CERES Edition 2 & Edition 3 Cloud Cover, Cloud Altitude and Temperature
|
|
|
- Doreen Osborne
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CERES Edition 2 & Edition 3 Cloud Cover, Cloud Altitude and Temperature S. Sun-Mack 1, P. Minnis 2, Y. Chen 1, R. Smith 1, Q. Z. Trepte 1, F. -L. Chang, D. Winker 2 (1) SSAI, Hampton, VA (2) NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA GEWEX Cloud Assessment Meeting, Berlin, Germany June 2010
2 Cloud Cover & Cloud Altitude (Temperature) Cloud Mask - Uses mainly 5 channels (0.65, 2.1, 3.8, 10.8, 12.0 µm) - some assistance from 1.38, 13.3 µm for Aqua - algorithms - Minnis et al., TGRS, 2008 Cloud temperature (Tc) & altitude (Zc, Pc) - Tc requires estimate of optical depth ( ) and emissivity - Minnis et al., TGRS, 2009 (submitted) - yields effective values (radiating temp) - Zc & Pc found using sounding with T(Z) = Tc - Lapse rate is used for boundary layer clouds
3 DATA (1) CALIPSO_ATR_0130 AM PM: (2yrs) (GEWEX) (2) ISCCP_D1_AM PM: (24 yrs) (GEWEX) (3) MODIS-CE_AQU_0130 AM: (6 yrs) (GEWEX) MODIS-CE_AQU_0130 PM: (6 yrs) (GEWEX) MODIS-CE_TER_1030 AM: (8 yrs) (GEWEX) MODIS-CE_TER_1030 PM: (8 yrs) (GEWEX) (4) MODIS-ST_AQU_0130 AM: (7 yrs) (GEWEX) MODIS-ST_AQU_0130 PM: (7 yrs) (GEWEX) MODIS-ST_TER_1030 AM: (9 yrs) (GEWEX) MODIS-ST_TER_1030 PM: (9 yrs) (GEWEX) (5) MODIS-CE_AQU_Ed3 (C3M) 0130 AM PM July 2006-June 2007 (1 yr) (Langley, NASA)
4 C3M product Seiji Kato, Sunny Sun-Mack, Yan Chen, Fred Rose, Walt Miller Funded by the NASA Energy Water Cycle Study (NEWS). Contains: 1. Merged CALIPSO, CloudSat derived clouds, CERES TOA radiative flux (SW, LW, and WN), MODIS-CE (CERES_ST) derived cloud properties both along CALIPSO- CloudSat ground-track and over the whole CERES footprint, 2. MODIS-CE derived cloud properties by an enhanced cloud algorithm, 3. Vertical radiative flux profiles computed with CALIPSO, CloudSat, and MODIS-CE derived cloud properties. Data are available from
5 Cloud Mask
6 Daytime Cloud Mask (Minnis et al., TGRS, 2008) 43% A Test: -T lim = very unlikely brightness temp for scene B Tests: - thresholds above expected clear-sky radiances at 0.65, 3.8, 10.8 µm 20% 20% 17% Thin Ci Tests: - thresholds based on 1.38-µm reflectance & 12-µm temp C Tests: - refined thresholds for 0.65, 3.8, 10.8 µm radiances
7 Night time Cloud Mask (Minnis et al., TGRS, 2008) 45% A Test: -T lim = very unlikely brightness temp for scene D Tests: - thresholds above or below expected clear - sky radiances at 3.8 & 10.8 µm E Tests: - refined thresholds for 3.8, 10.8, 12-µm radiances 25% 31%
8 Comparison Results (CALIPSO-ATR, ISCCP-D1, MODIS-CE, MODIS-ST, MODIS-CE-AQU-Ed3)
9 Ocean, Day + Night
10 Land, Day + Night MODIS-CE_AQU_Ed3
11
12
13
14 Summer,
15 Comparison Results ( CALIPSO and MODIS-CE_Ed3 (C3M) )
16 Cloud Amount, CALIPSO Day Time, C3M MODIS-CE Ed3 Diff of CA (CALIPSO minus MODIS-CE-Ed3) CERES calls dust clouds? CERES over-detect clouds
17 Cloud Amount, CALIPSO Night Time, C3M MODIS-CE Ed3 Diff of CA (CALIPSO minus MODIS-CE-Ed3)
18 Cloud / Clear Detection Agreement between CALIPSO & MODIS-CE_Ed3 ( CALIPSO and MODIS-CE_Ed3 (C3M) )
19 Cloud / Clear Agreement and Disagreement (%) Between CALIPSO and MODIS-CE Ed % 80-90% 60-70% 70-80% Ocean CALIPSO / MDOIS-CE_Ed3
20 Cloud / Clear Agreement and Disagreement (%) Between CALIPSO and MODIS-CE Ed % 70-80% Land
21 Percent of Correct Classification including Clear / Clear and Cloud / Cloud (CALIPSO/MODIS-CE-Ed3) July June 2007, Ed3 MODIS-CE-Ed3 Correct Classification (%) = CALIPSO CA x cld / cld frac + CALIPSO (1-CA) x clr / clr frac Day Time Night Time Zone Ocean Land Ocean Land 60N - 90N N - 60N N - 30S S - 60S S - 90S Global
22 Cloud Detection as a Function of Optical Depth
23 Day Time Ocean C3M Total CALIPSO Detected Cloud Counts = 41,568, % Tau > % Tau =< % 1.5 < Tau < 4
24 Optical Depth Distribution for All CALIPSO Detected Cloud Counts C3M July June 2007 Ocean Land Opt. Depth 41,568,349 17,128,153 Day Time Tau < % % 1.5 < Tau < % 7.28 % Tau > % 32.0 % Ocean Land Opt. Depth 49,496,153 21,067,483 Night Time Tau < % % 1.5 < Tau < % 7.45 % Tau > % %
25 Day Time Tau > 0.1 where CERES Day-Ocean Cloud Detection Probability > 0.67 Ed3 Ocean Ocean Ed3 Land Tau > 0.2 where CERES Day-Land Cloud Detection Probability > 0.67 Land
26 Night Time Tau > 0.15 where CERES Night-Ocean Cloud Detection Probability > 0.67 Ed3 Ocean Ocean Ed3 Land CERES Night-Land Cloud Detection is not sensitive to Tau. Land
27 Day Time Avg~78.3% Avg~72.0% Avg ~ 95.7% (1.5 < Tau < 4) 93.1 % 86.0 % Avg ~ 89.6% (1.5 < Tau < 4)
28 Night Time Avg ~ 90.2% (1.5 < Tau < 4) 87.9 % Avg~70.8% 78.3 % Avg~63.9% Avg ~ 84.8% (1.5 < Tau < 4)
29 Missing Clouds Distribution as a Function of Cloud Height
30 OCEAN Day Time < 4 km Night Time < 4 km > 8 km 4-8 km > 8 km 4-8 km
31 LAND Day Time Night Time < 4 km 4-8 km < 4 km > 8 km 4-8 km > 8 km
32 Non Polar ( 60 S 60 N ) Polar ( 60S 90S, 60N 90N ) High Cloud ( > 8 km) Mid Cloud ( 4-8 km) Low Cloud ( < 4 km) CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Day Time, Ocean, MODIS CE AQU Ed3, July 2006 June 2007
33 Cloud Fraction Summary When cloud fraction is calculated independently (or alone by itself), compared with CALIPSO, CERES (MODIS-CE_ED3) overestimate ~ 3.4 % for day time ocean overestimate ~ 1.6 % for day time land underestimate ~ 7.5 % for night time ocean underestimate ~ 9.5 % for night time land CERES cloud detection optical depth thresholds are: tau: 0.1 for day time ocean tau: 0.2 for day time land tau: 0.15 for night time ocean cloud detection not sensitive to tau until tau > 1.45 for night time land Out of all the missing clouds, 82 % having tau < 1.5, day time ocean 84 % having tau < 1.5, night time ocean 76 % having tau < 1.5, for both day and night, land
34 Cloud Fraction Summary Cont Percent of correct classification including clear/clear and cloud/cloud between CALIPSO and CERES (MODIS-CE_Ed3): 79.70% ocean, day 76.02% land, day 79.28% ocean, night 72.20% land, night main problem is high mis-match for CERES clouds when CALIPSO clear 15.7% ocean, day 27.3% land, day 18.4% ocean, night 30.4% land, night Most of the clouds CERES (MODIS-CE_ed3) misses are low clouds.
35 Cloud Temperature and Height
36 Cloud Effective Temperature and Height (Minnis et al., JCAM, 1985, JAM, 1992; TGRS, 2009 (submitted)) Observed 11-µm radiance: L = (1- L s + L eff Corresponding effective cloud temperature: T eff = B -1 (L eff ) Effective cloud height for high clouds: Z eff = Z(T eff ) Z(T) - sounding from GMAO GEOS 4.03 For low clouds: Z eff = (T eff T o ) / + Z o Z o = surface height above sea level, T o = skin temp, = lapse rate (K/km) is adjusted between 700 & 500 hpa so that T 500 = T 500 (GEOS 4) (Minnis et al., JCAM, 1985, JAM, 1992; TGRS, 2009 (submitted)) For optically thick & water clouds, Z top = Z eff For optically thin ice clouds, Z top = Z(T eff, ) (Minnis et al., JAS, 1991)
37
38
39
40
41 Single Layer ( CALIPSO and MODIS-CE_Ed3 (C3M) )
42 C3M Single Layer
43 Spring (Mar,Apr,May) Lapse Rate (k/km), Ocean (Snow Free), Day Summer (Jun,Jul,Aug) Fall (Sep,Oct,Nov) Winter (Dec,Jan,Feb)
44 Lapse Rate (k/km), Land (Snow Free), Day Time Spring (Mar,Apr,May) Summer (Jun,Jul,Aug) Fall (Sep,Oct,Nov) Winter (Dec,Jan,Feb)
45 C3M Day Ocean: Mean = 0.06 km Stan.Dev = 0.70 km Day Land: Mean = km Stan.Dev = 0.91 km Night Ocean: Mean = 0.01 km Stan.Dev = 0.74 km Night Land: Mean = 0.17 km Stan.Dev = 0.97 km Single Layer Cloud Low Clouds: 0-4 km
46 C3M Day Ocean: Mean = km Stan.Dev = 1.11 km Day Land: Mean = km Stan.Dev = 1.07 km Night Ocean: Mean = km Stan.Dev = 1.16 km Night Land: Mean = km Stan.Dev = 1.24 km Single Layer Cloud Mid Clouds: 4-8 km
47 C3M Day Ocean: Mean = 0.96 km Stan.Dev = 1.53 km Day Land: Mean = 0.51 km Stan.Dev = 1.51 km Single Layer Cloud Night Ocean: Mean = 0.79 km Stan.Dev = 1.69 km Night Land: Mean = 0.70 km Stan.Dev = 1.95 km High Clouds: 8-20 km
48 Multilayer (ice over water) MODIS-CE Edition 3: - only detects multilayer clouds when upper cloud < 4 - Chang et al., JGR 2009 (in press), for retrieval technique
49 CALIPSO Upper Layer CERES Upper Layer CALIPSO Lower Layer CERES Lower Layer Day, Summer
50 Ocean Land Day Summer Mean cloud top height difference (CALIPSO -MODIS-CE-Ed3) (km) Hgt Diff Upper Layer Lower Layer (km) Ocean Land Ocean Land Global Polar NonPolar
51 Summary & Future Single layer: CERES cloud top heights agree with CALIPSO within ~ 50 meter for low and mid clouds ~ 1 km for high clouds (CERES is lower) cloud top Multilayer: CERES clouds top heights agree with CALIPSO within ~ 1 km for upper layer (CERES is lower) ~ 2 km for lower layer (CERES is lower)
52 Backup Slides
53 CERES Cloud Processing NPP VIIRS CID MODIS Aqua CID MODIS Terra CID TRMM VIRS CID GMAO GEOS4 Cloud Imager Data (CID) CERES Clouds Processor To CERES Convolution ECV EIPD (Cookie Dough) EQCG EQCB ECVS Output (pixel level & 1 deg) Snow / Ice Maps Emissivity Maps x 4 IGBP Water % Elevation Surface Maps Algorithm Ancillaries Snow/ice Models BiDir Models Directional Models Angular Models Clear Sky Albedo History
54 Clear-sky albedos: - early AVHRR/MODIS analyses (Sun-Mack et al., AMS, 2004) Sfc emissivity: - early AVHRR/MODIS analyses (Chen et al., AMS, 2004) Skin temperature: - GMAO GEOS 4 3-hourly Atmos profiles: -GMAO GEOS 4 1 deg, 52 levels, 6 hourly Snow and Ice surface data: -NESDIS, 25-km daily maps, interpolated to 10 min grid.
55 Day Time Ocean: Cloud Amount Difference (CALIPSO - CERES) = (global) = (polar) = (non-polar) Land: Cloud Amount Difference (CALIPSO - CERES) = (global) = (polar) = (non-polar)
56 Night Time Ocean: Cloud Amount Difference (CALIPSO - CERES) = (global) = (polar) = (non-polar) Land: Cloud Amount Difference (CALIPSO - CERES) = (global) = (polar) = (non-polar)
57 ) Cloud Amount Land Summer Low ( P > 680 hpa) Middle ( 440< P <680 hpa) High (P <440hPa Latitude (deg)
58 How to improve low cloud detection for > 0.2? Tighten thresholds Daytime, use high resolution (e.g., 250-m) VIS channels to detect subpixel cloud cover Use additional channels (8.5, 13.3 µm)
59 Non Polar ( 60 S 60 N ) Polar ( 60S 90S, 60N 90N ) High Cloud ( > 8 km) Mid Cloud ( 4-8 km) Low Cloud ( < 4 km) CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Day Time, Land, MODIS CE AQU Ed3, July 2006 June 2007
60 Non Polar ( 60 S 60 N ) Polar ( 60S 90S, 60N 90N ) High Cloud ( > 8 km) Mid Cloud ( 4-8 km) Low Cloud ( < 4 km) CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Night Time, Ocean, MODIS CE AQU Ed3, July 2006 June 2007
61 Non Polar ( 60 S 60 N ) Polar ( 60S 90S, 60N 90N ) High Cloud ( > 8 km) Mid Cloud ( 4-8 km) Low Cloud ( < 4 km) CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear CERES Calipso Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Cloudy Clear Night Time, Land, MODIS CE AQU Ed3, July 2006 June 2007
62 CERES Cloud-base Height Estimation Cloud thickness: f(phase, T eff, based on surface & aircraft radar/lidar data Cloud base Height: Z base = Z top - Constraint: Z base > Z o (Minnis et al., JAS, 1991; JAM 1992, TGRS, 2009; Chakrapani, ARM 2002)
63 Lapse Rate Calculation C3M: Merged CALIPSO and CERES Clouds CALIPSO (1) Single Layer (2) Transparent Clouds (3) Cloud Top Height: Z top CERES-MODIS (1) Water Clouds (2) Cloud Top Temp: T top (3) T skin, for Ocean (4) T sfc-24h-mean for Land (5) Z sfc, Surface Height Z top - Z sfc < 5 km Lapse Rate = (T top -T skin ) / (Z top -Z sfc ) < For Ocean Lapse Rate = (T top -T sfc-24h-mean ) / (Z top -Z sfc ) < For Land
CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES, and MODIS Merged Data Product
CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES, and MODIS Merged Data Product Seiji Kato 1, Sunny Sun-Mack 2, Walter F. Miller 2, Fred G. Rose 2, and Victor E. Sothcott 2 1 NASA Langley Research Center 2 Science and Systems
GOES-R AWG Cloud Team: ABI Cloud Height
GOES-R AWG Cloud Team: ABI Cloud Height June 8, 2010 Presented By: Andrew Heidinger 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR 1 Outline Executive Summary Algorithm Description ADEB and IV&V Response Summary Requirements Specification
Surface Atmosphere Radia3on Budget (SARB) working group update
Surface Atmosphere Radia3on Budget (SARB) working group update Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, David A. Rutan 2, Alexander Radkevich 2, Thomas E. Caldwell 2, Antonio Viudez- Mora 2, Seung Hee Ham 2, and
Cloud Masking and Cloud Products
Cloud Masking and Cloud Products MODIS Operational Algorithm MOD35 Paul Menzel, Steve Ackerman, Richard Frey, Kathy Strabala, Chris Moeller, Liam Gumley, Bryan Baum MODIS Cloud Masking Often done with
Advances in Cloud Imager Remote Sensing
Advances in Cloud Imager Remote Sensing Andrew Heidinger NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Madison, Wisconsin With material from Mike Pavolonis, Robert Holz, Amato Evan and Fred Nagle STAR Science Symposium November 9,
Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using CALIOP
Click Here for Full Article JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 113,, doi:10.1029/2008jd009837, 2008 Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation
How To Understand Cloud Properties From Satellite Imagery
P1.70 NIGHTTIME RETRIEVAL OF CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES FOR GOES-R Patrick W. Heck * Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin P.
Validation of SEVIRI cloud-top height retrievals from A-Train data
Validation of SEVIRI cloud-top height retrievals from A-Train data Chu-Yong Chung, Pete N Francis, and Roger Saunders Contents Introduction MO GeoCloud AVAC-S Long-term monitoring Comparison with OCA Summary
Measurement of the effect of biomass burning aerosol on inhibition of cloud formation over the Amazon
Supporting Online Material for Koren et al. Measurement of the effect of biomass burning aerosol on inhibition of cloud formation over the Amazon 1. MODIS new cloud detection algorithm The operational
Cloud detection and clearing for the MOPITT instrument
Cloud detection and clearing for the MOPITT instrument Juying Warner, John Gille, David P. Edwards and Paul Bailey National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado ABSTRACT The Measurement Of
SAFNWC/MSG Cloud type/height. Application for fog/low cloud situations
SAFNWC/MSG Cloud type/height. Application for fog/low cloud situations 22 September 2011 Hervé LE GLEAU, Marcel DERRIEN Centre de météorologie Spatiale. Lannion Météo-France 1 Fog or low level clouds?
A review of cloud top height and optical depth histograms from MISR, ISCCP, and MODIS
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:10.1029/2009jd013422, 2010 A review of cloud top height and optical depth histograms from MISR, ISCCP, and MODIS Roger Marchand, 1 Thomas Ackerman, 1 Mike
Radiative effects of clouds, ice sheet and sea ice in the Antarctic
Snow and fee Covers: Interactions with the Atmosphere and Ecosystems (Proceedings of Yokohama Symposia J2 and J5, July 1993). IAHS Publ. no. 223, 1994. 29 Radiative effects of clouds, ice sheet and sea
MSG-SEVIRI cloud physical properties for model evaluations
Rob Roebeling Weather Research Thanks to: Hartwig Deneke, Bastiaan Jonkheid, Wouter Greuell, Jan Fokke Meirink and Erwin Wolters (KNMI) MSG-SEVIRI cloud physical properties for model evaluations Cloud
Launch-Ready Operations Code Chain ESDT ShortNames, LongNames, and Generating PGE or Ingest Source
Launch-Ready Operations Code Chain ESDT ShortNames, LongNames, and Generating PGE or Ingest Source Generating PGE Name/Description or Ingest Source Product ESDT ShortName Product ESDT LongName NPP_VMAE_L1
Remote Sensing of Contrails and Aircraft Altered Cirrus Clouds
Remote Sensing of Contrails and Aircraft Altered Cirrus Clouds R. Palikonda 1, P. Minnis 2, L. Nguyen 1, D. P. Garber 1, W. L. Smith, r. 1, D. F. Young 2 1 Analytical Services and Materials, Inc. Hampton,
3.4 Cryosphere-related Algorithms
3.4 Cryosphere-related Algorithms GLI Algorithm Description 3.4.-1 3.4.1 CTSK1 A. Algorithm Outline (1) Algorithm Code: CTSK1 (2) Product Code: CLFLG_p (3) PI Name: Dr. Knut Stamnes (4) Overview of Algorithm
A comparison of NOAA/AVHRR derived cloud amount with MODIS and surface observation
A comparison of NOAA/AVHRR derived cloud amount with MODIS and surface observation LIU Jian YANG Xiaofeng and CUI Peng National Satellite Meteorological Center, CMA, CHINA outline 1. Introduction 2. Data
Improving Low-Cloud Simulation with an Upgraded Multiscale Modeling Framework
Improving Low-Cloud Simulation with an Upgraded Multiscale Modeling Framework Kuan-Man Xu and Anning Cheng NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia Motivation and outline of this talk From Teixeira
2. VIIRS SDR Tuple and 2Dhistogram MIIC Server-side Filtering. 3. L2 CERES SSF OPeNDAP dds structure (dim_alias and fixed_dim)
MIIC Server-side Filtering Outline 1. DEMO Web User Interface (leftover from last meeting) 2. VIIRS SDR Tuple and 2Dhistogram MIIC Server-side Filtering 3. L2 CERES SSF OPeNDAP dds structure (dim_alias
Total radiative heating/cooling rates.
Lecture. Total radiative heating/cooling rates. Objectives:. Solar heating rates.. Total radiative heating/cooling rates in a cloudy atmosphere.. Total radiative heating/cooling rates in different aerosol-laden
Physical properties of mesoscale high-level cloud systems in relation to their atmospheric environment deduced from Sounders
Physical properties of mesoscale high-level cloud systems in relation to their atmospheric environment deduced from Sounders Claudia Stubenrauch, Sofia Protopapadaki, Artem Feofilov, Theodore Nicolas &
Evaluations of the CALIPSO Cloud Optical Depth Algorithm Through Comparisons with a GOES Derived Cloud Analysis
Generated using V3.0 of the official AMS LATEX template Evaluations of the CALIPSO Cloud Optical Depth Algorithm Through Comparisons with a GOES Derived Cloud Analysis Katie Carbonari, Heather Kiley, and
Studying cloud properties from space using sounder data: A preparatory study for INSAT-3D
Studying cloud properties from space using sounder data: A preparatory study for INSAT-3D Munn V. Shukla and P. K. Thapliyal Atmospheric Sciences Division Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Group Space Applications
Validating MOPITT Cloud Detection Techniques with MAS Images
Validating MOPITT Cloud Detection Techniques with MAS Images Daniel Ziskin, Juying Warner, Paul Bailey, John Gille National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 ABSTRACT The
Cloud Thickness Estimation from GOES-8 Satellite Data Over the ARM-SGP Site
Cloud Thickness Estimation from GOES-8 Satellite Data Over the ARM-SGP Site V. Chakrapani, D. R. Doelling, and A. D. Rapp Analytical Services and Materials, Inc. Hampton, Virginia P. Minnis National Aeronautics
Satellite Products and Dissemination: Visualization and Data Access
Satellite Products and Dissemination: Visualization and Data Access Gregory Leptoukh GES DISC, NASA GSFC Dana Ostrenga GES DISC, NASA GSFC Introduction The Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services
Denis Botambekov 1, Andrew Heidinger 2, Andi Walther 1, and Nick Bearson 1
Denis Botambekov 1, Andrew Heidinger 2, Andi Walther 1, and Nick Bearson 1 1 - CIMSS / SSEC / University of Wisconsin Madison, WI, USA 2 NOAA / NESDIS / STAR @ University of Wisconsin Madison, WI, USA
Continental and Marine Low-level Cloud Processes and Properties (ARM SGP and AZORES) Xiquan Dong University of North Dakota
Continental and Marine Low-level Cloud Processes and Properties (ARM SGP and AZORES) Xiquan Dong University of North Dakota Outline 1) Statistical results from SGP and AZORES 2) Challenge and Difficult
Evaluation of the Effect of Upper-Level Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Retrievals of Low-Level Cloud Droplet Effective Radius
Evaluation of the Effect of Upper-Level Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Retrievals of Low-Level Cloud Droplet Effective Radius F.-L. Chang and Z. Li Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center University
Comparison of Cloud and Radiation Variability Reported by Surface Observers, ISCCP, and ERBS
Comparison of Cloud and Radiation Variability Reported by Surface Observers, ISCCP, and ERBS Joel Norris (SIO/UCSD) Cloud Assessment Workshop April 5, 2005 Outline brief satellite data description upper-level
How to Use the NOAA Enterprise Cloud Mask (ECM) Andrew Heidinger, Tom Kopp, Denis Botambekov and William Straka JPSS Cloud Team August 29, 2015
How to Use the NOAA Enterprise Cloud Mask (ECM) Andrew Heidinger, Tom Kopp, Denis Botambekov and William Straka JPSS Cloud Team August 29, 2015 Outline Describe ECM and its differences to VCM Describe
Comparison of NOAA's Operational AVHRR Derived Cloud Amount to other Satellite Derived Cloud Climatologies.
Comparison of NOAA's Operational AVHRR Derived Cloud Amount to other Satellite Derived Cloud Climatologies. Sarah M. Thomas University of Wisconsin, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies
The Next Generation Flux Analysis: Adding Clear-Sky LW and LW Cloud Effects, Cloud Optical Depths, and Improved Sky Cover Estimates
The Next Generation Flux Analysis: Adding Clear-Sky LW and LW Cloud Effects, Cloud Optical Depths, and Improved Sky Cover Estimates C. N. Long Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington
The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service
The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service Introduction DLR and Transvalor are preparing a new Web service to disseminate the statistics of the APOLLO cloud physical parameters as a further help in
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Cloud Fraction Technical Document
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Cloud Fraction Technical Document 1. Intent of This Document This document is intended for users who wish to compare satellite-derived observations
Towards assimilating IASI satellite observations over cold surfaces - the cloud detection aspect
Towards assimilating IASI satellite observations over cold surfaces - the cloud detection aspect Tuuli Perttula, FMI + Thanks to: Nadia Fourrié, Lydie Lavanant, Florence Rabier and Vincent Guidard, Météo
Multiangle cloud remote sensing from
Multiangle cloud remote sensing from POLDER3/PARASOL Cloud phase, optical thickness and albedo F. Parol, J. Riedi, S. Zeng, C. Vanbauce, N. Ferlay, F. Thieuleux, L.C. Labonnote and C. Cornet Laboratoire
STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Beta Review. Suomi NPP Surface Reflectance IP ARP Product
STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Beta Review Suomi NPP Surface Reflectance IP ARP Product Alexei Lyapustin Surface Reflectance Cal Val Team 11/26/2012 STAR ADP Surface Reflectance ARP Team Member
Microwave observations in the presence of cloud and precipitation
Microwave observations in the presence of cloud and precipitation Alan Geer Thanks to: Bill Bell, Peter Bauer, Fabrizio Baordo, Niels Bormann Slide 1 ECMWF/EUMETSAT satellite course 2015: Microwave 2 Slide
DISCRIMINATING CLEAR-SKY FROM CLOUD WITH MODIS ALGORITHM THEORETICAL BASIS DOCUMENT (MOD35) MODIS Cloud Mask Team
DISCRIMINATING CLEAR-SKY FROM CLOUD WITH MODIS ALGORITHM THEORETICAL BASIS DOCUMENT (MOD35) MODIS Cloud Mask Team Steve Ackerman, Richard Frey, Kathleen Strabala, Yinghui Liu, Liam Gumley, Bryan Baum,
Obtaining and Processing MODIS Data
Obtaining and Processing MODIS Data MODIS is an extensive program using sensors on two satellites that each provide complete daily coverage of the earth. The data have a variety of resolutions; spectral,
The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service
The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service Introduction DLR and Transvalor are preparing a new Web service to disseminate the statistics of the APOLLO cloud physical parameters as a further help in
The Surface Energy Budget
The Surface Energy Budget The radiation (R) budget Shortwave (solar) Radiation Longwave Radiation R SW R SW α α = surface albedo R LW εσt 4 ε = emissivity σ = Stefan-Boltzman constant T = temperature Subsurface
FRESCO. Product Specification Document FRESCO. Authors : P. Wang, R.J. van der A (KNMI) REF : TEM/PSD2/003 ISSUE : 3.0 DATE : 30.05.
PAGE : 1/11 TITLE: Product Specification Authors : P. Wang, R.J. van der A (KNMI) PAGE : 2/11 DOCUMENT STATUS SHEET Issue Date Modified Items / Reason for Change 0.9 19.01.06 First Version 1.0 22.01.06
Satellite remote sensing using AVHRR, ATSR, MODIS, METEOSAT, MSG
Satellite remote sensing using AVHRR, ATSR, MODIS, METEOSAT, MSG Ralf Meerkötter, Luca Bugliaro, Knut Dammann, Gerhard Gesell, Christine König, Waldemar Krebs, Hermann Mannstein, Bernhard Mayer, presented
Impact of dataset choice on calculations of the short-term cloud feedback
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: ATMOSPHERES, VOL. 118, 2821 2826, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50199, 2013 Impact of dataset choice on calculations of the short-term cloud feedback A. E. Dessler 1 and N.G. Loeb 2
Assessing Cloud Spatial and Vertical Distribution with Infrared Cloud Analyzer
Assessing Cloud Spatial and Vertical Distribution with Infrared Cloud Analyzer I. Genkova and C. N. Long Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington T. Besnard ATMOS SARL Le Mans, France
Remote Sensing of Clouds from Polarization
Remote Sensing of Clouds from Polarization What polarization can tell us about clouds... and what not? J. Riedi Laboratoire d'optique Atmosphérique University of Science and Technology Lille / CNRS FRANCE
DISCRIMINATING CLEAR-SKY FROM CLOUD WITH MODIS ALGORITHM THEORETICAL BASIS DOCUMENT (MOD35) MODIS Cloud Mask Team
DISCRIMINATING CLEAR-SKY FROM CLOUD WITH MODIS ALGORITHM THEORETICAL BASIS DOCUMENT (MOD35) MODIS Cloud Mask Team Steve Ackerman 1, Kathleen Strabala 1, Paul Menzel 1,2, Richard Frey 1, Chris Moeller 1,
Clouds and the Energy Cycle
August 1999 NF-207 The Earth Science Enterprise Series These articles discuss Earth's many dynamic processes and their interactions Clouds and the Energy Cycle he study of clouds, where they occur, and
NOAA flight planning support and satellite aerosol and cloud retrieval validation during TORERO
NOAA flight planning support and satellite aerosol and cloud retrieval validation during TORERO R. Bradley Pierce and Andrew Heidinger NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Allen Lenzen 1, Todd Schaack 1, Ryan Spackman 2,
Sensitivity of Surface Cloud Radiative Forcing to Arctic Cloud Properties
Sensitivity of Surface Cloud Radiative Forcing to Arctic Cloud Properties J. M. Intrieri National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Environmental Technology Laboratory Boulder, Colorado M. D. Shupe
REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUD-AEROSOL RADIATIVE EFFECTS FROM SATELLITE DATA: A CASE STUDY OVER THE SOUTH OF PORTUGAL
REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUD-AEROSOL RADIATIVE EFFECTS FROM SATELLITE DATA: A CASE STUDY OVER THE SOUTH OF PORTUGAL D. Santos (1), M. J. Costa (1,2), D. Bortoli (1,3) and A. M. Silva (1,2) (1) Évora Geophysics
ARM SWS to study cloud drop size within the clear-cloud transition zone
ARM SWS to study cloud drop size within the clear-cloud transition zone (GSFC) Yuri Knyazikhin Boston University Christine Chiu University of Reading Warren Wiscombe GSFC Thanks to Peter Pilewskie (UC)
Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations
Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations S. C. Xie, R. T. Cederwall, and J. J. Yio Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California M. H. Zhang
Cloud Radiation and the Law of Attraction
Convec,on, cloud and radia,on Convection redistributes the thermal energy yielding (globally-averaged), a mean lapse rate of ~ -6.5 o C/km. Radiative processes tend to produce a more negative temperature
What the Heck are Low-Cloud Feedbacks? Takanobu Yamaguchi Rachel R. McCrary Anna B. Harper
What the Heck are Low-Cloud Feedbacks? Takanobu Yamaguchi Rachel R. McCrary Anna B. Harper IPCC Cloud feedbacks remain the largest source of uncertainty. Roadmap 1. Low cloud primer 2. Radiation and low
GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document For Low Cloud and Fog
NOAA NESDIS CENTER for SATELLITE APPLICATIONS and RESEARCH GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document For Low Cloud and Fog Corey Calvert, UW/CIMSS Mike Pavolonis, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
VIIRS-CrIS mapping. NWP SAF AAPP VIIRS-CrIS Mapping
NWP SAF AAPP VIIRS-CrIS Mapping This documentation was developed within the context of the EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP SAF), under the Cooperation Agreement
A SURVEY OF CLOUD COVER OVER MĂGURELE, ROMANIA, USING CEILOMETER AND SATELLITE DATA
Romanian Reports in Physics, Vol. 66, No. 3, P. 812 822, 2014 ATMOSPHERE PHYSICS A SURVEY OF CLOUD COVER OVER MĂGURELE, ROMANIA, USING CEILOMETER AND SATELLITE DATA S. STEFAN, I. UNGUREANU, C. GRIGORAS
Volcanic Ash Monitoring: Product Guide
Doc.No. Issue : : EUM/TSS/MAN/15/802120 v1a EUMETSAT Eumetsat-Allee 1, D-64295 Darmstadt, Germany Tel: +49 6151 807-7 Fax: +49 6151 807 555 Date : 2 June 2015 http://www.eumetsat.int WBS/DBS : EUMETSAT
Evaluating GCM clouds using instrument simulators
Evaluating GCM clouds using instrument simulators University of Washington September 24, 2009 Why do we care about evaluation of clouds in GCMs? General Circulation Models (GCMs) project future climate
The NASA NEESPI Data Portal to Support Studies of Climate and Environmental Changes in Non-boreal Europe
The NASA NEESPI Data Portal to Support Studies of Climate and Environmental Changes in Non-boreal Europe Suhung Shen NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/George Mason University Gregory Leptoukh, Tatiana Loboda,
Ocean Level-3 Standard Mapped Image Products June 4, 2010
Ocean Level-3 Standard Mapped Image Products June 4, 2010 1.0 Introduction This document describes the specifications of Ocean Level-3 standard mapped archive products that are produced and distributed
Observed Cloud Cover Trends and Global Climate Change. Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Observed Cloud Cover Trends and Global Climate Change Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography Increasing Global Temperature from www.giss.nasa.gov Increasing Greenhouse Gases from ess.geology.ufl.edu
Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for 2000-2011
Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for 2000-2011 David H. Bromwich, Lesheng Bai,, Keith Hines, and Sheng-Hung Wang Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University
Chapter 6: Cloud Development and Forms
Chapter 6: Cloud Development and Forms (from The Blue Planet ) Why Clouds Form Static Stability Cloud Types Why Clouds Form? Clouds form when air rises and becomes saturated in response to adiabatic cooling.
The Balance of Power in the Earth-Sun System
NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration www.nasa.gov The Balance of Power in the Earth-Sun System The Sun is the major source of energy for Earth s oceans, atmosphere, land, and biosphere.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Peter Pilewskie University of Colorado, ATOC/LASP
163 ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND REMOTELY SENSED TEMPERATURE OBSERVATIONS
ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND REMOTELY SENSED TEMPERATURE OBSERVATIONS Rita Pongrácz *, Judit Bartholy, Enikő Lelovics, Zsuzsanna Dezső Eötvös Loránd University,
Ecosystem-land-surface-BL-cloud coupling as climate changes
Ecosystem-land-surface-BL-cloud coupling as climate changes Alan K. Betts Atmospheric Research, [email protected] CMMAP August 19, 2009 Outline of Talk Land-surface climate: - surface, BL & cloud coupling
16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting. Plymouth, UK 15 17 February 2011. mission: Present status and near future
16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting Plymouth, UK 15 17 February 2011 The Meteor 3M Mt satellite mission: Present status and near future plans MISSION AIMS Satellites of the series METEOR M M are purposed
Satellite'&'NASA'Data'Intro'
Satellite'&'NASA'Data'Intro' Research'vs.'Opera8ons' NASA':'Research'satellites' ' ' NOAA/DoD:'Opera8onal'Satellites' NOAA'Polar'Program:'NOAA>16,17,18,19,NPP' Geosta8onary:'GOES>east,'GOES>West' DMSP'series:'SSM/I,'SSMIS'
Amy K. Huff Battelle Memorial Institute [email protected] BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1
Using NASA Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth Data to Create Representative PM 2.5 Fields for Use in Human Health and Epidemiology Studies in Support of State and National Environmental Public Health Tracking
Assimilation of cloudy infrared satellite observations: The Met Office perspective
Assimilation of cloudy infrared satellite observations: The Met Office perspective Ed Pavelin, Met Office International Symposium on Data Assimilation 2014, Munich Contents This presentation covers the
Estimating Firn Emissivity, from 1994 to1998, at the Ski Hi Automatic Weather Station on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Using Passive Microwave Data
Estimating Firn Emissivity, from 1994 to1998, at the Ski Hi Automatic Weather Station on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Using Passive Microwave Data Mentor: Dr. Malcolm LeCompte Elizabeth City State University
