National Bridge Inspection Program

Similar documents
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) Metrics

Colorado Off-System Bridge Program Description and Guidelines for Selecting Bridges for Rehabilitation or Replacement Funding

CHAPTER 7: QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE ***DRAFT***

Risk - Based Inspection Frequencies

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

Chapter 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION CHAPTER 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION PAGE 33

Review of Recent Bridge Asset Management Systems

Role of Underwater Substructure Inspections in Bridge Management

BRIDGE INSPECTION HANDBOOK. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Engineering

~iffiui ~ Bridge Condition Survey. Inspection Date: 21 May 2003 District: San Angelo County: Tom Green Highway:

NATIONAL BRIDGE INSPECTION PROGRAM COMMENDABLE PRACTICES

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS

Paving Capitalization Work Categories and Treatments

Investigation of Unknown Bridge Foundations in Oregon

Bridge Type Selection

Alberta Transportation Bridge Inspection & Maintenance System (Web 2005) Bridge. Bridge Inspection. Assistant Name Assistant Class

2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.

Bridge Preservation Guide. Maintaining a State of Good Repair Using Cost Effective Investment Strategies

CONCEPTUAL REHABILITATION ALTERNATIVE

OVERVIEW OF TMH19: DRAFT STANDARD FOR THE VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF ROAD STRUCTURES

PONTIS BRIDGE INSPECTION FIELD MANUAL FOR OKLAHOMA BRIDGES OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE DIVISION

Chapter 5 RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 5 RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS PAGE 49

ABOVE ALL, IT S A ROOF SERVICED BY THE JAMES MYERS COMPANY

How To Improve Road Quality

CHAPTER 4 FIELD INSPECTION, DATA COLLECTING, REPORT WRITING AND REPORT REVIEW

Methodology to Identify Preservation Priority Bridges

CIRCULAR LETTER Page 2 of 5 November 30, 2007

3.1 Historical Considerations

Report on Sanctuary/Chancel Crawl Space Inspection. St. John in The Wilderness, 2896 Old Lakeshore Road Bright s Grove. Project No.

CHAPTER FOUR: EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

Public Information & Public Scoping Meeting

VIII. TRANSPORTATION

Building Condition Assessment: West Lexington Street Baltimore, Maryland

Commercial Roof Management

Stone Arch Bridges of Washington County, MD

Structural Failures Cost Lives and Time

NRDCA 400 GUIDELINE FOR FIELD APPLICATION of LIGHTWEIGHT INSULATING CONCRETE REROOFING/RECOVER SYSTEMS

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

Stay Cable Replacement of the Luling Bridge

Commercial Roof Inspection Form

State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS

Self-Home Inspection Checklist

FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1

Page & Turnbull imagining change in historic environments through design, research, and technology

BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL

Building Condition Assessment: North Howard Street Baltimore, Maryland

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

APPENDIX K PIPE INSPECTION

Truss Bridges of Kentucky

National Transportation Safety Board Washington, D.C

Bridge Rehabilitation Alternatives

INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE.

Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Steel Bridges

SIDE SEWER CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS

IV. INDUSTRIAL TRACK DESIGN

Asset Management Performance Report (Asset Management Plan Phase 1)

Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT. Full Metal Jacket Building 0 Prince Street, Alexandria, VA

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

TOWN OF NEW HAVEN ROAD PLAN

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

Beginning on Friday, Jan 22, and on subsequent investigations, the following issues were identified:

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

SECTION 3 ONM & J STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

7. PRINCIPAL STEPS 8. POTENTIAL HAZARDS 9. RECOMMENDED CONTROLS

foot skylight) is enough to knock a worker off their feet. A 10 mph wind gust on a 5 x 6 skylight develops a wind force of 270 lbs.

Alternatives Presentation Meeting Middlebury WCRS(23)

APPENDIX C INLETS. The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.

WSDOT Bridge Elements

RACKING AND ATTACHMENT CRITERIA FOR EFFECTIVE MEMBRANE ROOF SYSTEM INTEGRATION Public Version 1: July 9, 2012

Exterior Elevated Elements Inspection Guidelines

SEWER CLEANING, INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT

RZ Guardrail System Installation Manual

CHAPTER 4 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

LIMITED SCOPE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT REPORT

SELF-INSPECTION CHECKLIST Maintain Your Roof and Identify Potential Issues With Bloom s Comprehensive Self-Inspection Guide

REPORT OF FLOOR ELEVATIONS On Property Located at: Bordeaux Village Dallas TX JOB #11766

Inspection Data for Bridge Asset Management

Property Inspection Report

TITLE: MASONRY PARAPET WALLS AND FLAT ROOF REQUIREMENTS 11/1/09

June 2007 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.0 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.1 GENERAL

Presentation to NYSAMPO, June 2015 Steve Wilcox, P.E., Director, Maintenance Program Planning Bureau NYSDOT

NEOGARD. Preventive Maintenance Manual

National Home Builder - Name Wednesday, August 20, 2014 Regional Customer Care Manager 1234 Main Street Houston, Texas 77067

REVIEW OF AS SCOPE AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES

PELHAM MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL STONE FAÇADE REPORT. November 2007

An Exploratory Data Analysis Of National Bridge Inventory

How To Modernize And Maintain Roads, Highways And Bridges In Maine

Delaware Department of Transportation Bridge Manual

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

Document type: Practice Note Title: External and internal membranes Document number: AC2234 Version: Purpose

Standards Committee T echnical Technical Conference

REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS AGENDA ITEM #III-3 CORTEZ BRIDGE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (PD&E) STUDY

Open House Public Meeting for the Thurmond Bridge Rehabilitation Project State Project: State Project S310-25/ Federal Project: BR-0252(001)D

Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute. Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning Contractors National Association

The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study. Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc.

Transcription:

National Bridge Inspection Program

National Bridge Inspection Program Why? 1967 Silver Bridge collapse (fracture of an eyebar at a pin connection) 1968 National bridge inspection (NBI) program initiated (requiring regular and periodic inspections) 1971 National bridge inspection standards (NBIS) adopted (prescribe how, with what frequency, and by whom bridge inspections must be completed) 1987 Schoharie Creek collapse (scour) 2007 Minnesota I-35W collapse (undersized gusset plate design)

National Bridge Inspection Standards How? When? Who? Visual assessment Collection of 116 standards NBI fields of data collected 75 supplemental state data fields Every 24 months unless otherwise warranted by conditions For non-nbi structures, inspected at least every 60 months Qualified and trained inspectors each having a minimum of 5 years bridge inspection experience Comprehensive two-week inspector training course Fracture critical inspection course

VTrans Inspection Program 2,688 bridges (span length greater than 20 feet) 313 interstate highway 764 state highway 1,606 town highway 5 private or railroad 1,294 bridges (span length greater than or equal to 6 feet and less than or equal to 20 feet) 223 interstate highway 1,071 state highway

VTrans Inspection Program 219 rail bridges (state owned railroads) 253 retaining wall (along state highways having a height greater than 3 feet) 108 recreational path structures (span length greater than 6 feet) 156 overhead sign support structures

Inspection Terms Bridges are considered STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT if significant load-carrying elements are found to be in poor or worse condition due to deterioration and/or damage, or the adequacy of the waterway opening provided is determined to be extremely insufficient. The fact that a bridge is structurally deficient does not immediate imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. Bridges are considered FUNCTIONALLY OBSOLETE when the geometry of the roadway no longer meets today s minimum design standards for width or vertical clearance for that roadway classifications, or the adequacy of the waterway opening provided is determined to be insufficient. The fact that a bridge is functionally obsolete does not imply that it is unsafe.

Inspection Terms The SUFFICIENCY RATING of a bridge is a single number from 0 (low) to 100 (high) taking into account, bridge condition, geometry, traffic, and how well the waterway passes underneath the bridge. Sufficiency rating is used to determine funding eligibility. A low sufficiency rating does not necessarily mean the bridge is unsafe or in need or immediate repair. A FRACTURE CRITICAL MEMBER is a steel member in tension that does not have enough additional, structural members to sufficiently redistribute load in the bridge if one member loses capacity, thus resulting in a portion of or entire bridge collapse. FATIGUE is a material response that describes the tendency of a material to break when subjected to repeated loading.

Structural Deficiencies in Vermont Bridge Age and Structural Deficient Trends 500 100 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 147 0.00 187 236 2.67 1.69 392 6.38 437 15.56 200 20.00 266 23.31 343 349 28.86 34.67 47.06 34 55.56 99 90 < 10 10 and < 20 20 and < 30 30 and < 40 40 and < 50 50 and < 60 60 and < 70 70 and < 80 80 and < 90 90 and < 100 100 Number of Bridges Percent Structurally Deficient in Age Group 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Count SD Age

Types of Inspections Initial The first inspection of a bridge to determine baseline structural conditions Routine Regularly scheduled inspection consisting of observations and/or measurements needed to determine the physical and function condition of the bridge In-Depth A close-up inspection of one or more members to identify deficiencies Special An inspection scheduled at the discretion of the inspector used to monitor a known or suspected deficiency

Types of Inspections Damage Unscheduled inspection to assess structural damage resulting from environmental factors or human actions Fracture critical A hands-on inspection of a fracture critical member Underwater Inspection of the underwater portion of the bridge substructure

National Bridge Inspection Ratings Condition ratings Deck Directly carries traffic Superstructure Supports the deck and connects one substructure element to another Substructure Supports the superstructure and distributes all bridge loads to below-ground bridge footings Culvert A pipe or small structure used for drainage under a highway or railroad

National Bridge Inspection Ratings Appraisal ratings Waterway adequacy (frequency of overtopping) Structural evaluation (load rating) Approach roadway alignment Deck geometry (roadway width) Under clearances (vertical and lateral)

NBI Condition Ratings (scale 9 to 0) 9 Excellent condition 8 Very good condition no problems noted 7 Good condition some minor problems

NBI Condition Ratings (scale 9 to 0) 6 Satisfactory condition structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 Fair condition all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.

NBI Condition Ratings (scale 9 to 0) 4 Poor condition advanced section loss, deterioration or scour Serious condition loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

NBI Condition Ratings (scale 9 to 0) 2 Critical condition advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken

NBI Condition Ratings (scale 9 to 0) 1 Imminent failure condition major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may out back in light service. 0 Failed condition out or service beyond corrective action.

NBI Appraisal Ratings (scale 9 to 0) 9 Superior to present desirable criteria 8 Equal to present desirable criteria 7 Better than present minimum criteria 6 Equal to present minimum criteria 5 Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is

NBI Appraisal Ratings (scale 9 to 0) 4 Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is 3 Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrective action 2 Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement 1 Not used 0 Bridge closed

VTrans Bridge Inspection Charge Four teams consisting of at least one individual meeting the minimum qualifications specified with the National Bridge Inspection Standards http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbis.htm Inspection records and bridge inventories are prepared and maintained in accordance with the standards http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.htm Each structure required to be inspected shall be rated as to its safe load carrying capacity Why aren t all structures rated? Missing information or lack of record plans

VTrans Bridge Inspection Charge Provide technical assistance to bridge owners Provide recommendations to DMV for oversize / overweight movements and routing on interstate and state highways Prepare inspection results and summaries for bridge owners Conduct and develop, with a multidisciplinary team, scour determination and plans of action (POA)

Inspection Results and Summaries For each bridge inspected, a structure inspection, inventory and appraisal sheet will be created and sent to the respective bridge owner (DTA or Selectboard chair) To get a sense of the immediate and future needs, the inspection summary and needs section is key these are the inspectors comments. Don t wait for a special letter.

Preventative Maintenance Why? 1987 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 1991 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 1993 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 1995 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 1996 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 1997 Inspection

Rate of Deterioration? 2001 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 2002 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 2003 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance Why? 2003 Inspection

Preventative Maintenance What? Smooth approaches and wearing surface to reduce impact damages Plug wind slots in concrete curbs and drain off ends of the deck Maintain runner planks on timber decks Maintain a crash worthy rail system on and off the bridge Wash bridges in the spring of every year Apply water repellent every other year on all exposed concrete surfaces

Preventative Maintenance What? Spot paint steel members or grease to protect the steel Keep the bearing areas clean and take measures to reduce debris buildup or moisture on and around the bearings Maintain protective rip-rap countermeasures Monitor for scour after high water events and place concrete sub-footings as needed Maintain leak free roofs and sideboards on covered bridges Maintain deck joints and ensure that they do not leak Remove debris from steel or timber members

Questions? Pamela Maza Thurber, P.E. Bridge Management and Inspection Engineer 1 National Life Drive Structures Section Montpelier, Vermont 05633 Telephone: 828-0041 Fax number: 828-3566 Email: pam.thurber@state.vt.us Thank you