National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

Similar documents
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a

PROPERTY East Wetumpka Commercial Historic District (Boundary Increas NAME: e)

-- As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act

1. Name of Property. 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions)

Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer/ Tennessee Historical Commission

Status occupied unoccupied x work in progress Accessible _ x yes: restricted yes: unrestricted no

NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM

CAPPELEN MEMORIAL BRIDGE REHABILITATION

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

EAST LYME HIGH SCHOOL

Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project

Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CS Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 6 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 1101 Sutter Street

National Register off Historic Places received MAY i Inventory Nomination Form date entered,- ^

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

Public Information & Public Scoping Meeting

National Register of Historic Places ' Registration Form. 1. Name of Property "^~^~~~~~~~~~~~""~~~"~~~~~~~~~^^^~~~~^~~~~~"^^

NPS Form OMB No

FINAL MIDTOWN CORRIDOR INDIVIDUAL BRIDGE SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

Colorado Off-System Bridge Program Description and Guidelines for Selecting Bridges for Rehabilitation or Replacement Funding

Red Wing Bridge Project. PAC #5/TAC #8 Meeting July 18, 2013

Sample Drawing Package for One and Two Family Dwelling Applications

MOBILE HOME LAW. Revised November 2001

Quality Control and Quality Assurance Guide

Chaudière Crossing Bridge Rehabilitation

3.1 Historical Considerations

Chapter 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION CHAPTER 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION PAGE 33

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH GUIDELINES

Report Connecticut River Valley Project Chelsea Substation Expansion Chelsea, Vermont

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORIC INVENTORY FORM Survey No.: e-rs

WINDOW AND DOOR REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS

Bridge Type Selection

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Value Engineering vs. Alternate Designs in Bridge Bidding

Bridges to Math. Students will collect bridge statistics to use for measurement calculations and comparisons.

BUILDING OVER OR NEAR WATER & SEWER MAINS POLICY

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE

HIGHWAYS ASSET MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES TEAM GUIDANCE NOTE SMT/GN/03/10 TECHNICAL APPROVAL

~iffiui ~ Bridge Condition Survey. Inspection Date: 21 May 2003 District: San Angelo County: Tom Green Highway:

Architectural Inventory Form

Construction Laborer Dies after Falling off Collapsed Precast Concrete Floor Slab

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

Guide to the Jamey Stillings Photographs of the Mike O Callaghan-Pat Tillman Memorial Bridge and the Hoover Dam

For Office Use: Filing Date: Case Number: Zoning District:

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

Concept Design Synopsis

SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS _ VICINITY OF CODE 13 STATUS

The unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity.

Beam bridges are the oldest known bridges and tend to be the simplest to design and build. Roughly half of all bridges

RHODE ISLAND TURNPIKE AND BRIDGE AUTHORITY NEWPORT, RHODE ISLAND CONTRACT NO

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

Historic Bridges of Frederick County. Frederick County, Maryland Division of Public Works Department of Highways and Transportation (301)

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

Fence By-law. PS-6 Consolidated May 14, This by-law is printed under and by authority of the Council of the City of London, Ontario, Canada

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF LOCATION (CAL) APPLICATION Page 2

FINAL MIDTOWN CORRIDOR INDIVIDUAL BRIDGE SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

CITY OF YORBA LINDA P.O. BOX CALIFORNIA

Requirement checklist to obtain a building permit for a: RESIDENTIAL RE-ROOF

OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATE MAIN STREET PROGRAM APPLICATION Application Identification

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

TOWN OF NEW HAVEN ROAD PLAN

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1

COMMONLY USED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODES

Division Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations.

SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS CROSS SLOPE VERIFICATION:

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES

Philadelphia County ' <M^' Pennsylvania 0^- PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA

MAPPING MINNEAPOLIS URBAN TREE CANOPY. Why is Tree Canopy Important? Project Background. Mapping Minneapolis Urban Tree Canopy.

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION

Electric Service Conversion Overhead-to-Underground. Minnesota

National Archives and Record Administration

NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT PROCEDURES

Appendix A Alternative Contracting General Engineering Consultant RFP. Appendix A

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

EI ENGINEERING INSTRUCTION

1,045 m length of the Deh Cho Bridge

SECTION 3 ONM & J STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

SECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS

ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES. for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

29 Broadway- 14 th Fl Tel: New York NY Fax: Due Diligence Report. New York, New York

REHABILITATION OF CONCRETE BEAM BRIDGES IN CROATIAN STATE ROAD NETWORK

Truss Bridges of Kentucky

Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments

TOWER ORDINANCE TOWN OF OWLS HEAD

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Prescriptive Residential Re-roof Project Name:

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

Stone Arch Bridges of Washington County, MD

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Open House Public Meeting for the Thurmond Bridge Rehabilitation Project State Project: State Project S310-25/ Federal Project: BR-0252(001)D

City of Red Wing REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. Levee Park - Riverboat & Transient Boat Dockage, Park and Promenade Improvements Professional Services

Guide for SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK SEALS

The Rehabilitation Alternative Huey P. Long Bridge Case Study. Bruce E. Peterson, P.E. Project Manager Modjeski and Masters, Inc.

Village of Airmont APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS

Transcription:

NPS Form 10400 (R«v. 8-88) United States Department of the nterior Registration Form iff "-.? 2 91989 OWB Mo. 10244018 This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. f an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Nymore Bridge other names/site number No. 2366 2. Location street & number.qi-yp<ai- not for publication city, town vicinity state code MM COUnty code nn? zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property private ] public-local ] public-state public-federal Category of Property building(s) district site ] structure ] object Name of related multiple property listing: Rcinforccd-Concrcto Highway Bridges in Minn., 4. State/Federal Agency Certification Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing buildings sites structures objects.total Number of contributing resources previously 1900-1945 l'sted m tne National Register p As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, hereby certify that this!xh nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Plages and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. n my opiniottnthe propertyj^ meets EH does not meet the National Register criteria. EH See continuation sheet. Signature of certifying official Nina M. Archabal State Historic Preservation Officer State or Federal agency and bureau Minnesota Historical Society Date n my opinion, the property EH meets EH does not meet the National Register criteria. EH See continuation sheet. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 5. Certification l,>hereby, certify that this property is: [/ entered in the National Register. See continuation sheet. determined eligible for the National Register. EH See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register. in tho removed from the National Register. EH other, (explain:) / of the Keeper Date of Action

6. Function or Use Historic Functions (enter categories from instructions) Transportation, road-related Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) Transportation, road 7. Description Architectural Classification (enter categories from instructions) Other: Reinforced-concrete bridge Classical Revival Materials (enter categories from instructions) foundation walls roof _ other Describe present and historic physical appearance. See continuation sheet

NPS Form 1O«OO* OM8 Appmr* No. 102*0018 United States Department of the nterior Continuation Sheet NYMORE BRDGE (BRDGE NO. 2366) 7 1 Section number Page 7. DESCRPTON Nymore Bridge (MNDOT Bridge No. 2366) is located in downtown Bemidji, Beltrami County, Minnesota, where it carries First Street (MSAS 110) over the Mississippi River. At this point the Mississippi is essentially a channel between Lake Bemidji on the north and Lake rving on the south. When built in 1916, the bridge carried "Old Highway 2," connecting the city of Bemidji with the village of Nymore. About that same time (1917), Nymore was in the process of being annexed by the city of Bemidji as the fifth ward. The main city traffic is now carried by MNDOT Bridge No. 5316, located a short distance northeast on Paul Bunyan Drive (State Trunk Highway 197), although Nymore Bridge continues to serve local traffic. Aligned on a northwest -southeast axis, Nymore Bridge (#2366) is a three-span, reinforced - concrete, filled- spandrel, barrel-vault, segmental-arch bridge, with no sidewalks and "U" abutments. Overall length is 168 feet, with a center span length of 65 feet, and adjacent spans of approximately 40 feet; out-out width is 31 feet, carrying a 28-foot roadway. Maximum vertical clearance is approximately 15 feet. Piers and abutments are marked by prominent pilasters. The piers have round starlings, identical on both upstream and downstream sides. The bridge has Neoclassical elements, including raised, bush-hammered panels on pilasters, abutments, spandrel walls, and the filled-panel railings. A large utility pipe obscures (but does not alter) the west railing. Five of eight original light- standards survive. The bridge retains structural and design integrity. The reinforcing system employed in the Nymore Bridge was patented in 1906 by George M. Cheney, ndianapolis, ndiana, and received Letters Patent No. 820,921. Cheney's patent was assigned to the Standard Reinforced Concrete Company, also of ndianapolis, ndiana, who prepared the plans and specifications for Nymore Bridge. Cheney's system basically involves constructing an arched metal truss of angles and gusset plants, separated into vertical panels, all of which is pinned and/ or wired together. Angles extend up to reinforce the spandrel walls. This structure is erected, forms constructed around it, concrete poured, and the arch truss becomes embedded in the concrete. Cheney claimed that his system was designed "to produce a reinforcing structure adapted to be embedded within the concrete, the construction and arrangement of said reinforcing structure being such as to eliminate or nearly eliminate the probability of cracking, but also being such that if there be cracking it will occur along predetermined lines, the concrete structure being so formed as to render less apparent any such cracks". 1. "New Bridge Over Mississippi nlet to Cost $22,772," Bemidji Daily Pioneer, August 22, 1916, p. 1; see also notation on photograph //P-1607, "New Concrete Bridge," c!916, in Beltrami County Historical Society. 2. See Russell N. Edwards, Standard Reinforced Concrete Co., to C.E. Nagle, Bridge Engineer, Minnesota Highway Commission, August 24, 1916, in MNDOT files for Bridge No. 2366. 3. See Specifications of Letters Patent for Patent No. 820,921.

8. Statement of Significance Certifying official has considered the significance of this property in relation to other properties: nationally PH statewide locally Applicable National Register Criteria [HA B [x]c ~ld Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) f~la B f~lc l~~ld E f~lf f~lg Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) Period of Significance Significant Dates Engineering 1917 1917 Architecture Cultural Affiliation N/A Significant Person N/A Architect/Builder Engr.:Standard Reinforced Concrete Engr.:Chenev. George M. State significance of property, and justify criteria, criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. continuation sheet

NP3 Form NXWXHi (M«OMB Affnnl No. 03440H United States Department of the nterior Continuation Sheet NYMORE BRDGE (BRDGE NO. 2366) 8 1 Section number Page 8. SGNFCANCE The Nymore Bridge (MNDOT Bridge No. 2366) is significant in the areas of engineering and architecture in the context of Minnesota Reinforced-Concrete Highway Bridges, 1900-1945. t is an excellent, unaltered, very early, large, urban, barrel-vault, reinforced-concrete bridge in Minnesota. t is additionally significant for its use of a patented reinforcing system during the period of experimentation in reinforcing materials and systems. Designed and built in 1916, it is one of a small group of early, large, reinforcedconcrete arch bridge designed in the Classical Revival style, which is appropriate for the City Beautiful movement then in vogue for prominent urban structures. t was planned to connect the city of Bemidji with the village of Nymore, which was annexed by Bemidji about 1917 and became the city's fifth ward. Not only was the crossing of political significance, giving the bridge its original name, but also is a geographically important crossing. When built, Nymore Bridge carried state route no. 2 over the Mississippi River channel between the city's two major lakes, Lake Bemidji and Lake rving. Today this route has become U.S. 2, which skirts the city, and Nymore Bridge carries State Trunk Highway 197 (also known as Paul Bunyan Drive). The plans and specifications for Nymore Bridge were prepared by the Standard Reinforced Concrete Company of ndianapolis, ndiana. The firm used the assigned Letters Patent No. 820,921 for "Concrete-Bridge Reinforcement," which had been granted in 1906 to George M. Cheney, also of ndianapolis, ndiana. Cheney's system involved embedding in the concrete a metal-arch truss, which was engineered to produce a minimum amount of cracking in the finished surface. This was not Cheney's first bridge patent. n 1902 he was granted Patent No. 708,463 for "Bridge Construction" (to construct reinforced-concrete arch bridges and culverts), which also involved a metal arch system, including the railing, which was embedded in poured concrete. Two contractors are reported to have bid on the Standard company's design incorporating Cheney's patent: the llinois Steel Bridge Company and the Minneapolis Bridge Company. The llinois firm, represented by St. Paul, Minnesota, agents John Zelch and P.T. Walton, had the winning low bid. The final bid, following negotiations with the city, was $22,772. Both firms also bid on a two-arch version and a steel bridge. Zelch had served in the Minnesota House of Representatives 1891-93 and 1905-09. 2 From c!912 to c!935, either with Walton or working alone, he represented the llinois company. The scheduled completion date was January 1, 1917, but a series of problems, including strikes and bad weather, delayed the work. As a result, the structure was not completed until the fall of 1917. 5 1. Bedmiji Daily Pioneer, August 22, 1916, p. 1. 2. See Minnesota Congressmen, Legislators, and other Elected State Officials, W.F. Toensing, comp. (St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society, 1971), p. 132.

NPS Form NWOO* GUS 4wn»tf Ma 10244098 <M«United States Department of the nterior Continuation Sheet NYMORE BRDGE (BRDGE NO. 2366) 8 2 Section number Page 3. Robert M. Frame, "Historic Bridge Project," A Report to the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (1985), pp. 80, 100, 102. 4. "Bridge Complete in about a Year," Bemidji Daily Pioneer, March 21, 1917, p. 1. 5. See city council report, Bemidji Daily Pioneer, September 5, 1917, p. 1.

9. Major Bibliographical References Bemidji Daily Pioneer. 1916-17 Frame, Robert M.. "Historic Bridge Project." Report for the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. 1985 Minnesota. Department of Transportation. Records Storage File for Bridge No. 2366 St. Paul. U.S. Patent Office. Letters Patent 820, 921. George M. Cheney. 1906. Previous documentation on file (NFS): preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested previously listed in the National Register previously determined eligible by the National Register designated a National Historic Landmark _ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # 1 recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # See continuation sheet Primary location of additional data: l~x State historic preservation office Other State agency Federal agency Local government University D Other Specify repository: 10. Geographical Data Acreage of property Less than 1 acre UTM References A h is 13 J5 18 Zone Easting C i5 iq 15 i2 15 18 15 16 iq Northing Zone Easting Northing, i See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description The nominated property defines a rectangle measuring 168 feet northwest-southwest by 60 feet southwest-northeast, the vertices of which coincide with the outside corners of the bridge wingwalls. See continuation sheet Boundary Justification Based on dimensions for overall structure length and overall deck width as determined by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and report on the Structure nventory Sheet for Bridge 2366, the boundaries are designed to enclose the total bridge superstructure, total substructure, and all other integral abutment and approach elements. See continuation sheet 11. Form Prepared By name/title Dr. Robert M. Frame, Historical Consultant organization N ' A August 15, 1989 street & number 202 McBoal Street telephone 612-227-9531 city or town St. Paul state zip code