Saturation vapor pressure formulations

Similar documents
Vapor Pressure Measurement of Supercooled Water

The Relationship between Relative Humidity and the Dewpoint Temperature in Moist Air A Simple Conversion and Applications

THE HUMIDITY/MOISTURE HANDBOOK

THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES HUMID AIR

CHAPTER 14 THE CLAUSIUS-CLAPEYRON EQUATION

Benefits accruing from GRUAN

Page 1. Weather Unit Exam Pre-Test Questions

Water vapour and greenhouse effect

Primary Standards for Humidity

Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations

Description of zero-buoyancy entraining plume model

How do I measure the amount of water vapor in the air?

Humidity, Condensation, Clouds, and Fog. Water in the Atmosphere

We will study the temperature-pressure diagram of nitrogen, in particular the triple point.

The Next Generation Flux Analysis: Adding Clear-Sky LW and LW Cloud Effects, Cloud Optical Depths, and Improved Sky Cover Estimates

Chapter 18 Temperature, Heat, and the First Law of Thermodynamics. Problems: 8, 11, 13, 17, 21, 27, 29, 37, 39, 41, 47, 51, 57

IAPWS Certified Research Need - ICRN

Chapter 12 - Liquids and Solids

Turbulent mixing in clouds latent heat and cloud microphysics effects

A new positive cloud feedback?

CHEM 120 Online Chapter 7

Temperature and Humidity

Guidelines on Quality Control Procedures for Data from Automatic Weather Stations

HAY MOISTURE & WEATHER:

Storms Short Study Guide

IMPROVING THE USEFULNESS OF OPERATIONAL RADIOSONDE DATA

Chapter 4 Practice Quiz

Tephigrams: What you need to know

How To Model An Ac Cloud

Using Cloud-Resolving Model Simulations of Deep Convection to Inform Cloud Parameterizations in Large-Scale Models

Water, Phase Changes, Clouds

Moisture Control. It s The Dew Point. Stupid! Its not the humidity.

EXPLANATION OF WEATHER ELEMENTS AND VARIABLES FOR THE DAVIS VANTAGE PRO 2 MIDSTREAM WEATHER STATION

Name Class Date. In the space provided, write the letter of the term or phrase that best completes each statement or best answers each question.

Super Heated Steam Drying of Wood on Industrial Scale

Humidity the story for teachers

Climate Models: Uncertainties due to Clouds. Joel Norris Assistant Professor of Climate and Atmospheric Sciences Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Evaluation of the Effect of Upper-Level Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Retrievals of Low-Level Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

Fundamentals of Climate Change (PCC 587): Water Vapor

Chemistry 13: States of Matter

CHEMISTRY. Matter and Change. Section 13.1 Section 13.2 Section The Gas Laws The Ideal Gas Law Gas Stoichiometry

Improvement in the Assessment of SIRS Broadband Longwave Radiation Data Quality

Harvard wet deposition scheme for GMI

Case study Realistic and best uncertainties with humidity instruments

WHAT HAPPENS TO WATER ABSORBENT MATERIALS BELOW ZERO DEGREES?

States of Matter CHAPTER 10 REVIEW SECTION 1. Name Date Class. Answer the following questions in the space provided.

Fog and Cloud Development. Bows and Flows of Angel Hair

The Ideal Gas Law. Gas Constant. Applications of the Gas law. P = ρ R T. Lecture 2: Atmospheric Thermodynamics

= atm. 760 mm Hg. = atm. d. 767 torr = 767 mm Hg. = 1.01 atm

Coupling Forced Convection in Air Gaps with Heat and Moisture Transfer inside Constructions

Total Heat Versus Sensible Heat Evaporator Selection Methods & Application

HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE Vol. II - Formation of Precipitation - L.T. Matveev, Yu. L. Matveev

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Markus Peer Rumpfkeil

Improved diagnosis of low-level cloud from MSG SEVIRI data for assimilation into Met Office limited area models

Estimation of satellite observations bias correction for limited area model

Comparison and Selection of EMC/ERH Isotherm Equations for Drying and Storage of Grain and Oilseed

Lecture 1: A Brief Survey of the Atmosphere

Convective Clouds. Convective clouds 1

Stratosphere-Troposphere Exchange in the Tropics. Masatomo Fujiwara Hokkaido University, Japan (14 March 2006)

PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL PROCESSES OF CLOUD ACTIVATION STUDIED WITH A DESKTOP CLOUD MODEL

UCAR Trustee Candidate Kenneth Bowman

UNIT 6a TEST REVIEW. 1. A weather instrument is shown below.

CHAPTER 12. Gases and the Kinetic-Molecular Theory

This chapter discusses: 1. Definitions and causes of stable and unstable atmospheric air. 2. Processes that cause instability and cloud development

Cloud Development and Forms. LIFTING MECHANISMS 1. Orographic 2. Frontal 3. Convergence 4. Convection. Orographic Cloud. The Orographic Cloud

13.1 The Nature of Gases. What is Kinetic Theory? Kinetic Theory and a Model for Gases. Chapter 13: States of Matter. Principles of Kinetic Theory

Some generalization of Langmuir adsorption isotherm

Purpose: To determine the dew and point and relative humidity in the classroom, and find the current relative humidity outside.

ASHRAE Climatic Data Activities. Dru Crawley Didier Thevenard

Clouds, Fog, & Precipitation

QUESTIONS THERMODYNAMICS PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR NON-TECHNICAL MAJORS. Thermodynamic Properties

Advice to consumer Reference 50.1 May Condensation. Some causes, some advice.

Ecosystem-land-surface-BL-cloud coupling as climate changes

Gravimetric determination of pipette errors

Dew Point Tester. Instruction Manual. CVS Regular Chiller Model A-2. CVS Regular Chiller Model A-2

A beginner s guide to humidity measurement

Commercial refrigeration has been in the environmental. Refrigerant. as a. Basics Considerations PART 1:

E- modeling Of The Arctic Cloud System

ENVIRONMENTAL STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION: CLIMATE SYSTEM Vol. II - Low-Latitude Climate Zones and Climate Types - E.I. Khlebnikova

Frost Damage of Roof Tiles in Relatively Warm Areas in Japan

Estimation of Long-Term Change in Physical Property of Optical Fiber Coating Considering Effect of Humidity

Temperature. PJ Brucat

CONDENSATION. Section Break (Next Page)

Chemistry 212 VAPOR PRESSURE OF WATER LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Thermodynamics of Mixing

6 th Grade Science Assessment: Weather & Water Select the best answer on the answer sheet. Please do not make any marks on this test.

Radiative effects of clouds, ice sheet and sea ice in the Antarctic

Calculation of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Burning Rates

Heikki Turtiainen *, Pauli Nylander and Pekka Puura Vaisala Oyj, Helsinki, Finland. Risto Hölttä Vaisala Inc, Boulder, Colorado

Temperature affects water in the air.

Experiment 12E LIQUID-VAPOR EQUILIBRIUM OF WATER 1

Gases and Kinetic-Molecular Theory: Chapter 12. Chapter Outline. Chapter Outline

Cloud seeding. Frequently Asked Questions. What are clouds and how are they formed? How do we know cloud seeding works in Tasmania?

Partnerships Implementing Engineering Education Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester Public Schools

Transcription:

Saturation vapor pressure formulations Holger Vömel CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder A large number of saturation vapor pressure equations exists to calculate the pressure of water vapor over a surface of liquid water or ice. This is a brief overview of the most important equations used. Several useful reviews of the existing vapor pressure curves are listed in the references. Please note the discussion of the WMO formulations. 1) Vapor pressure over liquid water below 0 C Goff Gratch equation (Smithsonian Tables, 1984, after Goff and Gratch, 1946): Log 10 e w = -7.90298 (373.16/T-1) [1] + 5.02808 Log 10 (373.16/T) - 1.3816 10-7 (10 11.344 (1-T/373.16) -1) + 8.1328 10-3 (10-3.49149 (373.16/T-1) -1) + Log 10 (1013.246) with T in [K] and e w in [hpa] Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO Guide) (WMO, 2008) e w = 6.112 e (17.62 t/(243.12 + t)) [2] with t in [ C] and e w in [hpa] WMO (Goff, 1957): Log 10 e w = 10.79574 (1-273.16/T) [3] 1 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

- 5.02800 Log 10 (T/273.16) + 1.50475 10-4 (1-10 (-8.2969*(T/273.16-1)) ) + 0.42873 10-3 (10 (+4.76955*(1-273.16/T)) - 1) + 0.78614 with T in [K] and e w in [hpa] (Note: WMO based its recommendation on a paper by Goff (1957), which is shown here. The recommendation published by WMO (1988) has several typographical errors and cannot be used. A corrigendum (WMO, 2000) shows the term +0.42873 10-3 (10 (-4.76955*(1-273.16/T)) - 1) in the fourth line compared to the original publication by Goff (1957). Note the different sign of the exponent. The earlier 1984 edition shows the correct formula.) Hyland and Wexler (Hyland and Wexler, 1983): Log e w = -0.58002206 10 4 / T [4] + 0.13914993 10 1-0.48640239 10-1 T + 0.41764768 10-4 T 2-0.14452093 10-7 T 3 + 0.65459673 10 1 Log(T) with T in [K] and e w in [Pa] Buck (Buck Research Manual (1996); updated equation from Buck, A. L., New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1527-1532, 1981) e w = 6.1121 e (18.678 - t / 234.5) t / (257.14 + t) [1996] [5] e w = 6.1121 e 17.502 t / (240.97 + t) [1981] [6] with t in [ C] and e w in [hpa] Sonntag 2 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

(Sonntag, 1994) Log e w = -6096.9385 / T [7] + 16.635794-2.711193 10-2 * T + 1.673952 10-5 * T 2 + 2.433502 * Log(T) with T in [K] and e w in [hpa] Magnus Tetens (Murray, 1967) e w = 6.1078 e 17.269388 * (T-273.16) / (T 35.86) [8] with T in [K] and e w in [hpa] Bolton (Bolton, 1980) e w = 6.112 e 17.67 * t / (t+243.5) [9] with t in [ C] and e w in [hpa] Murphy and Koop (Murphy and Koop, 2005) Log e w = 54.842763-6763.22 / T - 4.21 Log(T) + 0.000367 T + Tanh{0.0415 (T - 218.8)} (53.878-1331.22 / T - 9.44523 Log(T) + 0.014025 T) [10] with T in [K] and e w in [Pa] 3 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam (IAPWS) Formulation 1995 (Wagner and Pruß, 2002) Log (e w /22.064e6) = 647.096/T * ((-7.85951783 ν + 1.84408259 ν 1.5 with T in [K] and e w in [Pa] and ν = 1 - T/647.096-11.7866497 ν 3 + 22.6807411 ν 3.5-15.9618719 ν 4 + 1.80122502 ν 7.5 )) [11] At low temperatures most of these are based on theoretical studies and only a small number are based on actual measurements of the vapor pressure. The Goff Gratch equation [1] for the vapor pressure over liquid water covers a region of -50 C to 102 C [Gibbins 1990]. This work is generally considered the reference equation but other equations are in use in the meteorological community [Elliott and Gaffen, 1993]. There is a very limited number of measurements of the vapor pressure of water over supercooled liquid water at temperatures below C. Detwiler [1983] claims some indirect evidence to support the extrapolation of the Goff-Gratch equation down to temperatures of -60 C. However, this currently remains an open issue. The WMO Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO Guide, WMO No. 8) formulation [2] is widely used in Meteorology and appeals for its simplicity. Together with the formulas by Bolton [9] and Buck [6] it has the same mathematical form as older the Maguns Tetens [8] formula and differs only in the value of the parameters. The Hyland and Wexler formulation is used by Vaisala and is very similar to the formula by Sonntag [7]. The comparison for the liquid saturation vapor pressure equations [2]-[11] with the Goff-Gratch equation [1] in figure 1 shows that uncertainties at low temperatures become increasingly large and reach the measurement uncertainty claimed by some RH sensors. At -60 C the deviations range from -6% to +3% and at -70 C the deviations range from -9% to +6%. For RH values reported in the low and mid troposphere the influence of the saturation vapor pressure formula used is small and only significant for climatological studies [Elliott and Gaffen 1993]. The WMO (WMO No. 49, Technical Regulations) recommended formula [3] is a derivative of the Goff-Gratch equation, originally published by Goff (1957). The differences between Goff (1957) and Goff-Gratch (1946) are less than 1% over the entire temperature range. The formulation published by WMO (1988) cannot be used due to several typographical errors. The corrected formulation WMO (2000) differs in the sign of one exponent compared to Goff (1957). This incorrect formulation is in closer agreement with the Hyland and 4 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

Wexler formulation; however, it is to be assumed that Goff (1957) was to be recommended. The review of vapor pressures of ice and supercooled water by Murphy and Kopp (2005) provides a formulation [10] based on recent data on the molar heat capacity of supercooled water. The comparison of the the vapor pressure equations with the formulation by Murphy and Koop is shown in figure 2. The study by Fukuta and Gramada [2003] shows direct measurements of the vapor pressure over liquid water down to -38 C. Their result indicates that at the lowest temperatures the measured vapor pressure may be as much as 10% lower than the value given by the Smithsonian Tables [1], and as shown in figure 1 lower as any other vapor pressure formulation. However, these data are in conflict with measured molar heat capacity data (Muprhy and Koop, 2005), which have been measured both for bulk as for small water droplets. Like most other formulations, the IAPWS formulation 1995 (Wagner and Pruß, 2002) are valid only above the triple point. The IAWPS formulation 1995 (Wagner and Pruß, 2002) is valid in the temperature range 273.16 K < T < 647.096 K. It is important to note that in the upper troposphere, water vapor measurements reported in the WMO convention as relative humidity with respect to liquid water depend critically on the saturation vapor pressure equation that was used to calculate the RH value. 5 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

Figure 1: Comparison of equations [2]-[11] with the Goff Gratch equation [1] for the saturation pressure of water vapor over liquid water. The measurements by Fukuta et al. [2003] are shown as well. (*) WMO (2000) is also shown. This is based on Goff (1957) with the different sign of one exponent, likely due to a typographical error. 6 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

Figure 2: Comparison of several equations with the equation by Sonntag [7] for the saturation pressure of water vapor over liquid water. The equations by Hyland and Wexler [4], the nearly identical equation by Wexler (1976, see reference below) and the equation by Sonntag [7] are the most commonly used equations among radiosonde manufacturers and should be used in upper air applications to avoid inconsistencies. 7 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

2) Vapor pressure over ice Goff Gratch equation (Smithsonian Tables, 1984): Log 10 e i = -9.09718 (273.16/T - 1) [12] - 3.56654 Log 10 (273.16/ T) + 0.876793 (1 - T/ 273.16) + Log 10 (6.1071) with T in [K] and e i in [hpa] Hyland and Wexler (Hyland and Wexler, 1983.): Log e i = -0.56745359 10 4 / T [13] + 0.63925247 10 1-0.96778430 10-2 T + 0.62215701 10-6 T 2 + 0.20747825 10-8 T 3-0.94840240 10-12 T 4 + 0.41635019 10 1 Log(T) with T in [K] and e i in [Pa] Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO Guide) (WMO, 2008) e i = 6.112 e (22.46 t/(272.62 + t)) [14] with t in [ C] and e i in [hpa] Magnus Teten (Murray, 1967) 8 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

e i = 6.1078 e 21.8745584 * (T-273.16) / (T 7.66) [15] with T in [K] and e w in [hpa] Buck (Buck Research Manual, 1996) e i = 6.1115 e (23.036 - t / 333.7) t / (279.82 + t) [1996] [16] e i = 6.1115 e 22.452 t / (272.55+t) [1981] [17] with t in [ C] and e i in [hpa] Marti Mauersberger (Marti and Mauersberger, 1993) Log 10 e i = -2663.5 / T + 12.537 [18] with T in [K] and e i in [Pa] Murphy and Koop (Murphy and Koop, 2005) Log e i = 9.550426-5723.265/T + 3.53068 Log(T) - 0.00728332 T [19] with T in [K] and e i in [Pa] The Goff Gratch equation [11] for the vapor pressure over ice covers a region of -100 C to 0 C. It is generally considered the reference equation; however, other equations have also been widely used. The equations discussed here are mostly of interest for frost-point measurements using chilled mirror hygrometers, since these instruments directly measure the temperature at which a frost layer and the overlying vapor are in equilibrium. In meteorological practice, relative humidity is given over liquid water (see section 1) and care needs to be taken to consider this difference. Buck Research, which manufactures frost-point hygrometers, uses the Buck formulations in their instruments. These formulations include an enhancement factor, which corrects for the differences between pure vapor and moist air. This enhancement factor is a weak function of temperature and pressure and corrects about 0.5% at sea level. For the current discussion it has been omitted. 9 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

The Marti Mauersberger equation is the only equation based on direct measurements of the vapor pressure down to temperatures of 170 K. The comparison of equations 12-17 with the Goff Gratch equation (figure 3) shows, that with the exception of the Magnus Teten formula, the deviations in the typical meteorological range of -100 C to 0 C are less than 2.5%, and smaller than typical instrumental errors of frost-point hygrometers of 5-10%. Not shown is the WMO recommended equation for vapor pressure over ice, since it is nearly identical with the Goff-Gratch equation [12]. 10 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

Figure 3: Comparison of equations [13]-[18] with the Goff Gratch equation [12] for the saturation pressure of water vapor over ice. 3) References Bolton, D., The computation of equivalent potential temperature, Monthly Weather Review, 108, 1046-1053, 1980.. Buck, A. L., New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1527-1532, 1981. 11 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM

Buck Research Manuals, 1996 Detwiler, A., Extrapolation of the Goff-Gratch formula for vapor pressure over liquid water at temperatures below 0 C, J. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 503, 1983. Elliott, W. P. and D. J. Gaffen, On the utility of radiosonde humidity archives for climate studies, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 72, 1507-1520, 1991. Elliott, W. P. and D. J. Gaffen, Effects of conversion algorithms on reported upper air dewpoint depressions, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74, 1323-1325, 1993. Fukuta, N. and C. M. Gramada, Vapor pressure measurement of supercooled water, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1871-1875, 2003. Gibbins, C. J., A survey and comparison of relationships for the determination of the saturation vapour pressure over plane surfaces of pure water and of pure ice, Annales Geophys., 8, 859-886, 1990. Goff, J. A., and S. Gratch, Low-pressure properties of water from -160 to 212 F, in Transactions of the American society of heating and ventilating engineers, pp 95-122, presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the American society of heating and ventilating engineers, New York, 1946. Goff, J. A. Saturation pressure of water on the new Kelvin temperature scale, Transactions of the American society of heating and ventilating engineers, pp 347-354, presented at the semi-annual meeting of the American society of heating and ventilating engineers, Murray Bay, Que. Canada, 1957. Hyland, R. W. and A. Wexler, Formulations for the Thermodynamic Properties of the saturated Phases of H2O from 173.15K to 473.15K, ASHRAE Trans, 89(2A), 500-519, 1983. Marti, J. and K Mauersberger, A survey and new measurements of ice vapor pressure at temperatures between 170 and 250 K, GRL 20, 363-366, 1993 Murphy, D. M. and T. Koop, Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Quart. J. Royal Met. Soc, 131, 1539-1565, 2005. Murray, F. W., On the computation of saturation vapor pressure, J. Appl. Meteorol., 6, 203-204, 1967. Smithsonian Met. Tables, 5th ed., pp. 350, 1984. Sonntag, D., Advancements in the field of hygrometry, Meteorol. Z., N. F., 3, 51-66, 1994. Wagner W. and A. Pruß, The IAPWS formulation 1995 for the thermodynamic properties of ordinary water substance for general and scientific use, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 31, 387-535, 2002. Wexler, A., Vapor Pressure Formulation for Water in Range 0 to 100 C. A Revision, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 80A, 775-785, 1976. World Meteorological Organization, General meteorological standards and recommended practices, Appendix A, WMO Technical Regulations, WMO-No. 49, Geneva 1988. World Meteorological Organization, General meteorological standards and recommended practices, Appendix A, WMO Technical Regulations, WMO-No. 49, corrigendum, Geneva August 2000. World Meteorological Organization, Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, Appendix 4B, WMO-No. 8 (CIMO Guide), Geneva 2008. IDL source for all equations 1 December 2011 Holger.Voemel@Colorado.edu 12 of 12 03/13/2015 08:58 AM