Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building


 Frederick Burns
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building Andrew Bartolini December 7, 2012 Designer 1 Partner: Shannon Warchol CE 40270: Reinforced Concrete Design
2 Bartolini 2 Table of Contents Abstract...3 Introduction...4 Design...5 i. Slab Thickness...6 ii. Loads...6 iii. Estimation of Column Sizes...6 iv. Slab Design...7 v. Tbeam Design for Flexure...10 vi. Tbeam Design for Shear...14 viii. Crack Control...16 ix. Tbeam deflection control...17 x. Column Design...18 Summary and Conclusion...21 Recommendations...22 Appendix A: Design Figures...24 B: Load Estimate Calculations...39 C: Slab Design Calculations...40 D: TBeam Flexure Calculations...42 E: TBeam Shear Calculations...48 F: Crack Control Calculations...54 G: Deflection Calculations...56 H: Column Design Calculations...68
3 Bartolini 3 Abstract This report outlines the structural design of a fivestory reinforced concrete office building following ACI The framing arrangement and column locations of the building were provided based on architectural and structural requirements. The structure system of the office building is a reinforced concrete frame with a oneway slab and beam floor system. This report covers the design process in the following order: the calculation of the expected loads on the structure, the design of the slab depth, the estimation of the column sizes, the design of the slab reinforcement, the design of the Tbeam reinforcement for both flexural and shear, the calculation to check crack control, the calculation to check Tbeam deflections and finally the design of the column reinforcement. Additionally, figures displaying the placement of the steel rebar in the structure are contained in the report. The details of the design can be found within the report. The basic design of the office building includes seven (7) inch slabs throughout, fifteen (15) inch by fifteen (15) inch square columns and Tbeam depths of eighteen (18) inches for the exterior column spans and twenty (20) inches for the interior column spans. Due to deflection control issues that arose in this preliminary design, some of the interior beam lines have to be redesigned in further iterations of this design. The maximum depth of the interior Tbeams would be twentytwo (22 inches). The reinforcement is varied throughout the project depending on necessary loads and ACI The slab reinforcement spacing would also have to be edited in future designs because it did not comply with ACI 318 crack control limits. All beams were designed to be underreinforced beams in order to provide extensive warning before failure (should it ever occur) and all beams were design for shear in order to avoid a sudden and catastrophic failure. Finally, the column reinforcement was designed under two different loading conditions, the first of which maximized both the axial and moment in the column and the second which maximized the moment but minimized the axial loads for a maximum eccentricity. Three recommendations that I would make if I were redesigning this structure from the beginning would be to use deeper Tbeams initially so the building would not fail the deflection limits, use #3 bars for the slab reinforcement while limiting the spacing to twelve (12) inches and use smaller columns dimensions. I would still use at least two Tbeam depths, however, as the
4 Bartolini 4 exterior beam lines can be eighteen (18) inches deep while some interior beam lines may need to be twentytwo (22) inches deep. Introduction The framing plan of the fivestory reinforced concrete building was provided and can be seen in Figure 1. As shown in the framing plan, the building is six bays by three bays. The outer bays along the sixbay side are 14 feet centertocenter while the inner bays along the sixbay side are 16 feet centertocenter. The outer bays along the threebay side are 25 feet centertocenter while the inner bay along the threebay side is 30 feet centertocenter. The framing plan also denotes oneway slabs with Tbeams that run along the sixbay columns. Figure 1: Plan View of FiveStory Building The first story height of the building is 16 feet while all the other story heights are 12 feet. An elevation view of the office building can be found in Figure 2.
5 Bartolini 5 Figure 2: Elevation View This report will explain the preliminary design process for this fivestory reinforced concrete office building according to ACI It should be noted that this design is preliminary and would undergo a number of iterations. First the slab thickness was found followed by the calculation of loads on the structure. Next an estimation of the column sizes was calculated. The slab reinforcement was then designed followed by the flexure and shear reinforcement of the Tbeams. Subsequently the design was checked for crack control and deflection control. Finally, the column reinforcement was designed. This report will detail both the technical design procedure as well as a discussion into the reasons for each type of reinforcement and each step in the design process and why certain decisions were made in the design process. Finally, at the end of this report, there are recommendations on how to adapt the design when future iterations of this design are carried out or if someone was to start the design over from scratch. Design The design of the fivestory reinforced concrete structure entailed a number of steps and calculations. Each section listed below describes one step in the process of the design. Attached to the end of this report are sample hand calculations for each step in the design process.
6 Bartolini 6 Slab Thickness The slab thickness was determined to be seven (7) inches by using Table 9.5(a) in ACI 318. The exterior spans required seveninch slab thickness, which was slightly larger than the slab thickness requirement for the interior spans. For ease of construction and economical purposes, a slab thickness of seven inches was used throughout the entire building. Loads The loads were calculated using ASCE 7 and the load combinations in Table 1.2 of ACI 318. For the floors, the dead loads included the load from the mechanical equipment and the ceiling (15 psf) and the load from the slab (87.5 psf). The live load for the floors was 50 psf while the partition loading (which was also considered a live load) was 20 psf. The dead loads for the roof included the load from the mechanical equipment and the ceiling (15 psf), the load from the roofing material (7 psf) and load from the slab (87.5 psf). The live load for the roof was comprised of the snow load only (30 psf). The load for the slabs was calculated by multiplying the slab thickness by the unit weight of concrete (150 psf). The load combination from Table 1.2 of ACI 318 consisted of a load factor of 1.2 for the dead loads and 1.6 for the live loads. Using this load combination, the roof load was found to be psf and the floor load was found to be 235 psf. Table 1 and 2 in the Appendix B contain the breakdown of the load design along with the final loading values for both the roof and the floor. Estimation of the Column Size The first step in the process of determining the column size was the calculation of the tributary area of the most heavily loaded column, which in this building plan was a column in the interior section of the building, (i.e. C3), which resulted in a tributary area of 440 ft 2.
7 Bartolini 7 The loading of the roof and four floors was multiplied by this tributary area to determine the factored load experience by the ground story column. The area of the concrete needed to support the calculated force was then calculated, taking into account both the strength of the concrete and the steel. Appropriate overall strength reduction factors were included to not only provide a further factor of safety but also account for eccentric loading of the column. It was also assumed that 2% of the area of the column was steel. Using this assumption, the overall area of the column was 209 in 2. Using a square crosssection, the column width and depth were chosen to be fifteen (15) inches. It should be noted that this calculation was for preliminary design only and would be checked later in the design process. Slab Design The slabs were primarily designed with reinforcing steel parallel to the numerical grid lines. This is because the floor system is a oneway slab, which means that bending will occur between the two supporting beams in a parabolic shape, with the largest moments being at the top of the slab near the supports and at the bottom of the slabs at the midspans. Steel was also provided in the transverse direction to provide resistance to the temperature and shrinkage cracks in the tension regions. The first step in the slab design was to find the effective span length. For negative moments, the effective span length is taken as the average of the two adjacent clear spans while for positive moments the effective span length is the given slab s clear span. Next, the ACI moment coefficients were found for a spandrel slab with two or more spans. The spandrel slab was used because the majority of the slab acts as a spandrel (i.e. the slab was just supported by beams). Since the portion of the slab that was supported just by the beams is so much greater than the portion of the slab that is supported by the columns, the spandrel condition was used for the moment coefficient. Following ACI 318, the moments were found for the various critical cross sections along the slab.
8 Bartolini 8 Using the moments at the critical sections, the steel required was tabulated along with the minimum steel requirement according to ACI 318. The larger quantity of steel governed and a steel size and spacing combination was chosen. The extreme tension fiber depth was checked to verify that it remain nearly the same as was assumed earlier in the procedure. The strain in the extreme tension fiber was also checked for each critical section of the slab to verify that the strain was above in order to verify a previous assumption that the strength reduction factor (ϕ) was Two additional ACI 318 requirements were then checked. The first was that the maximum steel spacing could not exceed eighteen (18) inches or three (3) times the slab thickness (which is twentyone (21) inches). Additionally, a practical limit of the spacing being greater than one and a half (1.5) times the slab thickness (which is ten and a half (10.5) inches) was checked. Next, the design of the transverse steel reinforcing was completed. In the transverse direction of the main longitudinal steel, there is a minimum amount of steel required (which is the same as the minimum reinforcing that was referred to in the above calculations). This amount of steel was calculated and a combination of size and spacing of bars was chosen. The maximum spacing of eighteen (18) inches or five (5) times the slab thickness (which is thirtyfive (35) inches) was checked along with the same practical limit that was used above. The roof slab design consisted of #4 bars at 15 spacing in both the longitudinal and transverse (for temperature and shrinkage cracks) directions. The floor slab design consisted of #4 bars at 13 to 15 spacing for the longitudinal direction and #4 bars at 15 spacing in the transverse direction (for temperature and shrinkage cracks). Finally, following Figure 5.20(a) from Nilson et al, the simplified standard cut off points for the slab reinforcement were calculated. Sample design drawings of the floor slabs are shown in Figures 35. The full set of design drawings are shown in Figures A1A6 in the Appendix.
9 Bartolini 9 Figure 3: Floor Slab Design Figure 4: Plan of Floor Slab Design (Top Steel)
10 Bartolini 10 Figure 5: Plan of Floor Slab Design (Bottom and Temperature/Shrinkage Steel) The full, tabulated calculations for the floor slab can be found in Appendix C. Tbeam Design for Flexure The Tbeams were then designed for the flexural forces they would experience. This design comprised of the determination and selection of the adequate amount of steel necessary in each of the critical Tbeam sections. The steel reinforcement is necessary in the portions of the T beam that are in tension because steel is strong in tension while concrete is very weak and brittle in tension. However, the Tbeam sections cannot have too much steel or they become overreinforced and the failure mode of an overreinforcement beam is very sudden. The Tbeam should be underreinforced so there is warning before a failure would occur (under a loading condition that was not designed for).
11 Bartolini 11 There were six unique beam lines to analyze when designing the Tbeam for flexure. Beam lines A and G; B and F; and C, D and E are the three groups of identical beam lines and there was both the floor and roof loading cases for each set of beam lines. Along each beam line, there were five critical sections that correlated to the critical sections for the ACI Moment Coefficients. The Tbeam width was taken to be fifteen (15) inches to match the column widths in order to make construction easier. The first step in determining the Tbeam reinforcement was to calculate the governing Tbeam depth. Using ACI code, both the exterior and interior spans were checked and it was found that the interior Tbeam depth (17.14 inches) governed the exterior Tbeam depth (16.2 inches). Since these are a minimum value, a round value of eighteen (18) inches was used as the Tbeam depth. For beams with positive bending (tension is in the bottom of the Tbeam), it was assumed the rectangular stress block (which is correlated to the portion of the beam in compression), was fully comprised in the flange (i.e. slab). For beams with negative bending (tension is in the top of the Tbeam), the rectangular stress block was assumed to be in the stem (i.e. web). Both of these assumptions would be checked in the design process. Next, the effective width of the slab was calculated according to ACI The effective width of the slab is the portion of the Tbeam flange that contributes to the strength of the Tbeam. For interior beam lines the effective width of the slab cannot be greater than onequarter of the clear span length and the overhanging flange width must be less than eight times the slab thickness and must also be less than one half the adjacent clear span. For exterior spans, the overhanging flange width cannot exceed onetwelfth the span length of the beam, six times the slab thickness and onehalf the clear distance to the next web. After the effective width was calculated, the effective depth was then found. For the positive bending sections, the effective depth was the beam depth minus the two and a half (2.5) inches, which includes the cover distance (1.5 inches), the diameter of the stirrup bar (0.5 inches) and half of the longitudinal rebar diameter (which was assumed to be a #8 bar). For the negative section, the effective depth was the Tbeam depth minus the cover (0.75 inches), the transverse rebar (0.5 inches) and half of the longitudinal rebar diameter (which was assumed to be a #8 bar). The distributed load that the Tbeam supported was then found by multiplying the tributary
12 Bartolini 12 area of the Tbeam (half the centertocenter span to each side of the Tbeam) by either the floor or roof load. This value was added to the selfweight of the beam stem for the total line load. Then using the corresponding ACI moment coefficients, the moment for each section was found. Using the moment for the section along with the effective depth of the section, the width of the Tbeam and an assumed reduction factor (ϕ) of 0.90, the area of steel required in each section was found and a combination of bar sizes was selected. The effective depth was then check again using the same methodology (but using the actual value of half the diameter of the longitudinal steel) to make sure it was approximately the value that was assumed. The extreme tension strain and the reduction factor (ϕ) were then verified to be the same as the values that were assumed. The clear distance spacing of the bars was also checked using ACI 318. Finally, the minimum and maximum steel requirements were verified according to ACI and and the design strength of the Tbeam was checked. For beam lines C, D and E, the extreme tension stress and ϕ factor were not verified as they were assumed and the beams were not in compliance with the code. Therefore, for these beam lines the beam depth was increased to twenty (20) inches and the process was repeated. This beam depth resulted in a design that complied with the code. The reinforcement details (elevation and crosssections) for floor beam lines A and G can be seen in Figure 6. The elevation and crosssection reinforcement details for all the unique beam lines can be found in Figures A7 to A12 in the Appendix. The Tbeam flexural reinforcement calculations can be found in Appendix D. It should be noted that only one steel reinforcement design was used between S3 and S4. The section that requires the larger amount of steel will control the steel region at the first interior support.
13 Bartolini 13 Figure 6: Floor TBeam Reinforcing Elevation and Sections for Beam Lines A and G
14 Bartolini 14 Tbeam Design for Shear Next in the design process was the determination of the shear reinforcement. Without shear reinforcement the beam would have a catastrophic failure due to shearweb and flexureshear cracks. These cracks would form due to the shear forces in the beam and cause equivalent tension stresses that would cause failure in the beam since concrete is very weak in tension. This failure would be sudden and extremely dangerous and must be designed against. Additionally, this is incredibly important because this failure occurs substantially before the flexural strength of the beam is reached. Therefore stirrups at a determined spacing are used to provide a source of tensile strength against these shear forces (and equivalent tensile stresses). As was the case with the Tbeam flexural design, there are six unique beam lines that must be designed for shear. Additionally, like the Tbeam flexural design, beam lines A and G; B and F; and C, D and E compose three groups of identical beam lines and then there are the two loading conditions for each group (i.e. the floor and the roof loads). The shear forces at the critical locations were determined using the shear coefficients from ACI 318 with the same line load that was used in the flexural design (i.e. the tributary area of the T beam multiplied by the area load combined with the Tbeam stem selfweight). The effective depth was also calculated using the most conservative value from the positive moment sections in the flexural design. The shear diagram was then constructed by applying the shear coefficients from ACI 318. The shear at the columns was truncated at a distance d away from the support (so there is a constant shear away from the supports to a distance d away from the support at which the shear will connect back to the original shear diagram). The strength of the concrete in shear was then calculated with a factor of safety. The portions of the beam where the reduced strength of the concrete itself was greater than the factored shear force on the beam are required to have the minimum web reinforcement. A #4 stirrup was used and the required maximum spacing was determined to be seven and a half (7.5) inches. For the portion of the shear diagram that had a shear force above the concrete shear strength, the minimum spacing for strength purposes were tabulated. In all the sections, this value was above the maximum spacing limits that were the same as above (for the region where the reduced
15 Bartolini 15 concrete shear strength was greater than the factored shear force). An additional check was conducted to make sure that the maximum spacing limits could be used according to ACI code. After conducting all of these checks, it was determined that #4 stirrups could be used at seven and a half (7.5) inches for all Tbeams in the entire structure. Next, the starting locations were determined with a goal of having them roughly half of the spacing away from the supports. It was actually determined that the stirrups could start exactly one half of the spacing away from the supports, which is three and threequarter (3.75) inches. Figure 7 shows the shear reinforcement. Figure 7: Shear Reinforcement Figures 8 shows a sample factored shear diagram for the floor load for beam lines A and G. It should be noted that the s max value of seven and a half (7.5) inches can be used everywhere. For the full set of shear diagrams, see Figures A13 to A18 in the Appendix.
16 Bartolini 16 Figure 8: Floor Load Shear Diagram for Beam Lines A & G The full Tbeam shear reinforcement design calculations can be found in Appendix E. Crack Control Cracks pose not only aesthetic problems to a building, but cracks also can lead to faster corrosion rates that can accelerate the failure of the beam. Therefore, ACI 318 limits the spacing of the rebar to control the cracking of the concrete. First the Tbeams were checked for cracking according to Equation (104) in ACI 318 with the assumption that the stress in the rebar was twothirds the yield stress. Every Tbeam section had adequate spacing of the longitudinal rebar. Next, the slab reinforcement was checked. Again using Equation (104) in ACI 318 and the assumption that the stress in the rebar was twothirds the yield stress, the maximum spacing allowed by code was found. However, this maximum spacing was twelve (12) inches, which was smaller than any of the slab reinforcing in the original design. Therefore, the slab reinforcing fails code and must be redesigned with a maximum spacing of twelve inches. The best way to accomplish this would be to reduce the size of the bar to a #3 bar and use the corresponding spacing needed per the strength requirements or twelve inches, whichever is smaller. This would be the most economical way to change the design, as it would most likely
17 Bartolini 17 not rely on an ACI minimum anymore. When a design relies on an ACI minimum it is typically not the most efficient design. The full crack control calculations can be found in Appendix F. Tbeam Deflection Control Deflections must be controlled in any structure in order to make the building feels safe and is serviceable. Additionally, deflections must be controlled so that the nonstructural components of the building do not fail. For the Tbeam deflection control analysis, the unfactored loads were used in the calculation, but were found exactly the same way as they were in the flexural design of the Tbeams. Additionally, each span was checked for deflection. Therefore, there were twelve (12) spans that had to be checked, as there were the exterior and interior spans under roof and floor loading for three distinct beam lines. The first step in the deflection calculation was to find the effective moment of inertia of the T beam crosssection assuming the full load was applied to the building early on in the construction process (this is in order to be conservative). This effective moment of inertia is the moment of inertia for the beam based on the amount of cracking in the beam (it is always somewhere inbetween the moment of inertia of a fully cracked beam and a completely uncracked beam). First the gross moment of inertia was found for the Tbeam crosssections (disregarding the fact that there was steel in the Tbeam, which is allowed by code and is conservative). Then each critical point on each span (i.e. the negative bending moments near the columns and the positive bending moment at the midspan) was checked to see if the section was cracked. If the section was cracked (which was the case for the majority of the sections), the cracked moment of inertia for the beam was calculated. Next the effective moment of inertia for each of the critical sections was found according to ACI 318 using the weighted average method for each span (i.e. the midspan effective moment of inertia was multiplied by one half and each of the support effective moment of inertias was multiplied by one quarter). Using the deflection equation for a continuous span, the deflection under the total load was found.
18 Bartolini 18 It was assumed that the beam carried a partition that was sensitive to deflections and therefore according to ACI 318, the beam deflection after the partition is installed cannot be greater than the span length divided by 480. The assumed loading history used was that the partitions were installed after the shoring from the dead load of the structure was removed and the immediate deflection due to the dead load was experienced. Therefore, the deflection experienced by the partitions would be the longterm dead load deflection; the immediate live load deflection for both the shortterm portion of the live load (50 psf) and the sustained portion of the live load, which was the partition s weight (20 psf); and the longterm deflection from the partitions. Assuming that after the full initial deflection occurred, that the stressstrain plot was linear and passed through the origin, the above deflections were calculated using ACI 318. All the T beams passed except the interior spans under floor loads for beam column lines B, C, D, E and F. These crosssections would need to be redesigned with a larger Tbeam web depth or maybe additional steel. However, if additional steel was added, the design must be rechecked to make sure the extreme tension fiber stress is below the limits set by ACI 318. The full set of deflection calculations can be found in Appendix G. Column Design The last part of the design that was completed was the determination of the reinforcement for the columns. The columns are the most critical part of the building because the failure of a column, especially a column lower in the building, could have devastating ramifications. The failure of a column could result in the failure of a large portion, or all, of the building. Columns are deemed more important in the design of building than the design of the beams or the floor systems because if a beam or floor collapses, the damage may be contained to a much smaller area than if a column fails. This is called the strong column, weak beam design theory. First the maximum axial and moment loads that each column could experience were found. These loads were divided into the dead loads (i.e. mechanical equipment, roofing material, slab selfweight, column selfweight, Tbeam selfweight) and the live loads (i.e. the partitions, general live load, and snow). The top and bottom of each column were analyzed by looking at two different loading conditions. Both conditions include the entire dead load of the structure. However, the loading conditions vary based on which bays the live load is applied. For both
19 Bartolini 19 scenarios the simplest loading scenario that causes the maximum bending is assumed to be the starting point (this is typically achieved by applying the live load on the bay that frames into the section of the column being analyzed that causes that largest moment). In the first loading scenario, the live load is then applied to the other bays of the structure as long as the moment in the column being analyzed is not affected. In the second loading scenario, only the initial live load to cause the maximum moment is applied (i.e. no additional bays are loaded from the first step). In this way, the column is designed for both axial loading and eccentric loading. Using these loading scenarios, the moment was calculated in the beams and using structural analysis the distribution of the moment in the beam to the moments in the column was computed. Then using this moment in the column along with the axial load in the column, the reinforcement was found using Graph A.5 and Graph A.6 in Nilson et al for both loading cases at the top and bottom of each column. Next, the governing steel requirement was found for a given column (i.e. the largest steel requirement from the top and bottom of each column when considering both loading conditions). After the longitudinal steel was chosen, the ties were chosen in accordance to ACI 318. Since #4 bars were used as the stirrups in the Tbeams, #4 ties were also chosen so that there was consistency in the materials on the jobsite and no confusion would be made between the bars. Using the constraints that the spacing could not be more than sixteen times the diameter of the longitudinal steel, fortyeight times the diameter of the ties and the least dimension of the compression member, the tie spacing was determined for every floor of every column line as well. The longitudinal reinforcement along with the tie spacing for each story of every column in the building is present in Tables 1 and 2. The exterior column notation refers to columns on grid lines 1 and 4 while the interior column notation refers to columns on grid lines 2 and 3.
20 Bartolini 20 Table 1: Column Longitudinal Reinforcement Story Column Lines A and G Column Lines B and F Column Lines C, D and E Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior 1 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #9 4 #7 4 # #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #9 4 #7 4 # #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 4 #7 5 4 #7 4 #7 4 #11 4 #7 4 #11 4 #7 Table 2: Column Tie Spacing Story Column Lines A and G Column Lines B and F Column Lines C, D and E Exterior Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Interior A number of the column longitudinal reinforcement was based on the ACI minimum of 1% steel in the column. This indicates an efficient design. Ideally the percentage of steel in the column should be closer to 4%. Therefore, in future iterations of this design, a smaller columns size should be used. The pattern in the column reinforcement is that on the exterior of the building, the roof experiences considerable bending and therefore more steel is needed in these regions. Additionally, the interior middle column lines of the structure also need additional reinforcement at the lower stories due to the large axial loads that the columns are subjected to. Figure 9 shows the column crosssections for column lines B2, B3, F2 and F3.
21 Bartolini 21 Figure 9: Column Reinforcement for Interior Column Lines B and F (B2, B3, F2, F3) The crosssections showing the reinforcement for all the column lines can be found in Appendix A (FigureA19 to Figure A23). The tabulated data for the design of the columns can be found in Appendix H. In these tabulations, any column reinforcement that is denoted with an asterisk means that for this value, a higher value of the reduction factor (ϕ) was used to keep the necessary steel reinforcement to a minimum. This higher value was checked for each section in which it was used and all calculations comply with ACI 318. Summary and Conclusions Using ACI 318, a preliminary design of a fivestory office reinforced concrete office building was completed. Overall, the structure is a very efficient building with only a couple of edits needed in future iterations of the design. It was determined that the design did not fully comply with ACI 318 code, but that these flaws would be revised in future edits to the overall design. The loads for the structure were determined from ASCE 7 with the load combinations from ACI 318. The columns were determined to be fifteen (15) inches by fifteen (15) inches with a slab thickness of seven (7) inches and Tbeam depths that varied from eighteen (18) inches to twenty (20) inches in the first design. These Tbeam depths would be increased for selected beam lines up to twentytwo (22) inches for deflection control reasons. The chosen Tbeam flexural reinforcement was verified through crack control checks and strength checks, as was the Tbeam shear reinforcement. However, the slab reinforcement did not comply the ACI 318 crack control standards. Therefore, the size and spacing of the slab reinforcing would have to be edited in the
22 Bartolini 22 next design check to make sure the spacing was no more than twelve (12) inches. Finally, the reinforcement in the columns varied throughout the structure with the maximum reinforcement in the top of the exterior column lines (due to high bending) and at the bottom of the interior columns lines (due to large axial loads). The ties for the columns were also designed according to ACI 318. Because the minimum steel reinforcement according to ACI 318 was used for the columns, these columns should be made smaller in future iterations of the design so the structure can be more efficient. The next step in this design project would be to complete a number of iterations on the design until it compiles with ACI 318. Recommendations This design is only a preliminary design for this reinforced concrete building and several further revisions are still needed for this design to be complete. In future revisions to this building, there are a handful of recommendations that I would make. The first is to reduce the slab reinforcement to #3 bars, which would mean a closer spacing. This would be the most economic solution to the problem with the spacing of the slab reinforcement that arose when checking the crack control. Whenever a design is forced to use a minimum value in the code, which was the case in the slab spacing, that design is typically not as economical as it could be. In this case, simply reducing the spacing while still using #4 bars would not be economical. Using a #3 bar at a smaller spacing would result in a more efficient design, as less material would be used. Additionally, I would increase the depth of the Tbeams under floor loading on beam lines B and F to twenty (20) inches and then I would increase the depth of the Tbeams under floor loading on beam lines C, D and E to twentyone (21) or twenty (22) inches. These changes would result in all the Tbeams being in compliance with ACI 318 deflection limits. Finally, since the column reinforcement was commonly governed by the ACI minimum, in future iterations I would decrease the column sizes so that the columns would be more efficient
23 Bartolini 23 and have closer to 4% steel instead of the minimum 1% steel. As stated above, whenever the design is limited by the ACI minimum, it means there is a more efficient way to the design the structure. In this case it would be smaller column sizes and more column steel reinforcement.
24 Bartolini 24 Appendix A: Design Figures Figure A1: Floor Slab Design Figure A2: Plan of Floor Slab Design (Top Steel)
25 Figure A3: Plan of Floor Slab Design (Bottom and Temperature/Shrinkage Steel) Bartolini 25
26 Bartolini 26 Figure A4: Roof Slab Design Figure A5: Plan of Roof Slab Design (Top Steel)
27 Figure A6: Plan of Roof Slab Design (Bottom and Temperature/Shrinkage Steel) Bartolini 27
28 Bartolini 28 Figure A7: Floor TBeam Reinforcing Elevation and Sections for Beam Lines A and G
29 Bartolini 29 Figure A8: Roof TBeam Reinforcing Elevation and Sections for Beam Lines A and G
30 Bartolini 30 Figure A9: Floor TBeam Reinforcing Elevation and Sections for Beam Lines B and F
31 Bartolini 31 Figure A10: Roof TBeam Reinforcing Elevation and Sections for Beam Lines B and F
32 Bartolini 32 Figure A11: Floor TBeam Reinforcing Elevation and Sections for Beam Lines C, D and E
33 Bartolini 33 Figure A12: Roof TBeam Reinforcing Elevation and Sections for Beam Lines C, D and E
34 Bartolini 34 Figure A13: Floor Load Shear Diagram for Beam Lines A & G Figure A14: Roof Load Shear Diagram for Columns A & G
35 Bartolini 35 Figure A15: Floor Load Shear Diagram for Columns B & F Figure A16: Roof Load Shear Diagram for Columns B & F
36 Bartolini 36 Figure A17: Floor Load Shear Diagram for Columns C, D & E Figure A18: Roof Load Shear Diagram for Columns C, D & E
37 Bartolini 37 Figure A19: Column Reinforcement For Column Lines A and G (A1, A2, A3, A4, G1, G2, G3, G4) Figure A20: Column Reinforcement for Exterior Column Lines B and F (B1, B4, F1, F4) Figure A21: Column Reinforcement for Exterior Column Lines C, D and E (C1, C4, D1, D4, E1, E4)
38 Bartolini 38 Figure A22: Column Reinforcement for Interior Column Lines B and F (B2, B3, F2, F3) Figure A23: Column Reinforcement for Interior Column Lines C, D and E (C2, C3, D2, D3, E2, E3)
39 Bartolini 39 Appendix B: Loading Estimation Table B1: Roof Load Calculation Unfactored Loads (psf) Load Factor Factored Loads (psf) Snow Roofing Material Mech. Eq, Ceiling Slab (7") Total Table B2: Floor Load Calculation Unfactored Loads (psf) Load Factor Factored Loads (psf) Live Load Mech. Eq., Ceiling Partitions Slab (7") Total 235
40 Bartolini 40 Appendix C: Slab Design Calculations Table C1: Slab Design  Floor Givens Quadratic Equation Solver wu (lb/ft) 235 a b 12 b d 6 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 ln (in) Mcoeff Mu (lbin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) A smin (in 2 ) A sgoverning (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 15" 15" 15" 15" 13" A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS d OK OK OK OK OK OK a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK OK Max Spacing (1) Max Spacing (2) Spacing < Max Spacing OK OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Spacing Spacing > Min Spacing OK OK OK OK OK OK Temperature/Shrinkage Steel A smin (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" A sprovided (in 2 ) Max Spacing (1) Max Spacing (2) Spacing < Max Spacing OK OK OK OK OK OK
41 Bartolini 41 Table C2: Slab Design  Roof Givens Quadratic Equation Solver wu (lb/ft) a b 12 b d 6 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 ln (in) Mcoeff Mu (lbin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) A smin (in 2 ) A sgoverning (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS d OK OK OK OK OK OK a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK OK Max Spacing (1) Max Spacing (2) Spacing < Max Spacing OK OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Spacing Spacing > Min Spacing OK OK OK OK OK OK Temperature/Shrinkage Steel A smin (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" 15" A sprovided (in 2 ) Max Spacing (1) Max Spacing (2) Spacing < Max Spacing OK OK OK OK OK OK
42 Bartolini 42 Appendix D: TBeam Flexure Design Calculations Table D1: TBeam Flexure Design Floor Load Col. A/G Givens Quadratic Equation Solver W (lb/ft 2 ) 235 a wu (lb/ft) 0.15 b b 15 h 18 d (positive bending) 15.5 d (negative bending) 16 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 ln (in) Clear Span Length (in) bf (in)  span length bf (in)  slab thickness bf (in)  adjacent span bf (in)  governing Mcoeff Mu (kin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 2 #7 2 #7 2 #9 2 #9 3 #7 A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS Spacing d a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Steel (1) Minimum Steel (2) Governing Minimum Steel Steel > Minimum Steel OK OK OK OK OK φmn φmn > Mu OK OK OK OK OK
43 Bartolini 43 Table D2: TBeam Flexure Design Roof Load Col. A/G Givens Quadratic Equation Solver W (lb/ft 2 ) a wu (lb/ft) 0.12 b b 15 h 18 d (positive bending) 15.5 d (negative bending) 16 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 ln (in) Clear Span Length (in) bf (in)  span length bf (in)  slab thickness bf (in)  adjacent span bf (in)  governing Mcoeff Mu (kin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 3 #5 3 #5 3 #7 3 #7 2 #7 A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS Spacing d a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Steel (1) Minimum Steel (2) Governing Minimum Steel Steel > Minimum Steel OK OK OK OK OK φmn φmn > Mu OK OK OK OK OK
44 Bartolini 44 Table D3: TBeam Flexure Design Floor Load Col. B/F Givens Quadratic Equation Solver W (lb/ft 2 ) 235 a wu (k/in) 0.31 b b 15 H 18 d (positive bending) 15.5 d (negative bending) 16 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 ln (in) Clear Span Length (in) bf (in)  span length bf (in)  slab thickness bf (in)  adjacent span bf (in)  governing Mcoeff Mu (kin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 2 #9 4 #7 7 #7 7 #7 5 #7 A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS Spacing d a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Steel (1) Minimum Steel (2) Governing Minimum Steel Steel > Minimum Steel OK OK OK OK OK φmn φmn > Mu OK OK OK OK OK
45 Bartolini 45 Table D4: TBeam Flexure Design Roof Load Col. B/F Givens Quadratic Equation Solver W (lb/ft 2 ) a wu (lb/ft) 0.24 b b 15 h 18 d (positive bending) 15.5 d (negative bending) 16 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 ln (in) Clear Span Length (in) bf (in)  span length bf (in)  slab thickness bf (in)  adjacent span bf (in)  governing Mcoeff Mu (kin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 5 # 5 3 #7 6 # 7 6 #7 4 #7 A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS Spacing d a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Steel (1) Minimum Steel (2) Governing Minimum Steel Steel > Minimum Steel OK OK OK OK OK φmn φmn > Mu OK OK OK OK OK
46 Bartolini 46 Table D5: TBeam Flexure Design Floor Load Col. C/D/E Givens Quadratic Equation Solver W (lb/ft 2 ) 235 a wu (lb/ft) b b 15 H 20 d (positive bending) 17.5 d (negative bending) 18 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 ln (in) Clear Span Length (in) bf (in)  span length bf (in)  slab thickness bf (in)  adjacent span bf (in)  governing Mcoeff Mu (kin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 2 #9 4 #7 4 #9 4 #9 5 #7 A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS Spacing d a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Steel (1) Minimum Steel (2) Governing Minimum Steel Steel > Minimum Steel OK OK OK OK OK φmn φmn > Mu OK OK OK OK OK
47 Bartolini 47 Table D6: TBeam Flexure Design Roof Load Col. C/D/E Givens Quadratic Equation Solver W (lb/ft 2 ) a wu (lb/ft) 0.26 b b 15 h 20 d (positive bending) 17.5 d (negative bending) 18 φ 0.9 β 0.85 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 ln (in) Clear Span Length (in) bf (in)  span length bf (in)  slab thickness bf (in)  adjacent span bf (in)  governing Mcoeff Mu (kin) R (psi) ρ A sreqd (in 2 ) Bar Size and Spacing 3 #7 3 #7 3 #9 3 #9 4 #7 A sprovided (in 2 ) CHECKS Spacing d a c εt Max Steel ok if εt > OK OK OK OK OK φ = 0.90 if εt > OK OK OK OK OK Minimum Steel (1) Minimum Steel (2) Governing Minimum Steel Steel > Minimum Steel OK OK OK OK OK φmn φmn > Mu OK OK OK OK OK
48 Bartolini 48 Appendix E: TBeam Shear Design Calculations Table E1: TBeam Shear Design Floor Load Col. A/G Givens W (lb/ft 2 ) 235 wu (k/in) 0.15 b 15 h 18 d (positive bending) φ 0.75 A v 0.4 (#4 stirrups) A B C ln (in) C v V u V u at d φv c s max (1) s max (2) s max (3) s max (4) smax φv s φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd φvs < 4φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd OK OK OK φvs < 8φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd OK OK OK smin smax<smin OK OK OK Practical Limit (s>4") OK OK OK SPACING Exterior  Interior # of spacing # of stirrups # of spacing (actual) distance away from support
49 Bartolini 49 Table E2: TBeam Shear Design Roof Load Col. A/G Givens W (lb/ft 2 ) wu (lb/ft) 0.12 b 15 h 18 d (postive bending) φ 0.75 A v 0.4 (#4 stirrups) A B C ln (in) C v V u V u at d φv c s max (1) s max (2) s max (3) s max (4) smax φv s φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd φvs < 4φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd OK OK OK φvs < 8φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd OK OK OK smin smax<smin  OK OK Practical Limit (s>4") OK OK OK SPACING Exterior  Interior # of spacing # of stirrups # of spacing (actual) distance away from support
50 Bartolini 50 Table E3: TBeam Shear Design Floor Load Col. B/F Givens W (lb/ft 2 ) 235 wu (k/in) 0.31 b 15 h 18 d (postive bending) φ 0.75 A v 0.4 (#4 stirrups) A B C ln (in) C v V u V u at d φv c s max (1) s max (2) s max (3) s max (4) smax φv s φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd φvs < 4φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd OK OK OK φvs < 8φ*sqrt(f'c)*bwd OK OK OK smin smax<smin OK OK OK Practical Limit (s>4") OK OK OK SPACING Exterior  Interior # of spacing # of stirrups # of spacing (actual) distance away from support
A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.
Design Step 4 Design Step 4.1 DECK SLAB DESIGN In addition to designing the deck for dead and live loads at the strength limit state, the AASHTOLRFD specifications require checking the deck for vehicular
More informationSECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED
SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design, it is preferable to draw moment diagrams
More informationTechnical Notes 3B  Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993
Technical Notes 3B  Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993 Abstract: This Technical Notes is a design aid for the Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures (ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 40292) and Specifications
More informationReinforced Concrete Design
FALL 2013 C C Reinforced Concrete Design CIVL 4135 ii 1 Chapter 1. Introduction 1.1. Reading Assignment Chapter 1 Sections 1.1 through 1.8 of text. 1.2. Introduction In the design and analysis of reinforced
More informationSECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE
SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: TREY HAMILTON, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design,
More informationSECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE
SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: TREY HAMILTON, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA NOTE: MOMENT DIAGRAM CONVENTION In PT design,
More informationETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA
ETABS Integrated Building Design Software Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA Version 8 January 2002 Copyright The computer program ETABS and all
More informationTechnical Assignment 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...3 Introduction..5 Gravity Loads......6 Design Codes......7 Materials..8 Existing Structural System.. 10 Existing Floor System 15 Alternate Floor Framing Systems...17
More informationDetailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures
Chapter 8 Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures 8.1 Scope Provisions of Sec. 8.1 and 8.2 of Chapter 8 shall apply for detailing of reinforcement in reinforced concrete members, in general. For
More informationETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Frame Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA
ETABS Integrated Building Design Software Concrete Frame Design Manual Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA Version 8 January 2002 Copyright The computer program ETABS and all associated
More informationSPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN
CHAPTER Structural Steel Design LRFD Method Third Edition SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Part II Structural
More informationConcrete Frame Design Manual
Concrete Frame Design Manual Turkish TS 5002000 with Turkish Seismic Code 2007 For SAP2000 ISO SAP093011M26 Rev. 0 Version 15 Berkeley, California, USA October 2011 COPYRIGHT Copyright Computers and Structures,
More informationFigure 511. Test setup
5.5. Load Procedure A uniform load configuration was used for the load tests. An air bag, placed on the top surface of the slab, was used for this purpose, and the load was applied by gradually increasing
More informationSEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 16, 2004 Paper No. 3279 SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP Yuming DING 1, Bruce HAMERSLEY 2 SUMMARY Vancouver
More informationDesign for Nonstructural Components
14 Design for Nonstructural Components Robert Bachman, S.E., John Gillengerten, S.E. and Susan Dowty, S.E. Contents 14.1 DEVELOPMENT AND BACKGROUND OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS... 3
More informationDeflection Calculation of RC Beams: Finite Element Software Versus Design Code Methods
Deflection Calculation of RC Beams: Finite Element Software Versus Design Code Methods G. Kaklauskas, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 1223 Vilnius, Lithuania (gintaris.kaklauskas@st.vtu.lt) V.
More information[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]
[Helios Plaza] Houston, Texas Structural Option Adviser: Dr. Linda Hanagan [TECHNICAL REPORT I:] Structural Concepts & Existing Conditions Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Introduction... 3 Structural
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges
7.7 Truss bridges Fig. 7.21 some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges Truss Girders, lattice girders or open web girders are efficient and economical structural systems, since the members experience
More informationAPE T CFRP Aslan 500
Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Tape is used for structural strengthening of concrete, masonry or timber elements using the technique known as Near Surface Mount or NSM strengthening. Use of CFRP
More informationInternational Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL
PROJECT International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL EXP. 11/30/2014 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS July 24, 2014 BOWMAN, BARRETT & ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 312.228.0100
More informationBRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS APRIL 2000 SECTION 9  PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
SECTION 9  PRESTRESSED CONCRETE Part A General Requirements and Materials 9.1 APPLICATION 9.1.1 General The specifications of this section are intended for design of prestressed concrete bridge members.
More informationThe Impact of Market Demands on Residential PostTensioned Foundation Design: An Ethical Dilemma
The Impact of Market Demands on Residential PostTensioned Foundation Design: An Ethical Dilemma Bart B. Barrett, B.S., P.E.1 Kerry S. Lee, M.B.A., P.E., M. ASCE2 Erik L. Nelson, Ph.D., P.E., M. ASCE3
More informationFundamentals of PostTensioned Concrete Design for Buildings
Fundamentals of PostTensioned Concrete Design for Buildings Part One by John P. Miller www.suncam.com Copyright 2012 John P. Miller Page 1 of 49 Overview of This Course This is Part One of a threepart
More informationGuidelines for the Design of PostTensioned Floors
Guidelines for the Design of PostTensioned Floors BY BIJAN O. AALAMI AND JENNIFER D. JURGENS his article presents a set of guidelines intended to T assist designers in routine posttensioning design,
More informationABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM
Ninth LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference (LACCEI 11), Engineering for a Smart Planet, Innovation, Information Technology and Computational Tools for Sustainable Development, August 3, 11,
More informationChapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs. Bridge Engineering 1
Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs Bridge Engineering 1 Basic types of bridge decks Insitu reinforced concrete deck (most common type) Precast concrete deck (minimize the use of local labor) Open steel grid
More informationLongterm serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations
Design Step 7.1 INTEGRAL ABUTMENT DESIGN General considerations and common practices Integral abutments are used to eliminate expansion joints at the end of a bridge. They often result in Jointless Bridges
More informationSTRUSOFT EXAMPLES PRESTRESS 6.4
EXAMPLES PRESTRESS 6.4 STEP BY STEP EXAMPLES 6.o4.oo52o14o7o18 Page 1 CONTENTS 1 BASIC CONCEPT 2 1.1 CODES 2 1.2 LAYOUT OF THE PROGRAM 3 1.3 LIMITATIONS IN THE CURRENT VERSION 3 2 EXAMPLES 4 2.1 MODELLING
More informationReport on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars
Report on Wind Resistance of Signs supported by Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars Prepared for US Sign and Fabrication Corporation January, 2006 SUMMARY This study found the attachment of
More informationBEHAVIOR OF SHORT CONCRETE COLUMNS REINFORCED BY CFRP BARS AND SUBJECTED TO ECCENTRIC LOAD
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 6, Issue 10, Oct 2015, pp. 1524 Article ID: IJCIET_06_10_002 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=6&itype=10
More informationbi directional loading). Prototype ten story
NEESR SG: Behavior, Analysis and Design of Complex Wall Systems The laboratory testing presented here was conducted as part of a larger effort that employed laboratory testing and numerical simulation
More informationDesign and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures
Buildings Department Practice Note for Authorized Persons, Registered Structural Engineers and Registered Geotechnical Engineers APP68 Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures
More informationLEGACY REPORT. www.icces.org (800) 4236587 (562) 6990543 A Subsidiary of the International Code Council. *Corrected March 2014
ICCES Legacy Report PFC3700* Issued October 2003 www.icces.org (00) 42357 (52) 990543 A Subsidiary of the International Code Council Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code and the 2000 International
More informationConcrete Design to Eurocode 2
Concrete Design to Eurocode 2 Jenny Burridge MA CEng MICE MIStructE Head of Structural Engineering Introduction to the Eurocodes Eurocode Eurocode 1 Eurocode 2 Materials Cover Flexure Shear Deflection
More informationSAMUEL ÁVILA STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY CONSULTANT: THOMAS BOOTHBY UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA S ACADEMIC VILLAGES ORLANDO, FL
SAMUEL ÁVILA STRUCTURAL OPTION FACULTY CONSULTANT: THOMAS BOOTHBY UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA S ACADEMIC VILLAGES ORLANDO, FL THESIS PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DECEMBER 12, 2005 Introduction: The University
More informationEvaluation of Bridge Performance and Rating through Nondestructive
Evaluation of Bridge Performance and Rating through Nondestructive Load Testing Final Report Prepared by: Andrew Jeffrey, Sergio F. Breña, and Scott A.Civjan University of Massachusetts Amherst Department
More informationAnalysis and Repair of an EarthquakeDamaged Highrise Building in Santiago, Chile
Analysis and Repair of an EarthquakeDamaged Highrise Building in Santiago, Chile J. Sherstobitoff Ausenco Sandwell, Vancouver, Canada P. Cajiao AMEC, Vancouver, Canada P. Adebar University of British
More informationStructural Analysis. EUROCODE 2 Background and Applications
Dissemination of information for training Brussels, 2021 October 2011 1 Prof. Dr.Ing. Manfred Curbach TU Dresden, Institute for Concrete Structures M.Sc. Martin Just TU Dresden, Institute for Concrete
More informationLOAD TESTING FOR BRIDGE RATING: DEAN S MILL OVER HANNACROIS CREEK
REPORT FHWA/NY/SR06/147 LOAD TESTING FOR BRIDGE RATING: DEAN S MILL OVER HANNACROIS CREEK OSMAN HAGELSAFI JONATHAN KUNIN SPECIAL REPORT 147 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUREAU New York State
More informationSession 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges
Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges Douglas R. Heath P.E., Structural Engineer Corey Richard P.E., Project Manager AECOM Overview Bridge Testing/Rating
More informationMETHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST
Compression Test, METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST Tension Test and Lateral Test According to the American Standards ASTM D1143 07, ASTM D3689 07, ASTM D3966 07 and Euro Codes EC7 Table of Contents
More informationEFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLESTAYED BRIDGES
EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLESTAYED BRIDGES YangCheng Wang Associate Professor & Chairman Department of Civil Engineering Chinese Military Academy FengShan 83000,Taiwan Republic
More informationSeismic performance evaluation of an existing school building in Turkey
CHALLENGE JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL MECHANICS 1 (4) (2015) 161 167 Seismic performance evaluation of an existing school building in Turkey Hüseyin Bilgin * Department of Civil Engineering, Epoka University,
More informationFire and Concrete Structures
Fire and Concrete Structures Authors: David N. Bilow, P.E., S.E., Director, Engineered Structures, Portland Cement Association 5420 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077,Phone 8479729064, email: dbilow@cement.org
More informationload on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.
How Many Piers? By Gary Collins, P.E. A clearcut guide to helical pier spacing Introduction Helical pier spacing is not an exact science. How many does it take to support a structure adequately or repair
More informationOPTIMAL DIAGRID ANGLE TO MINIMIZE DRIFT IN HIGHRISE STEEL BUILDINGS SUBJECTED TO WIND LOADS
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 6, Issue 11, Nov 215, pp. 11, Article ID: IJCIET_6_11_1 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=6&itype=11
More informationUnderpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles
Helical Piles Howard A. Perko Copyright 0 2009 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. C h a p t e r 14 Underpinning Systems There has been tremendous growth in the use of helical piles for underpinning
More informationResidential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair
Juneau Permit Center, 4 th Floor Marine View Center, (907)5860770 This handout is designed to help you build your deck to comply with the 2006 International Residential Building code as modified by the
More informationSeismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings
Seismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings In Turkey H. Sucuoğlu & A. Yakut Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey J. Kubin & A. Özmen Prota Inc, Ankara, Turkey SUMMARY Over the past
More informationEVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE  FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BUCHAREST
EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE  FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING BUCHAREST Abstract Camelia SLAVE University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, 59 Marasti
More informationAnalysis of a Tower Crane Accident
The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 2008, 2, 287293 287 Analysis of a Tower Crane Accident Open Access M. H. Arslan* and M. Y. Kaltakci Selcuk University, Engineering and Architecture
More informationResidential Foundations and Basements
Residential Foundations and Basements Disclaimer All of the following information is based on the 2006 International Residential Code with Kentucky Amendments. As some information is paraphrased, article
More informationSystem. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor
Model 150 HELICAL ANCHOR System PN #MBHAT Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor System About Foundation Supportworks is a network of the most experienced and knowledgeable foundation repair
More information8.2 Elastic Strain Energy
Section 8. 8. Elastic Strain Energy The strain energy stored in an elastic material upon deformation is calculated below for a number of different geometries and loading conditions. These expressions for
More informationInsitu Load Testing to Evaluate New Repair Techniques
Insitu Load Testing to Evaluate New Repair Techniques W.J. Gold 1 and A. Nanni 2 1 Assistant Research Engineer, Univ. of Missouri Rolla, Dept. of Civil Engineering 2 V&M Jones Professor, Univ. of Missouri
More informationStrengthening of Large Storage Tank Foundation Walls in an Aggressive Environment by External Posttensioning. May 7th 2013: Dominique Deschamps
Strengthening of Large Storage Tank Foundation Walls in an Aggressive Environment by External Posttensioning May 7th 2013: Dominique Deschamps Scope of the paper Presentation of the project Cause of cracks
More informationNovember 20, 2013. Heather Sustersic had132@psu.edu. Dear Professor Sustersic,
November 20, 2013 Heather Sustersic had132@psu.edu Dear Professor Sustersic, The following technical report was written to fulfill the requirements specified in the Structural Technical Report 4 assignment
More informationPCI BIG BEAM COMPETITION
PCI BIG BEAM COMPETITION Official Rules for the PCI Engineering Design Competition Academic Year 201516 PROGRAM The PCI Student Education Committee is inviting entries from students to participate in
More informationANALYSIS FOR BEHAVIOR AND ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CORBELS WITH HYBRID REINFORCEMENT
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 6, Issue 10, Oct 2015, pp. 2535 Article ID: IJCIET_06_10_003 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=6&itype=10
More informationEAST LYME HIGH SCHOOL
Overview: 1971 N 1966 GYM 1966 CLASSROOM WING 1966 AUD. 1971 GYM 1998 1998 POOL EAST LYME HIGH SCHOOL Original 1966 Building: The original East Lyme High School was constructed in 1966 and was composed
More informationIMPROVING THE STRUT AND TIE METHOD BY INCLUDING THE CONCRETE SOFTENING EFFECT
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 2, MarchApril 2016, pp. 117 127, Article ID: IJCIET_07_02_009 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=2
More informationRetrofitting By Means Of Post Tensioning. Khaled Nahlawi 1
Retrofitting By Means Of Post Tensioning Khaled Nahlawi 1 Abstract An analytical program was prepared to retrofit the Holy Cross Church in Santa Cruz, California. An inelastic analysis was perfonned on
More informationFOAMULAR LT40, 400 and 600 insulations with minimum compressive strengths of
Technical Guide FOAMULAR Extruded Polystyrene Insulation For Cold Storage Applications FOAMULAR extruded polystyrene insulation is suitable for virtually all cold storage insulating needs, including floors,
More informationWindow Glass Design 5 According to ASTM E 1300
A User s Guide to: Window Glass Design 5 According to ASTM E 1300 A product of: 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures Chapter 1: Window Glass Design 5 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Features ii iv
More informationThe Collapse of Building 7 by Arthur Scheuerman December 8, 06
The Collapse of Building 7 by Arthur Scheuerman December 8, 06 WTC s Building 7 was a 47story office building completed in 1987 by Silverstein Properties on land owned by the Port Authority. It was built
More informationFigure A. Maximum load testing of new precast concrete floor plank system
Load Testing of Precast Concrete Plank By Peter Gorgas, E.I.T. Figure A. Maximum load testing of new precast concrete floor plank system Overview Testing was performed in July 2012 at Northeast Precast
More informationPrepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California 94103. Prepared By
Project Structural Conditions Survey and Seismic Vulnerability Assessment For SFCC Civic Center Campus 750 Eddy Street San Francisco, California 94109 Prepared For San Francisco Community College District
More informationStability. Security. Integrity.
Stability. Security. Integrity. PN #MBHPT Foundation Supportworks provides quality helical pile systems for both new construction and retrofit applications. 288 Helical Pile System About Foundation Supportworks
More informationETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Composite Floor Frame Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA
ETABS Integrated Building Design Software Composite Floor Frame Design Manual Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA Version 8 January 2002 Copyright The computer program ETABS and all
More informationSolid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation
Solid Mechanics Stress What you ll learn: What is stress? Why stress is important? What are normal and shear stresses? What is strain? Hooke s law (relationship between stress and strain) Stress strain
More informationStress Strain Relationships
Stress Strain Relationships Tensile Testing One basic ingredient in the study of the mechanics of deformable bodies is the resistive properties of materials. These properties relate the stresses to the
More informationFire Preventive and Fireproof Performance Test and Evaluation Procedure Manual
BR BO0102 Effective from June 1, 2000 Revision: March 26, 2002 Fire Preventive and Fireproof Performance Test and Evaluation Procedure Manual (Unofficial Manual) Technical Appraisal Department, Building
More informationProject Report. Structural Investigations Hotel del Sol Yuma, Arizona
Project Report Structural Investigations Yuma, Arizona Prepared by: 2619 Spruce Street Boulder, CO 80302 3034443620 Prepared for: Principle Engineering Group, Inc. 833 East Plaza Circle, Suite 100 Yuma,
More information5 G R A TINGS ENGINEERING DESIGN MANUAL. MBG Metal Bar Grating METAL BAR GRATING MANUAL MBG 53412 METAL BAR GRATING NAAMM
METAL BAR NAAMM GRATNG MANUAL MBG 53412 5 G R A TNG NAAMM MBG 53412 November 4, 2012 METAL BAR GRATNG ENGNEERNG DEGN MANUAL NAAMM MBG 53412 November 4, 2012 5 G R A TNG MBG Metal Bar Grating A Division
More informationS03: Tier 1 Assessment of Shear in Concrete Short Span Bridges to AS 5100 and AS 3600
Annexure S03: Tier 1 Assessment of Shear in Concrete Short Span Bridges to AS 5100 and AS 3600 April 2014 Copyright http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ State of Queensland (Department of Transport
More informationMILMAN & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ PROJECT MANAGERS
MILMAN & ASSOCIATES STRUCTURAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ PROJECT MANAGERS May 29, 2013 Revision B Structural Guideline for Design and Installation Holes in Composite Floor Slab Terminal 3, Departure Level
More informationStrength Evaluation by Load Testing
Strength Evaluation by Load Testing Recommendations for test load magnitude and acceptance criteria By Thomas E. Nehil, Antonio Nanni, and Filippo Masetti In this article, we ll summarize recent work by
More informationNonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Design and Structural Assessment
1 Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Design and Structural Assessment Jan Cervenka Červenka Consulting, Prague, Czech Republic Outline: Červenka Consulting  Computer simulation (virtual
More informationCHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE
CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE 9.1 INTRODUCTION An important reason that composite piles have not gained wide acceptance in the civil engineering practice is the lack of a long
More informationLEGACY REPORT ER5110. www.icces.org. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, 2003. Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code
LEGACY REPORT Reissued November 1, 2003 ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. www.icces.org Business/Regional Office # 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 # (562) 6990543 Regional Office # 900
More informationMiss S. S. Nibhorkar 1 1 M. E (Structure) Scholar,
Volume, Special Issue, ICSTSD Behaviour of Steel Bracing as a Global Retrofitting Technique Miss S. S. Nibhorkar M. E (Structure) Scholar, Civil Engineering Department, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering
More informationResidential Decks. Planning and Development Services Department
Building Safety Division 8500 Santa Fe Drive Overland Park, KS 66212 (913) 8956225 Fax (913) 8955016 Email: permitservices@opkansas.org Planning and Development Services Department Residential Decks
More informationStructural welding is a process by which the parts that are to be connected are heated and
CHAPTER 6. WELDED CONNECTIONS 6.1 INTRODUCTORY CONCEPTS Structural welding is a process by which the parts that are to be connected are heated and fused, with supplementary molten metal at the joint. A
More informationHunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal
Fall 2009 Hunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal To analyze how energy efficiency can be implemented using facade and green roof redesign. It ties structural engineering concepts with existing
More informationIntroduction. Background
Introduction Welcome to CFS, the comprehensive coldformed steel component design software. The endless variety of shapes and sizes of coldformed steel members, combined with the complex failure modes
More informationSMIP05 Seminar Proceedings VISUALIZATION OF NONLINEAR SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF THE INTERSTATE 5/14 NORTH CONNECTOR BRIDGE. Robert K.
VISUALIZATION OF NONLINEAR SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF THE INTERSTATE 5/14 NORTH CONNECTOR BRIDGE Robert K. Dowell Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering San Diego State University Abstract This paper
More informationSECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 6 SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. SCOPE OF WORK: The work to be performed under the provisions of these documents and the contract based thereon includes furnishing all labor, equipment, materials,
More informationResidential Prototype III. MultiStory. The MultiStory. Your connection to ideas + answers. Prepared by: AISC Steel Solutions Center
MultiStory Residential Prototype III The MultiStory Residential Prototype III Prepared by: AISC Steel Solutions Center What s this? This package tells the story of a fictitious project with an imaginary
More informationStructural Integrity Analysis
Structural Integrity Analysis 1. STRESS CONCENTRATION Igor Kokcharov 1.1 STRESSES AND CONCENTRATORS 1.1.1 Stress An applied external force F causes inner forces in the carrying structure. Inner forces
More informationChapter. Earthquake Damage: Types, Process, Categories
3 Chapter Earthquake Damage: Types, Process, Categories Earthquakes leave behind a trail of damage and destruction. People s lives are affected by the loss of loved ones, destruction of property, economic
More informationDESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS
8601 North Black Canyon Highway Suite 103 Phoenix, AZ 8501 For Professionals Engaged in PostTensioning Design Issue 14 December 004 DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS by James D. Rogers 1 1.0
More informationATINER's Conference Paper Series CIV20151710
ATINER CONFERENCE PAPER SERIES No: LNG20141176 Athens Institute for Education and Research ATINER ATINER's Conference Paper Series CIV20151710 Optimum Design of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Columns
More informationGeneral Approach. Structure Components. Is all lumber the same? Lumber Grades. Rafters Girders / Beams Columns. Sketch general structural layout
General Approach Sketch general structural layout Determine roof loading Determine required lumber dimensions Transfer load down the structure Structure Components Plants Structure Components Top Side
More information6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES
Retrofitting Post & Pier Houses 71 6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES by James E. Russell, P.E. 72 Retrofitting Post & Pier Houses Retrofitting Post & Pier Houses 73 RETROFITTING POST AND PIER HOUSES This
More informationWhat is Seismic Retrofitting?
What is Seismic Retrofitting? SEISMIC RETROFITTING A Seismic Retrofit provides existing structures with more resistance to seismic activity due to earthquakes. In buildings, this process typically includes
More informationAPPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP 1279 PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS
APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP 1279 PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS This appendix summarizes the criteria applied for the design of new hypothetical bridges considered in NCHRP 1279 s Task 7 parametric
More informationAnalysis II Façade Redesign: Architectural Precast Panels
Analysis II Façade Redesign: Architectural Precast Panels Analysis II Façade Redesign: Architectural Precast Panels Overview: This analysis covers the comparison of the current EIFS façade and my proposed
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS: TBEAMS AND DOUBLY REINFORCED BEAMS
CHAPTER Reinored Conrete Design Fith Edition REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS: TBEAMS AND DOUBLY REINFORCED BEAMS A. J. Clark Shool o Engineering Department o Civil and Environmental Engineering Part I Conrete
More informationLoad Design Charts. RCONTROL SIPs STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS. www.rcontrol.com CONTROL, NOT COMPROMISE.
RCONTROL s STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS Note: Information deemed reliable at time of printing. Please visit www.rcontrol.com for latest information. June 2012 CONTROL, NOT COMPROMISE. www.rcontrol.com
More informationRequirements for the Use of PRESSS MomentResisting Frame Systems
Requirements for the Use of PRESSS MomentResisting Frame Systems Neil M. Hawkins, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus Department of Civil Engineering University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign Urbana, Illinois S.
More information