Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for 2000-2011



Similar documents
Titelmasterformat durch Klicken. bearbeiten

High-resolution Regional Reanalyses for Europe and Germany

Application of Numerical Weather Prediction Models for Drought Monitoring. Gregor Gregorič Jožef Roškar Environmental Agency of Slovenia

Interim Progress Report on SEARCH Project: Correction of Systematic Errors in TOVS Radiances

Jessica Blunden, Ph.D., Scientist, ERT Inc., Climate Monitoring Branch, NOAA s National Climatic Data Center

Can latent heat release have a negative effect on polar low intensity?

Validation n 2 of the Wind Data Generator (WDG) software performance. Comparison with measured mast data - Flat site in Northern France

REGIONAL CLIMATE AND DOWNSCALING

Temporal variation in snow cover over sea ice in Antarctica using AMSR-E data product

Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations

IMPACT OF SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY-AMERENUE QUANTUM WEATHER PROJECT MESONET DATA ON WRF-ARW FORECASTS

Development of an Integrated Data Product for Hawaii Climate

Real-time Ocean Forecasting Needs at NCEP National Weather Service

Estimating Firn Emissivity, from 1994 to1998, at the Ski Hi Automatic Weather Station on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Using Passive Microwave Data

What the Heck are Low-Cloud Feedbacks? Takanobu Yamaguchi Rachel R. McCrary Anna B. Harper

ASSESSMENT OF THE CAPABILITY OF WRF MODEL TO ESTIMATE CLOUDS AT DIFFERENT TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL SCALES

Performance Analysis and Application of Ensemble Air Quality Forecast System in Shanghai

Cloud Correction and its Impact on Air Quality Simulations

Distributed Computing. Mark Govett Global Systems Division

Simulating the urban heat island of Greater Houston, Texas

Clouds and the Energy Cycle

Developing sub-domain verification methods based on Geographic Information System (GIS) tools

Supporting Online Material for

Evaluation of clouds in GCMs using ARM-data: A time-step approach

TOPIC: CLOUD CLASSIFICATION

Project Title: Quantifying Uncertainties of High-Resolution WRF Modeling on Downslope Wind Forecasts in the Las Vegas Valley

Numerical weather prediction for the Antarctic & the Arctic

Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS)

Baudouin Raoult, Iryna Rozum, Dick Dee

Data Management Framework for the North American Carbon Program

New, Unique, and Dedicated dataset for the Global Atlas

The Surface Energy Budget

Fundamentals of Climate Change (PCC 587): Water Vapor

Future needs of remote sensing science in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean: A report to support the Horizon Scan activity of COMNAP and SCAR

Data Sets of Climate Science

Radiative effects of clouds, ice sheet and sea ice in the Antarctic

Cloud/Hydrometeor Initialization in the 20-km RUC Using GOES Data

Towards an NWP-testbed

NASA Earth System Science: Structure and data centers

NCDC s SATELLITE DATA, PRODUCTS, and SERVICES

Huai-Min Zhang & NOAAGlobalTemp Team

ESA Climate Change Initiative contributing to the Global Space-based Architecture for Climate Monitoring

Satellite'&'NASA'Data'Intro'

cloud Impacts on Off-Line AQs

SUPERENSEMBLE FORECASTS WITH A SUITE OF MESOSCALE MODELS OVER THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES

Cloud Model Verification at the Air Force Weather Agency

The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) toolkit

Armenian State Hydrometeorological and Monitoring Service

A Project to Create Bias-Corrected Marine Climate Observations from ICOADS

USING SIMULATED WIND DATA FROM A MESOSCALE MODEL IN MCP. M. Taylor J. Freedman K. Waight M. Brower

Financing Community Wind

Stan Benjamin Eric James Haidao Lin Steve Weygandt Susan Sahm Bill Moninger NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO

Comparison of the Vertical Velocity used to Calculate the Cloud Droplet Number Concentration in a Cloud-Resolving and a Global Climate Model

Use of ARM/NSA Data to Validate and Improve the Remote Sensing Retrieval of Cloud and Surface Properties in the Arctic from AVHRR Data

Real-time and Archived Antarctic. Interactive Processing Tools

GCOS science conference, 2 Mar. 2016, Amsterdam. Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)

Observed Cloud Cover Trends and Global Climate Change. Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Simulations of Clouds and Sensitivity Study by Wearther Research and Forecast Model for Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Case 4

IMPACTS OF IN SITU AND ADDITIONAL SATELLITE DATA ON THE ACCURACY OF A SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS FOR CLIMATE

Global Cryosphere Watch (GCW): A WMO Initiative

Analysis of Climatic and Environmental Changes Using CLEARS Web-GIS Information-Computational System: Siberia Case Study

Cloud-Resolving Simulations of Convection during DYNAMO

Meteorological Forecasting of DNI, clouds and aerosols

Long term cloud cover trends over the U.S. from ground based data and satellite products

Simulation of low clouds from the CAM and the regional WRF with multiple nested resolutions

1D shallow convective case studies and comparisons with LES

Potential Climate Impact of Large-Scale Deployment of Renewable Energy Technologies. Chien Wang (MIT)

Climatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula

Arctic Surface, Cloud, and Radiation Properties Based on the AVHRR Polar Pathfinder Dataset. Part I: Spatial and Temporal Characteristics

Monsoon Variability and Extreme Weather Events

Evaluation of precipitation simulated over mid-latitude land by CPTEC AGCM single-column model

PART 1. Representations of atmospheric phenomena

Mode-S Enhanced Surveillance derived observations from multiple Air Traffic Control Radars and the impact in hourly HIRLAM

Validation of ECMWF and NCEP NCAR Reanalysis Data in Antarctica

II. Related Activities

REDUCING UNCERTAINTY IN SOLAR ENERGY ESTIMATES

Long-term Observations of the Convective Boundary Layer (CBL) and Shallow cumulus Clouds using Cloud Radar at the SGP ARM Climate Research Facility

A Description of the 2nd Generation NOAA Global Ensemble Reforecast Data Set

Atmospheric Dynamics of Venus and Earth. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics UCLA 2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Estimation of satellite observations bias correction for limited area model

CERES Edition 2 & Edition 3 Cloud Cover, Cloud Altitude and Temperature

Satellite SST Product Development Proposal

Arctic Cloud Changes from Surface and Satellite Observations

National Snow and Ice Data Center A brief overview and data management projects

Radiative fluxes at high latitudes

Changes in past, present and future sea level, focusing on the Norwegian west coast. J. E. Ø. Nilsen, K. Richter og H. Drange

SOLAR IRRADIANCE FORECASTING, BENCHMARKING of DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES and APPLICATIONS of ENERGY METEOROLOGY

The Arctic Observing Network and its Data Management Challenges Florence Fetterer (NSIDC/CIRES/CU), James A. Moore (NCAR/EOL), and the CADIS team

Report to 8 th session of OOPC. By Dr. Alan R. Thomas, Director, GCOS Secretariat

AMS 2009 Summer Community Meeting Renewable Energy Topic

Various Implementations of a Statistical Cloud Scheme in COSMO model

The ARM-GCSS Intercomparison Study of Single-Column Models and Cloud System Models

Application of global 1-degree data sets to simulate runoff from MOPEX experimental river basins

Daily High-resolution Blended Analyses for Sea Surface Temperature

Data Management for the North American Carbon Program

Possible causes of decreasing cloud cover in the Arctic winter,

Comparative Evaluation of High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Models COSMO-WRF

Near Real Time Blended Surface Winds

A SURVEY OF CLOUD COVER OVER MĂGURELE, ROMANIA, USING CEILOMETER AND SATELLITE DATA

Mapping of Antarctic sea ice in the depletion phase: an indicator of climatic change?

Transcription:

Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for 2000-2011 David H. Bromwich, Lesheng Bai,, Keith Hines, and Sheng-Hung Wang Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University Bill Kuo, Zhiquan Liu, Huiqun Lin and Michael Barlage National Center for Atmospheric Research Mark C. Serreze University of Colorado John E. Walsh University of Illinois ASR Preliminary Meeting Supported by NSF

Outline The Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) ASR Components Atmospheric Data Assimilation Polar WRF Data for ASR ASR-Interim ASR-Interim Results Summary ASR Preliminary Meeting

Arctic System Reanalysis Motivation 1. Rapid change is happening in the Arctic climate system. A comprehensive picture of the interactions is needed. 2. The ASR is using the best available depiction of Arctic processes with improved temporal resolution and much higher spatial resolution than the global reanalyses. 3. A system-oriented approach provides community focus with the atmosphere, land surface and sea ice communities. 4. The ASR provides a convenient synthesis of Arctic field programs (SHEBA, LAII/ATLAS, ARM,...).

ASR Outline A physically-consistent consistent integration of Arctic and other Northern Hemisphere data High resolution in space (10 km) and time (3 hours) Begin with years 2000-2010 2010 (Earth Observing System) Participants: Ohio State University - Byrd Polar Research Center (BPRC) National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) University of Colorado-Boulder University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ohio Supercomputer Center (OSC)

ASR Components The polar-optimized version of the Weather Research and Forecasting model (Polar WRF) which includes an improved Noah land surface model and specifications for the following sea ice attributes: extent, concentration, thickness, albedo and snow cover (Bromwich et al. 2009, Hines et al. 2011, Hines and Bromwich 2008). (http://polarmet.osu.edu/polarmet/pwrf.html) WRF variational data assimilation (WRF-Var), WRF-Var assimilates NCEP-PREPBUFR observation data (in-situ surface and upper air data, remotely sensed retrievals and satellite radiance data). (http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/wrfda/index.html) High Resolution Land Data Assimilation System (HRLDAS) (Chen et al. 2001), HRLDAS is a vital component of ASR that assimilates snow cover and depth, observed vegetation fraction and albedo. The current HRLDAS uses NASA, NESDIS, and NOAA satellite observations to describe these surface properties. ASR Preliminary Meeting

ASR Data Assimilation WRF-3DVar HRLDAS POLAR-WRF RF ASR performed in a 3-h 3 h interval Lateral BCs Boundary Update Lateral Lower BCs Land and Sea Ice Data Init Land Cold Start HRLDAS PREPBUFR data Seasonal dependent Background Error (gen_be) WRF-Var Analysis Analysis output HRLDAS Verification Monitor ASR OUTPUT DFI Forecast output Polar WRF 3h Forecast

Polar WRF (Version 3.3.1) Implementation of a fractional sea ice description in the Noah LSM + variable ice thickness and snow cover Improved treatment of heat transfer for ice sheets and revised surface energy balance calculation in the Noah LSM Model evaluations through Polar WRF simulations over Greenland, the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA site), Alaska, and Antarctica have been performed. Polar WRF is used by ASR.

Numerical and Physics options for Polar WRF Non hydrostatic dynamics; 5th order horizontal advection (upwind-based); 3rd order vertical advection; Positive-definite advection for moisture; 6th-order horizontal hyper diffusion; Grid nudging to ERA-Interim (top 20 levels); Upper damping; Morrison double-moment scheme; New Grell sub-grid scale cumulus scheme; RRTMG atmospheric radiation scheme; RRTMG shortwave scheme; MYNN planetary boundary layer scheme; MYNN surface layer; Noah land surface model; Gravity wave drag; Sea ice.

Data for ASR ERA-Interim reanalysis model level data The T255 (0.7 degrees) horizontal resolution ERA-Interim reanalysis surface and upper air model level data are used to provide the background initial, lateral boundary conditions and statistical background error for the ASR Interim. Atmospheric observation data (3-hour time window) PREPBUFR (including synop, metar, ship, buoy, qscat, sound, airep, profiler, pilot, satob, ssmi_retrieval_sea_surface_wind_speed, ssmi_retrieval_pw, gpspw) Radiances different sensors (amsua, amsub, mhs,hirs3, hirs4) in separate BUFR files GPS (GPSRO, GPSIPW) Obtained from Jack Woollen of NCEP Sea ice data Concentration, thickness, albedo and snow cover. Land data Snow cover, depth and age, vegetation fraction and albedo from NASA, NESDIS, and NOAA satellite observations for High Resolution Land Data Assimilation System (HRLDAS). ASR Preliminary Meeting

ASR-Interim 11 Year Data Assimilation Period: 2000~ 2010 Reduced Resolution: 30km-90km/71L, 10mb top ERA-Interim reanalysis model level data as BC and LB Full 3-hourly cycling run on OSC supercomputers Polar WRF (V3.3.1), WRF-Var (V3.3.1) and HRLDAS are used for the data assimilations.

Domain for ASR-Interim

Near Surface Variable Statistics The data used for the surface statistics: ERA-Interim Surface stations (More than 5000 obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) and Greenland Climate Network (GC-NET))

Average statistics from comparing ASR-Interim and ERA-Interim with observations for 2000-2010 Name 10m Wind Speed 2m-Temperature 2m-Dew point Surface pressure bias rmse corr bias rmse corr bias rmse corr bias rmse corr ASR 0.02 1.93 0.68-0.10 1.72 0.94-0.12 2.07 0.90 0.01 0.90 0.99 ERA 0.42 2.13 0.64 0.32 2.01 0.92 0.27 2.12 0.89 0.00 0.99 0.99

Average statistics from comparing ERA-Interim (ERA) and ASR-Interim (ASR) with observations for 2000-2010 10m Wind Speed RMSE 10m Wind Speed Correlation 2.4 2.3 ERA ASR 0.73 0.71 ERA ASR 2.2 2.1 0.69 0.67 0.65 2 0.63 1.9 1.8 0.61 0.59 0.57 1.7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0.55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Average statistics from comparing ERA-Interim (ERA) and ASR-Interim (ASR) with observations for 2000-2010 2m-temperature RMSE 2m-temperature Correlation ERA ASR 2.3 ERA ASR 0.95 2.2 0.94 2.1 0.93 2 1.9 1.8 0.92 0.91 1.7 0.9 1.6 0.89 1.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0.88 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Average statistics from comparing ERA-Interim (ERA) and ASR-Interim (ASR) with observations for 2000-2010 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2m-Dew point RMSE ERA ASR 0.94 0.92 0.9 2m-Dew point Correlation ERA ASR 2.1 0.88 2 0.86 1.9 1.8 0.84 1.7 0.82 1.6 0.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Average statistics from comparing ERA-Interim (ERA) and ASR-Interim (ASR) with observations for 2000-2010 Surface Pressure RMSE Surface Pressure Correlation 1.15 ERA ASR 0.99 1.1 ERA ASR 1.05 1 0.98 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0.97 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

ASR Data Assimilation Result between ASR-Interim (ERA-Interim) assimilation and observations ASR Preliminary Meeting

ASR Data Assimilation Result between ASR-Interim (ERA-Interim) assimilation and observations ASR Preliminary Meeting

ASR Data Assimilation Result: Polar Low 10 m Wind and Satellite Image 06 h DEC 20, 2007 ASR Preliminary Meeting

ASR Data Assimilation Result: Polar Low 10 m Wind and Satellite Image ASR-Interim ERA-Interim 03h Mar 16, 2007 ASR Preliminary Meeting

ASR Data Assimilation Result: Polar Low 10 m Wind and Satellite Image 18h Jan 12, 2007 ASR Preliminary Meeting

09h Feb 02, 2010 ASR Data Assimilation Result: Arctic Weather System 10 m Wind

One-Month Cycling Run Results Precipitation (Monthly Total in August 2008, Unit: mm) ASR-Interim ASR Preliminary Meeting ERA-Interim

ASR Data Assimilation Result Precipitation ASR-Interim ERA-Interim ERA Yearly Total 2007, Unit: cm ASR Preliminary Meeting

Summary The ASR-Interim data assimilations with reduced resolution with nested grids (90 km outer domain; 30 km primary domain) have been performed from 2000 to 2010 at OSC. The results are very encouraging. Polar WRF, WRF-3DVar and Noah Land Data Assimilation will be updated to correct the bias in Q 2m, T 2m, precipitation and to improve ASR performance, and used for the final run. Based upon the ASR-Interim results and improvement of ASR system, the ASR team will perform 12 years (2000-2011) at 10 km resolution. The target date for completion is September 2012. ASR data are distributed by NCAR's Research Data Archive and NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL).

Average statistics from comparing ASR-Interim and ERA-Interim with observations for 2000-2010 ASR Month 10m Wind Speed 2m-Temperature 2m-Dew point Surface pressure bias rmse corr bias rmse corr bias rmse corr bias rmse corr 01 0.09 2.09 0.70 0.14 1.94 0.94 0.72 2.35 0.92 0.04 0.99 0.99 02 0.03 2.05 0.70-0.03 1.86 0.94 0.50 2.26 0.92 0.03 0.95 0.99 03-0.02 2.04 0.71-0.17 1.75 0.94 0.20 2.19 0.91 0.02 0.93 0.99 04-0.08 1.95 0.70-0.26 1.67 0.94 0.01 2.16 0.89-0.01 0.89 0.99 05-0.07 1.88 0.68-0.27 1.67 0.94-0.38 2.03 0.89-0.02 0.86 0.99 06-0.03 1.79 0.65-0.27 1.69 0.94-0.66 1.98 0.87-0.03 0.84 0.98 07-0.01 1.75 0.63-0.25 1.67 0.93-0.76 1.92 0.85-0.02 0.82 0.98 08 0.02 1.73 0.64-0.24 1.62 0.93-0.82 1.94 0.86-0.02 0.83 0.98 09 0.10 1.80 0.68-0.17 1.58 0.94-0.70 1.91 0.90-0.01 0.86 0.98 10 0.06 1.89 0.70-0.06 1.57 0.94-0.29 1.86 0.91 0.02 0.88 0.99 11 0.03 2.02 0.69 0.09 1.72 0.94 0.17 2.00 0.92 0.04 0.92 0.99 12 0.07 2.10 0.69 0.22 1.92 0.93 0.59 2.27 0.92 0.04 0.98 0.99 AVG 0.02 1.93 0.68-0.10 1.72 0.94-0.12 2.07 0.90 0.01 0.90 0.99 ERAI Month 10m Wind Speed bias rmse corr 2m-Temperature bias rmse 01 0.71 2.35 0.67 0.45 2.26 0.91 0.70 2.43 0.92 0.13 1.11 0.99 02 0.57 2.27 0.67 0.39 2.20 0.92 0.65 2.39 0.91 0.12 1.06 0.99 03 0.41 2.22 0.67 0.31 2.06 0.92 0.52 2.33 0.91 0.05 1.03 0.99 04 0.21 2.11 0.65 0.25 1.99 0.92 0.39 2.25 0.88-0.01 0.97 0.99 05 0.18 2.04 0.62 0.22 1.99 0.92 0.17 2.13 0.87-0.07 0.94 0.98 06 0.21 1.97 0.60 0.23 1.98 0.91-0.05 2.01 0.86-0.13 0.93 0.98 07 0.25 1.93 0.58 0.26 1.95 0.90-0.17 1.91 0.83-0.17 0.92 0.98 08 0.30 1.92 0.59 0.28 1.89 0.90-0.13 1.87 0.84-0.14 0.91 0.98 09 0.46 2.03 0.63 0.28 1.86 0.92 0.01 1.87 0.89-0.05 0.95 0.98 10 0.54 2.15 0.66 0.30 1.84 0.92 0.16 1.87 0.91 0.02 0.96 0.99 11 0.59 2.26 0.66 0.40 1.97 0.92 0.39 2.04 0.92 0.08 1.02 0.99 12 0.66 2.35 0.66 0.46 2.18 0.91 0.63 2.33 0.92 0.13 1.09 0.99 AVG 0.42 2.13 0.64 0.32 2.01 0.92 0.27 2.12 0.89 0.00 0.99 0.99 ASR Preliminary Meeting corr 2m-Dew point bias rmse corr Surface pressure bias rmse corr