FOREST MONITORING AND BIOMASS ESTIMATION FOR REDD+ WITH INSAR

Similar documents
Jeongho SEO, Kyeonghak LEE, Raehyun KIM Korea Forest Research Institute. 6~8. Sept Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

2. VIIRS SDR Tuple and 2Dhistogram MIIC Server-side Filtering. 3. L2 CERES SSF OPeNDAP dds structure (dim_alias and fixed_dim)

Innovation and new land monitoring services for climate change, forests and agroforestry

LAND USE AND SEASONAL GREEN VEGETATION COVER OF THE CONTERMINOUS USA FOR USE IN NUMERICAL WEATHER MODELS

Time and Trees on the Map Land Cover Database 4

National and Sub-national Carbon monitoring tools developed at the WHRC

Outline - needs of land cover - global land cover projects - GLI land cover product. legend. Cooperation with Global Mapping project

Improving global data on forest area & change Global Forest Remote Sensing Survey

Market Size Forecasting Using the Monte Carlo Method. Multivariate Solutions

UK Global Forest Monitoring Network: Forest Carbon Tracking

Coastal Engineering Indices to Inform Regional Management

Testing steady states carbon stocks of Yasso07 and ROMUL models against soil inventory data in Finland

CLIMATE CHANGE & FORESTS; STATUS OF SCIENCE, POLICY & RESEARCH. Prof. Ravindranath Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

MAP GUIDE. Global Land Cover Characteristics Maps (USGS EROS) Summary

Using Remote Sensing to Monitor Soil Carbon Sequestration

- focus on green house gas emission

Global environmental information Examples of EIS Data sets and applications

Improvement of Lithuania s National System for GHG inventory preparation

Environmental Outcomes of Conservation Agriculture in North Italy

Methods for Monitoring Forest and Land Cover Changes and Unchanged Areas from Long Time Series

THE NATIONAL FOREST MONITORING SYSTEM (NFMS) BASED ON RAPIDEYE DATA ICF. Gerson Perdomo.

Impacts of a future city master plan on on thermal and wind environments in Vinh city, Vietnam

Evaluation of Wildfire Duration Time Over Asia using MTSAT and MODIS

Photogrammetric Point Clouds

I.Jonckheere, E. Lindquist & A. Pekkarinen FAO Forestry Department

TerraSAR X and TanDEM X satellite missions update & other activities Dana Floricioiu German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology

Australia s National Carbon Accounting System. Dr Gary Richards Director and Principal Scientist

MODIS IMAGES RESTORATION FOR VNIR BANDS ON FIRE SMOKE AFFECTED AREA

Supporting Online Material for Achard (RE ) scheduled for 8/9/02 issue of Science

Multi-scale upscaling approaches of soil properties from soil monitoring data

ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF CM AND GM ON BIOMASS CARBON STOCKS IN THE UK CEH, SRUC,AFBI

The European Renewable Energy Directive and international Trade. Laurent Javaudin Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.

Notable near-global DEMs include

Introduction to Imagery and Raster Data in ArcGIS

Threats to tropical forests

August 2012 EXAMINATIONS Solution Part I

Land-surface emissivity maps based on MSG/SEVIRI information

Remote Sensing Method in Implementing REDD+

dynamic vegetation model to a semi-arid

Land Use/ Land Cover Mapping Initiative for Kansas and the Kansas River Watershed

through NFIs CO 2 Biodiversity request Need for common reporting at the international level (Kyoto protocol, MCPFE, FAO reports, etc.

GEOGG142 GMES Calibration & validation of EO products

Uncertainty assessment of forest carbon balance. HMS seminaari 2.9 Vantaa

Week TSX Index

Report of the technical assessment of the proposed forest reference emission level of Brazil submitted in 2014

VCS REDD Methodology Module. Methods for monitoring forest cover changes in REDD project activities

Agriculture and Land use (ALU) Software: A tool for GHG Inventory and LEDS

Three distinct global estimates of historical land-cover change and land-use conversions for over 200 years

5.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL

Toma Danila Dragos. National Institute for Earth Physics Romania

Final Exam Practice Problem Answers

Tools for National Forest Monitoring Systems in the context of REDD+

Analysis of MODIS leaf area index product over soybean areas in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil

Estimation of Carbon Stock in Indian Forests. Subhash Ashutosh Joint Director Forest Survey of India

Module EN: Developing a Reference Level for Carbon Stock Enhancements

Land cover mapping in support of LAI and FPAR retrievals from EOS-MODIS and MISR: classification methods and sensitivities to errors

LEROY MERLÍN FUNDACIÓN JUAN XXIII-IBERMAIL. A Study of Forest Biomass Sustainability SHOUF BIOSPHERE RESERVE, LEBANON THERMAL BIOMASS PROJECT 2013

Understanding Raster Data

Monitoring Overview with a Focus on Land Use Sustainability Metrics


1. What is the critical value for this 95% confidence interval? CV = z.025 = invnorm(0.025) = 1.96

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

Premaster Statistics Tutorial 4 Full solutions

" Y. Notation and Equations for Regression Lecture 11/4. Notation:

Moderate- and high-resolution Earth Observation data based forest and agriculture monitoring in Russia using VEGA Web-Service

Global land cover mapping: conceptual and historical background

The Share of Non-Renewable Biomass in Wood Fuel Production & Consumption by Bio-climatic Zones in Nigeria

Overview. 1. Types of land dynamics 2. Methods for analyzing multi-temporal remote sensing data:

ANALYSIS 3 - RASTER What kinds of analysis can we do with GIS?

Topic 9. Factorial Experiments [ST&D Chapter 15]

Agroforestry and climate change. Emmanuel Torquebiau FAO webinar 5 February 2013

Crediting the displacement of non-renewable biomass under the CDM

INVESTIGA I+D+i 2013/2014

Technical paper. Summary

3D VISUALIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL WELLS DIRECTIONAL SURVEYS AND INTEGRATION WITH DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM)

Global land cover classi cation at 1 km spatial resolution using a classi cation tree approach

Let s SAR: Mapping and monitoring of land cover change with ALOS/ALOS-2 L-band data

The Global Fire Monitoring Center and the Global Wildland Fire Network A Thematic Platform of the UNISDR System

Regression Analysis: A Complete Example

Experiments in Complex Stands

Measurement and Monitoring of the World s Forests

SMEX04 Land Use Classification Data

SEMI-AUTOMATED CLOUD/SHADOW REMOVAL AND LAND COVER CHANGE DETECTION USING SATELLITE IMAGERY

Forest carbon sequestration and climate change. Dr Brian Tobin University College Dublin

SPREADSHEET EDUCATION MATERIAL USING REMOTE SENSING IMAGE AND MAP IMAGE

Cloud-based Geospatial Data services and analysis

BASIS FOR CONSISTENT REPRESENTATION OF LAND AREAS

Open Source Tools for Spatial Analysis and Geoprocessing

STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Beta Review. Suomi NPP Surface Reflectance IP ARP Product

Potential Climate Impact of Large-Scale Deployment of Renewable Energy Technologies. Chien Wang (MIT)

U.S. SOYBEAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL

Coastwide Reference Monitoring System Wetlands (CRMS-Wetlands) Project Update

Status of the World s Soil Resources

DATA MINING SPECIES DISTRIBUTION AND LANDCOVER. Dawn Magness Kenai National Wildife Refuge

A new SPOT4-VEGETATION derived land cover map of Northern Eurasia

METHODOLOGY TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN NON-RENEWABLE AND RENEWABLE BIOMASS

Enhanced DEM-based flow path delineation algorithms for urban drainage modelling

GIS Data Conversion. GIS maps are digital not analog. Getting the Map into the Computer

Chapter 4 and 5 solutions

Application of Remotely Sensed Data and Technology to Monitor Land Change in Massachusetts

Transcription:

FOREST MONITORING AND BIOMASS ESTIMATION FOR REDD+ WITH INSAR Svein Solberg, Johannes May, Belachew Gizachew, Wiley Bogren, Johannes Breidenbach Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research GFOI R&D and GOFC-GOLD Land Cover Science Meeting THE HAGUE, 31. Oct. 4. Nov. 2016

InSAR data 2000: SRTM C and X ~2012: TanDEM-X

Step 1: ΔH 1 = DEM TDX DEM SRTM_C 15.11.2016 3

STEP 2: REMOVING ARTEFACTS IN SRTM C-BAND using ANOVA model ΔH 1 = DEM TDX DEM SRTM_C = C artifact + ΔH time + ΔH penetration + e 1 = b 0 + L1 + L2 + B1 + B2 + e 2 15.11.2016 4

ΔH 1 ANOVA RESULTS: R 2 = 0.18 Source DF SS MS F Value Pr > F Belts B1 3 168366515 56122172 10700000 <.0001 Belts B2 3 15617771 5205924 992341 <.0001 Lines L1 814 28974668 35595 6785 <.0001 Lines L2 535 32178017 60146 11465 <.0001 Error 2.07*10 8 1088151112 5 Corrected Total 2.07*10 8 1333288083 ΔH corr1 = ΔH 1 - C artifact C artifact 15.11.2016 5

PENETRATION DIFFERENCE DEPENDING ON FOREST COVER AND LAND COVER TYPE X-band C-band

STEP 3: REMOVING PENETRATION DIFFERENCES AND ARTIFACTS OF SRTM-X using GLM model ΔH 2 = DEM SRTM_X - DEM SRTM_C_corr1 + e 3 = X artifact + ΔH penetration + e 3 = b 0 + XL i + FC*b j + e 3 15.11.2016 7

GLM RESULTS: ΔH 2 R 2 = 0.53 Source DF SS MS F Pr > F XL 2400 956806646 398669 40921 <.0001 forest_cover * Land_cover 8 1347970 168496 17295 <.0001 Error 8.84E+07 861031631 10 Corrected Total 8.84E+07 1819186246 Residual e 3 GLM model: X artifact + ΔH penetration ΔH 2 = b0 + XL i + FC* j + e 3, L1 = 1 km lines 330.2 XLi = X-band errors as lines FC* j = penetration difference per forest 15.11.2016 8

Penetration difference X-C, m, C TO X PENETRATION CORRECTION MODEL 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Forest cover % Evergreen Broadleaf Forest Woody Savanna Savannas Grasslands Permanent Wetlands Croplands Cropland/Natural Vegetation Mosaic others / mixed 15.11.2016 9

MAKING A SIMULATED SRTM X-BAND DEM DEM SRTM_X_sim = DEM SRTM_C - C artifact X artifact Global Forest Cover 2000 (Hansen et al.) MODIS land cover lifting of c-band dem 15.11.2016 10

STEP 4: CHECKING FOR REMAINING BIAS OR RAMP ERRORS 18 728 cells systematically distributed Zero forest cover No forest cover changeno-forest points systematically distributed over Uganda: Average North-South slope East-West slope ΔH 0.9 mm 8 mm 16 mm 15.11.2016 11

STEP 5: VOID FILLING IN STEP TERRAIN (> 30 DEGREES), 1% OF AREA 15.11.2016 12

MEAN HEIGHT CHANGE FOR LANDSAT CHANGE CATEGORIES Land cover type loss no change gain Evergreen Broadleaf Forest -8.8-1.0 0.6 Woody Savanna -3.7-0.1 0.7 Savannas -1.2-0.3 1.8 Grasslands -2.2-0.1-0.4 Permanent Wetlands -3.6 0.1-0.1 Croplands -1.4-0.1 0.8 Cropland/Natural Vegetation Mosaic -3.5-0.3 1.2 others / mixed -3.6 0.4 1.4 For example: Evergreen Broadleaf Forest loss category with Landsat corresponds to 8.8 * 18.4 t/ha/m = 162 t/ha in AGB loss = ca 162 t/ha CO 2 emission Table x. Height change estimates from the ANOVA used for filling of void areas and pixels having unreliable height change estimates 15.11.2016 13

COMPARISON AND SYNERGY WITH LANDSAT: FOREST GROWTH IN PROTECTED AREAS InSAR Landsat 15.11.2016 14

FOREST GROWTH IN PROTECTED AREAS (2) 15.11.2016 15

STEP 6: FROM ΔH TO ΔAGB TO ΔB TO ΔC BIOMASS AGAINST INSAR HEIGHT

Savannahs: Noisy relationships due to differences in stem taper

STEP 7: UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION WITH MONTE CARLO 45 random samples; each containing approximately 4 million pixels (1% of the data) 5 times processing of each sample = 225 processing batches In each processing we varied the correction factors randomly according to their uncertainty Sequential processing aggregating errors through the 5 steps: 1. error removal of C-band SRTM, 2. correction from C to X-band SRTM, 3. replacing voids and extreme, illegal values with values specific the given land cover and forest change category, 4. recalculating ΔH to ΔAGB, 5. expansion of ΔAGB to ΔB, 15.11.2016 18

UGANDA: CHANGE 2000-2012 Forest height decrease 2000 2013: ΔH = 33 cm Corresponding CO 2 emission ΔCO 2 = 27 mill t/year 95% confidence interval = ± 10.5 mill t/year

A NOVEL METHOD FOR DIRECT ESTIMATION OF FOREST CARBON CHANGES: Conventional method E = A EF InSAR method E = A H EF H

CONCLUSIONS SRTM and Tandem-X can be used for estimating 12 year changes as a Reference Emission Level in REDD+, and for forest C stocks at large scale