Department of Structural

More information

Optimising plate girder design

Optimising plate girder design Optimising plate girder design NSCC29 R. Abspoel 1 1 Division of structural engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands ABSTRACT: In the design of steel plate girders a high degree

More information

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow. 9.2 One-way Slabs This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis and Design 9.2.1 Introduction Slabs are an important structural component where prestressing is applied. With increase

More information

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -) Cause: external force P Force vs. Stress Effect: internal stress f 05 Force vs. Stress Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-05 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Type of Force 1 Axial (tension /

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges 7.7 Truss bridges Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges Truss Girders, lattice girders or open web girders are efficient and economical structural systems, since the members experience

More information

2011-2012. Crane Runway Girder. Dr. Ibrahim Fahdah Damascus University. https://sites.google.com/site/ifahdah/home/lectures

2011-2012. Crane Runway Girder. Dr. Ibrahim Fahdah Damascus University. https://sites.google.com/site/ifahdah/home/lectures Crane Runway Girder Dr. Ibrahim Fahdah Damascus University https://sites.google.com/site/ifahdah/home/lectures Components of Crane system The Crane Runway Girder and the Structure Issue1: Vertical Load

More information

APPENDIX C Slab Calculation 2

APPENDIX C Slab Calculation 2 APPENDIX C Slab Calculation 2 Now try calculating the same slab, with the minimum recommended balanced load of 50% of self-weight. (As opposed to 50% of DL LL used in the first calculation). The same thickness

More information

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS Topics 17.1 INTRODUCTION Rectangular Combined Footing: Trapezoidal Combined Footings: Cantilever Footing: Mat foundation: 17.2 COMMON TYPES OF MAT FOUNDATIONS

More information

Full-Scale Load Testing of Steel Strutting System. For. Yongnam Holding Limited

Full-Scale Load Testing of Steel Strutting System. For. Yongnam Holding Limited Report on Full-Scale Load Testing of Steel Strutting System For Yongnam Holding Limited Prepared by Dr Richard Liew PhD, MIStrutE, CEng, PE(S pore) Department of Civil Engineering National University of

More information

Introduction to Beam. Area Moments of Inertia, Deflection, and Volumes of Beams

Introduction to Beam. Area Moments of Inertia, Deflection, and Volumes of Beams Introduction to Beam Theory Area Moments of Inertia, Deflection, and Volumes of Beams Horizontal structural member used to support horizontal loads such as floors, roofs, and decks. Types of beam loads

More information

INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES

INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES 4 INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES 1.0 INTRODUCTION A Civil Engineering Designer has to ensure that the structures and facilities he designs are (i) fit for their purpose (ii) safe and (iii) economical and

More information

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 14-1 Load Path and Transfer to

More information

9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I)

9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I) 9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I) This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis and Design Features in Modeling and Analysis Distribution of Moments to Strips 9.3.1 Introduction The slabs are

More information

Problem 1: Computation of Reactions. Problem 2: Computation of Reactions. Problem 3: Computation of Reactions

Problem 1: Computation of Reactions. Problem 2: Computation of Reactions. Problem 3: Computation of Reactions Problem 1: Computation of Reactions Problem 2: Computation of Reactions Problem 3: Computation of Reactions Problem 4: Computation of forces and moments Problem 5: Bending Moment and Shear force Problem

More information

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

16. Beam-and-Slab Design ENDP311 Structural Concrete Design 16. Beam-and-Slab Design Beam-and-Slab System How does the slab work? L- beams and T- beams Holding beam and slab together University of Western Australia School of Civil

More information

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated. Design Step 4 Design Step 4.1 DECK SLAB DESIGN In addition to designing the deck for dead and live loads at the strength limit state, the AASHTO-LRFD specifications require checking the deck for vehicular

More information

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Guidance to developers of software for the design of composite beams

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Guidance to developers of software for the design of composite beams STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Guidance to developers of software for the design of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Guidance to developers of software for the design

More information

SIGN STRUCTURES GUIDE SUPPORT DESIGN FOR UK TRAFFIC SIGNS

SIGN STRUCTURES GUIDE SUPPORT DESIGN FOR UK TRAFFIC SIGNS SIGN STRUCTURES GUIDE SUPPORT DESIGN FOR UK TRAFFIC SIGNS Fully revised to BS EN 12899-1:2007 May 2008 Published by the Institute of Highway Incorporated Engineers De Morgan House 58 Russell Square London

More information

Rigid and Braced Frames

Rigid and Braced Frames Rigid Frames Rigid and raced Frames Rigid frames are identified b the lack of pinned joints within the frame. The joints are rigid and resist rotation. The ma be supported b pins or fied supports. The

More information

Deflections. Question: What are Structural Deflections?

Deflections. Question: What are Structural Deflections? Question: What are Structural Deflections? Answer: The deformations or movements of a structure and its components, such as beams and trusses, from their original positions. It is as important for the

More information

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design Presented by: Ronald Thornton, P.E. Define several terms related to reinforced concrete design Learn the basic theory behind structural analysis and reinforced concrete

More information

Product Catalogue HW-B150H

Product Catalogue HW-B150H Product Catalogue Content 1 Coverage and Terminology... 4 1.1 Design Standards... 4 1.2 Load Criteria... 5 1.3 Definition of Terms... 6 1.3.1 Flood Barrier... 6 1.3.2 Flood Height, effective Flood Height,

More information

Lecture 8 Bending & Shear Stresses on Beams

Lecture 8 Bending & Shear Stresses on Beams Lecture 8 Bending & hear tresses on Beams Beams are almost always designed on the asis of ending stress and, to a lesser degree, shear stress. Each of these stresses will e discussed in detail as follows.

More information

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993 Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993 Abstract: This Technical Notes is a design aid for the Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures (ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402-92) and Specifications

More information

Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures

Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures David Brown, Associate Director, Steel Construction Institute Introduction Structural engineers should be encouraged that at least in steel, design conforming to

More information

Foreword. This manual provides technical information for designers and contractors to design and plan the construction operation.

Foreword. This manual provides technical information for designers and contractors to design and plan the construction operation. Foreword Foreword This manual provides technical information for designers and contractors to design and plan the construction operation. The body of the manual is split into eight distinct sections: 1.

More information

Comparative Study of Steel Structures Design Using IS 800:1984 & IS 800:2007

Comparative Study of Steel Structures Design Using IS 800:1984 & IS 800:2007 International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 4, April-2013 810 Comparative Study of Steel Structures Design Using IS 800:1984 & IS 800:2007 Prof. S.S.Patil, L.A.Pasnur Abstract

More information

Design guide. Part 1: Structural Design

Design guide. Part 1: Structural Design Design guide Part 1: Structural Design Design guide Part 1: Structural Design Advantages: Fast Economical Strong Insulating Environmentally friendly Versatile Modernist house supplied by SIPBuild Vernacular

More information

Design Manual to BS8110

Design Manual to BS8110 Design Manual to BS8110 February 2010 195 195 195 280 280 195 195 195 195 195 195 280 280 195 195 195 The specialist team at LinkStudPSR Limited have created this comprehensive Design Manual, to assist

More information

Structural Analysis. EUROCODE 2 Background and Applications

Structural Analysis. EUROCODE 2 Background and Applications Dissemination of information for training Brussels, 20-21 October 2011 1 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Manfred Curbach TU Dresden, Institute for Concrete Structures M.Sc. Martin Just TU Dresden, Institute for Concrete

More information

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN CHAPTER Structural Steel Design LRFD Method Third Edition SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Part II Structural

More information

Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures

Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures Dr Stephen Hicks, Manager Structural Systems, Heavy Engineering Research Association, New Zealand Introduction BS EN 1994 (Eurocode 4) is the

More information

Simplified Design to BS 5400

Simplified Design to BS 5400 Simplified Design to BS 5400 Bridge Design to the Eurocodes Simplified rules for use in student projects (Document RT1156) Version Date of Issue Purpose Author Technical Reviewer Approved 1 Distribution

More information

5 G R A TINGS ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL. MBG Metal Bar Grating METAL BAR GRATING MANUAL MBG 534-12 METAL BAR GRATING NAAMM

5 G R A TINGS ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL. MBG Metal Bar Grating METAL BAR GRATING MANUAL MBG 534-12 METAL BAR GRATING NAAMM METAL BAR NAAMM GRATNG MANUAL MBG 534-12 5 G R A TNG NAAMM MBG 534-12 November 4, 2012 METAL BAR GRATNG ENGNEERNG DEGN MANUAL NAAMM MBG 534-12 November 4, 2012 5 G R A TNG MBG Metal Bar Grating A Division

More information

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS American National Standard SJI-K 1.1 STANDARD FOR OPEN WEB STEEL JOISTS, K-SERIES SECTION 1. SCOPE Adopted by the Steel Joist Institute November 4, 1985 Revised to November 10, 2003 - Effective March 01,

More information

HOPLEYS OPENWEBSTEELJOISTS

HOPLEYS OPENWEBSTEELJOISTS Design Aid Manual Now also includes Letter of Certification & Bearer Span Table HOPLEYS OPENWEBSTEELJOISTS 2...has over 60 years experience and a respected reputation in Sheet Metal fabrication and associated

More information

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS CHAPTER Structural Steel Design LRFD Method INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS Third Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Part II Structural Steel Design and Analysis

More information

DS/EN 1993-1-1 DK NA:2014

DS/EN 1993-1-1 DK NA:2014 National Annex to Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings Foreword This national annex (NA) is a revision of DS/EN 1993-1-1 DK NA:2013 and replaces the

More information

International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL

International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL PROJECT International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL EXP. 11/30/2014 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS July 24, 2014 BOWMAN, BARRETT & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 312.228.0100

More information

TRUSSES. (b) Space Truss. Bracings. (e) Truss Bridge. (d) Bracings in Single Storey Buildings. (c) Bracings in Multi-storey Building

TRUSSES. (b) Space Truss. Bracings. (e) Truss Bridge. (d) Bracings in Single Storey Buildings. (c) Bracings in Multi-storey Building 27 TRUSSES 1.0 INTRODUCTION Trusses are triangular frame works in which the members are subjected to essentially axial forces due to externally applied load. They may be plane trusses [Fig. 1(a)], wherein

More information

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB), 34 (1) (26) 1-14 Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge Tanvir Manzur and Alamgir Habib Department of Civil Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering

More information

8.2 Elastic Strain Energy

8.2 Elastic Strain Energy Section 8. 8. Elastic Strain Energy The strain energy stored in an elastic material upon deformation is calculated below for a number of different geometries and loading conditions. These expressions for

More information

Thermal Stress & Strain. 07 Thermal Stress and Strain Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-05 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 3

Thermal Stress & Strain. 07 Thermal Stress and Strain Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-05 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 3 Thermal Stress & Strain 07 Thermal Stress and Strain Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-05 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 3 Thermal Stress & Strain 07 Thermal Stress and Strain Copyright G G

More information

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column Design of reinforced concrete columns Type of columns Failure of reinforced concrete columns Short column Column fails in concrete crushed and bursting. Outward pressure break horizontal ties and bend

More information

Canadian Standards Association

Canadian Standards Association S6S1-10 10.10.2.2 Laterally supported members When continuous lateral support is provided to the compression flange of a member subjected to bending about its major axis, the factored moment resistance,

More information

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures Chapter 8 Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures 8.1 Scope Provisions of Sec. 8.1 and 8.2 of Chapter 8 shall apply for detailing of reinforcement in reinforced concrete members, in general. For

More information

Schöck Isokorb type KST User Selection Guide. Schöck Isokorb type KST Blindtext

Schöck Isokorb type KST User Selection Guide. Schöck Isokorb type KST Blindtext Blindtext Schöck Isokorb type KST User Selection Guide Schöck Ltd 2-4 High Street Kidlington, Oxfordshire OX5 2DH Tel: 01865 290 890 Fax: 01865 290 899 E-mail: design@schoeck.co.uk Web: www.schoeck.co.uk

More information

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM Ninth LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference (LACCEI 11), Engineering for a Smart Planet, Innovation, Information Technology and Computational Tools for Sustainable Development, August 3-, 11,

More information

MODULE E: BEAM-COLUMNS

MODULE E: BEAM-COLUMNS MODULE E: BEAM-COLUMNS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects P-M interaction formulas Moment amplification Web local buckling Braced and unbraced frames Members in braced frames Members

More information

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING HAPTER Reinforced oncrete Design Fifth Edition MATERIALS AND MEHANIS OF BENDING A. J. lark School of Engineering Department of ivil and Environmental Engineering Part I oncrete Design and Analysis b FALL

More information

Numerical modelling of shear connection between concrete slab and sheeting deck

Numerical modelling of shear connection between concrete slab and sheeting deck 7th fib International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering 2008 September 10-13, Universität Stuttgart, Germany Numerical modelling of shear connection between concrete slab and sheeting deck Noémi Seres

More information

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: TREY HAMILTON, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design,

More information

III. Compression Members. Design of Steel Structures. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

III. Compression Members. Design of Steel Structures. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.) ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University it of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

UNRESTRAINED BEAM DESIGN I

UNRESTRAINED BEAM DESIGN I 11 UNRESTRAINED BEA DESIGN I 1.0 INTRODUCTION Generally, a beam resists transverse loads by bending action. In a typical building frame, main beams are employed to span between adjacent columns; secondary

More information

Design Of Reinforced Concrete Structures ii Two-Way Slabs

Design Of Reinforced Concrete Structures ii Two-Way Slabs 1. Inroduction When the ratio (L/S) is less than 2.0, slab is called two-way slab, as shown in the fig. below. Bending will take place in the two directions in a dish-like form. Accordingly, main reinforcement

More information

Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures

Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures Buildings Department Practice Note for Authorized Persons, Registered Structural Engineers and Registered Geotechnical Engineers APP-68 Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures

More information

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design, it is preferable to draw moment diagrams

More information

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4 - COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4 - COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4 - COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS This the fourth and final tutorial on bending of beams. You should judge our progress b completing the self assessment exercises.

More information

HØGSKOLEN I GJØVIK Avdeling for teknologi, økonomi og ledelse. Løsningsforslag for kontinuasjonseksamen i Mekanikk 4/1-10

HØGSKOLEN I GJØVIK Avdeling for teknologi, økonomi og ledelse. Løsningsforslag for kontinuasjonseksamen i Mekanikk 4/1-10 Løsningsforslag for kontinuasjonseksamen i 4/1-10 Oppgave 1 (T betyr tension, dvs. strekk, og C betyr compression, dvs. trykk.) Side 1 av 9 Leif Erik Storm Oppgave 2 Løsning (fra http://www.public.iastate.edu/~statics/examples/vmdiags/vmdiaga.html

More information

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building Andrew Bartolini December 7, 2012 Designer 1 Partner: Shannon Warchol CE 40270: Reinforced Concrete Design Bartolini 2 Table of Contents Abstract...3

More information

Formwork for Concrete

Formwork for Concrete UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CM 420 TEMPORARY STRUCTURES Winter Quarter 2007 Professor Kamran M. Nemati Formwork for Concrete Horizontal Formwork Design and Formwork Design

More information

HUS-V Screw anchor. HUS-V Screw anchor. Basic loading data (for a single anchor) Mean ultimate resistance

HUS-V Screw anchor. HUS-V Screw anchor. Basic loading data (for a single anchor) Mean ultimate resistance HUS-V Screw anchor Anchor version HUS-V 8 / 10 Carbon steel concrete screw with hexagonal head Benefits - High productivity less drilling and fewer operations than with conventional anchors - Technical

More information

Joist. Reinforcement. Draft 12/7/02

Joist. Reinforcement. Draft 12/7/02 Joist Reinforcement Draft 12/7/02 1 JOIST REINFORCING The purpose of this CSD Design Aid is to provide procedures and suggested details for the reinforcement of open web steel joists. There are three basic

More information

REVIEW PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS JAMES M. GERE BARRY J. GOODNO

REVIEW PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS JAMES M. GERE BARRY J. GOODNO REVIEW ROEMS & SOUTIONS JMES M. GERE RRY J. GOODNO ppendix FE Exam Review roblems R-1.1: plane truss has downward applied load at joint and another load applied leftward at joint 5. The force in member

More information

MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab. Chapter 9: Force, Torque and Strain Measurements

MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab. Chapter 9: Force, Torque and Strain Measurements MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab Chapter 9: Force, Torque and Strain Measurements Topics: Elastic Elements for Force Measurement Dynamometers and Brakes Resistance Strain Gages Holman, Ch.

More information

Concrete Design to Eurocode 2

Concrete Design to Eurocode 2 Concrete Design to Eurocode 2 Jenny Burridge MA CEng MICE MIStructE Head of Structural Engineering Introduction to the Eurocodes Eurocode Eurocode 1 Eurocode 2 Materials Cover Flexure Shear Deflection

More information

4B-2. 2. The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

4B-2. 2. The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections. Shear Walls Buildings that use shear walls as the lateral force-resisting system can be designed to provide a safe, serviceable, and economical solution for wind and earthquake resistance. Shear walls

More information

Structural Design Criteria & Design Loads on Delhi Metro Rail and Checking of Safety of Radial Joints in Tunnel Lining Segments

Structural Design Criteria & Design Loads on Delhi Metro Rail and Checking of Safety of Radial Joints in Tunnel Lining Segments International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 7, July 2015 1 Structural Design Criteria & Design Loads on Delhi Metro Rail and Checking of Safety of Radial Joints in Tunnel

More information

Shear Forces and Bending Moments

Shear Forces and Bending Moments Chapter 4 Shear Forces and Bending Moments 4.1 Introduction Consider a beam subjected to transverse loads as shown in figure, the deflections occur in the plane same as the loading plane, is called the

More information

Built-up roofing solutions with rigid insulation boards on concrete decks for new-build and refurbishment E-a5

Built-up roofing solutions with rigid insulation boards on concrete decks for new-build and refurbishment E-a5 Cl Sfb (27-9) Rn7 M2 December 2004 Built-up roofing solutions with rigid insulation boards on concrete decks for new-build and refurbishment E-a5 Fesco, Fesco S, Retrofit, Retrofit S, Fesco Fillet, PF,

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. The design of any foundation consists of following two parts.

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. The design of any foundation consists of following two parts. 8.7. Design procedure for foundation The design of any foundation consists of following two parts. 8.7.1 Stability analysis Stability analysis aims at removing the possibility of failure of foundation

More information

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures SECTION 70 - GENERAL "APPENDIX CHAPTER 7 - EARTHEN MATERIAL STRUCTURES 70. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum standards of safety

More information

Finite Element Formulation for Beams - Handout 2 -

Finite Element Formulation for Beams - Handout 2 - Finite Element Formulation for Beams - Handout 2 - Dr Fehmi Cirak (fc286@) Completed Version Review of Euler-Bernoulli Beam Physical beam model midline Beam domain in three-dimensions Midline, also called

More information

F. P. Beer et al., Meccanica dei solidi, Elementi di scienza delle costruzioni, 5e - isbn 9788838668579, 2014 McGraw-Hill Education (Italy) srl

F. P. Beer et al., Meccanica dei solidi, Elementi di scienza delle costruzioni, 5e - isbn 9788838668579, 2014 McGraw-Hill Education (Italy) srl F. P. Beer et al., eccanica dei solidi, Elementi di scienza delle costruzioni, 5e - isbn 9788888579, 04 cgraw-hill Education (Italy) srl Reactions: Σ = 0: bp = 0 = Pb Σ = 0: ap = 0 = Pa From to B: 0

More information

Preliminary steel concrete composite bridge design charts for Eurocodes

Preliminary steel concrete composite bridge design charts for Eurocodes Preliminary steel concrete composite bridge 90 Rachel Jones Senior Engineer Highways & Transportation Atkins David A Smith Regional Head of Bridge Engineering Highways & Transportation Atkins Abstract

More information

Alternative Steel Materials to BS 5950

Alternative Steel Materials to BS 5950 BC 1: 2008 Design Guide on Use of Alternative Steel Materials to BS 5950 BCA Sustainable Construction Series 3 The education and research arm of the Building and Construction Authority 200 Braddell Road

More information

Light Steel Framing (LSF) Product Information

Light Steel Framing (LSF) Product Information Light Steel Framing (LSF) Product Information tel + (0) 8 8 fax + (0) 8 09 email enquiries@drywallsteelsections.co.uk web www.drywallsteelsections.co.uk tel + (0) 8 8 fax + (0) 8 09 p. Drywall Steel Sections

More information

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES OUTCOME 2 ENGINEERING COMPONENTS TUTORIAL 1 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES OUTCOME 2 ENGINEERING COMPONENTS TUTORIAL 1 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS ENGINEERING COMPONENTS EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES OUTCOME ENGINEERING COMPONENTS TUTORIAL 1 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS Structural members: struts and ties; direct stress and strain,

More information

Timber Frame Construction

Timber Frame Construction Timber Frame Construction Introduction Design and Detailing What is timber? Failure modes History of timber frame construction Forms of timber frame construction Live and dead loads Wind loads Roof construction

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Roof Decks 172 B, BA, BV Deck N, NA Deck. Form Decks 174.6 FD,.6 FDV Deck 1.0 FD, 1.0 FDV Deck 1.5 FD Deck 2.0 FD Deck 3.

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Roof Decks 172 B, BA, BV Deck N, NA Deck. Form Decks 174.6 FD,.6 FDV Deck 1.0 FD, 1.0 FDV Deck 1.5 FD Deck 2.0 FD Deck 3. Pages identified with the NMBS Logo as shown above, have been produced by NMBS to assist specifiers and consumers in the application of New Millennium Building Systems Deck products. Pages identified with

More information

Concrete Frame Design Manual

Concrete Frame Design Manual Concrete Frame Design Manual Turkish TS 500-2000 with Turkish Seismic Code 2007 For SAP2000 ISO SAP093011M26 Rev. 0 Version 15 Berkeley, California, USA October 2011 COPYRIGHT Copyright Computers and Structures,

More information

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs Page 1 of 9 Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs 12 h A 12 strip in a simply supported one-way slab h b=12 L Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

More information

Design rules for bridges in Eurocode 3

Design rules for bridges in Eurocode 3 Design rules for bridges in Eurocode 3 Gerhard Sedlacek Christian üller Survey of the Eurocodes EN 1991 EN 1990 Eurocode: Basis of Design EN 1992 to EN 1996 Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures Eurocode 2:

More information

EFFECTIVE BENDING CAPACITY OF DOWEL-TYPE FASTENERS

EFFECTIVE BENDING CAPACITY OF DOWEL-TYPE FASTENERS EFFECTIVE BENDING CAPACITY OF DOWEL-TYPE FASTENERS Hans Joachim Blass 1), Adriane Bienhaus 1) and Volker Krämer 1) 1) Lehrstuhl für Ingenieurholzbau und Baukonstruktionen, University of Karlsruhe, Germany

More information

The following excerpt are pages from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 2: Anchor Fastening, Edition 16.

The following excerpt are pages from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 2: Anchor Fastening, Edition 16. The following excerpt are pages from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 2: Anchor Fastening, Edition 16. Please refer to the publication in its entirety for complete details on this product

More information

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China Advanced Materials Research Vols. 163-167 (2011) pp 1147-1156 Online available since 2010/Dec/06 at www.scientific.net (2011) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.163-167.1147

More information

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION

TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATION NO: 9 DESIGN OF LIGHT TIMBER FRAMED WALLS AND FLOORS FOR FIRE RESISTANCE Peter Collier Contents Design of Light Timber Framed Walls and Floors for Fire Resistance Relevance Acceptance

More information

Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures

Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures Every successful structure must be capable of reaching stable equilibrium under its applied loads, regardless of structural behavior. Exact analysis

More information