NHPCO Guidelines for Using CAHPS Hospice Survey Results



Similar documents
CMS Eligibility Requirements Checklist for MSSP ACO Participation

RE: Operational Standards for the Cancer Waiting Times Commitments

The Importance of Market Research

SALARY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CANCER REGISTRARS

Please provide a 2-3 sentence summary of your proposal: Financial Profile of Organization:

User Guide for Hospice Quality Reporting Data Collection

Army DCIPS Employee Self-Report of Accomplishments Overview Revised July 2012

Phi Kappa Sigma International Fraternity Insurance Billing Methodology

Aim The aim of a communication plan states the overall goal of the communication effort.

Request for Proposal. Saskatchewan Arts Board. Database Development. RFP Reference Number S AB-ADMIN001. Release Date Februar y 9, 2016

Research Report. Abstract: The Emerging Intersection Between Big Data and Security Analytics. November 2012

Patient Participation Report

Findings on Health Care Cost, Pricing and Reimbursement in Alaska 1 Excerpted from Annual Reports of the Alaska Health Care Commission

Connecticut State Department of Education School Health Services Information Survey

Frequently Asked Questions: CMMI Data Collection

Revised October 27, 2011 Page 1 of 6

The Family Cost Share system is designed so families with the ability to pay will share in the cost of services.

CTF-ENDORSED NF CLINICS: PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION

The Allstate Foundation Domestic Violence Program 2015 Moving Ahead Financial Empowerment Grant

Enrollee Health Assessment Program Implementation Guide and Best Practices

University of Glasgow Policy on Course Evaluation Questionnaires

2014 Clinical Quality Measures Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012

3/2 MBA Application Instructions

Overview of the Final Requirements for Meaningful Use through 2017

Student Academic Learning Services Page 1 of 7. Statistics: The Null and Alternate Hypotheses. A Student Academic Learning Services Guide

FINANCE SCRUTINY SUB-COMMITTEE

Research Report. Abstract: Security Management and Operations: Changes on the Horizon. July 2012

Qualification Specification Level 3 Award in Effective Auditing and Inspection Skills

Succession Planning & Leadership Development: Your Utility s Bridge to the Future

Request for Proposal (RFP) RFP HQ Training Session and Leadership Program Development Consulting Services

Watlington and Chalgrove GP Practice - Patient Satisfaction Survey 2011

COE: Hybrid Course Request for Proposals. The goals of the College of Education Hybrid Course Funding Program are:

Sampling and Data Collection

HIPAA 5010 Implementation FAQs for Health Care Professionals

ITIL Service Offerings & Agreement (SOA) Certification Program - 5 Days

RCPNC Grants for Creative Strategies and Pragtimatic Pragmatins

Professionalism and Physical Therapy: Core Values Reflection Essay

IT Help Desk Service Level Expectations Revised: 01/09/2012

Hearing Loss Regulations Vendor information pack

Listening to Students: Sample Focus Group and Survey Materials

Gravesham Borough Council

Annuities and Senior Citizens

Emergency Preparedness Plans. Page 1 of 19

TAKING OWNERSHIP OF HEALTH CARE

Business Continuity Management Systems Foundation Training Course

ITIL Release Control & Validation (RCV) Certification Program - 5 Days

The Ohio Board of Regents Credit When It s Due process identifies students who

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR SHAREPOINT LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

In-Booth Survey. Visitor demographics and activity within the exhibit.

California DSRIP 2.0 Recommendations for Domain 4: Prevention

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION IN VISUAL ARTS EDUCATION (050A)

EJttilb Health. The University of Texas Medical Branch Audit Services. Audit Report. Epic In-Basket Management Audit. Engagement Number

Financial advisr & Consultant Surveys - A Review

March 2016 Group A Payment Issues: Missing Information-Loss Calculation letters ( MILC ) - deficiency resolutions: Outstanding appeals:

2013 Small and Medium Businesses Mobile Solutions Study

ISO Management Systems. Guidance on understanding the benefits of an ISO Management System

Getting Started Guide

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Classification Higher Education Worker, Level 7. Responsible to. I.T Manager. The Position

Customer Care Policy

on your great performance on the PSAT/NMSQT, Lucy

FHWA Compliance Assessment Program (CAP) Guidance

A. Name. B. School district and building(s) List all that apply. C. Current assignment. D. Teaching license/certificate number

Credit Work Group Recommendation

7/25/14 FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUPPORT EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT HANDBOOK

How to put together a Workforce Development Fund (WDF) claim 2015/16

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Elementary School Grading Procedures Plan

Change Management Process

A Walk on the Human Performance Side Part I

CCPRF. Request for Proposals. Monitoring Services. November 25, 2009

Bakersfield College Program Review Annual Update

PBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus

AMWA Chapter Subgroups on LinkedIn Guidance for Subgroup Managers and Chapter Leaders, updated

Welcome to CNIPS Training: CACFP Claim Entry

MANITOBA SECURITIES COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN

TIPS FOR DEALING WITH ADRs, PROBE EDITS, AND THE MEDICARE APPEALS PROCESS

PA 8: Affordability and Access

Developing Your Professional Portfolio

Appendix A Page 1 of 5 DATABASE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS AND PRICING INFORMATION. Welcome Baby and Select Home Visitation Programs Database

DIVISION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Medical Management. At a Glance 2. When to Notify Medical Management 3. Procedures Requiring Predetermination 4. Care Management Services 5

MEDICAL INFORMATION AND CALL CENTER PERFORMANCE BUILDING NEW PRACTICES TO MEET THE EVOLVING NEEDS OF HCPS AND PATIENTS

Consolidated Edison of New York: Residential Direct Install Program: Process Evaluation Summary

Duration of job. Context and environment: (e.g. dept description, region description, organogram)

Crnwall Partners in Care

IN-HOUSE OR OUTSOURCED BILLING

Internet and Policy User s Guide

Key Steps for Organizations in Responding to Privacy Breaches

The Cost of Not Nurturing Leads

Professional Leaders/Specialists

Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Role and Scope Course

Multi-Year Accessibility Policy and Plan for NSF Canada and NSF International Strategic Registrations Canada Company,

Health Stream Portfolio (e.g. Mental health, drug & alcohol) and Contract of Employment

Request for Proposals

HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices. Central Ohio Surgical Associates, Inc.

Draft for consultation

RECONCILIATION OF FUNDS

Addressing Drug and Device Recalls in Hospitals

IEMA Practitioner Volume 14 Supporting Information

Master of Education in Organizational Leadership PROGRAM APPLICATION

Equal Pay Audit 2014 Summary

Transcription:

Intrductin NHPCO Guidelines fr Using CAHPS Hspice Survey Results The Centers fr Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has develped the Cnsumer Assessment f Healthcare Prviders and Systems (CAHPS ) Hspice Survey t measure and assess the experiences f patients wh died while receiving hspice care, as well as the experiences f their infrmal primary caregivers. Starting in 2015, CMS requires hspices t participate in the new CAHPS Hspice Survey. As part f the prcess, and t ensure that survey data are unbiased, hspices are required t cntract with a third-party vendr that has been apprved by CMS and has gne thrugh CMS training in cllecting and submitting CAHPS survey data. In September f 2014 CMS released a list f vendrs that meet the CAHPS Hspice Survey requirements and that are cnditinally apprved t administer the CAHPS Hspice Survey. The list can be accessed n the CMS CAHPS Hspice Survey website. Perfrmance measures used t evaluate the quality f hspice care shuld be accurate measures f gd care that are directly influenced by hw the hspice perates, and that als take int accunt the unique needs and values f the patients and families served by hspice. Evaluating the results f hspice care frm the perspective f the family caregiver has been shwn t be a valuable means f demnstrating effectiveness f care delivery, and subsequently, an indicatin f quality hspice care. In additin t its utility fr accuntability, the CAHPS Hspice Survey shuld be used by hspices as a surce f meaningful and actinable data, and thereby a valid vehicle fr imprving utcmes and ensuring quality f care. 1

Hw t Use CAHPS Hspice Survey Results CMS has nt yet released the scring methdlgy fr the measures derived frm the CAHPS Hspice Survey r annunced final plans fr public reprting f the results. In the interim, NHPCO recmmends that yu fcus n the use f the CAHPS Hspice Survey as a means fr quality imprvement t infrm striving fr excellence by prviding the highest pssible quality f care. Until CMS prvides mre infrmatin n scring fr the CAHPS Hspice Survey we suggest that yu d the fllwing: 1. Becme familiar with all f the questins n the CAHPS Hspice Survey and the specific aspects f care represented by each ne. 2. Examine the respnse frequencies hw many times is each pssible respnse given fr each questin? What percentage f ttal respnses fr each questin des each respnse represent? 3. Lk fr pprtunities fr imprvement by examining the percentage f respnses t each questin that is nt the best pssible respnse. Fr example: Fr a CAHPS Hspice Survey questin that has a respnse set f Always Smetimes, Usually, and Never, the percentage f respnses ther than Always shws the magnitude f pprtunity fr imprvement. 4. Determine which pprtunities fr imprvement shuld be yur fcus based n yur hspice s standard f care. Fr example: If 3 in 10 persns respnded with the less than best respnse fr a questin, is that the gal that yu want t set fr yur hspice prgram? 5. Cmpare the characteristics f the respndents t the CAHPS Hspice Survey t the characteristics f the entire patient ppulatin served by yur hspice. CAHPS Hspice Survey results must be reviewed in cntext with ther factrs, such as patient and caregiver demgraphics, t determine if the results are representative f yur entire patient/family census. 2

AREAS FOR CAUTION 1. Be patient and judicius in interpreting CAHPS Hspice Survey results. Be wary f early returns. Results frm a small number f surveys may nt prvide a reliable representatin f yur hspice s perfrmance. Wait t examine results within a timeframe (e.g., calendar quarters) that will allw meaningful evaluatin f trends in scres. 2. Direct cmparisns with results fr questins frm the Family Evaluatin f Hspice Care (FEHC) survey are nt pssible. Because the scring fr the CAHPS Hspice Survey is nt yet available, there is n established relatinship between scres n the FEHC survey and questins n the CAHPS Hspice Survey -- even fr questins that have similar wrding. Therefre, it is impssible t predict hw a hspice will perfrm n the CAHPS Hspice Survey based n perfrmance n the FEHC survey. 3. CMS will eventually release natinal data fr the CAHPS Hspice Survey that can be used t cmpare hspices t each ther. Until that time, n natinal benchmarks are available. In the meantime, yu will have t rely n yur vendr fr cmparisn results and cautin is advised in interpreting cmparisns when yu are relying n the results frm a single vendr. If yur vendr prvides yu with cmparisn data yu shuld cnsider hw the hspices in the vendr s client base cmpare t yurs based n the answers t the fllwing: a. Hw many hspices are in the vendr s database? b. What are the rganizatinal characteristics (size, tax status, gegraphic area served, etc.) f thse hspices? 4. The methdlgy fr calculatin f the scres fr the quality measures derived frm the CAHPS Hspice Survey questins is nt yet available. CMS has designated multiple tpics (dmains) based n CAHPS Hspice Survey questins: Hspice team cmmunicatin (Q6, Q8, Q9, Q14, Q35) Getting timely care (Q5, Q7) Treating family member with respect (Q11, Q12) Prviding emtinal supprt (Q37, Q38) Supprt fr religius and spiritual beliefs (Q36) Getting help fr symptms (Q16, Q22, Q25, Q27) Infrmatin cntinuity (Q10) 3

Understanding the side effects f pain medicatin (Q18) Teach Hw t Care fr the Patient at Hme (Q19, Q20, Q23, Q29) Six are cmpsites (i.e., a cmbinatin f tw r mre questins) and three are single item indicatrs. Because the fficial calculatin methd is nt available, cmputatin f tpic/dmain scres shuld nt be attempted. Hwever, analysis f the data frm the CAHPS Hspice Survey field test demnstrated that the questins that cmprise each tpic are related. Hspices shuld grup these questins tgether when examining CAHPS Hspice Survey results and evaluating the need fr quality imprvement. 4

CAHPS HOSPICE SURVEY REPORT COMPONENTS The table belw presents NHPCO recmmendatins fr inclusin f data in CAHPS Hspice Survey results reprting that are needed t infrm and enhance hspices quality imprvement effrts. COMPONENT SHOULD HAVE NICE TO HAVE Respnse Frequencies Ttal number f respnses t each questin Number f respnses fr every respnse ptin fr each questin Percentages f respnses fr every respnse ptin fr each questin Graphic representatin f respnses s perfrmance can be seen at a glance Results brken ut by team (fr larger rganizatins) Results ver time Respndent Demgraphic Infrmatin Characteristics f caregivers wh cmpleted a survey: Age Gender Educatin level Relatinship t patient Ethnicity Race Characteristics f caregivers wh did nt cmplete a survey Patient Demgraphic Infrmatin Characteristics f the patients whse caregivers cmpleted a survey: Age Gender Ethnicity Race Principal diagnsis Lcatin f care Characteristics f patients whse caregivers did nt cmplete a survey Other Respnse rate 5