Advantages and limitations of using satellite images for flood mapping



Similar documents
Monitoring a Changing Environment with Synthetic Aperture Radar. Alaska Satellite Facility National Park Service Don Atwood

JRC and GMES GIO-EMS

The needs on big data management for Operational Geo-Info Services: Emergency Response, Maritime surveillance, Agriculture Management

Copernicus Space Component ESA Data Access Overview J. Martin (ESA), R. Knowelden (Airbus D&S)

Multisensor Data Integration in O&G Business Lutz Petrat Hélène Lemonnier Michael Hall

Data Warehouse Phase 2 set-up and data offer. Bianca Hoersch, Veronique Amans, Jolyon Martin, Lena Stern, Silke Bode, Luc Govaert

A remote sensing instrument collects information about an object or phenomenon within the

Benefits of local satellite tasking and real-time data downlink

Active and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing

Operational Space- Based Crop Mapping Protocols at AAFC A. Davidson, H. McNairn and T. Fisette.

How To Use Data From Copernicus And Big Data To Help The Environment

Sodankylä National Satellite Data Center (NSDC): Current and Future Satellite Missions and Products

The use of Satellite Remote Sensing for Offshore Environmental Benchmarking

COPERNICUS SPACE COMPONENT DATA ACCESS 6TH DWH DATA SUPPLY USER SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE - ACROSS COPERNICUS SERVICES PROVIDERS RESULTS

Satellite Snow Monitoring Activities Project CRYOLAND

Review for Introduction to Remote Sensing: Science Concepts and Technology

Automated Spacecraft Scheduling The ASTER Example

How To Write A Call To Action For Terrasar-X

Istanbul Technical University-Center for Satellite Communications and Remote Sensing (ITU-CSCRS)

From Ideas to Innovation

Monitoring of Arctic Conditions from a Virtual Constellation of Synthetic Aperture Radar Satellites

Tools and Methods for Global Urban Analysis

Space radar technologies for oil spills management, detection of illegal fishing and logging activities

Emergency Management Service. early warning FLOOD AND FIRE ALERTS. Space

Global environmental information Examples of EIS Data sets and applications

EO INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE

Let s SAR: Mapping and monitoring of land cover change with ALOS/ALOS-2 L-band data

The following was presented at DMT 14 (June 1-4, 2014, Newark, DE).

Welcome to NASA Applied Remote Sensing Training (ARSET) Webinar Series

Sentinel-1 Mission Overview

Information Contents of High Resolution Satellite Images

Monitoring Soil Moisture from Space. Dr. Heather McNairn Science and Technology Branch Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

From Whitehall to orbit and back again: using space in government

The German interagency approach to SSA

Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission

Exploitation of historical satellite SAR archives for mapping and monitoring landslides at regional and local scale

Satellites for Terrain Motion Mapping Terrafirma User Workshop Mining. Nico Adam

June TerraSAR-X-based Flood Mapping Service

Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS): Rapid Damage Assessment

Methods for Monitoring Forest and Land Cover Changes and Unchanged Areas from Long Time Series

Aneeqa Syed [Hatfield Consultants] Vancouver GIS Users Group Meeting December 8, 2010

Forestry Thematic Exploitation Platform Earth Observation Open Science 2.0

MASS PROCESSING OF REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION IN EUROPE

SPOT Satellite Earth Observation System Presentation to the JACIE Civil Commercial Imagery Evaluation Workshop March 2007

ENVI THE PREMIER SOFTWARE FOR EXTRACTING INFORMATION FROM GEOSPATIAL IMAGERY.

Radar interferometric techniques and data validation Terrafirma Essen, March Page 1

Mapping Earth from Space Remote sensing and satellite images. Remote sensing developments from war

Traffic Monitoring Systems. Technology and sensors

PI: Riccardo Lanari (IREA CNR)

2009 CAP Grant Kickoff USGS, Reston, VA May 21, 2009

The use of Earth Observation technology to support the implementation of the Ramsar Convention

Big data and Earth observation New challenges in remote sensing images interpretation

Improving global data on forest area & change Global Forest Remote Sensing Survey

The distribution of marine OpenData via distributed data networks and Web APIs. The example of ERDDAP, the message broker and data mediator from NOAA

Spectral Response for DigitalGlobe Earth Imaging Instruments

GLOBAL MONITORING FOR FOOD SECURITY IM SUDAN

A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPRAOCH FOR AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT USING CONVENTIONAL CCTV CAMERA

Adaptation of High Resolution Ikonos Images to Googleearth for Zonguldak Test Field

Price List. January 1 st, of 40. PRICE LIST January 1 st, 2016 SLS-COM

16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting. Plymouth, UK February mission: Present status and near future

The premier software for extracting information from geospatial imagery.

DESCW: PC Software Supporting Remote Sensing Data

Senior Advisor for EO Applications, ESA-ESRIN

High Resolution RF Analysis: The Benefits of Lidar Terrain & Clutter Datasets

the Cloud Dean McCormick Regional Sales Manager Geospatial MEA Region

EGNSS evolution and upstream R&D activities

INVESTIGA I+D+i 2013/2014

Advanced Image Management using the Mosaic Dataset

Brian D. Conway Hydrologist/Supervisor Geophysics-Surveying Unit

2.3 Spatial Resolution, Pixel Size, and Scale

CASE STUDY LANDSLIDE MONITORING

ACCESS TO ERS AND ENVISAT DATA. CGMS is informed about the ESA Earth Observation data policy and data access, in particular in Near Real Time.

Space Work Programme 2015

MODIS direct broadcast data for enhanced forecasting and real-time environmental decision making. The role of Remote Sensing in Wildfire Management

The Multimission National Center of the Italian Space Agency

European Space Agency EO Missions. Ola Gråbak ESA Earth Observation Programmes Tromsø, 17 October 2012

Spanish Earth Observation Programme

Data Warehouse Requirements Version 2.0

SatelliteRemoteSensing for Precision Agriculture

COMPACT GUIDE. Camera-Integrated Motion Analysis

Files Used in this Tutorial

Yves Bühler, Urs Wegmüller, Christine Pielmeier, Regula Frauenfelder, Geospatial World Forum, Geneva

Transcription:

Advantages and limitations of using satellite images for flood mapping Domenico Grandoni e-geos Headquarter Contrada Terlecchie 75100 Matera - Italy Commercial Office Via Cannizzaro 71 00156 Roma - Italy Workshop on the Use of the Copernicus Emergency Service for Floods Brussels, October 21 th 2013 Material produced within GMES/Copernicus Emergency Management Service - Mapping in RUSH mode - funded by the EC budget (DG ENTR) Contract N. 257219

Satellite data for Earth Observation Optical satellites (e.g. Quickbird) Are affected by cloud coverage Acquire only during day time Because they have a passive sensor on board that needs light to record the image and that cannot see through clouds. MODIS, 16/10/2013 Page 2

Satellite data for Earth Observation Optical satellites (e.g. Quickbird) Can achieve a very high resolution (< 1m) But the higher the resolution, the smaller the coverage VHR1, < 1m resolution VHR2, 1 4 m resolution HR1, 4 10 m resolution Page 3

Satellite data for Earth Observation Optical satellites (e.g. Quickbird) Pass over any AOI once a day at 10:00 ca (local time) Because the second pass is at 22:00 ca (local time), but there is no light Page 4

Satellite data for Earth Observation Radar (SAR) satellites (e.g. COSMO-SkyMed) Are NOT affected by cloud coverage Acquire during day and night time MODIS, 16/10/2013 Because they have an active sensor on board that does not need light to record the image and that can see through clouds with almost any interaction. Radarsat-2, 16/10/2013 Page 5

Satellite data for Earth Observation Radar (SAR) satellites (e.g. COSMO-SkyMed) Can achieve a very high resolution (1m) But the higher the resolution, the smaller the coverage VHR2, 3m resolution HR2, 12m resolution Page 6

Satellite data for Earth Observation Radar (SAR) satellites (e.g. COSMO-SkyMed) Pass over any AOI twice a day at 07:00 ca (local time) Because they can exploit both day and night passes Page 7

Satellite data access - Time All Earth Observation satellite systems have time constraints for both: Acquiring images: OPTICAL Satellites: one pass/day at 10:00 ca local time SAR Satellites: two passes/day at 07:00 and 19:00 ca local time Uplink the acquisition plan to the satellite: OPTICAL Satellites: in general up to 6 hours* prior to pass (best case: 30 mins) SAR Satellites: in general up to 18 hours* prior to pass (best case: 6 hours) *Times expressed are indicative and depend on the satellite mission, the area to be acquired and the time of request submission In case of an activation over EU received at 12:00 on Day-0 : First available OPTICAL pass: 10:00 ca Day-1 First available SAR pass: 07:00 ca Day-1 (best case), 19:00 ca Day- 1 (normal case) Page 8

Access to Satellite data Actors GIO EMS RUSH Service Provider: Receives the SRF from DG ECHO/ERCC, refines AOIs together with AU and submit a generic Satellite data request (SPERF) to ESA (e.g. SAR VHR2 New Acquisition) ESA GEST: Receives the SPERF, contacts the relevant Satellite data commercial providers (GCMEs) and orders the most relevant satellite data within the requested category (e.g. Radarsat-2) Satellite Data Providers (e.g. MDA): Receive the tasking request from ESA and are responsible for the whole satellite data operations (planning, collection, production, delivery) Page 9

Access to Satellite data Workflow DAY 1 30th May 12:30 UTC SRF from AU 15:00 UTC GIO triggering (SRF) AOI negotiation 14:00 UTC SPERF to ESA 19:00 UTC SRT from ESA WV-2 images New 30/05/2013 AOI01 & AOI02 REJECTED by GSP Pleiades images New 31/05/2013 10:04 UTC AOI01 Delivered 18:00 UTC --> DELINEATION MAP AOI01 22:00 UTC Page 10

Access to Satellite data Main issues AOI Negotiation: ISSUE: If the received SRF is not well structured (1 OVR + 1 DTL min), Satellite data request to ESA cannot be transmitted and collection opportunies could be missed SOLUTION: SRF transmitted to GIO EMS RUSH service shall contain at least 1 OVR and 1 DTL AOIs at a consistent scale Cancellations from Satellite data providers: ISSUE: In case of techncial issues or conflict with other orders with higher priority, Sat. Providers can cancel tasking orders causing additional 24 hours delay SOLUTION: task multiple satellite missions as back up Delay in Satellite data delivery after collection: ISSUE: In some cases more than 10 hours after collection are wited before satellite image is delivered on FTP SOLUTION: - Slow data transfer rate: ISSUE: In some cases the data download speed is very low, introducing delays of hours before image can be analyzed SOLUTION: Control the download speed capabilities at the two ends Page 11

Satellite Flood Mapping - Principles Flood mapping from satellite imagery (Optical or SAR) is based on the following steps: 1. Extraction of the visible water extent from the post event image 2. Subtraction form the visible water extent of the extent of water bodies in normal conditions 1 2 Page 12

Flood mapping - Comparison Page 13

Flood Mapping Advantages/Limitations Satellite Flood mapping has the following advantages, compared to alternitives like in field or aerieal surveys: 1. Capability to acquire data everywhere in the world, covering a wide area in a very short time frame 2. Capability to acquire data under every weather condition and during night time (only SAR) 3. Capability to monitor the evolution of water retreat during the days/weeks following the event' with daily updates Satellite Flood mapping has the following limitations, compared to alternitives like in field or aerieal surveys: 1. Flood detection capability in urban and vegetated areas (SAR) 1. Due to resolution and active sensor limitations 2. Flood detection capability in forested areas (optical) 1. Due to passive sensor limitations 3. Flood detection capability in case of material presence (e.g. mudflows) Page 14

Limitations of SAR based flood mapping SAR based flood mapping is very effective when the standing water creates a flat surface In urban and forested areas the detection of standing water is disturbed by the presence of object that both prevent sensing (e.g. tree canopy) or alter the results (e.g. double bouncing effect, presence of material objects) Siem Reap, Cambodia Page 15

Thank you! www.e-geos.it Domenico Grandoni GIO EMS RUSH Service Provider Technical Manager +39 06 4079 3089 domenico.grandoni@e-geos.it Page 16