Overview of Port and Waterway Asset Management Systems in Europe With Two Case Studies in Ireland By Terence M. Browne, P.E. and Brian Devlin, B.Eng., M.Eng, MIEI
Considerations Asset Managers and Systems in Europe Importance of Baseline and Monitoring Case Study #1: Waterways Ireland Case Study #2: Port of Cork Conclusions
Asset Management in Europe Bridge Management Conference Nottingham, UK 8 Nov 2008 Infrastructure Asset Management Conference London, UK 26/27 Feb 2008 www.iqpc.com
Asset Managers Waterway / Navigational Authorities (Public) Ports and Harbors (Public and Private)
Asset Management (AM) Systems Infrastructure Asset Management, 1960 s Water / Wastewater Asset Management Pavement Asset Management Software Bridge Asset Management Software Port/Harbor Asset Management Software
PIANC InComWorking Group 25 Basic AM to Advanced AM Key Decision Making Criteria: Safety, Value, Functional Needs, Sustainability Additional Decision Making Criteria: Ecological, Political, and Heritage
Submerged Assets at Ports and Harbors Deteriorated Concrete Piles Deteriorated Steel Piles
A Comprehensive Baseline Survey Of All Facilities Is The First Step For Asset Management
Conduct Full Baseline Survey Are Repairs/ Preventative Measures Required? Yes Prioritise and Design Repairs No Develop Long Term Asset Management Programme Routine Inspection/ Monitoring A Valid/Accurate Assessment Appropriate Recommendations Realistic Maintenance
Asset Monitoring Frequency -Baseline Inventory Survey -Routine Inspection (Interval Recommendations Vary from 3 months to 60 months) -In-depth/Special Inspections -Post-Event / Damage Inspections
Recommended Levels of Detail Level I 100% (Visual / Tactile) Level II 10% (Partial Cleaning) Level III 5% (NDT Testing)
Advanced Asset Management Systems Better Access to Information Improved Customer Service Increased Cost Savings Reduction in Risk
Two Case Studies from Ireland Case #1 Case #2 Waterways Ireland
Waterways Ireland Network: 1. Shannon-Erne 2. Erne 3. Grand Canal 4. Barrow 5. Lower Bann 6. Royal Canal 7. Shannon Port of Dublin Major Commercial Ports: A. Port of Cork B. Port of Dublin IRELAND Port of Cork
Case Study #1: Waterways Ireland Implementation Approach: - Complete Baseline Survey - Database System Input - Business Process Model - Asset Mgmt System w/ GIS Involvement: I.T., Finance, Engineering and Maintenance Departments
Waterway Ireland Assets Structural Assets: Bridges: 357 of 581 Locks: 114 Berths: 83 Dry Docks: 6 Misc. Buildings
Waterway Ireland Assets Environmental Assets: Navigable Waterway: 970 km Marshland and Habitats Water and Air (Rural and Urban) Recreational / Tourism Resources Historic / Archeological Treasures
Computerized Data Reports
3D Laser Scanning - Minimal Fieldwork - Computerized Model of Asset -10mm Accuracy
As-Built CAD Drawings
ARCHIE ANALYSIS
Hydraulic Scour Evaluations
Business Process Model and Management Flowcharts
Waterways Ireland Network: 1. Shannon-Erne 2. Erne 3. Grand Canal 4. Barrow 5. Lower Bann 6. Royal Canal 7. Shannon Port of Dublin Major Commercial Ports: A. Port of Cork B. Port of Dublin IRELAND Port of Cork
Case Study #2: Port of Cork Implementation Approach: - Complete Baseline Survey - Database System Input - Maintenance Prioritization - Comprehensive Reporting - Budgeting / Planning Involvement: Engineering and Maintenance Departments
Port Infrastructure City Quays Tivoli Ringaskiddy Cobh
PortSAMS Software Available Future GIS Integration Anticipated
Condition Ratings Established 1. Advanced Deterioration 2. Deteriorating 3. Fair 4. Good 5. New
Importance Ratings Established A - Critical Access To and Within Terminal B - High Revenue Generation C - Medium Value Revenue Generation D - Low Revenue Generation E - Not in Use
Maintenance Priority Matrix
Qualitative Risk Assessment Process CONSEQUENCE FACTOR PORT OF CORK FACILITIES - TIVOLI Bulk Berth Container Berths Ro-Ro berths Oil / Livestock Facility Timber Jetty Historical Importance Economic Importance Future Economic Importance Operational Importance Future Operational Importance Public Use and Access Risk = Probability of occurrence x Consequence of occurrence
Conclusions Lessons Learned from Case Studies Value of Asset Management for -Ports - Harbors - Waterway / Navigational Authorities
Value of Asset Management Maximize Safety and Security Maintain Readiness and Reliability Optimize and Extend Asset Life Cater to Increased Customer Demands Manage Regulatory/Social Requirements Optimize and Extend Asset Life
Questions