Cloud and Aerosol Remote Sensing with AirMSPI



Similar documents
Remote Sensing of Clouds from Polarization

Evaluation of the Effect of Upper-Level Cirrus Clouds on Satellite Retrievals of Low-Level Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

IMPROVING AEROSOL DISTRIBUTIONS

Passive Remote Sensing of Clouds from Airborne Platforms

IMPACT OF DRIZZLE AND 3D CLOUD STRUCTURE ON REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUD EFFECTIVE RADIUS

Multiangle cloud remote sensing from

Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) and Remote Sensing

A review of cloud top height and optical depth histograms from MISR, ISCCP, and MODIS

Technical note on MISR Cloud-Top-Height Optical-depth (CTH-OD) joint histogram product

Retrieval of cloud spherical albedo from top-of-atmosphere reflectance measurements performed at a single observation angle

Evaluations of the CALIPSO Cloud Optical Depth Algorithm Through Comparisons with a GOES Derived Cloud Analysis

The Effect of Droplet Size Distribution on the Determination of Cloud Droplet Effective Radius

Cloud Masking and Cloud Products

The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods

ARM SWS to study cloud drop size within the clear-cloud transition zone

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Atmospherically Correcting Hyperspectral Data using FLAASH 2

Data processing (3) Cloud and Aerosol Imager (CAI)

Cloud Oxygen Pressure Algorithm for POLDER-2

Cloud detection and clearing for the MOPITT instrument

An Airborne A-Band Spectrometer for Remote Sensing Of Aerosol and Cloud Optical Properties

Retrieval of vertical cloud properties of deepconvective clouds by spectral radiance measurements

Studying cloud properties from space using sounder data: A preparatory study for INSAT-3D

REMOTE SENSING OF CLOUD-AEROSOL RADIATIVE EFFECTS FROM SATELLITE DATA: A CASE STUDY OVER THE SOUTH OF PORTUGAL

Measurement of the effect of biomass burning aerosol on inhibition of cloud formation over the Amazon

Evaluation of VIIRS cloud top property climate data records and their potential improvement with CrIS

FRESCO. Product Specification Document FRESCO. Authors : P. Wang, R.J. van der A (KNMI) REF : TEM/PSD2/003 ISSUE : 3.0 DATE :

VIIRS-CrIS mapping. NWP SAF AAPP VIIRS-CrIS Mapping

Validating MOPITT Cloud Detection Techniques with MAS Images

Remote Sensing of Contrails and Aircraft Altered Cirrus Clouds

An Introduction to Twomey Effect

16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting. Plymouth, UK February mission: Present status and near future

A SURVEY OF CLOUD COVER OVER MĂGURELE, ROMANIA, USING CEILOMETER AND SATELLITE DATA

'Developments and benefits of hydrographic surveying using multispectral imagery in the coastal zone

2.3 Spatial Resolution, Pixel Size, and Scale

Radar Interferometric and Polarimetric Possibilities for Determining Sea Ice Thickness

DISCOVER AQ OUTLOOK Thursday January 31, 2013

Lectures Remote Sensing

Satellite Remote Sensing of Volcanic Ash

Cloud Thickness Estimation from GOES-8 Satellite Data Over the ARM-SGP Site

Use of ARM/NSA Data to Validate and Improve the Remote Sensing Retrieval of Cloud and Surface Properties in the Arctic from AVHRR Data

Total radiative heating/cooling rates.

Observed Cloud Cover Trends and Global Climate Change. Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography

P1.24 USE OF ACTIVE REMOTE SENSORS TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY OF CLOUD TOP HEIGHTS DERIVED FROM THERMAL SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS

WATER BODY EXTRACTION FROM MULTI SPECTRAL IMAGE BY SPECTRAL PATTERN ANALYSIS

NOAA Climate Reanalysis Task Force Workshop College Park, Maryland 4-5 May 2015

STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Beta Review. Suomi NPP Surface Reflectance IP ARP Product

Overview. What is EMR? Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) LA502 Special Studies Remote Sensing

Cloud Climatology for New Zealand and Implications for Radiation Fields

BRDF, BRF and HDRF in the Revised Manuscript

Clouds and the Energy Cycle

Remote sensing of precipitable water vapour and cloud cover for site selection of the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) using MERIS

A remote sensing instrument collects information about an object or phenomenon within the

Night Microphysics RGB Nephanalysis in night time

TOPIC: CLOUD CLASSIFICATION

Treasure Hunt. Lecture 2 How does Light Interact with the Environment? EMR Principles and Properties. EMR and Remote Sensing

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Sky Monitoring Techniques using Thermal Infrared Sensors. sabino piazzolla Optical Communications Group JPL

G. Karasinski, T. Stacewicz, S.Chudzynski, W. Skubiszak, S. Malinowski 1, A. Jagodnicka Institute of Experimental Physics, Warsaw University, Poland

2 Absorbing Solar Energy

Global Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using CALIOP

SAFNWC/MSG Cloud type/height. Application for fog/low cloud situations

Climatology of aerosol and cloud properties at the ARM sites:

Digital all-sky polarization imaging of partly cloudy skies

MODIS IMAGES RESTORATION FOR VNIR BANDS ON FIRE SMOKE AFFECTED AREA

Volcanic Ash Monitoring: Product Guide

ENVI Classic Tutorial: Atmospherically Correcting Multispectral Data Using FLAASH 2

Surface-Based Remote Sensing of the Aerosol Indirect Effect at Southern Great Plains

Clear Sky Radiance (CSR) Product from MTSAT-1R. UESAWA Daisaku* Abstract

Climatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula

Analysis of Cloud Variability and Sampling Errors in Surface and Satellite Measurements

The Next Generation Flux Analysis: Adding Clear-Sky LW and LW Cloud Effects, Cloud Optical Depths, and Improved Sky Cover Estimates

Passive and Active Microwave Remote Sensing of Cold-Cloud Precipitation : Wakasa Bay Field Campaign 2003

Validation of SEVIRI cloud-top height retrievals from A-Train data

Aerosol radiative forcing over land: effect of surface and cloud reflection

CERES Edition 2 & Edition 3 Cloud Cover, Cloud Altitude and Temperature

Best practices for RGB compositing of multi-spectral imagery

Saharan Dust Aerosols Detection Over the Region of Puerto Rico

How well does MODIS +adiabaticity characterize the south-eastern Pacific stratocumulus deck?

Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission

How To Measure Solar Spectral Irradiance

Improved predictive modeling of white LEDs with accurate luminescence simulation and practical inputs

Level 3 Cloud Fraction by Altitude Algorithm Theoretical Basis

Cloud Remote Sensing during VOCALS- REx: Selected U.S. Efforts

CALCULATION OF CLOUD MOTION WIND WITH GMS-5 IMAGES IN CHINA. Satellite Meteorological Center Beijing , China ABSTRACT

LiDAR for vegetation applications

Adaptive HSI Data Processing for Near-Real-time Analysis and Spectral Recovery *

On the use of Synthetic Satellite Imagery to Evaluate Numerically Simulated Clouds

Satellite Weather And Climate (SWAC) Satellite and cloud interpretation

Supplement of On the microwave optical properties of randomly oriented ice hydrometeors

Simulations of Infrared Radiances over a Deep Convective Cloud System Observed during TC 4 : Potential for Enhancing Nocturnal Ice Cloud Retrievals

RADIATION (SOLAR) Introduction. Solar Spectrum and Solar Constant. Distribution of Solar Insolation at the Top of the Atmosphere

VALIDATION OF SAFNWC / MSG CLOUD PRODUCTS WITH ONE YEAR OF SEVIRI DATA

Methane to Markets Oil and Natural Gas Technology Transfer Workshop

SLSTR Breakout Summary - Gary Corlett (22/03/2012)

Table of Contents. An Introduction to Hyperspectral Imaging Technology

Lake Monitoring in Wisconsin using Satellite Remote Sensing

a) species of plants that require a relatively cool, moist environment tend to grow on poleward-facing slopes.

Cloud Detection over Snow and Ice Using MISR Data

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

The APOLLO cloud product statistics Web service

Transcription:

Interna8onal Workshop on Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Aerosol, Clouds, and Aerosol- Cloud Interac8ons Bremen, Germany, 16-19 December, 2013 Cloud and Aerosol Remote Sensing with AirMSPI Anthony B. Davis, David J. Diner, Olga V. Kalashnikova, Michael J. Garay, Feng Xu, and Michael G. Tosca JPL/Caltech MSPI instrument team: Brian E. Rheingans 1, Sven Geier 1, Sebastian Val 1, Michael A. Bull 1, Veljko M. Jovanovic 1, Carol J. Bruegge 1, Felix C. Seidel 1, Karlton Crabtree 2, Brian Daugherty 2, Russell A. Chipman 2, and Ab Davis 3 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech 2 University of Arizona 3 University of Texas 2013 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged.

Outline Airborne Mul8- angle Spectro- Polarimetric Imager (AirMSPI) Campaigns Aerosols Clouds Aerosols over clouds Discussion

AirMSPI Spectral bands: 355, 380, 445, 470*,555, 660*, 865*, 935 nm (*polarimetric) The AirMSPI camera flies in the nose of NASA s ER-2 aircraft (20 km flight altitude) AirMSPI is mounted in a gimbal for multi-angle viewing between ±67º

Dual-PEM polarimetric imaging approach M2 M1 M3 n Photoelastic modulators (PEMs) time-modulate the linear Stokes components Q and U leaving intensity I unmodulated n Enables retrieval of q = Q/I and u = U/I as relative measurements n Degree of Linear Polarization, DOLP = (q 2 + u 2 ) 1/2

Polarimetric uncertainty NASA Aerosol- Cloud-Ecosystem (ACE) DOLP uncertainty requirement: 0.005 DOLP of 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.20 measured for polarizer angles 0º, 45º, 90º, 135º DOLP of 1.0 measured for polarizer angles 0º(10º)170º

flight Step and stare imaging 60 km 60 km Bakersfield, 22 January 2013 10 m spatial sampling 10 km x 11 km swath

flight Sweep mode imaging 25 m spatial sampling ~100 km target length Backward sweep Forward sweep Santa Barbara, 1 August 2013

2013 field campaigns n ACE Polarimeter Definition Experiment (PODEX) n Jan 14, 16, 18, 22, 28, 31; Feb 1, 3, 6: California n In conjunction with DISCOVER-AQ n Hyperspectral Infrared Imager (HyspIRI) n Apr 19; May 3, 7: California n Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC 4 RS) n Aug 1, 2, 6, 8, 12, 16, 19, 23, 30; Sep 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 13, 16, 18, 22, 23: n Western US, Central US, Southeast US, Honduras, Canada n Targets n Clear ocean with visible wave structure, sunglint patterns n Farmland, foothills, mountains, rivers, lakes, urban areas, snow fields, desert n Smoke and pollution aerosols n Fog, broken stratus, stratocumulus, scattered cumulus, and cirrus n Glories, supernumerary bows, cloudbow n Calibration targets: Rosamond Dry Lake, Ivanpah Playa, Railroad Valley

Public release of AirMSPI data AirMSPI data are made publicly available in HDF5 format at the NASA Langley Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) Documentation available https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/airmspi/airmspi_table 2013 date Availability (engineering/demo-test flights) 14 Jan Data publicly available at the LaRC ASDC 16 Jan More data publicly available at the LaRC ASDC 18 Jan Yet more data publicly available at the LaRC ASDC 3 Feb Monterey data publicly available at the LaRC ASDC, remainder currently being delivered Additional data from the 2013 PODEX, HyspIRI, and SEAC 4 RS field campaigns to be delivered in Winter and Spring 2014

Smoke detection using oblique-angle UV Oblique viewing angles enhance the presence even very thin smoke AirMSPI s two UV bands (355nm and 380nm) were used during SEAC 4 RS to calculate to an absorbing Aerosol Index (AI): AI = -100 [log 10 (I 355 /I 380 ) meas log 10 (I 355 /I 380 ) calc ] (after Herman et al., 1997; Torres et al., 1998) Aerosol Index Smoke Nadir 58.9º oblique view Smoke defined as AI > 0.5 in 58.9º image

AirMSPI observations over Fresno, CA Residential area Fresno AERONET site 1/6/2012 11

GRASP approach (see Dubovik et al, 2011) Simultaneous inversion of a large group of pixels within one or several images Spatially smooth, spectrally dependent AOD Size distribution (shapeindependent): - dv/dlnr - volume size distribution in total atmospheric column; - size distribution is modeled using 22 size bins (0.05 r 15 µm); - size distribution is smooth AEROSOL shape and composition (in the total atmospheric column): randomly oriented homogeneous spheroids; aspect ratio distribution N(ε) is fixed to that retrieved by Dubovik et al. 2006 1.33 n 1.6; 0.0005 k 0.5 n and k smooth, spectrally dependent

GRASP retrieval application to AirMSPI data Surface Albedo @ = 555 nm Latitude 36.79 36.78 36.77 36.76 36.75 36.74 36.73 36.72 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 119.82 119.8 119.78 119.76 119.74 119.72 Longitude 0.06 0.8 0.7 GRASP AERONET Aerosol Optical Depth @ = 555 nm Aerosol Optical Depth 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Latitude 36.79 36.78 36.77 36.76 36.75 36.74 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.2 36.73 36.72 0.4 0.35 0.1 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Wavelegnth (nm) 119.82 119.8 119.78 119.76 119.74 119.72 Longitude 0.3

GRASP: aerosol size and composition Aerosol Single Scattering Albedo @ = 555 nm 1 1 0.995 GRASP AERONET Latitude 36.79 36.78 36.77 36.76 36.75 36.74 36.73 36.72 1 0.99 119.82 119.8 119.78 119.76 119.74 119.72 Longitude Spatially Averaged 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.9 Single Scattering Albedo 0.99 0.985 0.98 0.975 0.97 0.965 0.96 0.955 0.95 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 3.5 x Wavelength (nm) 106 3 GRASP AERONET Single Scattering Albedo 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.9 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Wavelegnth (nm) Volume Size Distribution 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Radius (µm)

GRASP application to SEAC 4 RS data (preliminary) Intensity RGB Image (Nadir View) AirMSPI step-and-stare image from 23 August 2013, 16:15 UTC in Arkansas. ER-2 (AirMSPI) and DC8 (4STAR) were collocated. Aerosol Optical Depth 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 AirMSPI Retrievals vs. 4STAR Spatially Averaged AirMSPI (spatial avg) 4STAR (temporal avg) 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Wavelength Wavelegnth (nm) (nm) Latitude GRASP Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval (555 nm) Aerosol Optical Depth @ = 555 nm 0.5 33.43 0.45 33.42 0.4 33.41 0.35 33.4 33.39 0.3 33.38 0.25 33.37 0.2 33.36 0.15 92.73 92.72 92.71 92.7 92.69 92.68 92.67 92.66 92.65 92.64 Longitude

Surface reflection Aerosol vertical profile Retrieval strategy Size distribut. Number density of species WRF-Chem & Surface Constraint Sphericity Refractive index Air quality and health applications Relax more WRF-Chem constraints Minimize error between model and data Relax size distribution Relax surface reflection Retrieval over total AOD Relax number density of 8 species (or 13 modes) Collaboration with Jun Wang and Cui Ge University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Retrieval assumptions Band width effect and O 3 absorption ignored Surface reflection retrieved assuming AERONET aerosol Species limited to (SO 4, NO 3, NH 4 ), BC and OC Species optical properties are defined by WRF-Chem Species vertical profile based on WRF-Chem Mean radius derived from WRF-Chem

WRF-Chem aerosols optical characteristics Normalized N(r) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 RH = 0% RH = 50% RH = 70% RH = 80% RH = 90% RH = 95% RH = 99% Size distribution Aerosol species Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium 0.2 Refractive index n r 1.5 1.48 1.46 1.44 1.42 1.4 1.38 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 r (µm) RH = 0% RH = 50% RH = 70% RH = 80% RH = 90% RH = 95% RH = 99% Black Carbon Mixing Organic Carbon 1.36 1.34 1.32 200 400 600 800 1000 200 400 600 800 wavelength (nm)

WRF-Chem aerosol properties Fresno Unimodal distribution of each species 1.2 1 SO4, NO3 & NH4 Normalized N(r) 0.8 BC BC OC 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0.001 0.01 0.1 r (µm) RH = 10% 1 1/6/2012

Step 2: AirMSPI data fit Relax size distribution Relax surface reflection Relax more WRF- Chem constraints Retrieval over total AOD Relax fractions of 3 species BRF or Polarized BRF 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 356 378 445 470 555 661 865 470P 660P 865P 0.1 0 Channel (angle/band)

AERONET comparison 2.5 3 x 106 WRF Chem Aerosols AERONET Volume Size Distribution 2 1.5 1 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0 1 2 3 0.54 5 Radius (µm) Aerosol Optical Depth 0.4 WRF Chem Aerosols AERONET 0.3 0.2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Wavelegnth (nm)

Speciated aerosol optical depth 1 WRF-Chem initial 1 AirMSPI constrained Species Optical Depth 0.1 0.01 0.001 Species Optical Depth 0.01 0.0001 1e 06 1e 08 0.0001 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 wavelength (nm) 1e 10 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 wavelength (nm)

Species fractions Volume fractions of aerosol species: 9% 5% 13% 95% 78% WRF-Chem initial AirMSPI constrained SO 4, NO 3, NH 4,... Organic Carbon Black Carbon 5% < 1%

Status (aerosols) n GRASP retrieval was applied to high-resolution (10m) AirMSPI spectro-polarimetric data for the first time n This provides high resolution (250 m x 250 m) AOD and aerosol optical property data n Initial AirMSPI retrieval results obtained with GRASP are consistent with AERONET and 4STAR observations n We are working on developing a new, integrated WRF-AirMSPI retrieval approach to characterize speciated aerosol properties n Field campaigns (including PODEX and SEAC 4 RS) are an excellent opportunity for new polarimetric retrieval validation

AirMSPI cloud observations and modeling Stratocumulus clouds off the California coast 8/31/2011 Figure 19. Estimates of scattering phase matrix element P 12 derived from primary cloudbow and Fig. 19. Estimates of scattering phase matrix element P Following supernumerary bow data Bréon acquired by AirMSPI and off Goloub the coast 12 derived from primary cloudbow and of Southern (1998), California on 31 the August supernumerary bow data acquired by AirMSPI o the coast of Southern California on 31 August 2011 (open circles). Observations at the same scattering angle have been binned together in steps 2011 supernumerary (open circles). Observations at of 0.125º. Corrections for view bows the same scattering and illumination are geometry, modeled angle have been Rayleigh transmittance with binned together and a in steps of 0.125. Corrections for view and illumination geometry, Rayleigh transmittance and scattering, and absorption have been applied to the data. The model results (solid lines) are scattering, narrow and ozonedroplet absorption have size been applied distribution to the data. The model with results mode (solid lines) derived following the methodology of Bréon and Goloub (1998). The results shown are for a are derived following the methodology of Bréon and Goloub (1998). The results shown are for radius droplet size distribution = 7.5 with µm. an effective radius of 7.5 µm and effective variance of 0.01. The a droplet size distribution with an e ective radius of 7.5 µm and e ective variance of 0.01. The model takes into account the spectrally varying index of refraction of water. To make the plots model takes into account the spectrally varying index of refraction of water. To make the plots The more visible, approach the data and model of results Alexandrov at 660 nm have been offset et upwards al. by (2012) 0.3, and the more visible, the data and model results at 660 nm have been o set upwards by 0.3, and the results at 865 nm have been offset upwards by 0.6. results at 865 nm have been o set upwards by 0.6. gives similar results. 25

Cloudbow analysis of broken cumulus The droplet size retrieval also works for broken clouds Intensity (470, 660, 865 nm) A simple intensity threshold was used to separate clouds from ocean. These data are fitted with with a distribution having an effective radius of 12 µm and effective variance of 0.02 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 DOLP (470, 660, 865 nm) 6 February 2013, 22:26 UTC - Pacific sweep image P12 0.00-0.20-0.40-0.60 470 nm data 470 nm model 660 nm data (+0.3) 660 nm model (+0.3) 865 nm data (+0.6) 865 nm model (+0.6) -0.80 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 Scattering angle (deg)

19:23UTC Step and stare views 29º forward view 19:25UTC discontinuity in fringe positions indicates change in droplet size smaller drops larger drops primary bow 29º backward view

Identification of cirrus from atmospheric optics The subsun is the reflection of the solar disk from horizontallyoriented ice crystal plates. The DOLP of the subsun is 0.65, less than for pure specular reflection, possibly due to: light from a lower cloud deck plates with non-horizontal orientations Clouds over ocean 1 February 2013, 21:11 UTC Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL) data show cirrus above lower cloud

Cirrus optical depth estimation Intensity (470, 660, 865 nm) DOLP (470, 660, 865 nm) 470nm AirMSPI polarized intensity Modeled polarized intensity 1 February 2013 22:21 UTC Pacific ocean Lines are contours of scattering angle CPL data show no aerosol under cirrus Following Cole et al. (2013), AirMSPI data were fitted with simulated polarized radiances calculated for a cirrus General Habit Mixture by Bryan Baum. The best fit is obtained with a cirrus optical depth of 0.2.

6 August 2013 18:59 UTC Off the Oregon coast Smoke over cloud brownish color due to smoke from Big Windy fire glory at 180º scattering angle

Exploita8on of Intensity Field Reminder: We know droplet size distribupon (r e,v e ) at image/cloud- scale. Pixel- scale COD τ is derived from LUT (τ,θ v,φ v, θ 0,r e,v e ), but it is biased by 3D RT (radiapve smoothing) effects.

Exploita8on of Intensity Field To Do: EsPmate radiapve smoothing scale η from structure funcpon. Derive cloud thickness Η from η/η, a weak funcpon of (1 g)τ. Coarsen resolupon to ~1 km 2-3 x η, then derive unbiased τ. OpPonally, apply inverse NIPA to restore pixel- scale τ field. Refs: Davis et al., JAS, 1997 Marshak et al., IEEE TGRS, 1998.

AirMSPI / marine Sc in ~backscatter views (teaser) Interpretation of intriguing AirMSPI data from marine Sc Context 31 August 2011 19:30 UTC, Step-and-stare mode (10 m resolution) at 26.5º backward Intensity DOLP Color composite: 440 nm (blue), 660 nm (green), and 865 nm (red) 33

AirMSPI / marine Sc in ~backscatter views (teaser) Interpretation of intriguing AirMSPI data from marine Sc Context 31 August 2011 19:30 UTC, Step-and-stare mode (10 m resolution) at 26.5º forward Intensity DOLP Color composite: 440 nm (blue), 660 nm (green), and 865 nm (red) 34

AirMSPI / marine Sc in ~backscatter views (teaser) Interpretation of intriguing AirMSPI data from marine Sc Preliminary diagnostics from AirMSPI s Aug 31 st, 2011 flight over marine stratocumulus off the coast near Los Angeles, Ca. Step & stare mode in near-backscatter geometry Color composite: 440 nm (blue), 660 nm (green), and 865 nm (red) 35

AirMSPI / marine Sc in ~backscatter views (teaser) Interpretation of intriguing AirMSPI data from marine Sc Preliminary diagnostics from AirMSPI s Aug 31 st, 2011 flight over marine stratocumulus off the coast near Los Angeles, Ca. Step/stare mode in near-backscatter geometry (wavelength decomposed) 36

Summary/Discussion/Outlook Airborne Mul8- angle Spectro- Polarimetric Imager (AirMSPI) Campaigns Aerosols Clouds Aerosols over clouds? Ques8ons?